Optical security device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10173453
  • Patent Number
    10,173,453
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 14, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 8, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
An improved form of optical security device for use in the protection of documents and articles of value from counterfeit and to verify authenticity is provided. The inventive device, which is made up of an optionally embedded array of icon focusing elements, at least one grayscale in-plane image, and a plurality of coextensive control patterns of icons contained on or within the in-plane image, each control pattern being mapped to areas of the grayscale in-plane image having a range of grayscale levels, provides enhanced design capability, improved visual impact, and greater resistance to manufacturing variations.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to an improved form of optical security device for use in the protection of documents and articles of value from counterfeit and to verify authenticity. More specifically, this invention relates to an optical security device that provides enhanced design capability, improved visual impact, and greater resistance to manufacturing variations.


BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Micro-optic film materials projecting synthetic images generally comprise: an arrangement of micro-sized image icons; an arrangement of focusing elements (e.g., microlenses, microreflectors); and optionally, a light-transmitting polymeric substrate. The image icon and focusing element arrangements are configured such that when the arrangement of image icons is viewed using the arrangement of focusing elements, one or more synthetic images are projected. These projected images may show a number of different optical effects.


Such film materials may be used as security devices for authentication of banknotes, secure documents and products. For banknotes and secure documents, these materials are typically used in the form of a strip, patch, or thread and can be either partially or completely embedded within the banknote or document, or applied to a surface thereof. For passports or other identification (ID) documents, these materials could be used as a full laminate or inlayed in a surface thereof. For product packaging, these materials are typically used in the form of a label, seal, or tape and are applied to a surface thereof.


One example of a micro-optic security device is known from U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175, which reveals a micro-optic system that embodies (a) an in-plane image having a boundary and an image area within the boundary that is carried on and visually lies in the plane of a substrate, (b) a control pattern of icons contained within the boundary of the in-plane image, and (c) an array of icon focusing elements. The icon focusing element array is positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of the control pattern of icons, the synthetically magnified image providing a limited field of view for viewing the in-plane image operating to modulate the appearance of the in-plane image. In other words, the appearance of the in-plane image visually appears and disappears, or turns on and off, depending upon the viewing angle of the system.


Several drawbacks in this micro-optic system become evident when used in a sealed lens format (i.e., a system utilizing an embedded lens array). First, when the synthetic image is in its “off” state a slight ghost image of the synthetic image may remain visible because of light scattered through or around the focusing optics. These ghost images are especially pronounced in the sealed lens format. Second, the sealed lens format has a relatively high f-number, typically around 2. As will be readily appreciated by one skilled in the field of micro-optics, a higher f-number leads to more rapid movement of synthetic images, but also increases blurriness and the system's sensitivity to manufacturing variations. These drawbacks effectively render this system unsuitable for use in a sealed lens format.


The present invention addresses these drawbacks by providing an optical security device, which comprises:


an optionally embedded array of icon focusing elements;


at least one grayscale in-plane image that visually lies substantially in a plane of a substrate on which the in-plane image is carried; and


a plurality of coextensive (intermingled) control patterns of icons contained on or within the at least one in-plane image forming an icon layer, each control pattern being mapped to areas of the in-plane image having a range of grayscale levels, wherein placement of the control patterns of icons within the in-plane image is determined using one or more control pattern probability distributions associated with each grayscale level within all or part of the in-plane image,


wherein the array of icon focusing elements is positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of at least a portion of the icons in each coextensive control pattern of icons, the at least one synthetically magnified image (which intersects with the at least one in-plane image) having one or more dynamic effects, wherein the one or more dynamic effects of the at least one synthetically magnified image are controlled and choreographed by the control patterns of icons.


As the optical security device is tilted the synthetically magnified images demonstrate dynamic optical effects in the form of, for example, dynamic bands of rolling color running through the in-plane image, growing concentric circles, rotating highlights, strobe-like effects, pulsing text, pulsing images, rolling parallel or non-parallel lines, rolling lines that move in opposite directions but at the same rate, rolling lines that move in opposition directions but at different or spatially varying rates, bars of color that spin around a central point like a fan, bars of color that radiate inward or outward from a fixed profile, embossed surfaces, engraved surfaces, as well as animation types of effects such as animated figures, moving text, moving symbols, animated abstract designs that are mathematical or organic in nature, etc. Dynamic optical effects also include those optical effects described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al., all of which, as noted above, are fully incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.


In an exemplary embodiment, one or more layers of metallization cover an outer surface of the icon layer.


By way of the inventive optical security device, the synthetically magnified image(s) of the in-plane image(s) is always ‘on’. In one exemplary embodiment, as the device is tilted synthetically magnified images in the form of bands of color sweep over the surface of the in-plane image, revealing tremendous detail (i.e., improved visual impact). The bands of color are ‘choreographed’ using the multiple control patterns of icons. The ‘ghost image’, which is troublesome for the micro-optic system of U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175, helps the optical effects of the present invention to be more convincing by providing a silhouette of the in-plane image at every tilt angle that can always be seen. Also, because the image never turns ‘off’, and is visually defined by the choreographed optical effects (e.g., bands of rolling color), the in-plane image may be made much larger thereby providing enhanced design capability. In addition, the inventive device is less sensitive to manufacturing variations. While any such manufacturing variation may serve to change the angle and shape of the synthetic images, the relative choreography will remain the same, and thus the effect will not be disturbed to the same extent as the prior art system.


The present invention also provides a method for making the optical security device described above, the method comprising:

    • (a) providing at least one grayscale in-plane image that visually lies substantially in a plane of a substrate on which the in-plane image is carried;
    • (b) providing a plurality of coextensive (intermingled) control patterns of icons contained on or within the at least one in-plane image forming an icon layer, each control pattern being mapped to areas of the in-plane image having a range of grayscale levels, wherein placement of the control patterns of icons within the in-plane image is determined using one or more control pattern probability distributions associated with each grayscale level within all or part of the in-plane image;
    • (c) providing an optionally embedded array of icon focusing elements; and
    • (d) positioning the optionally embedded array of icon focusing elements relative to the icon layer so as to form at least one synthetically magnified image of at least a portion of the icons in each coextensive control pattern of icons, the at least one synthetically magnified image (which intersects with the at least one in-plane image) having one or more dynamic effects, wherein the one or more dynamic effects of the at least one synthetically magnified image are controlled and choreographed by the control patterns of icons.


In an exemplary embodiment of the inventive optical security device, the device includes a grayscale in-plane image, a plurality of control patterns of icons contained within the in-plane image thereby forming an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of the control patterns of icons. The method for forming the icon layer in this exemplary embodiment comprises: selecting a grayscale in-plane image; and using the grayscale in-plane image to drive placement of the control patterns of icons within the in-plane image to form the icon layer.


In an exemplary embodiment, the inventive method comprises:

    • (a) selecting a grayscale in-plane image and scaling the grayscale image to a size suitable for use in the icon layer (e.g., several square millimeters to several square centimeters);
    • (b) superimposing a tiling onto the scaled grayscale in-plane image, the tiling comprising cells that will contain the control patterns of icons, wherein each cell has a preferred size similar to one or several focusing elements (e.g., several microns to tens of microns);
    • (c) selecting a numerical range to represent the colors black and white and the various levels of gray in between black and white (e.g., 0 for black, 1 for white, and the continuum of real numbers in between as representing the various levels of gray);
    • (d) determining the level of grayscale of the scaled grayscale in-plane image in each cell of the superimposed tiling;
    • (e) assigning to each cell a number which represents the determined level of grayscale and which falls within the selected numerical range (e.g., 0-1), wherein the assigned number is the cell's grayscale value;
    • (f) selecting a number of control patterns of icons for use in a control pattern palette, and for each control pattern of icons, assigning a range of grayscale levels which fall within the selected numerical range;
    • (g) specifying a control pattern probability distribution within the in-plane image and for each possible grayscale value, using the control pattern probability distribution to assign a range of random numbers to each control pattern;
    • (h) providing each cell in the tiling with a random number that falls with the selected numerical range (e.g., 0-1) using a Random Number Generator (RNG);
    • (i) determining which control pattern will be used to fill each cell using the cell's grayscale value and the cell's random number in conjunction with a mathematical construct which corresponds to the control pattern probability distribution; and
    • (j) filling each cell with its determined control pattern of icons.


In another exemplary embodiment of the inventive optical security device, the device includes a sequence of grayscale in-plane images, a set of control patterns of icons for each in-plane image, wherein each set of control patterns of icons is contained within its respective in-plane image, which together form an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form an animation of the synthetically magnified images of the control patterns of icons. The method for forming the icon layer in this exemplary embodiment comprises: selecting a sequence of grayscale in-plane images, selecting a set of control patterns of icons for each grayscale in-plane image; and using the grayscale in-plane images to drive placement of its respective control patterns of icons within the in-plane image to together form the icon layer.


In an exemplary embodiment, the inventive method comprises:

    • (a) selecting a sequence of grayscale in-plane images that form an animation and scaling the grayscale images to a size suitable for use in the icon layer (e.g., several square millimeters to several square centimeters);
    • (b) superimposing a tiling onto each scaled grayscale in-plane image, the tiling comprising cells that will contain the control patterns of icons, wherein each cell has a preferred size similar to one or several focusing elements (e.g., several microns to tens of microns);
    • (c) selecting a numerical range to represent the colors black and white and the various levels of gray in between black and white (e.g., 0 for black, 1 for white, and the continuum of real numbers in between as representing the various levels of gray);
    • (d) determining the level of grayscale of the scaled grayscale in-plane image in each cell of the superimposed tiling;
    • (e) assigning to each cell a number which represents the determined level of grayscale and which falls within the selected numerical range (e.g., 0-1), wherein the assigned number is the cell's grayscale value;
    • (f) for each grayscale in-plane image that forms the animation, selecting a number of control patterns of icons for use in a control pattern palette, and for each control pattern of icons, assigning a range of grayscale levels which fall within the selected numerical range, wherein the selected number of control patterns of icons constitutes a set of control patterns for the grayscale in-plane image, with each grayscale in-plane image having one set of control patterns of icons;
    • (g) specifying, for each set of control patterns of icons, a control pattern probability distribution within the respective in-plane image and for each possible grayscale value, using the control pattern probability distribution to assign a range of random numbers to each control pattern;
    • (h) providing each cell in the tiling with a random number that falls with the selected numerical range (e.g., 0-1) using an RNG;
    • (i) determining, for each set of control patterns, each set being assigned to a specific and different grayscale image, which control pattern will be used to fill each cell using the cell's grayscale value and the cell's random number in conjunction with a mathematical construct which corresponds to the control pattern probability distribution; and
    • (j) filling each cell with its determined control pattern of icons, each cell receiving a determined control pattern from each set of control patterns of icons.


The present invention further provides a method for increasing design space, reducing sensitivity to manufacturing variations, and reducing blurriness of images formed by an optical security device, the optical security device including at least one in-plane image, a plurality of control patterns of icons contained within the in-plane image forming an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of the control patterns of icons, the method comprising: using at least one grayscale in-plane image; and using coordinated control patterns of icons on or within the in-plane image to control and choreograph one or more dynamic effects of the synthetically magnified images.


The present invention further provides sheet materials and base platforms that are made from or employ the inventive optical security device, as well as documents made from these materials.


In an exemplary embodiment, the inventive optical security device is a micro-optic film material such as an ultra-thin (e.g., a thickness ranging from about 1 to about 10 microns), sealed lens structure for use in banknotes.


In another exemplary embodiment, the inventive optical security device is a sealed lens polycarbonate inlay for base platforms used in the manufacture of plastic passports.


Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods/processes, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following drawings. Components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. While exemplary embodiments are disclosed in connection with the drawings, there is no intent to limit the present disclosure to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed herein. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents.


Particular features of the disclosed invention are illustrated by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a grayscale in-plane image used in the practice of the present invention, while FIG. 1B illustrates a tiling superimposed onto the grayscale in-plane image of FIG. 1A;



FIG. 2 illustrates an enlarged portion of the tiled grayscale in-plane image of FIG. 1A, showing grayscale levels of the in-plane image measured at the lower-left corner of four rectangular tiles or cells;



FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a control pattern probability distribution with vertical overlap between the control patterns in the distribution in which the random numbers are chosen between 0 and 1 and the grayscale values range from 0.0 to 1.0;



FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a control pattern probability distribution with no vertical overlap between the control patterns in the distribution in which the random numbers are again chosen between 0 and 1 and the grayscale values again range from 0.0 to 1.0;



FIG. 5 illustrates a collection of six control patterns of grayscale icons that are each contained in separate contiguous rectangular tiles, while in FIG. 7, these six control patterns are shown overlaid onto the same tile;



FIG. 6 illustrates a tessellated collection of six coextensive (intermingled) control patterns of icons;



FIGS. 8 and 9 both illustrate the intersection of a grayscale in-plane image with synthetically magnified images generated by the control patterns of icons;



FIGS. 10 and 11 illustrate different control pattern distributions (FIGS. 10A and 11A), and the resulting images that a viewer would see (FIGS. 10B and 11B);



FIG. 12 illustrates the grayscale in-plane image shown in FIG. 1A ‘filled’ with the control patterns of icons shown in FIG. 6;



FIG. 13 illustrates one of the images (without dynamic optical effects) viewable from a surface of an exemplary embodiment of the inventive optical security device that employs the ‘filled’ in-plane image shown in FIG. 12;



FIG. 14 illustrates a collection of six grayscale images that form an animation; and



FIG. 15 illustrates a stage in the formation of an icon layer used to produce the animation shown in FIG. 14, which has six sets of control patterns of icons (as columns), each containing six control patterns of icons (as rows).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

By way of the optical security device of the present invention, a new platform for giving very detailed images is provided. As mentioned above, the inventive device provides enhanced design capability, improved visual impact, and greater resistance to manufacturing variations.


The two exemplary embodiments of the inventive optical security device described above will now be depicted in more detail below in conjunction with the drawings.


In-Plane Image


The in-plane image of the inventive optical security device is an image that has some visual boundary, pattern, or structure that visually lies substantially in the plane of the substrate on which or in which the in-plane image is carried.


In FIG. 1A, an exemplary embodiment of a grayscale in-plane image in the form of a monkey's face is marked with reference numeral 10. Grayscale in-plane image 10, which is simply an image in which the only colors are shades of gray (i.e., shades from black to white), has a boundary 12 and an image area 14 within the boundary that, as noted above, visually lies substantially in a plane of a substrate on which the in-plane image 10 is carried. In this exemplary embodiment, the grayscale image was made so that the parts that seem ‘closest’ to the viewer (the eyes and nose) are whitest, while the parts that seem ‘farthest away’ from the viewer are darkest.


When forming the icon layer of the inventive optical security device, a single grayscale image (such as that shown in FIG. 1A) is chosen and scaled to the ‘actual size’ that it should be in physical form. In one exemplary embodiment, the image is scaled to a size ranging from about several square millimeters to about several square centimeters. This is typically much larger than the focusing elements, which in terms of microlenses typically having a size on the order of microns or tens of microns.


Next, as best shown in FIG. 1B, a tiling 16 is superimposed onto the grayscale image 10. This tiling 16 represents cells that will contain the control patterns of icons. The size of each cell is not limited, but in an exemplary embodiment, is on the order of the size of one or several focusing elements (e.g., from several microns to tens of microns). While rectangular-shaped cells are shown in FIG. 1B, any variety of shapes that form a tessellation can be used (e.g., parallelograms, triangles, regular or non-regular hexagons, or squares).


A numerical range is then selected to represent the colors black and white and the various levels of gray in between black and white. Some methods map black to 0 and white to 255, and the levels of gray to the integers in between (e.g., in 8-bit grayscale images), while some methods use larger ranges of numbers (e.g., in 16 or 32 bit grayscale images). In the present exemplary embodiment, however, for simplicity, 0 is used for black and 1 is used for white and the continuum of real numbers in between 0 and 1 is used to represent the various levels of gray.


The level of grayscale at the location of each cell in the grayscale image 10 is then determined. For example, and as best shown in FIG. 2, for each cell, a common point is chosen (e.g., the lower-left corner of each rectangular tile or cell) and the level of grayscale of the in-plane image 10 corresponding to that point is measured at the common point and assigned to the cell. This can be achieved through direct measurement of the grayscale image at that point (as illustrated in FIG. 2), or the value can be interpolated from the pixels of the grayscale image using various image sampling techniques.


In FIG. 2, the pixels of the grayscale in-plane image 10 are smaller than the cells of the tiling 16. The pixels of the grayscale in-plane image, however, can be larger than the cells. As will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, in the latter case, it may be advantageous to use an interpolation method or technique for sub-sampling the pixels.


Each cell is then assigned a number which represents the determined level of grayscale and which falls within the selected numerical range (e.g., 0-1). This assigned number is referred to as the cell's grayscale value.


Control Patterns of Icons


As previously noted, the coextensive control patterns of icons are contained on or within the in-plane image(s) forming an icon layer, with each control pattern containing icons mapped to areas of the in-plane image that fall within a range of grayscale levels (e.g., a grayscale level between 0 (black) and 0.1667).


Once each cell in the tiling 16 has been assigned a grayscale value (and accordingly each possible grayscale value has been determined), a control pattern probability distribution is specified, which serves to assign a range of random numbers to each control pattern. Each cell is then provided with a random number that falls with the selected numerical range (e.g., 0-1) using a RNG.


Once a cell's random number is selected and the grayscale value of that cell is known, a particular control pattern for that particular cell can be assigned. The control pattern probability distribution effectively sets the probability that a particular control pattern in the control pattern palette will be used to fill a particular cell.


An example of a control pattern distribution is shown in FIG. 3. In this example, three different control patterns are in the control pattern palette (Control Pattern A (CP A), Control Pattern B (CP B), Control Pattern C (CP C)), with each control pattern occupying its own triangular region in the control pattern distribution. Each possible grayscale value is mapped to a vertical cross section of this distribution. The vertical cross section showing which random numbers correspond to which control pattern.


By way of example, for a cell whose grayscale value is 1.0, this would correspond to a point along the distribution where the probability that Control Pattern A should be chosen is 100%, the probability that Control Pattern B should be chosen is 0%, and the probability that Control Pattern C should be chosen is 0%. This is because all of the random numbers between 0 and 1 will correspond to control pattern A.


By way of further example, for a cell whose grayscale value is 0.7, a random number chosen between 0 and 0.4 will correspond to that particular cell being filled with Control Pattern A, while a random number chosen between 0.4 and 1.0 will correspond to that particular cell being filled with Control Pattern B. There is no possibility for this cell to be filled with Control Pattern C.


By way of yet a further example, for a cell whose grayscale value is 0.25, a random number between 0 and 0.5 will correspond to that particular cell being filled with Control Pattern C, while a random number chosen between 0.5 and 1.0 will correspond to that particular cell being filled with Control Pattern B. In other words, there is a 50% probability that the cell will be filled with Control Pattern C and a 50% probability that the cell will be filled with Control Pattern B.


There is no practical limit on the definition of the control pattern probability distribution, which is simply a mathematical construct that connects a random number to the choice of control pattern. The control pattern distribution can adjust many different aspects of the dynamic optical effects of the subject invention, such as, for example, more rapid or slower transition between control patterns, and multiple control patterns visible simultaneously. In addition, and as alluded to above, different portions of the in-plane image may have different control pattern distributions and different collections or palettes of control patterns. This would allow some portions of the in-plane image to be activated with left-right tilting, while other portions are activated with towards-away tilting, and yet other portions to be activated regardless of the direction of tilt. In the present exemplary embodiment, the primary purpose of the control pattern distribution is to automatically ‘dither’ or smooth the boundaries between the parts of the grayscale image that would be filled with different control patterns of icons. Because the control pattern distribution provides a probabilistic means by which the control patterns of icons are chosen, the areas of the in-plane image that are assigned to a given control pattern need not be sharply defined. Instead, there can be smooth transition from one control pattern's area to the next.


Sharp boundaries can, however, be made to exist through proper definition of the control pattern probability distribution. A control pattern distribution that would provide sharp transition from one control pattern to the next is shown in FIG. 4. Because there is no vertical overlap between the Control Pattern regions in this distribution, the random numbers essentially play no role in the selection of the control patterns. That being said, any grayscale value from 0.0 to 0.25 would result in that cell being filled with Control Pattern C, any grayscale value from 0.25 to 0.7 would result in that cell being filled with Control Pattern B, and any grayscale value from 0.7 to 1.0 would result in that cell being filled with Control Pattern A.


The next step in the inventive method for forming an icon layer of an optical security device is filling each cell with its determined control pattern of icons.


As previously indicated, the dynamic effects of the synthetically magnified images generated by the inventive optical security device are controlled and choreographed by the control patterns of icons. More specifically, the choreography of these images is prescribed by the relative phasing of the control patterns and by the control pattern distribution, in addition to the nature of the grayscale in-plane image.


Referring now to FIG. 5, a collection of six (6) control patterns, each made up of different gray-toned icons in the form of horizontal lines 18, is shown for illustrative purposes. The bold black outlines 20 represent the tile which would be used to repeat (tessellate) the control patterns of icons on a plane. The tiles for these six control patterns, which define the manner in which the control patterns are tessellated onto a plane, happen to be the same rectangular shape. The tiles, however, as noted above, can adopt any shape that forms a tessellation. The tiles shown in FIG. 5 also have the same dimensions. The tiles are ‘in phase’ in the sense that they meet up along the same grid. This ensures that, when the control patterns are distributed on or within the in-plane image, the relative timing of when the control patterns are ‘activated’ remains constant.


As shown in FIG. 5 and also in FIG. 6 (where six control patterns 22a-f are shown tessellated onto a plane), the icons in each control pattern are shifted relative to the icons in other control patterns. The icons may be very slightly shifted up by a few hundred nanometers or slightly more dramatically shifted by a few microns. For control patterns of icons in the form of vertical lines, the icons in each control pattern could be shifted left-right or right-left, while for control patterns of icons in the form of diagonal lines, the icons in each control pattern could be shifted along the diagonal.


It is noted here that there are numerous other ways of coordinating the control patterns to each other. For example, the control patterns could have an intentionally coordinated ‘starting point’ and fall along different grids.


While six (6) control patterns are shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the number of control patterns used in the present invention is not so limited. In fact, the number of control patterns of icons could be of infinite number and variety if they are generated mathematically.


Referring now to FIG. 7, the six control patterns in FIG. 5 are shown overlaid onto the same tile 24. Here, the control patterns A-F are shown ‘doubled’ in the rectangular tile 24 because this tile is sized to several focusing elements. In one contemplated embodiment, each tile is sized to two focusing elements with hexagonal base diameters. In other words, each tile is in the shape of a rectangular box that represents two hexagons. There is no loss of generality to consider a tile to be a group of control patterns of icons, and the use of rectangular tilings as opposed to hexagonal tilings may make tessellation and algorithms easier to work with.


The collective group of all of the control patterns shown in FIG. 7 completely and evenly covers the tile 24. The idea that the control patterns ‘completely and evenly’ cover the tile, however, is not meant to be limiting. For example, depending on the desired effect, the collective group of all of the control patterns may only partially cover the tile, or may cover the tile multiple times (i.e., several control patterns occupy the same space on the tile).


In FIGS. 8 and 9, the intersection of the grayscale in-plane image 10 with a synthetically magnified image generated by a control pattern of icons is shown. In the illustrations shown in these figures, the synthetic images are depicted as small rectangles floating above the surface of this exemplary embodiment of the inventive optical security device. The surface of the inventive device carries the grayscale in-plane image 10. Where the synthetic images generated by the control patterns of icons can be thought of as being projected onto the surface of the inventive device, they are also shown in these figures as lying on the surface of the device. The intersection of the in-plane image 10 and the synthetic image, along with the control pattern distribution, determines what a viewer 26 will actually see. In both of these exemplary embodiments, as the inventive optical security device is tilted towards-away from the viewer, the collective focal points of the focusing elements will effectively shift upward and downward. This means that the intersection of a synthetic image with the in-plane image 10 will shift accordingly so that the synthetic image from a new contributing control pattern will highlight the in-plane image. For example, in FIG. 8, the viewer 26 sees the intersection of the synthetic image 28 formed by Control Pattern F with the middle of the in-plane image 10, while in FIG. 9, the viewer 26, now looking from a different angle, sees the intersection of the synthetic image 30 formed by control pattern D with the middle of the in-plane image 10.


Because the synthetic images shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, completely cover the in-plane image 10, there will always be portions of the in-plane image 10 that are visible or ‘turned on’, no matter what viewing angle. Additionally, the slight ghost images of the synthetic images that remain visible because of light scattered through or around the focusing optics (as mentioned above) will help outline the in-plane image as a whole so that the coherent in-plane image is always visible.


In FIGS. 10 and 11, examples of control pattern distributions, and the resulting images that a viewer would see, are shown.


The control pattern distribution 32 shown in FIG. 10A is a “hard transition” control pattern distribution, which as alluded to above, results in sharp transitions between the synthetic images generated by the control patterns of icons. In FIG. 10B, the grayscale image 10 is shown for reference purposes along with a collection of views 34 of the intersection between the control patterns' synthetic images and the in-plane image.


The control pattern distribution 36 shown in FIG. 11A is a “soft transition” control pattern distribution, which as also alluded to above, results in smooth transitions between the synthetic images generated by the control patterns of icons. In FIG. 11B, the grayscale in-plane image 10 is shown for reference purposes along with a collection of views 38 of the intersection between the control patterns' synthetic images and the in-plane image.


In FIGS. 10 and 11, the synthetic images formed by Control Pattern F, when intersected with the grayscale in-plane image 10, will yield a version of the monkey face with highlighted ears. This is because the ears represent the darkest parts of this grayscale in-plane image and the control pattern distribution has its darkest grayscale values associated with Control Pattern F.


Referring to the ‘frames’ of the animation offered by these exemplary embodiments of the inventive optical security device, which are shown in FIGS. 10B and 11B, it will be seen that the use of a ‘hard transition’ control pattern distribution results in a ‘hard boundary’ between the different control pattern contributions to the in-plane image as a whole, while the use of a ‘soft transition’ control pattern distribution results in ‘soft boundary’ contributions to the in-plane image as a whole. In both embodiments, the viewer will see sweeping elevations rolling over a surface shaped like the in-plane image (i.e., a monkey's face).


As is evident from the above discussion, the dynamic optical effects demonstrated by the present invention are determined by the relative phasing of the control patterns and by the control pattern distribution, in addition to the nature of the grayscale in-plane image.


In FIG. 12, the in-plane image 10 is shown ‘filled’ with the six (6) control patterns of icons shown in FIG. 6. In FIG. 13, one of the images (without dynamic optical effects) 40 viewable from a surface of the inventive optical security device employing the ‘filled’ in-plane image shown in FIG. 12, is illustrated.


In another exemplary embodiment of the inventive optical security device, more than one grayscale image is used, which allows for the animation of the synthetically magnified images. In this embodiment, each grayscale image is assigned a column, or “set” of control patterns of icons. The method for forming the icon layer in this exemplary embodiment is described above, with the selection of control patterns of icons being carried out for each grayscale image simultaneously, forming an overlay of the results of a plurality of grayscale images.


In the example shown in FIGS. 14 and 15, a collection of six grayscale images form an animation. As best shown in FIG. 15, the control patterns within the same “set” have variation in the vertical direction. That means that, for a given set (or, similarly, for a given grayscale image), tilting in the vertical direction will have the effect of rolling the color through the image in a choreography described by that set's control pattern probability distribution. Corresponding control patterns in adjacent sets have variation in the horizontal direction. That means that tilting in the horizontal direction will have the effect of changing the grayscale image and can produce the effect of an animation.


In this example, the sets of control patterns of icons can be coordinated such that there is one effect when the device is tilted towards-away (due to the variation within a set of control patterns of icons) and a different effect when the device is tilted right-left or left-right (due to the variation among the sets of control patterns of icons).


Generally speaking, there is no limit to the number of sets of control patterns of icons (equivalently the number grayscale in-plane images), or the number of control patterns within the set. This is due to the fact that the variation within either the horizontal or vertical direction can be continuous and can be based off of the continuum of time (for “frames” of animation), or the continuum of grayscale (equivalently, the real numbers on a range (e.g., [0,1])).


Although not a required feature, the icons shown and described herein are rather simple in design, adopting the shape of simple geometric shapes (e.g., circles, dots, squares, rectangles, stripes, bars, etc.) and lines (e.g., horizontal, vertical, or diagonal lines).


The icons may adopt any physical form and in one exemplary embodiment are microstructured icons (i.e., icons having a physical relief). In a preferred embodiment the microstructured icons are in the form of:

    • (a) optionally coated and/or filled voids or recesses formed on or within a substrate. The voids or recesses each measure from about 0.01 to about 50 microns in total depth; and/or
    • (b) shaped posts formed on a surface of a substrate, each measuring from about 0.01 to about 50 microns in total height.


In one such embodiment, the microstructured icons are in the form of voids or recesses in a polymeric substrate, or their inverse shaped posts, with the voids (or recesses) or regions surrounding the shaped posts optionally filled with a contrasting substance such as dyes, coloring agents, pigments, powdered materials, inks, powdered minerals, metal materials and particles, magnetic materials and particles, magnetized materials and particles, magnetically reactive materials and particles, phosphors, liquid crystals, liquid crystal polymers, carbon black or other light absorbing materials, titanium dioxide or other light scattering materials, photonic crystals, non-linear crystals, nanoparticles, nanotubes, buckeyballs, buckeytubes, organic materials, pearlescent materials, powdered pearls, multilayer interference materials, opalescent materials, iridescent materials, low refractive index materials or powders, high refractive index materials or powders, diamond powder, structural color materials, polarizing materials, polarization rotating materials, fluorescent materials, phosphorescent materials, thermochromic materials, piezochromic materials, photochromic materials, tribolumenscent materials, electroluminescent materials, electrochromic materials, magnetochromic materials and particles, radioactive materials, radioactivatable materials, electret charge separation materials, and combinations thereof. Examples of suitable icons are also disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al., all of which, as noted above, are fully incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.


The icon layer of the inventive optical security device may have one or more layers of metallization applied to an outer surface thereof. The resulting effect is like an anisotropic lighting effect on metal, which may be useful for select applications.


Icon Focusing Elements


The optionally embedded array of icon focusing elements is positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of at least a portion of the icons in each coextensive control pattern of icons. As the optical security device is tilted the synthetically magnified image of the in-plane image appears to have one or more dynamic optical effects (e.g., dynamic bands of rolling color running through it, growing concentric circles, rotating highlights, strobe-like effects). Upon proper placement of an icon focusing element array over the ‘filled’ in-plane image, one or more synthetically magnified images are projected, the dynamic optical effects of which are controlled and choreographed by the control patterns of icons.


The icon focusing elements used in the practice of the present invention are not limited and include, but are not limited to, cylindrical and non-cylindrical refractive, reflective, and hybrid refractive/reflective focusing elements.


In an exemplary embodiment, the focusing elements are non-cylindrical convex or concave refractive microlenses having a spheric or aspheric surface. Aspheric surfaces include conical, elliptical, parabolic, and other profiles. These lenses may have circular, oval, or polygonal (e.g., hexagonal, substantially hexagonal, square, substantially square) base geometries, and may be arranged in regular, irregular, or random, one- or two-dimensional arrays. In a preferred embodiment, the microlenses are aspheric concave or convex lenses having polygonal (e.g., hexagonal) base geometries that are arranged in a regular, two-dimensional array on a substrate or light-transmitting polymer film.


The focusing elements, in one such exemplary embodiment, have preferred widths (in the case of cylindrical lenses) and base diameters (in the case of non-cylindrical lenses) of less than or equal to 1 millimeter including (but not limited to) widths/base diameters: ranging from about 200 to about 500 microns; and ranging from about 50 to about 199 microns, preferred focal lengths of less than or equal to 1 millimeter including (but not limited to) the sub-ranges noted above, and preferred f-numbers of less than or equal to 10 (more preferably, less than or equal to 6. In another contemplated embodiment, the focusing elements have preferred widths/base diameters of less than about 50 microns (more preferably, less than about 45 microns, and most preferably, from about 10 to about 40 microns), preferred focal lengths of less than about 50 microns (more preferably, less than about 45 microns, and most preferably, from about 10 to about 30 microns), and preferred f-numbers of less than or equal to 10 (more preferably, less than or equal to 6). In yet another contemplated embodiment, the focusing elements are cylindrical or lenticular lenses that are much larger than the lenses described above with no upper limit on lens width.


As alluded to above, the array of icon focusing elements used in the inventive optical security device may constitute an array of exposed icon focusing elements (e.g., exposed refractive microlenses), or may constitute an array of embedded icon focusing elements (e.g., embedded microlenses), the embedding layer constituting an outermost layer of the optical security device.


Optical Separation


Although not required by the present invention, optical separation between the array of focusing elements and the control patterns of icons may be achieved using one or more optical spacers. In one such embodiment, an optical spacer is bonded to the focusing element layer. In another embodiment, an optical spacer may be formed as a part of the focusing element layer, an optical spacer may be formed during manufacture independently from the other layers, or the thickness of the focusing element layer increased to allow the layer to be free standing. In yet another embodiment, the optical spacer is bonded to another optical spacer.


The optical spacer may be formed using one or more essentially colorless materials including, but not limited to, polymers such as polycarbonate, polyester, polyethylene, polyethylene napthalate, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polyvinylidene chloride, and the like.


In other contemplated embodiments of the present invention, the optical security device does not employ an optical spacer. In one such embodiment, the optical security device is an optionally transferable security device with a reduced thickness (“thin construction”), which basically comprises an icon layer substantially in contact with an array of optionally embedded icon focusing elements.


Method of Manufacture


The inventive optical security device may be prepared (to the extent not inconsistent with the teachings of the present invention) in accordance with the materials, methods and techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0308571 A1 to Steenblik et al., all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. As described in these references, arrays of focusing elements and image icons can be formed from a variety of materials such as substantially transparent or clear, colored or colorless polymers such as acrylics, acrylated polyesters, acrylated urethanes, epoxies, polycarbonates, polypropylenes, polyesters, urethanes, and the like, using a multiplicity of methods that are known in the art of micro-optic and microstructure replication, including extrusion (e.g., extrusion embossing, soft embossing), radiation cured casting, and injection molding, reaction injection molding, and reaction casting. High refractive index, colored or colorless materials having refractive indices (at 589 nm, 20° C.) of more than 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, or higher, such as those described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2010/0109317 A1 to Hoffmuller et al., may also be used. As also described, embedding layers can be prepared using adhesives, gels, glues, lacquers, liquids, molded or coated polymers, polymers or other materials containing organic or metallic dispersions, etc.


As noted above, the optical security device of the present invention may be used in the form of sheet materials and base platforms that are made from or employ the inventive optical security device, as well as documents made from these materials. For example, the inventive device may take the form of a security strip, thread, patch, overlay, or inlay that is mounted to a surface of, or at least partially embedded within a fibrous or non-fibrous sheet material (e.g., banknote, passport, ID card, credit card, label), or commercial product (e.g., optical disks, CDs, DVDs, packages of medical drugs). The inventive device may also be used in the form of a standalone product, or in the form of a non-fibrous sheet material for use in making, for example, banknotes, passports, and the like, or it may adopt a thicker, more robust form for use as, for example, a base platform for an ID card, high value or other security document.


In one such exemplary embodiment, the inventive device is a micro-optic film material such as an ultra-thin, sealed lens structure for use in banknotes, while in another such exemplary embodiment; the inventive device is a sealed lens polycarbonate inlay for base platforms used in the manufacture of plastic passports.


While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the exemplary embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. An optical security device, which comprises: an array of icon focusing elements, wherein the focusing elements are non-cylindrical refractive, reflective, or hybrid refractive/reflective focusing elements;at least one grayscale in-plane image that has a boundary and an image area within the boundary that visually lies substantially in a plane of a substrate on which the in-plane image is carried; anda plurality of coextensive control patterns of icons contained on or within the at least one in-plane image forming an icon layer, each control pattern being mapped to areas of the in-plane image having a range of grayscale levels, wherein placement of the control patterns of icons within the in-plane image is determined using one or more control pattern probability distributions associated with each grayscale level within all or part of the in-plane image,wherein the array of icon focusing elements is positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of at least a portion of the icons in each coextensive control pattern of icons, the at least one synthetically magnified image, which intersects with the at least one grayscale in-plane image, having one or more dynamic effects, wherein the one or more dynamic effects of the at least one synthetically magnified image are controlled and choreographed by the control patterns of icons, wherein the choreography of the images is prescribed by the relative phasing of the control patterns and by the control pattern distribution, in addition to the nature of the grayscale in-plane image.
  • 2. The optical security device of claim 1, wherein the array of icon focusing elements is an embedded array of icon focusing elements.
  • 3. The optical security device of claim 1 or 2, wherein the at least one synthetically magnified image is viewable over a range of viewing angles, and wherein a silhouette of the in-plane image is also viewable over this range of viewing angles.
  • 4. The optical security device of claim 1, wherein one or more layers of metallization cover an outer surface of the icon layer.
  • 5. The optical security device of claim 1, which comprises a grayscale in-plane image, a plurality of control patterns of icons contained within the in-plane image thereby forming an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of the control patterns of icons.
  • 6. The optical security device of claim 1, which comprises a sequence of grayscale in-plane images, a set of control patterns of icons for each in-plane image, wherein each set of control patterns of icons is contained within its respective in-plane image, which together form an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form an animation of the synthetically magnified images of the control patterns of icons.
  • 7. A method for making the optical security device of claim 1, the method comprising: (a) providing at least one grayscale in-plane image that has a boundary and an image area within the boundary that visually lies substantially in a plane of a substrate on which the in-plane image is carried;(b) providing a plurality of coextensive control patterns of icons contained on or within the at least one in-plane image forming an icon layer, each control pattern being mapped to areas of the in-plane image having a range of grayscale levels, wherein placement of the control patterns of icons within the in-plane image is determined using one or more control pattern probability distributions associated with each grayscale level within all or part of the in-plane image;(c) providing an array of icon focusing elements; and(d) providing the array of icon focusing elements relative to the icon layer so as to form at least one synthetically magnified image of at least a portion of the icons in each coextensive control pattern of icons, the at least one synthetically magnified image, which intersects with the at least one in-plane image, having one or more dynamic effects, wherein the one or more dynamic effects of the at least one synthetically magnified image are controlled and choreographed by the control patterns of icons.
  • 8. A method for forming an icon layer of an optical security device that includes a grayscale in-plane image, wherein the in-plane image has a boundary and an image area within the boundary that visually lies substantially in a plane of the substrate on which the in-plane image is carried, a plurality of control patterns of icons contained within the in-plane image thereby forming an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of the control patterns of icons, wherein the focusing elements are non-cylindrical refractive, reflective, or hybrid refractive/reflective focusing elements, wherein the synthetically magnified image intersects with the at least one in-plane image, the method comprising: selecting a grayscale in-plane image; and using the grayscale in-plane image to place the control patterns of icons within the in-plane image to together form the icon layer, wherein the choreography of the images is prescribed by the relative phasing of the control patterns and by the control pattern distribution, in addition to the nature of the grayscale in-plane image.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, which comprises: (a) selecting a grayscale in-plane image and scaling the grayscale image to a size that may be used in the icon layer;(b) superimposing a tiling onto the scaled grayscale in-plane image, the tiling comprising cells that will contain the control patterns of icons, wherein each cell has a preferred size similar to one or several focusing elements;(c) selecting a numerical range to represent the colors black and white and various levels of gray in between black and white;(d) determining the level of grayscale of the scaled grayscale in-plane image in each cell of the superimposed tiling;(e) assigning to each cell a number which represents the determined level of grayscale and which falls within the selected numerical range, wherein the assigned number is the cell's grayscale value;(f) selecting a number of control patterns of icons for use in a control pattern palette, and for each control pattern of icons, assigning a range of grayscale levels which fall within the selected numerical range;(g) specifying a control pattern probability distribution within the in-plane image and for each possible grayscale value, using the control patter probability distribution to assign a range of random numbers to each control pattern;(h) providing each cell in the tiling with a random number that falls with the selected numerical range using a random number generator;(i) determining which control pattern will be used to fill each cell using the cell's grayscale value and the cell's random number in conjunction with a mathematical construct which corresponds to the control pattern probability distribution; and(j) filling each cell with its determined control pattern of icons.
  • 10. A method for forming an icon layer of an optical security device that includes a sequence of grayscale in-plane images, wherein the in-plane image has a boundary and an image area within the boundary that visually lies substantially in a plane of the substrate on which the in-plane image is carried, a set of control patterns of icons for each in-plane image where each set of control patterns of icons is contained within its respective in-plane image together forming an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form an animation of synthetically magnified images of the control patterns of icons, wherein the focusing elements are non-cylindrical refractive, reflective, or hybrid refractive/reflective focusing elements, the synthetically magnified images intersecting with the grayscale in-plane images, the method comprising: selecting a sequence of grayscale in-plane images, selecting a set of control patterns of icons for each grayscale in-plane image wherein the choreography of the images is prescribed by the relative phasing of the control patterns and by the control pattern distribution, in addition to the nature of the grayscale in-plane image; and using the grayscale in-plane images to place its respective control patterns of icons within the in-plane image to form the icon layer.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, which comprises: (a) selecting a sequence of grayscale in-plane images that form an animation and scaling the grayscale images to a size that may be used in the icon layer;(b) superimposing a tiling onto each scaled grayscale in-plane image, the tiling comprising cells that will contain the control patterns of icons, wherein each cell has a preferred size similar to one or several focusing elements;(c) selecting a numerical range to represent the colors black and white and various levels of gray in between black and white;(d) determining the level of grayscale of the scaled grayscale in-plane image in each cell of the superimposed tiling;(e) assigning to each cell a number which represents the determined level of grayscale and which falls within the selected numerical range, wherein the assigned number is the cell's grayscale value;(f) for each grayscale in-plane image that forms the animation, selecting a number of control patterns of icons for use in a control pattern palette, and for each control pattern of icons, assigning a range of grayscale levels which fall within the selected numerical range, wherein the selected number of control patterns of icons constitutes a set of control patterns for the grayscale in-plane image, with each grayscale in-plane image having one set of control patterns of icons;(g) specifying, for each set of control patterns of icons, a control pattern probability distribution within the respective in-plane image and for each possible grayscale value, using the control pattern probability distribution to assign a range of random numbers to each control pattern;(h) providing each cell in the tiling with a random number that falls with the selected numerical range using a random number generator;(i) determining, for each set of control patterns, each set being assigned to a specific and different grayscale image, which control pattern will be used to fill each cell using the cell's grayscale value and the cells random number in conjunction with a mathematical construct which corresponds to the control pattern probability distribution; and(j) filling each cell with its determined control pattern of icons, each cell receiving a determined control pattern from each set of control patterns of icons.
  • 12. A method for increasing design space and reducing blurriness of images formed by an optical security device, the optical security device including at least one grayscale in-plane image, a plurality of control patterns of icons contained within the in-plane image forming an icon layer, and an array of icon focusing elements positioned to form at least one synthetically magnified image of the control patterns of icons, which intersects with the at least one in-plane image, wherein the focusing elements are non-cylindrical refractive, reflective, or hybrid refractive/reflective focusing elements, the method comprising: using at least one grayscale in-plane image, wherein the in-plane image has a boundary and an image area within the boundary that visually lies substantially in a plane of the substrate on which the in-plane image is carried; and using coordinated control patterns of icons on or within each in-plane image to control and choreograph one or more dynamic effects of the synthetically magnified images, wherein the choreography of the images is prescribed by the relative phasing of the control patterns and by the control pattern distribution, in addition to the nature of the grayscale in-plane image.
  • 13. A sheet material that is made from or employs the optical security device of claim 1.
  • 14. A base platform that is made from or employs the optical security device of claim 1.
  • 15. A document made from the sheet material of claim 13, or the base platform of claim 14.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/791,695, filed Mar. 15, 2013, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2014/028192 3/14/2014 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/143980 9/18/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (307)
Number Name Date Kind
992151 Berthon May 1911 A
1824353 Jensen Sep 1931 A
1849036 Ernst Mar 1932 A
1942841 Shimizu Jan 1934 A
2268351 Tanaka Dec 1941 A
2355902 Berg Aug 1944 A
2432896 Hotchner Dec 1947 A
2888855 Tanaka Jun 1959 A
2992103 Land et al. Jul 1961 A
3122853 Koonz et al. Mar 1964 A
3241429 Rice et al. Mar 1966 A
3264164 Jerothe et al. Aug 1966 A
3312006 Rowland Apr 1967 A
3357772 Rowland Dec 1967 A
3357773 Rowland Dec 1967 A
3463581 Clay Aug 1969 A
3609035 Ataka Sep 1971 A
3643361 Eaves Feb 1972 A
3704068 Waly Nov 1972 A
3801183 Sevelin et al. Apr 1974 A
3811213 Eaves May 1974 A
3887742 Reinnagel Jun 1975 A
4025673 Reinnagel May 1977 A
4073650 Yevick Feb 1978 A
4082426 Brown Apr 1978 A
4185191 Stauffer Jan 1980 A
4345833 Siegmund Aug 1982 A
4417784 Knop et al. Nov 1983 A
4498736 Griffin Feb 1985 A
4507349 Fromson et al. Mar 1985 A
4519632 Parkinson et al. May 1985 A
4534398 Crane Aug 1985 A
4634220 Hockert et al. Jan 1987 A
4645301 Orensteen et al. Feb 1987 A
4662651 Mowry, Jr. May 1987 A
4688894 Hockert Aug 1987 A
4691993 Porter et al. Sep 1987 A
4756972 Kloosterboer et al. Jul 1988 A
4765656 Becker et al. Aug 1988 A
4814594 Drexler Mar 1989 A
4892336 Kaule et al. Jan 1990 A
4892385 Webster, Jr. et al. Jan 1990 A
4920039 Fotland et al. Apr 1990 A
4935335 Fotland Jun 1990 A
4988126 Heckenkamp et al. Jan 1991 A
5044707 Mallik Sep 1991 A
5074649 Hamanaka Dec 1991 A
5085514 Mallik et al. Feb 1992 A
5135262 Smith et al. Aug 1992 A
5142383 Mallik Aug 1992 A
5211424 Bliss May 1993 A
5215864 Laakmann Jun 1993 A
5232764 Oshima Aug 1993 A
5254390 Lu Oct 1993 A
5282650 Smith et al. Feb 1994 A
5359454 Steenblik et al. Oct 1994 A
5384861 Mattson et al. Jan 1995 A
5393099 D'Amato Feb 1995 A
5393590 Caspari Feb 1995 A
5413839 Chatwin et al. May 1995 A
5433807 Heckenkamp et al. Jul 1995 A
5438928 Chatwin et al. Aug 1995 A
5442482 Johnson et al. Aug 1995 A
5449200 Andric et al. Sep 1995 A
5460679 Abdel-Kader Oct 1995 A
5461495 Steenblik et al. Oct 1995 A
5464690 Boswell Nov 1995 A
5468540 Lu Nov 1995 A
5479507 Anderson Dec 1995 A
5492370 Chatwin et al. Feb 1996 A
5503902 Steenblik et al. Apr 1996 A
5538753 Antes et al. Jul 1996 A
5543942 Mizuguchi et al. Aug 1996 A
5555476 Suzuki et al. Sep 1996 A
5567276 Boehm et al. Oct 1996 A
5568313 Steenblik et al. Oct 1996 A
5574083 Brown et al. Nov 1996 A
5575507 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1996 A
5598281 Zimmerman et al. Jan 1997 A
5623347 Pizzanelli Apr 1997 A
5623368 Calderini et al. Apr 1997 A
5626969 Jason May 1997 A
5631039 Knight et al. May 1997 A
5639126 Dames et al. Jun 1997 A
5642226 Rosenthal Jun 1997 A
5643678 Boswell Jul 1997 A
5670003 Boswell Sep 1997 A
5670096 Lu Sep 1997 A
5674580 Boswell Oct 1997 A
5688587 Burchard et al. Nov 1997 A
5695346 Sekiguchi et al. Dec 1997 A
5712731 Drinkwater et al. Jan 1998 A
5723200 Oshima et al. Mar 1998 A
5731064 Süss Mar 1998 A
5737126 Lawandy Apr 1998 A
5753349 Boswell May 1998 A
5759683 Boswell Jun 1998 A
5763349 Zandona Jun 1998 A
5783017 Boswell Jul 1998 A
5783275 Mück et al. Jul 1998 A
5800907 Yumoto Sep 1998 A
5810957 Boswell Sep 1998 A
5812313 Johansen et al. Sep 1998 A
5886798 Staub et al. Mar 1999 A
5933276 Magee Aug 1999 A
5949420 Terlutter Sep 1999 A
5995638 Amidror et al. Nov 1999 A
6030691 Burchard et al. Feb 2000 A
6036230 Farber Mar 2000 A
6036233 Braun et al. Mar 2000 A
6060143 Tompkin et al. May 2000 A
6084713 Rosenthal Jul 2000 A
6089614 Howland et al. Jul 2000 A
6106950 Searle et al. Aug 2000 A
6176582 Grasnick Jan 2001 B1
6177953 Vachette et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179338 Bergmann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195150 Silverbrook Feb 2001 B1
6249588 Amidror et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256149 Rolfe Jul 2001 B1
6256150 Rosenthal Jul 2001 B1
6283509 Braun et al. Sep 2001 B1
6288842 Florczak et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297911 Nishikawa et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301363 Mowry, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6302989 Kaule Oct 2001 B1
6328342 Belousov et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329040 Oshima et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329987 Gottfried et al. Dec 2001 B1
6345104 Rhoads Feb 2002 B1
6348999 Summersgill et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350036 Hannington et al. Feb 2002 B1
6369947 Staub et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373965 Liang Apr 2002 B1
6381071 Dona et al. Apr 2002 B1
6404555 Nishikawa Jun 2002 B1
6405464 Gulick, Jr. et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414794 Rosenthal Jul 2002 B1
6424467 Goggins Jul 2002 B1
6433844 Li Aug 2002 B2
6450540 Kim Sep 2002 B1
6467810 Taylor et al. Oct 2002 B2
6473238 Daniell Oct 2002 B1
6483644 Gottfried et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500526 Hannington Dec 2002 B1
6521324 Debe et al. Feb 2003 B1
6542646 Bar-Yona Apr 2003 B1
6558009 Hannington et al. May 2003 B2
6587276 Daniell Jul 2003 B2
6616803 Isherwood et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618201 Nishikawa et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641270 Hannington et al. Nov 2003 B2
6671095 Summersgill et al. Dec 2003 B2
6712399 Drinkwater et al. Mar 2004 B1
6721101 Daniell Apr 2004 B2
6724536 Magee Apr 2004 B2
6726858 Andrews Apr 2004 B2
6751024 Rosenthal Jun 2004 B1
6761377 Taylor et al. Jul 2004 B2
6795250 Johnson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6803088 Kaminsky et al. Oct 2004 B2
6819775 Amidror et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833960 Scarbrough et al. Dec 2004 B1
6856462 Scarbrough et al. Feb 2005 B1
6870681 Magee Mar 2005 B1
6900944 Tomczyk May 2005 B2
6926764 Bleikolm et al. Aug 2005 B2
6935756 Sewall et al. Aug 2005 B2
7030997 Neureuther et al. Apr 2006 B2
7058202 Amidror Jun 2006 B2
7068434 Florczak et al. Jun 2006 B2
7114750 Alasia et al. Oct 2006 B1
7194105 Hersch et al. Mar 2007 B2
7246824 Hudson Jul 2007 B2
7254265 Naske et al. Aug 2007 B2
7255911 Lutz et al. Aug 2007 B2
7288320 Steenblik et al. Oct 2007 B2
7333268 Steenblik et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336422 Dunn et al. Feb 2008 B2
7359120 Raymond et al. Apr 2008 B1
7372631 Ozawa May 2008 B2
7389939 Jones et al. Jun 2008 B2
7422781 Gosselin Sep 2008 B2
7457038 Dolgoff Nov 2008 B2
7457039 Raymond et al. Nov 2008 B2
7468842 Steenblik et al. Dec 2008 B2
7504147 Hannington Mar 2009 B2
7545567 Tomczyk Jun 2009 B2
7609450 Niemuth Oct 2009 B2
7630954 Adamczyk et al. Dec 2009 B2
7686187 Pottish et al. Mar 2010 B2
7712623 Wentz et al. May 2010 B2
7719733 Schilling et al. May 2010 B2
7738175 Steenblik et al. Jun 2010 B2
7744002 Jones et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751608 Hersch et al. Jul 2010 B2
7762591 Schilling et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763179 Levy et al. Jul 2010 B2
7812935 Cowburn et al. Oct 2010 B2
7820269 Staub et al. Oct 2010 B2
7830627 Commander et al. Nov 2010 B2
7849993 Finkenzeller et al. Dec 2010 B2
8027093 Commander et al. Sep 2011 B2
8057980 Dunn et al. Nov 2011 B2
8111463 Endle et al. Feb 2012 B2
8149511 Kaule et al. Apr 2012 B2
8241732 Hansen et al. Aug 2012 B2
8284492 Crane et al. Oct 2012 B2
8367452 Soma et al. Feb 2013 B2
8514492 Schilling et al. Aug 2013 B2
8528941 Dörfler et al. Sep 2013 B2
8537470 Endle et al. Sep 2013 B2
8557369 Hoffmüller et al. Oct 2013 B2
8693101 Tomczyk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8867134 Steenblik et al. Oct 2014 B2
8908276 Holmes Dec 2014 B2
9802437 Holmes Oct 2017 B2
20010048968 Cox et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020014967 Crane et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020114078 Halle et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020167485 Hedrick Nov 2002 A1
20020185857 Taylor et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030031861 Reiter et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030112523 Daniell Jun 2003 A1
20030157211 Tsunetomo et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030179364 Steenblik et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030183695 Labrec et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030228014 Alasia et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030232179 Steenblik et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030234294 Uchihiro et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040020086 Hudson Feb 2004 A1
20040022967 Lutz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040065743 Doublet Apr 2004 A1
20040100707 Kay et al. May 2004 A1
20040140665 Scarborough et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040209049 Bak Oct 2004 A1
20050094274 Souparis May 2005 A1
20050104364 Keller et al. May 2005 A1
20050161501 Giering et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050180020 Steenblik et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050247794 Jones et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060003295 Hersch et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060011449 Knoll Jan 2006 A1
20060017979 Goggins Jan 2006 A1
20060018021 Tompkins et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060061267 Yamasaki et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060227427 Dolgoff Oct 2006 A1
20070058260 Steenblik et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070092680 Chaffins et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070164555 Mang et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183045 Shilling et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070183047 Phillips et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070273143 Crane et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070284546 Ryzi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070291362 Hill et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080130018 Steenblik et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143095 Isherwood et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160226 Kaule et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080182084 Tompkin et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090008923 Kaule et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090061159 Staub et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090243278 Camus et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090261572 Bleikolm et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090290221 Hansen et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090310470 Yrjonen Dec 2009 A1
20090315316 Staub et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100001508 Tompkin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100018644 Sacks et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100045024 Attner et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100068459 Wang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100084851 Schilling Apr 2010 A1
20100103528 Endle et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100109317 Huffmuller et al. May 2010 A1
20100177094 Kaule et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100182221 Kaule et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100194532 Kaule Aug 2010 A1
20100208036 Kaule Aug 2010 A1
20100277805 Schilling et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100308571 Steenblik et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100328922 Peters et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017498 Lauffer et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110019283 Steenblik et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110045255 Jones et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110056638 Rosset Mar 2011 A1
20110179631 Gates et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120019607 Dunn et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120033305 Moon et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120091703 Maguire et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120098249 Rahm et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120194916 Cape et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120243744 Camus et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130003354 Meis et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130010048 Dunn et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130038942 Holmes Feb 2013 A1
20130044362 Commander et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130154250 Dunn et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130154251 Jolic Jun 2013 A1
20140174306 Wening et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140175785 Kaule et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140353959 Lochbihler Dec 2014 A1
20140367957 Jordan Dec 2014 A1
20150152602 Blake et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160101643 Cape et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160176221 Holmes Jun 2016 A1
20160257159 Attner et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160325577 Jordan Nov 2016 A1
20170015129 Jordan Jan 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (139)
Number Date Country
2009278275 Jul 2012 AU
2741298 Apr 2010 CA
1102865 May 1995 CN
1126970 Nov 2003 CN
1950570 Apr 2007 CN
101678664 Mar 2010 CN
19804858 Aug 1999 DE
19932240 Jan 2001 DE
10100692 Aug 2004 DE
0090130 Oct 1983 EP
0092691 Nov 1983 EP
0118222 Sep 1984 EP
0156460 Oct 1985 EP
0203752 Dec 1986 EP
0253089 Jan 1988 EP
0318717 Jun 1989 EP
0415230 Mar 1991 EP
0319157 Jul 1992 EP
0801324 Oct 1997 EP
0887699 Dec 1998 EP
0930174 Jul 1999 EP
0997750 May 2000 EP
1356952 Oct 2003 EP
1002640 May 2004 EP
1538554 Jun 2005 EP
1354925 Apr 2006 EP
1659449 May 2006 EP
1743778 Jan 2007 EP
1801636 Jun 2007 EP
1876028 Jan 2008 EP
1897700 Mar 2008 EP
1931827 Jan 2009 EP
2335937 Jun 2011 EP
2338682 Jun 2011 EP
2162294 Mar 2012 EP
2803939 Jul 2001 FR
2952194 May 2011 FR
1095286 Dec 1967 GB
2103669 Feb 1983 GB
2168372 Jun 1986 GB
2227451 Jan 1990 GB
2362493 Nov 2001 GB
2395724 Jun 2004 GB
2433470 Jun 2007 GB
2490780 Nov 2012 GB
41-004953 Mar 1966 JP
46-022600 Aug 1971 JP
04-234699 Aug 1992 JP
H05-508119 Nov 1993 JP
10-035083 Feb 1998 JP
10-039108 Feb 1998 JP
11-501590 Feb 1999 JP
11-189000 Jul 1999 JP
2000-056103 Feb 2000 JP
2000-233563 Aug 2000 JP
2000-256994 Sep 2000 JP
2001-055000 Feb 2001 JP
2001-516899 Oct 2001 JP
2001-324949 Nov 2001 JP
2003-039583 Feb 2003 JP
2003-165289 Jun 2003 JP
2003-528349 Sep 2003 JP
2003-326876 Nov 2003 JP
2004-262144 Sep 2004 JP
2004-317636 Nov 2004 JP
2005-193501 Jul 2005 JP
2009-274293 Nov 2009 JP
2011-502811 Jan 2011 JP
10-0194536 Jun 1999 KR
2002170350000 Mar 2001 KR
2003119050000 May 2003 KR
1005443000000 Jan 2006 KR
1005613210000 Mar 2006 KR
10-2008-0048578 Jun 2008 KR
2111125 May 1998 RU
2245566 Jan 2005 RU
2010101854 Jul 2011 RU
575740 Feb 2004 TW
WO 1992008998 May 1992 WO
WO 1992019994 Nov 1992 WO
WO 1993024332 Dec 1993 WO
WO 1996035971 Nov 1996 WO
WO 1997019820 Jun 1997 WO
WO 1997044769 Nov 1997 WO
WO 1998013211 Apr 1998 WO
WO 1998015418 Apr 1998 WO
WO 1998026373 Jun 1998 WO
WO 1999014725 Mar 1999 WO
WO 1999023513 May 1999 WO
WO 1999026793 Jun 1999 WO
WO 1999066356 Dec 1999 WO
WO 2001007268 Feb 2001 WO
WO 2001011591 Feb 2001 WO
WO 2001039138 Jun 2001 WO
WO 2001053113 Jul 2001 WO
WO 2001063341 Aug 2001 WO
WO 2001071410 Sep 2001 WO
WO 2002040291 May 2002 WO
WO 2002043012 May 2002 WO
WO 2002101669 Dec 2002 WO
WO 2003005075 Jan 2003 WO
WO 2003007276 Jan 2003 WO
WO 2003022598 Mar 2003 WO
WO 2003053713 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2003061980 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2003061983 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2003082598 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2003098188 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004022355 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004036507 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004087430 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005106601 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006029744 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2007076952 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007133613 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008049632 May 2008 WO
WO 2009000527 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009000528 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009000529 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009000530 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009118946 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009121784 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2010015383 Feb 2010 WO
WO 2010094961 Aug 2010 WO
WO 2010099571 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010136339 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011015384 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011019912 Feb 2011 WO
WO 2011044704 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011051669 May 2011 WO
WO 2011107793 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2011122943 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2012027779 Mar 2012 WO
WO 2012027779 Mar 2012 WO
WO 2012103441 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2013028534 Feb 2013 WO
WO 2013093848 Jun 2013 WO
WO 2013098513 Jul 2013 WO
WO 2016063050 Apr 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Amidror, “A Generalized Fourier-Based Method for the Analysis of 2D Moiré Envelope-Forms in Screen Superpositions”, Journal of Modern Optics (London, GB), vol. 41, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1994, pp. 1837-1862, ISSN: 0950-0340.
Dunn, et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual Images for Security Applications”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, (published Jun. 3, 2004), Proc. SPIE 5310.
Muke, “Embossing of Optical Document Security Devices”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, (published Jun. 3, 2004), Proc. SPIE 5310.
Article: “Spherical Lenses” (Jan. 18, 2009); pp. 1-12; retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.physicsinsights.org/simple_optics_spherical_lenses-1.html.
Drinkwater, K. John, et al., “Development and applications of Diffractive Optical Security Devices for Banknotes and High Value Documents”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 66-79, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA.
Fletcher, D.A., et al., “Near-field infrared imaging with a microfabricated solid immersion lens”, Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 2, 2000, pp. 2109-2111, vol. 77, No. 14.
Gale, M. T., et al., Chapter 6—Replication, Micro Optics: Elements, Systems and Applications, 1997, pp. 153-177.
Hardwick, Bruce and Ghioghiu Ana, “Guardian Substrate As An Optical Medium for Security Devices”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 176-179, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA.
Hutley, M.C., et al., “The Moire Magnifier”, Pure Appl. Opt. 3, 1994, pp. 133-142, IOP Publishing Ltd., UK.
Hutley, M.C., “Integral Photography, Superlenses and the Moire Magnifier”, European Optical Society, 1993, pp. 72-75, vol. 2, UK.
Hutley, M., et al., “Microlens Arrays”, Physics World, Jul. 1991, pp. 27-32.
Kamal, H., et al., “Properties of Moiré Magnifiers”, Opt. Eng., Nov. 1998, pp. 3007-3014, vol. 37, No. 11.
Leech, Patrick W., et al., Printing via hot embossing of optically variable images in thermoplastic acrylic lacquer, Microelectronic Engineering, 2006, pp. 1961-1965, vol. 83, No. 10, Elsevier Publishers BV, Amsterdam, NL.
Lippmann, G., “Photgraphie—Épreuves Réversibles, Photographies Intégrals”, Académie des Sciences, 1908, pp. 146-451, vol. 146, Paris.
Liu, S. et al. “Artistic Effects and Application of Moiré Patterns in Security Holograms”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1995, pp. 4700-4702, vol. 34, No. 22.
Phillips, Roger W., et al., Security Enhancement of Holograms with Interference Coatings, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 304-316, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA.
Steenblik, Richard A., et al., UNISON Micro-optic Security Film, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, 2004, pp. 321-327, SPIE vol. 5310, San Jose, CA.
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 1994, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA.
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 1998, 2nd edition, pp. 232-235, 240-241 and 320-321, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA (ISBN 0-89006-982-4).
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 2005, 3rd edition, pp. 62-169, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA (ISBN 1-58053-258-6).
Wolpert, Gary R., Design and development of an effective optical variable device based security system incorporating additional synergistic security technologies, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 55-61, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA.
Zhang, X., et al., “Concealed Holographic Coding for Security Applications by Using a Moiré Technique”, Applied Optics, Nov. 1997, pp. 8096-8097, vol. 36, No. 31.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160009119 A1 Jan 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61791695 Mar 2013 US