Patent Application
20120053878
The present inventive concept relates to an automatic optical sighting system (AOSS) that may be used with an optical enhancement device, such as a telescopic sight for use with a civilian or military individual shoulder- or hand-fired firearm, or in any firearm classified as a line-of-sight or a “small arm” firearm that is on a mechanical mount for stability or portability.
To further complicate the basic problem, trajectory 115 may be affected by factors including gravity, distance to target (“range” herein), and weather conditions, such as atmospheric pressure, temperature, humidity and wind (i.e., ambient conditions), as well as other secondary factors discussed below. In order to hit target 112, a shooter must also adjust the orientation, or firing position, of firearm 111 to take into account each of the factors affecting trajectory 115.
Existing sighting systems for civilian, law enforcement, and military firearms that are used for adjusting the orientation of a firearm are limited by the training of the marksman to judge ambient conditions at the location and time when a shot is taken. Generally, a marksman must be very familiar with characteristics of the firearm, as well as ballistic performance characteristics of the ammunition under various conditions. Performance characteristics of the firearm and ammunition in ambient conditions at the time of firing are typically evaluated manually and processed mentally in order to determine sighting-system aiming point changes that the marksman deems necessary to produce the desired projectile point-of-impact. Further, due to variable target distances, atmospheric conditions and geographic conditions at the time of firing, a marksman must consider many variables in combination to determine the optimal sighting-system settings for hitting an intended target, thus presenting a difficult task. This is particularly true in military and law enforcement situations, but the same considerations also apply to hunters and target shooters in the civilian community.
Further difficulties in selecting a proper firing position are caused by secondary effects, such as Coriolis acceleration and Yaw of Repose deflection. Such secondary effects may have inconsequential effects on firing accuracy at shorter ranges, but can cause impact misses at long ranges. Recent developments in firearms and ammunition have made it possible to fire at targets that are very far (1000 meters or more) from a firing point, thereby increasing the importance of taking into account secondary effects for ballistic calculations. Additionally, in some military and law enforcement scenarios, range distances are shorter than 1000 meters, but targets appear very small, requiring secondary effects to be considered. Such stringent requirements for firing accuracy, in turn, place stringent requirements on a sighting system for mechanical and optical repeatability, accuracy, and computational algorithm precision and accuracy, which, in turn, places similarly stringent requirements on the collection accuracy of the corresponding raw data, such as range and ambient conditions.
The literature on firearms and projectile ballistics contains much information concerning accurately aiming a firearm. One automatic aiming system, in particular, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,252,706 B1 to Kaladgew, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
According to Kaladgew, stepper motors situated external to the body of a telescopic sight are used for adjusting an automatic aiming system. A significant drawback, however, is that in-field use, a problem of stepper motor failure caused by dirt and moisture or mud build-up between the body of the scope and the body of the firearm can prevent a stepper motor from producing a desired adjustment. Further, the Kaladgew system provides no manual override in the event of battery failure, motor failure or system-controller failure.
Other drawbacks that are associated with the Kaladgew system include that Kaladgew does not disclose how windage adjustments are made, i.e., how the data is collected and processed, and how commands to a windage stepper motor are generated. Target distance is measured by Kaladgew using a laser rangefinder mounted on the firearm, although no other techniques are disclosed for measuring or incorporating target distance in calculations. Kaladgew also does not address incorporation of secondary factors when calculating telescopic sight adjustments, which, as discussed above, can play a significant role in long-distance target shooting, or in situations in which extreme precision is required. Specific factors not considered by Kaladgew include (1) gyroscopic (six-degrees-of-freedom) effects on bullet flight; (2) parallax corrections for a telescope sight; (3) altitude and atmospheric condition effects on projectile trajectory, (4) corrections for wind effects, especially vertical wind effects; and (5) Coriolis effects.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,813,025 B1 to Edwards, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference, discloses use of electronic adjustment motors that power movement of internal parts, but does not disclose any details of the mechanical interface between a motor and a corresponding adjuster that is to be adjusted on a telescopic sight. Edwards also provides telescopic sight adjustments through user-activated switches. By gathering data from an objective module that displays various data, a user may interpret the gathered data, and then activate one or more switches that are controlled by finger movements, which, in turn, cause telescopic sight adjustments to be made. Edwards provides no provision for automatic adjustment of telescopic sight adjustments through microprocessor system-initiated signals linked directly to adjustment motors. Additionally, Edwards provides no manual override for adjusting a telescopic sight in the event of electrical failure. Further, Edwards does not calculate or implement corrections for secondary effects (e.g., Coriolis Effect, gyroscopic effects) that may have significant impact on accuracy in long-range target situations.
Thus, a major drawback of both Kaladgew and Edwards is that neither automatically solves the equations of motion of a projectile from a muzzle to a target in near real time and, under all applicable conditions of firing, provides correct aiming adjustments to a sighting system based on the automatically solved equations to impact the target.
Another serious drawback of both Kaladgew and Edwards is that neither patent makes use of feedback information related to a state of at least one optical adjustment to either (1) enable the corresponding adjustor to accomplish a commanded adjustment quickly and accurately, or (2) confirm to the firearm operator that the commanded adjustment has been accomplished before firing the firearm.
Consequently, what is needed is a way to automatically solve the equations of motion of a projectile from a muzzle to a target in near real time and, under all applicable conditions of firing, provide correct aiming adjustments to a sighting system based on the automatically solved equations in order to impact the target. What is also needed is a system that utilizes feedback information related to a state of at least one optical adjustment to either (1) enable the corresponding adjustor to accomplish a commanded adjustment quickly and accurately, or (2) confirm to the firearm operator that the commanded adjustment has been accomplished before firing the firearm.
The present inventive concept automatically solves the equations of motion of a projectile from a muzzle to a target in near real time and, under all applicable conditions of firing, provides correct aiming adjustments to a sighting system based on the automatically solved equations in order to impact the target, all of which facilitate rapid aiming of the firearm under operational conditions in the field. The present inventive concept also provides a system that utilizes feedback information related to a state of at least one optical adjustment to either (1) enable the corresponding adjustor to accomplish a commanded adjustment quickly and accurately, or (2) confirm to the firearm operator that the commanded adjustment has been accomplished before firing the firearm.
Additionally, the present inventive concept provides an automatic optical sighting system that includes an adjustable optical system, at least one sensor and a processor. The adjustable optical system includes at least one optical adjustment. Each sensor detects a condition that affects a trajectory of a projectile between an origin and a selected target and generates an indication of the detected condition. At least one sensor is one of a crosswind sensor, a vertical wind sensor and a longitudinal wind sensor, a rangefinder, an inclination angle sensor, a temperature sensor, a barometer, a hygrometer, and a magnetic compass. The processor receives information related to each detected condition and information related to a state of at least one optical adjustment. The processor determines at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system including at least one of an elevation adjustment, a windage adjustment, and a parallax adjustment based on at least one detected condition and the information related to the state of at least one optical adjustment so that the projectile will have a trajectory between the origin and the selected target that helps the projectile to hit the target. The processor further generates control signals that control each optical adjustment of the adjustable optical system. The processor can further determine at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system that is based on a secondary factor that affects the trajectory of the projectile between the origin and the selected target, the secondary factor being related to one of a Coriolis effect and a gyroscopic effect. The processor can also further determine at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system based on one of a three-degrees-of-freedom model, a modified three-degrees-of-freedom model or a six-degrees-of-freedom model of the projectile.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present inventive concept, the automatic optical sighting system further includes at least one actuator corresponding to each optical adjustment of the optical system such that each actuator is mechanically coupled to the corresponding optical adjustment, and an actuator controller corresponding to each actuator, such that each actuator controller controls the corresponding actuator in response to a corresponding control signal generated by the processor for the optical adjustment.
In another exemplary embodiment, at least one actuator can be manually overridden for making an optical adjustment to the optical system. In yet another exemplary embodiment, at least one optical adjustment of the optical system includes a coarse optical adjustment and a fine optical adjustment.
The present inventive concept also provides a method for automatically determining optical adjustments to an optical sighting system having at least one optical adjustment in which a condition indication signal is generated that is based on a detected condition that affects the trajectory of a projectile between an origin and a selected target, a state indication signal is generated based on a state of an optical adjustment of the optical sighting system, and at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system is determined based on at least one condition indication signal and one state indication signal so that the projectile will have a trajectory between the origin and the selected target that helps the projectile to hit the target.
Further, the present inventive concept provides a computer-readable storage medium containing a set of machine-executable instruction for performing a method for automatically determining optical adjustments to an optical sighting system having at least one optical adjustment, such that the method includes receiving a condition indication signal based on a detected condition that affects the trajectory of a projectile between an origin and a selected target, receiving a state indication signal based on a state of an optical adjustment of the optical sighting system, and determining at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system based on at least one received condition indication and at least one received state indication signal so that the projectile will have a trajectory between the origin and the selected target that helps the projectile to hit the target.
Yet another exemplary embodiment of an automatic optical sighting system includes an adjustable optical system, at least one sensor, a processor and a housing. The adjustable optical system has at least one optical adjustment. Each sensor detects a condition that affects a trajectory of a projectile between an origin and a selected target and generates an indication of the detected condition. At least one sensor is one of a crosswind sensor, a vertical wind sensor, a longitudinal wind sensor, a rangefinder, an inclination angle sensor, a temperature sensor, a barometer, a hygrometer, and a magnetic compass. The processor receives information related to each detected condition and determines at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system based on at least one detected condition so that the projectile will have a trajectory between the origin and the selected target that helps the projectile to hit the target. The housing contains at least one actuator. The actuator corresponds to an optical adjustment of the optical system and is responsive to the determination of the processor by adjusting the optical adjustment based on the determination. The actuator is located internal to the housing. At least one actuator can be a stepper motor or a servo motor. Additionally, at least one actuator can be manually overridden for making an optical adjustment to the optical system. Further still, at least one optical adjustment of the optical system includes a coarse optical adjustment and a fine optical adjustment.
The present inventive concept also provides a method of manufacturing an automatic optical sighting system that includes providing an adjustable optical system having at least one optical adjustment, providing at least one sensor such that each sensor detects a condition that affects a trajectory of a projectile between an origin and a selected target and generates an indication of the detected condition, and providing a processor receiving information related to each detected condition and information related to a state of at least one optical adjustment, the processor determining at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system based on at least one detected condition and the state of the at least one optical adjustment so that the projectile will have a trajectory between the origin and the selected target that helps the projectile to hit the target.
Still further, the present inventive concept provides a method of manufacturing an automatic optical sighting system that includes providing an adjustable optical system having at least one optical adjustment, providing at least one sensor such that each sensor detecting a condition that affects a trajectory of a projectile between an origin and a selected target and generating an indication of the detected condition, providing a processor and providing a housing. The processor receives information related to each detected condition and determines at least one adjustment for the adjustable optical system based on at least one detected condition so that the projectile will have a trajectory between the origin and the selected target that helps the projectile to hit the target. The housing contains at least one actuator. The actuator corresponds to an optical adjustment of the optical system and is responsive to the determination of the processor by adjusting the optical adjustment based on the determination. The actuator is located internal to the housing.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not by limitation in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
The present inventive concept provides an automatic optical sighting system (AOSS). When used with a firearm, the AOSS of the present inventive concept automatically performs one or more aiming adjustments, thereby eliminating the need for a marksman to estimate the effects of, for example, range to the target, ambient weather conditions, direction of the target from the firearm, inclination angle of fire, and projectile characteristics. Additionally, exemplary embodiments of the present inventive concept provide automatic aiming adjustments that are necessary for compensating for one or more secondary effects that may affect accuracy of projectile impact at range distances in excess of about 800 meters, as well as accuracy of projectile impact for smaller targets at closer range distances. The exemplary embodiments of the present inventive concept also allow a manual override of one or more adjusters that adjust, for example, elevation, windage, or parallax, in the event of an electrical system failure, adjustment motor failure, and/or processor system failure. Representative embodiments of the present inventive concept are shown in
Sensor subsystem 201 includes sensors that detect the magnitude of physical parameters that affect the trajectory of a projectile, such as, but not limited to, the range and inclination angle of a target, weather conditions, such as ambient temperature, barometric pressure, humidity, wind speed and direction, firing direction, and geographic location. The term “sensor,” as used herein, means a device that measures one or more physical quantities and produces an output signal that corresponds to the detected physical quantity. While sensor subsystem 201 is referred to herein as having a plurality of sensors, it should be understood that sensor subsystem can have as few as one sensor. The output of a sensor can accordingly be analog and/or a digital signal. The outputs of sensor subsystem 201 are coupled to the input of processor and controller subsystem 202.
Processor and controller subsystem 202 processes the output received from sensor subsystem 201 for determining adjustments that should be made to optical system 204 so that a projectile hits the intended point-of-impact at the target. Based on the determined adjustments, processor and controller subsystem 202 generates signals corresponding to the determined adjustments and output the signals to actuator system 203 and/or displays determined adjustment value results for manual input. In one exemplary embodiment, processor and controller subsystem 202 is a microprocessor-based system that includes memory and other peripheral-type devices that are necessary for the microprocessor-based system to receive data, store and execute machine-executable instructions, process data, and output signals and data corresponding to the processed data. For example, processor and controller subsystem 202 can include Random Access Memory (RAM), Read-Only Memory (ROM), input/output (I/O) devices such as, but not limited to, keyboard/keypads, thumbwheels, touch screens, data input ports, input and output signal conditioner devices, data display devices, and machine-executable instructions for processing data input to subsystem 202. In alternative embodiments, processor and controller subsystem 202 can be configured as one or more Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) and/or one or more state machines.
Actuator subsystem 203 converts the signals received from processor and controller subsystem 202 into mechanical motion for repositioning adjusters of optical system 204.
Optical system 204 includes optical elements, such as a telescopic sight, and associated components, such as focusing lenses, reticles, adjusters for adjusting optical adjustments, for example, elevation, crossrange (also referred to as “windage”) and/or parallax of the telescopic sight.
Also shown in
One exemplary embodiment of sensor subsystem 201 includes a rangefinder 301, an inclination angle sensor 302, a temperature sensor 303, a barometer 304, a hygrometer 305, a magnetic compass 306, a crosswind sensor 307, a vertical wind sensor 308, and a headwind/tailwind (longitudinal wind) sensor 309. Rangefinder 301 provides distance information relating to a target. Inclination angle sensor 302 provides angle of inclination information of the target with respect to a local level at the firing point of a firearm. Temperature sensor 303 provides information relating to the ambient temperature in the vicinity of AOSS 200. Barometer 304 provides information relating to the ambient atmospheric pressure in the vicinity of AOSS 200. Hygrometer 305 provides information relating the ambient humidity in the vicinity of AOSS 200. Magnetic compass 306 provides geographic point direction information based on the detected magnetic field of the earth. Crosswind sensor 307 provides cross, or horizontal, wind-speed information in the vicinity of AOSS 200. Vertical wind sensor 308 provides vertical wind-speed information in the vicinity of AOSS 200. Headwind/tailwind sensor 309 provides headwind/tailwind (longitudinal) speed information in the vicinity of AOSS 200.
Additionally, sensor subsystem 201 can include a global positioning system (GPS) receiver 310 for providing global position information for determining adjustments that must be made to optical subsystem 204. Details regarding use of a GPS receiver 310 are described further below.
Sensors 301-310 may be commercially available, or may be fabricated for a specific use or measurement, and output the respective measured quantities in either an analog or a digital form. An alternative embodiment of sensor system 201 could have more or fewer sensors.
Processor and controller subsystem 202 receives sensor signals output from sensor subsystem 201 and feedback signals from sensors associated with adjustors 322-324. Depending on the characteristics of a particular sensor output signal or a feedback signal, sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 may be used to buffer, convert, scale, level shift, etc., the output signal or feedback signal so that it is usable by processor 312 to automatically determine the adjustments that are necessary to the optical parameters of optical system 204 in order to hit a target. Additionally, sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 can convert the units of measure of a particular sensor output signal or feedback signal from one unit of measurement to another unit of measurement for use by processor 312.
More specifically, sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 provides a conditioning interface between sensor subsystem 201 and processor 312 and between sensors associated with adjustors 322-324 and processor 312 so that processor 312 can utilize the sensor signals. For example, when a sensor provides an analog output, sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 converts the analog signal to a digital signal in a well-known manner by providing an analog-to-digital converter (A/DC) function. When a sensor output can be used directly by processor 312, sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 may not be necessary except, perhaps, for a well-known signal buffering function. If necessary, sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 could also provide signal-scaling and level-shifting functions in a well-known manner, regardless whether the sensor signal is an analog or a digital signal.
Sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 could also provide an interface to receive sensor output signals that are transmitted to processor and controller subsystem 202 through a wired connection and/or a wireless connection such as an infrared (IR) signals or radio frequency (RF) signals. Thus, selected sensors of sensor system 201 could be remotely located from other functional subsystems and components of AOSS 200. For example, wind sensors 307-308 might be located in a remote position that better measures the wind parameters than if they were located in close proximity to the other components of AOSS 200. Output signals from the remotely located wind sensors could be transmitted to sensor interface and signal conditioner 311 using a wired link and/or a wireless link, such as an IR signal and/or an RF signal. Moreover, a sensor output signal could be specially configured to include, for example, frequency-hopping characteristics, so that it is not easily detected and its source located.
Processor 312 receives sensor output signals from sensor subsystem 201 and from sensors associated with adjustors 322-324 and automatically determines the adjustments that are necessary to the optical parameters of optical system 204 in order to hit the intended point-of-impact at the target based on the received sensor output signals. Processor 312 could be embodied as a microprocessor-based system that includes peripheral components, such as RAM and ROM memory and I/O devices. Alternatively, processor 312 could be embodied as a multi-processor-based system. As yet another alternative, processor 312 could be configured as a state machine. As still another alternative embodiment, processor 312 can be configured as a combination of a microprocessor-based system and a state machine.
When processor 312 is embodied as a microprocessor-based or a multi-processor-based system, processor 312 includes machine-executable instructions that are used in a well-known manner to automatically determine the adjustments that are necessary to the optical parameters of optical system 204. A descriptive outline of exemplary machine-executable instructions that can be executed by a microprocessor-based or multi-processor based system is provided elsewhere in this detailed description.
Additionally, a display device 313 can display selected information to a user. One exemplary embodiment of a suitable display device is a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD). Another exemplary embodiment of a suitable display device is a touch-screen LCD that can be used to receive data that is manually input by a user.
Data input port 314 provides an I/O interface for a manual input device, such as a keyboard, a keypad, a thumbwheel and/or a remote processing system. Data input port 314 can have wired and/or wireless functionality. As shown in
Processor 312 generates signals corresponding to the automatically determined adjustments and outputs the control signals to actuator controllers 316, 317 and 318 for controlling the optical adjustments of optical system 204 in order to hit a target. It should be understood that processor 312 could be remotely located from actuator controllers 316-318, or processor 312 and actuator controllers 316-318 are remotely located from actuators 319-321. Accordingly, control signals output from processor 312 and input to actuator controllers 316-318 and/or output from actuator controllers 316-318 and input to actuators 319-321 can be made over a wireline and/or wireless connection, such as an infrared (IR) connection and/or a radio frequency (RF) connection.
Processor 312 receives, for example, target range information, angle of incline from firearm to the target, ambient temperature, barometric pressure, relative humidity, geographic direction of target, cross wind magnitude, vertical wind magnitude, and longitudinal wind magnitude (headwind or tailwind) from sensor subsystem 201. Additional sensors may also provide input for other parameters that may affect projectile motion. Alternatively, output of range finder 301 may be read by the user through a visual display (not shown), and manually input by the user through a manual input device 315, such as a keyboard, a keypad, a thumbwheel and/or touchscreen display. Similarly, in an alternative embodiment, wind magnitude along each of the three axes (vertical, crossrange, longitudinal) may be estimated by a user and input to processor and controller subsystem 202 through a manual input device 315, such as a keyboard, a keypad, a thumbwheel and/or touchscreen display. Additionally, a user may input information relating to ballistic characteristics of the projectile through manual input device 315. For example, processor and controller subsystem may contain data tables so that a user only needs to input projectile identification information through manual input device 315.
Processor and controller subsystem 202 determines and generates control signals for controlling actuator subsystem 203, which, in turn, controls the elevation, cross range and/or parallax adjustments of optical subsystem 204. Processor and controller subsystem 202 also receives feedback signals from sensors associated with adjustors 322-324 that respectively indicate a position, or state, of an adjustor. Processor and controller subsystem 202 uses the feedback signals for determining whether actuators 319-321 have adjusted adjustors 322-324 in accordance with the adjustment control signals and for determining whether actuators 319-324 are properly responding to the adjustment control signals respectively output from controllers 316-318. When actuator subsystem 203 includes two-stage actuators, that is, coarse and fine adjustment actuators, processor and controller subsystem 202 generates appropriate signals for controlling both the coarse and fine adjustment actuators.
For each of the dynamic models, wind conditions, air density, speed of sound and gravitational acceleration are determined at the instantaneous position of the projectile in flight.
After trajectory determination is complete, aiming adjustments for elevation actuator 319 and crossrange actuator 320 are determined at 2006. The AOSS determines deviation from a “home” position of the actuators that may be determined based on pre-mission test firing of the telescopic sight. Appropriate control signals are sent to elevation actuator 319 at 2007 and the crossrange actuator 320 at 2008.
At 2009, parallax adjustment is determined for nulling parallax for the target distance. At 2010, the parallax adjustment signal is sent to the parallax adjustment actuator 321. Parallax adjustment determination and adjustment can be performed simultaneously or sequentially with the determination for elevation and crossrange adjustments.
The exemplary embodiment of AOSS 200 shown in
Sensor subsystem 201, processor and controller subsystem 202, and power supply 325 in whole or in part may be remotely located. Processor determination results may be displayed on the remote subsystem 202 via display device 313 with actuator subsystem 203 signals transmitted to actuator subsystem 203 and optical subsystem 204 via hardwire, IR, or RF methods. Manual adjustments of optical subsystem 204 may also be made via elevation adjustment 322, windage adjustment 323, and parallax adjustment 324 with corresponding manual adjustments of embodiments depicted in
Operation of AOSS 200 is as follows. A marksman determines the mission-specific ammunition that will be used. The marksman then inputs (or e.g., retrieves from electronic memory or other storage) the ammunition characteristics and firing point location information into electronic memory of the processor and controller subsystem 202 (or selects the information from memory) typically through data input port 314, or alternatively manually inputs projectile flight data and/or ambient conditions through manual input device 315 and/or display device 313.
Before executing a mission, the marksman typically test fires the firearm to verify proper operation of the system over its designed operational range. To typically operate the system, the marksman determines the target range, typically via, e.g., optical or laser rangefinders. Alternatively the shooter may estimate the target distance. This information may be input through data input port 314, manual input device 315 and/or display device 313, or may be measured by AOSS rangefinder 301 and input directly from rangefinder 301. Just before the shot, the marksman depresses a “start” button (not shown) which may be part of manual input device 315 or can be located elsewhere. The start button signals the AOSS to either make measurements via sensor subsystem 201, use manually input information, or a combination of both and send the results to processor and controller subsystem 202.
Processor and controller subsystem 202 determines the adjustments to optical system 204 that are required for a proper ballistic flight path of the projectile based on the measured range and other sensor measurements. Upon completion of the adjustment determinations, processor and controller subsystem 202 outputs control signals that control actuators 319-321 and adjustors 322-324, thereby positioning the reticle aiming point and lenses at the proper orientation to direct the projectile to its intended point of impact at the target. The position of each of the actuators and/or adjusters may be verified by a respective optical/digital encoder (not shown), and the adjuster may be re-adjusted if necessary.
When the adjustment sequence is complete, a “green” light emitting diode (LED) (not shown) or other applicable indicating device may be illuminated to signal the marksman that the firing sequence may be initiated, i.e., a shot may be fired. After a shot is fired, a follow-up shot may be taken within a predetermined period of time programmed into the AOSS system memory, prior to automatic resetting of the AOSS system. Automatic resetting of the system returns adjusters for elevation, cross range, and parallax to their respective “home” positions, i.e., the positions prior to the AOSS system generated adjustment. Automatic resetting may be overridden via, for example, manual input device 315, if desired.
The front portion of the optical sight 601 is mounted in a pivot ring assembly 650 with horizontal trunnion pins (left trunnion pin 652 is shown in
The mechanisms depicted in
When a coarse vertical adjustment is needed to place a target image within optical parameters of the lens system so that the target is visible by the shooter looking into the scope, coarse adjustment actuator 663 rotates worm gear 664 that rotates eccentric cam 665, lifting or depressing the cam ring 661 and the fixedly attached sighting system.
Optical adjustment subsystem 1000 also includes an automatic/manual selection knob 1008, an index ring 1009 and a spring-loaded ratchet 1010. Automatic selection knob 1008 allows a user to select whether the rotational position of optical adjustment subsystem 1000 is automatically controlled by an AOSS, or manually controlled in the event of, for example, power failure, actuator failure, and/or motor system failure. Index ring 1009 is mechanically coupled to adjusting cam 1004. Automatic/manual selection knob 1008 is mechanically coupled via locking pins to spring-loaded ratchet 1010 and eccentric cam gear 1003 as shown in either
The position of adjusting cam 1004 can be detected by a sensor 1011 in a well-known manner and a signal corresponding to the detected position can be output for use by an AOSS according to the present inventive concept as feedback sensing and/or display to an operator.
Reticle tube 1304 includes lenses 1311, 1312 and 1313, a pivot surface 1314 and a reticle surface 1315. Pivot surface 1314 is in contact with an inner surface of sighting system body 1302. A vertical-adjustment actuator 1316 and a horizontal-adjustment actuator 1317 are each mechanically coupled to the front, or forward, portion of reticle tube 1304. Vertical-adjustment actuator 1316 moves the front portion of reticle tube 1304 in a vertical direction, and horizontal-adjustment actuator 1317 moves the front portion of reticle tube 1304 in a horizontal direction. As reticle tube 1304 is moved by actuators 1316 and 1317, reticle tube 1304 pivots on pivot surface 1314. The position of objective tube 1303 and/or reticle tube 1304 can be detected by a position sensors (not shown) in a well-known manner and signals corresponding to the detected position can be output for use by the AOSS according to the present inventive concept as feedback sensing and/or displayed to an operator. An alternative exemplary embodiment provides only one adjustment actuator.
Actuator 1501 rotates the output drive shaft in a selected direction in response to signals received from AOSS processor and controller subsystem 202 (
Adjustor assembly 1500 also include a locking/disengaging setscrew 1511 that is inserted into a set screw hole at 1511 for purposes of locking and unlocking the position of adjustor 1508 for initial zeroing of the index ring 1506. Additionally, a position sensor 1513 may be included within adjustor assembly 1500 for detecting the rotational position of adjustor assembly 1500 for feedback sensing and/or display on a display associated with the AOSS.
Adjustor assembly 1600 can also include a locking/disengaging setscrew that is inserted into a set screw hole 1612 for purposes of locking and unlocking the position of index ring 1608 on adjuster nut 1605 for initial zeroing of index ring 1608. Additionally, a position sensor 1611 could be included within adjustor assembly 1600 for detecting the rotational position of adjustor assembly 1600 for feedback sensing and/or display on a display associated with the AOSS.
Exemplary adjustor assembly 1600 shown in
Adjustor assembly 1900 can also include a locking/disengaging setscrew that is inserted into a set screw hole 1911 for purposes of locking and unlocking the position of index ring 1908 on adjuster nut 1904 for initial zeroing of index ring 1908. Additionally, a position sensor 1912 could be included within adjustor assembly 1900 for detecting the rotational position of adjustor assembly 1900 for feedback sensing and/or display on a display associated with the AOSS.
Exemplary adjustor assembly 1900 shown in
Automatic/manual selection device 1800 includes a knob depression 1801, a shaft 1802, circumferential groove 1803, and circumferential groove 1804. Circumferential groove 1803 (
Operation of the exemplary embodiments of an AOSS according to the present inventive concept depicted in
To operate the system, the marksman may determine the target distance using, e.g., handheld optical or laser rangefinders, or through estimation. This information may be input via the manual input device 615, or directly from, e.g., rangefinder sensor. Just before the shot, the shooter depresses a “start” button on the AOSS unit or remote subsystem, for example, manual input device 615, which signals the electronics to take a range distance measurement to the intended target, ambient weather sensor measurements in the vicinity of the AOSS unit, geographic firing direction of the firearm from the magnetic compass, a firing inclination angle measurement, and retrieve projectile performance data from electronic memory to determine the flight characteristics of the projectile at the measured or estimated distance. Upon completion of the determinations, the electronics subsystems send control signals for adjusting, via the appropriate actuator, the, elevation, windage and lens parallax adjusters for rotary knob embodiments (
When the adjustment sequence is complete, a “green” light emitting diode (LED), or other applicable indicating device, may signal the marksman to initiate the firing sequence. The AOSS may be programmed so that a follow-up shot may be taken within a predetermined period of time programmed into the AOSS prior to the automatic resetting the system. Automatic resetting may be overridden via input device, if desired.
In operation of any of the embodiments described above, the processor system determines precise and accurate aiming adjustments and actuator commands based on the some or all of the following algorithms and measured or estimated parameters: (1) a precise numerical integration of the equations of motion of the projectile, including the three-dimensional wind components (head/tail winds, crosswind, and vertical wind); (2) the ballistic properties of the projectile (e.g., initial velocity, ballistic coefficients or coefficient of drag, transverse and axial moments of inertia, spin rate, etc.); (3) the range distance from the firing point to the target; (4) the inclination angle of fire; (5) the altitude of the firing point; (6) the atmospheric conditions (barometric pressure, air temperature, relative humidity) at the firing point; (7) temperature-dependent variations in muzzle velocity of the firearm; (8) Coriolis accelerations dependent on latitude, longitude, and firing direction at the firing point; and (9) six-degree-of-freedom dependencies of the projectile, including spin drift (also known as Yaw of Repose drift).
As described, one exemplary embodiment of the present inventive concept can utilize machine-executable instructions for determining sighting-system aiming point changes that are necessary for producing a desired projectile point-of-impact. A suitable set of machine-executable instructions that can be utilized for the present inventive concept is similar to the Sierra Infinity Exterior Ballistics Software, which have been produced and copyrighted by the present inventors, and is manufactured by Sierra Bullets, 1400 West Henry Street, Sedalia, Mo. 65301. A description of the machine-executable instructions embodied within an exemplary AOSS according to the present inventive concept is as follows.
The physical laws and necessary mathematics of exterior ballistics are well known and documented in the public domain. See, for example, E. J. McShane et al., “Exterior Ballistics,” University of Denver Press, 1953; and R. L. McCoy, “Modern Exterior Ballistics,” Schiffer Publishing, Ltd., Atglen, Pa., 1999, both of which are incorporated by reference herein. The software coding languages and techniques for processor systems are likewise readily available from microcomputer hardware/software vendors or other sources in the public domain. The application of a processor system solving the equations of motion of a projectile in flight for the purpose of automatic, near-real time aiming of a small arm is a novel invention, and the algorithmic implementations of the physics and mathematics of Exterior Ballistics within an AOSS processor system are novel features of this invention.
The processor system software implementations for actual targets in the field require a pre-operational procedure that is performed by the firearm operator (shooter) before going into the field. This procedure, familiar to shooters, is to sight in the firearm under known conditions at the sight-in firing range location. For an AOSS, this procedure establishes a “home” position for the optical element. The known conditions at the sight-in range are measured range distance from firing point to target, altitude above sea level, ambient atmospheric conditions (absolute barometric pressure, temperature, and relative humidity), wind speed and direction, gravitational acceleration, and inclination angle of the target with respect to local level at the firing point. These conditions may be taken from instruments within the AOSS or from external sources, or in some cases may be determined by the processor system from sensor signals.
The sight-in procedure is not greatly different from operations against a target in the field, except that certain parameters are stored in long term memory within the processor system as “home” values to which the AOSS can return upon command at any time, and also whenever power is turned off to the processor system. That is, when a power turnoff is performed by the firearm operator, the AOSS will return to the “home” position to make ready for a subsequent operation. The sight-in procedure begins with adjusting the parallax correction for the zero range distance to be used. Then, enough rounds are fired in the firearm and sights are adjusted until a group of rounds (typically 3, 5, or 10) impacting the target is centered within or on an aiming spot on the target. The group size may be any number of rounds preferred by the firearm operator or established by custom or policy from authorities. All elevation and windage adjustments are made manually by mechanical means on the optical element. When this accuracy criterion has been satisfied, the processor system determines the following parameters:
α=tan−1(hS/R0)≈hS/R0 (a very small angle)
β=−tan−1(y0−Ydef)/R0)≈−(y0−Ydef)/R0 (a small angle)
Ydef=17.6VVW[1.0−(VXref/Vm)]
Zdef=17.6VCW[1.0−(VXref/Vm)]
Elevation Command=−Ydef/(R0*Kelevation)
Windage Command=−Zdef/(R0*Kwindage)
θref
R
0
y
0
where
During operations in the field, the processor system operates with information stored within its memory, signals received from the sensor complement, and parameters entered by the firearm operator via the keyboard or touchscreen or other devices. The sensors include (referring to
Not all the instruments in this list may be necessary. For example, if wind corrections are left to the judgment of the firearm operator(s), the wind sensors will not be needed. Similarly, Coriolis corrections to the trajectory are generally unnecessary when the maximum effective range of the firearm is less than about 800 meters. In such a case the magnetic compass will not be necessary. Also, if Coriolis corrections are not necessary, latitude and longitude at the firing point are unnecessary, and altitude may be determined with requisite accuracy from the atmospheric conditions at the firing point. In that case the GPS Sensor would not be needed. Furthermore, relative humidity influences on trajectories are small except for extreme weather conditions, and thus the humidity sensor may not be needed. In practice, the instrument list will be tailored to the ammunition, characteristics of the firearm, and the environment in which the firearm is to be utilized. The full sensor complement described above will enable the AOSS to accurately determine and apply aiming corrections to a baseline projectile trajectory for any commercial or military small arm out to its maximum effective range. A reduced complement of sensors may be specifically tailored for the ammunition, firing environment, or limited effective range of the firearm. In either case, full complement or reduced complement, the AOSS will provide accurate aiming corrections for the firearm.
Also, in the event of instrument failure or other happenstance, the firearm operator(s) may input estimates of needed signals into the processor system via the manual input port (keyboard, touchscreen, or other device). Manual entries will override any and all instrument signals at all times.
Information that must be entered by the firearm operator(s) via the manual input port includes:
The English system of physical units (feet, pounds, seconds) is used in calculations in the AOSS processor system. Two reasons for this choice are (1) the parameters characterizing the projectile (mass properties, aerodynamic forces and torques) are available in English units, and (2) these units are most familiar to users educated in the United States.
Initial calculations take place to prepare for the numerical computation of the projectile trajectory. These calculations are started when the firearm operator causes a “Begin” or similarly entitled command to the AOSS processor system via the manual input port or other device.
Referring to
O=k
0
+k
1
I+k
2
I
2 (1)
I=(O−k0)/k1 (2)
If the term k2I2 is not negligible, then the physical input signal to the sensor may be determined from:
I=(k1/2k2){−1+[1+(4k2/k12)(O−k0)]1/2} (3)
For convenience in programming the processor system, alternative forms of Equation (3) may be derived for cases in which k2I2 is small but not negligible by expanding the square-root term in a power series of sufficient length, as will be recognized by a person skilled in mathematics and computer programming.
The computation described above is performed for each sensor shown in
The next initializing calculation is to convert the physical units of all input parameters to a consistent set for trajectory calculations in the English system. Where parameters are provided or needed in the metric system, unit conversions will be made in the processor system where necessary for input data or output commands. Unit conversions will utilize conversion factors available from reference Tables of Conversions in the public domain, or derivable from those references. The numerical precision of the conversion factors is important for numerical accuracy in trajectory computations. In general, a numerical precision of 1 part in 108 in conversion factors is carried within the AOSS processor system. These calculations are familiar to any person skilled in ballistics science.
The next initializing calculation relates to the environment at the firing point location. The first computation is the ratio of air density ρ at the firing point to the air density ρ0 at sea level standard conditions:
(ρ/ρ0)={1.128363/[1+2.175644E−03*TF]}(P/29.52756)[1−0.003783*(RH)*Pwtr (4)
V
wtr=0.04 inch of mercury (5)
V
wtr=0.0377+0.00138TF+0.0000958TF2 inches of mercury (6)
V
wtr=0.2478+0.0081(TF−40)+0.0002825(TF−40)2 inches of Hg (7)
P
wtr=1.0323+0.03004(TF−80)+0.000754(TF−80)2 inches of Hg (8)
Equations (4) through (8) support the computation of the air density ratio. The altitude of the firing location is needed for computation of the gravitational acceleration at the firing location and the ratio of the speed of sound at the firing location to the speed of sound at sea level standard conditions. If the altitude of the firing point is known to the firearm operator (from the GPS receiver, if present, a topographical map, or other source), it will have been entered into the processor system via the manual input port. If altitude is unknown, an approximation can be determined from:
L=−H
S ln(ρ/ρ0) (feet) (9)
H
S=33096.25 feet is the atmosphere scale height; (10)
a=(vS/vS0)=[1.0−1.126666E−05L−6.753074E−11L2]*{(TF+459.67)/(518.67−0.003566L)}1/2 (11)
The computation in this step is the gravitational acceleration at the firing point:
g=32.174[20856258/(20856258+L)]2 (12)
Several parameters must be initialized to begin the trajectory calculation 2104. These include at least the following:
The AOSS processor system determines the projectile's trajectory in X1, Y1, Z1 (slant range) coordinates because trajectory parameters in these coordinates are most useful to the firearm operator. Some parameters, however, are input to the processor system in locally level coordinates, or are needed in locally level coordinates in the computations. The coordinate transformation from level coordinates to slant range coordinates is:
X
1
=X cos θ+Y sin θ
Y
1
=−X sin θ+Y cos θ
Z
1
=Z (13)
The inverse transformation is:
X=X
1 cos θ−Y1 sin θ
Y=X
1 sin θ+Y1 cos θ
Z=Z
1 (14)
The vector differential equations of motion of a projectile in flight are usually written with time of flight as the independent variable. These equations will be familiar to any person skilled in ballistics science. For implementation in the AOSS software, a change of independent variable is made from time of flight to the slant range coordinate X1. This change of variable is exact. No loss of precision or accuracy results, and, in fact, there is some evidence that accuracy is improved by this choice. The ordinary equations of motion are changed using the following:
(d/dt)=vx1(d/dx1)−operator equivalence
dt/dx
1=1/vx1
dy
1
/dx
1
=v
y1
/v
x1
dz
1
/dx
1
=v
z1
/v
x1
d
2
x
1
/dt
2
=v
x1(dvx1/dx1)
d
2
y
1
/dt
2
=v
x1(dvy1/dx1)
d
2
z
1
/dt
2
=v
x1(dvz1/dx1) (15)
This change of variables is believed novel in respect to ballistics software commercially available. It, however, has been used before in military applications where it is known as the China Lake Algorithm, and it has been published in unclassified literature.
Three dynamic models of a slender aerodynamic body in flight have been used. All three models treat the projectile as a rigid body spinning about its longitudinal axis. The simplest model characterizes the projectile as a point mass acted on by aerodynamic drag force and gravitational force. This is a three-degree-of-freedom (3DOF) model treating only the three linear degrees of freedom of the projectile. The most complex dynamic model differs from the 3DOF model in that it treats both the three linear and three rotational degrees of freedom and is known as the six-degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) model. This model is extremely complex and difficult to use. The third model is a modified characterization of the spinning projectile assuming that it is dynamically stable and treating only the strongest displacement effect of angular rotations. This is the so-called spin drift (also known as Yaw of Repose drift). This model also explains some second-order small deflections due to winds that are observed at long ranges. First-order wind deflections are treated in all three models, and all of the models can have Coriolis accelerations included in the equations of motion.
Numerical integration of the equations of motion is performed in the processor system. As is well known to those skilled in mathematics, numerical integration is an iterative process beginning with the initial conditions on all variables and ending when a final condition is reached. For the AOSS, the final condition is reaching the slant range distance of the target. A terminal value of any other integration variable or any combination of terminal values of integration variables required for the application of the firearm may, however, be used. Any one or more of several numerical integration techniques may be used to integrate the equations of motion. These include Taylor series expansions, Runge-Kutta of 2nd or higher order, and several predictor-corrector techniques well known to mathematicians. Because some trajectory variables change smoothly and slowly with distance while others change sharply and rapidly, different integration techniques may be used for different equations of motion. And, in fact, closed form solutions may exist for certain integration variables. Examples are the deflections caused by crosswind and vertical wind in the 3DOF model.
The 3DOF model assumes that the projectile is ideally stabilized during flight. When the model is augmented to include Coriolis accelerations, the resulting trajectories are computationally accurate to range distances of at least 1000 yards. Two versions of the 3DOF model are used. The first version is taken from classical ballistics theory (Reference 1) and makes use of a drag function and a ballistic coefficient to determine the aerodynamic drag force on a projectile. This version is used in commercial applications because ballistic coefficients measured for the G1 drag function are routinely available for commercial bullets and loaded ammunition. The second version has been used for military projectiles since shortly after the end of World War II. Aerodynamic drag on each projectile is measured and then characterized by a coefficient of drag (for the 3DOF model, more coefficients for the 6DOF model). The coefficient of drag is available from military sources only for projectiles used in military small arms, and a very limited number of commercial bullets used by the military and law enforcement organizations. In the slant range X1, Y1, Z1 coordinate system the equations of motion of these models are:
v
x1(dvx1/dx1)=−E*(vx1−vWx1)−g sin θ
v
x1(dvy1/dx1)=−E*(vy1−vWy1)−g cos θ
v
x1(dvz1/dx1)=−E*(vz1−vWz1)
dt/dx
1=1/vx1
dy
1
/dx
1
=v
y1
/v
x1
dz
1
/dx
1
=v
z1
/v
x1 (16)
E=[(ρ/ρ0)*a*G1(vr/a)]/C (17)
Equation Set (16) is numerically integrated in the processor system to yield the two projectile position components y1 and z1, three projectile velocity components vx1, vy1, and vz1, and time of flight t as functions of x1, which is the range distance of the projectile from the firearm along the operator's line of sight.
The ballistic coefficient C varies with the speed of the projectile. For typical bullets C varies slowly with speed above about 1600 feet per second, and more rapidly at speeds below that number, especially near the speed of sound (1120.27 feet per second for the Army Standard Metro Atmosphere used for ballistics calculations). In this model C is allowed to change with speed, typically in a stepwise continuous manner.
v
x1(dvx1/dx1)=−kvs*F*(vx1−vwx1)−g sin θ
v
x1(dvy1/dx1)=−kvs*F*(vy1−vwy1)−g cos θ
v
x1(dvz1/dx1)=−kvs*F*(vz1−vwz1)
dt/dx
1=1/v1
dy
1
/dx
1
=v
y1
/v
x1
dz
1
/dx
1
=v
z1
/v
x1 (18)
Equation Set (18) is numerically integrated in the processor system to yield the two projectile position components y1 and z1, three projectile velocity components vx1, vy1, and vz1, and time of flight t as functions of x1, which is the range distance of the projectile from the firearm along the operator's line of sight.
The drag coefficient CD is measured for each type of projectile (but with more difficulty than the ballistic coefficient), and it varies strongly with the speed of the projectile especially near the speed of sound. After CD has been measured, a functional representation of its behavior in different speed regions is obtained by fitting suitably chosen mathematical functions to the measured data. These functions are used in the numerical integration.
Coriolis accelerations cause deflections to the 3DOF trajectory determined from Equation Sets (16) or (18) which become significant (deflections on the order of an inch or more) at range distances greater than about 800 yards or meters for typical sporting and military rifle cartridges. To account for Coriolis deflections to the trajectory, the following three acceleration terms are added algebraically to the first three equations of each Equation Set (16) or (18):
a
CorX1=2ΩE[−vy1 cos Lat sin Az+vz1(cos Lat cos Az sin θ−sin Lat cos θ)]
a
CorY1=2ΩE[vx1 cos Lat sin Az+vz1(cos Lat cos Az cos θ+sin Lat sin θ)]
a
CorZ1=2ΩE[vx1(sin Lat cos θ−cos Lat cos Az sin θ)−vy1(cos Lat cos Az cos θ+sin Lat sin θ)] (19)
where
The azimuth angle of fire Az is measured by a magnetic compass. Azimuth angle is referenced to true geodetic north, while a magnetic compass indicates the direction of the local magnetic north as viewed at the firing site. The angular difference between geodetic north and magnetic north is defined as the magnetic declination. It is known that the magnetic declination at any fixed location on earth changes with time. Changes of a degree or two can occur over periods as small as five years. It is also known that magnetic declination varies with location on the earth, and this variation can be large. Geomagnetic maps of the earth are available (e.g., from the National Geophysical Data Center), and for nearly all regions of the earth including ocean areas, these maps show the magnetic declination at latitude and longitude coordinates. The approach used in the processor system is to (1) obtain a geomagnetic map of the area on the earth where the firearm is to be used, (2) construct a grid in latitude and longitude coordinates listing the magnetic declinations at each point on the grid, a (3) fit a polynomial(s) in latitude and longitude to the magnetic declinations. Enter the polynomial(s) into the processor system via the manual input port for long term storage. Then, for firearm operation at any position within the gridmap, the magnetic declination can be determined when needed for the Coriolis corrections. In some cases an average magnetic declination may serve for a sizable operational area. In such a case, the firearm operator can enter that average magnetic declination into the processor system, obviating the necessity of the polynomial(s). This approach must be used when latitude and longitude data are not available, e.g., when a GPS receiver is not available. With the magnetic declination known, the azimuth angle is obtained by algebraically adding the declination to the magnetic bearing of the target obtained from the magnetic compass.
The bullet path is defined as the perpendicular distance from the line of sight of the AOSS to the bullet location in the vertical X1-Y1 plane. The bullet path is therefore the position of the bullet projected into that vertical plane that the firearm operator would “see” as the bullet flies toward the target. This definition applies for all inclination angles of fire.
As explained earlier, a reference trajectory will be calculated when the firearm is initially sighted in by the firearm operator on a convenient firing range before the operational environment is entered. It is advantageous to determine a bullet path for that reference trajectory, mainly for observation by the firearm operator(s).
The reference bullet path at any range distance R on the reference trajectory 2105 is determined from:
BP(R)=R*[(hs−y0)/R0]−D(R)cos(θref+β)*{1+[(hs−y0)/R0]*tan(θref+β)} (20)
where
D(R)=[−y(R)sec(θref+β)]/{1−[vY(R)/vX(Rr)]*tan(θref+β)} (21)
On the actual trajectory the projectile has coordinates x1, y1, z1, and the x1-axis is inclined at a measured angle θ with respect to the local level. The angle β is unchanged from the reference trajectory value defined in the preceeding Section 3.3.1.4.1. The bullet path on the actual trajectory 2106 is determined from:
BP(x1)=x1*[(hs−y0)/R0]−D(x1)cos(θ+β)*{1+[(hs−y0)/R0]*tan(θ+β)}−hs (22)
D(x1)=[−y1(x1)sec(θ+β)]/{1−[vY1(x1)/vX1(x1)]*tan(θ+β)} (23)
This bullet path computation is made wherever needed on the actual trajectory. It is especially needed at the endpoint of the trajectory, where the bullet path becomes the aiming adjustment in the elevation direction with respect to the elevation “home” position.
When the angular motions of a projectile in flight are of interest, the 6DOF model is necessary. The six equations of motion for the 6DOF model are analytically complex, and the integration of these equations is computationally complex. The 6DOF equations and their solutions are described in E. J. McShane et al., “Exterior Ballistics,” University of Denver Press, 1953; and R. L. McCoy, “Modern Exterior Ballistics,” Schiffer Publishing, Ltd., Atglen, Pa., 1999. This model has been used extensively by the military to study projectile motions in flight and for targeting long range, heavy caliber guns, using large computers. It has been found that the full 6DOF model is not necessary for small arms which have more limited effective ranges. Thus, the full 6DOF model has not been implemented for application in the AOSS processor system.
Studies of projectile angular motions during flight have shown some “average” or “steady” yaw and pitch angles, resulting from gyroscopic stabilization of the projectile, which either cause or respond to small aerodynamic forces and moments of torque applied to the projectile. The largest of these effects for a well stabilized projectile is the Yaw of Repose, which causes a vertical moment of torque, which in turn causes the projectile to nose downward as it flies so that the longitudinal axis remains almost exactly tangent to the trajectory path. An associated small aerodynamic force acts in the horizontal plane to cause the projectile to deflect horizontally. This is known as Yaw of Repose drift or “spin” drift. An approximate equation for this horizontal deflection has been derived from the 6DOF model and is used to augment the 3DOF model, as explained in the next Section. The Yaw of Repose deflection at 1000 yards for a typical military bullet is a few inches and grows with increased range distance. This must be compensated for long range accuracy.
The next most important effect concerns deflections caused by winds. It is well known that a crosswind will cause a horizontal crossrange deflection of a projectile in a direction to follow the wind. This deflection is first-order small compared to the range distance, but appreciable compared to the extent of the target. This deflection is included in the 3DOF model if the wind speed and direction are known within the processor system. Less well known is the observation that a crosswind also will cause a second-order small vertical deflection of the projectile. This vertical deflection is typically about 10 percent of the crossrange deflection. Similarly, a vertical wind will cause, principally, a vertical deflection of the projectile, and also a smaller horizontal deflection. The 6DOF model explains why these smaller deflections orthogonal to the wind directions occur, but they are not included in the 3DOF model for practical reasons concerned with wind velocity estimations over long ranges of fire.
As small arms improve in range and accuracy and as processor systems improve in speed and memory capacity, it may happen that the full 6DOF model may be implemented for future AOSS applications.
The modified 3DOF model of projectile flight implemented in the AOSS processor system consists of the basic 3DOF model of Section 3.3.1 augmented with the Coriolis accelerations of Section 3.3.1.3 and the acceleration caused by the Yaw of Repose. The acceleration caused by the Yaw of Repose is only in the Z1 direction and is given by:
a
Z1spin=[(8Ilongpg)/(πρ0d3vr2CMα)]*[aG1(vr/a)/C] (24)
for the classical 3DOF model and
a
Z1spin=(CDIlongpg)/(MdvrCMα) (25)
for the modern 3DOF model.
In Equations (24) and (25)
Measurements of CMα have been made for projectiles used by the military. For sporting bullets approximations are used:
These approximations are considered “typical” but may lack accuracy for sporting purposes at very long range distances.
Listed below are the modified 3DOF equations of motion implemented in the AOSS processor system for either the classical or the modern approach:
v
x1(dvx1/dx1)=−E*(vx1−vWx1)−g sin θ+aCorX1
v
x1(dvy1/dx1)=−E*(vy1−vWy1)−g cos θ+aCorY1
v
x1(dvz1/dx1)=−E*(vz1−vWz1)+aCorZ1+aZ1spin
dt/dx
1=1/vx1
dy
1
/dx
1
=v
y1
/v
x1
dz
1
/dx
1
=v
z1
/v
x1
E=[(ρ/ρ0)*a*G1(vr/a)]/C (Classical Model) (26)
v
x1(dvx1/dx1)=−kvs*F*(vx1−vwx1)−g sin θ+aCorX1
v
x1(dvy1/dx1)=−kvs*F*(vy1−vwy1)−g cos θ+aCorY1
v
x1(dvz1/dx1)=−kvs*F*(vz1−vwz1)+aCorZ1+aZ1spin
t/dx
1=1/vx1
dy
1
/dx
1
=v
y1
/v
x1
dz
1
/dx
1
=v
z1
/v
x1
F=(½ρSCDvr)/M (Modern Model)(27)
All terms and parameters in Equation Sets (26) and (27) are as previously defined. When the classical or modern model is chosen, either Equation Set (26) or (27) is implemented in the processor system. The chosen set is numerically integrated from the firing point to the target located on the X1-axis. It has been found that a constant integration step size Δx1 equal to 1 yard or 1 meter provides adequate speed and excellent numerical accuracy. This step size is convenient because the range distances to the target are known with a precision of a yard or meter. A number of accuracy tests, however, have been applied by mathematicians to increase the speed of the numerical computations by lengthening the integration step, and one or more of these mathematical policies can be used in the processor system.
At the endpoint of each integration step, several calculations take place.
x
1new
=x
1previous
+Δx
1 (independent variable update)
Y
1new
=y
1previous
+Δy
1 (determined by the integration equations)
z
1new
=z
1previous
+Δz
1
a (determined by the integration equations)
t
new
=t
previous
+Δt (determined by the integration equations)
v
X1new
=v
X1previous
+ΔV
X1 (determined by the integration equations)
V
Y1new
=V
Y1previous
+Δv
Y1 (determined by the integration equations)
v
Z1new
=v
Z1previous
+Δv
Z1 (determined by the integration equations)
The updated x1 variable is tested against the range distance to the target:
x
1new
=R
target
If the answer to this question is yes, trajectory integration is stopped. If the answer is no, the trajectory integration continues.
(ρ/ρ0)=(ρ/ρ0)FP*e−h/Hs
a=(vS/vS0)=[1.0−1.126666E−05(L+h)−6.753074E−11(L+h)2]*{(TF+459.67)/[518.67.−0.003566(L+h)]}1/2
g=32.174[20856258/(20856258+L+h)]2
h=x
1new sin θ+y1new cos θ
TF is the ambient temperature at the firing point;
HS=33096.25 feet is the scale height of the atmosphere
When the integration endpoint of the actual trajectory is reached, the processor system has calculated the final values y1final and z1fina1 at the target location x1fina1=Rtarget. A final bullet path value BP(Rtarget) is calculated from Equation (22) with x1=x1final=Rtarget.
The aiming adjustments for the optical sight in elevation and windage directions are then determined:
Elevation Adjustment=BP(Rtarget)
Windage Adjustment=z1final
These adjustments are with respect to the “home” position of the optical assembly. A positive value of BP means that the projectile impact point at the target must be lowered; a negative value means that it must be raised. A positive value of z1fina1 means that the projectile impact point at the target must be moved to the shooter's left; a negative value means that the impact point must be moved to the shooter's right.
The final processor system function, which follows completion of the aiming adjustment determinations, is the determination of adjustment commands for the elevation 2107, windage 2108, and parallax 2109 actuators, as shown in
Elevation Command={[BP(Rtarget)/Rtarget}Kelevation
Windage Command=(z1final/Rtarget)/Kwindage
Parallax Command=(Rtarget−R0)/Kparallax
where
These commands are in units of positive or negative pulse counts or analog signal units and are directly issued to the actuator driver subassemblies.
When confirmation is received by the processor system that the commands have been executed, a signal will be displayed within view by the operator to alert that person to initiate the firing sequence of the firearm.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced that are within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
The present patent application is a Continuation patent application of application Ser. No. 12/807,118, filed Aug. 27, 2010, entitled “Optical Sighting System,” and invented by Bernard T. Windauer et al., which is a Continuation patent application of Ser. No. 11/720,426, filed May 29, 2007, entitled “Optical Sighting System,” and invented by Bernard T. Windauer et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 7,806,331 B2 to Windauer et al., and the present patent application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/632,331, filed Nov. 30, 2004, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/638,561, filed Dec. 22, 2004, and PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US05/43335, filed Nov. 30, 2005, the contents of each being hereby incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60638561 | Dec 2004 | US | |
| 60632331 | Nov 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12807118 | Aug 2010 | US |
| Child | 13225946 | US | |
| Parent | 11720426 | May 2007 | US |
| Child | 12807118 | US |
