Patent Grant
11874576
This disclosure generally relates to optical stacks for use in privacy display and low stray light displays.
Privacy displays provide image visibility to a primary user that is typically in an on-axis position and reduced visibility of image content to a snooper, that is typically in an off-axis position. A privacy function may be provided by micro-louvre optical films that transmit a high luminance from a display in an on-axis direction with low luminance in off-axis positions, however such films are not switchable, and thus the display is limited to privacy only function.
Switchable privacy displays may be provided by control of the off-axis optical output.
Control of off-axis privacy may be provided by means of contrast reduction, for example by adjusting the liquid crystal bias tilt in an In-Plane-Switching LCD.
Control may be further provided by means of off-axis luminance reduction. Luminance reduction may be achieved by means of switchable backlights for a liquid crystal display (LCD) spatial light modulator. Off-axis luminance reduction may also be provided by switchable liquid crystal retarders and compensation retarders arranged to modulate the input and/or output directional luminance profile of a spatial light modulator.
Control may be further provided by means of off-axis reflectivity increase. Reflectivity increase may be achieved by means of switchable liquid crystal retarders, and compensation retarders that are arranged to control the polarisation of ambient light that falls onto a reflective polariser.
According to a first aspect of the present disclosure there is provided a display device comprising: a spatial light modulator; a display polariser arranged on the output side of the spatial light modulator, the display polariser being a linear polariser; an additional polariser arranged on the output side of display polariser, the additional polariser being a linear polariser; and plural polar control retarders arranged between the additional polariser and the display polariser, wherein an air gap divides the plural polar control retarders into at least one air gap input retarder between the display polariser and the air gap and at least one air gap output retarder between the air gap and the additional polariser, the at least one air gap input retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser into circularly polarised light, and the plural polar control retarders together being capable of simultaneously introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders and introducing a net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders.
Advantageously a privacy display may be provided to achieve high luminance to an on-axis user and low luminance to an off-axis snooper, achieving high visual security level. An air gap is arranged to achieve reduced assembly cost and improve manufacturing yield. Multiple spatial light modulators may be arranged with a single retardation stack and additional polariser. Image contrast may be optimised for the head-on user.
The plural polar control retarders may include at least one passive retarder. The cost of the display may be reduced. The polar angular range over which high visual security level is achieved may be increased in comparison to displays without passive retarders.
The at least one passive retarder may comprise two passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed. The pair of passive retarders may have optical axes that extend at 45° and at 135°, respectively, with respect to an electric vector transmission direction that is parallel to the electric vector transmission of the display polariser. Advantageously in-plane retarders may be used that have lower cost than out of plane retarders.
The two passive retarders may be both included in one of the at least one air gap output retarder or the at least one air gap input retarder. The two passive retarders may introduce no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders, and the at least one passive compensation retarder may comprise a further two passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the further two passive retarders being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder and the at least one air gap input retarder, the further two passive retarders introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders, and the one of the further two passive retarders which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser into circularly polarised light. Advantageously the number of passive retarders may be reduced, reducing display cost and complexity.
The two passive retarders may introduce a net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders, and the at least one passive compensation retarder may comprise a further passive retarder included in the other of the at least one air gap output retarder or the at least one air gap input retarder, the further passive retarder introducing a relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders that is equal and opposite to said net, relative phase shift introduced by the at least one passive compensation retarder.
Said one of the two passive retarders and the further passive retarder may have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, and the other of the two passive retarders has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm that is equal to the retardance of said one of the two passive retarders minus the retardance of the further passive retarder. Said one of the two passive retarders and the further passive retarder may have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are aligned, and the other of the two passive retarders may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm that is equal to the retardance of said one of the two passive retarders plus the retardance of the further passive retarder. Advantageously the chromaticity of the reflection reduction at the air interfaces may be reduced.
The plural polar control retarders may include a switchable liquid crystal retarder comprising a layer of liquid crystal material, the switchable liquid crystal retarder being provided between the pair of passive retarders. The display device may further comprise a transparent electrode and a liquid crystal alignment layer formed on a side of each of the pair of passive retarders adjacent the switchable liquid crystal retarder. The display device may further comprise first and second substrates between which the switchable liquid crystal retarder is provided, the first and second substrates each comprising one of the pair of passive retarders. Advantageously the display may be switched between a public viewing mode with wide angle image visibility and a privacy mode with high visual security level for off-axis viewing.
The two passive retarders may be respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder and the at least one air gap input retarder. Advantageously the number of retarders may be reduced, reducing cost and complexity.
The at least one passive compensation retarder may comprise a passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder. The passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −400 nm to −1000 nm or in a range from +500 nm to +1200 nm and preferably in a range from −750 nm to −850 nm or preferably in a range from +950 nm to +1050 nm. Advantageously the display thickness may be reduced. Advantageously the off-axis visual security level may be increased.
The plural polar control retarders may further comprise two passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the two passive retarders being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder and the at least one air gap input retarder, the two passive retarders introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders, and the one of the two passive retarders which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser into circularly polarised light. The retardance of the at least one passive compensation retarder may be equal and opposite to the retardance of the switchable liquid crystal retarder. Advantageously a public mode with wide field of view and high image visibility to off-axis users may be achieved.
The plural polar control retarders may include a switchable liquid crystal retarder comprising a layer of liquid crystal material. The switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer of liquid crystal material and on opposite sides thereof, each of the surface alignment layers being arranged to provide homeotropic alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material. The layer of liquid crystal material of the switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise a liquid crystal material with a negative dielectric anisotropy. The layer of liquid crystal material may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 900 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 850 nm. The plural polar control retarders may further include: a passive retarder which has an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the passive retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −900 nm, preferably in a range from −450 nm to −800 nm and most preferably in a range from −500 nm to −725 nm; or a pair of passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each retarder of the pair of passive retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 500 nm to 700 nm and most preferably in a range from 550 nm to 675 nm. Advantageously the public mode may be provided with low power consumption. Advantageously the passive retarders may be provided to match the liquid crystal mode.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer of liquid crystal material and on opposite sides thereof, each of the surface alignment layers being arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material. The layer of liquid crystal material of the switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise a liquid crystal material with a positive dielectric anisotropy. The layer of liquid crystal material may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 850 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 800 nm. The plural polar control retarders may further include: a passive retarder which has an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −700 nm, preferably in a range from −350 nm to −600 nm and most preferably in a range from −400 nm to −500 nm; or a pair of passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each retarder of the pair of passive retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 350 nm to 650 nm and most preferably in a range from 450 nm to 550 nm. Advantageously the display may have increased resilience to applied mechanical stress.
Each alignment layer may have a pretilt having a pretilt direction with a component in the plane of the liquid crystal layer that is parallel or anti-parallel or orthogonal to the electric vector transmission direction of the display polariser. The switchable liquid crystal retarder may further comprise electrodes arranged to apply a voltage for controlling the layer of liquid crystal material. The electrodes may be on opposite sides of the layer of liquid crystal material. The display polariser and the additional polariser may have electric vector transmission directions that are parallel. Advantageously the display may be controlled to switch between privacy and public modes with high efficiency.
The display polariser and the additional polariser may have electric vector transmission directions that are not parallel, and the display device may further comprise a rotator retarder arranged between the additional polariser and the display polariser, the rotator retarder being arranged to rotate a polarisation direction of polarised light incident thereon between the electric vector transmission directions of the display polariser and the additional polariser. The spatial light modulator may include a layer of twisted nematic liquid crystal material.
A reflective polariser is arranged between the display polariser and additional polariser, the reflective polariser being a linear polariser. The display polariser and the reflective polariser may have electric vector transmission directions that are parallel. Advantageously off-axis visual security level of the display may be increased for reduced ambient light levels in comparison to displays without the reflective polariser.
A diffusing surface structure may be provided on at least one of the at least one air gap input retarder and at least one air gap output retarder. Advantageously specular reflections at interfaces may be reduced.
The display device may further comprise at least one further retarder and a further additional polariser, wherein the at least one further retarder is arranged between the first-mentioned additional polariser and the further additional polariser. Advantageously the off-axis luminance may be further reduced in privacy mode in comparison to displays comprising a single additional polariser. Desirable visual security levels may be achieved using wide angle luminance output profiles from the spatial light modulator. Wide angle backlights may be used that may be manufactured with higher yields in comparison to collimated backlights. Emissive displays may be provided with switchable privacy functionality while achieving high visual security levels.
The display device may further comprise a backlight arranged to output light, wherein the spatial light modulator is a transmissive spatial light modulator arranged to receive output light from the backlight. The backlight may provide a luminance at polar angles to the normal to the spatial light modulator greater than 45 degrees that is at most 33% of the luminance along the normal to the spatial light modulator, preferably at most 20% of the luminance along the normal to the spatial light modulator, and most preferably at most 10% of the luminance along the normal to the spatial light modulator. Advantageously a further additional polariser may not be provided in order to achieve desirable visual security levels for off-axis snoopers. Display thickness, complexity and cost may be reduced.
The backlight may comprise: an array of light sources; a directional waveguide comprising: an input end extending in a lateral direction along a side of the directional waveguide, the light sources being disposed along the input end and arranged to input input light into the waveguide; and opposed first and second guide surfaces extending across the directional waveguide from the input end for guiding light input at the input end along the waveguide, the waveguide being arranged to deflect input light guided through the directional waveguide to exit through the first guide surface. The backlight may further comprise a light turning film and the directional waveguide is a collimating waveguide. The collimating waveguide may comprise: (i) a plurality of elongate lenticular elements; and (ii) a plurality of inclined light extraction features, wherein the plurality of elongate lenticular elements and the plurality of inclined light extraction features are oriented to deflect input light guided through the directional waveguide to exit through the first guide surface. The directional waveguide may be an imaging waveguide arranged to image the light sources in the lateral direction so that the output light from the light sources is directed into respective optical windows in output directions that are distributed in dependence on the input positions of the light sources. The imaging waveguide may comprise a reflective end for reflecting the input light back along the imaging waveguide, wherein the second guide surface is arranged to deflect the reflected input light through the first guide surface as output light, the second guide surface comprises light extraction features and intermediate regions between the light extraction features, the light extraction features being oriented to deflect the reflected input light through the first guide surface as output light and the intermediate regions being arranged to direct light through the waveguide without extracting it; and the reflective end has positive optical power in the lateral direction extending between sides of the waveguide that extend between the first and second guide surfaces. The display device may further comprise an input polariser arranged on the input side of the spatial light modulator. Advantageously low cost collimating backlights with low thickness may be provided.
The display device may further comprise a further additional polariser arranged on the input side of the spatial light modulator and at least one further retarder arranged between the at least one further additional polariser and the input polariser. Advantageously the thickness added to the front of the display may be reduced. No air gap input and output retarders may be provided for the at least one further retarder. The complexity of the retarder stack may be reduced, reducing thickness and cost.
The spatial light modulator may comprise an emissive spatial light modulator. Advantageously device thickness may be reduced.
According to a second aspect of the present disclosure there may be provided a view angle control optical element for application to a display device comprising a spatial light modulator and a display polariser arranged on the output side of the spatial light modulator, the view angle control optical element comprising a control polariser, being a linear polariser, and plural polar control retarders for arrangement between the control polariser and the display polariser on application of the view angle control optical element to the display device, wherein an air gap divides the plural polar control retarders into at least one air gap input retarder and at least one air gap output retarder, the at least one air gap input retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser into circularly polarised light, and the plural polar control retarders together being capable of simultaneously introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders and introducing a net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders. A view angle control optical element may be provided that may be arranged with a spatial light modulator to achieve a switchable privacy display without bonding to advantageously reduce cost. A display comprising the view angle control element and an air gap can advantageously achieve high image contrast. The component can be added to curved displays with a different curvature to the spatial light modulator. Advantageously luminance uniformity may be increased.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of optical systems. The embodiment may include or work with a variety of projectors, projection systems, optical components, displays, microdisplays, computer systems, processors, self-contained projector systems, visual and/or audio-visual systems and electrical and/or optical devices. Aspects of the present disclosure may be used with practically any apparatus related to optical and electrical devices, optical systems, presentation systems or any apparatus that may contain any type of optical system. Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure may be employed in optical systems, devices used in visual and/or optical presentations, visual peripherals and so on and in a number of computing environments.
Before proceeding to the disclosed embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application or creation to the details of the particular arrangements shown, because the disclosure is capable of other embodiments. Moreover, aspects of the disclosure may be set forth in different combinations and arrangements to define embodiments unique in their own right. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
Directional backlights offer control over the illumination emanating from substantially the entire output surface controlled typically through modulation of independent LED light sources arranged at the input aperture side of an optical waveguide. Controlling the emitted light directional distribution can achieve single person viewing for a security function, where the display can only be seen by a single viewer from a limited range of angles; high electrical efficiency, where illumination is primarily provided over a small angular directional distribution; alternating left and right eye viewing for time sequential stereoscopic and autostereoscopic display; and low cost.
These and other advantages and features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this disclosure in its entirety.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example in the accompanying FIGURES, in which like reference numbers indicate similar parts, and in which:
Terms related to optical retarders for the purposes of the present disclosure will now be described.
In a layer comprising a uniaxial birefringent material there is a direction governing the optical anisotropy whereas all directions perpendicular to it (or at a given angle to it) have equivalent birefringence.
The optical axis of an optical retarder refers to the direction of propagation of a light ray in the uniaxial birefringent material in which no birefringence is experienced. This is different from the optical axis of an optical system which may for example be parallel to a line of symmetry or normal to a display surface along which a principal ray propagates.
For light propagating in a direction orthogonal to the optical axis, the optical axis is the slow axis when linearly polarized light with an electric vector direction parallel to the slow axis travels at the slowest speed. The slow axis direction is the direction with the highest refractive index at the design wavelength. Similarly the fast axis direction is the direction with the lowest refractive index at the design wavelength.
For positive dielectric anisotropy uniaxial birefringent materials the slow axis direction is the extraordinary axis of the birefringent material. For negative dielectric anisotropy uniaxial birefringent materials the fast axis direction is the extraordinary axis of the birefringent material.
The terms half a wavelength and quarter a wavelength refer to the operation of a retarder for a design wavelength λ0 that may typically be between 500 nm and 570 nm. In the present illustrative embodiments exemplary retardance values are provided for a wavelength of 550 nm unless otherwise specified.
The retarder provides a relative phase shift between two orthogonal polarization components of the light wave incident thereon and is characterized by the amount of relative phase, F, that it imparts on the two polarization components. In some contexts, the term “phase shift” is used without the word “relative” but still meaning relative phase shift. The relative phase shift is related to the birefringence Δn and the thickness d of the retarder by:
Γ=2·π·Δn·d/λ0 eqn. 1
In eqn. 1, Δn is defined as the difference between the extraordinary and the ordinary index of refraction, i.e.
Δn=ne−no eqn. 2
For a half-wave retarder, the relationship between d, Δn, and λ0 is chosen so that the phase shift between polarization components is Γ=π. For a quarter-wave retarder, the relationship between d, Δn, and λ0 is chosen so that the phase shift between polarization components is Γ=π/2.
The term half-wave retarder herein typically refers to light propagating normal to the retarder and normal to the spatial light modulator (SLM).
Some aspects of the propagation of light rays through a transparent retarder between a pair of polarisers will now be described.
The state of polarisation (SOP) of a light ray is described by the relative amplitude and phase shift between any two orthogonal polarization components. Transparent retarders do not alter the relative amplitudes of these orthogonal polarisation components but act only on their relative phase. Providing a net phase shift between the orthogonal polarisation components alters the SOP whereas maintaining net relative phase preserves the SOP.
A linear SOP has a polarisation component with a non-zero amplitude and an orthogonal polarisation component which has zero amplitude.
A linear polariser transmits a unique linear SOP that has a linear polarisation component parallel to the electric vector transmission direction of the linear polariser and attenuates light with a different SOP.
Absorbing polarisers are polarisers that absorb one polarisation component of incident light and transmit a second orthogonal polarisation component. Examples of absorbing linear polarisers are dichroic polarisers.
Reflective polarisers are polarisers that reflect one polarisation component of incident light and transmit a second orthogonal polarisation component. Examples of reflective polarisers that are linear polarisers are multilayer polymeric film stacks such as DBEF™ or APF™ from 3M Corporation, or wire grid polarisers such as ProFlux™ from Moxtek. Reflective linear polarisers may further comprise cholesteric reflective materials and a quarter waveplate arranged in series.
A retarder arranged between a linear polariser and a parallel linear analysing polariser that introduces no relative net phase shift provides full transmission of the light other than residual absorption within the linear polariser.
A retarder that provides a relative net phase shift between orthogonal polarisation components changes the SOP and provides attenuation at the analysing polariser.
In the present disclosure an ‘A-plate’ refers to an optical retarder utilizing a layer of birefringent material with its optical axis parallel to the plane of the layer.
A ‘positive A-plate’ refers to positively birefringent A-plates, i.e. A-plates with a positive Δn.
In the present disclosure a ‘C-plate’ refers to an optical retarder utilizing a layer of birefringent material with its optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the layer. A ‘positive C-plate’ refers to positively birefringent C-plate, i.e. a C-plate with a positive Δn. A ‘negative C-plate’ refers to a negatively birefringent C-plate, i.e. a C-plate with a negative Δn.
‘O-plate’ refers to an optical retarder utilizing a layer of birefringent material with its optical axis having a component parallel to the plane of the layer and a component perpendicular to the plane of the layer. A ‘positive O-plate’ refers to positively birefringent O-plates, i.e. O-plates with a positive Δn.
Achromatic retarders may be provided wherein the material of the retarder is provided with a retardance Δn·d that varies with wavelength λ as
Δn·d/λ=κ eqn. 3
where κ is substantially a constant.
Examples of suitable materials include modified polycarbonates from Teijin Films. Achromatic retarders may be provided in the present embodiments to advantageously minimise color changes between polar angular viewing directions which have low luminance reduction and polar angular viewing directions which have increased luminance reductions as will be described below.
Various other terms used in the present disclosure related to retarders and to liquid crystals will now be described.
A liquid crystal cell has a retardance given by Δn·d where Δn is the birefringence of the liquid crystal material in the liquid crystal cell and d is the thickness of the liquid crystal cell, independent of the alignment of the liquid crystal material in the liquid crystal cell.
Homogeneous alignment refers to the alignment of liquid crystals in switchable LCDs where molecules align substantially parallel to a substrate. Homogeneous alignment is sometimes referred to as planar alignment. Homogeneous alignment may typically be provided with a small pre-tilt such as 2 degrees, so that the molecules at the surfaces of the alignment layers of the liquid crystal cell are slightly inclined as will be described below. Pretilt is arranged to minimise degeneracies in switching of cells.
In the present disclosure, homeotropic alignment is the state in which rod-like liquid crystalline molecules align substantially perpendicularly to the substrate. In discotic liquid crystals homeotropic alignment is defined as the state in which an axis of the column structure, which is formed by disc-like liquid crystalline molecules, aligns perpendicularly to a surface. In homeotropic alignment, pretilt is the tilt angle of the molecules that are close to the alignment layer and is typically close to 90 degrees and for example may be 88 degrees.
In a twisted liquid crystal layer a twisted configuration (also known as a helical structure or helix) of nematic liquid crystal molecules is provided. The twist may be achieved by means of a non-parallel alignment of alignment layers. Further, cholesteric dopants may be added to the liquid crystal material to break degeneracy of the twist direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise) and to further control the pitch of the twist in the relaxed (typically undriven) state. A supertwisted liquid crystal layer has a twist of greater than 180 degrees. A twisted nematic layer used in SLMs typically has a twist of 90 degrees.
Liquid crystal molecules with positive dielectric anisotropy are switched from a homogeneous alignment (such as an A-plate retarder orientation) to a homeotropic alignment (such as a C-plate or O-plate retarder orientation) by means of an applied electric field.
Liquid crystal molecules with negative dielectric anisotropy are switched from a homeotropic alignment (such as a C-plate or O-plate retarder orientation) to a homogeneous alignment (such as an A-plate retarder orientation) by means of an applied electric field.
Rod-like molecules have a positive birefringence so that ne>no as described in equation 2. Discotic molecules have negative birefringence so that ne<no.
Positive retarders such as A-plates, positive O-plates and positive C-plates may typically be provided by stretched films or rod-like liquid crystal molecules. Negative retarders such as negative C-plates may be provided by stretched films or discotic like liquid crystal molecules.
Parallel liquid crystal cell alignment refers to the alignment direction of homogeneous alignment layers being parallel or more typically antiparallel. In the case of pre-tilted homeotropic alignment, the alignment layers may have components that are substantially parallel or antiparallel. Hybrid aligned liquid crystal cells may have one homogeneous alignment layer and one homeotropic alignment layer. Twisted liquid crystal cells may be provided by alignment layers that do not have parallel alignment, for example oriented at 90 degrees to each other.
Transmissive SLMs may further comprise retarders between the input display polariser and the output display polariser for example as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,237,876, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such retarders (not shown) are in a different place to the passive retarders of the present embodiments. Such retarders compensate for contrast degradations for off-axis viewing locations, which is a different effect to the luminance reduction for off-axis viewing positions of the present embodiments.
A private mode of operation of a display is one in which an observer sees a low contrast sensitivity such that an image is not clearly visible. Contrast sensitivity is a measure of the ability to discern between luminances of different levels in a static image. Inverse contrast sensitivity may be used as a measure of visual security, in that a high visual security level (VSL) corresponds to low image visibility.
For a privacy display providing an image to an observer, visual security may be given as:
VSL=(Y+R)/(Y−K) eqn. 4
where VSL is the visual security level, Y is the luminance of the white state of the display at a snooper viewing angle, K is the luminance of the black state of the display at the snooper viewing angle and R is the luminance of reflected light from the display.
Panel contrast ratio is given as:
C=Y/K eqn. 5
For high contrast optical LCD modes, the white state transmission remains substantially constant with viewing angle. In the contrast reducing liquid crystal modes of the present embodiments, white state transmission typically reduces as black state transmission increases such that
Y+K˜P·L eqn. 6
The visual security level may then be further given as:
where off-axis relative luminance, P is typically defined as the percentage of head-on luminance, L at the snooper angle and the display may have image contrast ratio C and the surface reflectivity is ρ.
The off-axis relative luminance, P is sometimes referred to as the privacy level. However, such privacy level P describes relative luminance of a display at a given polar angle compared to head-on luminance, and is not a measure of privacy appearance.
The display may be illuminated by Lambertian ambient illuminance I. Thus in a perfectly dark environment, a high contrast display has VSL of approximately 1.0. As ambient illuminance increases, the perceived image contrast degrades, VSL increases and a private image is perceived.
For typical liquid crystal displays the panel contrast C is above 100:1 for almost all viewing angles, allowing the visual security level to be approximated to:
VSL=1+I·ρ/(π·P·L) eqn. 8
In comparison to privacy displays, desirably wide angle displays are easily observed in standard ambient illuminance conditions. One measure of image visibility is given by the contrast sensitivity such as the Michelson contrast which is given by:
M=(Imax−Imin)/(Imax+Imin) eqn. 9
and so:
M=((Y+R)−(K+R))/((Y+R)+(K+R))=(Y−K)/(Y+K+2·R) eqn. 10
Thus the visual security level (VSL), is equivalent (but not identical to) 1/M. In the present discussion, for a given off-axis relative luminance, P the wide angle image visibility, W is approximated as
W=1/VSL=1/(1+I·ρ/(π·P·L)) eqn. 11
Switchable directional display apparatuses for use in privacy display for example and comprising plural retarders arranged between a display polariser and an additional polariser are described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,126,575 and in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2019-0086706, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties. Directional display apparatuses further comprising reflective polarisers arranged between the display polariser and retarders are described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,303,030 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/256,120 filed Jan. 24, 2019, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties. Directional display polarisers comprising passive retarders arranged between a display polariser and an additional polariser are described in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2018-0321553, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Also herein incorporated by reference in their entireties are U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/256,754 filed Jan. 24, 2019, U.S. Provisional Patent Appl. No. 62/756,902 filed Nov. 7, 2018, and U.S. Provisional Patent Appl. No. 62/844,980 filed May 8, 2019.
The display device 100 comprises a spatial light modulator 48; a display polariser 218 arranged on the output side of the spatial light modulator 48, the display polariser 218 being a linear polariser; an additional polariser 318 arranged on the output side of display polariser 218, the additional polariser 318 being a linear polariser; and plural polar control retarders 300 arranged between the additional polariser 318 and the display polariser 218, wherein an air gap 619 divides the plural polar control retarders 300 into at least one air gap input retarder 326 between the display polariser 218 and the air gap 619 and at least one air gap output retarder 328 between the air gap 619 and the additional polariser 318, the at least one air gap input retarder 326 being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light 325, and the plural polar control retarders 300 together being capable of simultaneously introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 326, 328, 330, 314 and introducing a net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis 191 inclined to a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300.
In the privacy mode of operation the plural control retarders 300 and additional polariser 318 do not affect the luminance of light from the display polariser 218 passing through the retarders 300 and the additional polariser 318 along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the retarders 300 and simultaneously the retarders 300 and additional polariser 318 do reduce the luminance of light from the display polariser 218 passing therethrough along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the retarders 300, at least in one of the switchable states of the switchable retarder 301. The principles leading to this effect are described in greater detail below with reference to
The plural polar control retarders 300 include at least one passive retarder. In the embodiment of
The spatial light modulator 48 comprises a liquid crystal display comprising input polariser 210, output polariser 218 with substrates 212, 216, liquid crystal pixel layer 214 and red, green and blue pixels 220, 222, 224. In the case when the spatial light modulator 48 is a liquid crystal display, the input electric vector transmission direction 211 at the input polariser 210 provides an input polarisation component that may be transformed by the liquid crystal pixel layer 214 to provide output polarisation component determined by the electric vector transmission direction 219 of the output polariser 218.
Typical polarisers 210, 218, 318 may be linear polarisers such as dichroic polarisers.
The display device 100 further comprises a backlight 20 arranged to output light, wherein the spatial light modulator 48 is a transmissive spatial light modulator arranged to receive output light from the backlight 20.
Backlight 20 may be arranged to illuminate the spatial light modulator 48 and may comprise input light sources 15, waveguide 1, rear reflector 3 and optical stack 5 comprising diffusers, light turning films and other known optical backlight structures. Asymmetric diffusers, that may comprise asymmetric surface relief features for example, may be provided in the optical stack 5 with increased diffusion in the elevation direction in comparison to the lateral direction may be provided. Advantageously image uniformity may be increased.
In the present embodiments, the backlight 20 may be arranged to provide an angular light distribution that has reduced luminance for off-axis viewing positions in comparison to head-on luminance. A typical wide angle backlight has a roll-off at higher angles such that the full width half maximum of relative luminance may be preferably greater than 40°, more preferably greater than 60° and most preferably greater than 80°.
In the embodiment of
In combination with the plural polar control retarders 300 and polariser 318, the luminance for off-axis snoopers in a privacy display may be provided at sufficiently low levels, for example less than 1% and preferably less than 0.5%. In typical operating environments with ambient illuminance to display head-on luminance ratio of 1 lux/nit advantageously a desirable visual security level can be achieved for high contrast images provided by the spatial light modulator 48.
Backlight 20 may further comprise a switchable backlight arranged to switch the output angular luminance profile in order to provide reduced off-axis luminance in a privacy mode of operation and higher off-axis luminance in a public mode of operation. Such a directional backlight provides some off-axis luminance reduction, advantageously increasing head-on efficiency and reducing display visibility and stray light for off-axis locations.
The spatial light modulator 48 may alternatively be provided by other display types that provide output light 400 by emission, such as organic LED displays (OLED), with output polariser 218 in which case backlight 20 is omitted as will be illustrated in
The substrates 312, 316 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprise electrodes arranged to provide a voltage across the layer 314 of liquid crystal material 414. Control system 352 is arranged to control the voltage applied by voltage driver 350 across the electrodes of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301.
Retarder 300 comprises a switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprising a layer 314 of liquid crystal material, and substrates 312, 316 arranged between the reflective polariser 302 and the additional polariser 318. An illustrative example for the arrangement of
Arrangements of plural polar control retarders 300 will now be described in further detail. Plural control retarders are described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,126,575 and in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2018-0321553, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
In one alternative, the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homeotropic alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material. The layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may comprise a liquid crystal material with a negative dielectric anisotropy. The layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 900 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 850 nm.
Where two surface alignment layers providing homeotropic alignment are provided, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a retarder having its optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the at least one passive retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −900 nm, preferably in a range from −450 nm to −800 nm and most preferably in a range from −500 nm to −725 nm.
Alternatively, where two surface alignment layers providing homeotropic alignment are provided, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a pair of retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each retarder of the pair of retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 500 nm to 700 nm and most preferably in a range from 550 nm to 675 nm. Advantageously, in this case increased field of view in public mode of operation may be provided. Further, zero voltage operation in public mode of operation may be provided, reducing power consumption.
In another alternative, the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material. Advantageously in comparison to homeotropic alignment on opposite sides of the liquid crystal, increased resilience to the visibility of flow of liquid crystal material during applied pressure may be achieved.
The layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may comprise a liquid crystal material with a positive dielectric anisotropy. The layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 900 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 850 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 800 nm.
Where two surface alignment layers providing homogeneous alignment are provided, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a retarder having its optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the at least one passive retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −700 nm, preferably in a range from −350 nm to −600 nm and most preferably in a range from −400 nm to −500 nm.
Alternatively, where the two surface alignment layers providing homogeneous alignment are provided, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a pair of retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each retarder of the pair of retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 350 nm to 650 nm and most preferably in a range from 450 nm to 550 nm. Advantageously, in this case increased resilience to the visibility of flow of liquid crystal material during applied pressure may be achieved.
In another alternative, the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and on opposite sides thereof, one of the surface alignment layers being arranged to provide homeotropic alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material and the other of the surface alignment layers being arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material.
When the surface alignment layer arranged to provide homogeneous alignment is between the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and the polar control retarder 330, the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 700 nm to 2000 nm, preferably in a range from 1000 nm to 1500 nm and most preferably in a range from 1200 nm to 1500 nm.
When the surface alignment layer arranged to provide homogeneous alignment is between the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and the polar control retarder 330, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a retarder having its optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the at least one passive retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −400 nm to −1800 nm, preferably in a range from −700 nm to −1500 nm and most preferably in a range from −900 nm to −1300 nm.
When the surface alignment layer arranged to provide homogeneous alignment is between the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and the polar control retarder 330, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a pair of retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each retarder of the pair of retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 400 nm to 1800 nm, preferably in a range from 700 nm to 1500 nm and most preferably in a range from 900 nm to 1300 nm.
When the surface alignment layer arranged to provide homeotropic alignment is between the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and the polar control retarder 330, the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1800 nm, preferably in a range from 700 nm to 1500 nm and most preferably in a range from 900 nm to 1350 nm.
When the surface alignment layer arranged to provide homeotropic alignment is between the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and the polar control retarder 330, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a retarder having its optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the at least one passive retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −1600 nm, preferably in a range from −500 nm to −1300 nm and most preferably in a range from −700 nm to −1150 nm.
When the surface alignment layer arranged to provide homeotropic alignment is between the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414 and the passive polar control retarder 330, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a pair of retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each retarder of the pair of retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 400 nm to 1600 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 1400 nm and most preferably in a range from 800 nm to 1300 nm. Advantageously, in this case increased resilience to the visibility of flow of liquid crystal material during applied pressure may be achieved.
Each alignment layer may have a pretilt having a pretilt direction with a component in the plane of the liquid crystal layer that is parallel or anti-parallel or orthogonal to the electric vector transmission direction of the display polariser. Advantageously a display may be provided with narrow viewing angle in a lateral direction and a wide viewing freedom for display rotation about a horizontal axis. Such a display may be comfortable to view for a head-on display user and difficult to view for an off-axis display user.
The at least one passive retarder may comprise at least two passive retarders with at least two different orientations of optical axes which may have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed. Field of view for liquid crystal retarders with homogeneous alignment is increased while providing resilience to the visibility of flow of liquid crystal material during applied pressure.
The pair of passive retarders may have optical axes that extend at 45° and at 135°, respectively, with respect to an electric vector transmission direction that is parallel to the electric vector transmission of the display polariser. The passive retarders may be provided using stretched films to advantageously achieve low cost and high uniformity.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may be provided between the pair of passive retarders. Advantageously the thickness and complexity of the plural retarders may be reduced.
A transparent electrode and a liquid crystal alignment layer may be formed on a side of each of the pair of passive retarders adjacent the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301; and may further comprise first and second substrates between which the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 is provided, the first and second substrates each comprising one of the pair of passive retarders, wherein each of the pair of passive retarders has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 150 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 200 nm to 700 nm and most preferably in a range from 250 nm to 600 nm.
In one alternative, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder. Advantageously the thickness and complexity of the passive retarder stack may be reduced.
The at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise two passive retarders having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the passive retarders, and the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 is provided between the two passive retarders. Advantageously the thickness and complexity of the plural retarders may be reduced. High head-on efficiency may be achieved in both wide and privacy modes, a wide field of view for public mode and snoopers may be unable to perceive image data from a wide range of off-axis viewing locations.
A transparent electrode and a liquid crystal alignment layer may be formed on a side of each of the two passive retarders adjacent the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301. First and second substrates between which the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may be provided, the first and second substrates each comprising one of the two passive retarders. The two passive retarders may have a total retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −700 nm, preferably in a range from −350 nm to −600 nm and most preferably in a range from −400 nm to −500 nm.
In another alternative, the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a retarder having an optical axis with a component perpendicular to the plane of the retarder and with a component in the plane of the retarder. Advantageously fields of view in public mode may be increased and snoopers may be unable to perceive image data from a wide range of off-axis viewing locations.
The component in the plane of the passive retarder may extend at 0°, with respect to an electric vector transmission direction that is parallel or perpendicular to the electric vector transmission of the display polariser. The at least one passive retarder may further comprise a passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the passive retarder or a pair of passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the passive retarders that are crossed.
The retardance of the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may be equal and opposite to the retardance of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may comprise first and second pretilts; and the at least one passive polar control retarder 330 may comprise a polar control retarder 330 with first and second pretilts, the first pretilt of the polar control retarder 330 being the same as the first pretilt of the liquid crystal retarder and the second pretilt of the polar control retarder 330 being the same as the second pretilt of the liquid crystal retarder.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may further comprise electrodes arranged to apply a voltage for controlling the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414. The electrodes may be on opposite sides of the layer 413 of liquid crystal material 414. The display may be switched by control of the liquid crystal layer, advantageously achieving a switchable privacy display, or other display with reduced off-axis stray light. The display may further comprise a control system arranged to control the voltage applied across the electrodes of the at least one switchable liquid crystal retarder 301.
It would be desirable to provide high contrast for on-axis image viewing of a switchable privacy display in both privacy and public modes of operation. Further it would be desirable to provide an air gap 619 between the spatial light modulator and other components in the optical system to achieve reduced cost and complexity of assembly.
The plural polar control retarders 300 further comprise: an air gap input retarder 326 comprising at least one retarder arranged between the display polariser 218 and the air gap 619; and an air gap output retarder 328 comprising at least one retarder arranged between the air gap 619 and the additional polariser 318.
The air gap input retarder 326 is arranged to provide a phase shift to provide a circularly polarised light component 325 in the air gap 619 of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the air gap input retarder 326.
In combination the plural polar control retarders 300 are capable of simultaneously introducing no phase shift to polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300 and introducing a phase shift to polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300. In the embodiment of
The display device 100 may further comprise a further additional polariser 318 and further polar control retarders (not shown) 300 arranged on the input side of the transmissive spatial light modulator 48 and between the backlight 20 and the spatial light modulator. Advantageously the luminance may be further reduced for off-axis snoopers. Further, wide angle backlights may be used so that viewing angle in public mode of operation may be increased, as described further below with respect to
A view angle control element will now be described.
A view angle control optical element 360 for application to a display device comprising a spatial light modulator 48 and a display polariser 218 arranged on the output side of the spatial light modulator 48, the view angle control optical element 360 comprising a control polariser 318, being a linear polariser, and plural polar control retarders 300 for arrangement between the control polariser 318 and the display polariser 218 on application of the view angle control optical element 360 to the display device, wherein an air gap 619 divides the plural polar control retarders 300 into at least one air gap input retarder 326 and at least one air gap output retarder 328, the at least one air gap input retarder 326 being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light 325, and the plural polar control retarders 300 together being capable of simultaneously introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300 and introducing a net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis 191 inclined to a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300.
Thus the air gap input retarder 326 may be arranged on the output of the display polariser 218, as illustrated in
Advantageously a display apparatus may be fitted with a view angle control element 360 separately to the construction of the display. The fitting may be a retrofit. Image contrast due to frontal reflections for a head-on user may be optimised. Multiple spatial light modulators may be provided for a single view angle control element to increase display area. Thermal and mechanical variations between the spatial light modulator 48 and view angle control element 360 may be mitigated by using the air gap 619. Manufacturing yield may be increased in comparison to bonded optical components.
It may be desirable to increase the visual security level of a display for operation in an ambient illuminance environment.
In comparison to the arrangement of
The structure of
The spatial light modulator 48 of
The display device 100 comprises: a spatial light modulator 48 arranged to output light 400; wherein the spatial light modulator 48 comprises an output polariser 218 arranged on the output side of the spatial light modulator 48; an additional polariser 318 arranged on the output side of the output polariser 218; a reflective polariser 302 arranged between the output polariser 218 and the additional polariser 318; and plural polar control retarders 300 arranged between the reflective polariser 302 and the additional polariser 318. The electric vector transmission direction 303 of the reflective polariser 302 is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser 318. The electric vector transmission direction 303 of the reflective polariser 302 is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 219 of the output polariser 218.
The display device may be arranged for use in ambient illumination 604.
Features of the embodiment of
The reflectivity of the display to ambient illumination 604 may be increased as will now be described.
In the public mode of operation, light rays 400, 402 emitted by the backlight 20 in an on-axis direction have a polarisation component 359 parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 219 of the output polariser 218 on exiting the spatial light modulator 48. The on-axis ray 400 then traverses the plural polar control retarders 300 to the linear polarisation 362 which is the same as component 359. In public mode, the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 is in the off state where typically (but not necessarily) a voltage is not applied. In the case where the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 has a positive dielectric anisotropy, the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 therefore acts in a similar manner to an A-plate retarder in the first state.
The on-axis light ray 400 therefore experiences minimal retardation when passing through the plural polar control retarders 300. The combined effect off the plural polar control retarders 300 results in the on-axis light ray 400 exiting the plural polar control retarders 300 with the same or similar linear polarisation 362 to the linear polarisation 359 with which the on-axis light ray 400 entered the plural polar control retarders 300. This linear polarisation 362 is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser 318 and the on-axis ray 400 therefore exits the display device 100 with a relatively unchanged luminance.
In the public mode, the off-axis ray 402 traverses the plural polar control retarders 300 in a similar fashion to the on-axis ray 400. Polarisation 362 is substantially the same as polarisation 359 and polarisation 364 is substantially the same as polarisation 361. Thus the angular transmission profile is substantially uniformly transmitting across a wide polar region.
In other words, when the layer 314 of liquid crystal material 414 is in a first state of two states, the plural polar control retarders 300 provide no overall retardance to light passing therethrough perpendicular to the plane of the retarders or at an acute angle to the perpendicular to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300.
Advantageously the variation of display luminance with viewing angle in the first state is substantially unmodified. Multiple users may conveniently view the display from a wide range of viewing angles.
The on-axis ray 410 of ambient light 604 traverses the plural polar control retarders 300 in a similar fashion to the on-axis ray 400 emitted from the backlight 20 discussed above. Although the on-axis ray 410 traverses the plural polar control retarders 300 in the reverse direction to the on-axis ray 400 emitted from the backlight 20, the traversal of the plural polar control retarders 300 in a reverse direction may not change the effect of the plural polar control retarders 300 on the light ray as discussed above for light emitted from the backlight 20. The on-axis ray 410 therefore reaches the backlight 20 where it may be absorbed or recirculated as emitted light 400 from the display device 100.
In a similar fashion, the off-axis ray 402 experiences no overall transformation of polarisation when passing through the plural polar control retarders 300. Ambient light 604 is unpolarised and the off-axis light ray initially has no polarisation 370. The additional polariser 318 passes the polarisation 372 that is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser. The additional polariser 318 absorbs the majority of the polarisation 372 that is perpendicular to the electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser. Some light is reflected from the front surface of the polariser 318 by Fresnel reflections at the outer air interface. After traversing the plural polar control retarders 300, the linear polarisation 374 of the off-axis ray 402 is therefore parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 303 of the reflective polariser 302 and the off-axis ray is not reflected but instead passes the reflective polariser 302 to reach the spatial light modulator 448 where it may be absorbed by the input polariser 210 or transmitted into the backlight 20.
Advantageously the display reflectance in the public mode is reduced across a wide range of viewing angles. Multiple users may conveniently view the display from a wide range of viewing angles with high image contrast.
In the privacy mode, the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 is in the on state where a voltage is applied to the liquid crystal layer 314. The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may therefore be in the second state of the said two states. The on-axis light ray 400 experiences no retardation when passing and has the same polarisation as the linear polarisation 362 after traversing the plural polar control retarders 300. The on-axis ray 400 therefore exits the display via the additional polariser 318 with a largely unchanged luminance in the privacy mode of operation.
Off-axis light rays 402 emitted from the backlight 20 experience a transformation of polarisation when passing through plural polar control retarders 300. This is because of the acute angle of entry of the off-axis light ray 402, as discussed in further detail herein. The off-axis light ray 402 therefore arrives at the additional polariser 318 with a linear polarisation 364 that has polarisation components that have a relative phase shift. The linear polarisation 364 has at least some perpendicular component to the electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser 318 and the luminance of the off-axis light ray 402 is therefore reduced compared to the on-axis ray 400.
Advantageously the display luminance at wide viewing angles may be reduced in the second state. Snoopers may therefore be prevented from viewing the image emitted by the display device 100 at wide viewing angles. Stray light may be reduced in night-time operation while the head-on user may see an image.
In privacy mode operation, incident on-axis light rays 410 from the ambient light source 604 traverse the plural polar control retarders 300 in a similar fashion to the on-axis ray 400 emitted from the backlight 20 as described in relation to
In contrast to this, off-axis light rays 412 emitted from the backlight 20 experience a transformation of polarisation when passing through the plural polar control retarders 300. This is because of the acute angle of entry of the off-axis light ray 412, as discussed in further detail below. The off-axis light ray 412 therefore arrives at the reflective polariser 302 with a linear polarisation 374 that is at least partially rotated when compared to the linear polarisation 372. The linear polarisation 374 has at least some perpendicular component to the electric vector transmission direction 303 of the reflective polariser 302 and is therefore at least partially reflected by the reflective polariser 302. The ray 412 then traverses the plural polar control retarders 300 in the reverse direction, reversing the polarisation conversion from the first pass of the plural polar control retarders 300 and resulting in a polarisation 376 that is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction of the additional polariser 318. The off-axis ray 412 therefore leaves the display device 100 with polarisation 378, resulting in the stack appearing as a mirror when viewed from a wide angle. The additional polariser 318 absorbs the majority of the polarisation 372 that is perpendicular to the electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser, but may reflect a small proportion of the perpendicular component 404.
Advantageously the reflectance at wide viewing angles may be increased in the second state. Snoopers may therefore be prevented from viewing the image emitted by the display device 100 at wide viewing angles due to the reflected light reducing the contrast of the image being emitted by the display device, and so increasing visual security level, VSL as described in equation 4, above due to increased reflectivity, R.
The operation of the air gap input retarder 326 and air gap output retarder 328 will now be described.
The air gap input retarder 326 is arranged on one side of the air gap 619 and air gap output retarder 328 is arranged on the opposite side of the air gap 619 and comprise respectively quarter waveplates.
The first and second quarter waveplates of the air gap input and output retarders 326, 328 have optical axes that are crossed; and light 400 from the spatial light modulator 48 has a polarisation that undergoes equal and opposite phase shifts in the first and second crossed retarders 326328.
In operation on-axis ambient light rays 623 are incident onto the reflective polariser 302 with a polarisation 630 that is substantially linear after transmission through the passive polar control retarder 330 and switchable liquid crystal layer 314. The polarisation 630 is parallel to the transmission electric vector direction of the reflective polariser 302 and is transmitted into the quarter waveplate of retarder 328 and undergoes a quarter wave phase shift to provide left circular polarisation 632.
Quarter waveplate of retarder 328 provides an opposite phase shift for transmitted light ray 623 such that light is transmitted by polariser 218 and absorbed in the input polariser 210 or backlight 20 in the example of an LCD, or is extinguished by an optical isolator in the example of an OLED display.
For output light rays 400, the opposite retarders 326, 328 also cancel each other, advantageously achieving high output efficiency.
As illustrated by ambient light rays 625 some of the light at the interface of the quarter waveplate retarder 326 to air gap 619 undergoes a Fresnel reflection at which it undergoes a phase shift providing right circular polarisation 634 that is incident onto quarter waveplate retarder 328 and converted to linear polarisation 636 that is reflected at the reflective polariser 302 that is orthogonal to component 630. Such polarisation is phase shifted to output right circular polarisation 638 that is incident on quarter waveplate of retarder 326 that is phase shifted to linear polarisation state 640 that is extinguished by the display polariser 218.
Further as illustrated by ambient light rays 627, Fresnel reflections from the interface of the waveplate of retarder 328 are absorbed in a similar manner at the display polariser 218.
Advantageously a display with high on-axis contrast and low off-axis contrast may be provided while providing an air gap to increase yield and reduce cost and complexity of assembly.
The operation of the quarter waveplates 326, 328 is similar to that of
Features of the embodiment of
By way of comparison with the present embodiments, the operation of a display with no air gap input retarder 326 and air gap output retarder 328 will now be described.
In operation in privacy mode, off-axis light rays 620 from external light source 604 are directed through the substrate 320 and directed through the retarders 300 towards the reflective polariser 302, at which the polarisation state 621 has polarisations that are orthogonal to the transmission direction of the reflective polariser 302.
Air gap 619 provides Fresnel reflections at the air interfaces of the reflective polariser 302 and display polariser 218, as illustrated by rays 626, 628 that degrade contrast for the on-axis user. An index matched interface may be provided but reduces yield during manufacture.
It would be desirable to provide a public mode of operation that has very wide viewing freedom. Such displays are desirable for large area displays viewed from relatively short viewing distances such as computer monitors for example. The backlight of
Switchable privacy displays may be provided with high visual security level in privacy mode and wide viewing freedom in privacy mode by stacking more than one plural retarder 300 and additional polariser 318 as will be described below.
It would be further desirable to provide a public mode with a wide viewing freedom. Such wide viewing freedom can be achieved from an emissive spatial light modulator 48 or a wide angle backlight 20 and transmissive spatial light modulator 48 as illustrated in
The display device 100 thus further comprises a first-mentioned retarder 300A, a first-mentioned polariser 318A, at least one further retarder 300B and a further additional polariser 318B, wherein the at least one further retarder 300B is arranged between the first-mentioned additional polariser 318A and the further additional polariser 318B.
In an illustrative embodiment, the structure of the retarders 300A, 300B are each the same as the structure of the retarders 300 in
In comparison to the arrangement of
The display 100 may comprise a non-collimated (wide angle) backlight 20. Non-collimated backlights 20 may have reduced sensitivity to tooling and replication errors and may advantageously have reduced cost. Advantageously the present embodiment may achieve very wide viewing angle and image uniformity in a public mode of operation, while having reduced assembly cost and complexity.
The off-axis luminance may be increased, advantageously improving the image visibility to off-axis viewers in public mode. Further, the contrast for the head-on and off-axis users may be improved in public mode of operation. In privacy mode of operation, the contrast for the head-on user may be increased because reflections at air gaps are reduced. Further, the number of bonding steps during manufacture may be reduced and the yield increased.
The embodiment of
For each air gap 619A, 619B air gap input retarders 326A, 326B and air gap output retarders 328A, 328B are arranged on opposite sides of the respective gap. The operation of the retarders for each gap is as illustrated above. Features of the embodiment of
In comparison to
Advantageously a high contrast switchable privacy display can be provided at low cost with a wide angle public mode and high visual security level for off-axis snoopers in privacy mode.
A similar arrangement of
In comparison to the C-plates embodiment of
The pair of passive retarders 330A, 330B have optical axes that extend at 45° and at 135°, respectively, with respect to an electric vector transmission direction 219 that is parallel to the electric vector transmission of the display polariser 218. Advantageously A-plates are simpler to manufacture and lower cost than C-plates.
A further illustrative embodiment of a liquid crystal retarder 301 will now be described with reference to TABLE 3.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer of liquid crystal material 314 and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material 314. The layer of liquid crystal material 314 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises a liquid crystal material 314 with a positive dielectric anisotropy. The layer of liquid crystal material 314 has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 850 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 800 nm.
In comparison to the illustrative embodiment of TABLE 1 that uses homeotropic alignment, the homogeneous alignment of TABLE 3 may provide a display with improved resilience to applied stress. In particular relaxation times for homeotropic alignment are relatively long and may leave noticeable visual defects. While the illustrative embodiments below are provided by liquid crystal retarders 314 that use homogeneous alignment, homeotropic liquid crystal alignment similar to that illustrated in TABLE 1 may also be used. A lower drive voltage in public mode may be provided by homeotropic alignment, advantageously reducing power consumption.
An arrangement of plural polar control retarders 300 in arrangements comprising an air gap between the display polariser 218 and additional polariser 318 will now be further described.
The two passive retarders 330A, 330B introduce no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and at least one compensation retarder comprises a further two passive retarders 330A, 330B which have optical axes 331A, 331B in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the further two passive retarders 330A, 330B being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder 328 and the at least one air gap input retarder 326, the further two passive retarders 330A, 330B introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and the one of the further two passive retarders 326 which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light.
Advantageously a display may be arranged to switch between a public and private mode of operation. Air gaps 619 may be provided while maintaining high contrast for on-axis images and increased manufacturing yield in comparison to arrangements wherein the plural polar control retarders 300 are bonded to the spatial light modulator 48. The retarders 326, 328 may be provided at low cost and complexity. In embodiments with crossed quarter wave retarders 326, 328 no net effect on retardance for on-axis and off-axis light rays is achieved. Advantageously the reflection reduction at the air gap 619 is provided for off-axis viewing positions in public mode, achieving increased contrast.
It would be desirable to reduce the number of retarder layers to reduce cost and complexity. The A-plates of passive compensation retarder can further comprise at least one of the air gap input retarder 326 and air gap output retarder 328, as will now be described.
In comparison to the arrangement of
The two passive retarders 330A, 330B introduce no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and the at least one passive compensation retarder comprises a further two passive retarders 326, 328 which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the further two passive retarders being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder and the at least one air gap input retarder, the further two passive retarders introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders, and the one of the further two passive retarders which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser into circularly polarised light.
One of the two passive retarders has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 150 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 200 nm to 700 nm and most preferably in a range from 250 nm to 600 nm.
Said one of the two passive retarders and the further passive retarder have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, and the other of the two passive retarders has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm that is equal to the retardance of said one of the two passive retarders minus the retardance of the further passive retarder.
In other words, in comparison to the arrangement of
Features of the embodiment of
The two passive retarders 326, 328 introduce no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and at least one compensation retarder comprises a further two passive retarders 330A, 330B which have optical axes 331A, 331B in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the further two passive retarders 330A, 330B being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder 328 and the at least one air gap input retarder 326, the further two passive retarders 330A, 330B introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and the one of the further two passive retarders 326 which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light.
The plural polar control retarders 300 introduce no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and at least one passive polar control retarder 330 comprises a further two passive retarders 328330, 330B which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed. The further two passive retarders are respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder 328 and the at least one air gap input retarder 326, the further two passive retarders introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and the one of the further two passive retarders 326 which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder 326 being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light 325.
In comparison to
Said one of the two passive retarders and the further passive retarder have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are aligned, and the other of the two passive retarders has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm that is equal to the retardance of said one of the two passive retarders plus the retardance of the further passive retarder.
The plural polar control retarders 300 include a switchable liquid crystal retarder comprising a layer of liquid crystal material, the switchable liquid crystal retarder being provided between the pair of passive retarders.
The display device further comprises a transparent electrode and a liquid crystal alignment layer formed on a side of each of the pair of passive retarders adjacent the switchable liquid crystal retarder.
The display device further comprises first and second substrates between which the switchable liquid crystal retarder is provided, the first and second substrates each comprising one of the pair of passive retarders.
The two passive retarders are respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder and the at least one air gap input retarder.
It would be desirable to provide further reduction in the number of retarders used.
In comparison to the arrangements above, the circular polarisation 325 is provided by the first compensation retarder 326330. The second compensation retarder 328330 that is crossed with retarder 328330 provides the desirable viewing angle characteristics. In order to achieve luminance roll-off that is minimised at 45 degrees lateral angle, the retardance of the retarders 326330 and 328330 is increased in comparison to zero order quarter waveplates 326, 328 of other illustrative embodiments herein. Advantageously cost and complexity is reduced while a switchable privacy display is achieved.
Arrangements of retarders for spatial light modulators such as twisted nematic LCDs that do not have a horizontal or vertical linear polarisation state output will now be described.
The display polariser 218 and the additional polariser 318 have electric vector transmission directions 219, 319 that are not parallel, and the display device 100 further comprises a rotator retarder 336 arranged between the additional polariser 318 and the display polariser 218, the rotator retarder 336 being arrange to rotate a polarisation direction of polarised light incident thereon between the electric vector transmission directions of the display polariser 218 and the additional polariser 318. Such an embodiment may be used when the spatial light modulator 48 includes a layer 214 of twisted nematic liquid crystal material.
Advantageously a switchable privacy display may be provided for a twisted nematic LCD while maintaining a lateral roll-off in viewing angle in privacy mode and low reflection from air gaps 619.
Such an arrangement provides the advantages of
The embodiments above have been described for switchable privacy displays. It may be desirable to provide non-switchable displays. The embodiments above have also described privacy displays with a luminance and reflectivity roll-off in a lateral direction. It may be desirable to provide luminance and reflectivity variations that are operable in both landscape and portrait display orientations for example, that is polar luminance and reflectivity profiles that have some degree of circular symmetry.
The plural polar control retarders 300 further comprise two passive retarders 296A, 296B which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the two passive retarders being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder 330, 296B and the at least one air gap input retarder 296A, the two passive retarders 296A, 296B introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and the one of the two passive retarders 296A which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light 325.
The at least one passive polar control retarder 330 comprises a retarder having an optical axis with a component perpendicular to the plane of the retarder. The passive retarder 330 having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −400 nm to −1000 nm and preferably in a range from −750 nm to −850 nm.
The polar profile of
The embodiment of
The at least one passive polar control retarder 330 comprises a retarder having an optical axis with a component perpendicular to the plane of the retarder. The passive retarder 330 having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from +500 nm to +1200 nm and preferably in a range from +950 nm to +1050 nm.
The operation of
A-plates are more conveniently manufactured than C-plates. It would be desirable to provide a passive structure with A-plates.
The at least one passive retarder 330 may comprise a pair of passive retarders 330B, 330C which have optical axes in the plane of the passive retarders that are crossed.
The two passive retarders 326, 328 introduce no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and at least one compensation retarder comprises a further two passive retarders 330A, 330B which have optical axes 331A, 331B in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, the further two passive retarders 330A, 330B being respectively included in the at least one air gap output retarder 328 and the at least one air gap input retarder 326, the further two passive retarders 330A, 330B introducing no net, relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the plural polar control retarders 300, and the one of the further two passive retarders 326 which is arranged in the at least one air gap retarder being arranged to convert linearly polarised light passed by the display polariser 218 into circularly polarised light.
The operation of
Various arrangements of air spaced touch screens will now be described.
Touch electrode arrays 500, 502 may comprise transparent conductors for example ITO, silver nanowires or conductive polymers. They may be formed by know techniques including physical vapour deposition, sputtering, evaporation, ink-jet printing or contact printing. They may be patterned by the use of masks or photo resists and etching. When the electrodes are formed on the flexible retarder substrates, for example PC or COC/COP, then the type and temperature of the electrode deposition process may be controlled to avoid melting or the substrate. Inherently low temperature processes such as ink-jet and contact printing can produce electrode layers without exceeding the glass transition temperature of the substrates. The electrode arrays 500, 502 may be conveniently formed on the retarders 330A, 330B and low tolerance alignment may be provided between the two layers. Advantageously cost may be reduced while high contrast is maintained and touch screen operation enabled.
Features of the embodiments of
It would be desirable to provide further reduction of off-axis luminance by means of directional illumination from the spatial light modulator 48. Directional illumination of the spatial light modulator 48 by directional backlights 20 will now be described.
A Lambertian backlight has a luminance profile 846 that is independent of viewing angle.
A typical wide angle backlight has a roll-off 844 at higher angles such that the full width half maximum 866 of relative luminance may be greater than 40°, preferably greater than 60° and most preferably greater than 80°. Further the relative luminance 864 at +/−45°, is preferably greater than 7.5%, more preferably greater than 10% and most preferably greater than 20%.
By way of comparison a directional backlight 20 has a roll-off at higher angles such that the full width half maximum 862 of relative luminance may be less than 60°, preferably less than 40° and most preferably less than 20°. Further the backlight 20 may provide a luminance at polar angles to the normal to the spatial light modulator 48 greater than 45 degrees that is at most 33% of the luminance along the normal to the spatial light modulator 48, preferably at most 20% of the luminance along the normal to the spatial light modulator 48, and most preferably at most 10% of the luminance along the normal to the spatial light modulator 48.
Scatter and diffraction in the spatial light modulator 48 may degrade privacy mode operation when the switchable retarder 300 is arranged between the input display polariser 210 and additional polariser 318. The luminance at polar angles to the normal to the spatial light modulator greater than 45 degrees may be increased in arrangements wherein the switchable retarder 300 is arranged between the output display polariser 218 and additional polariser 318 in comparison to arrangements wherein the switchable retarder 300 is arranged between the input display polariser 210 and additional polariser 318.
Advantageously lower off-axis luminance may be achieved for the arrangement of
The imaging waveguides 1 is of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,519,153, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. The waveguide 1 has an input end 2 extending in a lateral direction along the waveguide 1. An array of light sources 15 are disposed along the input end 2 and input light into the waveguide 1.
The waveguide 1 also has opposed first and second guide surfaces 6, 8 extending across the waveguide 1 from the input end 2 to a reflective end 4 for guiding light input at the input end 2 forwards and back along the waveguide 1. The second guide surface 8 has a plurality of light extraction features 12 facing the reflective end 4 and arranged to deflect at least some of the light guided back through the waveguide 1 from the reflective end 4 from different input positions across the input end 2 in different directions through the first guide surface 6 that are dependent on the input position.
In operation, light rays are directed from light source array 15 through an input end and are guided between first and second guiding surfaces 6, 8 without loss to a reflective end 4. Reflected rays are incident onto facets 12 and output by reflection as light rays 230 or transmitted as light rays 232. Transmitted light rays 232 are directed back through the waveguide 1 by facets 803, 805 of rear reflector 800. Operation of rear reflectors are described further in U.S. Pat. No. 10,054,732, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As illustrated in
Thus for off-axis viewing positions observed by snoopers 47 may have reduced luminance, for example between 1% and 3% of the central peak luminance at an elevation of 0 degrees and lateral angle of +/−45 degrees. Further reduction of off-axis luminance is achieved by the plural retarders 301, 330 of the present embodiments.
Another type of directional backlight with low off-axis luminance will now be described.
The waveguide 901 has an input end 902 extending in a lateral direction along the waveguide 901. An array of light sources 915 are disposed along the input end 902 and input light into the waveguide 1. The waveguide 901 also has opposed first and second guide surfaces 906, 908 extending across the waveguide 1 from the input end 2 to a reflective end 4 for guiding light input at the input end 2 forwards and back along the waveguide 1. In operation, light is guided between the first and second guiding surface 906, 908.
The first guiding surface 906 may be provided with a lenticular structure 904 comprising a plurality of elongate lenticular elements 905 and the second guiding surface 908 may be provided with prismatic structures 912 which are inclined and act as light extraction features. The plurality of elongate lenticular elements 905 of the lenticular structure 904 and the plurality of inclined light extraction features deflect input light guided through the waveguide 901 to exit through the first guide surface 906.
A rear reflector 903 that may be a planar reflector is provided to direct light that is transmitted through the surface 908 back through the waveguide 901.
Output light rays that are incident on both the prismatic structures 912 and lenticular elements 905 of the lenticular structure 904 are output at angles close to grazing incidence to the surface 906. A prismatic turning film 926 comprising facets 927 is arranged to redirect output light rays 234 by total internal reflection through the spatial light modulator 48 and compensated switchable liquid crystal retarder 300.
Advantageously in regions in which snoopers may be located with lateral angles of 45 degrees or greater for example, the luminance of output from the display is small, typically less than 2%. It would be desirable to achieve further reduction of output luminance. Such further reduction is provided by the compensated switchable liquid crystal retarder 300 and additional polariser 318 as illustrated in
Directional backlights such as the types described in
The operation of a switchable privacy display comprising an emissive spatial light modulator and an air spaced view angle control element will now be described.
In an alternative for the display device 100, the spatial light modulator may comprise an emissive spatial light modulator 48 arranged to output light. In that case, the display polariser 218 may be an output display polariser arranged on the output side of the emissive spatial light modulator 48. Advantageously display thickness may be reduced in comparison to displays with backlights, and flexible and bendable displays may be conveniently provided.
The spatial light modulator may have a pixel layer 514, support substrates 512, 516. The pixel layer 514 may be partially reflective to incident ambient light so that a quarter waveplate retarder 518 may be provided between the display polariser 218 and the pixel layer 514 to minimise reflection. The retarder 518 is different in operation to the retarders of the present retarders disclosed elsewhere herein and does not provide circular symmetry to polar output profiles or reduction of reflectivity at air gaps.
Such an emissive display typically provides high angular range of optical output, that may be Lambertian or similar to Lambertian in profile.
To achieve desirable off-axis visual security level in a privacy mode multiple view angle control retarders 300A, 300B, and additional polariser 318A, and further additional polariser 318B may be provided. In the embodiment of
The first plural polar control retarders 300A are passive retarders 296A, 330A, 296B of the type illustrated in
The operation of retarder layers between parallel polarisers for off-axis illumination will now be described further. In the various devices described above, at least one retarder is arranged between the reflective polariser 318 and the additional polariser 218 in various different configurations. In each case, the at least one retarder is configured so that it does not affect the luminance of light passing through the reflective polariser 318, the at least one retarder, and the additional polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the retarder(s) but it does reduce the luminance of light passing through the reflective polariser 318, the at least one retarder, and the additional polariser 218 along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the retarder(s), at least in one of the switchable states of the compensated switchable retarder 300. There will now be given a description of this effect in more detail, the principles of which may be applied in general to all of the devices described above.
The retardance of the retarder 630 is thus dependent on the angle of incidence of the respective ray, and the plane of incidence, that is rays 638 in the x-z will have a retardance different from the normal rays 636 and the rays 637 in the y-z plane.
The interaction of polarized light with the retarder 630 will now be described. To distinguish from the first and second polarization components during operation in a directional backlight 101, the following explanation will refer to third and fourth polarization components.
At the design wavelength and for light propagating normally along ray 636 then the output polarization may be rotated by 90 degrees to a linear polarization state 640 at −45 degrees. Light propagating along ray 637 may see a phase difference that is similar but not identical to the phase difference along ray 637 due to the change in thickness, and thus an elliptical polarization state 639 may be output which may have a major axis similar to the linear polarization axis of the output light for ray 636.
By way of contrast, the phase difference for the incident linear polarization state along ray 638 may be significantly different, in particular a lower phase difference may be provided. Such phase difference may provide an output polarization state 644 that is substantially circular at a given inclination angle 642. Thus, the retarder 630 introduces a phase shift to polarisation components of light passed by the polariser on the input side of the retarder 630 along an axis corresponding to ray 638 that is inclined to a normal to the plane of the retarder 630. Although
To illustrate the off-axis behaviour of retarder stacks, the angular luminance control of C-plates 308A, 308B between an additional polariser 318 and output display polariser 218 will now be described for various off-axis illumination arrangements with reference to the operation of a C-plate between the parallel polarisers 218, 210 will now be described.
To illustrate the off-axis behaviour of retarder stacks, the angular luminance control of crossed A-plates 308A, 308B between an additional polariser 318 and output display polariser 218 will now be described for various off-axis illumination arrangements.
The output polarisation component is aligned to the electric vector transmission direction of the additional polariser 318, and thus is transmitted efficiently. Advantageously substantially no losses are provided for light rays that have zero lateral angle angular component so that full transmission efficiency is achieved.
Thus the retarder comprises a pair of retarders 308A, 308B which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders 308A, 308B that are crossed, that is the x-y plane in the present embodiments. The pair of retarders 308A, 308B have optical axes 309A, 309B that each extend at 45° with respect to an electric vector transmission direction that is parallel to the electric vector transmission of the polariser 318.
Advantageously substantially no losses are provided for light rays that have zero elevation angular component so that full transmission efficiency is achieved.
Thus luminance is reduced for light rays that have non-zero lateral angle and non-zero elevation components. Advantageously display privacy can be increased for snoopers that are arranged in viewing quadrants while luminous efficiency for primary display users is not substantially reduced.
As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provide an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from zero percent to ten percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, angles, et cetera. Such relativity between items ranges between approximately zero percent to ten percent.
While various embodiments in accordance with the principles disclosed herein have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of this disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with any claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the embodiment(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that certain technology is prior art to any embodiment(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the embodiment(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple embodiments may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the embodiment(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3914022 | Kashnow | Oct 1975 | A |
| 4059916 | Tachihara et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4586790 | Umeda et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4621898 | Cohen | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4974941 | Gibbons et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5005108 | Pristash et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5035491 | Kawagishi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5126882 | Oe et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5608550 | Epstein et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5658490 | Sharp et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5671994 | Tai et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5715028 | Abileah et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5779337 | Saito et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5791757 | O'Neil et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5808784 | Ando et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835166 | Hall et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5852509 | Coleman | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854872 | Tai | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5894361 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5914760 | Daiku | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5997148 | Ohkawa | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6055103 | Woodgate et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6099758 | Verrall et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6144433 | Tillin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6169589 | Kaneko | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6204904 | Tillin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6222672 | Towler et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6280043 | Ohkawa | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6364497 | Park et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379016 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6392727 | Larson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6437915 | Moseley et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6731355 | Miyashita | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6752505 | Parker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6987550 | Takato et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7067985 | Adachi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072096 | Holman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7163319 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7227602 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7366392 | Honma et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7524542 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528893 | Schultz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7528913 | Kobayashi | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7633586 | Winlow et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7660047 | Travis et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7766534 | Iwasaki | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7834834 | Takatani et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7970246 | Travis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7991257 | Coleman | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8070346 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8098350 | Sakai et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8154686 | Mather et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8228476 | Shibazaki | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8237876 | Tan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8249408 | Coleman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8262271 | Tillin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8469575 | Weber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8646931 | Choi et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8801260 | Urano et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8848132 | O'Neill et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8939595 | Choi et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8973149 | Buck | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9195087 | Terashima | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9274260 | Urano et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9304241 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9324234 | Ricci et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9448355 | Urano et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9501036 | Kang et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9519153 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9541698 | Wheatley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9798169 | Su et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 10054732 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10067726 | Wakamoto et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10126575 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
| 10146093 | Sakai et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10216018 | Fang et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10288914 | Chung et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10303030 | Robinson et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10401638 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10424232 | Schubert et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10488705 | Xu et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10527775 | Yang et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10627670 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10649248 | Jiang et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
| 10649259 | Lee et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10712608 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10802356 | Harrold et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10935714 | Woodgate et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10948648 | Ihas et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10976578 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11016341 | Robinson et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11070791 | Woodgate et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11079645 | Harrold et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11079646 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11092851 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11099433 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11099448 | Woodgate et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11237417 | Woodgate et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
| 11327358 | Robinson et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11366358 | Wu et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
| 11442316 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
| 20010024561 | Cornelissen et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020015300 | Katsu et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020024529 | Miller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020171793 | Sharp et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030030764 | Lee | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058381 | Shinohara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089956 | Allen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030107686 | Sato et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117792 | Kunimochi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030169499 | Bourdelais et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214615 | Colgan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222857 | Abileah | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015729 | Elms et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100598 | Adachi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125430 | Kasajima et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141107 | Jones | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145703 | O'Connor et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223094 | Hamada et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240777 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264910 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002174 | Min et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111100 | Mather et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117186 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135116 | Epstein et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157225 | Toyooka et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190326 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190329 | Okumura | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213348 | Parikka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219693 | Hartkop et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050243265 | Winlow et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259205 | Sharp et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270798 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060066785 | Moriya | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082702 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098296 | Woodgate et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146405 | MacMaster | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203162 | Ito et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215244 | Yosha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244884 | Jeon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262255 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262258 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262558 | Cornelissen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268207 | Tan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285040 | Kobayashi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070008471 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070024970 | Lub et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030240 | Sumiyoshi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035964 | Olczak | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047254 | Schardt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064163 | Tan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076406 | Kodama et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139772 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223251 | Liao | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070268427 | Uehara | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285775 | Lesage et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080008434 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080068329 | Shestak et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080068862 | Shimura | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080106689 | Inoue et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080129899 | Sharp | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158491 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158912 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205066 | Ohta et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285310 | Aylward et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316198 | Fukushima et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090009894 | Chuang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090040426 | Mather et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085894 | Gandhi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086509 | Omori et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109381 | Haruyama | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109703 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128735 | Larson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128746 | Kean et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135623 | Kunimochi | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090174843 | Sakai et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213147 | Sagardoyburu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213298 | Mimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213305 | Ohmuro et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244415 | Ide | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100002296 | Choi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100014313 | Tillin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100066960 | Smith et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128200 | Morishita et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100149459 | Yabuta et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177113 | Gay | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100187704 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205667 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100214324 | Broughton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238376 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100283930 | Park et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289989 | Adachi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295755 | Broughton et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100328438 | Ohyama et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110018860 | Parry-Jones et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110032483 | Hruska et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176089 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241573 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241983 | Chang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255304 | Kinoshita | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286222 | Coleman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110321143 | Angaluri et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120002121 | Pirs et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120020078 | Chang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120086875 | Yokota | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120351 | Kawata | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120127573 | Robinson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147026 | Gass et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147280 | Osterman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120170315 | Fan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120188792 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120212414 | Osterhout et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235891 | Nishitani et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120294037 | Holman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299913 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314145 | Robinson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120320311 | Gotou et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120327101 | Blixt et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130039062 | Vinther et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130057807 | Goto et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130100097 | Martin | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130107174 | Yun et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120817 | Yoon et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128165 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242231 | Kurata et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242612 | Lee et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130278544 | Cok | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293793 | Lu | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130300985 | Bulda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130307831 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308339 | Woodgate et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321340 | Seo et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130328866 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140009508 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140022619 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140071382 | Scardato | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098418 | Lin | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098558 | Vasylyev | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104147 | Nakahara et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140111760 | Guo et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140132887 | Kurata | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140133181 | Ishida et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140091 | Vasylyev | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140095 | Yuki et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176873 | Shinohara et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140185322 | Liao | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201844 | Buck | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140211125 | Kurata | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140232836 | Woodgate et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140232960 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240344 | Tomono et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240828 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240839 | Yang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140268358 | Kusaka et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140286043 | Sykora et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140286044 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140289835 | Varshavsky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140340728 | Taheri | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361990 | Leister | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140367873 | Yang et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150035872 | Shima et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150055366 | Chang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150116212 | Freed et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150177447 | Woodgate et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150177563 | Cho et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150185398 | Chang et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150205157 | Sakai et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150268479 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150286061 | Seo et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150286817 | Haddad et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150293273 | Chen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150293289 | Shinohara et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150301400 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150338564 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150346417 | Powell | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150346532 | Do et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355490 | Kao et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150378085 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160054508 | Hirayama et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160103264 | Lee et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160132721 | Bostick et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160147074 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160154259 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160216420 | Gaides et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160216540 | Cho et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160224106 | Liu | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160238869 | Osterman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160259115 | Kitano et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160291358 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160334898 | Kwak et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160349444 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160356943 | Choi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160357046 | Choi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170003436 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170031206 | Smith et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170085869 | Choi et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170090103 | Holman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170090237 | Kim et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170092187 | Bergquist | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170092229 | Greenebaum et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170115485 | Saito et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170123241 | Su et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170139110 | Woodgate et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170168633 | Kwak et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170205558 | Hirayama et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170236494 | Sommerlade et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170269283 | Wang et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170269285 | Hirayama et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170276960 | Osterman et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170315423 | Serati et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170329399 | Azam et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170336661 | Harrold et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170339398 | Woodgate et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170343715 | Fang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170363798 | Hirayama et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170363913 | Yi | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180011173 | Newman | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180014007 | Brown | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180052346 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180082068 | Lancioni et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180095581 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180113334 | Fang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188576 | Xu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188603 | Fang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180196275 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180210243 | Fang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180210253 | Kashima | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180231811 | Wu | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180252949 | Klippstein et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180259799 | Kroon | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180259812 | Goda et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180284341 | Woodgate et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180321523 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180321553 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180329245 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180364526 | Finnemeyer et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190086706 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190121173 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190154896 | Yanai | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190196235 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190196236 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190197928 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190215509 | Woodgate et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190227366 | Harrold et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190235304 | Tamada et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190250458 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190278010 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190293858 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190293983 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190353944 | Acreman et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190361165 | Chang et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200026125 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200041839 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200110301 | Harrold et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200159055 | Robinson et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200185590 | Malhotra et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200218101 | Ilhas et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200225402 | Ihas et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200233142 | Liao et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20210033898 | Woodgate et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210116627 | Tsuji | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210149233 | Robinson et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210271121 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210373382 | Sakai et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2222313 | Jun 1998 | CA |
| 1125943 | Oct 2003 | CN |
| 1690800 | Nov 2005 | CN |
| 1776484 | May 2006 | CN |
| 101042449 | Sep 2007 | CN |
| 101256251 | Sep 2008 | CN |
| 101435952 | May 2009 | CN |
| 101454712 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101518095 | Aug 2009 | CN |
| 101681061 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 102540544 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 103109226 | May 2013 | CN |
| 103473494 | Dec 2013 | CN |
| 103688211 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 103988121 | Aug 2014 | CN |
| 104133292 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 104303085 | Jan 2015 | CN |
| 104321686 | Jan 2015 | CN |
| 104380177 | Feb 2015 | CN |
| 104597661 | May 2015 | CN |
| 204740413 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105842909 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105960609 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 106104372 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106415342 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 107102460 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 209171779 | Jul 2019 | CN |
| 1956423 | Aug 2008 | EP |
| 2037318 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2248100 | Mar 1992 | GB |
| 2405542 | Mar 2005 | GB |
| 2418518 | Mar 2006 | GB |
| 2428100 | Jan 2007 | GB |
| 2428345 | Jan 2007 | GB |
| 2482065 | Jan 2012 | GB |
| 2486935 | Sep 2013 | GB |
| S58143305 | Aug 1983 | JP |
| H01130783 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| H10268251 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| H11174489 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 2005316470 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2005345799 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2006139160 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2006201326 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2007501966 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007148279 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007273288 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 2008310271 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2009020293 | Jan 2009 | JP |
| 2011103241 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2014032953 | Feb 2014 | JP |
| 2014099363 | May 2014 | JP |
| 20120011228 | Feb 2012 | KR |
| 20130046116 | May 2013 | KR |
| 1020150021937 | Mar 2015 | KR |
| 1020170013915 | Feb 2017 | KR |
| 1020170040565 | Apr 2017 | KR |
| 101990286 | Jun 2019 | KR |
| M537663 | Mar 2017 | TW |
| I612360 | Jan 2018 | TW |
| 2005071449 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2006030702 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2008001896 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008078764 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008093445 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009008406 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009011199 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2010021926 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010143705 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2014011328 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014130860 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2015040776 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| 2015057625 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015143227 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015157184 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| 2015190311 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2015200814 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2016195786 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| 2017050631 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2017117570 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| 2018003380 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| 2018035492 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| 2018178790 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| 2018208618 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| 2018221413 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| 2019055755 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| 2019067846 | Apr 2019 | WO |
| 2019090252 | May 2019 | WO |
| 2019147762 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| 2021003383 | Jan 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Chiu, et al, “Advanced Hyoer-Viewing Angle Controllable LCD”, 39-1 / M.-H. Chiu Invited Paper; AUO Technology Center, AU Optronics Corp., Hsinchu, Taiwan, SID 2021 Digest, ISSN 0097-996X/21/5202-0543, pp. 543-545. |
| CN-201880042320.X Notification of the Third Office Action from the Chinese Patent Office dated Dec. 30, 2022. |
| CN-201980082757.0 Notification of the 1st Office Action of the Chinese Patent Office dated Dec. 5, 2022. |
| JP2020-540724 Non-Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Jan. 4, 2023. |
| JP-2020-540797 Non-Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection from the Japan Patent Office dated Dec. 6, 2022. |
| PCT/US2022/045030 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 3, 2023. |
| EP-20835231.0 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated May 15, 2023. |
| PCT/US2023/012240 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Apr. 27, 2023. |
| PCT/US2023/012243 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated May 10, 2023. |
| PCT/US2021/029958 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Aug. 10, 2021. |
| PCT/US2021/043435 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 1, 2021. |
| PCT/US2021/043444 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 1, 2021. |
| Robson, et al. “Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., vol. 56, pp. 1141-1142 (1966). |
| Simonyan et al., “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition”, ICLR 2015. |
| Weindorf et al., “Active Circular Polarizer OLED E-Mirror”, Proceedings of the Society for Information Display 25th Annual Symposium of Vehicle Displays, Livonia, MI, pp. 225-237, Sep. 25-26, 2018. |
| CN201980030279.9 Notification of the First Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2022. |
| EP-19825448.4 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Mar. 10, 2022. |
| JP2019-561773 Non-Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Mar. 22, 2022. |
| EP19771688.9 Notification of the First Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2023. |
| JP2020-550747 Non-Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Mar. 29, 2023. |
| KR10-2020-7010753 Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Feb. 17, 2023. |
| EP-20754927.0 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Sep. 19, 2022. |
| EP-19881483.2 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Aug. 5, 2022. |
| JP2020-509511 Non-Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Jul. 19, 2022. |
| Nelkon et al., “Advanced Level Physics”, Third edition with SI units, Heinemann Educational Books LTD, London, 1970. |
| TW107132221 First Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2022. |
| Adachi, et al. “P-228L: Late-News Poster: Controllable Viewing-Angle Displays using a Hybrid Aligned Nematic Liquid Crystal Cell”, ISSN, SID 2006 Digest, pp. 705-708. |
| Brudy et al., “Is Anyone Looking? Mitigating Shoulder Surfing on Public Displays through Awareness and Protection”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Persuasive Displays (Jun. 3, 2014), pp. 1-6. |
| Cheng, et al., “Fast-Response Liquid Crystal Variable Optical Retarder and Multilevel Attenuator,” Optical Engineering 52 (10), 107105 (Oct. 16, 2013). (Year: 2013). |
| CN201680061632.6 Notification of the First Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2021. |
| CN201780030715.3 Notification of the First Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2020. |
| CN201880042320.X Notification of the First Office Action dated May 25, 2021. |
| CN201880073578.6 Notification of the First Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2021. |
| CN-201980020303.0—Notification of the First Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2021. |
| EP-16860628.3 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Apr. 26, 2019. |
| EP-17799963.8 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Oct. 9, 2019. |
| EP-18855604.7 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Jun. 1, 2021. |
| EP-18857077.4 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Jun. 16, 2021. |
| EP-19743619.9 Extended European Search of European Patent Office dated Nov. 23, 2021. |
| EP-19743701.5 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Nov. 24, 2021. |
| EP19771688.9 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Dec. 2, 2021. |
| Gass, et al. “Privacy LCD Technology for Cellular Phones”, Sharp Laboratories of Europe Ltd, Mobile LCD Group, Feb. 2007, pp. 45-49. |
| Ishikawa, T., “New Design for a Highly Collimating Turning Film”, SID 06 Digest, pp. 514-517. |
| Kalantar, et al. “Backlight Unit With Double Surface Light Emission”, J. Soc. Inf. Display, vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 379-387 (Dec. 2004). |
| PCT/US2016/058695 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 28, 2017. |
| PCT/US2017/032734 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 27, 2017. |
| PCT/US2018/031206 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 20, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/031218 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 21, 2019. |
| PCT/US2018/031218 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 19, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/051021 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 21, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/051027 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 30, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/053328 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 30, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/059249 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| PCT/US2018/059256 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/014889 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated May 24, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/014902 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jun. 25, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/023659 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jun. 10, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/038409 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Sep. 19, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/038466 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 5, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/042027 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Oct. 15, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/054291 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 6, 2020. |
| PCT/US2019/059990 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 28, 2020. |
| PCT/US2019/066208 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 27, 2020. |
| PCT/US2020/017537 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Apr. 29, 2020. |
| PCT/US2020/040686 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 20, 2020. |
| PCT/US2020/044574 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Oct. 21, 2020. |
| PCT/US2020/053863 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Mar. 12, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/060155 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 5, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/060191 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 8, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/063638 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Mar. 2, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/064633 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Mar. 15, 2021. |
| PCT/US2021/029937 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Aug. 6, 2021. |
| PCT/US2021/029944 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Aug. 3, 2021. |
| PCT/US2021/029947 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Aug. 10, 2021. |
| PCT/US2021/029954 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Aug. 10, 2021. |
| EP-20851155.0 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Aug. 2, 2023. |
| PCT/US2023/017639 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 6, 2023. |
| CN201980056000.4 Notification of the First Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2023. |
| CN201980056022.0 Notification of the First Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2023. |
| CN202080020818.3 Notification of the First Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2023. |
| CN202080059812.7 Notification of the First Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2023. |
| EP-20872625.7 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Sep. 20, 2023. |
| EP-20887527.8 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Nov. 20, 2023. |
| JP2021-518864 Non-Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Oct. 24, 2023. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220252915 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62796423 | Jan 2019 | US | |
| 62789322 | Jan 2019 | US | |
| 62691896 | Jun 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17175096 | Feb 2021 | US |
| Child | 17679337 | US | |
| Parent | 16448235 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Child | 17175096 | US |
