Optical switch and router

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6718083
  • Patent Number
    6,718,083
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 24, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 6, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An optical switch and optical router to rapidly (in the range of nanoseconds to picoseconds) route signals from particular channels within an optical band by using optical switches which utilize a controlled whispering gallery mode (WGM) resonance of dielectric microspheres to optically switch signal by virtue of their evanescent waves.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Throughout this application one or more publications are referenced with parentheses. The disclosures of such publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference in this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains.




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates generally to optical switching. In particular, the invention relates to methods, devices and systems to optically switch a specific channel of light between optical fibers.




2. Discussion of the Related Arts




Dielectric microspheres are known in the art. It has been shown that a microsphere of the appropriate proportions can form a wavelength specific connection from one optical fiber to another by virtue of the dielectric microsphere's resonance in a whispering gallery mode (WGM) for the specific wavelength. The WGM may be used to switch light transmission from one optical fiber to another. Depending on the placement of the microsphere and nature of the optical fibers, fairly high efficiency of light transfer may be achieved. Ming, Cai and Kerry Vahala Opt. Lett 25, No. 4, 260 (2000).




Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) is a technique which has been used to enhance the signal capacity of a single mode optical fiber by simultaneously transmitting multiple discreet wavelengths of light, referred to as “channels” in a single band. The wavelengths in each channel are separated by a pre-determined spacing usually in the order of hundreds of GHZ. Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) systems are characterized by closer spacing between the respective wavelengths comprising the channels thereby allowing for a greater number of channels within the same band in the same optical fiber as compared to WDM.




The speed of routing from one optical fiber to another is limited by the rate at which the optical switching occurs. In the past, switches which convert the optical data to electronic data have been a “bottleneck” in the system. Those acquainted with optical switching will recall that much interest has been shown in achieving the goal of a direct optical to optical switch which would eliminate the bottleneck caused by the optical to electronic conversions of the past. A variety of devices have been developed in pursuit of achieving this goal.




Common to many optical to optical switches and optical routers is an all or nothing functionality by which the entire signal, within a channel, is switched or not switched. While useful for small or local networks, especially those networks with easily controlled light sources (lasers), in larger or less controlled environments an optical router must be able to accept signals from a variety of sources and seamlessly multiplex despite, difference in the quality of the signals. Optical switches lacking the ability to monitor, equalize and/or groom the channels in nanoseconds or even picoseconds, (which is “real time” for optical transmissions) may yield turbidity within a band resulting in unbalanced light transmissions (signals) from channel to channel which in turn may cause noise, loss of part of a signal or channels to drop out.




Accordingly, there exists a need for an optical switch and router that operate in “real time” (which is in the order of nanoseconds or picoseconds) for light transmission. There also exists a need for an optical router of “real time” optical switches which can monitor, groom, and/or balance a channel relative to the other channels in an optical band. The present invention satisfies these needs and others and provides related advantages.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a novel and improved method, system and device to rapidly (in the range of nanoseconds and event picoseconds) route signals from particular channels within an optical band by using optical switches which utilize the whispering gallery mode (WGM) resonance of dielectric microspheres to optically switch signal. All references made hereinafter to microsphere(s) shall refer to dielectric microsphere(s).




In all embodiments an optical router is formed of a series of optical switches. Common to the optical switches is the placement of a microsphere in proximity to the unclad or thinly clad regions of a pair of optical fibers. To switch the signal of a particular channel (wavelength of light) between optical fibers, the evanescent waves emanating from the electromagnetic fields associated with the signal in the particular channel are allowed to resonate across a wavelength specific microsphere via the WGM of the microsphere to another optical fiber.




In one embodiment of the optical router, the optical switches are formed of microspheres. Each microsphere has a steady state index of refraction “n” and will resonate in WGM for a specific wavelength of light (channel) when positioned between optical fibers at a region of thinned or removed cladding with substantially similar indexes of refraction.




Switching is accomplished by controlling the steady state index of refraction “n” of a microsphere. A pair of electrodes placed on either side of each microsphere can be used to apply a voltage across the microsphere. When an adequate voltage is applied across the electrode pair the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere is altered by the polarizing effect of the voltage on the substrate of the microsphere. The polarization changes the dielectric constant of the substrate which in turn alters the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere. In the case where the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere is substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers the voltage will cause the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere to become sufficiently dissimilar from the index of refraction of the optical fibers to preclude WGM resonance.




To switch a particular optical switch within the optical router the voltage across the electrode pair need only be briefly interrupted (in the order of a few nanoseconds to a few picoseconds), to allow the signal to pass from one optical fiber to another. Accordingly, an optical router useful for WDM, DWDM and wavelength division de-multiplexing is achieved.




Conversely, by selecting a microsphere with a steady state index of refraction “n” dissimilar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers and applying sufficient voltage across the electrode pair to alter the index of refraction of the microsphere it would be substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers thereby enabling WGM resonance of the microsphere while the voltage is applied.




Adjustment of the voltage may also provide for a controllable index of refraction of “n±x,” for the microsphere, wherein as “x” approaches zero the efficiency of the transfer of signal approaches the microsphere's maximum obtainable efficiency which may be useful for applications such as channel equalizing, grooming and power balancing.




In another embodiment, a plurality microspheres are provided, each with a light activated material, such as a dye, integrated within their substrate. To form the optical router, a series of optical switches, each containing microspheres selected to resonate in WGM for specific channels, are positioned in close proximity to an unclad or thinly clad region in each of two optical fibers.




Each optical switch operates by controlling the irradiation of the microsphere with an appropriately intense beam of light. The irradiation will activate the light activated material and depending on the selection of the light activated material and microsphere substrate, the irradiation will either change the dielectric constant of the light activated material and affect the average dielectric constant of the microsphere, or affect the dielectric constant of the light activated material and the substrate, thereby altering the dielectric constant of the microsphere. In either case, the change in the dielectric constant will alter the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere.




If the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere is substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers, the irradiation can be used to alter the steady state index of refraction “n” to become dissimilar to that of the optical fibers and disrupt the WGM resonance. A practical application of such a microsphere would be to maintain an appropriately intense beam of light directed at the microsphere until switching of the channel corresponding to that microsphere is required. A brief interruption in the intense beam of light will result in switching. On the other hand, if the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere is dissimilar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers, a brief pulse of irradiation can be used to alter the index of refraction “n” of the microsphere to become substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers and thereby switch the channel by enabling the WGM resonance.




In either case, by passing the intense beam of light through a Mach-Zender interferometer the speed at which the intense beam of light can be pulsed “on” or “off” is in the range of nanoseconds to picoseconds.




Moreover, adjustment of the intensity of the intense beam of light, in either case, may also provide for a controllable index of refraction of “n±x,” for the microsphere, wherein as “x” approaches zero, the efficiency of the transfer of signal approaches the microsphere's maximum obtainable efficiency which may be useful for applications such as channel equalizing, grooming and power balancing.




In another embodiment of an optical router, each microsphere comprising a specific optical switch has a steady state index of refraction “n” which always corresponds to the index of refraction of the optical fibers. Optical switching occurs when the selected microsphere is physically contained within an optical trap an moved towards the unclad or thinly clad regions of two optical fibers. At some proximity from the optical fibers the evanescent wave, associated with the signal of the selected channel, will traverse the surface of the selected microsphere via WGM resonance, and switch signal one optical fiber to another optical fiber. When the switching is completed, the optical trap is quickly withdrawn and the microsphere ceases to resonate the signal in WGM.




Adjustment of the proximity of the microsphere to the stripped or thinly cladded region of the optical fibers will provide a controllable index of refraction of “n±x” for the microsphere, wherein as “x” approaches zero, the efficiency of the transfer of signal approaches the microsphere's maximum obtainable efficiency which may be useful for applications such as channel equalizing, grooming and power balancing.




In each embodiment the routing of the appropriate wavelength of light from one optical fiber to another is dependent on the propagation of an evanescent wave to a corresponding microsphere which acts in a WGM. The switching “on” or “off” of the microsphere is either by physical movement or by altering the microsphere's steady state index of refraction “n”.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates a component view of an optical router.





FIG. 2A

illustrates an alternate embodiment of an optical router.





FIG. 2B

illustrates a diagram of a component optical switch of the embodiment of FIG.


2


A.





FIG. 3A

illustrates a partial perspective view of an alternate embodiment for an optical router.





FIG. 3B

illustrates a cut away view along the line A—A of the embodiment of

FIG. 3A

showing an optical switch of the router in the “off” position.





FIG. 3C

illustrates a cut away view along the line A—A of the embodiment of

FIG. 3A

showing an optical switch of the router in the “on” position.





FIG. 4

is a diagram of the optical router and compoenents to generate optical traps of FIG.


3


A.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Particular embodiments of the invention are described below in considerable detail for the purpose of illustrating its principles and operation. However, various modifications may be made, and the scope of the invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments described below.




Certain terminology will be used in the following specification, for convenience and reference and not as a limitation, brief definitions are provided below:




A. An “evanescent wave” refers generally to a wave that occurs when a wave enters a region in which it cannot propagate. Typically such waves are characterized by an amplitude which decreases exponentially with distance into the region in which the wave cannot propagate.




B. An “optical fiber” refers generally to an elongated structure of nominally circular cross section comprised of a “core” of relatively high refractive index material surrounded by a “cladding” of lower refractive index material, adapted for transmitting an optical mode in the longitudinal direction.




C. “WDM” refers generally to wavelength division multiplexing: a system capable of simultaneously transmitting data on several wavelength channels.




D. “DWDM” refers generally to dense wavelength division multiplexing: a system capable of simultaneously transmitting data on several wavelength channels with less spacing between the channels than in a WDM system.




E. “WGM” refers generally to whispering gallery mode: a property of microspheres which allows them to form an optical conduit between optical fibers by coupling to the two optical fibers via evanescent waves.




In the preferred embodiments an optical router is formed of a series of optical switches. Common to the optical switches is the placement of a microsphere in proximity to the unclad or thinly clad regions of a pair of optical fibers. To switch the signal of a particular channel (wavelength of light) between optical fibers the WGM resonance of the microsphere for evanescent waves emanating from the electromagnetic fields associated with the signal in a particular channel is controlled either by placement of the microsphere or by altering the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere.




To form the optical router


10


illustrated in

FIG. 1

, a series of optical switches


14


,


16


and


18


are connected across a first and a second optical fiber F


1


and F


2


. The optical router


10


, by virtue of the optical switches, is capable of optically routing a number of different channels within an optical band. Each channel contains a signal comprised of a distinct wavelength of light. Hence, the quantity of optical switches within the router


10


will define the number of different channels that router


10


can switch.




Each optical switch


12


,


14


and


16


consists of a microsphere S


1


, S


2


or S


3


positioned between an electrode pair E & E′ and placed in close proximity to a region of thinned or stripped cladding


20


on each optical fiber F


1


& F


2


. Voltage is supplied to each electrode pair E & E′ via corresponding pairs of conductive leads


22


,


24


and


26


which are attached to a power supply (not shown).




The channel specific functionality of each optical switch derives from the selection of appropriately sized microspheres. Appropriate size refers to the radius of the microsphere wherein π times the radius of the microsphere is approximately an integral ½ wavelength of the wavelength of light the microsphere, with its steady state index of refraction “n” resonates for in WGM. Therefore, each microsphere by virtue of its size can be selected to correspond to a single channel carried within the optical band.




In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, the microspheres are selected with a steady state index of refraction “n” substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


. Or, stated in terms of optical switches, each microsphere is switched “on” and will operate in a WGM for an evanescent wave, emanating from an optical fiber, of a channel with a signal corresponding to the wavelength of light the given microsphere resonates for. Therefore, absent an adequate voltage across the electrodes pairs E & E′, routing of the signals from three channels, corresponding to the wavelengths of light each microsphere S


1


, S


2


and S


3


resonates for, will occur via the WGM resonance of each of the three microspheres S


1


, S


2


and S


3


.




To achieve selected routing adequate voltage across each electrode pair E & E′ should be maintained until the switching of a specific channel is desired. The effect of applying adequate voltage across the electrode pairs E & E′ is to alter the steady state index of refraction “n” of each microsphere S


1


-S


3


by polarizing the substrate forming the microspheres. The polarization will change the dielectric constant of the substrate which in turn alters the steady state index of refraction “n” making it sufficiently dissimilar from the index of refraction of the optical fibers to preclude WGM resonance and switching will not occur.




When switching of a channel is desired, the voltage across a particular electrode pair E & E′ surrounding the selected microsphere S


1


, S


2


or S


3


is briefly terminated. During that brief termination the index of refraction “n” the microsphere return to its steady state, which is substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


, thereby routing the appropriate channel.




Conversely, one may select microspheres which have a steady state index of refraction “n” substantially dissimilar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


, whereby the presence of adequate voltage across an electrode pair E & E′ alters the index of refraction “n’ of the select microsphere to become substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


, thereby routing the appropriate channel. In either case the switching “on” or “off” of the voltage across the electrodes E & E′ can be accomplished in the range of nanoseconds or even picoseconds, providing a system which can route a channel in real time. Any residual light transmission in a switched optical fiber may, as is commonly the case, be removed with an attenuator


28


.




For a given channel, adjustment of the voltage may also provide for a controllable index of refraction of “n±x,” for the microsphere, wherein as “x” approaches zero, the efficiency of the transfer of signal approaches the microsphere's maximum obtainable efficiency which may be useful for applications such as channel equalizing, grooming and power balancing.




In

FIG. 1

, for clarity, only three microspheres S


1


, S


2


& S


3


are shown and three electrode pairs


22


,


24


&


26


. However, it should be understood that a plurality of such microspheres and electrodes corresponding to the number of channels the router


10


switches can be provided. It should also be understood, that one skilled in the art may combine both the microspheres which have a steady state index of refraction “n” substantially similar to the optical fibers and those microspheres that have a steady state index of refraction “n” which is dissimilar to the optical fibers into one router without departing from the intended scope of this invention.




Illustrated in

FIGS. 2A and 2B

is another embodiment of the optical router


30


and optical switches


31


. In this embodiment a plurality of microspheres S


1


-S


7


are placed in close proximity to a first optical fiber F


1


and a second optical fiber F


2


. The cladding


32


of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


is thinned or removed at the region of close proximity


34


. Within the substrate of each microsphere is a light activated material, such as a dye, which can alter the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microspheres when adequately irradiated by an intense beam of light.




Each optical switch operates by the WGM resonance of a microsphere, which may be controlled by altering the index of refraction “n” of the microsphere, such that the evanescent waves emanating from the electromagnetic fields associated with a signal in a particular channel within one optical fiber resonates in WGM across the surface of the selected microsphere to a channel in another the optical fiber.




Depending on the selection of the light activated material and the material comprising the substrate of the microsphere, the irradiation will either change the dielectric constant of the light activated material and effect the average dielectric constant of the microsphere, or effect the dielectric constant of the light activated material and the substrate thereby altering the dielectric constant of the microsphere. In both cases the change in the dielectric constant will alter the steady state index of refraction “n” of the microsphere.




Generally, the size of each microsphere S


1


-S


7


corresponds to the wavelength of light (channel) the microsphere can effectively resonate for in WGM. Therefore, an optical router


30


with seven distinctly sized microspheres forming seven optical switches


31


can route up to seven channels. Control of the optical routing is accomplished by controlling the optical switches


31


, which in turn is accomplished by altering the steady state index of refraction “n” of a selected microsphere within a selected optical switch


31


, by either irradiation of the microsphere with an intense beam of light or by briefly terminating such irradiation.




In a “dissimilar” configuration the steady state index of refraction “n’ of the microspheres S


1


-S


7


is substantially dissimilar to the index of refraction of optical fibers F


1


& F


2


. To optically switch signal between optical fibers F


1


& F


2


, an adequately intense beam of light directed at the appropriate microsphere in the optical router


30


will alter the steady state index of refraction “n’ of the microsphere to become substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


thereby switching signal between optical fibers via WGM resonance.




In a “similar” configuration the steady state index of refraction “n’ of the microsphere is substantially similar to the index of refraction of optical fibers F


1


& F


2


. To switch signal between optical fibers F


1


& F


2


the adequately intense beam of light directed at the selected microspheres within the router


30


is terminated, thereby allowing the index of refraction “n’ of the microsphere to return to its steady state which is substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


, and switching signal between optical fibers via WGM resonance will occur.




The irradiation of the microspheres S


1


-S


7


within the optical switches


31


of the optical router


30


may be accomplished with a laser beam


36




a


&


36




b


passing through an illuminating fiber


37


. For each optical switch


31


(

FIG. 2B

) the laser beam


36




a


passes through a Mach-Zender interferometer


38


whereby the laser beam


36




a


is either intensified through constructive interference or weakened through destructive interference. Because the Mach-Zender interferometer


38


operates in a matter of a few nanoseconds or even picoseconds the adequately intense beam of light directed at a selected microsphere can occur or be terminated for a brief period of time, thereby allowing for rapid optical switching and routing. A computer


40


is used to control the Mach-Zender interferometer


38


and to select which microsphere to enable WGM resonance in. Any residual light transmission in a switched optical fiber may, as is commonly the case, be removed with an attenuator


42


.




Monitoring, equalizing, grooming and channel balancing within a given channel may be accomplished by adjusting the intensity of the laser beams


36




a


or


36




b


irradiating the microspheres to control the index of refraction of “n±x,” for the microsphere, wherein as “x” approaches zero, the efficiency of the transfer of the light within the channel approaches the microsphere's maximum obtainable efficiency




Illustrated in

FIG. 3A

is an optical router, generally designated


50


, which contains a series of optical switches


51


each operating by the movement of microspheres S


1


, S


2


or S


3


in and out of close proximity with an unclad or thinly clad region


52


of a first and second optical fiber F


1


& F


2


(FIGS.


3


B and


3


C). Each microsphere has a steady state index of refraction “n” substantially similar to the index of refraction of the unclad or thinly clad region of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


that the optical router


50


switches optical signals between.




Generally, the size of each microsphere S


1


-S


3


corresponds to the wavelength of light (channel) the microsphere can effectively resonate for in WGM. Therefore, an optical router


50


with three optical switches


51


, each with a microsphere of a different size, can route up to three channels. The movement of the a microspheres S


1


, S


2


or S


3


is controlled by containing each microsphere S


1


, S


2


or S


3


within an array of independently movable optical traps T


1


, T


2


and T


3






Optical traps are produced by the gradient forces arising form passing beamlets of light through a high numerical aperture focusing lens


52


and converging each beamlet of light. The formation of an array of independently movable optical traps capable of manipulating small particles, such as microspheres is known in the art and therefore only an overview description of such formation is provided.




To route a signal from a channel in the first optical fiber F


1


to a channel in the second optical fiber F


2


the selected optical switch


51


is activated. To activate an optical switch


51


the selected microsphere S


1


initially held remote from the unclad or thinly clad regions


53


of the first and second optical fibers F


1


& F


2


(

FIG. 3B

) is moved, with an optical trap, into close proximity (

FIG. 3C

) to the first optical fiber and second optical fiber F


1


& F


2


.




Shown in

FIG. 4

is an overview of a system to generate and control the optical traps used to conatin the dielectric microspheres S


1


-S


3


. The optical traps T


1


-T


3


(

FIG. 3A

) are formed by passing a collimated light, preferably a laser beam, produced by a laser


62


at area ‘a’ of a beam altering optical element


63


. The beam altering optical element diffracts the laser beam


61


into a pluarality of beamlets


64


each beamlet passing through area “b” at the back aperture


65


of the focusing lens


52


and coantining a microsphere S


1


-S


3


.




Any suitable laser can be used as the source of the laser beam


62


. Useful lasers include solid state lasers, diode pumped laser, gas lasers, dye lasers, alexanderite lasers, free electron lasers, VCSEL lasers, diode lasers, Ti-Sapphire lasers, doped YAG lasers, doped YLF lasers, diode pumped YAG lasers and, flash lamp-pumped YAG lasers. Diode-pumped Nd:YAG lasers operating between 10 mW and 5 W are preferred.




When the laser beam


61


is directed at the beam altering optical element


63


, the beam altering optical element produces the plurality of beamlets


64


by altering phase profile of the laser beam


61


. Depending on the number and type of optical traps desired, the alteration may include diffraction, wavefront shaping, phase shifting, steering, diverging and converging.




Suitable beam altering optical elements are characterized as transmissive or reflective depending on how they direct the focused beam of light or energy. Transmissive diffractive optical elements focus the beam of light or energy, while reflective diffractive optical elements reflect the beam.




A beam altering optical element can also be categorized as being static or dynamic. Examples of suitable static beam altering optical elements include those with one or more fixed surface regions, such as gratings, holograms, stencils, light shaping holographic filters, polychromatic holograms, lenses, mirrors, prisms, waveplates and the like.




Examples of suitable dynamic beam altering optical elements having a time dependent aspect to their function include computer generated diffractive patterns, phase shifting materials, liquid crystal phase shifting arrays, micro-mirror arrays, piston mode micro-mirror arrays, spatial light modulators, electro-optic deflectors, accousto-optic modulators, deformable mirrors, reflective MEMS arrays and the like. With a dynamic beam altering optical element, the media which comprises the beam altering optical element can be altered, to change the phase pattern imparted to the focused beam of light which results in a corresponding change in the phase profile of the focused beam of light, such as diffraction, or convergence. The beam altering optical element is also useful to impart a particular topological mode to the laser light. Accordingly, one beamlet may be formed in a Guass-Laguerre mode while another beamlet formed in a Guassian mode.




Preferred dynamic optical elements include phase-only spatial light modulators such as the “PAL-SLM series X7665”, manufactured by Hamamatsu, of Japan or the “SLM 512SA7,” manufactured by Boulder Nonlinear Systems of Layafette Colo. These beam altering optical elements are computer


65


controlled to generate the optical traps T


1


-T


3


.




Because the steady state index of refraction “n” of each microsphere S


1


-S


3


corresponds to the index of refraction of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


optical switching will occur when the selected microsphere S


1


is moved close enough to the unclad or thinly clad regions


52


of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


. At some distance from the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


the evanescent wave, associated with the signal of the selected channel, will cross the surface of the selected microsphere S


1


, via WGM resonance, and switch signal between optical fibers F


1


& F


2


. When the switching is completed the optical trap is quickly withdrawn and the microsphere S


1


ceases to switch signal.




By adjusting the distance the microsphere S


1


from the unclad or thinly region


52


of the optical fibers F


1


& F


2


a controllable index of refraction of “n±x” for the microsphere may be obtained, wherein as “x” approaches zero the efficiency of the transfer of signal approaches the microsphere's maximum obtainable efficiency which may be useful for applications such as channel equalizing, grooming and power balancing.




Since certain changes may be made in the above systems apparatus and methods without departing from the scope of the invention herein involved, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description, as shown in the accompanying drawing, the specification, and the claims shall be interpreted in an illustrative, and not a limiting sense.



Claims
  • 1. A method of optical switching a signal between optical fibers the method comprising:providing a first optical fiber with an unclad or thinly clad region; providing a second optical fiber with an unclad or thinly clad region; placing a dielectric microsphere capable of WGM resonance for a specific wavelength of light with a voltage alterable steady state index of refraction “n” substantially similar to the index of refraction of the optical fibers, in close proximity with the unclad or thinly clad regions of the first and second optical fibers; placing a pair of electrodes on either side of the dielectric microsphere; passing voltage adequate to alter the steady state index of refraction “n” of the dielectric microsphere through the pair of electrodes; providing the specific wavelength of light as a signal within the first optical fiber; briefly terminating the voltage whereby the index of refraction “n” of the dielectric microsphere returns to its steady state; switching the signal from the first optical fiber across the dielectric microsphere to the second optical fiber; and, reapplying the voltage.
Parent Case Info

This application is a Continuation Application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/886,698, filed Jun. 20, 2001 now abandoned, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference to the extent allowed by law.

US Referenced Citations (55)
Number Name Date Kind
3407294 Hill Oct 1968 A
3589794 Marcatili Jun 1971 A
3710279 Ashkin Jan 1973 A
3793541 Ashkin et al. Feb 1974 A
3808432 Ashkin Apr 1974 A
3808550 Ashkin Apr 1974 A
4127329 Chang et al. Nov 1978 A
4627689 Asher Dec 1986 A
4720160 Hicks, Jr. Jan 1988 A
4827125 Goldstein May 1989 A
4887721 Martin et al. Dec 1989 A
4893886 Ashkin et al. Jan 1990 A
5029791 Ceccon et al. Jul 1991 A
5079169 Chu et al. Jan 1992 A
5113286 Morrison May 1992 A
5170890 Wilson et al. Dec 1992 A
5198369 Itoh et al. Mar 1993 A
5212382 Sasaki et al. May 1993 A
5231533 Gonokami et al. Jul 1993 A
5245466 Burns et al. Sep 1993 A
5327515 Anderson et al. Jul 1994 A
5343038 Nishiwaki et al. Aug 1994 A
5355252 Haraguchi Oct 1994 A
5363190 Inaba et al. Nov 1994 A
5364744 Buican et al. Nov 1994 A
5374556 Bennett et al. Dec 1994 A
5445011 Ghislain et al. Aug 1995 A
5452123 Asher et al. Sep 1995 A
5473471 Yamagata et al. Dec 1995 A
5506712 Sasayama et al. Apr 1996 A
5512745 Finer et al. Apr 1996 A
5629802 Clark May 1997 A
5685636 German Nov 1997 A
5689109 Schutze Nov 1997 A
5729643 Hmelar et al. Mar 1998 A
5752606 Wilson et al. May 1998 A
5776674 Wilmer Jul 1998 A
5875272 Kewitsch et al. Feb 1999 A
5926496 Ho et al. Jul 1999 A
5935507 Morito et al. Aug 1999 A
5939716 Neal Aug 1999 A
5952651 Morito et al. Sep 1999 A
5953166 Shikano Sep 1999 A
6007218 German et al. Dec 1999 A
6009115 Ho Dec 1999 A
6052495 Little et al. Apr 2000 A
6067859 Kas et al. May 2000 A
6101300 Fan et al. Aug 2000 A
6108121 Mansell et al. Aug 2000 A
6115519 Espindola et al. Sep 2000 A
6139831 Shivashankar et al. Oct 2000 A
6142650 Brown et al. Nov 2000 A
6154591 Kershaw Nov 2000 A
6180940 Galstian Jan 2001 B1
6190022 Tocci et al. Feb 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
05-88107 Apr 1993 JP
03248946 Apr 1993 JP
409089780 Apr 1997 JP
WO 9817044 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9853535 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9939223 May 1999 WO
WO 0029886 May 2000 WO
WO 0035057 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0159497 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0163707 Aug 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (66)
Entry
Cai et al. (Optics letters, vol. 25, No. 4, Feb. 15, 2000, pp. 260-162).*
Ming et al. (IEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 6, Jun. 1999).*
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/038,651, Maleki et al., filed Nov. 8, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/004,411, Yariv, filed Jun. 21, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/018,611, Maleki et al., filed Feb. 14, 2002.
Holtz, J. H. and Asher, S. A., “Polymerized Colloidal Crystal Hydrogel Films as Intelligent Chemical Sensing Materials”, Nature, vol. 389, pp. 829-832, Oct. 23, 1997.
Ashkin, A., “Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Particles Using Lasers”, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 94, pp. 4853-4860, May 1997.
Ballman, E. and Axner, O., “Design for Fully Steerable Dual-Trap Optical Tweezers”, Applied Optics, vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 2107-2113, Apr. 1, 1997.
van Blaaderen, A. et al., “Template-Directed Colloidal Crystallization”, Nature, vol. 385, pp. 321-324, Jan. 23, 1997.
Chiou, A.E. et al., “Interferometric Optical Tweezers”, Optics Communications, 133, pp. 7-10, Jan. 1, 1997.
Visscher, K. et al., “Construction of Multiple-Beam Optical Traps with Nanometer-Resolution Position Sensing”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1066-1075, Dec. 1996.
Suzuki, A. et al., “Optical Switching in Polymer Gels”, J. Appl. Phys. 80(1), pp. 131-136, Jul. 1, 1996.
Suzuki, A. et al., “Hysteretic Behavior and Irreversibility of Polymer Gels by pH Range”, J. Chem. Phys. 103/911), pp. 4706-4710, Sep. 15, 1995.
Xiang, X. D. et al., “A Combinatorial Approach to Materials Discovery”, Science, vol. 268, pp. 1738-1740, Jun. 23, 1995.
Murray, C A and Grier, D G, “Colloidal Crystals”, American Scientist, vol. 83, pp. 238-245, May-Jun. 1995.
Mason, T G and Weitz, D A, “Optical Measurements of Frequency-Dependent Linear Viscoelastic Modula of Complex Fluids” Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, No. 7, pp. 1250-1253, Feb. 13, 1995.
Crocker, J C and Grier, D G, “Microscopic Measurement of the Pair Interaction Potential of Charge-Stabilized Colloid”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 352-355, Jul. 11, 1994.
Sasaki, K. et al., “Optical Micromanipulation of a Lasing Polymer Particle in Water”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 32, Part 2, No. 8B, pp. 1. 1144-1. 1147, Aug. 15, 1993.
Afzal, R.S. and Treacy, F.B., “Optical Tweezers Using a Diode Laser”, Rev. Sci. Instrum 63(4), pp. 2157-2163, Apr. 1992.
Ashkin, A., “Forces of a Single Beam Gradient Laser Trap on a Dielectric Sphere in the Ray Optics Regime”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 61, pp. 569-582, Feb. 1992.
Misawa, H. et al., “Multibeam Laser Manipulation and Fixation of Microparticles”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 310-312, Jan. 20, 1992.
Sasaki, K. et al., “Pattern Formation and Flow Control of Fine Particles by Laser-Scanning Micromanipulation”, Optics Letters, vol. 16, No. 19, pp. 1463-1465, Oct. 1, 1991.
Sasaki, K. et al., “Laser-Scanning Micromanipulation and Spatial Patterning of Fine Particles”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 31, No. 5B, pp. 1. 907-1. 909, May 1991.
Misawa, H. et al., “Spatial Pattern Formation Size Selection, and Directional Flow of Polymer Latex Particles by Laser Trapping Technique”, Chemistry Letters, 469-472, 1991.
Burns, M M et al., “Optical Matter: Crystallization and Binding in Intense Optical Fields”, Science, vol. 249, pp. 749-754, Aug. 17, 1990.
Burns, M M et al., “Optical Binding”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 63, No. 12, pp. 1233-1236, Sep. 18, 1989.
Ashkin, A., et al., “Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Single Cells Using Infrared Laser Beams”, Nature, vol. 330, pp. 769-771, Dec. 24-31, 1987.
Ashkin, A., et al., “Observation of a Single-Beam Gradient Force Optical Trap for Dielectric Particles”, Optics Letters, vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 288-290, May 1986.
Chowdhury, A. et al., “Laser-Induced Freezing”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 833-836, Aug. 19, 1985.
Fournier, J.M.R. et al., “Writing Diffractive Structures by Optical Trapping”, SPIE, vol. 2406, pp. 101-111.
Grier, D. G. and Korda, P T., “Lateral Deflection of Flowing Particles by a Static Array of Optical Tweezers”, Dept. of Physics, James Franck Institute and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, U. of Chicago, Aug. 6, 2001.
Sun, Chi-Kuang et al., “Cell manipulation by use of diamond microparticles as handles of optical tweezers”, J Opt Soc Am B. vol. 18, No. 10, pp. 1483-1489, Oct. 2001.
Liesener, J. et al. “Multi-functional optical tweezers using computer-generated holograms”, J. Optics Communications, 185(2000), pp. 77-82.
Mogensen, P C et al., “Dynamic array generation and pattern formation for optical tweezers”, J Optics Communications, 175(2000), pp. 75-81.
Dufresne, E.R and Grier, D G “Optical tweezer arrays and optical substrates created with diffractive optics”, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 69, No. 5, pp. 1974-1977, May 1998.
Dufresne, E.R et al., “Computer-generated holographic optical tweezer arrays”, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 1810-1816, Mar. 2001.
Korda, P. et al., “Nanofabrication with Holographic Optical Tweezers”—http://griergroup.uchicago.edu/≈grier/fillingb/.
Module Laser Tweezers®1064/1500, PN 80500025 Rev. A. Cell Robotics, Inc., 2715 Broadbent Pkwy NE., Albuquerque, NM 87107.
Paterson, I., et al., “Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles”, Science May 4, 2001, 292(5518):912-4, Abstract.
Svoboda, K. et al., Direct Observation of Kinesin Stepping by Optical Trapping Interferometry, Nature, 365, 721-7, 1993.
Finer, J.T. et al., “Single Myosin Molecule Mechanics Piconewton Forces and Nanometre Steps”, Nature 368 113-9, 1994.
Vergel, C. et al., “The Stiffness of Rabbit Skeletal Actomyosin Cross-Bridges Determined with an Optical Tweezers Transducer”, Biophysical Journal 75:1424-1438, 1998.
Block, S.M., “Making light work with optical tweezers”, Nature 360:493-495 (1992).
Schnelle, T. et al., “Trapping in AC octode field cages”, J. Electrostat 50(1) Sep. 17-29, 2000.
Greulich, K O et al., “Manipulation by laser microbeam and optical tweezers from plant cells to single molecules”, J. Microscopy, vol. 198 182-187 Part 3, Jun. 2000.
Green, N G and Morgan, H., “Dielectrophoretic separation of nano-particles”, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 30(11) 1.41-1.44, Jun. 7, 1997.
He, H. et al., “Optical particle trapping with higher-order doughnut beams produced using high efficiency computer generated holograms”, J Mod Opt 42:217-223, 1995.
Gahagan, K.T. et al., “Optical vortex trapping of particles”, Opt Lett 21 827-829, 1996.
Friese, J F J, et al., “Optical angular-momentum transfer to trapped absorbing particles”, Phys Rev A 54 1593-1596, 1996.
Arryx BioRyx™ 200 System, Revolutionary Technology enabling breakthrough research, Arryx, Inc 316 North Michigan Avenue, Suite C1.20. Chicago, IL 60601-3712.
Tatum, Christine, Guiding light gains firm grip, Business Technology, Chicago Tribune, Section 4, Monday, Feb. 5, 2001.
“Laser Tweezers Transport Cell-Size Liposomes”, Photonics Technology News, Apr. 2002, http://www.phototonics.com/Spectra/Tech/apr02/techTweezers.asp.
Shaw, R.W. et al., “Time-domain observation of optical pulse propagation in whispering-gallery modes of glass spheres”, Optics Letters, 23, p. 1301, (1998).
Cai, M. et al., “Highly efficient optial power transfer to whispering-gallery modes by use of a symmetrical dual-coupling configuration”, Optics Letters, 25, p. 260, (2000).
Knight, J.C. et al., “Phase-matched excitation of whispering-gallery-mode resonances by a fiber taper”, Optics Letters, 22, p. 1129, (1997).
Gorodetsky, M.L. et al., “Ultimate Q of optical microsphere resonators”, Optics Letters, 21, p. 453, (1996).
Maleki, I. et al., “Whispering-gallery-mode microspheres as light modulators”, NASA Tech. Brief, 25, No. 11 from JPI, New Technology Report NPO-20664, Nov. 2000.
Cai, M. et al., “Highly efficient hybrid fiber taper coupled microsphere laser”, in OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics (TOPS) vol. 56 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO 2001), Technical Digest, Postconference Edition (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C. 2001), pp. 114-116.
Cai, M. et al., “Fiber-Optic Add-Crop Device Based on a Silica Microsphere-Whispering Gallery Mode System”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 11, p. 686, (1999).
“Whispering-Gallery-Mode Microspheres as Light Modulators”, http://www.nasatech.com/Briefs/Nov00/NPO20664.html.
Owrutskyk, J C et al., “Optical properties and dynamics of a photochromic bisthienylethene in solution and in a polymer film”, Chemical Physics Letters, 293, pp. 555-563, 1998.
Cai, M et al., “Observation of Critical Coupling in a Fiber Taper to a Silica-Microsphere Whispering-Gallery Mode System”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 74-77, Jul. 3, 2000.
Ogura, Y. et al., “Optical manipulation of microscopic objects by means of vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser array sources”, Applied Optics, vol. 40, No. 30, pp. 5430-5435, Oct. 20, 2001.
“Simple Fiber-Optic Coupling for Microsphere Resonators”, http://www.nasatech.com/Briefs/May01/NPO20619.html.
“Highly Efficient Coupling in a Fiber Taper to a Silica Microsphere Whispering-Gallery-Mode System”.
Kilper, D.C. et al., “Optical Feedback and Coupling Characteristics of Microsphere Resonators” Opto Southeast, Sep. 2000.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/886698 Jun 2001 US
Child 10/394172 US