The aspect of the embodiments relates to an optical system and an apparatus having the optical system, and is suitable for an imaging apparatus using an image sensor, such as a video camera, an electronic still camera, a broadcast camera, and a monitoring camera.
Capturing an image while focusing on an object plane inclined with respect to a direction perpendicular to an optical axis is referred to as tilt image-capturing.
In the tilt image-capturing, inclining an object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent is demanded in order to broaden the range of image expressions.
As an optical system that implements this image-capturing, an imaging optical system having a tilt mechanism (a tilt-shift mechanism) is known.
Meanwhile, in the imaging optical system having the tilt mechanism, a composition can shift during tilt (hereinafter, such a shift is also referred to as “composition shift”), which impairs convenience.
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2019-090952 discusses an imaging optical system provided with a plurality of lens units that moves in a direction perpendicular to an optical axis direction. In Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2019-090952, a lens unit A moves in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction, and a lens unit B moves in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction to correct a shift effect occurring in the lens unit A, during tilt image-capturing, so that tilt image-capturing with a small composition shift is performable.
The imaging optical system of Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2019-090952 moves the lens unit in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction during tilt image-capturing, and thus aberration due to optical decentering occurs. The amount of this aberration occurring due to the decentering increases, as the inclination amount of an object plane for performing tilt image-capturing increases. In Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2019-090952, the lens unit A that moves in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction has a negative refractive power, and thus the height from the optical axis of off-axis light to be incident on the lens unit B increases, and the amount of the decentering aberration occurring when the lens unit B is decentered increases. The height of the off-axis light from the optical axis increases, so that the diameter of the lens unit B increases. This makes it difficult to increase the decentering amount of the lens unit B, and as a result, it is difficult to incline an object plane on which focus is achieved.
According to an aspect of the embodiments, an optical system configured to perform tilt image-capturing includes an object-side lens unit, a first lens unit having a positive refractive power, a second lens unit having a positive refractive power, and a third lens unit having a negative refractive power which are arranged in order from an object side. The first lens unit and the third lens unit move in a direction including a component of a direction perpendicular to an optical axis for tilt image-capturing. The object-side lens unit and the second lens unit do not move in a direction including a component of a direction perpendicular to the optical axis for tilt image-capturing.
Further features of the disclosure will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
Examples of the aspect of the embodiments will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In each of lens section diagrams, the left side is the object side (front) and the right side is the image side (rear). An optical system of each of Examples has a plurality of lens units.
A lens unit in the specification of the present application is a group of lenses which are decentered with respect to an optical axis at the time of tilt image-capturing, or a group of fixed lenses. The lens unit may consist of a single lens, or consist of a plurality of lenses. The lens unit may also include an aperture diaphragm.
IP represents an image plane. When the optical system of each of the Examples is used as an image-capturing optical system of a digital still camera or a digital video camera, an imaging plane of a solid-state image sensor (photoelectric conversion element), such as a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor and a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensor, is disposed as the image plane IP. When the optical system of each of the Examples is used as an image-capturing optical system of a silver-halide film camera, a photosensitive surface corresponding to a film surface is disposed as the image plane IP.
In a spherical aberration diagram, a solid line indicates a d-line (wavelength 587.6 nm), and a two-dot chain line indicates a g-line (wavelength 435.8 nm). In an astigmatism diagram, a broken line M indicates a meridional image plane, and a solid line S indicates a sagittal image plane. A distortion aberration diagram indicates a distortion amount with respect to the d-line. A magnification chromatic aberration is represented by the g-line. Further, an image pickup half angle of view (degree) is denoted by ω, and an F-number is denoted by Fno.
In each of the transverse aberration diagrams, a broken line M indicates a meridional image plane, and a solid line S indicates a sagittal image plane.
Capturing an image with an object plane inclined with respect to the direction perpendicular to the optical axis being focused on is referred to as tilt image-capturing.
Next, the principle of the tilt image-capturing in the optical system in each of Examples will be described.
As a technique of correcting this image plane inclination at the angle θimg caused by the object plane inclination at the angle θobj (hereinafter, such an image plane inclination is referred to as the image plane tilt), the decentering of the lens is used. Decentering the lens tilts the mage plane in the optical axis direction, so that favorable focus can be achieved with respect to the inclined object plane, based on the Scheimpflug principal (
To address this, in the optical system in each of Examples, the entire system is small, and a first lens unit and a third lens unit each having a component that moves in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis from an infinite object to a near object are disposed to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent. Further, a second lens unit that does not move in a direction including a component of a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, for tilt image-capturing, is disposed between the first lens unit and the third lens unit. Moving a part of the optical system makes it easy to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent while reducing a composition shift, despite the entire system being small.
Next, a characteristic configuration in the optical system of each of Examples will be described.
The optical system of each of Examples is capable of performing tilt image-capturing, and has an object-side lens unit LF, a first lens unit La having positive refractive power, a second lens unit Lb having positive refractive power, and a third lens unit Lc having negative refractive power, which are arranged in order from the object side. The first lens unit La and the third lens unit Lc each move in a direction including a component of a direction perpendicular to the optical axis in tilt image-capturing, and the second lens unit Lb does not move in a direction including a component of a direction perpendicular to the optical axis for tilt image-capturing.
The first lens unit La and the third lens unit Lc are moved in tilt image-capturing, so that the size is reduced in comparison with a configuration in which the entire optical system is inclined. Further, the correction of the composition shift is enabled, which facilitates the tilt image-capturing having a small composition change, in comparison with a configuration in which tilt image-capturing is performed with a single lens unit. Furthermore, the two lens units are moved, so that it is easy to correct various aberrations, such as coma aberration and magnification chromatic aberration, due to decentering.
Further, the second lens unit Lb that does not move in the direction including the component of the direction perpendicular to the optical axis for tilt image-capturing is disposed between the first lens unit La and the third lens unit Lc. This enables the control of a light ray to be incident on the third lens unit Lc with a plurality of lens units, so that various aberrations, such as coma aberration and magnification chromatic aberration, due to decentering are suitably correctable. The second lens unit Lb is configured so as not to move at the time of tilt image-capturing, so that a mechanical system in decentering lenses simplified, thus reducing manufacture variations, while performance is increased.
Furthermore, the object-side lens unit LF does not move in a direction including a component of a direction perpendicular to the optical axis for tilt image-capturing. The lens unit that is disposed closest to the object in the optical system tends to be large in the radial direction, and the size is increased if a mechanical system for decentering the lenses is disposed. Thus, fixing the lens unit during tilt image-capturing controls an increase in size controlled by.
Further, the first lens unit La has the positive refractive power, the second lens unit Lb has the positive refractive power, and the third lens unit Lc has the negative refractive power. The first lens unit La and the second lens unit Lb each have the positive refractive power, so that a height from the optical axis of an off-axis ray to be incident on the third lens unit Lc is reduced and that the third lens unit Lc is downsized. Furthermore, various aberrations occurring when the third lens unit Lc is decentered can be reduced by decreasing the height of the off-axis ray to be incident on the third lens unit Lc.
Further, the third lens unit Lc moves the front principal point of the entire optical system L0 toward the object by having the negative refractive power, so that the entire optical system L0 is downsized.
Furthermore, in the optical system of each of Examples, one or more of the following inequalities are satisfied.
Ma
max
/Mc
max>0 (1)
0.05<fa/f<2.00 (2)
−2.00<fc/f<−0.05 (3)
0.4<|Pa|+|Pc|<12.0 (4)
0<Lbk/f<0.65 (5)
0.5<f/fb<10.0 (6)
β<−0.25 (7)
0.01<|Mamax/fa|<0.30 (8)
0.01<|Mcmax/fc|<0.30 (9)
−0.8<(Rfa+Rra)/(Rra−Rfa)<0.8 (10)
−0.8<(Rfc+Rrc)/(Rrc−Rfc)<0.8 (11)
−3.00<mLf2/mLf1<−0.10 (12)
In the above inequalities, a maximum movement amount of the first lens unit La in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis is denoted by Mamax, and a maximum movement amount of the third lens unit Lc in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis is denoted by Mcmax. Herein, the maximum movement amount is to difference between the surface vertex and the optical axis in the radial direction when the lens unit has been moved for tilt image-capturing, in comparison with a state where tilt image-capturing is not performed, and the direction in which the first lens unit La moves is positive, whereas the direction opposite to the direction in which the first lens unit La moves is negative. In a case where the movement amount varies depending on each surface vertex, the largest movement amount among the movement amounts of the respective surface vertexes is regarded as the maximum movement amount.
In the above inequalities, the focal length of the first lens unit La is denoted by fa, and the focal length of the third lens unit Lc is denoted by fc. The Petzval sum of the first lens unit La is denoted by Pa, and the Petzval sum of the third lens unit Lc is denoted by Pc. The focal length of the entire optical system L0 is denoted by f, and the back focus of the optical system L0 is denoted by Lbk. The focal length of the second lens unit Lb is denoted by fb. The lateral magnification at the time of closest focus of the optical system L0 is denoted by β. The paraxial curvature radius of the object-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the object in the first lens unit La is denoted by Rfa, and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the image plane in the first lens unit La is denoted by Rra.
The paraxial curvature radius of the object-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the object in the third lens unit Lc is denoted by Rfc, and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the image plane in the third lens unit Lc is denoted by Rrc. The movement amount of a first focusing unit Lf1, in the object-side lens unit LF, in focusing from the infinite distance to the closest distance is denoted by mLf1. The movement amount of a second focusing unit Lf2, disposed on the image side of the first focusing unit Lf1, in focusing from the infinite distance to the closest distance is denoted by mLf2. Here, the movement amount in focusing in the case of movement from the image side to the object side is positive, and is negative in the case of movement from the object side to the image side.
Next, the technical meaning of each of the above-described inequalities will be described.
The inequality (1) expresses the ratio between the movement amount of the first lens unit La in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis resulting from the decentering and the movement amount of the third lens unit Lc in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis resulting from the decentering. In a case where the inequality (1) is satisfied, the directions of the composition shifts due to the decentering of the respective lens units are opposite directions, and thus have a relationship of cancelling out each other's composition shift. In other words, the composition shifts are reduced. In a case where the moving directions are reversed, the composition shifts increase, and thus such a configuration is not desirable.
The inequality (2) defines the ratio of the focal length of the first lens unit La to the focal length of the entire optical system L0. In a case where fa/f falls below the lower limit, a decentering aberration amount per unit decentering amount increases, which makes it difficult to maintain favorable optical performance at the time of tilt image-capturing. In a case where fa/f exceeds the upper limit, a large decentering amount is to be used to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent, which is accompanied by an increase in the lens diameter of the first lens unit La, so that the size increases.
The inequality (3) defines the ratio of the focal length of the third lens unit Lc to the focal length of the entire optical system LO. In a case where fc/f falls below the lower limit, a large decentering amount is to be used to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent, which is accompanied by an increase in the lens diameter of the third lens unit Lc, so that the size increases. In a case where fc/f exceeds the upper limit, the decentering aberration amount per unit decentering amount increases, which makes it difficult to maintain favorable optical performance at the time of tilt image-capturing, and thus such a configuration is not desirable.
The inequality (4) defines the sum of the Petzval sum of the first lens unit La and the Petzval sum of the third lens unit Lc. In a case where |Pa|+|Pc|falls below the lower limit, a large decentering amount is to be used to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent at the time of tilt image-capturing, which is accompanied by an increase in the lens diameter of the decentered lens unit, and thus the size of the optical system increases. In a case where |Pa|+|Pc| exceeds the upper limit, the decentering aberration amount per unit decentering amount increases, which makes it difficult to maintain favorable optical performance at the time of tilt image-capturing.
The Petzval sum of the inequality (4) is defined by the following equation.
The inequality (5) defines the ratio of the back focus to the focal length of the entire optical system L0. In a case where Lbk/f exceeds the upper limit, the overall lens length increases, and thus such a configuration is not desirable. In a case where Lbk/f exceeds the lower limit, the lens comes into contact with the image sensor, and thus such a configuration is not desirable. The lenses are each disposed at a position at which the height of the off-axis ray from the optical axis is large so as to satisfy the inequality (5), which makes it easy to correct the field curvature, so that favorable optical performance can be achieved.
The inequality (6) defines the ratio of the focal length of the entire optical system LO to the focal length of the second lens unit Lb. In a case where f/fb falls below the lower limit, the refractive power of the second lens unit Lb becomes too weak, which makes it difficult to reduce the height of the off-axis ray to be incident on the third lens unit Lc, so that the size of the third lens unit Lc increases, which is not desirable. In a case where f/fb exceeds the upper limit, the refractive power of the second lens unit Lb becomes too strong, which makes it difficult to correct various aberrations occurring in the second lens unit Lb.
The inequality (7) relates to the magnification of the optical system L0. In a case where the upper limit of this inequality is exceeded, sufficient photographing magnification is not obtained, which makes it difficult to perform short distance image-capturing, which is not desirable.
The inequality (8) defines the ratio between the focal length of the first lens unit La and the maximum movement amount in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the first lens unit La. In a case where |Mamax/fa| falls below the lower limit, the movement amount with respect to the optical axis of the first lens unit La is small, which makes it difficult to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent. In case where |Mamax/fa| exceeds the upper limit, the refractive power of the first lens unit La increases, and the decentering aberration amount per unit decentering amount also increases, which makes it difficult to maintain favorable optical performance at the time of tilt image-capturing.
The inequality (9) defines the ratio between the focal length of the third lens unit Lc and the maximum movement amount in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the third lens unit Lc. In a case where |Mcmax/fc| falls below the lower limit, the movement amount with respect to the optical axis of the third lens unit Lc decreases, so that a sufficient image plane tilt amount cannot be obtained at the time of tilt image-capturing, which makes it difficult to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent. In a case where |Mcmax/fc| exceeds the upper limit, the refractive power of the third lens unit Lc increases, and the decentering aberration amount per unit decentering amount also increases, which makes it difficult to maintain favorable optical performance at the time of tilt image-capturing.
The inequality (10) defines the shape factor of the object-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the object in the first lens unit La, and the image-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the image plane in the first lens unit La. When (Rfa+Rra)/(Rra−Rfa) exceeds the upper limit or falls below the lower limit, and the first lens unit La becomes closer to a meniscus shape, the refractive power of the first lens unit La decreases, and the image plane tilt amount also decreases, so that it is difficult to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent.
The inequality (11) defines the shape factor of the object-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the object in the third lens unit Lc, and the image-side lens surface of the lens disposed closest to the image plane in the third lens unit Lc. When (Rfc+Rrc)/(Rrc−Rfc) exceeds the upper limit or falls below the lower limit, and the third lens unit Lc becomes closer to a meniscus shape, the refractive power of the third lens unit Lc decreases, and the image plane tilt amount also decreases, so that it is difficult to incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent.
The inequality (12) defines the ratio between the movement amount of the first focusing unit Lf1 in focusing and the movement amount of the second focusing unit Lf2, disposed on the image plane side of the first focusing unit Lf1, in focusing. The first focusing unit Lf1 and the second focusing unit Lf2 move in opposite directions from the infinite distance to the closest distance, so that it is easy to reduce fluctuations in various aberrations accompanied by object distance fluctuations. If mLf2/mLf1 exceeds the upper limit, the movement amount of the second focusing unit Lf2 decreases, which makes it difficult to correct, in particular, the field curvature aberration. If mLf2/mLf1 falls below the lower limit, the movement amount of the first focusing unit Lf1 decreases, which makes it difficult to correct, in particular, the spherical aberration.
In one embodiment, the optical system of each of Examples, the inequalities (1) to (12) may be set as follows.
0.30<Mamax/Mcmax<3.00 (1a)
0.10<fa/f<1.50 (2a)
−1.50<fc/f<−0.10 (3a)
0.8<|Pa|+|Pc|<10.0 (4a)
0.05<Lbk/f<0.50 (5a)
1.0<f/fb<9.0 (6a)
−2.5<β<−0.3 (7a)
0.02<|Mamax/fa|<0.25 (8a)
0.02<|Mcmax/fc|<0.27 (9a)
−0.7<(Rfa+Rra)/(Rra−Rfa)<0.7 (10a)
−0.75<(Rfb+Rrb)/(Rrb−Rfb)<0.75 (11a)
−2.50<mLf2/mLf1<−0.20 (12a)
In another embodiment, the optical system of each of Examples, the numerical value range of each of the inequalities (la) to (12a) may be set as follows.
0.60<Mamax/Mcmax<2.50 (1b)
0.15<fa/f<1.20 (2b)
−1.20<fc/f<−0.15 (3b)
1.2<|Pa|+|Pc|<8.0 (4b)
0.07<Lbk/f<0.40 (5b)
1.5<f/fb<8.0 (6b)
−1.5<f3<−0.32 (7b)
0.03<|Mamax/fa|<0.20 (8b)
0.05<|Mcmax/fc|<0.25 (9b)
−0.6<(Rfa+Rra)/(Rra−Rfa)<0.6 (10b)
−0.7<(Rfb+Rrb)/(Rrb−Rfb)<0.7 (11b)
−2.00<mLf2/mLf1<−0.25 (12b)
In one embodiment, the object-side lens unit LF have positive refractive power. The object-side lens unit LF having the positive refractive power enables the on-axis light ray to converge, so that the diameter of the lens unit that is moved in decentering can be reduced.
In one embodiment, the object-side lens unit LF have the first focusing unit Lf1 that moves in the optical axis direction for focusing. Disposing the first focusing unit Lf1 at a position at which the on-axis light ray is relatively large increases the movement amount of the image plane in the optical axis direction with respect to the movement amount per unit when the first focusing unit Lf1 has moved for focusing. Therefore, the movement amount of the first focusing unit Lf1 from the infinite distance to the closest distance can be reduced, and an extra space is therefore unnecessary, thus downsizing the entire system.
Further, in one embodiment, the second focusing unit Lf2 moves for focusing and is disposed closer to the image plane than the first focusing unit Lf1. The plurality of focusing units are moved for focusing, so that it is easy to correct aberrations due to object distance fluctuations, thus enhancing the performance for short distance.
In each Example, each element is specified as described above, thus realizing the optical system that can incline the object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent while reducing the composition shift, despite the entire system being small.
Next, the lens configuration of each of the Examples will be described in detail.
The optical system LO of Example 1 is composed of the object-side lens unit LF, the first focusing unit Lf1, the second focusing unit Lf2, the first lens unit La, the second lens unit Lb, the third lens unit Lc, and an image-side lens unit LR, which are arranged in order from the object side. The image-side lens unit LR is disposed closer to the image plane than the third lens unit Lc. Thus, the image-side lens unit LR can be disposed at a position at which the off-axis ray is high, so that the field curvature is well corrected. The first focusing unit Lf1 and the second focusing unit Lf2 are disposed at positions close to the diaphragm. Thus, the first focusing unit Lf1 and the second focusing unit Lf2 are disposed at positions at which the off-axis ray is low, so that the diameter of each of the first focusing unit Lf1 and the second focusing unit Lf2 is made small.
In the optical system LO of Example 2, the first lens unit La and the third lens unit Lc each consist of two lens including a positive lens and a negative lens. This further controls the occurrence of the chromatic aberration, even in a case where the first lens unit La and the third lens unit Lc are decentered at the time of tilt image-capturing.
In the optical system LO of Example 3, the first focusing unit Lf1 is moved for focusing. The configuration in which a single lens unit is moved for focusing leads to reduction in variations at the time of manufacture, thus achieving higher performance. A negative lens that does not move for focusing and does not move for tilt image-capturing either is disposed between the first focusing unit Lf1 and the first lens unit La. This makes it easy to control the light ray to be incident on the first lens unit La from the object side, and higher performance is achieved for tilt image-capturing.
In the optical system L0 of Example 4, the second focusing unit Lf2 is disposed in the image-side lens unit LR.
Thus, the second focusing unit Lf2 is disposed at a position at which the off-axis ray is high, so that an off-axis aberration, such as the field curvature aberration, that occurs when the object distance fluctuates is well corrected.
In the optical system LO of Example 5, the first focusing unit Lf1 and the second focusing unit Lf2 each have a cemented lens consisting of a positive lens and a negative lens. This reduces fluctuations in the chromatic aberration that occur in focusing from the infinite distance to the closest distance.
In the optical system LO of Example 6, a cemented lens that consists of a negative lens and a positive lens, does not move for focusing, and does not move for tilt image-capturing either is disposed between the first focusing unit Lf1 and the first lens unit La. This reduces the chromatic aberration related to decentering occurring for tilt image-capturing, so that higher performance is achieved for tilt image-capturing.
In the optical system L0 of Example 7, the first focusing unit Lf1 is the unit that is moved for focusing, and is disposed in the image-side lens unit LR. The first focusing unit Lf1 is disposed in the image-side lens unit LR so that the les unit that is moved for focusing (the first focusing unit Lf1) is at a position at which the on-axis light ray is relatively small. Thus, the diameter of the first focusing unit Lf1 is reduced.
In the optical system L0 of Example 8, the second lens unit Lb is composed of two positive lenses. The refractive power is shared, so that the off-axis ray is gently curved, the occurrence of the aberration related to the decentering is reduced, and that higher performance is achieved for tilt image-capturing.
In each of Examples 1 to 8, each of all the configured lenses is a spherical lens, in order to control a reduction in optical performance due to a manufacturing error.
Next, an exemplary embodiment of a digital still camera (an imaging apparatus) using the optical system in any of the Examples as an imaging optical system will be described with reference to
In this way, the optical system in each of the Examples is applied to the imaging apparatus, such as the digital still camera or the like, so that it is possible to obtain a small imaging apparatus, with a reduced composition shift, capable of inclining an object plane on which focus is achieved to a great extent.
Specific Numerical Examples 1 to 8 corresponding to Examples 1 to 8, respectively, will be described below.
In surface data of each of the Numerical Examples 1 to 8, r represents the curvature radius of each optical surface, and d (mm) represents an on-axis interval (a distance on the optical axis) between an m-th surface and an (m+1)-th surface. However, m is a number representing a surface counted from the light incident side. Further, nd represents a refractive index with respect to the d-line of each optical member, and vd represents the Abbe number of the optical member. In a case where the refractive index of the d-line (587.6 nm) of the Fraunhofer line, the refractive index of an F-line (486.1 nm), and the refractive index of a C-line (656.3 nm) are Nd, NF, and NC, respectively, the Abbe number vd of a material is expressed by vd=(Nd−1)/(NF−NC).
In each of the Numerical Examples 1 to 8, d, focal length (mm), F-number, and half angle of view (°) all correspond to values when the optical system of the corresponding Example focuses on the infinite distance. “Back focus BF” is a distance on the optical axis from the lens last surface (a lens surface closest to the image plane) to a paraxial image plane, expressed in an air-equivalent length. “Overall lens length” is a length determined by adding a back focus to a distance on the optical axis from the forefront surface (the lens surface closest to the object) of the zoom lens to the lens last surface. “Lens unit” is not limited to one consisting of a plurality of lens, but also includes one consisting of a single lens.
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing in Numerical Example 1 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 2 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 3 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 4 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 5 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 6 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 7 indicate
The aberration diagram of the first tilt image-capturing and the aberration diagram of the second tilt image-capturing of Numerical Example 8 indicate
While the Examples and the exemplary embodiment of the disclosure are described above, the disclosure is not limited to those, and can be modified and changed in various manners within the scope of the spirit thereof.
While the disclosure has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-073276, filed Apr. 27, 2022, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2022-073276 | Apr 2022 | JP | national |