The present disclosure relates to optical detection of chemical, biological and/or physical samples.
According to a first aspect, a system for optical detection is described, the system comprising: a light source having a first side and a second side; a first optical filter having a first side and a second side, the first side of the first optical filter being substantially close to the second side of the light source; a collimation and/or guidance optics having a first side and a second side, the first side of the collimation and/or guidance optics being substantially close to the second side of the first optical filter; a second optical filter having a first side and a second side, the first side of the second optical filter being substantially close to the second side of the collimation and/or guidance optics; an optics to control stray light having a first side and a second side, the first side of the optics to control stray light being substantially close to the second side of the second optical filter; one or more absorbing layers attached to the second side of the optics to control stray light, wherein the one or more absorbing layers being partially covering the second side of the optics to control stray light, thus allowing the light from the light source to pass through; a chamber containing a sample to be illuminated, the chamber being contained in a cartridge comprising a reflector attached to a first side of the cartridge and a reflective layer attached to bottom of the cartridge, wherein the light emitted by the sample are reflected back to the sample by the reflective layer and guided by the reflector towards a second side of the cartridge; and a detector having a first side and a second side, the first side of the detector being substantially close to the second side of the cartridge, wherein the detector detects the light emitted by the sample.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the description of example embodiments, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the disclosure.
Throughout the present disclosure, embodiments and variations are described for the purpose of illustrating uses and implementations of the inventive concept. The illustrative description should be understood as presenting examples of the inventive concept, rather than as limiting the scope of the concept as disclosed herein. Like reference numerals indicate corresponding parts in various figures.
Different embodiments of the present disclosure can demonstrate different optical techniques which can allow various types of optical measurements (e.g. absorbance, fluorescence etc.) from numerous sample types. Furthermore, such technique can be coupled with quantitative laboratory methods for chemical and biochemical analysis. For example, the optical technique can be used to obtain fluorescence measurements for real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Such technique can have many advantages, for example, (but not limited to the following):
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure,
In the exemplary arrangement of the top illumination technique as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
As shown in the exemplary embodiment of
In the exemplary embodiment of
In some embodiments, the cartridge (101) can have features built-in that can aid in light collection. The sides of the cartridge (101) can have various optical shapes which can be integrated into the cartridge. In some embodiments, the sides of the cartridge (101) can be a convex shape to guide light from side of the cartridge to the detector (113). In some embodiments, external optical elements can be used as well. In the exemplary embodiment of
In some embodiments, absorbers can be strategically placed to reduce stray light by absorbing the reflected excitation light. In the exemplary embodiment of
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure,
In the exemplary arrangement of
In the exemplary embodiment of
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure,
In accordance with the present disclosure, the exemplary embodiment of
In the exemplary embodiment of
This technique can be amenable to having a compact diagnostic/analysis accessory which can be attached to a cell phone. In such cases, the LED on a cell phone can be used for illumination and the cell phone camera can act as a detector. The filter (401) can be incorporated to select the wavelength required. Such as a cell phone, or another example of accessory device, may have its own excitation source. Light guides can be used to direct the emission into the camera after passing through the filter.
In some embodiments, depending on the user needs, emission and/or excitation filters can be integrated into the design. For example, if the emission and excitation wavelength are a great deal apart, such that the excitation wavelength does not overlap with emission wavelength of interest, then the excitation filter can be omitted. In such cases, a UV LED can be used to excite visible emitting dyes. On the other hand, if the excitation is well guided and does not reach the detector in appreciable quantity (e.g. the excitation does not undergo significant total internal reflection (TIR) or is predictable, such as, at high temperatures where fluorescence of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) dyes goes very low), then both filters can be omitted. The use of a laser diode can achieve this as well.
The above mentioned technique, as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
In the exemplary optical techniques of the present disclosure, CD laser diodes and optics, and rotating disc platforms can be used as well. In some embodiments, vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) can also be used for excitation. In cases where a cover film is used (like in hybridization, PCB or metal cavity—the walls can be opaque) the emission light can travel in the cover film since in most cases it will have a higher index of refraction, as shown in
In some embodiments, there is light trapped in the cover film which can be used for detection. In such cases, a prism structure can be used to collect emission. For example, each well of a 96-well plate (as known in the art) can receive excitation illumination, one at a time. The cover film can be used to get the emission for all wells in series allowing a compact fluorometer. There can be one large absorbance filter also acting as an excitation filter. Since LEDs are low in cost, an array can be used. The use of opaque walls helps since if the plate is made of clear material the emission can also cause excitation of dyes in other wells. However, the light in the cover film (410) is going from each well to the end of cover film as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
As an implementation of the optical technique, as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
In several embodiments of the present disclosure, the sample area can be illuminated from the top, either normally to the sample surface, or at an angle to the normal. In several embodiments, the detectors can be placed on the side of the sample area. Such configurations can have several advantages, including but not limited to a compact design and an easier access to the sample area. The embodiments that use cartridges for the samples to be analyzed, the top illumination and side detection configuration can be advantageous as it can allow the cartridge to be easily inserted in the structure and the reflecting light to be efficiently collected at the sides. The cartridges can be designed to allow efficient collection from the sides of the structure. The side detection configuration can allow less light to reach the detector which does not carry information from the analyzed sample.
The examples set forth above are provided to those of ordinary skill in the art a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the embodiments of the gamut mapping of the disclosure, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventor/inventors regard as their disclosure.
Modifications of the above-described modes for carrying out the methods and systems herein disclosed are obvious to persons of skill in the art and are intended to be within the scope of the following claims. All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the disclosure pertains. All references cited in this disclosure are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference had been incorporated by reference in its entirety individually.
It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to particular methods or systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The term “plurality” includes two or more referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure pertains.
A number of embodiments of the disclosure have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/679,552 filed on Aug. 3, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application may be related to U.S. Pat. No. 8,395,773, entitled “Optical Devices and Methods for Measuring Samples”, filed on Jun. 21, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4930361 | Nimberger | Jun 1990 | A |
5196830 | Birging et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5272518 | Vincent | Dec 1993 | A |
5508197 | Hansen et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5820265 | Kleinerman | Oct 1998 | A |
5871699 | Ruggeri | Feb 1999 | A |
6222619 | Herron et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6441890 | Wardlaw | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6544734 | Briscoe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6623696 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6902112 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7411792 | Richards et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7564541 | Tuschel | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7754153 | Miyamoto et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8058054 | Owen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8071385 | Haas et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8277760 | Lehto | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8395773 | Malik et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020046614 | Alley | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020160534 | Herron et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030109806 | Weber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040091862 | Brandenburg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040152206 | Davis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050024636 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036142 | Oldham et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042651 | Vann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059165 | Davis et al. | Mar 2005 | A9 |
20050099621 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109396 | Zucchelli et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050282266 | Teng et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060186346 | Wei | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211071 | Andre et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233670 | Lehto | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060289787 | Ohman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060290934 | Boekelman | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070084279 | Huang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272039 | Hermet et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003649 | Maltezos et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080176230 | Owen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176755 | Amundson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090050209 | Rautavuori et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090176661 | Harding et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100051124 | Imran | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100120164 | Salafsky | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152066 | Malik et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100184229 | Haas et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192706 | Fairs et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100321696 | Malik et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110104026 | Yoon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110151577 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110207137 | Malik et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110306120 | Nicholls et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003631 | Yu et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120180882 | Malik et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1972919 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2002-139418 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-214225 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2012-100549 | May 2012 | JP |
0021659 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2007102713 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2011-005487 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed on Oct. 16, 2013 for PCT/US2013/051461 filed on Jul. 22, 2013 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Written Opinion mailed on Oct. 16, 2013 for PCT/US2013/051461 filed on Jul. 22, 2013 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 3, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,829, filed on Dec. 15, 2009 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,829, filed on Dec. 15, 2009 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 16, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,829, filed on Dec. 15, 2009 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,104, filed on Jun. 21, 2010 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,104, filed on Jun. 21, 2010 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
International Search Report mailed on Feb. 7, 2011 for PCT/US2010/039389 filed on Jun. 21, 2010 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 7, 2011 for PCT/US2010/039389 filed on Jun. 21, 2010 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,785, filed on Jan. 19, 2011 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on May 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,785, filed on Jan. 19, 2011 in the name of the California Institute of Technology. |
Restriction Requirement issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,829, filed on Dec. 15, 2009 in the name of Imran R. Malik et al.; mailing date: Oct. 20, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,104, filed on Jun. 21, 2010 in the name of Imran R. Malik et al.; mailing date: Dec. 24, 2012. |
Restriction Requirement mailed on Mar. 5, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,785, filed on Jan. 19, 2011 in the name of California Institute of Technology. |
PCT International Search Report mailed on Feb. 3, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068170 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 3, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068170 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT International Search Report mailed on Feb. 17, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068171 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 17, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068171 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT International Search Report mailed on Feb. 6, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068173 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 6, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068173 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT International Search Report mailed on Feb. 17, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068169 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 17, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068169 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT International Search Report mailed on Feb. 14, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068165 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 14, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068165 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,829 filed on Dec. 15, 2009 in the name of Imran R. Malik et al. |
Non-Final Office Action mail on Nov. 26, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,644 filed on Feb. 28, 2012 in the name of Imran R. Malik et al. |
Restriction Requirement mailed on Sep. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,644 filed on Feb. 28, 2012 in the name of Imran R. Malik et al. |
PCT International Search Report mailed on Feb. 5, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068172 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
PCT Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 5, 2014 for PCT application PCT/US2013/068172 filed on Nov. 1, 2013 in the name of CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140036267 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61679552 | Aug 2012 | US |