This application is the US National Stage under 35 USC § 371 of International App. No. PCT/FR2017/051110 filed May 10, 2017, which claims priority to French application 1654486 filed on 19 May 2016, the contents of which (text, drawings and claims) are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention concerns the field of optical telemetry, for estimating distance between a few tens of centimeters and a few tens of meters, and more particularly a system for measuring the distance between two moving objects such as robots or motor vehicles that follow one another.
This system could complement the FMCW radar technologies that are already deployed (but sensitive to interference) or LIDAR (still little deployed because they are relatively expensive) for short-distance and heavy traffic applications such as grouping vehicles into platoons of road convoys (known as platooning).
However, the principle can be extended to fields of application other than motor vehicles, for example for traveling carriages used in a factory or for industrial robots.
Numerous telemetry solutions are known in the state of the art, based on the use of sound or ultrasound waves, electromagnetic, radio frequency or light waves.
In the latter category, telemeters that implement a laser source are known.
Two distance measurement techniques are generally used in motor vehicles:
The coherent detection method is used in FMCW (Frequency Modulation Continuous-Wave) radar systems, the principle of which is as follows: a signal with a sawtooth modulated frequency is transmitted by the system. This signal is then reflected by the target whose distance from the system we wish to measure. The echo received by the system has undergone a frequency offset proportional to the system/target distance. This type of radar uses coherent radio waves.
Direct detection by time-of-flight measurement is used in Radar Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) type systems, where the carrier wave is a radio wave, and in LIDAR, where the carrier wave is a light wave, usually monochromatic, infrared and coherent. It can also be used with (ultra)sound waves (for the reversing sensors, for example). Two methods are used for time-of-flight measurement:
A particular example of the carrier wave being an optical wave is disclosed in EP2962127, which concerns a method for determining a distance of an object from a motor vehicle by using a PMD sensor, comprising the following steps:—in a measurement cycle, measuring a phase shift of a measurement signal reflected by the object for at least one modulation frequency,
EP0300663 describes another example of optical telemetry implementing a light source modulated by continuous amplitude modulation, a sensor to pick up part of the optical energy sent back by an object, and means for measuring the distance to the object by detecting the phase difference between the modulation of the optical energy radiated and the modulation of the optical energy sent back, comprising a means to compensate for the variation in the level of optical energy sent back.
Also known, in a context that does not involve measuring the distance between two moving vehicles but measuring with high precision the determination of the position of a moving object in relation to a fixed terminal, is a method described in EP0961134.
EP0961134 describes an automated roadway system comprising transponders or data stations spaced apart in known positions along the roadway. This roadway system allows a vehicle to determine its position as it travels along the roadway. Each vehicle is equipped with a transmitter transmitting a spread-spectrum emission signal that is pseudo (PN) coded. The signal emitted is received by the transponder of a terminal arranged at the edge of the roadway. This transponder emits a response signal to a receptor on board a vehicle. The receiver also receives a second signal that can be a response signal coming from the same transponder or a response signal coming from an adjacent transponder. The system then measures a time difference between the transmission of the original interrogation signal of the vehicle and the receipt of its corresponding response signal in order to determine the distance between the vehicle and the transponder or the reflector. On the basis of the distances determined, the positions of the transponders and the distance traveled by the vehicle during its communications, the position of a vehicle is determined by using triangulation methods.
Also known are publications by UCHIDA et al. “A vehicle-to-vehicle communication and ranging system based on spread-spectrum technique-SS communication radar” released at the “Vehicle navigation and information systems conference proceedings 1994, Yokohama Japan, 31 Aug. 1994, ISBN 978-to-7803-2105-2” or MIZUI et al. “A vehicle-to-vehicle communication and ranging system based on spread-spectrum technique” ISSN 8756-6621 or SUZUKI et al. “Laser radar and visible light in a bidirectional V2V communication and ranging system” 2015 IEEE ICVES XP032866885. These articles propose solutions based on laser beams emitting a monochromatic and coherent light in order to measure the distance between two vehicles.
The solutions of the prior art compulsorily require the use of coherent and directive light sources, in order to prevent external disturbances. The reflected signal is, with such sources, certainly noisy but sufficiently powerful and “clean” to ensure the measurement of distance over several tens of meters.
However, these sources are expensive and require the addition of an additional optical component with respect to the standard equipment of a car, for example a laser source or additional LED built into the vehicle.
The solutions of the prior art do not allow sources that are already built into a vehicle to be used for other purposes, for example the front and rear lights. In fact, these sources are polychromatic, incoherent and dispersive, and cause a problem of attenuation of the signal after reflection.
Another drawback of the solutions of the prior art is that they are sensitive to the interferences generated by similar adjacent systems. If system X sends a signal and receives the signal of system Y rather than the desired echo, the measurement will be false. This is why PN codes are used. This solution certainly prevents collisions between the signals emitted by two vehicles in the same detection zone of a terminal, but requires the individualization of the code equipping each vehicle. For a string length of given PN signals, the number of codes available is limited and so allows only a limited number of vehicles to be equipped with a unique code. The increase in the length of the string certainly allows the number of vehicles that can be equipped to be increased but then involves heavy and slow data processing operations in order to calculate autocorrelation.
Moreover, such a solution requires a coherent and monochromatic light signal to prevent disturbances by parasitic light and is not suitable for sending incoherent white or colored light signals.
In order to overcome these drawbacks, the invention concerns in its broadest sense an optical telemetry system according to claim 1 and the dependent claims.
In the context of the present patent, a “conventional light source” means an electric light source that is not a laser beam. The conventional light sources implemented by the invention are not simultaneously monochrome, directive and coherent. Specifically in the context of the present invention, a “conventional light source” constitutes a white or colored electroluminescent diode, an LED array or assembly, or an electric filament lamp, or even a vehicle lamp or signaling light.
The invention also concerns a telemetry method according to the claims.
A better understanding of the present invention will emerge from the following detailed description of a non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
General principle of the invention
The followed vehicle is equipped with a sensor (5) and a light emitting diode light source (6) emitting a beam (7) in the direction of the following vehicle (1), which is equipped with a sensor (8).
In a first example, the first optoelectronic assembly is formed by a single light source SLs and one photosensitive sensor CPs, both oriented towards the front of the vehicle. The second optoelectronic assembly is formed by one light source SLc (6) and one photosensitive sensor CPc (5) oriented towards the rear of the vehicle.
The term “a single conventional source” can refer to an LED, for example, or to an array of LEDs forming a headlamp or signaling light.
The following vehicle (1) is equipped with an optoelectronic assembly comprising an LED light source (2) powered by a driver circuit (10). This driver circuit (10) is controlled by a square-wave signal generator (11) delivering a modulation signal at a frequency of 1 MHz, in the example described. This modulation frequency is preferably between 0.5 and 10 MHz.
The light signal transmitted, when it is received by the sensor (5) of the followed vehicle or target (4), is attenuated and noisy.
The sensor (5) of the followed vehicle or target (4) delivers a noisy electrical signal to a processing circuit (12) comprising a step of amplifying and a step of filtering the signal received, then a step of comparison in order to reconstruct the square-wave signal emitted. This square-wave signal is transmitted to a phase-locked loop (PLL) making it possible to control an oscillator (13), the phase of which is identical to that of the reconstructed signal. The frequency of this oscillator (13) is identical to that of the oscillator (11), or a multiple or sub-multiple of this frequency.
This processing makes it possible to restore a signal having a shape factor close to that of the signal emitted by the light source (2) of the following vehicle, and to eliminate the noise caused by the parasitic light coming from road lighting, ambient light or various reflections that can illuminate the sensor of the followed vehicle.
The re-emitted signal (14, 6) is received by the sensor (8) of the following vehicle (1) then processed by a circuit (15) in order to be reconstructed as a square-wave signal. This reconstructed signal is then transposed at a lower intermediate frequency by a heterodyne mixer circuit (16).
The output of the circuit (16) is used as the input of a microcomputer (17) controlled by an algorithm for measuring the phase shift. The signal emitted in the first place is also transposed to the intermediate frequency in order to be compared, during the phase shift measurement, to the signal received by the following vehicle and heterodyned.
Unlike FMCW or LIDAR/ultrasound-detector radars, the disclosed system describes by way of non-limiting example the use of white light produced by the LED lamps of vehicles, or colored light in the case of light produced by other signaling lamps.
This light is polychromatic and incoherent. Consequently, the wave reflected by the target will be much more attenuated than in the case of a coherent wave, making it impossible for the system to work directly with the reflected wave.
Its principle, summarized in
Once the phase shift has been retrieved, it must be measured in order to find the distance datum. The method used to measure the phase shift is given as an indication.
The method described is based on a clock rising edge counter. The principle of this method is illustrated in
This approach, however, introduces a compromise: the higher the frequency of the signal emitted, the better the theoretical resolution of the distance measurement. However, for a fixed fcp frequency, the higher the frequency of the signal emitted, the poorer the resolution of the phase shift measurement by the clock rising edge counter. In order to overcome this problem, a conventional technique involves emitting the signal at a high frequency then transposing the echo received to a lower frequency before processing it, according to the principle of heterodyne processing based on the multiplication of several frequencies combined by a mixer.
The processing carried out in order to calculate the distance can take into account, in order to improve the relevance of the calculation, the delay introduced by the processing circuit (12) by de-noising the signal received by the sensor of the followed vehicle, in order to control the signal emitted by the followed vehicle.
This delay can be taken into account in the form of a fixed parameter taken into account in order to calculate the distance. This fixed parameter is determined experimentally or by modeling based on the nominal processing time of the processing circuit (12).
It can also be formed by a variable parameter that can be periodically updated, for example in the event of a change in the processing technologies on the vehicles.
It can also be updated by learning based on other data on the remote measurement of the distance between the following vehicle and the followed vehicle available on the following vehicle, for example geo-tracking data of both vehicles received by the following vehicle, or data coming from other telemetry equipment, for example systems using a laser or sound source.
The signal controlling the light source of one and/or the other vehicle can also form the object of an encoding to transmit information such as vehicle speed, or an identity or braking information or possibly the date and time, or even information relating to distance, by clock comparison.
This encoding can be a Manchester type encoding, also call biphase encoding or PE (Phase Encoding), introducing a transition in the middle of each interval. It involves implementing an exclusive OR (XOR) between the signal and the clock signal, which translates into a rising edge if the bit is zero and a falling edge if it is not.
It can also be an “encoding of pairs of four-bit values into pairs of six-bit symbols” type encoding, as described for example in European patent EP0629067.
Such a type of encoding is fundamentally different from a pseudo-random encoding described in EP0961134.
The encoded information can for example include information on the activation of braking or acceleration by a vehicle, during platooning, in order to disseminate this information to the other following vehicles.
The example of implementation described allows distance in the longitudinal direction to be provided, on the right between the optoelectronic assembly equipping the following vehicle and the optoelectronic assembly equipping the followed vehicle.
It is possible to provide additional information concerning the lateral offset of the two vehicles, for example in order to provide information on preparation for overtaking or switching to another traffic lane.
According to this variation, different combinations can be envisaged:
a) The following vehicle can comprise an optoelectronic assembly formed by one light source SLs and two photosensitive sensors CPs, arranged for example on either side at the front of the vehicle, while the followed vehicle, constituting the target, comprises an optoelectronic assembly formed by at least one light source SLc and one photosensitive sensor CPc spaced apart.
b) The following vehicle can comprise an optoelectronic assembly formed by two offset light sources SLs, for example on either side at the front of the vehicle, and two photosensitive sensors CPs, while the followed vehicle comprises an optoelectronic assembly formed by two light sources SLc and two photosensitive sensors CPc spaced apart, for example arranged on either side at the back of the vehicle.
In this case, each of the light sources SL of the following vehicle and the source located on the same side on the followed vehicle is modulated with a specific frequency F.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1654486 | May 2016 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2017/051110 | 5/10/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/198927 | 11/23/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7751726 | Gazzola et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
9562972 | Pollmer | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20090072996 | Schoepp | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20160363659 | Mindell | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
112152646 | Dec 2020 | CN |
102018102979 | Aug 2019 | DE |
0300663 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0629067 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0961134 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2962127 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2014-16809 | Jan 2014 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report corresponding to PCT/FR2017/051110 dated Aug. 7, 2017. |
Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/FR2017/051110 dated Aug. 7, 2017. |
Masatoshi Uchida et al: “A vehicle-to-vehicle communication and ranging system based on spread spectrum technique-SS communication radar”, 1994 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference Proceedings; Aug. 31-Sep. 2, 1994, Yokohama, Japan; pp. 169-174; 1994 New York, NY USA IEEE. |
Kiyoshi Mizui et al.: “Vehicle-toVehicle Communications and Ranginjg System Using Spread Spectrum Techniques”; Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 1, vol. 79, No. 12, 1996; Dec. 1, 1996, pp. 106-115; Communications, Wiley, Hoboken NJ, US, XP000679210. |
Akira John Suzuki et al.: “Laser Radar and Visible Light in a Bidirectional V2V Communication and Ranging System”, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), IEEE; Nov. 5, 2015, pp. 19-24; DOI: 10.1109/ICVES.2015.7396887. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190204444 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |