The present invention relates generally to fiber optic cable. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved optical trunk cable having a plurality of cable units that may be individually branched.
The ability of high-quality optical fiber to transmit large amounts of information without appreciable signal degradation is well known. As a result, optical fibers have found widespread use in many applications, such as voice and data transmission. For example, the need for greater bandwidth in residential settings has brought optical fibers directly into homes and multiple dwelling units (MDUs). Such applications have generally come to be known by the acronym FTTH (“Fiber To The Home”).
In deployment of fiber optic cable for FTTH applications there is a need to access one or more fibers within a cable at various points over a given route. Each time the cable is accessed the integrity of the cable is compromised. The jacket is opened and buffer tubes accessed to remove and splice individual fibers. A sealing mechanism such as a closure must be used to cover this access point and protect the fiber and cable from the environment. Since accessing fiber from the cable exposes potentially all fibers depending on the cable design this method is fraught with risk as other fibers could be damaged.
The present invention recognizes the foregoing considerations, and others, of the prior art.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides an optical trunk cable comprising at least one elongated strength member and a plurality of elongated optical fiber units. Each of the optical fiber units may have an inner jacket containing a plurality of optical fibers. The optical fiber units further have an outer jacket, the optical fiber units and the elongated strength member being interconnected via a plurality of webs.
Other objects, features and aspects of the present invention are provided by various combinations and subcombinations of the disclosed elements, as well as methods of practicing same, which are discussed in greater detail below.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification, including reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent same or analogous features or elements of the invention.
It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present invention, which broader aspects are embodied in the exemplary constructions.
Referring now to
In this embodiment, optical fiber units 12 are interconnected both to each other and to CSM 14 via respective webs, such as webs 16 and 18. Webs 16 and 18 may be formed of the same material that forms the outer jacket 20 of each optical fiber unit 12. For example, a reverse oscillating lay (ROL) apparatus may be used during the outer jacket and web extrusion process. Various aspects of a ROL apparatus and process may be discerned from U.S. Pat. No. 6,546,712, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. The reverse oscillated lay desirably allows for omnidirectional bending of the cable. Preferably, however, the thickness of the webs may be slightly less than the outer jacket thickness to facilitate separation.
For example, in a preferred embodiment, each optical fiber unit may have a diameter of approximately 4 mm, with the overall cable diameter being about 12 mm. The unit outer jacket thickness may be about 0.5 mm in such embodiments, with a web thickness of less than about 0.3 mm. It will appreciated that this configuration limits exposure of cable components and allows access of only the desired optical fiber units (sub-units). By individually protecting each sub-unit as an individual cable and tying those units together, access is obtained while continuing to protect the rest of the fiber cable. The webs will allow a technician to easily select the desired unit to be accessed and with common tools remove it from the cable. This sub-unit can then be routed and terminated for drop cable termination.
As described above, trunk cables of the prior art have an outer sheath which must be cut in order to access the optical fiber units or individual optical fibers contained inside. This often presents difficulties during the branching process. In contrast, trunk cable 10 does not have an outer sheath in which all of the optical fiber units are contained. This facilitates branching of the optical fiber units as will be described below.
The respective optical fiber units 12 will typically contain a plurality of optical fibers for providing data communication to a corresponding customer. In this regard,
Referring to
In order to accomplish this, unit 12-2 is cut (as indicated at 50) at a position higher than B1. This provides a tail portion 52 which can be removed from the bundle for optical connection to existing horizontal cable in the building. It will be appreciated that tail portion will need to be separated from the rest of the bundle by cutting or otherwise separating the interconnecting webs. Similarly, a tail portion 54 can be formed by cutting at location 56 and separating from the rest of the bundle. Depending on the length of tail portions 54 and 56, they may each serve as horizontal cable as is, without the need to splice to other cable.
In an alternate interpretation of
It can thus be seen that the present invention provides an improved optical trunk cable having various advantages over the prior art. These advantages include:
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, modifications and variations may be made thereto by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Furthermore, it should be understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged both in whole or in part. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to be limitative of the invention as further described in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/118,229, titled “Optical Trunk Cable Having Web-Connected Sub-Unitized Configuration,” filed Feb. 19, 2015, which is hereby relied upon and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4952020 | Huber | Aug 1990 | A |
5039195 | Jenkins | Aug 1991 | A |
5188883 | Rawlyk | Feb 1993 | A |
5569050 | Lloyd | Oct 1996 | A |
5602953 | Delage | Feb 1997 | A |
5636308 | Personne | Jun 1997 | A |
6188821 | McAlpine | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6249628 | Rutterman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6295401 | Rutterman | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6356690 | McAlpine | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363192 | Spooner | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6529663 | Parris | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546175 | Wagman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563990 | Hurley | May 2003 | B1 |
6734364 | Price | May 2004 | B2 |
6813422 | Krishnamurthy | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823120 | Hurley | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6928217 | Mohler | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7391943 | Blazer | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7454107 | Miller | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7558454 | Keller | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8538216 | Abernathy | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8768127 | Burnett | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8818156 | Nave | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9091830 | Blazer | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9136045 | Burke | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9239441 | Melton | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9316801 | Kithuka | Apr 2016 | B1 |
20020125036 | Price | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136512 | Dallas | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040022504 | Hurley | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040062496 | Shuman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050013565 | Mohler | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050213903 | Mohler | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060237221 | Glew | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060269198 | Blazer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070098343 | Miller | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102188 | Glew | May 2007 | A1 |
20070269171 | Keller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080041622 | Seufert | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066947 | Glew | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090169159 | Keller | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090214168 | Roscoe | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100322563 | Melton | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110038586 | Keller | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110229098 | Abernathy | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243514 | Nav | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20140369656 | Gimblet | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150086168 | Blazer | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150117825 | Burke | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150310964 | Larson | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160018612 | Czosnowski | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041354 | Guenter | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160133355 | Glew | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2527580 | Jun 2014 | GB |
WO-2015198017 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62118229 | Feb 2015 | US |