Patent Application
20200393609
The invention relates to optical waveguides. In particular, the invention relates to waveguides comprising at least one diffractive optical element for modifying the light field in the waveguide. Such waveguides can be used in personal display devices, such as head-mounted displays (HMDs) and head-up displays (HUDs).
Waveguides are key image-forming elements in many modern personal display devices. The image to be displayed can be coupled into and out of the waveguide, as well as modified within the waveguide, using diffractive gratings. For example, there may be provided an in-coupling grating for coupling an image from a projector into the waveguide, an exit pupil expander grating for expanding the light field in one or more in-plane dimensions of the waveguide, and an out-coupling grating which couples the light field out of the waveguide to the user's eye.
It is an aim of the invention to overcome at least some of the drawbacks of prior art. A particular aim is to provide a diffractive waveguide element that allows for implementation of complex optical functions and which reduces the risk of beam fragmentation and/or power loss.
In particular, the invention is characterized by what is stated in the independent claims.
According to one aspect, there is provided an optical waveguide comprising a waveguide body capable of guiding light in a waveguide plane in two dimensions, and a diffractive optical element provided on a surface or within the waveguide body, the diffractive optical element extending in said two dimensions and each location of the diffractive optical element having a diffractive optical response for light directed thereto. According to the invention, the diffractive optical element is a multi-region element comprising a plurality of regions with different diffractive optical responses. Furthermore, the diffractive optical response of the diffractive optical element between said regions changes continuously in the waveguide plane. The change may take place along one or two dimensions of the plane.
According to another aspect, the invention provides a diffractive waveguide display comprising an optical waveguide as described above and an image projector for providing an image-containing light field inside the optical waveguide.
The invention offers significant benefits. First, a multi-region DOE without sharp interfaces between the regions allows for implementation of waveguides having complex optical behavior but without the drawback of beam fragmentation. Continuous transition instead of fading the diffractive pattern at the interfaces increases the total efficiency of the DOE and also reduces beam fragmentation. As a result, light may take more bounces within the waveguide and interacting with the DOE, still maintaining its direction and power, i.e., heading where it is intended to go with good efficiency.
Compared with sharp interface DOEs, continuous transitions also make the present DOE less sensitive to changes in position and angle of incoming light and light propagating in the waveguide. Thus, the behavior of the DOE is more predictable and robust.
The dependent claims are directed to selected embodiments of the invention.
Next, embodiments of the invention and advantages thereof are discussed in more detail with reference to the attached drawings.
The term “diffractive optical element” (DOE) refers to a zone of the waveguide body comprising a physical structure capable of diffracting light. The structure typically comprises a pattern of features having a size of 1 μm or less. Examples of DOEs commonly used in conventional personal display devices are in-coupling gratings, exit pupil expander gratings and out-coupling gratings. However, it should be noted that in the present invention, to achieve the continuous transition, all or part of the DOE can be non-periodic, whereby the term DOE herein covers also other structures than gratings (in the sense that the term “grating” is usually understood as a periodic structure).
The term “intermediate DOE” is referred to as a DOE that is not intended to out-couple light directly therefrom, but to change the propagation path of light rays from one layer to another. Due to imperfections, a certain amount of out-coupling may, however occur. Typically, at least 90% of propagating light hitting the intermediate DOE, continues propagation in either the original layer or the new layer, depending on the predefined optical response.
“Diffractive optical response” of the DOE refers to the change in the angular and/or spectral distribution of light by the DOE due to diffraction. To concretize, the response may be e.g. diffraction intensity to a specific angle for a fixed incident angle and wavelength. A diffractive microstructure pattern of the DOE generates the diffractive optical response.
Continuous change in the diffractive optical response means that a small change of location of the DOE for incident light beam (in the order of feature size of the microstructure pattern) results in small change in the response for at least one wavelength. Typically, the change is continuous for a wide range of incident angles and/or wavelengths.
“Non-periodic” structure herein means a structure that does not have building unit that repeats at regular intervals. In this context, traditional gratings or zones thereof, in which the same grating unit (like a binary ridge/groove) repeats with a regular period, even if being height-modulated in order to change diffraction efficiency locally, are considered periodic structures.
“Multi-region” DOE refers to a DOE that has several internal regions with different diffractive optical response. The regions have a real area and the diffractive optical response within those regions is constant. The continuous changing of the diffractive optical response takes place between the regions with smooth transitions.
In some solutions, herein called multi-region diffractive optical elements (DOEs), there are a plurality of different grating regions next to each other, the grating regions having different properties, such as the grating period, grating microstructure or grating line directions, and therefore a different diffractive optical response. These different grating regions may have dimensions which are in the same order of magnitude as the diameter of the light beam directed to the grating initially, which can be e.g. 1-3 mm. This has the drawback that boundary zones between two grating regions cause significant distortion to the light field, as the beam is split every time it hits such boundary zone, and light power is lost to stray angles. The same problem is, however, present even with narrower beams and/or larger grating regions, since the amount of bounces within the waveguide is typically very large and the probability of boundary zone hits is therefore large. The problem is thus of particular significance in complex grating designs in which the beam bounces several times at a multi-area grating while propagating in the waveguide. After a number of bounces, the beam is fragmented and significant amount of light power is lost.
There is a need for improved multi-region diffractive optical elements.
In some embodiments, the diffractive optical element comprises regions with different optical responses distributed in the waveguide plane. That is, the DOE is truly two-dimensional. An example of such waveguide is shown in
Although the response is herein illustrated only for one predefined diffraction angle with a predefined angle of incidence and wavelength, the intensity typically changes continuously for a plurality of angles of incidence and/or wavelengths. Thus, to illustrate the full diffractive optical response of the DOE, similar continuous response graphs can be produced for several incident angles, diffraction angles and wavelength parameter sets.
Like in the example of
In some embodiments, the DOE contains at least one zone that has non-periodic microstructure. In some cases, the DOE is non-periodic over the whole element.
In some embodiments, the diffractive optical response of the diffractive optical element changes continuously over the whole element. That is, there are no constant-grating regions in the DOE.
In some embodiments, illustrated by
In some embodiments, the microstructure of the DOE is free from sections with a graded profile, in particular free from lateral height slopes, which take the local height of the microstructure and therefore the local efficiency of the DOE gradually to zero or close to zero, or, alternatively take the height to the height of a neighboring grating contained by the waveguide element.
In some embodiments, the height of the microstructure throughout the DOE is approximately constant. Thus, the continuous variation of diffractive optical response is achieved by other properties of the microstructure than feature height.
In alternative embodiments, there is within the DOE a plurality of approximately constant height regions with different non-zero microstructure heights, the diffractive optical response from one region to another changing continuously.
Approximately constant height herein means that the local height variation of the microstructure is less than 10%.
Local height of the microstructure is herein defined, applying to non-periodic and irregular diffractive structures as well as to periodic and regular diffractive structures, as the height difference between a lowest and highest point of the microstructure (lowest valley to highest peak) in the normal direction of the waveguide plane within a circular area having a diameter of 5 μm.
Typically, the microstructure height is between 20 and 500 nm.
Lateral maximum feature dimensions can vary for example from 10 to 700 nm.
In some embodiments, at each location of the diffractive optical element, the optical response of the diffractive optical element is unique with respect to other locations thereof.
Waveguide structures with continuous optical response find uses in for example augmented reality (AR) applications, where an improvement of the characteristics of the system require the use of a multitude of different propagation directions for each FOV angle. In such systems, the standard way of dividing the grating region into adjacent sub-regions, where the grating structures is held constant, cannot be used. This is so since the beams corresponding to the FOV angles will be subdivided by the sub-region boundaries to such an extent that their parts become highly divergent and the diffraction into unwanted propagation directions as associated with the subdivisions, and which leads to FOV angle cross-talk, becomes significant.
The use of structures with a continuous optical response furthermore adds system tolerance to small errors since for example slight misalignments of the beam or beam travel due to manufacturing errors cause only small changes to the overall output of the system. This is in contrast to systems with clearly defined sub-regions, where misalignments of the beams can lead to dramatic changes in overall output.
In some embodiments, the waveguide is a display waveguide of a diffractive personal display, such as a head mounted display (HMD) or head-up display (HUD), and the diffractive optical element is an in-coupling element, exit pupil expander element or out-coupling element thereof. The DOE can also be an intermediate power redistribution element (intermediate DOE) between a plurality of waveguide layers.
Indeed, in some embodiments, the waveguide is a multilayered waveguide and the diffractive optical element is an intermediate DOE positioned between two waveguide layers and interacts optically with the two layers. In particular, there may be provided a waveguide display element for guiding an image from a first lateral zone of the element to a second lateral zone of the element, the element comprising a plurality of waveguide layers on top of each other, and the element further comprising at least one intermediate DOE of the present kind arranged between two of the waveguide layers. The intermediate DOE is adapted to change the distribution of propagating light power between the layers, according to its local diffractive optical response.
According to one aspect, the invention also provides a method of designing an optical waveguide. The method comprises
The method may further comprise
According to one aspect, the invention provides a method of manufacturing an optical waveguide as herein described. The method comprises first determining the diffractive patterns as discussed above and then manufacturing the waveguide having a diffractive optical element composed of the diffractive patterns determined.
Once designed for example using the principles discussed herein, the diffractive optical element can be manufactured using optical microfabrication techniques known per se.
Embodiments of the invention can be utilized in various personal display devices, augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR) and mixed reality (MR) devices, like near-to-the-eye displays (NEDs) and other head-mounted displays (HMDs), as well as head-up displays (HUDs), in their different forms.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20176159 | Dec 2017 | FI | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FI2018/050893 | 12/10/2018 | WO | 00 |
