1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an optical waveguide for a touch panel which is used as a detection means for detecting a finger touch position and the like in a touch panel.
2. Description of the Related Art
A touch panel is an input device for operating an apparatus by directly touching a display screen of a liquid crystal display and the like with a finger, a purpose-built stylus and the like. The touch panel includes a display that displays operation details and the like, and a detection means that detects the position (coordinates) of a portion of the display screen of the display touched with the finger and the like. Information indicating the touch position detected by the detection means is sent in the form of a signal to the apparatus, which in turn performs an operation and the like displayed on the touch position. Examples of the apparatus employing such a touch panel include ATMs in banking facilities, ticket vending machines in stations, and portable game machines.
A detection means employing optical waveguides has been proposed as the detection means that detects the finger touch position and the like in the aforementioned touch panel, as disclosed in, for example, Japanese Published Patent Application No. 2010-15247. Specifically, as shown in
The touch panel including the optical waveguides A0 and B0, however, has failed to detect the finger touch position and the like in some instances. Warpage or distortion in locations where the optical waveguides A0 and B0 are provided results in warpage or distortion in the optical waveguides A0 and B0 themselves, which in turn prevents the light beams S0 emitted from the light-emitting optical waveguide A0 from entering the light-receiving optical waveguide B0. The touch panel including the optical waveguides A0 and B0 still has room for improvement in this regard.
An optical waveguide for a touch panel is provided which is capable of causing light beams emitted from a light-emitting optical waveguide section to enter a light-receiving optical waveguide section even when warpage or distortion occurs in the optical waveguide itself.
The optical waveguide for a touch panel comprises: cores; and an over cladding layer provided to cover the cores, the optical waveguide being provided along the periphery of a display screen of a display of a touch panel, the cores including a light-emitting core for emitting a light beam and a light-receiving core for receiving the light beam, the light-emitting core having an end surface positioned on one side of the display screen of the display, the light-receiving core having an end surface positioned on the other side of the display screen of the display, the over cladding layer including a first edge covering the end surface of the light-emitting core and configured in the form of a light-emitting lens portion having an outwardly-bulging arcuately curved surface as seen in vertical sectional view, and a second edge covering the end surface of the light-receiving core and configured in the form of a light-receiving lens portion having an outwardly-bulging arcuately curved surface as seen in vertical sectional view, the light-emitting lens portion having one of the following configurations: a first configuration in which a light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion is adapted to diffuse in the direction of the height of the light-emitting lens portion; and a second configuration in which the height of the light-emitting lens portion is less than that of the light-receiving lens portion.
The optical waveguide is designed so that a light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion is diffused (diverged) in the direction of the height of the light-emitting lens portion or so that the height of the light-emitting lens portion is less than that of the light-receiving lens portion (in other words, so that the height of the light-receiving lens portion is greater than that of the light-emitting lens portion). Thus, if warpage or distortion occurs in the optical waveguide itself, the optical waveguide enables the light-receiving lens portion to lie within a light-receiving region, thereby causing the light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion to enter the light-receiving lens portion. Of course, the optical waveguide is capable of causing a light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion to enter the light-receiving lens portion when neither the warpage nor the distortion occurs.
Preferably, the first configuration of the light-emitting lens portion satisfies
M=H1×(1+a×L/100)
0<a≦5
H1=H2
where H1 is the height of the light-emitting lens portion in millimeters, H2 is the height of the light-receiving lens portion in millimeters, L is a distance between edges of the light-emitting and light-receiving lens portions in millimeters, and M is a vertical width of a light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion as measured at the edge of the light-receiving lens portion in millimeters. In this case, the light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion is adapted to diffuse in the direction of the height of the light-emitting lens portion so that the vertical width (M) of the light beam is greater than 1.0 times the height (H1) of the light-emitting lens portion and is not greater than 1.5 times the height (H1) as measured at a position spaced a distance of ten times the height (H1) apart from the edge of the light-emitting lens portion, for example. The vertical width (M) of the light beam is optimized while warpage or distortion is accommodated.
Preferably, the second configuration of the light-emitting lens portion satisfies
H2=H1×(1+a×L/100)
0<a≦5
H1=M
where H1 is the height of the light-emitting lens portion in millimeters, H2 is the height of the light-receiving lens portion in millimeters, L is a distance between edges of the light-emitting and light-receiving lens portions in millimeters, and M is a vertical width of a light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion as measured at the edge of the light-receiving lens portion in millimeters. In this case, for example, when the distance (L) between the edges of the light-emitting and light-receiving lens portions is ten times the height (H1) of the light-emitting lens portion, the height (H2) of the light-receiving lens portion is greater than the height (H1) of the light-emitting lens portion so as to be greater than 1.0 times the height (H1) and to be not greater than 1.5 times the height (H1). The height (H2) of the light-receiving lens portion is optimized while warpage or distortion is accommodated.
Preferably, the vertical width of a light beam emitted from the light-emitting lens portion is set in consideration for a distance from a light-emitting surface of the light-emitting core to the edge of the light-emitting lens portion, and the radius of curvature of the arcuately curved surface of the light-emitting lens portion. In this case, the optimization of the vertical width of the light beam is achieved more easily.
Preferred embodiments according to the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
A light beam S emitted from the light-emitting lens portion 40A is adapted to diffuse (diverge) gradually in the direction of the height of the lens portion 40A (in a vertical direction) as the light beam S travels, as shown in
M=H1×(1+a×L/100) (1)
0<a≦5 (2)
H1=H2 (3)
where H1 is the height of the light-emitting lens portion 40A in millimeters, H2 is the height of the light-receiving lens portion 40B in millimeters, L is a distance between edges of the light-emitting and light-receiving lens portions 40A and 40B in millimeters, and M is a vertical width of a light beam S emitted from the light-emitting lens portion 40A as measured at the edge of the light-receiving lens portion 40B in millimeters. Specifically, the light beam S emitted from the light-emitting lens portion 40A is preferably adapted to diffuse in the direction of the height of the lens portion 40A so that the vertical width M of the light beam S is greater than 1.0 times the height H1 of the lens portion 40A and is not greater than 1.5 times the height H1 as measured at a position spaced a distance of ten times the height H1 apart from the edge of the lens portion 40A, for example. The diffusion (divergence) of the light beam S is set by adjusting a distance d from a light-emitting surface of a light-emitting core 3A to the edge of the light-emitting lens portion 40A, and the radius of curvature R of the curved lens surface 41A of the light-emitting lens portion 40A as appropriate. In this manner, the emitted light beams S are diffused in the vertical direction. This accommodates warpage or distortion, if any, in the optical waveguide W1 to achieve proper optical transmission. It should be noted that the emitted light beam S in the first preferred embodiment is diffused also in a horizontal direction (in a direction perpendicular to the height or vertical direction).
As shown in
In the light-emitting optical waveguide section A, light beams S emitted from the light source travel through the cores 3A, and exit the end surfaces of the cores 3A. Thereafter, the light beams S pass through and exit the lens portion 40A at the edge of the over cladding layer 4 in front of the end surfaces of the cores 3A. At this time, the diffusion of the light beams S in the vertical direction is optimized as described above by refraction resulting from the lens surface 41A (with reference to
In the light-receiving optical waveguide section B, on the other hand, the light beams S having traveled over the display screen of the display 11 (with reference to
Such transmission of the light beams S is done in the optical waveguide W1 shown in
Next, an example of a method of manufacturing the optical waveguide W1 will be described with reference to
First, a base 1 of a flat shape (with reference to
Then, as shown in
Next, as shown in
The material for the formation of the cores 3A and 3B used herein has a refractive index higher than that of the material for the formation of the under cladding layer 2 described above and the over cladding layer 4 to be described below (with reference to
Then, as shown in
Then, as shown in
Then, as shown in
Thereafter, the mold 20 is removed, as shown in
Thereafter, as shown in
A light beam S emitted from the light-emitting lens portion 40A is adapted to be collimated, as shown in
Preferably, the height H2 of the light-receiving lens portion 40B satisfies the following relations (4) to (6).
H2=H1×(1+a×L/100) (4)
0<a≦5 (5)
H1=M (6)
where H1 and H2 are in millimeters, L is a distance between edges of the light-emitting and light-receiving lens portions 40A and 40B in millimeters, and M is a vertical width of a light beam S emitted from the light-emitting lens portion 40A as measured at the edge of the light-receiving lens portion 40B in millimeters. Specifically, for example, when the distance L between the edges of the light-emitting and light-receiving lens portions 40A and 40B is ten times the height H1 of the light-emitting lens portion 40A, the height H2 of the light-receiving lens portion 40B is preferably greater than the height H1 of the light-emitting lens portion 40A so as to be greater than 1.0 times the height H1 and to be not greater than 1.5 times the height H1.
In the second preferred embodiment, light beams S emitted from the lens portion 40A of the light-emitting optical waveguide section A are not diffused in the vertical direction but are collimated by refraction resulting from the lens surface 41A of the lens portion 40A. Also, the height H2 of the light-receiving lens portion 40B is greater than the height H1 of the light-emitting lens portion 40A (the vertical width M of the collimated light beam S). This enables the light-receiving lens portion 40B to lie within the light-receiving region if warpage or distortion occurs in the optical waveguide W2. Thus, the position of a portion of the display screen of the display 11 touched with a finger is accurately detected in the touch panel 10 (with reference to
In the first and second preferred embodiments, the photosensitive resin is used to form the under cladding layer 2. However, in place of the photosensitive resin, a resin film functioning as the under cladding layer 2 may be prepared and used as it is as the under cladding layer 2. Alternatively, in place of the under cladding layer 2, a substrate with a metal film formed on the surface thereof may be used as a body having a surface on which the cores 3A and 3B are to be formed.
Although the optical waveguides W1 and W2 are in the form of the rectangular frame in the first and second preferred embodiments, each of the optical waveguides W1 and W2 in the form of the rectangular frame may be divided into the two L-shaped optical waveguide sections constituting each of the optical waveguides W1 and W2. A manufacturing method thereof may include the step of cutting the under cladding layer 2 together with the base 1 into two L-shaped sections in place of the step of cutting the under cladding layer 2 together with the base 1 into the shape of the rectangular frame. Further, at least one of the two L-shaped optical waveguide sections may be subdivided into linear optical waveguide sections constituting the at least one section.
Also, the optical waveguides W1 and W2 in the first and second preferred embodiments are used after being stripped from the base 1. However, the optical waveguides W1 and W2 still provided on the surface of the base 1 may be used without being stripped therefrom.
Next, an inventive example of the pre sent invention will be described in conjunction with a comparative example. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the inventive example.
A ray tracing simulation was performed using optical simulation software known as “LIGHTTOOLS” available from Optical Research Associates. Settings of a simulation model of a light-emitting optical waveguide section were as follows:
Over cladding layer: a refractive index of 1.50; a thickness of 1 mm; and a lens portion height of 1 mm.
Cores: a refractive index of 1.57; a thickness of 50 μm; and a width of 15 μm.
Under cladding layer: a refractive index of 1.50; and a thickness of 15 μm.
Distance of 4.04 mm from light-emitting surfaces of the cores to an edge of a lens portion.
In the simulation model, when the radius of curvature R of a curved lens surface of the lens portion was 1.4 mm (when Sample 1 having R=1.4 mm was prepared), light beams emitted from the curved lens surface were not diffused in a vertical direction but were collimated (so as to have a vertical width of 1 mm). When the radius of curvature R was 1.5 mm and 1.6 mm (when Sample 2 having R=1.5 mm and Sample 3 having R=1.6 mm were prepared), light beams emitted from the curved lens surface were diffused in the vertical direction. The vertical widths of the light beams in Samples 2 and 3 were 1.2 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively, as measured at a position spaced a distance of 10 mm apart from the edge of the lens portion.
A light-receiving surface (having a height of 1 mm and a width of 20 mm) corresponding to a light-receiving lens portion was set at a position 100 mm ahead of the edge of the lens portion in the simulation model.
[Optical Transmission Loss Resulting from Warpage]
The optical transmission loss at the light-receiving surface was simulated, while the lens portion in the simulation model was inclined upwardly and downwardly with respect to a horizontal direction (with an inclination angle of 0 degrees). The lens portion was inclined upwardly and downwardly to an angle of six degrees in steps of one degree.
The result was that the optical transmission loss increased as the inclination angle increased in Samples 1 to 3. However, Sample 1 in which the emitted light beams were collimated light beams was smaller in the increase in optical transmission loss than Samples 2 and 3 in which the emitted light beams were diffused.
[First Optical Transmission Loss Resulting from Vertical Misregistration]
The simulation model was held in a horizontal position. In this state, the optical transmission loss at the light-receiving surface was simulated, while the light-receiving surface was moved upwardly. The light-receiving surface was moved upwardly to a distance of 1.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm.
The result was that the optical transmission loss increased as the amount of movement of the light-receiving surface increased in Samples 1 to 3. However, Sample 1 in which the emitted light beams were collimated light beams was smaller in the increase in optical transmission loss than Samples 2 and 3 in which the emitted light beams were diffused.
The result shows that an optical waveguide for a touch panel in which emitted light beams are diffused in the vertical direction is capable of causing light beams emitted from the light-emitting lens portion to sufficiently enter a light-receiving optical waveguide section if warpage or distortion occurs in the optical waveguide itself.
[Second Optical Transmission Loss Resulting from Vertical Misregistration]
The simulation model in Sample 1 in which the emitted light beams were collimated light beams was held in a horizontal position, and the light-receiving surface was moved 0.1 mm upwardly. In this state, the illuminance of light beams received by the light-receiving surface was simulated, while the height (vertical width) of the light-receiving surface was increased from 1.0 mm to 2.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm. Also, the light-receiving surface was moved 0.1 mm downwardly. In this state, the illuminance of light beams received by the light-receiving surface was simulated, while the height of the light-receiving surface was increased in a similar manner.
The result was that the illuminance of the light beams received by the light-receiving surface increased as the height of the light-receiving surface increased in either case.
The result shows that an optical waveguide for a touch panel in which the height of the light-receiving lens portion is greater than that of the light-emitting lens portion is capable of causing light beams emitted from the light-emitting lens portion to sufficiently enter the light-receiving optical waveguide section if warpage or distortion occurs in the optical waveguide itself.
Although specific forms of embodiments of the instant invention have been described above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings in order to be more clearly understood, the above description is made by way of example and not as a limitation to the scope of the instant invention. It is contemplated that various modifications apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art could be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
The optical waveguide for a touch panel is applicable to an optical waveguide for use as a detection means (a position sensor) for detecting a finger touch position and the like in a touch panel.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010-183230 | Aug 2010 | JP | national |