This invention relates to an optically variable element, in particular a security element which can be employed e.g. for a data carrier.
Data carriers, such as value documents and identity documents, or objects of value, such as branded articles, are often provided for safeguarding purposes with an optically variable element which permits a test of the authenticity of the data carrier and at the same time serves as protection from unauthorized reproduction. For this purpose, the optically variable element has an optical effect which for example varies upon a change of viewing direction and cannot be copied with conventional copiers.
On these premises, the invention is based on the object of specifying an optically variable element, in particular a security element, which offers high forgery-proothess along with good recognizability and easy verifiability.
This object is achieved by an optically variable element, in particular security element, having a transparent carrier layer, an at least partly transparent reflective layer which is formed on the carrier layer, and a transparent embedding layer which is formed on the reflective layer, the reflective layer being structured in a motif region such that said layer forms a multiplicity of partly transparent micromirrors which present a perceptible motif upon plan viewing of the motif region due to specular reflection of incident light, and the refractive indices of the carrier layer and of the embedding layer differing in the visible spectrum by no more than 0.2 in order that the motif perceptible in plan view is not recognizable upon transmission viewing of the motif region.
Thus, a viewer is provided with the surprising effect that he recognizes a motif in plan view but this motif disappears for him in transmission view. This optical effect can be designated as a transmissive “anti-watermark”.
In the element according to the invention, the refractive indices of the carrier layer and of the embedding layer can differ in the visible spectrum by no more than 0.1, and in particular by no more than 0.05. In this case the disappearance of the motif in transmission view can be readily ensured.
Disappearance of the motif in transmission view is understood here to mean in particular that e.g. even an image located a certain distance behind the optically variable element is visible largely undistorted through the motif region while the motif perceptible in plan view is virtually no longer recognizable. The refractive effects of the partly transparent micromirrors in transmission view thus lead to no recognizability of the motif according to the invention. This is obtained through the very similar refractive indices of the carrier layer and of the embedding layer, through which the transmitted light undergoes a slight lateral offset through refraction on the partly transparent micromirrors, but the direction of propagation of the light is not, or not noticeably, changed. The motif region acts virtually like a plane-parallel plate in transmission view.
In the optically variable element, the upper side of the embedding layer facing away from the reflective layer can fail to follow the relief of the micromirrors. Particularly preferably, the upper side is of plane configuration. This leads to protection from unwanted casting and thus unwanted copying of the optically variable element. Likewise, the underside of the carrier layer facing away from the reflective layer can fail to follow the relief of the micromirrors.
Further, in the optically variable element according to the invention, the reflective layer can be a dielectric layer whose refractive index differs in at least a part of the visible spectrum by more than 0.2 from the refractive index of the carrier layer and from the refractive index of the embedding layer, respectively. Preferably, the difference can be >0.3, and particularly preferably >0.5.
The multiplicity of the partly transparent micromirrors can be so configured that at least two different motifs are presented upon plan viewing of the motif region from different viewing directions due to specular reflection of incident light.
Further, in the optically variable element according to the invention, the minimal lateral dimensions of the micromirrors can be >1 μm. Preferably, they lie in the region from 3 to 300 μm, in particular in the region from 4 to 50 μm, and particularly preferably in the region from 5 to 20 μm.
The micromirrors can form an at least locally periodic sawtooth grating or a facet grid. Further, it is possible that the reflective layer is present only in some regions and/or with a layer construction that is different in some regions.
Further, the reflection on the reflective layer can be at least reduced, preferably almost completely suppressed, in some regions by an antireflective relief, in particular a subwavelength grating or moth-eye structures.
Further, it is possible that the reflective layer has a layer thickness that is different in some regions.
The reflective layer can be formed by one or several high-refractive layer(s) having a refractive index of >1.7, preferably >1.8, and particularly preferably >2, at least in a part of the visible spectrum.
In the optically variable element according to the invention, the thickness of the reflective layer can be chosen such that the motif perceptible in plan view is presented in color due to interference of the light reflected on the boundary surfaces of the reflective layer.
In particular, the layer thickness z of the reflective layer can be chosen for a high reflectivity at a desired wavelength λ in the visible spectral region such that the following equation
is satisfied, where m is an integral value from 1 to 4 and nR is the refractive index of the reflective layer. Preferably, the layer thickness z of the reflective layer is so chosen that the equation for z is satisfied for m=2.
In the optically variable element according to the invention, the reflective layer(s) can have in reflection a chroma Cab*=√{square root over (a*2+b*2)} of more than 40, preferably more than 50, and particularly preferably more than 60. For rating the colors or chroma there is utilized here the CIE L*a*b* color system, an illumination with a D65 standard light source being assumed.
Further, the at least one of the reflective layers can have a layer thickness in accordance with the optical path length znR (where z is the layer thickness of the reflective layer and nR is the refractive index of the reflective layer) between 285 nm and 1755 nm, preferably between 475 nm and 1365 nm, and particularly preferably between about 500 nm and 1100 nm. When the reflective layer is formed by three layers, it is preferred that the two outer layers respectively have such an optical path length.
Further, in the optical element according to the invention, the thickness of the reflective layer can be chosen such that the motif perceptible in plan view is presented white due to interferences of the light reflected on the boundary surfaces of the reflective layer. In particular, the thickness of the reflective layer can be chosen such that the corresponding optical path length lies between 115 and 135 nm. Preferably, the optical path length amounts to 125 nm.
In the optically variable element, the reflective layer can have a three-layer construction with two outer layers and a spacer layer arranged therebetween, with the refractive indices of the outer layers being equal. In particular, the refractive indices of the outer layers can be greater than the refractive index of the spacer layer.
The optically variable element can be configured in particular as a security thread, tear thread, security band, security strip, patch or as a label for application to a data carrier, such as e.g. a security paper, value documents or the like. In particular, the optically variable element can span transparent or at least translucent regions or recesses.
The term security paper is understood here to be in particular the not yet circulable precursor to a value document, which can have besides the optically variable element according to the invention for example also further authentication features, such as e.g. luminescent substances provided within the volume. Value documents are understood here to be, on the one hand, documents manufactured from security papers. On the other hand, value documents can also be other documents or objects that can be provided with the optically variable element according to the invention in order for the value documents to have uncopiable authentication features, thereby making it possible to check authenticity and at the same time preventing unwanted copying.
There is further provided a data carrier having an optically variable element according to the invention (including its development). The data carrier can be e.g. a value document, identity document, security paper or other object of value.
There is further provided an optically variable element according to a second variant, in particular security element, having a carrier layer, a reflective layer which is formed on the carrier layer, the reflective layer having, due to its structuring, a multiplicity of micromirrors in a motif region which present a perceptible motif upon plan viewing of the motif region due to specular reflection of incident light, and the thickness of the reflective layer being so chosen that the motif perceptible in plan view is presented in color or chromatically, in particular in a single color, due to interference of the light reflected on the boundary surfaces of the reflective layer.
Such an optically variable element according to the second variant enables an excellent colored representation to be realized.
In the optically variable element according to the second variant, the layer thickness z of the reflective layer can be chosen for a desired wavelength 2 such that the following equation
is satisfied, where m is an integral value from 1 to 4 and nR is the refractive index of the reflective layer. In particular, the above equation for z can be satisfied for m=2.
The optically variable element according to the second variant can be developed in the same way as the above-described optically variable element in which the motif region also enables a transmission view. The optically variable element according to the second variant can also enable a transmission view, but it can also be configured such that no undistorted transmission view or no transmission view at all is possible.
In particular, the optically variable element according to the second variant can have a transparent embedding layer which is formed on the reflective layer.
Further, the reflective layer can be configured as a single reflective layer. However, it is also possible that the reflective layer is multilayered.
The reflective layer(s) can have in reflection a chroma Cab*=√{square root over (a*2+b*2)} of more than 40, preferably more than 50, and particularly preferably more than 60.
Further, at least one of the reflective layers can have a layer thickness in accordance with an optical path length znR (z=layer thickness, nR=refractive index of the reflective layer) between 285 nm and 1755 nm, preferably between 475 nm and 1365 nm, and particularly preferably between about 500 nm and 1100 nm. When the reflective layer is formed by three layers, the outer two will preferably have such a layer thickness in accordance with the stated optical path length.
It will be appreciated that the hereinabove mentioned features and those to be explained hereinafter can be used not only in the stated combinations, but also in other combinations or in isolation, without going beyond the scope of the present invention.
Hereinafter the invention will be explained more closely by way of example with reference to the attached drawings, which also disclose features essential to the invention. For clarity's sake the representation in the figures is not true to scale or to proportion. There are shown:
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in the schematic representation in
To enable this effect to be provided, the optically variable element 1, as to be seen best in the schematic sectional representation in
The transparent carrier layer 5, in the embodiment described here, is a transparent embossing lacquer (e.g. a thermoplastic or radiation-curing lacquer) in which the structure of a multiplicity of micromirrors 8 is embossed, this structuring being coated with the partly transparent reflective layer 6 to form the desired micromirrors 8. In the exemplary embodiment described here, a single reflective layer 6 is formed. However, it is also possible to form several transparent reflective layers one over the other.
The reflective layer 6 (or reflective layers) is (are) preferably a dielectric layer (or dielectric layers). These layers can be applied to the structured carrier layer 5 by a thin-film method, such as e.g. electron-beam vaporization or sputtering.
To minimize unwanted diffraction effects, the minimal lateral dimensions of the micromirrors 8 here are greater, and preferably considerably greater, than the maximal wavelength of the visible light. Visible light is understood here in particular to be electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength region of 380 to 780 nm. Preferably, the minimal lateral dimensions of the micromirrors 8 hence amount to at least 3 μm, preferably at least 5 μm, and particularly preferably at least 10 μm. The maximal embossing heights of the structuring in the transparent carrier layer 5 can amount to less than 20 μm, preferably less than 10 μm, and particularly preferably less than 4 μm. This makes it readily possible to embed the micromirrors 8 in a layered composite that is as thin as possible.
The micromirrors 8 can be arranged in a regular grid or also irregularly. Further, it is possible that the micromirrors 8 also form an at least locally periodic sawtooth grating.
The structuring of the carrier layer 5 and thus the arrangement of the micromirrors 8 is so chosen that a motif (here the star 4) is perceptible to a viewer in a planar motif region of the optically variable element 1 upon plan viewing of the motif region (at a viewing direction B1 and an incident light direction L1 according to
Because the transparent carrier layer 5 and the transparent embedding layer 7 have the same refractive index in the exemplary embodiment described here, the changes of direction through refraction of the incident light on the boundary surface between the upper side of the reflective layer 6 and the carrier layer 5, on the one hand, and on the boundary surface between the underside of the reflective layer 6 and the transparent embedding layer 7, on the other hand, cancel each other out, so that in transmission the light L1 is only horizontally offset (direction of double arrow P1). But the transmitted light ray retains its direction of propagation. Because the horizontal offset is extremely small and the direction of propagation is retained, the micromirrors 8 are practically no longer recognizable in transmission view. The security element 1 according to the invention acts in transmission view like a transparent (possibly slightly milky) window, so that a viewer can recognize e.g. a structured background through this window, but no longer sees the star 4.
Hence, according to the invention, the carrier layer 5 and the embedding layer 7 are so chosen that their refractive indices are equal or differ by no more than 0.2 in the visible spectrum, because up to this difference of the refractive indices the described effect of the window in transmission view is reliably obtained.
The optically variable element 1 according to the invention thus virtually has an “anti-watermark effect”, because a motif (here the star 4) is visible in plan view and the motif is no longer visible and thus disappears in transmission view. This optical effect of the optically variable element 1 according to the invention can also be designated a transmissive “anti-watermark”.
In the embodiment described here, the layer thickness of the reflective layer 6 is so chosen with consideration of its refractive index that the star 4 appears in color in plan view. For this purpose, it is preferred that the refractive index of the partly transparent reflective layer 6 deviates as strongly as possible from the refractive index of the carrier layer 5. The deviation can amount to for example more than 0.2, preferably more than 0.4, and particularly preferably more than 0.6. Because embossing lacquers which can be employed for the transparent carrier layer 5 often have a refractive index of 1.5 in practice, it is easier to apply a partly transparent reflective layer 6 with a considerably higher, rather than considerably lower, refractive index. Hence, it is preferred that the refractive index of the reflective layer is at least 1.7, preferably at least 1.9, and particularly preferably greater than 2.
Hence, it is assumed for the present embodiment as well as for the subsequent embodiments that the refractive index nL of the transparent carrier layer 5 amounts to 1.5, and the refractive index nR of the partly transparent reflective layer 6 to 2.5.
The transparent embedding layer 7 has not only its function for the “anti-watermark effect” but also serves to protect from mechanical and/or chemical stress and in particular from unauthorized casting. Hence, the surface of the embedding layer 7 facing away from the reflective layer 6 is preferably of flat configuration.
As shown in the representation of
Constructive interference and an accordingly high reflectance of the light reflected on the boundary surfaces of the reflective layer 6 occurs when the reflected light rays have a path difference of m2, where λ designates the wavelength of the light and m is an integer. The path difference at a thickness z of the reflective layer 6 results from twice the optical path length through the reflective layer 6 2nRz as well as a phase jump of λ/2 which occurs here on the upper boundary surface (transition from the optically thinner medium to an optically thicker one). There thus results for the constructive interference the following condition:
To find a layer thickness suitable for the wavelength λ one can solve the above condition for z, obtaining the following equation 1:
Because z must obviously be positive, it must hold that m≧0.
The fact that the reflective layer 6 has a reflection maximum at the wavelength of a certain color through constructive interference does not alone suffice to produce a representation with high chroma, however. This shall be illustrated hereinafter by calculated reflection spectra and color values. For rating the colors or chroma there is utilized here the CIE L*a*b* color system, an illumination with a D65 standard light source being assumed. The color value L* represents lightness, while a* and b* state the color location on a red-to-green and blue-to-yellow axis, respectively.
In the described embodiment, the reflective layer 6 is optimized to as high a chroma as possible in the green. For this purpose one can choose the layer thickness z in the above formula for z such that constructive interference results for example at a wavelength of 530 nm. Assuming nR 2.5, there result layer thicknesses z of 53 nm, 159 nm, 265 nm, 371 nm and 477 nm for m=0, 1, 2, 3, 4.
In
For quantifying the chroma, L*a*b* color values or the chroma Cab*=√{square root over (a*2+b*2)} (hereinafter also designated simply as C*) were calculated from these reflection spectra at D65 standard illumination.
Particularly chromatic colors thus result for m between 1 and 4, in particular for m=2 and m=3. For reasons of cost, in particular the thinner layer with m=2 is of interest here. In view of the total visible spectrum between 380 nm and 780 nm, in particular those layer thicknesses z are of thus of interest here for which the equation 1 with 2 between 380 nm and 780 nm and m between 1 and 4 holds. Preferably, m lies between 2 and 3. This corresponds to an optical path length znR between 285 nm and 1755 nm, preferably between 475 nm and 1365 nm. Taking into consideration further that the human eye is rather insensitive at the edge of this spectrum, the preferred region of the optical path length can even be defined somewhat more narrowly and set approximately between 500 nm and 1100 nm.
In contrast to the reflection spectra shown in
Because the reflective layer 6 appears like a simple transparent foil in transmission view in the motif region in the described optically variable element 1, not only does the motif (the star 4) previously seen in reflection disappear for a viewer, but the color of the foil also differs from that of the motif seen in reflection, i.e. the foil then appears largely colorless or in a different color. This is an especially striking and memorable effect for a viewer, which is very well suited for security features.
Chromaticity and lightness of the motif 4 visible in reflection can be further improved over the hitherto described embodiment with the single reflective layer by utilizing several reflective layers instead of only a single reflective layer 6.
It has proved to be especially advantageous here to use threefold layers with two high-refractive layers 16 and 18 and an interjacent spacer layer 17. A schematic sectional representation of such a threefold reflective layer 19 is represented in
The spacer layer 17 here can have for example a refractive index that corresponds to that of the carrier layer 5 and/or of the embedding layer 7 or is very similar thereto. In the embodiment described here, the spacer layer has a refractive index of 1.5. The thickness of the spacer layer 17 is again to be chosen such that constructive interference of the portions reflected on its upper side and on its underside occurs. By way of example a thickness of λ/(4nL)=88 nm is chosen here.
As indicated by
In
The maximal reflectance R (here again for 530 nm) for the optically variable element 1 according to
The structure of the reflective layer 19 as a threefold layer with two high-refractive layers 16 and 18 and the interjacent spacer layer 17 is thus extremely advantageous, because a considerable increase in quality over a single reflective layer 6 can be obtained with relatively little additional effort upon manufacture.
In the hitherto described embodiments, an optimization was respectively carried out with regard to the reflection in the green. This is not any restriction of course. The concept according to the invention is also transferable or applicable to other colors.
Thus, in
As indicated by the representations of
At this point it should be noted that the colors visible in plan view can also depend on the angle of reflection and have a shift effect. High-refractive reflective layers show lower color shift than low-refractive reflective layers. Depending on the application, a clear color-shift effect may be wanted or unwanted. The refractive index of the reflective layer can be chosen in dependence thereon, for example.
Further, the layer thickness of the reflective layer 6 can also be optimized in terms of a representation as white as possible, rather than in terms of an especially chromatic representation. In
Through the employment of two reflective layers 16 and 18 with a thickness of about 50 nm and a refractive index of 2.5, which are separated by a spacer layer 17 with a refractive index of 1.5 and a thickness of 88 nm, the lightness can also be once again considerably increased in a structure according to
The partly transparent reflective layer 6 as well as the high-refractive layers 16 and 18 can be realized in particular by high-refractive dielectrics, such as e.g. TiO2 or ZnS For the spacer layer 17 with a lower refractive index there can be employed for example SiO2 or MgF2.
For the optical effect, primarily the differences in refractive index are significant and not so much the absolute values. Instead of high-refractive reflective layers 6, 16, 18 in a low-refractive lacquer 5, 7, there can in principle also be utilized low-refractive reflective layers in high-refractive lacquers. Thus, the prior art discloses in particular lacquers with a refractive index of 1.8 which could be coated for example with a reflective layer of MgF2. The spacer layer could then be a high-refractive layer of for example ZnS. Furthermore, dielectric polymers can also be used as a reflective layer(s) or spacer layer(s).
Further, the micromirrors 8 can be coated with different reflective layers in some regions. In particular, the reflective layers can be left out and/or be present in different layer thickness in some regions. This makes it possible to realize in particular also multicolor views and/or a change between views with different colors. One way of realizing reflective layers differing in some regions is to use washing methods by which for example a washing ink is first printed on the embossing lacquers, or on lower reflective layers that might already be present, the reflective layer is then vapor-deposited over the full area, and the washing ink is subsequently washed off again, thereby likewise removing the coating on the regions previously covered with the washing ink.
The optically variable element 1 according to the invention can show a multiplicity of different optical effects. The optical effects can contain for example a 3D bulge, a 3D stereogram, (multi-)shift images and/or kinematic effects.
In order for arbitrary motifs to be representable such that no negative image becomes visible in plan view from certain directions, the reflective layer 6 can for example be left out in some regions. As an alternative to leaving out parts of the reflective layer 6, an antireflection structure (not shown), in particular subwavelength grating or moth-eye structures, can be embossed, instead of the micromirrors 8, in regions that are not to light up brightly in plan view from any of the possible viewing directions RA-RC. Such a method is especially advantageous, because no additional working steps are necessary for leaving out parts of the reflective layer, and antireflection structures can be embossed with high resolution in exact register beside micromirrors 8 in the same working operation.
The optically variable element according to the invention can be used in particular in a transparent region of a value document, in particular a bank note. Alternatively, it can also be placed on a light or dark background, however. Against a dark background the representations appear especially light and rich in contrast in plan view. Because a dark background cannot be integrated into every bank-note design, however, the optically variable element 1 can be configured such that the motif is perceptible so light in plan view that it is still sufficiently striking against a background that is white or printed with an arbitrary motif.
The optically variable element 1 according to the invention can also be configured as a security thread. Further, it is possible to configure the optically variable element 1 directly on the value document. Thus, there can be carried out a direct printing with subsequent embossing of the optically variable element 1 onto a polymer substrate to configure a security element according to the invention on plastic bank notes, for example. The optically variable element 1 according to the invention can be configured in a great variety of substrates. In particular, it can be configured in or on a paper substrate, a paper with synthetic fibers, i.e. paper with a share x of polymeric material in the range of 0<x<100 wt. %, a plastic foil, e.g. a foil of polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polypropylene (PP) or polyamide (PA), or a multilayer composite, in particular a composite of several different foils (compound composite) or a paper/foil composite (foil/paper/foil or paper/foil/paper), whereby the optically variable element can be provided in or on or between each of the layers of such a multilayer composite.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 108 242 | Jul 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/003059 | 7/19/2012 | WO | 00 | 1/15/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/010672 | 1/24/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4012843 | Harada et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4184700 | Greenaway | Jan 1980 | A |
4484797 | Knop et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4568141 | Antes | Feb 1986 | A |
4838648 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4892385 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4984824 | Antes et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5032003 | Antes | Jul 1991 | A |
5101184 | Antes | Mar 1992 | A |
5105306 | Ohala | Apr 1992 | A |
5106125 | Antes | Apr 1992 | A |
5301062 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5335113 | Jackson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5428479 | Lee | Jun 1995 | A |
5770120 | Kamihara et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5825547 | Lee | Oct 1998 | A |
5909313 | Lee | Jun 1999 | A |
6088161 | Lee | Jul 2000 | A |
6157487 | Staub et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6226127 | Dunn et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6342969 | Lee | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6870678 | Tompkin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6975438 | Schilling et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987590 | Phillips et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7106516 | Lotz et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7281810 | Lee | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7517578 | Raksha et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7630954 | Adamczyk et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7699350 | Heim | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7719733 | Schilling et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8149511 | Kaule et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187771 | Staub et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8400495 | Kaule | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8632100 | Kaule et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010041307 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20040032659 | Drinkwater | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057113 | Tompkin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050068624 | Schilling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050127663 | Heim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179254 | Heim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050270604 | Drinkwater | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070183045 | Schilling et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070246933 | Heim et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291362 | Hill et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080160226 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080231976 | Commander et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250954 | Depta et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258456 | Rahm et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259456 | Schilling et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090008923 | Kaule et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090091834 | Ryzi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090162756 | Staub et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100001508 | Tompkin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045024 | Attner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100177094 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182221 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194532 | Kaule | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208036 | Kaule | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110012337 | Heim | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018252 | Petry et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
738289 | Sep 2001 | AU |
2003283372 | Jun 2004 | AU |
2009278275 | Feb 2010 | AU |
1193299 | Sep 1998 | CN |
100534807 | Sep 2009 | CN |
100567022 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101610907 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101883826 | Nov 2010 | CN |
101959696 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102112896 | Jun 2011 | CN |
25 55 214 | Jun 1977 | DE |
195 06 880 | Aug 1996 | DE |
10129939 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10 2004 017 094 | Nov 2005 | DE |
10 2005 025 095 | Dec 2006 | DE |
10 2005 027 380 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102005061749 | Jul 2007 | DE |
102006016139 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102008013167 | Sep 2009 | DE |
102008046128 | Mar 2010 | DE |
0 105 099 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0 227 423 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0 330 738 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0 375 833 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 429 782 | Jun 1991 | EP |
1547807 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 580 020 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 658 992 | May 2006 | EP |
S57-208514 | Dec 1982 | JP |
S59-12403 | Jan 1984 | JP |
S60-8802 | Jan 1985 | JP |
2008-0 80 609 | Apr 2008 | JP |
9007133 | Jun 1990 | WO |
9008338 | Jul 1990 | WO |
9103747 | Mar 1991 | WO |
9318419 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9428444 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9716772 | May 1997 | WO |
9719821 | Jun 1997 | WO |
9734170 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9820382 | May 1998 | WO |
9823979 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9853999 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9965699 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0013916 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0180175 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0206858 | Jan 2002 | WO |
03068525 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2005042268 | May 2005 | WO |
2006013215 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006087138 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006125224 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007076952 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2009000527 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009000528 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fuhse, “Combination of Micro Mirrors and Thin Film Color Shift,” 2014 Optical Document Security Conference, San Francisco, California, USA, Jan. 29-31, 2014, 8 pages. |
International Search Report from Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/007369, dated Jun. 7, 2011 and English Translation thereof. |
International Search Report from Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/007368, dated Jun. 8, 2011 and English Translation thereof. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/007369, dated Jun. 5, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/007368, dated Jul. 10, 2012. |
Chinese Search Report from Application No. CN 2012800359032, Dec. 2, 2014. |
Kotacka et al., “Synthetic holography at 500.000 dpi: From renaissance of portraits to holographic dust”, Optical Document Security, San Francisco, Jan. 23-25, 2008, Reconnaissance International 2008, pp. 1-13. |
Lee, “Micro mirror array nanostructures for anti-counterfeiting applications”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, SPIE vol. 5310 c. 2004, pp. 350-368. |
Lee, “Colourtone lithography”, Mircroelectronic Engineering 61-62 (2002) pp. 105-111. |
Leech et al., “Hot embossing of grating-based optically variable images in thermoplastic arcrylic lacquer”, Jouran of Materials Science, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007, 7 pages. |
Leech et al., “Optically variable micro-mirror arrays fabricated by graytone lithography”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 83 (2006) pp. 351-356. |
Leech et al., “Printing via hot embossing of optically variable images in thermoplastic acrylic lacquer”, Mircoelectronic Engineering vol. 83 (2006) pp. 1961-1965. |
Leech et al., “Hot embossing of diffractive optically variable images in biaxially-oriented polypropylene”, Mircroelectronic Engineering vol. 84 (2007) pp. 25-30. |
van Renesse, “7.2.5 Volume-Reflection Holography” Optical Document Securtiy, Third Edition (2005) pp. 250-252. |
Chinese Search Report from Application No. CN 2010800625972, Apr. 21, 2014. |
Australian Opposition Proceeding from Application No. 20100327031, Oct. 17, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140160568 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |