Security documents such as banknotes now frequently carry optically variable devices (OVDs) such as diffraction gratings or holographic optical microstructures as a security feature against copy and counterfeit. This has been motivated by the progress in the fields of computer based desktop publishing and scanning which renders conventional security print technologies such as intaglio and offset printing increasingly susceptible to counterfeit. A particularly good way to strengthen security documents against counterfeit is to combine security print with optically variable diffractive devices whose structures are non-copiable by scanners and which can exhibit optically variable effects such as colour changes by diffraction, apparent runs, kinetic movement effects, animation and distinct switches between images. A particularly advantageous effect is where the OVD produces a movement effect. Such effects are both pleasing to the eye and easily understood by the viewer and as a consequence enhance the security of the device.
Several such classes of diffractive based security devices exist.
There are two distinct approaches to producing a diffractive OVD. The first approach is focused on producing complex 2D surface diffraction gratings. Typically these approaches are provided by E-beam e.g. Exelgram™, Dot Matrix and its variants e.g. Aegis, or specialised proprietary techniques such as those used to produce the Kinegram™. The “Exelgram™” was developed by CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Australia and the Kinegram™ was developed by Landis and Gyr, Switzerland. These are described in WO-A-93/18419, WO-A-95/04948 and WO-A-95/02200 for the Exelgram™ and U.S. Pat. No. 4,761,253 and EP-A-0105099 for the Kinegram1υ. Both of these techniques use directly written localised surface diffraction gratings, which in the case of the Exelgram™ is by an electron beam direct write process and in the case of a Kinegram™ is by the recombining step and repeat process outlined in U.S. Pat. No. 4,761,253.
Both of these techniques enable one precise diffraction grating to be written into a particular area. In the case of WO-A-95/02200, a device is disclosed displaying two angularly separated but overlapping diffracted images made from two completely overlapping diffraction grating areas while WO-A-95/04948 details a diffraction grating device made from a series of tracks of diffraction grating structures that exhibits a clearly switching image where the separate images can occupy overlapping areas. Both of these devices have been used for applications on security documents such as banknotes. In both examples such switching effects, if incorporated into the design in the appropriate manner, can give rise to movement effects.
The second approach to producing OVDs is based around what is more conventionally referred to as the holographic process which inherently involves the interference of two coherent light beams, one of which is modified by or carries information relating to an object e.g. object beam. Examples of this approach are the conventional Benton H1/H2 transfer techniques e.g. rainbow holography or the sophisticated masking techniques used to produce 2D-diffractive images such as the Alphagram™, Moviegram™, the latter is sometimes referred to as interferential lithography.
The first approach, as described earlier, which we shall refer to as digital exposure techniques, is inherently suited to producing animation or kinetic movement effects e.g. expanding line patterns and linear graphical movement patterns. These movement or animation effects are intended, from a security point of view, to substitute for the inability of digital exposure techniques to create 3D depth effects. Such 3D depth effects are characteristic of holographic processes used to produce conventional holograms.
A particularly secure form of animation is that in which the movement of the light pattern on the surface of the device appears essentially continuous. Now given that the direction of diffraction/redirection experienced by a light ray incident upon a point on the surface of a security device is defined by the pitch and groove orientation of the grating microstructure at that point, it therefore follows that the generation of said continuously moving light pattern requires a special grating distribution within the region defined by the light pattern which varies continuously (or near continuously) in pitch and orientation. Such a continuously varying spatial grating distribution is known within the parlance of optoelectronics as a “chirped” grating distribution. It must also be appreciated that if the chirped grating distribution acts as to predominantly diffract or redirect light of a particular wavelength or colour when generating the moving light pattern then the grating distribution will vary predominantly in the orientation rather than the pitch (or its inverse, spatial frequency used defined in terms of lines per mm).
In extremis, for this case of a movement locus of essentially single colour, the grating distribution may contain no spatial variation in pitch/spatial frequency. Conversely if the grating distribution acts also to create a light pattern which exhibits a progressive colour change as it evolves then the grating distribution will have a spatial variation which is predominantly due to progressive changes in grating pitch, and in extremis may contain no variation in the grating orientation.
In respect of the digital exposure methods those that utilise a vector phase writing or exposure process are to be preferred i.e. Kinegram™. The current invention is concern with an improved method for producing continuous movement effects using the conventional H1/H2 holographic process, thus enabling the holographer to combine the security benefits of kinetic movement effects with the 3D parallax effects that are ordinarily available using this technique.
It is known that it is possible to create simple movement and animation effects with the combination of multiple artwork masks and a corresponding number of exposures of each artwork mask into an intermediate silver halide H1. However if the movement sequence contains, for example, a dozen distinct graphical elements the application of this process becomes very time consuming.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, a method of recording an optically variable security device comprises exposing an object to a coherent beam of diffuse light; causing the resultant light to interfere with a reference beam and recording the resultant interference pattern on or in a record medium characterised in that an aperture mask is located upstream or downstream of the object with respect to the direction of the diffuse light beam such that different parts of the object are imaged on to respective different, non-overlapping parts of the record medium.
The current invention seeks to overcome the problems set out above and further provides two essential benefits.
Some examples of optically variable security devices and methods for their manufacture in accordance with the invention will now be described and contrasted with known examples with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Before considering the detailed construction of such a device it is pertinent to consider the Benton Rainbow H1/H2 recording and transfer process, beyond this brief introduction further detail can be found in “Practical Holography” by G. Saxby.
Shown in
The relative motion of different parts of a 3-dimensional object as an observer changes his viewing perspective or angle in the horizontal (left- to-right) plane is known as parallax. Hence in a Benton H1 the slits are elongated along the horizontal parallax axis. The elemental hologram strips or slits, which we find convenient to refer to as Benton Slits are restricted to be narrow in the object or artwork vertical axis thus sacrificing vertical parallax. This loss of vertical parallax is compensated by that fact this elemental Benton slit hologram during the subsequent transfer stage will record a component of the resulting H2 image which replays a near pure Rainbow colour under white light illumination.
Let us consider the transfer process in more detail with reference to
It should be appreciated that the component rays emanating from each Benton slit make or form a different angle with the reference beam and thus record an interference beam and hence microstructure of a different pitch or spatial frequency. The larger the inter-beam angle the higher the spatial frequency (e.g. smaller the groove spacing or pitch) of the interference pattern/microstructure. Hence each Benton slit will also, in addition to providing horizontal parallax, provide an image component within the H2 which when illuminated by white light will reply a particular Rainbow colour into the observers eye, which differs form that provided by the other Benton slits present.
In
So far we have inferred that the Benton slits are orientated to capture horizontal depth related to parallax effects. However the Benton slits may be used to record graphical movement or animation effects (e.g. stereograms are a refined example) by subdividing the slit into regions, with each region recording a particular graphical component of the movement sequence. We illustrate the principles of this recording process by reference to
The H1 4 is then illuminated by a beam of light which is a conjugate of the H1 recording beam thus reconstructing a real holographic image in space. A second beam of non-diffuse coherent light, which is generally provided in the form of a simple collimated or spherical wave front and is known in the art as the H2 recording reference beam is allowed to interfere with the holographic image provided by the H1. A recording medium (typically photoresist) is then placed in the region where the holographic image provided by the H1 overlap and thus interfere. The holographic interference pattern is thus recorded into the photosensitive material to create what is known in the art as the H2 hologram.
In the
An example of artwork that might be used is shown in
The example above will generate an image that moves as the viewing angle changes, indeed the image will appear to move in the same direction as the change in viewing angle.
It is also possible to use the current invention to make an image move in the opposite direction to the change in viewing angle.
A second embodiment of the invention overcomes the problem of multiple exposures and again relies upon the inclusion of an aperture.
So far we have only concerned ourselves with the H1 generation process. However it is generally envisaged that this invention can be provided within the media of an embossed hologram or optically variable device (OVD) and therefore it is necessary to consider the H2 generation process. This involves illuminating the H1 containing, in addition to conventional artwork/object recordings, at least one of the previous embodiments.
An alternative approach is to encode a number of H1 intermediates and expose them in a non-overlapping manner on to the H2. In practice this is again labour intensive and consequently limiting to the complexity of an image that can be formed. A third embodiment of the current invention seeks to overcome the labour intensive nature of this process and allow for more complex, bright images to be produced.
It has now been recognised that an aperture can be used to enable multiple images to be exposed simultaneously and in such a manner as to create a movement or animation effect.
By way of further highlighting the benefits of the current inventions a number of further enhancements will now be highlighted. So far we have only discussed the possibility of creating a simple linear structure essentially comprising a single graphical element with a single movement effect. Several graphical elements may be combined in a single OVD.
If the holographer wished they may use two or more exposures to create very visually striking effects where different elements have opposing movement effects. To achieve this the holographer would expose a first set of image elements according to embodiment one of the current invention via their associated apertures ensuring to mask those image elements and associated apertures he does not want exposed. The holographer would then make a second exposure according to the second embodiment of the current invention this time exposing those elements via their associated apertures not exposed during the first exposure and ensuring those elements already exposed and their associated apertures are masked off.
So far we have only considered introducing movement and animation effects which manifest themselves to the observer as a “band of light” of essentially constant colour which progressively moves through either a linear or curvilinear path which is supported by either a continuous region of holographic microstructure, whose spatial frequency and groove orientation is well defined at each point within the region and wherein both parameters vary continuously and progressively along the path described by the moving band of light, or by discontinuous regions of holographic microstructure (whose shape preferably describes a recognisable graphical feature) with the microstructures spatial frequency and orientation again defined within each region and progressively varying within each region along a path as described by the moving light band.
It should be appreciated that in all such cases the angularly selecting aperture will have it's shortest dimension transverse to the horizontal object artwork and therefore parallax axis e.g. the aperture will be transverse to the largest dimension of both the artwork sequence and the conventional Benton slit. Generally in such cases where the visible diffractive effect is a movement locus of constant colour the progressive changes in groove orientation will be the factor within the grating distribution.
The inventors have also recognised that it is possible to use the current inventive method to generate smooth colour transitions. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, during the H1/H2 process movement effects are generated by varying an image elements position in the X direction H1 plane. As illustrated in
Effectively the pitch or spatial frequency of the diffraction gratings (cf
A further embodiment makes use of a pin hole aperture 9B rather than slit as previous illustrated.
It should also be appreciated that the aperture need not be limited to either a slit or a pin hole, indeed it has been found that the aperture is preferably non-rectilinear in shape, for example having curved edges as shown in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB02/03174 | 7/10/2002 | WO | 7/13/2006 |