1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to regulating the voltage of an integrated circuit that has an associated package inductance and a variable current demand.
2. Description of Background Art
High-speed microprocessors are increasingly being designed to operate at a low operating voltage and with tight tolerances on acceptable power supply voltage. In particular, individual semiconductor devices and critical logical paths must be able to withstand worst-case voltage variations.
The current demands of a high-speed microprocessor circuit may change rapidly, making it difficult to control the on-chip voltage due to the significant package inductance of a packaged microprocessor circuit. Common package inductance values limit the ability of the package inductor to respond to changes in current demand in time scales less than about 10 nanoseconds. One conventional approach to this problem is to use passive decoupling capacitors to reduce the effect of current changes on microprocessor operating voltage. However, decoupling capacitors require significant die area, particularly if they are to be scaled to permit tight voltage regulation for large, sudden variations in current demand, such as multi-cycle changes in current demand associated with changes in the current required by the microprocessor for multiple clock cycles, such as changes in logic current. Additionally, conventional decoupling capacitors may have difficulty responding to abrupt, multi-cycle changes in current demand.
Therefore what is needed is an improved method of regulating the voltage of a microprocessor associated with changes in current demand of the microprocessor.
The present invention relates to a voltage regulator for use within an integrated circuit (IC) to regulate multi-cycle voltage fluctuations in the IC having an associated package inductance that limits the rate that current from a regulated voltage source may change in response to a change in current demand of the IC. The voltage regulator sinks current when the operating voltage of the IC rises above a threshold upper trigger voltage indicative of a multicycle decrease in current demand that might lead to an overvoltage condition. The voltage regulator sources current when the operating voltage of the IC decreases below a threshold lower trigger voltage indicative of a multicycle increase in current demand that might lead to an undervoltage condition. In one embodiment, the voltage regulator includes at least two capacitors that are coupled in parallel to sink current, coupled in series to source current, and are restored to a voltage less than a target operating voltage by a voltage divider to maintain the regulator's ability to sink or source current.
The present invention generally comprises an active power stabilizer circuit for regulating the voltage of a microprocessor circuit. In a microprocessor circuit the chip performance is limited by the voltage tolerance with every device and critical path of a logical circuit needing to be operable over an entire safe operating voltage range.
APS 180 includes a voltage sensor 110 to sense a microprocessor circuit operating voltage, Vdd, and compare it to a target regulated voltage, Vdd0. A control circuit 120 determines whether Vdd is within a normal operational range. If the voltage exceeds a threshold high voltage level, Vddh=Vdd0+ΔV1, where ΔV1, is a preselected voltage difference, the control circuit triggers a bi-directional current source 130 to sink current, thereby acting to prevent the microprocessor circuit voltage from exceeding a safe upper voltage level, Vmax. However, if the voltage decreases below a threshold low voltage level, Vddl=Vdd0−ΔV2 (where ΔV2 is another preselected voltage difference, which may be equal to or different from ΔV1) the control circuit triggers the bidirectional current source 130 to source current, thereby acting to prevent the microprocessor circuit voltage from decreasing below a safe lower voltage level, Vmin. Thus current is sourced or sinked only when the operating voltage deviates beyond defined threshold (trigger) voltages. As an illustrative example, for a microprocessor circuit having a nominal operating voltage of 1.0 volts, the voltage may need to be regulated to within plus or minus 5%. Furthermore, quasi-steady state operation may include a 1% ripple associated with normal clock operation. In one example, the voltage difference may be selected to be between that associated with normal clock ripple and the maximum safe operating range, such as upper and lower voltage levels corresponding to voltage variations of plus or minus 3%.
Microprocessor circuit 230 receives power from an external power supply at node 290. A regulated off-chip voltage generated by external off chip power supply is coupled to the microprocessor circuit 230 through and is impeded by the package inductance 245 associated with a package 240. By way of example, package 240 may include various power planes for distribution to the microprocessor circuit 230 within. Additionally, the package 240 may include several input/output points, or bumps, which allow external communication with the microprocessor circuit 230. Both the power planes and the bumps create a package inductance 245.
Over sufficiently long periods of time, the voltage coupled to microprocessor circuit 230 at node 285 will be the reference voltage from the external off chip power supply. However, over sufficiently short time periods the package inductance 245 limits the ability of the external power supply to regulate the microprocessor circuit voltage in response to changes in microprocessor load current. Consequently, microprocessor circuit 230 includes at least one decoupling capacitor, such as a parasitic decoupling capacitor 202 and explicit decoupling capacitor 204. Each decoupling capacitor 202 and 204 also has an associated series resistance that limits its response time. As described below in more detail, decoupling capacitors 202 and 204 have a limited capability to regulate the microprocessor circuit voltage in response to rapidly changing microprocessor currents.
The microprocessor circuit 230 can be modeled as having a time-varying current demand associated with clock leading edge current 250, clock trailing edge current 260, and a logic current 270. The clock currents 250 and 270 are typically periodic (cyclic) during normal operation. However, the clock current and logic current may also vary abruptly in a non-periodic fashion, such as during a clock stop event or a cold-start up. The logic current may also vary during start up or other conditions. Consequently, in addition to cyclic variations in current demand, the microprocessor circuit may also have abrupt increases or decreases in current demand that persist for multiple clock cycles.
The impedance from the inductor 245 limits the rate at which the off-chip power supply can respond to abrupt changes in current demand. This can be expressed mathematically as: dI/dt=dV/L, where dI/dt is the time rate of change of the inductor current, dV is the differential voltage across the inductor 245 between nodes 285 and 290, and L is the package inductance.
In the present invention, APS 180 acts to prevent the microprocessor circuit voltage from exceeding desired safe upper and lower levels. In preferred embodiments, APS 180 is configured to act as a supplemental current source that is turned on only when the voltage at node 285 decreases below a lower trigger voltage level, Vddl , indicative of a sudden increase in current demand of the microprocessor circuit. In preferred embodiments, APS 180 is also configured to act as a supplemental current sink that is turned on only when the voltage increases above an upper trigger voltage level, Vddh, indicative of a sudden decrease in current demand of the microprocessor circuit.
Some of the benefits of the present invention may be understood with reference to
Referring to
One aspect of the present invention is that the trigger voltage levels are selected to be greater than normal cycle-to-cycle variations associated with steady-state clock operation. In the present invention, current sourcing or sinking is triggered only in response to voltage changes sufficiently large to indicate a multicycle change in current demand, such as a change in logic current required by a microprocessor. Moreover, in a preferred embodiment, the trigger voltages are selected to permit the inductor to develop a sufficient voltage to result in a large rate of change of inductor current to reach the new multicycle current level in an optimum number of cycles without exceeding safe operating voltages for the microprocessor circuit.
It is desirable that APS 180 be implemented as a compact circuit compatible with a conventional integrated circuit fabrication process such that one or more APSs 180 may be integrated onto a microprocessor. Moreover, it is desirable that APS 180 have a sufficiently fast response time that it can be used to regulate the voltage in high-speed microprocessors.
In one embodiment, bi-directional current source 450 has a bridge circuit 500 including capacitors and switches arranged in a bridge topology, as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the maintenance switches 530b, 540b, 550b, and 560b may be selectively turned on to act as resistive elements of voltage divider to restore the voltage across the capacitors to a desired level. Additionally, the resistance may be selected to restore the voltage over a time scale sufficiently large such when the voltage is being restored the APS is not a significant current source or sink with respect to the microprocessor circuit. As one example, assuming that each combined switch 530, 540, 550, 560 has the same total number of “fingers”, a preferred embodiment has 20% of the fingers of combined switches 530 and 540 used as maintenance switches 530b and 540b, while 60% of the fingers of combined switches 550, and 560 are used to form maintenance switches 550b, and 560b. In one embodiment, with all maintenance switches 530b, 540b, 550b, 560b turned on, a voltage divider is formed placing 80% of the total voltage from Vdd to ground across each capacitor 510, 520.
The bridge 500 may be configured as a current sink having capacitors coupled in parallel by turning on the switches in the second arm and fourth arm, with the bridge section switched turned off. Conversely, the bridge may be configured as a current source having capacitors coupled in series by turning on the switches in the bridge section and turning off the switches in the second arm and the fourth arm. In a maintenance state, the voltage levels at nodes 502 and 504 are brought back to an equilibrium voltage value using a shunt voltage divider formed by turning on selected “m” transistors 530b, 540b, 550b, 560b. In an idle state (not shown), the switches in the second arm, fourth arm, and bridge may be left in an off state, resulting in the voltage floating at nodes 502 and 504.
In one embodiment, an enable signal, indicates whether the APS 480 should operate to regulate the power; Em which indicates whether the Maintenance control circuit 440 should enter a maintenance state or an idle state. By switching the APS 480 from the maintenance state to the idle state, a power savings may be realized, however, APS 480 may remain in the maintenance state indefinitely without detriment to its operation.
For a high speed microprocessor circuit a sensitive, comparatively fast sensor circuit 410 to detect voltage changes requiring action along with a sufficiently fast control signal circuit 420 is desirable.
a-9d illustrate one embodiment of the threshold sensors 410. As discussed above, threshold sensors 410 monitor and compare Vdd against threshold 352 and threshold 356. Threshold sensors 410 are configured to output a threshold signal 415 consisting of V+ and V−. As illustrated in
The first differential amplifier 910, is a P-type amplifier and is used to determine whether Vdd is below the Vdd0−ΔV2, threshold 356. To accomplish the comparison, Vdd is first passed through a noise sensing “ladder” 930.
Referring to
Vmiddle(filtered) 942, Vinst(up) 932, and Vref(up) 944 are provided to first differential amplifier 910 in order to compare Vinst(up) 932 with Vmiddle(filtered) 942. Since first differential amplifier 910 is configured to be a P-type amplifier, it generates a value of “0” for V+ when Vinst(up) 932 is greater than Vmiddle(filtered) 942 and outputs a value of “1” when Vinst(up) 932 is less than Vmiddle(filtered) 942.
The second differential amplifier 920 is an N-type amplifier that is used in a complementary fashion with respect to the first differential amplifier 910 to determine whether Vdd is above Vddo+ΔV1 threshold 352. Vmiddle(filtered) 942, Vinst(low) 936, and Vref(low) 946 are provided to second differential amplifier 920 in order to compare Vinst(low) 936 with Vmiddle(filtered) 942. Second differential amplifier 920 is configured to be a N-type amplifier, and generates a value of “0” for V− when Vinst(low) 936 is greater than Vmiddle(filtered) 942 and outputs a value of “1” when Vinst(low) 936 is less than Vmiddle(filtered) 942.
First gain chain 1010 receives and processes the V− signal from second differential amplifier 920. V− is passed through a plurality of inverters to rapidly develop a high current gain in order to drive the regular switches 530a and 540a via control signals b1 and a2. Signals b1 and a2 are configured to be drawn from different inverter stages in the first gain chain 1010 such that b1 is always opposite of a2 in value. However, as noted above, switch 540a is a N-FET design and switch 530a is a P-FET design, thus b1 and a2 effectively carry the same information adapted for their associated switch.
Likewise, second gain chain 1020 receives and processes the V+ signal from first differential amplifier 910. V+ is passed through a plurality of inverters to rapidly develop a high current gain in order to drive the regular switches 550a and 560a via control signals b2 and a1. Signals b2 and a1 are configured to be drawn from different inverter stages in the second gain chain 1020 such that b2 is always opposite of a1 in value. However, as noted above, switch 550a is a N-FET design and switch 560a is a P-FET design, thus b2 and a1 effectively carry the same information adapted for their associated switch.
Both gain chains 1010, and 1020 also include enabling circuitry to disable the APS 480 if needed. As illustrated, the enabling circuitry receives {overscore (En)} 1035 and En 1040. En 1040 is an active-high enabling signal derived from Ea and {overscore (En)} 1035 is its complement. If the APS 480 is disabled (Ea=“0”), then first gain chain 1010 is configured to output a2 with a value of “1” and b1 with a value of “0”, effectively turning off both switches 530a and 540a. Similarly, if APS 480 is disabled, second gain chain 1020 is configured to output b2 with a value of “0” and a1 with a value of “1”, effectively turning off both switches 550a, and 560a.
First gain chain 1010 also generates m1 to signal maintenance control circuit 440. In the preferred embodiment, m1 holds the same value as V− assuming the APS 480 is enabled. If the APS 480 is not enabled, then m1 has a value of “1” regardless of the value of V+. Gain chain 1020 likewise generates m2 to hold the same value as V+ unless the APS 480 is disabled, at which point m2 has a value of “0”.
It will be understood that the design of APS 180 for a particular application will depend upon many factors. In particular, the response turn on/turn off characteristics of APS 180 may be selected by varying parameters associated with the threshold sensors 410 and control signal circuit. In some applications it is desirable that the APS be able to turn on within a few cycles of sensing a voltage exceeding a trigger level. The turn off response to detecting the voltage returning below the trigger level may be identical to the turn-on response, although it will be understood that the turn on/turn off response may be skewed. For example, in some embodiments, the turn-on response may be faster than the turn-off response. The high and low trigger voltages Vdd0+ΔV1, 352 and Vdd0−ΔV2, 356, for which current sourcing and sinking are activated may be selected from computer simulations, such as by determining maximum voltage ranges likely to occur for likely variations in microprocessor current demands and determining trigger voltages for particular APS implementations that turn on sufficiently soon after detecting the trigger voltage and which source/sink sufficient current to prevent unsafe voltage conditions.
The invention has been presented by way of example in terms of several specific embodiments. One skilled in the art will recognize that several alternate embodiments may exist to control the current source and maintenance circuit of the present invention. Furthermore, one skilled in the art will recognize that several topologies may exist for forming the current source and maintenance circuit. It is not intended that the invention should be limited to the embodiments discussed herein, but should instead be defined by the claims which follow.
This application is related to the U.S. patent application entitled “Four-State Switched Decoupling Capacitor System For Active Power Stabilizer,” with inventors Robert Paul Masleid, Christoper Giacomotto, and Akihiko Harada and having the same filing date as this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5608312 | Wallace | Mar 1997 | A |
5646572 | Masleid | Jul 1997 | A |
5973547 | Ang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982160 | Walters et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6028417 | Ang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6069521 | Taylor et al. | May 2000 | A |
6198325 | Ang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215290 | Yang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6333623 | Heisley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6424129 | Lethellier | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433521 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6580597 | Kanouda et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583610 | Groom et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6696825 | Harris et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20020053897 | Kajiwara et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020125871 | Groom et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040000895 | Solivan | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012425 | Hsu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040135622 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |