The present invention relates to tobramycin formulations for delivery by aerosolization.
The invention provides a tobramycin formulation for delivery by aerosolization in the form of additive-free, isotonic solution whose pH has been optimised to ensure adequate shelf-life at room temperature.
Said formulation can be advantageously used for the treatment and prophylaxis of acute and chronic endobronchial infections, in particular those caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated to lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis.
Although pressurised metered dose inhalers (MDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are the most commonly used inhalation drug delivery systems, nebulisers have become increasingly popular for the treatment of airway obstruction, particularly in young children with asthma and in patients with severe asthma or chronic airflow obstruction. Nebulisers use ultrasound or compressed gas to produce aerosol droplets in the respirable size range (1- to 5 μm) from liquids, usually aqueous solutions or suspensions of drugs. They have the advantage over MDIs and DPIs that the drug may be inhaled during normal breathing through a mouth-piece or a face-mask. Thus, they can be employed to deliver aerosolised drug to patients, such as children, who experience difficulties using other devices.
Several types of therapeutically useful drug can be delivered by nebulisers, including β2-agonists, corticosteroids, anticholinergics, anti-allergics, mucolytics and antibiotics. The major clinical setting in which therapy with aerosolised antibiotics has been tried is the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).
CF is a common genetic disease that is characterised by the inflammation and progressive destruction of lung tissue. The debilitation of the lungs in CF patients is associated with accumulation of purulent sputum produced as a result of endobronchial infections caused in particular by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The latter ones are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with CF.
Tobramycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic, specifically active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It penetrates endobronchial secretions (sputum) poorly, necessitating large intravenous doses to attain an efficacious concentration at the site of infection. These high doses place the patient at risk for nephrotoxic and ototoxic effects. The direct delivery of tobramycin to the lower airways by aerosol administration is attractive, since it produces high concentrations of antibiotic at the site of infection. In view of the limited absorption into the circulation, aerosol delivery of tobramycin should be associated with minimal systemic toxicity. This would allow for the development of a safer, long-term therapy.
At this regard, being its therapeutic dose quite large, nebulisation turns out to be extremely convenient due to the impossibility of formulating tobramycin into an MDI or DPI.
The clinical studies reported in the literature show contradictory results in terms of benefit from aerosolised tobramycin in patients with CF. The variability among these studies might, in part, result from the differences in the patient population, therapeutic modalities, nebulisers, formulations and their mode of administration. Furthermore, most of the studies have been carried out through the extemporaneous use of the commercially available injectable solutions. These preparations normally contain anti-oxidant and preservatives which are known to cause paradoxical reactions such as bronchospasm and cough (Nikolaizik et al Eur J Pediatr 1996, 155, 608-611; The Lancet, Jul. 23, 1988, 202).
For all these reasons, there is a need for standardised procedures as well as for improvement in aerosol administration of antibiotic such as tobramycin to CF patients.
Therefore, in consideration of all problems outlined, it would be highly advantageous to provide a tobramycin formulation of a therapeutically useful concentration deliverable by aerosolization into the endobronchial space which: i) could be efficiently nebulised in a relatively short time using both jet and ultrasonic nebulisers; ii) could permit generation of aerosol well-tolerated by patients; iii) is able to produce aerosol particles which can efficaciously reach the therapeutic target area; iv) is rid of substances (preservatives and others) that may give rise to undesirable side effects; v) could guarantee as long as possible a shelf-life, in particular at room temperature.
Accordingly, in order to obtain an optimised formulation for tobramycin aerosol administration, the following parameters need to be carefully adjusted:
It is an object of the invention to provide a formulation to be administered by nebulisation suitable for well-tolerated and efficacious delivery of tobramycin into the endobronchial space for treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa and/or other susceptible bacterial infections associated to pulmonary diseases such as CF.
In particular, it is an object of the invention to provide a formulation in the form of aqueous solution to be administered by nebulisation, wherein tobramycin concentration, tonicity and pH have been optimised for guaranteeing better compliance of the patients, maximal tolerance and efficacy and as long as possible a shelf-life at room temperature.
According to the present invention there is provided a formulation constituted of 7.5% w/v tobramycin in an aqueous solution having a pH of between 4.0. and 5.5 and osmolarity between 250 and 450 mOsm/l (approximately equivalent to mOsm/kg).
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the formulation contains 300 mg of tobramycin sulfate in 4 ml of half-saline aqueous solution (0.45% of sodium chloride) in order to have an osmolarity ranging from 280 to 350 mOsm/l and it has a pH of 5.2.
In the prior art, several tobramycin formulations for inhalation have been proposed for the treatment of patients with CF and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.
Most of the commercially available tobramycin solution for injection when extemporarily used for inhalation can cause significant bronchial obstruction as they are not preservative-free but contain anti-oxidants such as sodium EDTA and/or sodium metabisulphite and preservatives such as phenol.
Wall et al (The Lancet, 1983, Jun. 11, 1325) reported the result of a clinical study upon inhalation of 80 mg tobramycin plus 1 g ticarcillin twice daily from a hand-held nebuliser. On their own admission, one of the drawbacks of the regimen is the time required for inhalation (about 30 min).
Ramsey et al (New Eng J Med 1993, 328, 1740-1746) conducted an extensive study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aerosolised tobramycin. For reaching the target concentration (≧400 μg per gram of sputum), they used 600 mg of preservative-free tobramycin sulfate dissolved in 30 ml of half-strength physiologic saline, adjusted to a pH of 6.85 to 7.05. The large volume was required by the ultrasonic nebuliser used (DeVilbiss). Besides the long term required for inhalation, the pH is not optimal either. From a stability point of view, it is known that, at pH around neutrality, tobramycin rapidly oxidises although it is very stable towards hydrolysis (Brandl et al Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1992, 18, 1423-1436). Common Compendia (Martindale, Physician Desk Reference) suggest indeed to maintain tobramycin solution at a pH comprised between 3.0 and 6.5.
EP 734249 claims a formulation comprising from 200 mg to 400 mg of aminoglycoside dissolved in about 5 ml of solution containing 0.225% of sodium chloride (¼ normal saline —NS—) and having pH between 5.5 and 6.5. According to the inventors, the formulation contains minimal yet efficacious amount of aminoglycoside formulated in a small as possible a volume of physiologically acceptable solution having a salinity adjusted to permit generation of aminoglycoside aerosol well-tolerated by patients but preventing the development of secondary undesirable effects such as bronchospasm and cough (pg. 4, lines 51-55). The preferred tobramycin formulation containing ¼ NS with 60 mg of tobramycin per ml of ¼ NS (which equates to 6% w/v) has a pH of about 6.0 and an osmolarity in the range of 165-190 mOsm/l. According to the inventors, the osmolarity range is within the safe range of aerosols administered to a cystic fibrosis patient and a further advantage of the quarter normal saline, i.e. saline containing 0.225% of sodium chloride with 60 mg/ml tobramycin is that this formulation is more efficiently nebulised by an ultrasonic nebuliser compared to tobramycin formulated in a solution 0.9% normal saline (pg. 5, lines 50-54). The inventors state that a more concentrated solution (in comparison to 60 mg per ml) will increase the osmolarity of the solution, thus decreasing the output of the formulation with both jet and ultrasonic nebulisers. Alternatively, a more concentrated solution in a smaller volume is also disadvantageous due to the typical dead space volume of the nebulisers (1 ml): that means that the last 1 ml of solution is wasted because the nebuliser is not fully performing (pg. 6, lines 35-38). The claimed pH range was found to be optimal from the storage and longer shelf-life point of view (page 7 lines 2-3) but, indeed, it allows to achieve completely stable solutions at 5° C. and effectively stable ones at room temperature for 6 months; moreover the claimed formulation remain within an acceptable range of color obtained upon storage in pouch (so protected from light), but there is no data referring to its behaviour outside the pouch.
A pH between 5.5 and 6.5 was claimed because, in the Opinion of the inventors, any aerosol with a pH of less than 4.5 usually will induce bronchospasm in a susceptible individual and aerosols with a pH between 4.5 and 5.5 will occasionally cause this problem (pg. 5, line 58-pg. 6, line 1) Le Brun et al Int J Pharm 1999, 189, 205-214 disclosed a 10% w/v tobramycin solution for inhalation having a pH of 7.5. The same authors (Int J Pharm 1999, 189, 215-225), in a further study aiming at developing highly concentrated solutions, have studied the aerosolization properties of several tobramycin solutions, ranging from 5 to 30% w/v. All the solutions disclosed in this paper have a, pH around the neutrality and exhibit an osmolarity far away from an isotonic value (282 mOsm/l).
In none of aforementioned documents the features of the formulation of the present invention are disclosed and none of the teaching therein disclosed fully contributes to the solution of the problem underlying the invention, to provide a concentrated solution to be delivered by aerosol in a smaller volume, with a tonicity closer to the physiological value.
The use of a more concentrated solution with respect to that reported as optimal in the prior art (7.5% vs. 6.0% w/v) allows to employ vials with a smaller volume, so allowing, in turn, to reduce the time of nebulisation. Although it is true that some nebulisers have a dead space volume of 1 ml, other have a minor one (0.5 ml or less), so the wasting of using vials of 4 ml would be only approx. 10% or less.
According to the invention, the osmolarity of the formulation is within the range of solutions considered as isotonic, whereas both the formulations of EP 734249 and Ramsey et al have an osmolarity, i.e. 165-190 mOsm/l, typical of solutions considered as hypotonic (Derbracher et al Atemwegs and Lung 1994, 20, 381-382). Although the formulations of the prior art turned out to be safe, only isotonic solutions may completely prevent the risk of paradoxical bronchoconstriction. Moreover, the results reported in the example 2 indicate that the formulations having an osmolarity in the range claimed, contrary to what stated in EP 734249, are efficiently nebulised despite their higher concentration.
The pH between 4.0 and 5.5, preferably 5.2, was found to be optimal in terms of storage and shelf-life at room temperature. Long-term stability studies show that tobramycin in the formulation of the present invention is stable for over nine months. Moreover, for all that period, its colour does not significantly change and remains within an acceptable range even if not stored in a foil overpouch.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, there is also provided a process for the preparation of such formulation, said process including the steps of:
The aerosol formulations of the invention refer to a 7.5% w/v aqueous solution of an antibiotic of the aminoglycoside family, preferably tobramycin and salts thereof, for the treatment of lung infections due to Gram positive and negative bacteria, in pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis, non-CF bronchiectasis infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other chronic pneumopathies, particularly in an exacerbation phase, such as bronchiectasis, COPD and bronchial asthma.
The osmolarity of the formulation should range between 250 and 450 mOsm/l, preferably between 260 and 400, even more preferably between 280 and 350 mOsm/l; it can be adjusted by using any physiologically acceptable salt or non-volatile compounds; preferably, tobramycin is dissolved in a 0.45% sodium chloride aqueous solution.
The pH can be adjusted by using any concentrated strong acid, preferably sulfuric acid and should range from 4.0 to 5.5, preferably from 5.0 to 5.4.
The formulations of the invention can be distributed in suitable containers such as multidose vials or pre-sterilised unit dose vials of 2 or 4 ml, depending on the therapeutic indication; otherwise, the vials can be aseptically filled using the “blow, fill and seal” technology. The filling is preferably carried out under inert atmosphere. The solution formulations can be advantageously sterilised by filtration.
The invention is illustrated by the following examples.
The composition refers to 1 unit-dose vial (2 ml)
Sodium chloride is dissolved into 40 l of purified water (mix for 15 minutes to guarantee the NaCl complete dissolution). Then, 30 l of sulphuric acid (2N H2S04) is added to the saline solution; during the operation, the solution temperature is monitored. When the solution temperature is about 25÷30° C., N2 is insufflated to obtain a value of dissolved O2 less than 1 mg/l. Afterwards, tobramycin is added and mixed to complete dissolution (for not less than 15 minutes) while the temperature is maintained below 25-30° C. The pH value is checked and, if necessary, sulphuric acid 2N or sodium hydroxide solution 1M are added to obtain a pH value of 5.2±0.2. When the solution temperature is 25° C.±2° C., purified water is added to reach the final volume. The resulting solution is mixed for 15 minutes. The pH value is checked again and, if necessary, sulphuric acid 2N or sodium hydroxide solution 1M are added, to obtain a pH value of 5.2±0.2. The solution is filtered through one 0.45 μm Nylon filter, and through two 0.2 μm Nylon filters.
The solution is distributed in 2 ml polyethylene colorless unit dose vials under nitrogen purging.
The stability of the vials was evaluated both under long-term (25° C., 60% R.H.) and accelerated conditions (40° C., 75% R.H.) [R.H.=relative humidity]. Results are reported in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Assays of tobramycin and of its main related substances (degradation products) were determined by HPLC. Residual oxygen, pH and osmolarity were also assayed. The osmolarity was measured using a freezing-point depression osmometer.
The formulation of the invention turns out to be stable for at least 9 months at room temperature and for 6 months under accelerated conditions. pH and osmolarity remain substantially unchanged under both conditions. At room temperature, the colour of the formulation of the invention does not significantly change and remains within an acceptable range even if not stored in a foil overpouch.
The nebulisation efficiency of the solution for inhalation of example 1, expressed as percentage of active ingredient nebulised, was evaluated using a commercial jet nebuliser (PARI-BOY) for a 5-minute nebulisation time. The size profile of the droplets produced by nebulisation of the solution, expressed as diameter (μm) below which respectively 10%, 50% and 90% of the droplets are included, was also characterised by Malvern analysis.
A formulation prepared according to the teaching of the preferred embodiment of EP 734249, i.e. containing 60 mg of active ingredient per ml of 0.225% sodium chloride aqueous solution and having a pH of about 6, was nebulised for comparison. Both formulations were filled in 2 ml unit dose vials. The results are reported in Table 3 as a mean of two determinations.
The results indicate that the formulation according to example 1 having an osmolarity near isotonicity is efficiently nebulised.
The size profile of the droplets produced by nebulisation is instead practically the same.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01116071 | Jul 2001 | EP | regional |
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/083,139, filed on Mar. 18, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,696,178, which was a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/482,224, filed on Apr. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,987,094, which is a 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP02/06544, filed on Jun. 14, 2002, and claims priority to European Patent Application No. 01116071, filed on Jul. 2, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3361306 | Grim | Jan 1968 | A |
3622053 | Ryden | Nov 1971 | A |
4185100 | Rovee et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4499108 | Sequeira et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4579854 | Iwakuma et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4584320 | Rubin et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4835145 | MacDonald | May 1989 | A |
5190029 | Byron et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192528 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5415853 | Hettche et al. | May 1995 | A |
5435297 | Klein | Jul 1995 | A |
5508269 | Smith et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5605674 | Purewal et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5642728 | Andersson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653961 | McNally et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5676930 | Jager et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683677 | Purewal et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695743 | Purewal et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5776433 | Tzou et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5891419 | Cutie | Apr 1999 | A |
5954047 | Armer et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955058 | Jager et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6004537 | Blondino et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006745 | Marecki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026808 | Armer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045778 | Jager et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045784 | Ruebusch et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6131566 | Ashurst | Oct 2000 | A |
6143277 | Ashurst et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149892 | Britto | Nov 2000 | A |
6150418 | Hochrainer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6241969 | Saidi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253762 | Britto | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290930 | Blondino et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315985 | Wu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6413496 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451285 | Blondino et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6461591 | Keller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6645466 | Keller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6713047 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716414 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6987094 | Malvolti et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20010031244 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030066525 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077230 | Blondino et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089369 | Lewis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030157028 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030190287 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190289 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206870 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040047809 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062720 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096399 | Lewis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040184993 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050129621 | Davies et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142071 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152846 | Davies et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060083693 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060120966 | Church et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 372 777 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 504 112 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 642 992 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 653 204 | May 1995 | EP |
0734 249 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 911 048 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1 157 689 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1 525 181 | Sep 1978 | GB |
2 326 334 | Dec 1998 | GB |
WO 9111173 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9211236 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO 9220391 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9305765 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9311743 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9311747 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9318746 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9413262 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9414490 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9421228 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9421229 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9517195 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9612471 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9618384 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9619198 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9619968 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9619969 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9632099 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9632150 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9632151 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9632345 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9747286 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9801147 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9803533 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9805302 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9813031 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9824420 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9834595 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9834596 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9856349 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9912596 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9964014 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9965460 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9965464 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0006121 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0007567 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0023065 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0030608 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0035458 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0053157 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0078286 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0147493 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0189480 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 03074023 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100098642 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11083139 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12642336 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10482224 | US | |
Child | 11083139 | US |