The present disclosure is directed to optimization of energy usage based on users goals and preferences, and more particularly to optimization of energy usage using model-based simulations.
As non-renewable energy resources are being depleted and energy costs become increasingly more expensive and volatile, consumers continue to seek out ways to reduce their energy consumption and energy costs. Many energy systems (e.g., energy-consuming or energy-producing systems) allow users to establish automated schedules that dictate how and when the energy systems should be used. For example, a heating and cooling system may allow a user to set temperatures for different times of day, such as a “wake” time and temperature, an “away” time and temperature, a “return” time and temperature, and a “sleep” time and temperature. At the predetermined times the system adjusts to the predetermined temperatures. However, these systems require a user to both configure them properly and, more importantly, adjust the times and temperatures to adapt to changing needs and concerns with respect to energy consumption or production. These systems do not take into account the amount of energy used, or the cost of the energy used. An intelligent system for adapting to changing energy costs and energy needs while achieving user goals with respect to energy consumption or production and costs is desired.
A facility implementing systems and/or methods for achieving energy consumption or production and cost goals is described. The facility identifies various components of an energy system, such as a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system, load-control switch, hot water heater, electric vehicle, electric appliance, solar system, etc. and assesses the environment in which those components operate, such as the thermal capacitance of a building in which a HVAC system operates, current and forecasted weather conditions, and energy costs. Based on the identified components and assessments, the facility generates a simulation model that can be used to simulate different time-based series or schedules of adjustments to the energy system and how those adjustments will effect energy consumption. For example, the facility may use the simulation model to calculate the amount of energy consumed or the cost of the energy consumed for different heating/cooling schedules for an HVAC system. Based on user patterns and preferences (e.g., when users consume energy, whether a user desires to reduce energy costs and/or energy consumption, when users prefer certain appliances to operate), the facility can identify an optimal series or schedule of adjustments for the user and provide the schedule to the system for implementation. As another example, the facility may use the simulation model to calculate the amount of energy produced or the value of the energy produced. Additionally, the facility can configure the system to operate in accordance with a demand profile received from a utility.
For example, the simulations may show that “heating/cooling schedule A” causes the HVAC system to consume 50 kilowatt hours (kWh) of energy per day at an average cost of 50¢ per kWh ($2.50 per day) while heating/cooling schedule B causes the HVAC system to consume 60 kWh per day at an average cost of 40 per kWh ($2.40 per day). Accordingly, a user looking to reduce energy costs may choose schedule B while a user looking to reduce energy consumption may choose schedule A. In this manner, the facility can optimize the HVAC system to achieve user goals with respect to energy use. As another example, a utility may provide a demand schedule and encourage users to implement the schedule to receive discounts or other compensation. The facility can, using the demand schedule, configure the system to comply with the energy consumption preferences of the utility.
In some embodiments, the facility operates in a learning mode to identify components of an energy system. When working in conjunction with an HVAC system, for example, the facility may query a thermostat and/or other components to identify the different components in the system, such as air-conditioning units, sensors, photovoltaic systems (e.g., roof-mounted photovoltaic systems), fans, pumps, etc. In other examples, the facility may provide a user interface through which a user can manually identify the various components in the system. As another example, when working in conjunction with an electric vehicle, the facility may identify the electric vehicle and its battery.
In addition to identifying components while in the learning mode, the facility may also perform tests to identify attributes of the energy system and the environment in which the system operates. For example, the facility may perform a number of tests on an HVAC system, such as a heating step test, a free-float test, and a cooling step test while monitoring different areas (e.g., rooms) of the surrounding environment to determine where and how fast the various areas acquire or lose heat. Based on the information collected during the monitoring phase, the facility can employ system identification techniques, such as those described in Applied System Identification by Jer-Nan Juang (Prentice Hall, 1994), which is herein incorporated by reference, to determine attributes of the energy system and environment, such as an envelope resistance, thermal capacitance, thermal resistance, and heating capacity of a building in which the HVAC system operates. One skilled in the art will understand that the facility may determine additional attributes of the environment, such as occupancy schedule, internal gains, the schedule of internal gains, window area, window properties, wall/roof/floor area, wall/roof/floor insulation, wall/roof/floor thermal capacitance, wall/roof/floor thermal state (temperature) heating and cooling set points and their schedule, heating equipment efficiency, fan energy consumption, cooling equipment efficiency, infiltration, exterior shading, photovoltaic system efficiency, photovoltaic system orientation, electric vehicle capacity, electric vehicle charging rate, electric vehicle state of charge, appliance energy consumption, appliance schedule, and so on. The facility may also determine ranges of operating conditions for various components of the energy system, such as the available settings for each fan, blower, vent, heating unit, cooling unit, etc. and the amount of energy that the system and each component of the system consumes while in use, such as how much energy an HVAC system and/or an air conditioner consume while cooling a building from one temperature set point to another temperature set point or how much energy the HVAC system, central heating unit, fans, blowers, etc. consume while heating from one set point to another. As another example, the facility may perform a number of tests and measurements on the battery of an electric vehicle to determine the battery's charge capacity, the battery's charge rate, etc.
In some embodiments, the facility determines patterns and preferences of individuals who interact with the environment, such as when residents of a home awake or return home from work, when employees of a business arrive and leave for work, the preferred temperature conditions during various stages, etc., and retrieves information about external conditions that may impact the use of the energy system, such as weather conditions/forecasts and energy pricing information. The facility may determine these patterns by monitoring sensors and/or components distributed through the system and surrounding environment or receiving direct input from a user.
In some embodiments, the facility generates a simulation model for the energy system and surrounding environment based on the attributes identified while in learning mode. The simulation model specifies the amount of energy used by the energy system to transition between various states—such as transitions between different thermostat set points, change levels, etc.—using different components of the energy system under different operating conditions. For example, an HVAC system may be configurable to heat a building using a different combination of components (e.g., fans and blowers) and different settings for those components, such as operating a central heating unit and/or blower at full capacity while heating a building, operating the central heating unit at 50% while operating fans and blowers at 75%, and so on, each combination of settings offering different levels of energy consumption. In addition to (or alternatively to) the combinations of components and settings described herein, different combinations of components and settings can be used during the process of generating a simulation model.
Using the simulation model and the determined user preferences, the facility can simulate a number of different schedules for the energy system, each schedule specifying times for transitioning components of the energy system between states and operating conditions, such as a time to turn on a central heating unit and an operating level (e.g., full capacity, 25%, 75%) for the central heating unit while heating a building before individuals (e.g., residents, employees, or customers) arrive/depart. In some examples, the facility performs an optimization technique on the simulation model (e.g., a meta-heuristic optimization technique, the Particle Swarm Optimization technique described by J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart in Particle Swarm Optimization (Proc. IEEE International Conf. on Neural Networks (Perth, Australia), IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, N.J., 1995), which is herein incorporated by reference), to identify an optimal schedule. During the simulations, the facility may employ user preferences, such as minimum and maximum temperatures or minimum and maximum energy consumption levels, as limits for acceptable schedules to prevent the system from operating under conditions that a user would find unacceptable. After performing the simulations, the facility can determine, for each simulated schedule, both 1) the amount of energy consumed by the energy system if the schedule were to be implemented and 2) if energy pricing information is known to the facility, the cost of implementing the schedule. Based on user preferences, the facility can choose a schedule for implementation, such as the schedule with the lowest cost or energy consumption. Additionally, the facility can choose a schedule for implementation that best satisfies a utility objective (e.g., demand reduction) with no adverse impact to the user(s).
User preferences store 205 stores user preferences, such as preferred temperature settings (which may be time-based if a user prefers different temperatures based on the time of day, month, or year), preferred energy consumption goals (e.g., a preference to reduce consumption or costs), etc. Simulation model store 206 stores attributes of a simulation model generated based on attributes of an energy system and the surrounding environment. Schedule store 207 stores schedules for the system, such as the schedule that optimizes the system for a user's preferences. This schedule can be provided to the system to facilitate implementation of the user preferences.
The computing devices on which the disclosed facility is implemented may include a central processing unit, memory, input devices (e.g., keyboard and pointing devices), output devices (e.g., display devices), and storage devices (e.g., disk drives). The memory and storage devices are computer-readable media that may be encoded with computer-executable instructions that implement the technology, which means a computer-readable medium that contains the instructions. In addition, the instructions, data structures, and message structures may be stored or transmitted via a data transmission medium, such as a signal on a communications link and may be encrypted. Various communications links may be used, such as the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network, a point-to-point dial-up connection, a cell phone network, and so on.
The disclosed facility may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and so on that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically, the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Many embodiments of the technology described herein may take the form of computer-executable instructions, including routines executed by a programmable computer. Those skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that aspects of the technology can be practiced on computer systems other than those shown and described herein. Embodiments of the technology may be implemented in and used with various operating environments that include personal computers, server computers, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, programmable consumer electronics, digital cameras, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and so on. Moreover, the technology can be embodied in a special-purpose computer or data processor that is specifically programmed, configured or constructed to perform one or more of the computer-executable instructions described herein. Accordingly, the terms “computer” or “system” as generally used herein refer to any data processor and can include Internet appliances and hand-held devices (including palm-top computers, wearable computers, cellular or mobile phones, multi-processor systems, processor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network computers, mini computers and the like). Information handled by these computers can be presented at any suitable display medium, including a CRT display or LCD.
The technology can also be practiced in distributed environments, where tasks or modules are performed by remote processing devices linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules or subroutines may be located in local and remote memory storage devices. Aspects of the technology described herein may be stored or distributed on computer-readable media, including magnetic or optically readable or removable computer disks, as well as distributed electronically over networks. Data structures and transmissions of data particular to aspects of the technology are also encompassed within the scope of the technology.
In block 320, the facility retrieves a weather forecast, which may include forecasted temperatures and weather conditions for a predetermined number of hours, days, etc. In block 330, the module retrieves current and/or forecasted energy cost information (e.g., a cost schedule indicating a flat rate of 7.5¢ per kWh, a cost schedule indicating 5¢ per kWh for the first 10 kWh per day and 10¢ for each additional kWh per day, a cost schedule indicating various prices for each hour, or a range of times, of the day). In block 340, the module generates a simulation model based on the attributes detected and determined while in the learning mode. In block 350, the module performs simulations based on the generated simulation model, each simulation providing a schedule and estimated energy consumption over the course of the schedule.
In block 360, the module identifies the schedule with the preferred energy consumption (e.g., the schedule resulting in the lowest cost based on the retrieved cost information or the schedule resulting in the lowest overall consumption of energy). For example, the schedule may specify that a central heating unit of an HVAC system is to be turned on at 80% of capacity at 6:00 am with blowers operating at 75% and then turned off at 8:00 pm and then turned on again at 70% capacity at 4:45 pm before being turned off at 11:00 pm. In block 370, the facility provides the identified schedule to the system for implementation and then loops back to block 320. For example, the facility may communicate a schedule of set points to a thermostat for implementation. In some embodiments, the optimize process occurs frequently throughout the day to incorporate new and/or changed information into the optimization, such as occupant overrides, updated forecasts (e.g., weather and cost), schedule changes, etc. Furthermore, this process may occur on demand according to information provided by an energy provider, such as demand response events.
In block 430, the learn module collects data to assess how the system and environment changes during the heating step test, such as the rate at which the environment heats up (i.e. stores and retains heat), and that can be used to determine attributes of the system and environment. The heating step test may include, for example, heating the environment at one degree (or more) increments at a time based on the temperature measured at a predetermined location and collecting data from each of the sensors as the environment heats, including an indication of the amount of energy consumed by the system as the environment transitions between temperatures. In some cases, the learn module may perform the heating step test multiple times using different operating configurations (e.g., different operating levels—such as 0% to 100%—for a central heating unit, fans, blowers, vents, etc.) or under different operating conditions. In decision block 435, if the heating step test is complete then the learn module continues at block 440, else the module loops back to block 430 to collect additional data generated during the heating step test.
In block 440, the learn module performs a free float test. During the free float test, the facility turns off the HVAC system to monitor how the environment retains, loses, or gains heat without input from the HVAC system. In block 450, the learn module collects data from the available sensors to assess how the system and environment changes during the free float step test and that can be used to determine attributes of the system and environment. In decision block 455, if the free float test is complete, then the learn module continues at block 460, else the module loops back to block 450 to collect additional data generated during the free float test.
In block 460, the module performs a cooling step test to collect data while cooling down the environment. In block 470, the learn module collects data to assess how the system and environment changes during the cooling step test, such as the rate at which the environment cools down and where heat is lost, and that can be used to determine attributes of the system and environment. The cooling step test may include, for example, cooling the environment at one degree (or more) increments, based on, for example, the temperature measured at a predetermined location and collecting data from each of the sensors as the environment cools, including an indication of the amount of energy consumed by the system as the environment transitions between temperatures. In some cases, the learn module may perform the cooling test multiple times using different operating configurations (e.g., different operating levels—such as 0% to 100%—for an air conditioner, fans, blowers, vents, etc.) or under different operating conditions. In decision block 475, if the cooling step test is complete, then the module continues at decision block 480, else the module loops back to block 470 to collect additional data generated during the cooling step test. In decision block 480, if testing is complete then the learn module terminates processing, else the module loops back to block 420 to continue testing.
In block 520, the detect patterns module collects data from the device, such as its current operating condition, current configuration, and so on. In decision block 530, if the detect patterns module determines that one or more individuals are present in the vicinity of the device (e.g., based on data collected from a presence or proximity sensor) then the module continues at block 535, else the module continues at block 540. In block 535, the detect patterns module attempts to identify the individual(s) using, for example, an object carried by an individual, such as an RFID tag, voice or face recognition techniques if audio or video data is available, and so on. In this manner, the facility can associate different individuals with preferred settings. For example, if the facility determines that a thermostat is regularly adjusted to 68 degrees when a particular individual enters a room, the facility may associate the particular individual with a preferred temperature of 68 degrees. Furthermore, by detecting individuals the module allows the facility to detect patterns among individuals with respect to their interactions with the system, such as when they arrive and leave.
In block 540, the detect patterns module stores the data collected from the device, time information (e.g., a time stamp), and an indication of the presence of any individual. In block 550, if there are additional devices from which data has not been collected, then the detect patterns module selects the next device and loops back to block 510. In decision block 560, if the module is to continue checking devices, then the module continues at block 570, else processing of the module completes. In block 570, the detect patterns module waits a predetermined period of time (e.g., 1 milliseconds, 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, a month) and then loops back to block 510 to continue processing data from the devices.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the disclosure. The facility can include additional components or features, and/or different combinations of the components or features described herein. Additionally, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the new technology have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the technology. For example, the facility may operate in conduction with an energy-producing system Accordingly, the disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/894,508, titled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ACHIEVING ENERGY CONSUMPTION GOALS THROUGH MODEL-BASED SIMULATIONS, filed Jun. 5, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/564,623, titled OPTIMIZATION OF ENERGY USE THROUGH MODEL-BASED SIMULATIONS, filed Aug. 1, 2012, both of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4042013 | Demaray et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4401943 | Morris | Aug 1983 | A |
4475685 | Grimado et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
5179556 | Turner | Jan 1993 | A |
5510975 | Ziegler | Apr 1996 | A |
5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5684710 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696695 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719861 | Okanoue | Feb 1998 | A |
5865991 | Hsu | Feb 1999 | A |
5924486 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949976 | Chappelle | Sep 1999 | A |
5959529 | Kail | Sep 1999 | A |
6028857 | Poor | Feb 2000 | A |
6092207 | Kolinski et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6178362 | Woolard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6208247 | Agre et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216956 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6498955 | Mccarthy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6631309 | Boies et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640248 | Jorgensen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6680922 | Jorgensen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684339 | Willig | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6754504 | Reed | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6859831 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6947483 | Engwer | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7058657 | Berno | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062389 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7130719 | Ehlers et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7171287 | Weiss | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216021 | Matsubara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245947 | Salokannel et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263450 | Hunter | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266428 | Alexanian | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7302634 | Lucovsky et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7333821 | Willey | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356548 | Culp et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7364093 | Garozzo | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7505852 | Board | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539488 | Friedman | May 2009 | B2 |
7552033 | Culp et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7769611 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7775454 | Mueller et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7966104 | Srivastava et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8010240 | Mattiocco et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8014905 | Ehlers | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8121741 | Taft et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8175756 | Musti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176095 | Murray et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8239046 | Koehler et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265776 | Osann | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8301921 | Goodnow et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8332055 | Veillette | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8510255 | Fadell et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8515878 | Radloff et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8543251 | Plant | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549335 | Goodnow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8554376 | Matsuoka et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8560128 | Satterthwaite et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583531 | Hirl | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8630742 | Stefanski et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8674843 | Bhageria et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8730057 | Dalla | May 2014 | B2 |
8761945 | Hadzidedic | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8872667 | Bhageria et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8892264 | Steven et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8977404 | Benes et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003343 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9007077 | El-Essawy et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9026261 | Bukhin et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9244446 | Bhageria et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9256908 | Dai et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9298197 | Matsuoka et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9310815 | Shiflet | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9329212 | Benes et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9423779 | Agarwal | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9471718 | Bukhin et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9576472 | Koch | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9696055 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9722813 | Benes et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9785129 | Bhageria et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9923416 | Bhageria et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10007243 | Bhageria et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10281895 | Agarwal | May 2019 | B2 |
10379508 | Shiflet | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10678279 | Corbin | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10697662 | Matsuoka et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10708077 | Cui et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10782666 | Agarwal | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10866568 | Hummon et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10911256 | Benes et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11042141 | Shiflet | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11149975 | Knatchbull-Hugessen et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11327457 | Agarwal | May 2022 | B2 |
11385664 | Corbin | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20020002636 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020071398 | Moran et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020158763 | Takarada et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030069970 | Kim et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083758 | Williamson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030190912 | Jampolsky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191955 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216837 | Reich et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227439 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034684 | Payne | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040117330 | Ehlers et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133314 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138981 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139038 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040249515 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260411 | Cannon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262410 | Hull | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038571 | Brickfield et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043829 | Rossides | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055137 | Andren et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060107 | Rodenberg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095978 | Blunn et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096060 | Rajkotia et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096857 | Hunter | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124358 | Willey | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125083 | Kiko | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157723 | Kim et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171645 | Oswald et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060005046 | Hars | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060143600 | Cottrell et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060200542 | Willig | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200658 | Penkethman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209789 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060276938 | Miller | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043477 | Ehlers et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043478 | Ehlers et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045431 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097993 | Bojahra et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070173978 | Fein et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174644 | Willig | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070239317 | Bogolea et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251461 | Reichard et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080021749 | Hope | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080065816 | Seo | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076346 | Ahmed | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080129495 | Hitt | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080256445 | Olch et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263196 | Kansal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271123 | Ollis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277486 | Seem et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300906 | Doi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306985 | Murray et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007706 | Hitt et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045256 | McInerney et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059842 | Maltseff et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090115597 | Giacalone | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135018 | Veillette et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135836 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090320012 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010678 | Dawson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100031324 | Strich et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042453 | Scaramellino et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070101 | Benes et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070102 | Benes et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097225 | Petricoin | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100253 | Fausak et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107112 | Jennings et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100156665 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204834 | Comerford et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100289643 | Trundle et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110029341 | Muse et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032070 | Bleile | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040785 | Steenberg et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046805 | Bedros et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110144932 | Alles | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166710 | Kordik et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110227417 | Walker | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231320 | Irving | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251807 | Rada et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282808 | Amram et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289019 | Radloff et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110313964 | Sanchey Loureda et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029717 | Cox et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031984 | Feldmeier et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053740 | Venkatakrishnan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065789 | Scelzi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079092 | Woxblom et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101651 | Haynes | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120173456 | Hirl | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203379 | Sloo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246279 | Zang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120316687 | Chen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323637 | Cushing et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013121 | Henze et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130103207 | Ruff et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116835 | Nowel | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151012 | Shetty et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170481 | Crawford et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178986 | Lombard et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130314210 | Schoner et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140039690 | Steinberg | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140101082 | Matsuoka et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140222241 | Ols | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277761 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277765 | Karimi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278264 | Bukhin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297001 | Silverman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309869 | Ricci | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309892 | Ricci | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140371921 | Weaver et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379156 | Kamel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150032264 | Emmons et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150057824 | Gheerardyn et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150100167 | Sloo et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150168002 | Plitkins et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178421 | Borrelli et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178865 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150198346 | Vedpathak | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150248118 | Li et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150277409 | Yamada | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150369847 | Roosli | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160088438 | Okeeffe | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160131388 | Eiynk et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160201934 | Hester et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160223214 | Turner et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160313751 | Risbeck et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170055126 | O'Keeffe | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170123440 | Mangsuli et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170191695 | Bruhn et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170288401 | Hummon et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180010818 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180136621 | Buda et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190242608 | Laftchiev et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190264942 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190338974 | Turney et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200393860 | Corbin | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210241125 | Jost et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210294283 | Hummon et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210404691 | Sakata et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220035329 | Shiflet | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220170655 | Knatchbull-Hugessen et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220373990 | Agarwal | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0074306 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2012068503 | May 2012 | WO |
2014085777 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ahmad et al. “Computational intelligence techniques for HVAC systems: A review.” Building Simulation, Tsinghua University Press, vol. 9, No. 4, Mar. 31, 2016, pp. 359-398. |
An, Lianjun et al. “An inverse PDE-ODE model for studying building energy demand.” Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 8, 2013, pp. 1869-1880. |
De Angelis et al. Optimal Home Energy Management Under Dynamic Electrical and Thermal Constraints, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics; vol. 9, Iss. 3; 1518-1527, 2012, 12 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, EP Patent Application 17776874.4, dated Nov. 13, 2019, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 21, 2017, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/025606, 53 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Patent Application PCT/US2020/043149, dated Sep. 28, 2020, 11 pages. |
Vakiloroaya et al. A review of different strategies for HVAC energy saving. Energy, Conversion and Management; vol. 77; 735-754, 2014, 19 pages. |
Builis, Kevin, “Dumb Meters Get Smarter,” <http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22366>, Mar. 31, 2009, 2 pages. |
Dave's Tech Blog, “Itron Remote Read Electric Meter,” <http://davestech.blogspot.com/2008/02/itron-remote-read-electric-meter.html>, internet accessed on Nov. 8, 2010, 22 pages. |
Doebber, I. “Investigation of Concrete Wall Systems for Reducing Heating and Cooling Requirements in Single Family Residences” [online], Sep. 2004 [retrieved on Mar. 9, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/. |
ECONorthwest, “Process Evaluation of the SCE Aug. 2006 Home Energy Efficiency Survey (HEES) Program,” Aug. 2009. <URL: http://www.calmac.org/publications/SCE_HEES_Final_Report_080400_caimac_edit.pdf> entire document Aug. 4, 2009. |
Extended European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 13824847.1; dated Jun. 7, 2016; 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, Examination Report, EP Patent Application 17776874.4, dated Nov. 12, 2021, 10 pages. |
Hancock, Gregory, “Power monitoring to the people!” <http://www.gridinsight.com/2009/02/power-monitoring-to-the-people.html>, Feb. 25, 2009, 4 pages. |
http://blog.microsoft-hohm.com/Hohm-energy-report-sample.aspx. accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://efficiency20.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://hes.lbl.gov/consumer, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://onzo.com/solutions/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://silverspringnetworks.com/products/index.html, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.agilewaves.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.alertme.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.ambientdevices.com/products/energyjoule.htmi, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.bluelineinnovations.com, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.consert.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.diykyoto.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.energy-aware.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.energyhub.net, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.google.com/powermeter/about/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.greenenergyoptions.co.uk/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.lem.com/hq/en/content/view/276/215/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.opower.com/Products/Overview.aspx, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.powermand.com/dreamwatts-product, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.tendrilinc.com/products/vision/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.theenergydetective.com/home, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
http://www.theowl.com/, accessed on Aug. 9, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion; International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053317; Applicant Tendril Networks, Inc.; dated Feb. 12, 2015; 8 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2011/061470; dated Apr. 9, 2014; 9 pages. |
James Broberg, Rajkumar Buyya, Zhair Tari; MetaCDN: Harnessing ‘Storage Clouds’ for high performance content delivery; online publication date; Apr. 5, 2009: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804509000514. |
Kennedy, James and Russell Eberhart. “Particle Swarm Optimization,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (Perth, Australia), 1995, pp. 1942-1948. |
Retzlaff et al. Conservation & Energy Potential Study for Smith River Rancheria:, Smith River Rancheria, Evergreen NRG/Strategic Energy Solutions. Aug. 2005, 417 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/446,233; Inventor: Henze; filed Feb. 24, 2011, 17 pages. |
WIPO International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2014/029643, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 12 Pages. |
EPO, Extended European Search Report, EP Patent Application 20844598.1, dated Jul. 19, 2023, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220221885 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16894508 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17707929 | US | |
Parent | 13564623 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 16894508 | US |