The present invention relates to an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system with direct exchange and in cascade whose peculiar characteristics allow for high cycle yields.
As is known, a thermodynamic cycle is termed as a finite succession of thermodynamic transformations (such as isotherms, isochores, isobars or adiabatics) at the end of which the system returns to its initial state. In particular, an ideal Rankine cycle is a thermodynamic cycle consisting of two adiabatic and two isobaric transformations, with two phase changes: from liquid to vapor and from vapor to liquid. Its purpose is to transform heat into work. This cycle is generally adopted mainly in power generation plants for the production of electric energy, and uses water as a driving fluid, both in the liquid and vapor form, with the so-called steam turbine.
The application fields of the ORCs are numerous and range from low temperature geothermal systems to systems exchanging heat with combustion fumes at temperatures close to 1000° C. In the latter case, the organic fluid typically does not exchange heat directly with the hot source, but with an intermediate diathermic oil circuit, in order to avoid events of thermo-chemical degradation of the fluid itself. Another typical field of application is the recovery of heat from gaseous flows from industrial processes or from other power generation technologies (for example, gas turbines or as an alternative, internal combustion engines).
More specifically, a direct exchange ORC system provides some advantages with respect to the traditional solution with an intermediate oil circuit, by including a reduction in investment costs due to the absence of the oil circuit and its auxiliary consumptions during operation.
A direct exchange also entails complications in the system with respect to a diathermic oil system, as oil boilers are often standard products or are otherwise designed according to prior art and therefore they are not directly used in the direct exchange configuration for ORC cycles. Furthermore a ORC working fluid is often flammable, and so any fluid leakage from the evaporator could cause fires or burst if the hot source is a gaseous flow with temperatures and oxygen content that will allow such events.
When considering a heat recovery downstream of a gas turbine, possible heat recovery solutions with a direct exchange ORC cycle are multiple. The simplest direct exchange solution is the one with only one ORC cycle, the working fluid of which is preheated, evaporates and eventually overheats by exchanging heat directly with the fumes leaving the gas turbine, as shown by way of example in the graph of
There are limits to the possibility of increasing the recovery efficiency, by increasing the difference between the temperature of the hot portion of the cycle and the temperature of the cold portion of the cycle due to the following considerations:
the thermal stability of an organic fluid, which often precludes the use of more elevated temperatures,
the characteristics of the fluid itself which limit the possibilities to realize efficient cycles and turbines with too high expansion ratios and/or too low condensing pressures.
Moreover, the great temperature difference between the fumes and the hot portion of the cycle makes the application particularly suitable for the adoption of cascading cycles, i.e. cycles in which the condensation heat of the high temperature cycle is exploited in order to evaporate and preheat the fluid of the low temperature cycle. The possibility of cascading cycles has long been known for many academic articles and patent texts. From the known art it can be seen that the low temperature cycle can receive heat just from the high temperature cycle or partly even directly from the thermal source.
An example is Patent Application EP2607635 which describes a cascading ORC cycle system comprising a high temperature cycle and a low temperature cycle in thermal communication through a condenser/evaporator, in which in the low temperature working cycle the fluid is firstly evaporated and then overheated and in the high temperature working cycle, the fluid is firstly de-overheated and then is condensed. The efficiency gain from the solution with such a cascading cycle is limited by the fact that it is not possible to efficiently cool the fumes. Therefore, the cycles themselves have greater efficiency, which is calculated with respect to the power inputted in the corresponding ORC cycles, but they recover less heat from the hot gases.
Another example is U.S. Pat. No. 7,942,001 B2 which describes a pair of ORC cycles in cascade, in which the organic working fluid of the first cycle is condensed at a temperature above the evaporation temperature of the second working cycle of the organic working fluid. In this case, the fumes can be more cooled in order that they exchange heat even with a cooler fluid (the one of the low temperature cycle) but the recovery system from the hot source is complicated as it has two sections supplied with two different fluids.
Additionally, if the fluid of the high temperature cycle is not flammable, whereas the one of the low temperature cycle is flammable, the safety concerns already described are once again found.
There is therefore a need to define an organic Rankine cycle system with a direct exchange with cascade cycles, without any mentioned drawbacks.
The object of the present invention is therefore an organic Rankine cycle system with direct exchange and cascade cycles, which can increase the overall efficiency of the system by contacting the hot source with just one of the two fluids used in the cascade cycle, i.e. the fluid of the upper cycle.
According to the present invention, there is therefore described an organic Rankine cycle system with direct exchange and cascade cycles with the features set forth in the attached independent claim.
Further ways of implementing said system, which are preferred and/or particularly advantageous, are described in accordance with the features disclosed in the dependent claims.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate some examples of non-limiting embodiments, in which:
Referring now to the aforementioned figures, and in particular to
In the example of
With reference to
The VP-1 working fluid is then pressurized by a pump 6 and further exchanges heat with cyclopentane in the heat exchanger 4, by cooling from point a to b. In this heat exchanger 4, cyclopentane exiting from the regenerator 7′ is preheated from point 1 to m, so strongly under-cooling the VP1 fluid (preferably by more than 30°, and in
The low cyclopentane temperature (point c) according to the present invention, effectively cools the hot fumes, for example the fumes of a gas turbine, causing them to be exchanged with a fluid at a much lower temperature than the condensation temperature of the high temperature cycle. An analogous result of the thermal efficiency could have been obtained by cooling the fumes in the exchanger 1′ crossed by the low temperature cycle fluid (cyclopentane), but this would not have allowed the advantage described below. In fact, the fumes exchange heat in a direct way only with the VP-1 fluid and not with cyclopentane and this gives an advantage both in terms of simplicity of the exchanger (in case 1′ and 1 they are integrated in the same body) as well as in circuits (as to the exchangers 1 and 1′ only one working fluid is conveyed) and as the VP1 fluid has more favorable safety features (for example, there is no risk of burst with respect to cyclopentane). This under-cooling phase thus generates a kind of intermediate heat exchange circuit without the need for additional circulation pumps and all the other components present in a closed circuit (for example, in an expansion vessel): the VP-1 fluid firstly is cooled by exchanging heat with cyclopentane (ab), then it warms up in contact with the fumes (cd), and retraces almost the same curve on a temperature-power diagram.
The high temperature cycle using a VP-1 working fluid as shown in
In
Depending on the application, at the design stage a function according to the diagrams in
The system proposed by the present invention is particularly advantageous in the case where the condensation pressure of both cycles is comprised between 50 and 2000 mbar absolute, whereas the high temperature evaporation pressure of the cycle is comprised between 4 and 8 bar and the evaporation pressure of the low temperature cycle is comprised between 20 and 35 bar absolute.
In addition to the embodiments of the invention, as described above, it has to be understood that there are numerous further variants. It must also be understood that said embodiments are only exemplary and do not limit the object of the invention, its applications, or its possible configurations. On the contrary, although the foregoing description makes it possible for a man skilled in the art to implement the present invention at least according to an exemplary configuration thereof, it has to be understood that many variations of the described components are conceivable without thereby escaping from the object of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims, literally and/or according to their legal equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102016000078847 | Jul 2016 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2017/054522 | 7/26/2017 | WO | 00 |