Optimized dosing for drug coated stents

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7906133
  • Patent Number
    7,906,133
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 11, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 15, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
The inventors have found that both the drug dose and drug release profiles are significant factors for the safety and efficacy of drug coated stents. The inventors have identified optimum dosing and release kinetics for drug coated stents. In particular, the inventors have determined dosing and release kinetics that permit the delivery of the lowest effective drug dosage, thus enhancing patient safety and minimizing any side effects from the drug.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to optimized biological responses as a function of dosage and release kinetics of drugs from implantable medical devices.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Stents are tubular scaffold structures used to prop open blood vessels and other body lumens. The most widespread use of stents is to open clogged coronary arteries and prevent restenosis. The use of stents coated with therapeutic agents has been proposed to help minimize the possibility of restenosis. For example, stents coated with paclitaxel have been shown to reduce restenosis rates when compared with uncoated stents.


Although a number of drug coated stents have been reported, there has been a lack of published information regarding the optimization of drug dosing and drug release kinetics to address safety and efficacy. There is thus a need to identify, for a given coated stent system, the effective therapeutic window based on the selection of an appropriate drug dose to obtain a desired biological response.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have identified preferred drug dosing and drug release profiles for the safety and efficacy of drug coated stents. The embodiments described herein are specific to metallic stents coated with paclitaxel in a polymeric carrier, but the invention is thought to be applicable to stents coated with other drugs, with or without a polymeric carrier.


In one embodiment, the invention includes a drug coated stent comprising a structural member insertable into a body lumen of a patient, and a drug coated onto at least a portion of the said structural member. The drug is released from the stent into the patient for a time period of at least eight days after insertion into the patient.


In another embodiment, the invention includes a drug coated stent, where the drug is released from the stent at a varying rate over time. The rate is preferably maximized between one and three days after insertion into the patient.


In another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent wherein after ten days following insertion into a patient, only less than about 60 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from the stent.


In another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent wherein after two days following insertion into a patient, only less than about 10 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from the stent.


In another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent having a dosage of up to about 2 micrograms per square millimeter of the stent surface area.


In yet another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent, wherein the paclitaxel is included in a polymer carrier and the weight fraction of the paclitaxel in the polymer carrier is less than about 35 percent.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows histology results from a porcine dosing study.



FIG. 2 and FIGS. 2a-2c illustrate the difference in biological response resulting from the difference in release rate from a paclitaxel coated stent.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have found that both the drug dose and drug release profiles are significant factors for the safety and efficacy of drug coated stents. The inventors have identified optimum dosing and release kinetics for drug coated stents. In particular, the inventors have determined dosing and release kinetics that permit the delivery of the lowest effective drug dosage, thus enhancing patient safety and minimizing any side effects from the drug.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the drug for coating a stent is paclitaxel. Other drugs that may be useful for treating diseases such as restenosis include known anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombogenic, anti-angiogenic, matrix production inhibitory, anti-migratory, cytostatic, and/or cytotoxic agents. Drugs currently being used or considered as stent coating materials to combat restenosis include paclitaxel, sirolimus, tacrolimus, and everolimus. The present invention is thought to be applicable to any of these restenosis inhibiting drugs.


In another preferred embodiment, the drug paclitaxel is contained in a polymer coating applied to a metallic stent. In certain embodiments, the polymer coating is a styrene-isobutylene based block copolymer, olefin polymer, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polytetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene copolymer, polyvinyl acetate, polystyrene, poly(ethylene teraphthalate), polyurethane, polyurea, silicone rubbers, polyamides, polycarbonates, polyaldehydes, natural rubbers, polyester copolymers, styrene-butadiene copolymers ethylene vinyl acetate, polyorthoesters, polyiminocarbonates, aliphatic polycarbonates, polycaprolactone (PCL), poly-DL-lactic acid (DL-PLA) or poly-L-lactic acid (L-PLA), lactide, polyphosphazenes, polyethylene oxide or polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate(PBT), PEBAX, Nylon, or polycaprolactone, polyorthoesters, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, albumin or combinations of any of the above. In a most preferred embodiment, the polymer is a styrene-based polymer.


Paclitaxel coated metallic stents of various doses were implanted into healthy porcine arteries to determine the effect of dosage on biological response. Dosages used were approximately 4.0, 2.0, 1.0, and 0.6 micrograms per square millimeter of the stent surface area, corresponding to approximate total dosages of 345, 175, 85, and 50 micrograms per stent. The paclitaxel was contained within a styrene-isobutylene based block copolymer applied to the stent struts. As can be seen in FIG. 1a, the highest dose (i.e. 4.0 micrograms/mm2) resulted in a pronounced vessel relaxation, fibrin accumulation, medial thinning, loss of endothelial cells, and possible thrombus formation.


As the dose is decreased, the adverse effects described for the 4.0 micrograms/mm2 dose are minimized. At 2.0, 1.0, and 0.6 micrograms/mm2, there is a corresponding decrease in the effects of paclitaxel, such that endothelial cell loss, medial thinning, fibrin accumulation, and possible thrombus formation are all minimized. Based on these results, the preferred paclitaxel dosage is up to about 2.0 micrograms/mm2, more preferably less than about 1.5 micrograms/mm2, and most preferably up to about 1.0 micrograms/mm2.


In particular embodiments, the dosage is 0.4 to 2.0 micrograms/mm2, 0.7 to 1.5 micrograms/mm2, or 1.0 to 1.3 micrograms/mm2. In other embodiments, the dosage is 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, or 2.0 micrograms/mm2.


Using the 1.0 micrograms/mm2 dose as an exemplary embodiment, the effects of release rate were investigated. Metallic stents were coated with paclitaxel in a styrene-isobutylene based block copolymer carrier with the weight percent of paclitaxel in the carrier varying from approximately 8.8 to about 35%. The dose of drug applied to the stents was kept at 1.0 micrograms/mm2, and the total drug dose was held constant by varying total coating weight. The results shown in FIG. 2, as determined from in vitro release studies involving an aqueous environment, illustrate that the different weight fractions of paclitaxel in the polymer carrier resulted in different release kinetics.


In particular embodiments, the weight percent of paclitaxel in the carrier or polymer coating is 5% to 35%, 10% to 30%, 15% to 25%, or 18% to 22%.


As can be seen from FIG. 2, there was a direct correlation between drug weight fraction in the carrier and the release rate. For example, the highest weight fraction tested (35%) resulted in the release of approximately 45 micrograms of paclitaxel within two days after implantation. In contrast, the lowest weight fraction tested (8.8%) resulted in the release of only about 2 micrograms of paclitaxel within the same time period. The fastest release rate (FIG. 2a) resulted in noticeable fibrin accumulation, whereas slower rates (FIGS. 2b and 2c) did not result in this effect. It is thus demonstrated that drug release rate, in addition to drug dosing, affects biological response.


Based on these results, a high weight fraction of paclitaxel (35% in a polymer carrier) is acceptable, but a preferred weight fraction of paclitaxel is less than about 35% for a 1.0 micrograms/mm2 dosage, more preferably up to about 25%.


Most preferably, dosing of approximately 1.0 micrograms/mm2 of paclitaxel in a polymer coating was found to yield superior safety and efficacy. Within this dose, the preferred weight fraction of paclitaxel in this particular polymer carrier is less than about 35%. Such a combination results in the release of less than about 60 micrograms of paclitaxel within ten days after implantation, and less than about 45 micrograms within two days. As the inventors have found that lower doses lead to preferred physiologic responses, it is preferred that the coating system result in the cumulative release of less than about 20 micrograms of paclitaxel ten days after implantation, more preferably less than 15 micrograms, more preferably less than 10 micrograms, more preferably less than 8 micrograms, more preferably less than 6 micrograms, and more preferably less than 4 micrograms. It is additionally preferred that less than 10 micrograms of paclitaxel be released two days after implantation, more preferably less than 5 micrograms, and more preferably less than 2 micrograms.



FIG. 2 also demonstrates a continual release of drug over prolonged time frames. All curves in FIG. 2 show a relatively rapid release rate over the first few days, followed by a slower, sustained release over up to about two weeks. The inventors have found that such release rate characteristics are preferred for efficacy. In particular, the inventors have found that a coating system resulting in drug release for a period of at least eight days, and more preferably ten days, is preferred. Also, the inventors have found that the period of rapid release rate is most effective if the maximum release rate is achieved during 1-3 days after implantation, more preferably during the second day after implantation.


Although most examples herein use a polymeric carrier to deliver paclitaxel from a coated stent, it is anticipated that the optimal dosing and release rates identified by the inventors would apply to drug coated stent systems in which no polymer carrier is used, such as where paclitaxel or another drug is applied directly to the stent in the absence of a polymer carrier.


In still other embodiments, the stent is a degradable polymer stent that contains the paclitaxel, rather than being made from a biostable material that is coated with drug.


Although the invention is described as being specific to paclitaxel, it should be recognized that the inventors' findings should be applicable to a wide variety of drug systems.

Claims
  • 1. A drug coated stent comprising: a structural member insertable into a body lumen of a patient; anda drug coated onto at least a portion of said structural member;wherein about 60 micrograms or less than 60 micrograms of the drug is released within ten days after insertion into the body lumen of the patient andthe release rate is maximized between 24 hours and three days.
  • 2. The drug coated stent of claim 1, wherein said drug comprises paclitaxel.
  • 3. The drug coated stent of claim 1, wherein said drug is incorporated into a polymer carrier coated onto at least a portion of said structural member.
  • 4. The drug coated stent of claim 3, wherein said polymer comprises styrene.
  • 5. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 2, wherein about 20 micrograms or less than 20 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent ten days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 6. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 2, wherein about 15 micrograms or less than 15 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent ten days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 7. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 2, wherein about 10 micrograms or less than 10 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent ten days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 8. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 2, wherein about 8 micrograms or less than 8 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent ten days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 9. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 2, wherein about 6 micrograms or less than 6 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent ten days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 10. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 2, wherein about 4 micrograms or less than 4 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent ten days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 11. A paclitaxel coated stent comprising: a structural member insertable into a body lumen of a patient; andpaclitaxel coated onto at least a portion of said structural member;wherein about 10 micrograms or less than 10 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent two days after exposure to an aqueous environment andthe release rate is maximized between 24 hours and three days.
  • 12. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 11, wherein about 5 micrograms or less than 5 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent two days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
  • 13. The paclitaxel coated stent of claim 11, wherein about 2 micrograms or less than 5 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from said stent two days after exposure to an aqueous environment.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/252,848, filed Sep. 24, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,908,622, the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (109)
Number Name Date Kind
4529614 Burns Jul 1985 A
4535006 Naunapper et al. Aug 1985 A
RE32307 Glatt et al. Dec 1986 E
4740207 Kreamer Apr 1988 A
4753652 Langer et al. Jun 1988 A
4758151 Arru et al. Jul 1988 A
4768507 Fischell et al. Sep 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4795458 Regan Jan 1989 A
4888009 Lederman et al. Dec 1989 A
5007926 Derbyshire Apr 1991 A
5019090 Pinchuk May 1991 A
5041100 Rowland et al. Aug 1991 A
5053048 Pinchuk Oct 1991 A
5092877 Pinchuk Mar 1992 A
5102417 Palmaz Apr 1992 A
5171217 March et al. Dec 1992 A
5171812 Domb Dec 1992 A
5175235 Domb et al. Dec 1992 A
5192307 Wall Mar 1993 A
5221698 Amidon et al. Jun 1993 A
5226913 Pinchuk Jul 1993 A
5234456 Silvestrini Aug 1993 A
5236503 Jones Aug 1993 A
5240963 Domb et al. Aug 1993 A
5272012 Opolski Dec 1993 A
5282823 Schwartz et al. Feb 1994 A
5304121 Sahatjian Apr 1994 A
5334201 Cowan Aug 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5342621 Eury Aug 1994 A
5345933 Peterson et al. Sep 1994 A
5380299 Fearnot et al. Jan 1995 A
5383928 Scott et al. Jan 1995 A
5419760 Narciso, Jr. May 1995 A
5423885 Williams Jun 1995 A
5429634 Narciso Jul 1995 A
5437889 Jones Aug 1995 A
5439686 Desai et al. Aug 1995 A
5443458 Eury Aug 1995 A
5443496 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5447724 Helmus et al. Sep 1995 A
5457113 Cullinan et al. Oct 1995 A
5462937 Cullinan et al. Oct 1995 A
5464450 Buscemi et al. Nov 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5475052 Rhee et al. Dec 1995 A
5486191 Pasricha et al. Jan 1996 A
5500013 Buscemi et al. Mar 1996 A
5512055 Domb et al. Apr 1996 A
5516781 Morris et al. May 1996 A
5527337 Stack et al. Jun 1996 A
5545208 Wolff et al. Aug 1996 A
5545213 Keogh et al. Aug 1996 A
5551954 Buscemi et al. Sep 1996 A
5554182 Dinh et al. Sep 1996 A
5562922 Lambert Oct 1996 A
5571166 Dinh et al. Nov 1996 A
5575815 Slepian et al. Nov 1996 A
5578075 Dayton Nov 1996 A
5588962 Nicholas et al. Dec 1996 A
5591227 Dinh et al. Jan 1997 A
5599352 Dinh et al. Feb 1997 A
5603694 Brown et al. Feb 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5607417 Batich et al. Mar 1997 A
5607475 Cahalan et al. Mar 1997 A
5609629 Fearnot et al. Mar 1997 A
5624411 Tuch Apr 1997 A
5653760 Saffran Aug 1997 A
5679400 Tuch Oct 1997 A
5776184 Tuch Jul 1998 A
5824048 Tuch Oct 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5833651 Donovan et al. Nov 1998 A
5837008 Berg et al. Nov 1998 A
5843172 Yan Dec 1998 A
5851217 Wolff et al. Dec 1998 A
5851231 Wolff et al. Dec 1998 A
5871535 Wolff et al. Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5879697 Ding et al. Mar 1999 A
5900246 Lambert May 1999 A
5977163 Li et al. Nov 1999 A
5981568 Kunz et al. Nov 1999 A
5997468 Wolff et al. Dec 1999 A
6042875 Ding et al. Mar 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6099561 Alt Aug 2000 A
6099562 Ding et al. Aug 2000 A
6120536 Ding et al. Sep 2000 A
6120847 Yang et al. Sep 2000 A
6146358 Rowe Nov 2000 A
6153252 Hossainy et al. Nov 2000 A
6187370 Dinh et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206915 Fagan et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206916 Furst Mar 2001 B1
6228845 Donovan et al. May 2001 B1
6273913 Wright et al. Aug 2001 B1
6299604 Ragheb et al. Oct 2001 B1
6335029 Kamath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6355055 Waksman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6379382 Yang Apr 2002 B1
6379691 Tedeschi et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395326 Castro et al. May 2002 B1
6406754 Chappa et al. Jun 2002 B2
6908622 Barry et al. Jun 2005 B2
20020051730 Bodnar et al. May 2002 A1
20020098278 Bates et al. Jul 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
0832655 Apr 1998 EP
0850651 Jul 1998 EP
10052502 Feb 1998 JP
10192413 Jul 1998 JP
2001514936 Sep 2001 JP
WO 9407529 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9416706 Aug 1994 WO
9908729 Feb 1999 WO
0040278 Jul 2000 WO
0062830 Oct 2000 WO
0187374 Nov 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050202061 A1 Sep 2005 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10252848 Sep 2002 US
Child 11127499 US