The present invention relates to optimized biological responses as a function of dosage and release kinetics of drugs from implantable medical devices.
Stents are tubular scaffold structures used to prop open blood vessels and other body lumens. The most widespread use of stents is to open clogged coronary arteries and prevent restenosis. The use of stents coated with therapeutic agents has been proposed to help minimize the possibility of restenosis. For example, stents coated with paclitaxel have been shown to reduce restenosis rates when compared with uncoated stents.
Although a number of drug coated stents have been reported, there has been a lack of published information regarding the optimization of drug dosing and drug release kinetics to address safety and efficacy. There is thus a need to identify, for a given coated stent system, the effective therapeutic window based on the selection of an appropriate drug dose to obtain a desired biological response.
The inventors have identified preferred drug dosing and drug release profiles for the safety and efficacy of drug coated stents. The embodiments described herein are specific to metallic stents coated with paclitaxel in a polymeric carrier, but the invention is thought to be applicable to stents coated with other drugs, with or without a polymeric carrier.
In one embodiment, the invention includes a drug coated stent comprising a structural member insertable into a body lumen of a patient, and a drug coated onto at least a portion of the said structural member. The drug is released from the stent into the patient for a time period of at least eight days after insertion into the patient.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a drug coated stent, where the drug is released from the stent at a varying rate over time. The rate is preferably maximized between one and three days after insertion into the patient.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent wherein after ten days following insertion into a patient, only less than about 60 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from the stent.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent wherein after two days following insertion into a patient, only less than about 10 micrograms of paclitaxel is released from the stent.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent having a dosage of up to about 2 micrograms per square millimeter of the stent surface area.
In yet another embodiment, the invention includes a paclitaxel coated stent, wherein the paclitaxel is included in a polymer carrier and the weight fraction of the paclitaxel in the polymer carrier is less than about 35 percent.
a-2c illustrate the difference in biological response resulting from the difference in release rate from a paclitaxel coated stent.
The inventors have found that both the drug dose and drug release profiles are significant factors for the safety and efficacy of drug coated stents. The inventors have identified optimum dosing and release kinetics for drug coated stents. In particular, the inventors have determined dosing and release kinetics that permit the delivery of the lowest effective drug dosage, thus enhancing patient safety and minimizing any side effects from the drug.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the drug for coating a stent is paclitaxel. Other drugs that may be useful for treating diseases such as restenosis include known anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombogenic, anti-angiogenic, matrix production inhibatory, anti-migratory, cytostatic, and/or cytotoxic agents. Drugs currently being used or considered as stent coating materials to combat restenosis include paclitaxel, sirolimus, tacrolimus, and everolimus. The present invention is thought to be applicable to any of these restenosis inhibiting drugs.
In another preferred embodiment, the drug paclitaxel is contained in a polymer coating applied to a metallic stent. In certain embodiments, the polymer coating is a styrene-isobutylene based block copolymer, olefin polymer, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polytetrafluoroethylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene copolymer, polyvinyl acetate, polystyrene, poly(ethylene teraphthalate), polyurethane, polyurea, silicone rubbers, polyamides, polycarbonates, polyaldehydes, natural rubbers, polyester copolymers, styrene-butadiene copolymers ethylene vinyl acetate, polyorthoesters, polyiminocarbonates, aliphatic polycarbonates, polycaprolactone (PCL), poly-DL-lactic acid (DL-PLA) or poly-L-lactic acid (L-PLA), lactide, polyphosphazenes polyethylene oxide or polyethylene teraphtholate (PET), polybutylene teraphtholate (PBT), PEBAX, Nylon, or polycaprolactone, polyorthoesters, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, albumin or combinations of any of the above. In a most preferred embodiment, the polymer is a styrene-based polymer.
Paclitaxel coated metallic stents of various doses were implanted into healthy porcine arteries to determine the effect of dosage on biological response. Dosages used were approximately 4.0, 2.0, 1.0, and 0.6 micrograms per square millimeter of the stent surface area, corresponding to approximate total dosages of 345, 175, 85, and 50 micrograms per stent. The paclitaxel was contained within a styrene-isobutylene based block copolymer applied to the stent struts. As can be seen in
As the dose is decreased, the adverse effects described for the 4.0 micrograms/mm2 dose are minimized. At 2.0, 1.0, and 0.6 micrograms/mm2, there is a corresponding decrease in the effects of paclitaxel, such that endothelial cell loss, medial thinning, fibrin accumulation, and possible thrombus formation are all minimized. Based on these results, the preferred paclitaxel dosage is up to about 2.0 micrograms/mm2, more preferably less than about 1.5 micrograms/mm2, and most preferably up to about 1.0 micrograms/mm2.
In particular embodiments, the dosage is 0.4 to 2.0 micrograms/mm2, 0.7 to 1.5 micrograms/mm2, or 1.0 to 1.3 micrograms/mm2. In other embodiments, the dosage is 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, or 2.0 micrograms/mm2.
Using the 1.0 micrograms/mm2 dose as an exemplary embodiment, the effects of release rate were investigated. Metallic stents were coated with paclitaxel in a styrene-isobutylene based block copolymer carrier with the weight percent of paclitaxel in the carrier varying from approximately 8.8 to about 35%. The dose of drug applied to the stents was kept at 1.0 micrograms/mm2, and the total drug dose was held constant by varying total coating weight. The results shown in
In particular embodiments, the weight percent of paclitaxel in the carrier or polymer coating is 5% to 35%, 10% to 30%, 15% to 25%, or 18% to 22%.
As can be seen from
Based on these results, a high weight fraction of paclitaxel (35% in a polymer carrier) is acceptable, but a preferred weight fraction of paclitaxel is less than about 35% for a 1.0 micrograms/mm2 dosage, more preferably up to about 25%.
Most preferably, dosing of approximately 1.0 micrograms/mm2 of paclitaxel in a polymer coating was found to yield superior safety and efficacy. Within this dose, the preferred weight fraction of paclitaxel in this particular polymer carrier is less than about 35%. Such a combination results in the release of less than about 60 micrograms of paclitaxel within ten days after implantation, and less than about 45 micrograms within two days. As the inventors have found that lower doses lead to preferred physiologic responses, it is preferred that the coating system result in the cumulative release of less than about 20 micrograms of paclitaxel ten days after implantation, more preferably less than 15 micrograms, more preferably less than 10 micrograms, more preferably less than 8 micrograms, more preferably less than 6 micrograms, and more preferably less than 4 micrograms. It is additionally preferred that less than 10 micrograms of paclitaxel be released two days after implantation, more preferably less than 5 micrograms, and more preferably less than 2 micrograms.
Although most examples herein use a polymeric carrier to deliver paclitaxel from a coated stent, it is anticipated that the optimal dosing and release rates identified by the inventors would apply to drug coated stent systems in which no polymer carrier is used, such as where paclitaxel or another drug is applied directly to the stent in the absence of a polymer carrier.
In still other embodiments, the stent is a degradable polymer stent that contains the paclitaxel, rather than being made from a biostable material that is coated with drug.
Although the invention is described as being specific to paclitaxel, it should be recognized that the inventors' findings should be applicable to a wide variety of drug systems.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/324,095, filed Sep. 24, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4529614 | Burns | Jul 1985 | A |
4535006 | Naunapper et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
RE32307 | Glatt et al. | Dec 1986 | E |
4740207 | Kreamer | Apr 1988 | A |
4753652 | Langer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4758151 | Arru et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4795458 | Regan | Jan 1989 | A |
4888009 | Lederman et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5007926 | Derbyshire | Apr 1991 | A |
5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
5041100 | Rowland et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053048 | Pinchuk | Oct 1991 | A |
5092877 | Pinchuk | Mar 1992 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5171217 | March et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171812 | Domb | Dec 1992 | A |
5175235 | Domb et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192307 | Wall | Mar 1993 | A |
5221698 | Amidon et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226913 | Pinchuk | Jul 1993 | A |
5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
5236503 | Jones | Aug 1993 | A |
5240963 | Domb et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5272012 | Opolski | Dec 1993 | A |
5282823 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5304121 | Sahatjian | Apr 1994 | A |
5334201 | Cowan | Aug 1994 | A |
5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
5345933 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5380299 | Fearnot et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383928 | Scott et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5419760 | Narciso, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5423885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
5429634 | Narciso, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437889 | Jones | Aug 1995 | A |
5439686 | Desai et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443458 | Eury | Aug 1995 | A |
5443496 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447724 | Helmus et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457113 | Cullinan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462937 | Cullinan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464450 | Buscemi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475052 | Rhee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486191 | Pasricha et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5500013 | Buscemi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512055 | Domb et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516781 | Morris et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545208 | Wolff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545213 | Keogh et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551954 | Buscemi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554182 | Dinh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562922 | Lambert | Oct 1996 | A |
5571166 | Dinh et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575815 | Slepian et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578075 | Dayton | Nov 1996 | A |
5588962 | Nicholas et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591227 | Dinh et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599352 | Dinh et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603694 | Brown et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607417 | Batich et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607475 | Cahalan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609629 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624411 | Tuch | Apr 1997 | A |
5653760 | Saffran | Aug 1997 | A |
5679400 | Tuch | Oct 1997 | A |
5776184 | Tuch | Jul 1998 | A |
5824048 | Tuch | Oct 1998 | A |
5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833651 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837008 | Berg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843172 | Yan | Dec 1998 | A |
5851217 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851231 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871535 | Wolff et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879697 | Ding et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900246 | Lambert | May 1999 | A |
5977163 | Li et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997468 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099561 | Alt | Aug 2000 | A |
6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120847 | Yang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6146358 | Rowe | Nov 2000 | A |
6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6187370 | Dinh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206915 | Fagan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206916 | Furst | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228845 | Donovan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237913 | Kamille | May 2001 | B1 |
6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335029 | Kamath et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355055 | Waksman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379382 | Yang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379691 | Tedeschi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395326 | Castro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406754 | Chappa et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
470246 | Sep 1991 | EP |
747069 | Dec 1996 | EP |
627226 | Dec 1998 | EP |
WO 9112779 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9215286 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9013332 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO 0021584 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0045744 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0191918 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030059454 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60324095 | Sep 2001 | US |