Joint review of an electronic document often involves a single computer connected to a large-format display device, such as a projector. The program utilized to create the document, such as a word processing application program, is typically utilized to present and navigate the document under review. Document reviewers typically follow along with the display of the document on the large-format display device. In practice, this leads to all of the document reviewers viewing exactly the same content. Moreover, because the user interface provided by the document creation program is not optimized for a large-format display device, the document as presented may be difficult to read.
Some document reviewers might also opt to open a copy of the document under review on their own computing device, such as a laptop computer. The review of the document by these reviewers, however, occurs in a manner that is disconnected from the review of the document by the other reviewers. Consequently, the common joint review practices described above can lead to considerable manual navigation within the document under review, especially for long documents. Moreover, the user interface provided by the document creation program may not be configured to take advantage of enhanced capabilities provided by each reviewer's computing device.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the disclosure made herein is presented.
Technologies are described herein for enabling the joint review of documents. Through an implementation of the concepts and technologies presented herein, documents can be reviewed jointly in an efficient and effective manner. In particular, a user interface (“UI”) for presenting a document can be optimized based upon the type of computing device being utilized to present the document. For example, a UI that provides functionality for document review may be customized for use on large-format display devices and other device types. Additionally, document navigation mechanisms may be customized with support for touch-enabled display devices and gesture input, UIs for emphasizing portions of a document may be provided, and UIs may be provided for identifying the portions of the documents under review by each reviewer.
According to one aspect presented herein, a group of people, who may be referred to herein individually as “reviewers” or “document reviewers,” can jointly review an electronic document. A UI for reviewing the document can be provided that is customized based upon the type of computing device that each reviewer is utilizing. For instance, unique UIs can be provided for desktop or laptop computers, tablet computing devices, wireless mobile telephones, and large-format displays. Each UI can be customized to take advantage of the available user input mechanisms. For instance, the UIs may be optimized for touch input, gestures, and other types of input. Moreover, the location of each reviewer within a document under review may be shared between the devices, communicated to the reviewers, and utilized to assist in document navigation.
According to another aspect, a UI is provided for joint review of a document. In one implementation, the UI is configured for use on a large-format display device, such as a large touch-enabled video display. The UI includes a first UI element, such as a UI pane, showing a view of the document under review. When a large-format display device is utilized, the view may be sized and formatted for display on a large-format display device. For instance, a font style and size may be selected that are appropriate for viewing the document from a distance. Additionally, pagination and other elements traditionally associated with a paper document might not be displayed in the view of the document shown in the first UI pane. Conventional UI tools for editing a document might also be eliminated from the UI. The view of the document shown in the first UI pane may be navigated utilizing touch input, gestures, or other supported UI mechanisms.
The UI might also include a second UI element, such as a second UI pane. The second UI pane might include indicators for each of the reviewers of the document. Each indicator might include data identifying the reviewer, an image of the reviewer, data indicating the type of review being performed (e.g. reading or editing), and an indication of the type of device being utilized (e.g. a tablet or a phone). In one implementation, the selection of an indicator will cause a portion of the document being reviewed by the corresponding reviewer to be displayed in the first UI pane. In this manner, the indicators can be utilized to quickly navigate to the portion of the document under review by each of the reviewers. In alternate embodiments, one reviewer can “push” their location in a document to other reviewers, thereby allowing one reviewer to synchronize their location in a document to other reviewers. Additionally, the view shown to each reviewer might automatically follow along with the location of another reviewer.
According to another aspect, the UI also includes a third UI element, such as a third UI pane, for enabling navigation of the document shown in the first UI pane in a manner optimized for a particular display size and input type. For instance, in one embodiment the third UI pane includes a scaled image, such as a “thumbnail” image, of the document shown in the first UI pane. Selection of a portion of the scaled image causes the selected portion of the document to be displayed in the first UI pane. The UI might also be optimized for a particular display size and input type. For instance, on a large display, a visual thumbnail might be provided in the manner described above that can be utilized to quickly navigate the document with simple gestures. On a smaller display, such as a mobile telephone, the third UI pane might include a mechanism for navigating between headings in the document rather than a thumbnail. Other variations might also be utilized.
In other embodiments, the third UI pane includes a view of sections of the document. Selection of a section of the document in the third UI pane causes the selected section of the document to be displayed in the first UI pane. The third UI pane might also provide an indication of recent viewing or editing activity within the document by the reviewers. The third UI pane might also provided functionality for browsing by heading, figures, or other document elements. The view shown in the third pane might also be utilized to navigate the document independently of the view shown in the first UI pane.
According to another aspect, the first UI pane can be utilized to emphasize a portion of the document. For instance, in one embodiment a portion of the document, such as a paragraph, can be selected in the first UI pane. In response to the selection of a portion of the document, the other portions of the document shown in the first UI pane may be obfuscated. For instance, the other portions of the document may be “blurred” or “fogged” over, thereby rendering the other portions unreadable. In this manner, the attention of the reviewers may be focused on a selected portion of the document.
The UI elements disclosed herein and the user experience provided for interacting with those panes might also be customized based upon the type of device utilized by each reviewer. For example, when a sufficiently large display is available, each pane may be displayed separately or also inline with the document being reviewed. On a mobile telephone the panes may be displayed individually and UI elements may be provided for allowing a user to navigate between the panes. It should be appreciated that although UI panes have been utilized herein to describe various features, other types of UI elements such as “fly out” menus, overlays, and other types of UI elements and UI controls might also be utilized.
This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended that this Summary be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
The following detailed description is directed to technologies for optimized joint document review. As discussed briefly above, a UI for presenting and reviewing a document is disclosed herein that is optimized based upon the type of computing device being utilized to present the document. One such UI includes a first pane showing a view of the document under review that is sized and formatted for display on a large-format display device. The first pane can also be utilized to emphasize a portion of the document. The UI also includes a second pane that includes indicators for each of the reviewers of the document. The selection of an indicator will cause a portion of the document being reviewed by the corresponding reviewer to be displayed in the first pane. The UI also includes a third pane that includes a scaled image of the document shown in the first pane. Selection of a portion of the scaled image causes the selected portion of the document to be displayed in the first pane. Additional details regarding this UI and others will be provided below.
While the subject matter described herein is presented in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with the execution of an operating system and application programs on a computer system, those skilled in the art will recognize that other implementations may be performed in combination with other types of program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the subject matter described herein may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like.
In the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments or examples. Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements through the several figures, aspects of a computing system and methodology for optimized joint document review will be described.
As shown in
In one implementation, a meeting server 108 is utilized to coordinate the review of the document 120. In this regard, the meeting server 108 may execute a meeting service 118. Through the use of the meeting service 118, a meeting may be scheduled for reviewing the document 120. Appropriate invitations may be sent to the individuals that will be reviewing the document 120. The meeting server 108 might also provide other functionality for facilitating, scheduling, and managing a document review meeting. It should be appreciated that while the document 120 is illustrated in
It should be appreciated that each of the computing devices illustrated in
The smartphone 110 might also support touch input, but typically includes a small-scale display screen. In other embodiments, the smartphone 110 might not provide touch input. The tablet computer 112 might provide touch input on a medium-sized display screen and the desktop/laptop computer 114 may or may not be equipped with touch input and may provide a medium-sized display.
As will be described in greater detail below, the editing program 116 provides a UI for presenting and collaboratively reviewing the document 120 that is optimized based upon the type of computing device utilized to present the document. For instance, in one implementation, a UI is provided for document review that is customized for use on the large-format display device 102. In alternative embodiments, the UI might be customized for use on the smartphone 110, the tablet computer 112, and the desktop/laptop computer 114.
As will also be described in greater detail below, the editing program 116 executing on each of the devices in
It should be appreciated that although
The pane 202A may be utilized to navigate the contents of the document 120. For instance, a touch enabled large-format display device 102 may be utilized to make input into the pane 202A for scrolling the visible portion of the document 120 up or down. As an example, a “swipe” touch gesture might be utilized to scroll the view of the document 120 shown in the pane 202A. Other types of gestures might also be made into the pane 202A to scroll the view of the document 120 visible within the pane 202A.
According to one implementation, no editing of the document 120 is permitted within the pane 202A. According to another embodiment, simple editing functionality may be provided within the pane 202A, such as functionality for generating an ink drawing, highlighting a portion of the document 120, or inserting comments into the document 120. In general, it should be appreciated, however, that the pane 202A is configured in a manner so as to avoid inadvertent modification of the document 120.
As shown in
According to one implementation disclosed herein, the indicators 204A-204C may be selected in order to navigate the view of the document 120 shown in the pane 202A to the portion of the document currently being reviewed by the corresponding reviewer. For instance, the indicator 204A may be selected. In response there to, the portion of the document 120 shown in the pane 202A may be modified to show the portion of the document 120 currently being read by the user named “Joe”. Likewise, the indicator 204C might be selected in order to cause the view of the document 120 shown in the pane 202A to reflect the portion of the document 120 being read by the user named “Nathan” on his tablet 112. In this manner, the indicators 204A-204C can be utilized to quickly navigate to the portion of the document 120 under review by each of the reviewers.
It should be appreciated that, in alternate embodiments, one reviewer can “push” their location in a document to other reviewers, thereby allowing one reviewer to synchronize their location in a document to other reviewers. For instance, a reviewer utilizing a mobile telephone to review a document could “push” their location in the document to other reviewers using desktop computers or other types of devices. Additionally, the view shown to each reviewer might automatically follow along with the location of another reviewer.
As also shown in
In one implementation, the pane 202C also includes a traditional scroll bar 212 in the event that the scaled image 208 exceeds the available space in the pane 202C. The scroll bar 212 may be utilized to scroll the view of the scaled image 208. The pane 202C might also include a UI control 214 for modifying the font size of the view of the document 120 shown in the pane 202A, a UI control 216 for hiding the pane 202B, a UI control for editing the document 120 in the editing program 116, and a UI control 220 for setting other options regarding the operation of the UI 220.
According to other embodiments, the pane 202C might include a visualization of sections or elements within the document 120. For instance, the pane 202C might include a visualization of the pages, headers, embedded content, comments, sections, or other elements within the document 120. By selecting any of the visualizations within the pane 202C, a user may quickly modify the view of the document 120 shown in the pane 202A to reflect the selected portion of the document. In this manner, the pane 202C may be utilized to quickly navigate to virtually any portion of the document 120. The pane 202C might also provide an indication of the portion of the document 120 currently being reviewed by each reviewer.
It should be appreciated that the UI elements disclosed herein and the user experience provided for interacting with those panes might also be customized based upon the type of device utilized by each reviewer. For example, when a sufficiently large display is available, each pane may be displayed separately or also inline with the document being reviewed. On a mobile telephone the panes may be displayed individually and UI elements may be provided for allowing a user to navigate between the panes.
The indicators 304A-304C may include images or text identifying the user, the type of review in progress, the type of device upon which the review is being performed, and other information. The pane 302A might also include UI controls for performing other review and related tasks, such as a UI control 306 for screen sharing, a UI control 308 for requesting that other users open the document 120, a UI control 310 for opening a meeting, and a UI control 312 for opening other meeting files.
The UI 300 shown in
In the example shown in
In response to receiving a request to emphasize the selected portion 402A, the editing program 116 is configured to obfuscate the other portions of the document 120 displayed in the UI 400. For instance, the portion 402B of the document 120 may be “blurred” or “fogged” over, thereby rendering the portion 402B of the document 120 unreadable. Additionally, the text size or other visual attributes of the portion 402A may be emphasized. For instance, the font size of text within the portion 402 may be increased. Additionally, separators 404A-404B may be displayed to further distinguish the portion 402A of the document 120 from the remaining portion 402B of the document 120. It should be appreciated that other types of visual effects might also be applied to the non-selected portion 402B of the document 120. A UI control 406 might also be displayed which, when selected, will cause the emphasis to the portion 402A to be removed from the UI 400. In this manner, the attention of the reviewers may be focused on the selected portion 402A of the document 120.
It should be appreciated that the user interfaces as illustrated in
The routine 500 begins at operation 502, where the editing program 116 is launched on the various devices utilized to review the document 120. For instance, as described above, the editing program 116 may be launched on the large-format display controller 106, the smartphone 110, the tablet computer 112, and the desktop/laptop computer 114. Once the editing program 116 has been launched, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 504.
At operation 504, the editing program 116 retrieves the document 120 to be jointly reviewed. The routine 500 then proceeds to operation 506 where the editing program 116 identifies the device type, display form factor, and input devices of the device upon which it is executing. Once these items have been identified, the routine 500 then proceeds to operation 508 where the editing program 116 provides a user interface customized for reviewing the document 120 that is suitable for the display and user input mechanisms provided by the identified device. For instance as described above, the UI 200 shown in
From operation 508, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 510. At operation 510, the editing program 116 executing on each device provides an indication to the other devices as to the location in the document currently being reviewed. Each of the editing programs 116 receives this information and provides an indication as to the location in the document of the other reviewers. For instance, the contents of the pane 202B described above with reference to
From operation 510, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 512 where the editing program 116 also provides other UI features for navigating the document 120 and emphasizing portions of the document 120 for review. These features may be based upon the particular device type upon which each instance of the editing program 116 is executing. These features were described above with reference to
The computer architecture shown in
The mass storage device 610 is connected to the CPU 602 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to the bus 604. The mass storage device 610 and its associated computer-readable storage media provide non-volatile storage for the computer 600. Although the description of computer-readable media contained herein refers to a mass storage device, such as a hard disk or CD-ROM drive, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that computer-readable storage media can be any available computer storage media that can be accessed by the computer 600.
By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable storage media may include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. For example, computer-readable storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (“DVD”), HD-DVD, BLU-RAY, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transitory medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer 600.
It should be appreciated that the computer-readable media disclosed herein also encompasses communication media. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media. Computer-readable storage media does not encompass communication media.
According to various embodiments, the computer 600 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through a network such as the network 620. The computer 600 may connect to the network 620 through a network interface unit 606 connected to the bus 604. It should be appreciated that the network interface unit 606 may also be utilized to connect to other types of networks and remote computer systems. The computer 600 may also include an input/output controller 612 for receiving and processing input from a number of other devices, including a keyboard, mouse, or electronic stylus (not shown in
As mentioned briefly above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in the mass storage device 610 and RAM 614 of the computer 600, including an operating system 618 suitable for controlling the operation of a networked desktop, laptop, or server computer. The mass storage device 610 and RAM 614 may also store one or more program modules. In particular, the mass storage device 610 and the RAM 614 may store the document editing program 116, the meeting service 118, and/or the other software components described above. The mass storage device 610 and RAM 614 may also store other program modules and data, such as the document 120.
In general, software applications or modules may, when loaded into the CPU 602 and executed, transform the CPU 602 and the overall computer 600 from a general-purpose computing system into a special-purpose computing system customized to perform the functionality presented herein. The CPU 602 may be constructed from any number of transistors or other discrete circuit elements, which may individually or collectively assume any number of states. More specifically, the CPU 602 may operate as one or more finite-state machines, in response to executable instructions contained within the software or modules. These computer-executable instructions may transform the CPU 602 by specifying how the CPU 602 transitions between states, thereby physically transforming the transistors or other discrete hardware elements constituting the CPU 602.
Encoding the software or modules onto a mass storage device may also transform the physical structure of the mass storage device or associated computer readable storage media. The specific transformation of physical structure may depend on various factors, in different implementations of this description. Examples of such factors may include, but are not limited to: the technology used to implement the computer readable storage media, whether the computer readable storage media are characterized as primary or secondary storage, and the like. For example, if the computer readable storage media is implemented as semiconductor-based memory, the software or modules may transform the physical state of the semiconductor memory, when the software is encoded therein. For example, the software may transform the states of transistors, capacitors, or other discrete circuit elements constituting the semiconductor memory.
As another example, the computer readable storage media may be implemented using magnetic or optical technology. In such implementations, the software or modules may transform the physical state of magnetic or optical media, when the software is encoded therein. These transformations may include altering the magnetic characteristics of particular locations within given magnetic media. These transformations may also include altering the physical features or characteristics of particular locations within given optical media, to change the optical characteristics of those locations. Other transformations of physical media are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present description, with the foregoing examples provided only to facilitate this discussion.
Based on the foregoing, it should be appreciated that technologies for optimized joint document review have been presented herein. Although the subject matter presented herein has been described in language specific to computer structural features, methodological acts, and computer readable media, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features, acts, or media described herein. Rather, the specific features, acts and mediums are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
The subject matter described above is provided by way of illustration only and should not be construed as limiting. Various modifications and changes may be made to the subject matter described herein without following the example embodiments and applications illustrated and described, and without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/968,287, filed Dec. 15, 2010, and entitled “Optimized Joint Document Review,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4540850 | Herr et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4831552 | Scully et al. | May 1989 | A |
4974173 | Stefik | Nov 1990 | A |
5008853 | Bly | Apr 1991 | A |
5107443 | Smith | Apr 1992 | A |
5280583 | Nakayama | Jan 1994 | A |
5297250 | Leroy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337407 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339389 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339391 | Wroblewski | Aug 1994 | A |
5495269 | Elrod et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5566291 | Boulton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5644692 | Eick | Jul 1997 | A |
5675752 | Scott et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704029 | Wright, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717869 | Moran et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742777 | Eick | Apr 1998 | A |
5772446 | Rosen | Jun 1998 | A |
5793369 | Atkins | Aug 1998 | A |
5802299 | Logan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821925 | Carey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821932 | Pittore | Oct 1998 | A |
5872924 | Nakayama | Feb 1999 | A |
5893098 | Peters et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907324 | Larson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6016478 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018346 | Moran et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049334 | Bates | Apr 2000 | A |
6072463 | Glaser | Jun 2000 | A |
6119147 | Toomey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6192395 | Lerner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208339 | Atlas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230185 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6310633 | Graham | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6353436 | Reichlen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6466250 | Hein | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6553417 | Gampper | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564246 | Varma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6633315 | Sobeski et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6670970 | Bonura et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6735615 | Iwayama et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738075 | Torres et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
7035865 | Doss et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036076 | Anwar | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7051285 | Harrison et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058891 | O'Neal | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073127 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075513 | Silfverberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124164 | Chemtob | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7171567 | Bayer et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7203479 | Deeds | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225257 | Aoike et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228492 | Graham | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233933 | Horvitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242389 | Stern | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246316 | Furlong et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248677 | Randall et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251786 | Wynn et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257769 | Caspi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269787 | Amitay et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299193 | Cragun et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299405 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7299418 | Dieberger | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7401300 | Nurmi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421069 | Vernon | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426297 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7451183 | Romero et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451186 | Morinigo et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454439 | Gansner et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7466334 | Baba | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469222 | Glazer | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7478129 | Chemtob | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7496841 | Hadfield | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512906 | Baier et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7551187 | Agrawala | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554576 | Erol et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571210 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590941 | Wee et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599989 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606862 | Swearingen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7627830 | Espinoza et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7636754 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640502 | Xu | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640506 | Pratley | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7669141 | Pegg | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7679518 | Pabla et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7730411 | Chotai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743098 | Anglin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764247 | Blanco et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770116 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774221 | Miller et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774703 | Junuzovic et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818678 | Massand | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7869941 | Coughlin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7911409 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7937663 | Parker | May 2011 | B2 |
7941399 | Bailor et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962525 | Kansal | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7984387 | Batthish et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992089 | Murray et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032832 | Russ et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8086960 | Gopalakrishna | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8099458 | Burtner, IV et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126974 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8150719 | Perrella et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161419 | Palahnuk et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8204942 | Roskind et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214748 | Srikanth et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8330795 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352870 | Bailor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358762 | Renner et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8385964 | Haney | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8423883 | Stockman | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8437461 | Gartner et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8452839 | Heikes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8560487 | Jhoney et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583148 | Ollila et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606517 | Ehrlacher et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8631119 | Malkin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8667401 | Lozben | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8682973 | Kikin-Gil et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688694 | Dexter | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8768308 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775511 | Vernon | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9118612 | Fish et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9189143 | Jones | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9342267 | Huang | May 2016 | B2 |
9383888 | Fish et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
10152190 | Jones | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10505998 | Ackerman | Dec 2019 | B1 |
20010040592 | Foreman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020049786 | Bibliowicz | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020067380 | Graham | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020143876 | Boyer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143877 | Hackbarth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030020805 | Mien et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046296 | Doss et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105816 | Goswami | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122863 | Dieberger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137539 | Dees | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142133 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158900 | Santos | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179230 | Seidman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220973 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222890 | Salesin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024822 | Werndorfer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027370 | Jaeger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030992 | Moisa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040062383 | Sylvain | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085354 | Massand | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128350 | Topfl et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133601 | Graham | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150627 | Luman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161090 | Digate et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169683 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175036 | Graham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194033 | Holzwarth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196286 | Guzik | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230594 | Flam et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250201 | Caspi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254998 | Horvitz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263636 | Cutler et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267701 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005025 | Harville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018828 | Nierhaus et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055625 | Kloss | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081160 | Wee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091571 | Leichtling | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125246 | Muller et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125717 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138109 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138570 | Good et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171830 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050285845 | Dehlin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004911 | Becker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010023 | Tromczynski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010197 | Ovenden | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026253 | Kessen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053196 | Spataro | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067250 | Boyer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080610 | Kaminsky | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082594 | Vafiadis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094441 | Beckmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132507 | Wang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136828 | Asano | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139375 | Rasmussen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143064 | Mock et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146765 | Van De Sluis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161585 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167996 | Drsolini et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168533 | Yip et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171515 | Hintermeister et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184872 | Dontcheva et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190547 | Bhogal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195587 | Cadiz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060234735 | Digate et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239212 | Pirzada et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259875 | Collins et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265398 | Kaufman | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282759 | Collins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005752 | Chawla et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011231 | Manion et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033091 | Ravikumar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044017 | Zhu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083597 | Salesky et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100937 | Burtner et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109939 | Shimizu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112926 | Brett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150583 | Asthana et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168447 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174389 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185870 | Hogue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186007 | Field | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186171 | Junuzovic et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189487 | Sharland et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214423 | Teplov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216675 | Sun | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226032 | White et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226299 | Shaffer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245238 | Fugitt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253424 | Herat et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271503 | Harmon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276909 | Chavda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279416 | Cobb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294612 | Drucker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300185 | Macbeth et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001717 | Fiatal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005235 | Hegde et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008458 | Gudipaty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013698 | Holtzberg | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022225 | Erl | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028314 | Bono | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040187 | Carraher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040188 | Klausmeier | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046828 | Bibliowicz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059889 | Parker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065580 | Spence et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084984 | Levy et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098328 | Rollin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109406 | Krishnasamy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114844 | Sanchez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115076 | Frank et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133551 | Wensley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136897 | Morishima et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141126 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148146 | Estrada | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177782 | Poston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189624 | Chotai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080239995 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244442 | Veselova et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263010 | Roychoudhuri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263460 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276174 | Hintermeister et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288889 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300944 | Surazski et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303746 | Schlottmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307322 | Stochosky et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320082 | Kuhlke et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006980 | Hawley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006982 | Curtis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019367 | Cavagnar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030766 | Denner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043856 | Darby | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055739 | Murillo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089055 | Caspi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094367 | Song et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109180 | Do et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119255 | Frank et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119604 | Simard et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129596 | Chavez et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138552 | Johnson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138826 | Barros | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144654 | Brouwer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199078 | Caspi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204465 | Pradhan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204671 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210822 | Schindler | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222741 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228569 | Kalmanje et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234721 | Bigelow et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235155 | Ueda | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235177 | Saul et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090251457 | Walker | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254840 | Churchill | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254843 | Van Wie et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265632 | Russ et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282339 | Van Melle et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309846 | Trachtenberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313584 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327019 | Addae et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327425 | Gudipaty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005169 | Von Hilgers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100031152 | Villaron et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037151 | Ackerman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037153 | Rogers | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058201 | Harvey et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079467 | Boss et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095198 | Bultrowicz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097331 | Wu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138756 | Saund et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149307 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192107 | Takahashi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199191 | Takahashi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205667 | Anderson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235216 | Hehmeyer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235763 | Massand | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241968 | Tarara et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251140 | Tipirneni | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268705 | Douglas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295958 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306004 | Burtner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306018 | Burtner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324963 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332977 | Nelson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110087764 | Yaffe | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107241 | Moore | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113351 | Phillips | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137894 | Narayanan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154180 | Evanitsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154192 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167366 | Wagner | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185288 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185297 | Reid | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110212430 | Smithmier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225494 | Shmuylovich | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239142 | Steeves et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110282871 | Seefeld et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289404 | Fleur | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295879 | Logis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017149 | Lai | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120075337 | Rasmussen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120144325 | Mital et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150577 | Berg et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150863 | Fish et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159347 | Fish et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166985 | Friend et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120233543 | Vagell et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254858 | Moyers | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130035853 | Stout et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130091205 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091440 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091465 | Kikin-Gil et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097544 | Parker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101978 | Ahl et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130111360 | Kodama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124978 | Horns et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125051 | Kelley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132455 | Mangini | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132814 | Mangini | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132886 | Mangini et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130246903 | Mukai | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140032481 | Lang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033067 | Pittenger | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033088 | Shaver | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140129645 | Mo | May 2014 | A1 |
20140207867 | Kotler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140362165 | Ackerman | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150127628 | Rathod | May 2015 | A1 |
20150293650 | Dukhovny | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309766 | Huang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160011766 | Kosaka | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1886977 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101198976 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101363739 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101364886 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101515226 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101789871 | Jul 2010 | CN |
1517260 | Mar 2005 | EP |
04257046 | Sep 1992 | JP |
2010176320 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2005139793 | Jun 2007 | RU |
02061682 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2007092470 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Author: David S. Miller, John G. Smith, and Michael J. Muller Title: TelePICTIVE: Computer-Supported Collaborative GUI, Design for Designers with Diverse Expertise Date: Nov. 1992 pp. 115-160 (Year: 1992). |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, dated Jan. 24, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, dated Jul. 24, 2014, 10 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 8 pages. |
“Free PhotoMesa 3.1.2 (Windows)”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20071209231951/http://www.windsorinterfaces.com/photomesa.shtml, 2007, 2 pages. |
“FREEPATH-EDU Nonlinear Presentation Software”, Grass Roots Software, 2008, 3 pages. |
“GeoTime”, Retrieved at: https://web.archive.org/web/20101219085705/http://www.geotime.com/Product- /GeoTime-%281%29/Features---Benefits.aspx, 2009, 10 pages. |
“GoToMeeting”, Retrieved from: <http://www.gotomeeting.com/fec/online_meeting> on Oct. 11, 2010, 1 page. |
“Human and Technical Factors of Distributed Group Drawing Tools”, Retrieved From: http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/grouplab/uploads/Publications/Publications/1992-HumanTech.IWC.pdf, 1992, 29 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2009/046529, Nov. 30, 2009, 11 pages. |
“Meet mimio—The Digital Meeting Assistant”, Mayflower Business Systems Limited; http://www.kda.co.uk/mimio1/whitepaper.html, (May 1999), 10 pages. |
“Meeting Center Using Video in Your Meetings”, Retrieved From: http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/webex/Windows/Video.pdf, May 13, 2009, 2 pages. |
“Meeting Management Software”, Retrieved from: <http://workingsmarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2004/12/meeting_managem.html> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Dec. 10, 2004), 2 pages. |
“Microsoft Office Communicator 2007 Getting Started Guide”, retrieved from http://www.ittdublin.ie/media/Media,22233,en.pdf, (Jul. 2007), 77 pages. |
“Microsoft® Office Live Meeting Feature Guide”, Microsoft Corporation, Available at <http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/0/3/803f9ba6-5e12-4b40-84d9-d8a91073e3dc/LiveMeeting.doc>, (Jan. 2005), pp. 1-17. |
“Mindshift Innovation”, Retrieved From: http://mindshiftinnovation.blogspot.com/2007/09/seadragon.html, Apr. 4, 2007, 2 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed Oct. 14, 2011, 24 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Mar. 3, 2009, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Feb. 4, 2011, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Mar. 13, 2012, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Sep. 25, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, filed Oct. 5, 2011, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, filed Sep. 16, 2014, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed May 9, 2011, 28 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Jul. 31, 2014, 41 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Apr. 9, 2015, 55 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed Feb. 14, 2013, 29 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Jun. 4, 2012, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Dec. 20, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Oct. 2, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Jun. 20, 2013, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Mar. 13, 2015, 21 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Jul. 23, 2012, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Dec. 5, 2013, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Oct. 9, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,308, filed Aug. 31, 2012, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, filed Apr. 11, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, filed Aug. 14, 2014, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, filed Aug. 12, 2013, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, filed Jul. 18, 2014, 5 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Apr. 10, 2015, 15 pages. |
“Notice on Reexamination”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, dated Aug. 24, 2015, 9 pages. |
“Notice on Reexamination”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, dated Jan. 4, 2016, 10 Pages. |
“Online Calendar & Group Scheduling”, MOSAIC Technologies, retrieved from <http://www.webexone.com/Brandded/ID.asp?brandid=2348&pg=%20AppCalendar> on Apr. 24, 2009, 4 pages. |
“ProShow Producer Feature Overview”, Photodex Corporation: http://www.photodex.com/products/producer/features.html, 2008, 2 pages. |
“The Beginner's Guide to Data Visualization”, Retrieved From: http://www.tableausoftware.com/beginners-data-visualization, 2010, 10 pages. |
“Visualize and Map SalesForce Leads with SpatiaiKey”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20101120170237/http://www.spatialkey.com/support/tutorials/visualize-and-map-salesforce-leads-with-spatialkey-part-ii, 2010, 7 pages. |
“ZuiPrezi Nonlinear Presentation Editor”, ZuiPrezi Ltd., http://zuiprezi.kibu.hu/, 2007, 2 pages. |
Adams, Lia et al., “Distributed Research Teams: Meeting Asynchronously in Virtual Space”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, (1999), 17 pages. |
Author: Adam Pash Title: Google Docs Updates With a Drawing Editor, Real-Time Collaboration, Speed Date: Apr. 13, 2010, pp. 1-5. |
“Adobe Connect”, Retrieved from: <http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/> on 10/1110, (Sep. 16, 2010), 3 pages. |
“Adobe ConnectNow”, Retrieved from: <http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/> on Oct. 13, 2010, (2010), 6 pages. |
“An Overview of Aabel 3Features”, Retreived From: http://www.gigawiz.com/aabel3.html, Aug. 9, 2011, 21 pages. |
“Aquatic Sugar: The Children's Interface, Translated for Adults”, Retrieved From: http://www.olpcnews.com/software/operating_system/aquatic_sugar_childrens_interface.html, Nov. 7, 2007, 5 pages. |
“Cisco Context-Aware Mobility Solution: Presence Applications”, retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns788/brochure_c22-497557.html on Sep. 7, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Collaboration within the Telepresence Experience”, Retrieved From: http://www.wrplatinum.com/downloads/11056.aspx, Jan. 2010, 11 pages. |
“CounterPoint User Manual”, Retrieved From: http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, 2005, 21 pages. |
“CounterPoint: A Zooming Presentation Tool”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20050205082738/www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, Feb. 5, 2005, 3 pages. |
“Create Treemaps Using Easy Drag-and-drop Interactions”, Retrieved From: http://www.magnaview.nl/treemap/, 2010, 1 page. |
“CSS Max-width Property”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20070608101036/http://www.w3schools.com/, 2007, 1 page. |
“Datapoint version 1.1”, Retrieved From: http://www.filedudes.com/DataPoint-download-20853.html, 1997-2007, 2 pages. |
“Description for SharePoint Meeting Manager”, Retrieved from: <http://www.softpicks.net/software/Business/Project-Management/SharePoint-Meeting-Manager-47146.htm> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Jul. 27, 2009), 2 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 09803312.9, dated Jul. 7, 2011, 6 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Feb. 24, 2011, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Sep. 6, 2011, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Nov. 20, 2012, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Aug. 11, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, filed Mar. 28, 2012, 16 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Dec. 7, 2011, 36 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Oct. 8, 2015, 39 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed Feb. 8, 2012, 28 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed Jun. 20, 2013, 42 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Nov. 8, 2012, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Jun. 5, 2014, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Mar. 11, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Dec. 3, 2013, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Jul. 2, 2015, 24 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Aug. 1, 2013, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Jul. 17, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,308, filed Apr. 9, 2013, 21 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, filed Feb. 14, 2014, 26 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, filed Dec. 30, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, dated Apr. 1, 2015, 4 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, dated Jun. 4, 2015, 6 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, RU Application No. 2011103151, dated Sep. 4, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, dated Aug. 31, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, dated Jan. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, dated Jul. 23, 2013, 8 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, dated Nov. 21, 2013, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, dated Feb. 8, 2014, 13 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, dated Sep. 17, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, dated Nov. 15, 2014, 6 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, dated Jan. 6, 2014, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, dated Sep. 12, 2014, 12 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, dated Mar. 16, 2015, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, dated May 27, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, dated Nov. 27, 2014, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, dated May 18, 2015, 14 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, dated Oct. 20, 2015, 12 Pages. |
Bell, David et al., “Sensory Semantic User Interfaces (SenSUI) (position paper)”, Fluidity Research Group; Brunel University, Oct. 20, 2009, 14 pages. |
Bergmann et al., “Automated Assistance for the Telemeeting Lifecycle”, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (Oct. 1994), pp. 373-384. |
Bunzel, Tom, “Using Quindi Meeting Capture”, retrieved from http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=msoffice&segNum=220, 09/02/3006, 3 pages. |
Derthick et al., “An Interactive Visualization Environment for Data Exploration”, Retrieved From: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/?sage/KDD97.html, Aug. 1997, 10 pages. |
Fernando et al., “Narrowcasting Attributes for Presence Awareness in Collaborative Virtual Environments pdf”, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4019930, 2006, 6 pages. |
Fruchter, Renate, “Brick & Bits & Interaction (BBI)”, http://www.ii.ist.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/sid/sid2001/papers/positions/brickbitsinteraction.pdf, (2001), 4 pages. |
Geyer et al., “Activity Explorer: Activity-centric Collaboration from Research to Product”, IBM Systems Journal, IBM® Retrieved From: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/454/geyer.html., 2006, 26 pages. |
Good et al., “CounterPoint: Creating Jazzy Interactive Presentations”, Retrieved From: http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/1121/2/CS-TR-4225.pdf, 2001-2003, 9 pages. |
Hewagamage, “Interactive Visualization of Spatiotemporal Patterns Using Spirals on a Geographical Map”, Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages, 1999, 8 pages. |
Hupfer, “Introducing Collaboration into an Application Development Environment”, Retrieved From: http://pnexpert.com/files/IBM_Contextual_Collaboration.pdf, Nov. 6-10, 2004, 4 pages. |
Ionescu, Arna et al., “Workspace Navigator: Tools for Capture, Recall and Reuse using Spatial Cues in an Interactive Workspace”, Stanford Technical Report TR2002-04, http://bcj.stanford.edu/research/wkspcNavTR.pdf, (2002), 16 pages. |
Izadi et al., “Dynamo: A public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media”, Retrieved From: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/132613/p159-izadi.pdf, 2003, 10 pages. |
Ju, Wendy et al., “Where the Wild Things Work: Capturing Shared Physical Design Workspaces”, Stanford University, CSCW '04, (Nov. 6-10), pp. 533-541. |
Karlson et al., “Courier: A collaborative Phone-Based File Exchange System”, Retrieved at <<http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:Mb2OKecuT1kJ:citeseerx.- ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1146.360%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3D- pdf+collaborative+document+navigation+visual+display+participant+device&hl-=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgArWqUU1B_J2heHCEm78A3YhBLNjwOzrUuQeMSHPm8FebYGzDX9mSFKGG6RLq1l3MU25cyntlHk5zlolmCFFyGe8wyfYgwMNhwzx8McZbUIL0Og1zr7WR7-http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.146.360&rep=rep1&type=pdf. |
Kim, Hyun H. et al., “SmartMeeting: CMPT 481/811 Automatic Meeting Recording System”, http://www.cs.usask.ca/grads/hyk564/homePage/811/CMPT%20811%20final.doc, (2004), 7 pages. |
Little, “High-End Business Intelligence with Data Visualization for WPF 4”, Retrieved From: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/90591/High-End-Business-Intelligence-with-Data-Visualization, Jun. 29, 2010, 7 pages. |
Mitrovic, Nikola et al., “Adaptive User Interface for Mobile Devices”, retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.140.4996&rep=rep- 1&type=pdf, (2002), 15 pages. |
Moran et al., “Tailorable Domain Objects as Meeting Tools for an Electronic Whiteboard”, Retrieved From: http://pdf.aminer.org/000/121/871/tailorable_domain_objects_as_meeting_tools_for_an_electronic_whiteboard.pdf, 1998, 10 pages. |
Nelson, “Just Around the Comer: Visual Fusion 4.5”, Retrieved From: http://www.idvsolutions.com/Company/Newsletters/2009/Q3/Vfx45Silverlight.aspx, Sep. 30, 2009, 6 pages. |
Peddemors, A.J.H. et al., “Presence, Location and Instant Messaging in a Context-Aware Application Framework”, retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.11.1.98.3321&rep=rep1-&type=pdf; 4th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, MDM, (2003), 6 pages. |
Rudnicky, Alexander I. et al., “Intelligently Integrating Information from Speech and Vision to Perform Light-weight Meeting Understanding”, retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (Oct. 2005), 6 pages. |
Shaw, “Create Pan and Zoom Effects in PowerPoint”, Retrieved From: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint-help/create-pan-and-zoom-effects-in-powerpoint-HA010232631.aspx, 2007, 13 pages. |
Thomas et al., “Through-Walls Collaboration”, Retrieved From: http://www.tinmith.net/papers/piekarski-pervasive-2009.pdf, 2009, 8 pages. |
Watson, Richard, “What is Mobile Presence?”, Retrieved from http://reseller.tmcnet.com/topics/unified-communications/articles/54033-what-mobile-presence.htm, (Apr. 10, 2009), 4 pages. |
Wempen, “PowerPoint 2007 Bible”, John Wiley & Sons, Feb. 27, 2007, 27 pages. |
Werle et al., “Active Documents Supporting Teamwork in a Ubiquitous Computing Environment”, Retrieved at <<http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:iyt-5ZWZURYJ:citeseerx.ist.psu.-edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.157.4661%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf+sma- rt+layout+document+conference+meeting+where+participant+is+within+the+docu-ment&h1=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShctdCPK5oM1kGncxGqgHps9wl1DPOjAHtQXOxazPZIShLb_4JN551ty2XiA7lnxhttp://www.pcc.1th.se/events/workshops/2001/pccposters/Werlr.pdf. |
Weverka, “PowerPoint 2007 All-in-One Desk Reference for Dummies”, Published by Wiley Publishing, Jan. 2007, 8 pages. |
Yu, Shoou-Jong et al., “Who Said What When? Capturing Important Moments of a Meeting”, retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=silicon_valley; Technical Report, (Apr. 10-15, 2010), 7 pages. |
Zenghong, Wu et al., “Context Awareness and Modeling in Self-Adaptive Geo-Information Visualization”, retrieved from http://icaci.org/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/refer/17_1.pdf on Aug. 30, 2010, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Amendment and Response filed May 7, 2014, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Amendment and Response filed Jul. 15, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Amendment and Response filed Apr. 13, 2015, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Amendment and Response filed Aug. 31, 2015, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Amendment and Response filed Dec. 22, 2015, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Amendment and Response filed Feb. 12, 2016, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 1, 2016, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014, 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014, 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2015, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2015, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015, 22 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160299640 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12968287 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 15187990 | US |