Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention relates to combustion engines primarily; and to pumps, compressors, and fluid driven motors secondarily.
Internal combustion engines are used in enormous numbers as a means of converting combustible fuel energy into rotary mechanical motion useful for a multitude of industrial and transportation tasks. These have become almost universally s as one or more units of a piston reciprocating in a cylinder where combustion takes place, the reciprocating motion of the piston being converted to rotary output motion by means of a connecting rod and crankshaft. In the earliest days, before 1900, this system was well adapted as a replacement for stationary steam engines, after which it was patterned, being slow, heavy, and easily repairable by local blacksmiths.
After 1900 came the advent of the mass-produced automobile and motorcycle and the new sports of racing these. With these incentives, and through monumental amounts of both trial and error and modern technology, the crankshaft engine has gradually developed surprising reliability, efficiency, and light weight. Yet, it is clear that it is still NOT an optimum arrangement, especially as single cylinder units and for two-stroke use. Standard connecting rod crankshaft engines suffer from numerous disadvantages and limitations:
(a) Standard engines have excessive vibration, especially as single cylinder units. The piston as it accelerates and decelerates creates reciprocating inertia forces, which cannot be balanced by the rotary motion of crankshaft counterweights. Such counterweights normally balance near 50% of reciprocating weight, but add vibration in other directions. Vibration of small engines contribute to operator fatigue, noise levels, short life span, and various and often unpredictable maintenance problems. Due to vibration problems, drive engines often are isolated from the load they drive, meaning a larger and less efficient system than integral construction would be.
(b) Heavy inertia-storage flywheels are added to smooth out vibrations and allow smooth running at lower speeds, especially in the case of Diesel (compression ignition) types. Also crankshafts are often built with added weight for flywheel effect and torsional stiffness, but as energy storage varies as the square of the distance from center of rotation, this added weight near the center of rotation is far from the optimum location, as the rim of a flywheel would be. Together these add to engine weight, inefficient use of this weight, cost, size, and complexity.
(c) In spite of the fact that a large diameter tubular shaft is the most efficient for rigidity and power transmission, an engines due to their configuration transmit power out of a closed crankcase by a sealed small diameter shaft, and then must attach a larger diameter power output hub. This entails splines, keyways, cutting threads, etc. Generally another separate component is also attached for fan, ignition, starter mechanism, accessory drive, etc. Ts results in added weight and s machining, with oil seals and added parts at both ends of the crankshaft.
(d) In crankshaft engines operating with a vertical output shaft, vibration due to inherent imbalance is transmitted horizontally, adding to machine operator discomfort and maintenance problems, including lubricating oil leakage.
(e) Crankshaft engines for industrial use with a single cylinder seldom produce more than 15 horsepower, due to vibration problems as size increases. Yet efficient multi-cylinder engines of 50 or even over 100 horsepower per cylinder are common, showing that with less vibration larger single cylinder engines would be viable, with great advantages of simplicity and economy over small multi-cylinder units.
(f) Where smooth operation is a concern multiple cylinders—three or more—are added to try to balance out and thus partially solve this vibration problem, at an expense and complexity uneconomical for small power needs. Also, adding additional cylinders contributes to additional harmonic vibrations which can lead to fatigue failure and must be carefully tested and analyzed, leading to longer development times and sometimes operating restrictions, as in the case of aircraft engines.
(g) Crankshaft engine piston speed variations are inappropriate. With the connecting rod and crankshaft system piston speed varies between top and bottom phases of the stroke, and is actually fastest near the top, when a slower speed would be advantageous to allow time for more complete combustion and higher effective expansion rates. Conversely, piston speed is slowest near the bottom of the stroke, with no useful effect. The Bourke two-stroke engine of the 1950's overcame these drawbacks with the use of a scotch yoke drive to the crankshaft, but could never solve vibration problems. Other methods have been proposed, but all involving additional complexity, weight, and manufacturing cost.
(h) The connecting rod-crankshaft system has high friction due to side thirst on the piston during most of the stroke. This causes friction, heat, and wear, reducing efficiency and the useful life of the lubricating oil and engine itself. Also, the piston skirt needed to carry this thrust adds to piston weight and engine height.
(i) Crankshaft engines have developed into high-speed machines, giving more power to weight with smaller sizes. This, though, requires more gearing to reduce these speeds to those usable in practice, especially in transportation. At the same time some speeds are set within narrow limits, such as lawn mower blade speeds, and that of generators to give the necessary output frequencies, etc. To use lighter, higher-speed engines a reduction drive would be necessary for such uses, at a cost not compatible with the small engine market. Thus, despite many advances in high-speed multi-cylinder engines, the technology of small engines is virtually stagnant due to speed as well as cost restrictions.
(j) Crankshaft four-stroke engines require a separate camshaft operating at half crankshaft speed to drive valve gear. This requires two precision cut gears or toothed pulleys and belts, and entails extra parts, bearings, weight, and attention to timing and alignment during assembly and repair.
(k) Crankshaft four-stroke engines depend on a lubrication system that requires a pressure pump and stable horizontal orientation. This limits or denies their use in inclined and inverted operation, as in chain saws and other power tools, and requires added systems and complexity to allow use in aerobatic airplanes.
(l) Crankshaft four-stroke engines require a volume of oil for adequate lubrication, cooling, and consumption, which adds to engine weight with no mechanical benefit, putting them at a weight disadvantage compared to two-stroke engines. Additionally, if water-cooled these engines require a separate and complex system including radiator, pump, external hoses, etc. with weight penalties, maintenance problems, and no mechanical advantage.
(m) Crankshaft engines are very unsymmetrical, especially the four-stroke types, leading to high costs in engineering and manufacture. Due to offset components such as the camshaft and its gearing, the oil pump, cylinder placement at ninety degrees to crankshaft axis, etc., the cross-sectional area is large, leading to high drag in aeronautical applications, and limiting use in circular spaces. Due to lack of axial symmetry, the majority of engine components must be intricate castings or forgings, and thus they do not lend themselves to rapid or easily automated manufacture from extrusions or flat stock components. This also makes the setup for manufacture, and model changes later, both slow and costly, restricting both the size and location of engine manufacturers to generally large ones in developed countries. At the same time repair parts tend to be specialized and costly. This has led to high repair costs, trade deficits, and lack of self-sufficiency in smaller and poorer countries.
(n) In crankshaft two-stroke cycle engines the combined volume of both crankcase and variable under-piston volume is used as a pump to ingest the intake mixture of air, fuel, and oil. The varying movement of the connecting rod would make sealing the area below the piston from the rest of the crankcase cavity very difficult. If this were practical it could be used to advantage for simple supercharging in both two and four-stoke engines, air compression, direct drive to reciprocating pumps, etc.
(o) In crankshaft two-stroke engines the use of the crankcase for intake pumping precludes the use of more reliable oil-lubricated power output bearings in a separate cavity.
(p) Crankshaft two-stoke engines generally suffer from the fact that intake transfer and exhaust ports are timed only by piston movement, allowing fuel m to exit through open exhaust ports, exhaust gases to be intermixed with incoming fuel mixture causing rough idle, etc. This causes high rates of fuel consumption and air pollution. A few attempts have been made at varying exhaust port timing, but with additional complexity and cost. The addition of bulky and expensive “tuned” expansion chamber exhaust systems has been used to partially offset this problem. However they are effective only during a small range at high rpm, increasing power but not reducing pollution at other speeds or rough idle. More stringent air pollution controls and higher fuel prices will increasingly limit the use of standard two-stroke engines.
With modern materials, computed aided design and manufacturing, and fuel use and air pollution concerns, viable alternatives to the crankshaft engine should be investigated. Many other types of engines have been proposed, some tested, and in a few rare cases put into production, such as the Wankel rotary and the cam track Dynacam™ engine. However even these have not been optimum, especially in the areas of exhaust emissions and economy of manufacture and have had generally limited success.
While clearly much different in operation, the small, light, and low-vibration Wankel could be used in virtually every application now using piston engines. It has disadvantages, though, including:
(q) Wankel rotary engine cost of manufacture is high. The necessary optimum clearances and large flat combustion chamber areas to seal require higher cost production processes and materials. Thus, in real terms it has not been able to compete successfully with standard piston engines.
(r) Wankel rotary engine air pollution is more of a problem due to varying combustion chamber temperatures and sealing problems. Techniques used to control emissions in standard crankshaft engines are often not directly applicable to the Wankel rotary engine. These appear to worsen more with age than with standard engines.
(s) Wankel rotary engine repair services and parts are more costly and are not widely available due to few mechanics and parts manufacturers being familiar with the very different technology used.
An alternate method to the connecting rod-crank shaft and rotary engine systems of power output is the use of a reciprocating piston driving a rotary output shaft through a sinusoidal cam track driven mechanism. U.S. Pat. No. 1,052,763 (Stone & Scott, 1913) is one of many early examples of cam track single-cylinder engines. The most successful modern example is the Dynacam™ Type Certified multi-cylinder aircraft engine, shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,492,188 (Palmer et al 1985). Past patents for this type of engine have described various arrangements whereby this motion transfer has been tried, and different component arrangements, but clearly they all have had disadvantages, including:
(t) Previous cam track engines have excessive vibration as single piston engines, caused by an imbalance of parts, even more than the connecting rod-crankshaft system with counterweights. Some patents show a second piston in line with the first for balance, examples being U.S. Pat. No. 1,613,136 (Schieffelin, 1927), U.S. Pat. No. 1,629,686 (Dreisbach 1927), U.S. Pat. No. 1,876,506 (Lee, 1932). These involve excessive added complexity, especially in the arrangement for power output, often necessitating multiple cam tracks, undesirable shaft through a combustion chamber, etc. Again in the interest of balanced operation, many patents show additional pistons added in array around the shaft, as in the Dynacam™, an early example being U.S. Pat. No. 1,065,604 (Gray, 1913). Like multi-cylinder conventional engines, these also are too complex and expensive for small power needs.
(u) Previous cam track engines have cooling complications. Some patents for single cylinder versions show a cam system within the piston itself; with no means of cooling the bearings as in U.S. Pat. No. 1,052,763 (Stone & Scott, 1913). As these would be exposed to heat from the piston, such a system would necessitate a large flow of oil for cooling and lubrication, necessitating a high capacity and power consuming oil pump, oil cooling radiator, etc., not economically practical for small engines, and never shown in the patent drawings. When multiple cylinders are used around a central shaft, space restrictions generally do not allow for air-cooling of the cylinders, and thus also require a liquid coolant pump, radiator, etc.
(v) In previous cam track engines, lubrication is either a major problem or requires a complex system. In configurations showing a spinning bearing assembly, lubricant would clearly be thrown from the bearings by centrifugal force and would need to be constantly replenished by a pump-supplied pure lubrication system. Reciprocating components may be difficult to supply or direct lubricant to, especially if using sleeve-type bearings needing internal oil pressure to operate. As mentioned, if adjacent to the hot piston or cylinder assembly, additional systems for cooling of the lubricant would also have to be provided.
(w) In previous cam track engines sizing of bearings is definitely problematic if these are within the diameter of the piston or cylinder, as shown in several patents. The high inertia and pressure loading on the piston assembly to be transferred to the output cam track require relatively large bearings, not possible in the space restrictions often shown.
(x) In previous patents of cam track engines, one or more single output rollers in a single cam track is usually shown. These are clearly subject to constant and undesirable abrupt rotation reversals, a major problem. Some show two output rollers at each location to avoid this, still with a single cam track, but need added length and complexity to achieve this, with no other advantage.
(y) In previous cam track engines, output is still generally by a small diameter shaft and a lower case equivalent to a crankcase is still needed, as well as the shaft machining and additional components mentioned above. With multi-cylinder systems complex castings and machinings are needed.
(z) In previous cam track engines, as with crankshaft engines, heavy inertia storage flywheels were often added to smooth out vibrations and allow smooth running at lower speeds. Alternately, the output shaft or sinusoidal cam may be made oversize and overweight for a similar effect, but as with a crankshaft its small radius is still not an efficient location for inertia storage.
Accordingly several objects and advantages of the present invention include:
(a) to provide a single-cylinder engine which is of low vibration, with 100% balanced reciprocating forces, minimal operator fatigue, low noise levels, long life span, minimal maintenance problems, and especially adaptable to direct or integral drive of loads.
(b) to provide an engine without the necessity of added flywheel inertia for low vibration or for option using the Diesel cycle;
(c) to provide an engine with a lightweight and rigid power output attachment, without need of separate parts or machining operations;
(d) to provide a vertical-shaft engine without horizontal transmission of vibration, operator discomfort, excessive maintenance problems, and leakage of lubricant.
(e) to provide an engine capable of smoothly producing large amounts of power in a single cylinder, thus replacing multi-cylinder engines in many uses.
(f) to provide an engine which does not require the complexity of adding cylinders to achieve smooth operation;
(g) to provide an engine with a balanced piston speed for optimum combustion;
(h) to provide an engine without piston side thrust;
(i) to provide an engine with inherent speed reduction for high piston speed and low weight, adaptable to modern advances in high speed engines;
(j) to provide a four-stroke engine that does not require a separate camshaft and its drive mechanisms;
(k) to provide an engine without a gravity feed oil pump and which can thus be operated in inclined and inverted positions;
(l) to provide an engine with an effective oil lubrication system that acts as a flywheel and thus minimizes weight in both four-stroke and two-stroke versions, also adaptable as a liquid cooling system with no water, radiator, or external hosing.
(m) to provide an engine with symmetrical components of minimal axial cross-section especially suited to use in aeronautical applications and use in tubular spaces, and of easily automated and economical manufacture from stock extruded and rolled materials;
(n) to provide an engine whose under-piston volume is usable for effective supercharging or other useful work;
(o) to provide a two-stroke engine with oil-lubricated output bearings sealed from the air/fuel intake system;
(p) to provide a two-stroke engine with smooth running, minimized fuel use, and reduced harmful emissions by simple timed closing of the exhaust port;
(q) to provide an engine of simple manufacture which can compete with standard crankshaft engines in cost;
(r) to provide an engine which uses standard cylinder, piston, and valve technology for even temperature, optimum sealing, and long life; and thus can easily and effectively use emissions control methods of standard crankshaft engines;
(s) to provide an engine which uses well-proven and available piston engine technology and components for low cost manufacture, parts supply, and repair services;
(t) to provide a single-cylinder cam track engine with simple 100% balancing of piston assembly reciprocating weight for minimum vibration;
(u) to provide a cam track engine which has simple and effective oil cooling of internal components, and does not require additional liquid cooling or cooling radiators;
(v) to provide a cam track engine which has a simple and effective pressure oil lubrication system, without an oil pump;
(w) to provide a cam track engine with ample space for high capacity power output bearings;
(x) to provide a cam track engine with double output rollers to avoid rotation reversals, on the same axis, allowing double cams for increased diameter and thus flywheel effect, without increasing length.
(y) to provide a cam track engine without separate and complex stationary output bearing covers and rotary output means;
(z) to provide a cam track engine which uses the rotating cam track and existing lubricating oil most effectively as flywheel energy storage.
Further objects and advantages are to provide an improved technology for engines which are simple, smooth-running, economical, of low pollution, easily manufactured including in developing countries, especially adaptable to use of supercharging and compound operation cycles, and which allow new opportunities for further advances applicable to many other related uses such as air and refrigerant compressors, pumps, fluid driven motors and the like, at a cost competitive with present machines. Still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the following drawings and description.
In accordance with the present invention, an external rotary drum (rotor) system replaces the connecting rod, crankcase, and crankshaft of a conventional piston engine. This converts the reciprocating motion of the piston or pistons to rotary motion of the rotor, and incorporates multiple improvements over the prior art. An integral lubrication and cooling system captures the dynamic pressure of lubricant spinning with the rotor, providing a source of pressurized lubricant and/or coolant, enhanced flywheel effect, and operational advantages. To eliminate vibration of single cylinder versions, a balancer of weight equal to the piston assembly reciprocates on the same axis as the piston assembly, in opposite directions.
In the drawings, closely related figures have the same number but different alphabetic suffixes.
One or more inspection plugs 57 allow inspection of bearings, changing of oil, etc. Indexing notches or pins (not shown) positively locate the drum 55 in position on the cam plates 52 and 53, with oil retained by rubber O-ring or similar means. On assembly the cam plates 52 and 53 form an open bearing groove of sinusoidal shape, as will be graphically descried in
On the inner cam plate 52 is located an intake cam 25A and an exhaust cam 25B which drive the intake and exhaust valves through a pushrod system, these being of standard prior art design, through prior art roller tappets (not shown). Valves may be adjusted automatically by hydraulic lifters operating from the pressure oil system, or manually if so designed. It will be noted that the pushrod tube (27 of
From
This embodiment can be used to supercharge the intake transferred to the combustion chamber above piston 32, for substantially increased power output or, as in aircraft, full rated power up to high altitudes. Also by this means in both two stroke and four stroke engines the rotor assembly and its bearings are permitted to operate in a permanent oil-lubricated environment with a very minimum of dilution or contamination from combustion gases blown by the piston rings.
Given the location of the rotating inner cam plate (52 of
At 45 degrees past bottom center, the gases above piton 32 are being compressed, while a fresh volume of gases is being admitted through the port 106, as timed by the rotary valve 108. At 135 degrees, ignition (or injection of compression ignition versions) has occurred and the piston 32 is traveling downward, producing power. A portion of the power produced is used directly by piston 32 and indirectly by piston 101 to compress the new volume of intake 2:1 and force it to the intercooler 110 and associated manifold for storage and cooling. The use of power at this time helps to smooth out the output torque fluctuations experienced by a conventional engine. At 225 degrees, the burnt gases above the piston 32 are being admitted into the inter-piston space where they undergo an additional 1:2 expansion for higher efficiency, expansive cooling, and additional power output. At 315 degrees the fresh intake at near 2:1 preliminary compression is being admitted into the combustion chamber, where they help to force the expanded exhaust gases out the secondary exhaust 104. It will be seen that power is transferred to the rotor on three of the four strokes: at 135 degrees by combustion above piston 32, at 225 degrees by expansion between pistons 32 and 101, and at 315 degrees by admission of the pressurized charge stored in the intercooler 110.
From this explanation of the generally prior art compound engine, it can be appreciated that a very advantageous arrangement is provided by the present invention for the simple and efficient functioning of a compound four-stroke engine. It should be noted that due to the near-total absence of side forces on the piston 32, and the fact that the piston can be easily cooled by any desired internal flow of cooling oil as provided in
Several other combination arrangements and embodiments not shown are possible. For example extension of both the piston rod 36—with attached piston 32—and the balancer 33—with attached piston 101—in both directions, giving a supercharged two-stroke or four stroke, or compound four-stroke, engine driving a compound compressor or double-acting pump at the end opposite the combustion chamber, without increasing the number of moving parts. Also, by varying the relative diameters between pistons 32 and 101 any desired compound ratios may be obtained.
The mechanism described can also be used as a single or double-ended simple or compound compressor or pump driven by an outside power source (electrical or by belts), with three moving parts plus bearings. When the secondary piston 101 is not desired, for simplicity a cylindrical cross pin of weight equal to the piston can replace the balancers shown, and operate with clearance in a slot in a single or two-ended piston assembly, of a stretched letter “O” shape. Clearly an electrical generator or motor rotor can be incorporated integral with the rotor for compact low-vibration generator or compressor units, integral engine driven or electric powered. Further, a combination of both a generator rotor and compressor pistons can be driven integral with the same engine (gasoline, Diesel, two stoke, four-stroke, compound or surged) for a universal field power system, with great economy of size, weight, cost and practicality.
It will be seen that for the same rotational speed of the bearings 65, the smaller diameter allowed by the embodiment of
In
Using a minimum of three pistons, the embodiment shown eliminates the need for a balancer (33 of
It can be seen that using multiple pistons as shown here and in the prior art, such as U.S. Pat. No. 2,983,264 (Herrmann 1961), air-cooling is problematic due to space limitations, and water-cooling is thus normally proposed. It would be advantageous to use the lubricating oil for cooling also and eliminate a water cooling system, but as the heat conduction properties of oil are about half that of water this becomes bulky, heavy, and impractical with the prior art. With the embodiment of
The camshaft may include an integral extension in the form of rotor shaft 51 to locate or drive external components, while large diameter components, as the generator/motor for a hybrid gasoline/electric automobile may be mounted directly and independently to the rotor assembly 50. For automobile use the engine can be easily canted at an angle if desired for lower height, with belt-driven accessories driven by an extension of the camshaft. Thus both the independent and combined features of the present invention greatly aid the practicality, simplicity, and viability of multiple-cylinder cam track engines.
From the description above, the many advantages of my optimized linear engine become evident, including:
(a) It is a simple engine achieving a built in reduction, cam drive, power output attachment, and pressure lubrication and cooling system with no additional parts.
(b) It is an efficient engine by reducing or eliminating friction losses and improving combustion conditions.
(c) It is a lightweight engine due to optimum location and use of components.
(d) It is a powerful engine due to built-in supercharging and inherent high speed.
(e) It is an easily manufactured engine due to simple generally cylindrical components.
(f) It is of low vibration due to full dynamic balancing of reciprocating parts.
(g) It has a low risk of exhaust emission or maintenance problems due to the use of proven cylinder and valve technologies.
Although the description and operation above contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope or applications of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the present preferred embodiments of this invention. Many other variations are possible. For example, other reduction ratios of piston to rotor movement may be easily obtained by varying the number of curves in the cam track, variations of the cam track curvature may allow enhanced combustion properties, and additional features may be added which enhance operation and were difficult or impossible with the prior art. Also some features of the prior art may retained in combination with the present invention, for example lubrication of the bearings with a gasoline/oil mixture as in prior art two-stroke cycle engines, whereby the spinning oil supply is eliminated yet the other advantages are retained. Thus the scope of the invention should be determined not only by the examples given, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of PPA Ser. No. 60/437,875, filed 2003 Jan. 3