This disclosure relates generally to the allocation of computing resources and, more particularly, to methods and systems for the optimization of available and allocated computing resources for a virtual machine.
The approaches described in this section could be pursued but are not necessarily approaches that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.
In current computing network environments, the utilization of virtual machines is widely deployed. A virtual machine (VM) is a software implementation of a machine (e.g. a computer) that executes computer programs similarly to a physical computer. Multiple virtual machines can be created within a single physical computer. Each virtual machine may run its own operating system and other software so that a single physical computer may include a plurality of virtual machines running independently of each other. Such a physical computer can be used as a host computer within a computer network and allow users to access its resident virtual machines from remote locations. A virtual machine environment can be used to isolate a certain computer program so it is executed within a secure manner through the usage of the virtual environment.
Virtual machines embedded within the host computer can logically share its computing resources, such as processors, storage, auxiliary memory, Random Access Memory (RAM), and other physical appliances that are included in the physical computer, to create their own virtual computing resources. In other words, each virtual machine may use a part of the shared computing resources to execute its own specific tasks such as running the operating system and other applications.
Thus, a virtual environment requires resource allocation before the users may utilize the virtual machines. The resources can be allocated evenly or depending on the typical tasks performed by a specific virtual machine. Users can adjust the allocation of resources to increase or decrease resources for each virtual machine.
Accordingly, each time a virtual machine is booted, it can be provided with new amounts of computing resources. In such a changing environment, the allocated computing resources are not optimized and the overall virtual machine performance deteriorates. Hence, the virtual machines may require optimization of the allocated computing resources each time they are changed.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In accordance with various embodiments and the corresponding disclosure thereof, a method for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine is disclosed. The method may comprise determining the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine and determining optimal data structures for the virtual machine based on the determination. The optimal data structures may include an indexing data, historic data, and other data structures. The method may further comprise allocating a RAM and disk storage to the optimal data structures and configuring the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage.
According to various exemplary embodiments, the computing resources may include the RAM, a Central Processing Unit (CPU), the disk storage, and a VM container. The optimal data structure sizes can be based on specific historical data. The optimal data structures can be based on the relative sizes of the indexing data structure and the historic data. The indexing data structures may include at least one hash table, while the historic data may comprise a flow history pages table. The determining of optimal data structures may comprise determining optimal sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables and the flow history pages table. The optimal sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables can be determined through an iterative process. Determining the sizes of the computing resources may comprise requesting a virtual machine manager to provide information related to allocated resources and/or acquiring usage metrics for computing resources.
Also disclosed is a system for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine. The system may comprise: a size determination module configured to determine the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine, an optimal data structure determination module configured to determine optimal data structures for the virtual machine, an allocation module configured to allocate RAM and a disk storage to the optimal data structures, and a configuration module to configure the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage. The system may further and optionally comprise a communication module configured to communicate, to a further virtual machine, information related to the optimal data structures for the virtual machine.
Also disclosed is a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, which when executed by one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to implement the method for optimization of resources within a virtual machine.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or more aspects comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative features of the one or more aspects. These features are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of various aspects may be employed, and this description is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
The following detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show illustrations, in accordance with exemplary embodiments. These exemplary embodiments, which are also referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. The embodiments can be combined, other embodiments can be utilized, or structural, logical and electrical changes can be made without departing from the scope of what is claimed. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
According to various embodiments disclosed herein, methods for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine are disclosed. The methods may provide an intelligent and effective way of optimizing available and previously allocated computing resources for each virtual machine within a virtual machine container. The computing resources can be optimized so that the size of the data structures associated with a RAM and disk storage can provide effective usage of these resources and increase overall performance.
A virtual machine is a software implementation of a machine that may execute software programs like a physical machine. An important characteristic of a virtual machine is that the software running inside is limited to the resources and abstractions allocated to the virtual machine by its host computer.
A hypervisor may refer to a hardware virtualization technique that runs inside the host computer and manages the execution of virtual machine within the host computer. A virtual machine manager is a virtual-machine manager application which may be utilized to configure the virtual machine. In contrast to the hypervisor which runs inside the host computer, the virtual machine manager may run inside or outside the host computer.
When a virtual machine is booted, the sizes of the computing resources available to the virtual machine may be determined through a request to the virtual machine manager or to the hypervisor to provide information related to the allocated resources.
In some examples, the sizes of computing resources can be determined by analyzing metrics data obtained from the virtual machine manager or by request to the operating system of the host computer.
The term “computing resources,” as used herein, may refer to one or more of the following: a RAM, a CPU, disk storage, and a Virtual Machine container. The virtual machine container may be associated with the physical resources of a host computer. Accordingly, the size of the virtual machine container may be determined by the amount of physical resources, such as a CPU, a memory, storage, a network bandwidth, and/or an input/output (I/O) bandwidth available to the virtual machine container.
Once the sizes of the allocated computing resources are determined, the optimal data structures for the virtual machine are determined based on the sizes of the allocated computing resources. Generally, the data structures may include an indexing data structure and historic data, which are correlated. In one example, the indexing data structure includes at least one hash table that maps calculated hash functions related to various data fragments to their indexes (e.g., memory addresses where such data is stored). As is described below in more detail, several hash tables may be provided, such as a coarse hash table and a fine hash table. The historic data is a typical data structure that maps the data fragments to their identifying keys (e.g., addresses).
One particular example of the historic data is a flow history pages table. Accordingly, the determination of optimal data structures for the virtual machine may include defining optimal sizes of the indexing data structure and the historic data. Such sizes can be calculated in many ways, and may generally be iterative and statistical. In some examples, the optimal sizes of these data structures (e.g., tables) may be based on an analysis of certain historical data including, for example, previously calculated sizes of these data structures related to certain sizes of allocated resources of the same or a different virtual machine. The optimization of data structure table sizes may include finding a balance between the requirements of the indexing data structure and the historic data.
Once the optimal data structures are determined for the virtual machine, the RAM and/or the disk storage can be allocated to the optimal data structures. Thus, given certain sizes of the available resources, data structures are allocated resources to provide efficient and fast data retrieval, transfer, and storage. As a result, the overall operation efficiency of the virtual machine may be increased. In addition, the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage may be periodically reconfigured to meet the changing conditions of the available computing resources.
The following provides a detailed description of various exemplary embodiments related to methods and systems for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine.
Referring now to the drawings,
The processor 110 may refer to a computer appliance that carries out computer program instructions to perform basic arithmetical, logical, and I/O operations. The processor 110 may be implemented as a CPU, a controller, a microcontroller, and so forth.
The memory 120 may refer to disk storage (e.g., a hard disk drive), a RAM, a Read Only Memory (ROM), and other types of volatile or nonvolatile data storages.
A communication interface 130 can be used to connect the host computer 100 to various I/O peripheral devices that may be provided, including a keyboard, a mouse, a display, a communication port, a modem, and so forth.
In the example shown, the memory 120 may store, among other things, software operating system 140, software implementing virtual machines 150, and software applications 160. The operating system 140 may be configured to execute a number of software modules and applications and generate one or more virtual machines (e.g., Virtual Machine 1, Virtual Machine 2, . . . Virtual Machine N). Generally, the virtual machines 150 can be generated using any of the technologies presently known to those skilled in the art. At each time instance, one or more virtual machines 150 can be executed by the host computer 100.
Even though the host computers 100 and the VMs 150 are shown as being in line with the computing appliances 310, this may not necessarily be the fact. For example, the data packets can be redirected to the host computers 100 and VMs 150 located elsewhere. In any case, either physically or virtually, these data packets are flowing through the VMs 150.
The network 330 is a network of data processing nodes interconnected for the purpose of data communication, which may be utilized to communicatively couple various components of the environment 300. The network 330 may include the Internet or any other network capable of communicating data between devices. Suitable networks may include or interface with any one or more of, for instance, a local intranet, a PAN (Personal Area Network), a LAN (Local Area Network), a WAN (Wide Area Network), a MAN (Metropolitan Area Network), a VPN (virtual private network), a SAN (storage area network), a frame relay connection, an AIN (Advanced Intelligent Network connection), a SONET (synchronous optical network connection), a digital T1, T3, E1 or E3 line, DDS (Digital Data Service) connection, DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) connection, an Ethernet connection, an ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) line, a dial-up port, such as a V.90, V.34 or V.34bis analog modem connection, a cable modem, an ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) connection, or an FDDI (Fiber Distributed Data Interface) or CDDI (Copper Distributed Data Interface) connection. Furthermore, communications may also include links to any of a variety of wireless networks, including WAP (Wireless Application Protocol), GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) or TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access), cellular phone networks, GPS (Global Positioning System), CDPD (cellular digital packet data), RIM (Research in Motion, Limited) duplex paging network, Bluetooth radio, or an IEEE 802.11-based radio frequency network. The network 330 may further include or interface with any one or more of an RS-232 serial connection, an IEEE-1394 (Firewire) connection, a Fiber Channel connection, an IrDA (infrared) port, a SCSI (Small Computer Systems Interface) connection, a USB (Universal Serial Bus) connection or other wired or wireless, digital or analog interface or connection, mesh or Digi® networking.
Each computing appliance 310 may refer to a server, a storage system, computer, a laptop, a tablet computer, a portable computing device, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a handheld cellular phone, a mobile phone, a smart phone, a handheld device having wire or wireless connection capability, or any other electronic device suitable for communicating data via the network 330.
The computing appliance 310 may be configured to interact with the host computer 100 and transfer data over the network 330. The VMM 320 can be located within or without the host computer 100 and configured to run the virtual machine 150. The virtual machines 150 may provide a complete system platform, which may emulate the execution of an operating system and one or more software applications.
The virtual machine manager 320 or the hypervisor (not shown but described above) can be implemented as hardware, software or a combination thereof to generate, manage and allow multiple virtual machines 150 to run concurrently on the host computer 100. The virtual machine manager 320 can be implemented as a separate appliance as shown in the figure; however, in certain embodiments, it can be integrated within the host computer 100. When implemented separately, the virtual machine manager 320 can be interrelated with the host computer 100 directly or via the network 330.
If it is determined that the current allocation of RAM 450 to the indexing data structure 410 and historic data 420 is suboptimal, the amount of the RAM 450 and the disk 460 available to these data structures can be reallocated by the software running on the VM 150 inside the host computer 100. For example, the amount of the RAM 450 available to the indexing data structure 410 may be increased so that there is more space to point to the information on the disk 460. As already mentioned above, the historic data 420 may be composed by saving data from data packets that are traversed between the computing appliances 310 shown in
The amount of the historic data 420 that traverses the VM 150 may be quiet large. Accordingly, only a subset of the historic data 420 may be stored in the RAM 450. This subset of the historic data is lost when the host computer 100 is turned off. The amount of the historic data 420 currently stored in the RAM 450 may not be optimal for the size of the RAM 450 available to the VM 150 and the current partitioning of the RAM 450 between the indexing data structure 410 and the historic data 420. In response, the VMM 320 may decide to move some of the historic data 420 from the RAM 450 to the disk 460. As some historic data 420 is moved to the disk 460 to free the RAM 450, the VMM 320 may increase the amount of the RAM 450 available to the indexing data structure 410 to better allocate resources between a subset of the historic data 420 and the indexing data structure 410.
In the example shown, the data structure configuration 500 may comprise an indexing data structure 510 and a historic data 520. In some exemplary embodiments, the indexing data structure 510 can be utilized in the RAM 450, while the historic data 520 can be utilized in the disk storage 460.
The historic data 520 may keep (where possible) storing the data packets sequentially as they flow between the computing appliances into a continuous sequence of data in order to optimize use of the disk. Indices 512 and 514 may represent hash entry points into that the sequence of the historic data 520. Preferably, the historic data 520 is not divided into data elements and, therefore, there may be no one-to-one correspondence between indices of the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520. For example, the index 512 may point to a byte 522 and index 514 may point to a byte 528. Bytes 524 and 526 may have no indices pointed to them at all. Additionally, the indices 512 and 514 may be associated with hash values that are internal or external (depending on how big the hash table is) to the indexing data structure 510. In some embodiments, the historic data 520 may be delineated by a rolling hash function or Rabin fingerprinting scheme. For example, the rolling hash function may provide a rolling hash for every byte of the historic data 520 and matching a certain predetermined criteria.
The fine SHT 605 may include one or more entries comprising, for example, a check field 610 and a page field 615. The coarse SHT 625 may include one or more entries comprising a check field 620 and a page field 630. The FHPs 645 may include one or more pages (e.g., pages 1 to M). Each page (e.g., page N) may include page state information 650 and store data 655.
The virtual machine manager 320 may calculate hashes (i.e., a value returned by a hash function) at every received data element (i.e., a byte). In some embodiments, the data elements can be transferred over the network 330, and thus data elements may include Internet Protocol (IP) data packets or the like. The hashes in this case may be influenced by preceding bytes in the data flow. For example, the hashes can be influenced by n previous bytes. In this case, some examples of calculating the hashes may include cyclical redundancy checks (CRCs) and checksums over the previous n bytes of the data flow. In some embodiments, rolling implementations of CRCs and checksums can be used where a new byte is added, and a byte from n bytes earlier is removed.
Each calculated hash can be filtered by a fine filter 660 and a coarse filter 665. The VMM 320 may designate the locations in the data flow that meet the fine and coarse filter criteria as fine and coarse sync-points, respectively. The fine filter 660 and the coarse filter 665 may have different filter criteria. Typically, the filter criteria for the coarse filter 665 is more restrictive and may be used to further filter those hashes which pass the fine filter 660. In other words, the fine filter 660 may produce a fine comb of sync-points, and the coarse filter may produce a coarse comb of sync-points. One example of the filter criteria is the null filter, which allows results in sync-points at all locations. In another example, the filter criteria declares a fine sync-point when the top five bits of the hashes are all zeros, and a coarse filter criteria that stores or compares hashes when the top ten bits of the hashes are all zeros. The hashes at the fine sync-points index the fine SHT 605, and the hashes at the coarse sync-points index the coarse SHT 625. For example, the index could be derived from the hash by using a number of low order bits from the hash. The filter criteria affect the sizing of the SHTs 605 and 625 and the probability of matching a hash in the SHTs 605 and 625. The more sync-points that are generated, the easier it is to identify repeated data but the larger the tables (i.e., the SHTs 605 and 625) need to be in order to index a given amount of information for the data flow. Having a coarse and fine table helps optimize this tradeoff. Alternative implementations may use a single table or multiple tables.
The fine SHT 605 can be populated with hashes as the data is stored and when the data is recalled from disk storage 220 or other locally accessible storage. The fine SHT 605 finely indexes the received data. In some embodiments, the fine SHT 605 may hold approximately one entry for every 100 bytes of the received data. The coarse SHT 625 can be populated as the data is stored and is coarsely indexed. For example, the coarse SHT 625 may hold one entry for approximately every 4 kilobytes (KB) of the data. The fine SHT 605 and the coarse SHT 625 may be also considered short term and long term memory index structures, respectively.
In this example, VM 150 may include a fine SHT 605, a coarse filter 665, and a FHP 645 data structure, and the computing appliance 310 may also include a fine SHT 605, a coarse filter 665, and a FHP 645 data structure. Each appliance in the computer network environments 300 or 400 may maintain the separate data structures, with may include separate filter criteria for the fine filters 660 and the coarse filters 665. The page state information 650, in the FHP 645 of each appliance in the computer network environments 300 or 400, includes page parameters, page ownership permissions, peer state, and a list of valid byte ranges for each appliance in the computer network environments 300 or 400. Those skilled in the art would appreciate that the data structure 510 and historic data 520 can be differently established and managed, depending on specific application.
In other embodiments, the system 700 for optimization of resources within the virtual machine may include additional, fewer, or different modules for various applications. Furthermore, all modules can be integrated within a single apparatus, or, alternatively, can be remotely located and optionally be accessed via a third party.
The size determination module 710 may be configured to determine the sizes of computing resources available to a virtual machine 150. This determination can be performed by requesting the virtual machine manager 320 or, in some examples, the host computer 100, to provide the sizes of allocated resources. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the size determination module 710 may measure or in some other way acquire computing resources usage metrics in order to determine the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine. Typical computing resources metrics may include the number of used processors, allocated memory resources including RAM and disk storage, memory hierarchy, memory organization, communication latency, bandwidth, and so forth.
The optimal data structure determination module 720 can be configured to determine optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150. In some examples, the optimal data structures may include the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520 as described above with reference to
In general, the determination of optimal data structures is a tradeoff of the sizes related to the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520. For example, if the virtual machine 150 is provided with additional space in the disk storage 220, a new balance should be determined to optimize used data structures. In this case, when the historic data 520 associated with the disk storage 220 is increased, the stored data should be properly indexed, and thus the indexing data structure 510 associated with the RAM 210 is in need for optimization to be enabled to effectively index all data stored in the extended disk storage 220. Alternatively, for example, when the indexing data structure 510 is provided with a large size, but the historic data 520 is relatively small, the exceeded size of the indexing data structure 510 will be useless, while some data cannot even get data reduction. Thus, the optimization process of optimal data structures is the way of adapting sizes of data structures (e.g., table sizes) as used in the virtual machine 150 responsive to the size of available computing resources that were already allocated to the virtual machine 150.
The allocation module 730 can be configured to allocate the computing resources (such as the RAM 210 and the disk storage 220 to the optimal data structures, as determined by the optimal data structure determination module 720).
The configuration module 740 can be used to configure the optimal data structures within the RAM 210 and the disk storage 220. The configuring can be performed in real time to tie the virtual machine 150 to a changing computing resources environment. Thus, the optimization of allocated resources can be performed dynamically.
The communication module 750 can be configured to communicate, to a further virtual machine 150 or a virtual machine manager 320, information related to the optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150. The communication of such information can be performed based on requests received or on an ongoing basis (for example, each time the computing resources for certain virtual machine 150 are optimized).
The method 800 can be performed by various modules discussed above with reference to
As shown in
At operation 820, the optimal data structure determination module 720 determines optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150. As described above, the optimal data structure is based on the determined sizes of the available computing resources. The determination of optimal data structures may include the calculation of an optimal size balance between the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520. The optimal sizes may be determined based on an iteration calculation process, a statistical method, or prior historical data of the considered virtual machine 150 or any other virtual machine in the container. Even though allocating the available computing resources between the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520 is important, it will be appreciated that the systems and methods described herein are not limited to such data structures and can involve allocating resources among other resources within the RAM and/or storage.
At operation 830, the allocation module 730 allocates the computing resources, such as the RAM 2101-N and the disk storage 2201-N, to the data structures as determined at operation 820. At operation 840, the configuration module 740 configures the optimal data structures within the RAM 2101-N and the disk storage 2201-N.
At optional operation 850, the communication module 750 may communicate, to a further virtual machine 150 or a virtual machine manager 320, information related to the optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150.
The exemplary computer system 900 includes a processor or multiple processors 902 (e.g., a CPU), and a main memory 904, which communicate with each other via a bus 906. The computer system 900 can further include storage 908 and a network interface device 910.
The storage 908 may include a one or more computer-readable media 912, which stores one or more sets of instructions and data structures (e.g., instructions 914) embodying or utilized by any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 914 can also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 904 and/or within the processors 902 during execution thereof by the computer system 900. The main memory 904 and the processors 902 also constitute machine-readable media. The instructions 914 can further be transmitted or received over the network 330 via the network interface device 910 utilizing any one of a number of well-known transfer protocols (e.g., Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), CAN, Serial, and Modbus).
While the computer-readable medium 912 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “computer-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that causes the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present application, or that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying data structures utilized by or associated with such a set of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media. Such media can also include, without limitation, hard disks, floppy disks, flash memory cards, digital video disks, RAMs, ROMs, and the like.
The exemplary embodiments described herein can be implemented in an operating environment comprising computer-executable instructions (e.g., software) installed on a computer, in hardware, or in a combination of software and hardware. The computer-executable instructions can be written in a computer programming language or can be embodied in firmware logic. If written in a programming language conforming to a recognized standard, such instructions can be executed on a variety of hardware platforms and for interfaces to a variety of operating systems. Although not limited thereto, computer software programs for implementing the present method can be written in any number of suitable programming languages such as, for example, Java, C, C++, Perl, Visual Basic, or other compilers, assemblers, interpreters or other computer languages or platforms.
Thus, a computer-implemented method and systems for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine are described. These methods and systems may effectively be used to optimize balances between the sizes of used data structures responsive to the changed sizes of computing resources allocated to a virtual machine. Thus, the overall performance of the virtual machine is increased.
Although embodiments have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes can be made to these exemplary embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present application. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4494108 | Langdon, Jr. et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4558302 | Welch | Dec 1985 | A |
4612532 | Bacon et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
5023611 | Chamzas et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5243341 | Seroussi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5307413 | Denzer | Apr 1994 | A |
5357250 | Healey et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359720 | Tamura et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5373290 | Lempel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5483556 | Pillan et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5532693 | Winters et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5592613 | Miyazawa et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5627533 | Clark | May 1997 | A |
5635932 | Shinagawa et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652581 | Furlan et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659737 | Matsuda | Aug 1997 | A |
5675587 | Okuyama et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5710562 | Gormish et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5748122 | Shinagawa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754774 | Bittinger et al. | May 1998 | A |
5802106 | Packer | Sep 1998 | A |
5805822 | Long et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5883891 | Williams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903230 | Masenas | May 1999 | A |
5955976 | Heath | Sep 1999 | A |
6000053 | Levine et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003087 | Housel, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6054943 | Lawrence | Apr 2000 | A |
6081883 | Popelka et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084855 | Soirinsuo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6175944 | Urbanke et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191710 | Waletzki | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6295541 | Bodnar et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308148 | Bruins et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311260 | Stone et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339616 | Kovalev | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374266 | Shnelvar | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6434641 | Haupt et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434662 | Greene et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438664 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6489902 | Heath | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493698 | Beylin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6570511 | Cooper | May 2003 | B1 |
6587985 | Fukushima et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614368 | Cooper | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618397 | Huang | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633953 | Stark | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643259 | Borella et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650644 | Colley et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653954 | Rijavec | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6667700 | McCanne et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674769 | Viswanath | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6718361 | Basani et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728840 | Shatil et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738379 | Balazinski et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6769048 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6791945 | Levenson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6856651 | Singh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859842 | Nakamichi et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862602 | Guha | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6910106 | Sechrest et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6963980 | Mattsson | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968374 | Lemieux et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978384 | Milliken | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7007044 | Rafert et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7020750 | Thiyagaranjan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035214 | Seddigh et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7047281 | Kausik | May 2006 | B1 |
7069268 | Burns et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069342 | Biederman | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7110407 | Khanna | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111005 | Wessman | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113962 | Kee et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120666 | McCanne et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145889 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7197597 | Scheid et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200847 | Straube et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215667 | Davis | May 2007 | B1 |
7242681 | Van Bokkelen et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7243094 | Tabellion et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7266645 | Garg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278016 | Detrick et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7318100 | Demmer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7366829 | Luttrell et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7380006 | Srinivas et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383329 | Erickson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7383348 | Seki et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388844 | Brown et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7389357 | Duffie, III et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389393 | Karr et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7417570 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417991 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7420992 | Fang et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7428573 | McCanne et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7451237 | Takekawa et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453379 | Plamondon | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454443 | Ram et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457315 | Smith | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7460473 | Kodama et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7471629 | Melpignano | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7532134 | Samuels et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555484 | Kulkarni et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571343 | Xiang et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7571344 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587401 | Yeo et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596802 | Border et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7619545 | Samuels et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620870 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624446 | Wilhelm | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630295 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639700 | Nabhan et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7643426 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7644230 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7676554 | Malmskog et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7698431 | Hughes | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7702843 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7714747 | Fallon | May 2010 | B2 |
7746781 | Xiang | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7764606 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7810155 | Ravi | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7827237 | Plamondon | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849134 | McCanne et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853699 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7873786 | Singh et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7941606 | Pullela et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7945736 | Hughes et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948921 | Hughes et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7953869 | Demmer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7970898 | Clubb et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8069225 | McCanne et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072985 | Golan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090027 | Schneider | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095774 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8140757 | Singh et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8171238 | Hughes et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8209334 | Doerner | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8225072 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8271325 | Silverman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8307115 | Hughes | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8312226 | Hughes | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8352608 | Keagy et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8370583 | Hughes | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386797 | Danilak | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8392684 | Hughes | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442052 | Hughes | May 2013 | B1 |
8447740 | Huang et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8473714 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489562 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8516158 | Wu et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8565118 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595314 | Hughes | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8613071 | Day et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8681614 | McCanne et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8700771 | Ramankutty et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8706947 | Vincent | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8725988 | Hughes et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732423 | Hughes | May 2014 | B1 |
8738865 | Hughes et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8743683 | Hughes | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8755381 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8811431 | Hughes | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8885632 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8929380 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8929402 | Hughes | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8930650 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9003541 | Patidar | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9036662 | Hughes | May 2015 | B1 |
9054876 | Yagnik | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9092342 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9130991 | Hughes | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9143455 | Hughes | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9152574 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9191342 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9253277 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9306818 | Aumann et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9363309 | Hughes | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9397951 | Hughes | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9438538 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20010026231 | Satoh | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010054084 | Kosmynin | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007413 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010702 | Ajtai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020040475 | Yap et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061027 | Abiru et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065998 | Buckland | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071436 | Border et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078242 | Viswanath | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101822 | Ayyagari et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107988 | Jordan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116424 | Radermacher et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129158 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129260 | Benfield et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131434 | Vukovic et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150041 | Reinshmidt et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163911 | Wee et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169818 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181494 | Rhee | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188871 | Noehring et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194324 | Guha | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002664 | Anand | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009558 | Ben-Yehezkel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012400 | McAuliffe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046572 | Newman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030123481 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123671 | He et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131079 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133568 | Stein et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142658 | Ofuji et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149661 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149869 | Gleichauf | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204619 | Bays | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030214502 | Park et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214954 | Oldak et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233431 | Reddy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008711 | Lahti et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040047308 | Kavanagh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083299 | Dietz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086114 | Rarick | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088376 | McCanne et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114569 | Naden et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117571 | Chang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123139 | Aiello et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040158644 | Albuquerque et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179542 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181679 | Dettinger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199771 | Morten et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202110 | Kim | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203820 | Billhartz | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205332 | Bouchard et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243571 | Judd | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250027 | Heflinger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255048 | Lev Ran et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010653 | McCanne | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044270 | Grove et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053094 | Cain et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055372 | Springer, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055399 | Savchuk | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071453 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091234 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111460 | Sahita | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131939 | Douglis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132252 | Fifer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141425 | Foulds | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171937 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177603 | Shavit | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190694 | Ben-Nun et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207443 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210151 | Abdo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220019 | Melpignano | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235119 | Sechrest et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240380 | Jones | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243743 | Kimura | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050243835 | Sharma et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256972 | Cochran et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278459 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283355 | Itani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286526 | Sood et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013210 | Bordogna et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026425 | Douceur et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031936 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036901 | Yang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039354 | Rao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045096 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059171 | Borthakur et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059173 | Hirsch et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060117385 | Mester et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136913 | Sameske | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143497 | Zohar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060195547 | Sundarrajan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195840 | Sundarrajan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212426 | Shakara et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218390 | Loughran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227717 | van den Berg et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250965 | Irwin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268932 | Singh et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280205 | Cho | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002804 | Xiong et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008884 | Tang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011424 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038815 | Hughes | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038816 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038858 | Hughes | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050475 | Hughes | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076693 | Krishnaswamy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070081513 | Torsner | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097874 | Hughes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110046 | Farrell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115812 | Hughes | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127372 | Khan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130114 | Li et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140129 | Bauer et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150497 | De La Cruz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174428 | Lev Ran et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179900 | Daase et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195702 | Yuen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195789 | Yao | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198523 | Hayim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226320 | Hager et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237104 | Alon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244987 | Pedersen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245079 | Bhattacharjee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248084 | Whitehead | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258468 | Bennett | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263554 | Finn | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276983 | Zohar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280245 | Rosberg | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005156 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013532 | Garner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016301 | Chen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028467 | Kommareddy et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031149 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080031240 | Hughes | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071818 | Apanowicz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080095060 | Yao | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080133536 | Bjorner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133561 | Dubnicki et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080184081 | Hama et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205445 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222044 | Gottlieb et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229137 | Samuels et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243992 | Jardetzky et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267217 | Colville et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300887 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313318 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320151 | McCanne et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006801 | Shultz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024763 | Stepin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037448 | Thomas | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060198 | Little | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063696 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080460 | Kronewitter, III et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089048 | Pouzin | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092137 | Haigh et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100483 | McDowell | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090158417 | Khanna et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175172 | Prytz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204961 | DeHaan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234966 | Samuels et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245114 | Vijayaraghavan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265707 | Goodman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274294 | Itani | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279550 | Romrell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281984 | Black | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100005222 | Brant et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011125 | Yang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020693 | Thakur | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100054142 | Moiso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070605 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077251 | Liu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082545 | Bhattacharjee et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085964 | Weir et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115137 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121957 | Roy et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124239 | Hughes | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131957 | Kami | May 2010 | A1 |
20100169467 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177663 | Johansson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225658 | Coleman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232443 | Pandey | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246584 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290364 | Black | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318892 | Teevan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110002346 | Wu | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022812 | van der Linden et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110113472 | Fung et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110154169 | Gopal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154329 | Arcese et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110181448 | Koratagere | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110219181 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225322 | Demidov et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261828 | Smith | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276963 | Wu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299537 | Saraiya et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036325 | Mashtizadeh et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120069131 | Abelow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120173759 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120218130 | Boettcher et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221611 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230345 | Ovsiannikov | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239872 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130018722 | Libby | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018765 | Fork et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031642 | Dwivedi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044751 | Casado et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058354 | Casado et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080619 | Assuncao et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086236 | Baucke et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094501 | Hughes | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103655 | Fanghaenel et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130121209 | Padmanabhan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141259 | Hazarika et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163594 | Sharma et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130250951 | Koganti | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263125 | Shamsee et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282970 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130343191 | Kim et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140052864 | Van Der Linden et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140075554 | Cooley | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140101426 | Senthurpandi | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108360 | Kunath et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114742 | Lamontagne et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140123213 | Vank et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140181381 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140269705 | DeCusatis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279078 | Nukala et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140379937 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150074291 | Hughes | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074361 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078397 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150120663 | Le Scouarnec et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150170221 | Shah | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150281099 | Banavalikar | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281391 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150334210 | Hughes | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160014051 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160034305 | Shear et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160218947 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160255542 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1507353 | Feb 2005 | EP |
H05-061964 | Mar 1993 | JP |
WO0135226 | May 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“IPsec Anti-Replay Window: Expanding and Disabling,” Cisco IOS Security Configuration Guide. 2005-2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. Last updated: Sep. 12, 2006, 14pages (Previously cited as: Zhao et al., “Analysis and Improvement on IPSEC Anti-Replay Window Protocol”; 2003; IEEE pp. 553-558). |
Singh et al.; “Future of Internet Security—IPSEC”; pp. 1-8. |
Muthitacharoen, Athicha et al., “A Low-bandwidth Network File System,” 2001, in Proc. of the 18th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Banff, Canada, pp. 174-187. |
“Shared LAN Cache Datasheet”, 1996, http://www.lancache.com/slcdata.htm. |
Spring et al., “A protocol-independent technique for eliminating redundant network traffic”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 30, Issue 4 (Oct. 2000) pp. 87-95, Year of Publication: 2000. |
Hong, B et al. “Duplicate data elimination in a SAN file system”, In Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Mass Storage Systems (MSS '04), Goddard, MD, Apr. 2004. IEEE. |
You, L. L. and Karamanolis, C. 2004. “Evaluation of efficient archival storage techniques”, In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST). |
Douglis, F. et al., “Application specific Delta-encoding via Resemblance Detection”, Published in the 2003 USENIX Annual Technical Conference. |
You, L. L. et al., “Deep Store an Archival Storage System Architecture” Data Engineering, 2005. ICDE 2005. Proceedings of the 21st. Intl. Conf. on Data Eng., Tokyo, Japan, Apr. 5-8, 2005. pp. 12. |
Manber, Udi, “Finding Similar Files in a Large File System”, TR 93-33 Oct. 1994, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona. http://webglimpse.net/pubs/TR93-33.pdf. Also appears in the 1994 winter USENIX Technical Conference. |
Knutsson, Bjorn et al., “Transparent Proxy Signalling”, Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 3, No. 2, Jun. 2001. |
Definition memory (n), Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged (1993), available at <http://lionreference.chadwyck.com> (Dictionaries/Webster's Dictionary). |
Definition appliance, 2c, Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged (1993), available at <http://lionreference.chadwyck.com> (Dictionaries/Webster's Dictionary). |
Newton, “Newton's Telecom Dictionary”, 17th Ed., 2001, pp. 38, 201, and 714. |
Silver Peak Systems, “The Benefits of Byte-level WAN Deduplication” (2008). |
Final Written Decision, Dec. 30, 2014, Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2013-00403. |
Final Written Decision, Dec. 30, 2014, Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2013-00402. |
“Business Wire, ““Silver Peak Systems Delivers Family of Appliances for Enterprise-Wide Centralization of Branch Office Infrastructure; Innovative Local Instance Networking Approach Overcomes Traditional Application Acceleration Pitfalls”” (available at http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20050919005450/en/Silver-Peak-Systems-Delivers-Family-Appliances-Enterprise-Wide#.UVzkPk7u-1 (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)).” |
Riverbed, “Riverbed Introduces Market-Leading WDS Solutions for Disaster Recovery and Business Application Acceleration” (available at http://www.riverbed.com/about/news-articles/pressreleases/riverbed-introduces-market-leading-wds-solutions-fordisaster-recovery-and-business-application-acceleration.html (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)). |
Tseng, Josh, “When accelerating secure traffic is not secure” (available at http://www.riverbed.com/blogs/whenaccelerati.html?&isSearch=true&pageSize=3&page=2 (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)). |
Riverbed, “The Riverbed Optimization System (RiOS) v4.0: A Technical Overview” (explaining “Data Security” through segmentation) (available at http://mediacms.riverbed.com/documents/TechOverview-Riverbed-RiOS—4—0.pdf (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)). |
Riverbed, “Riverbed Awarded Patent on Core WDS Technology” (available at: http://www.riverbed.com/about/news-articles/pressreleases/riverbed-awarded-patent-on-core-wds-technology.html (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)). |
Final Written Decision, Jun. 9, 2015, Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-00245. |
Allowance, May 10, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Final, Mar. 25, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Request for Trial Granted, Jun. 11, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006. |
Allowance, Apr. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008. |
Final, Apr. 1, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Advisory, Jun. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Non-Final, Jul. 30, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Non-Final, Sep. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,548, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
Non-Final, Jun. 6, 2014 U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,940, filed Feb. 26, 2014. |
Allowance, Sep. 5, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,229, filed Apr. 8, 2014. |
Non-Final, Jul. 11, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,188, filed Apr. 8, 2014. |
Advisory Action, Mar. 25, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance, May 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance, Sep. 12, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/657,733, filed Oct. 22, 2012. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability, Oct. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13,657,733, filed Oct. 22, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, Oct. 1, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,940, filed Feb. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Mar. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,940, filed Feb. 26, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jun. 8, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,167, filed Apr. 8, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Oct. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,101, filed May 5, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Jun. 3, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/548,195, filed Nov. 19, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Mar. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/549,425, filed Nov. 20, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Jul. 27, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/549,425, filed Nov. 20, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, May 6, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, May 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015. |
Final Office Action, Jul. 14, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321, filed May 29, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jul. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,949, filed Jun. 9, 2015. |
Final Office Action, Dec. 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015. |
Advisory Action, Nov. 25, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321, filed May 29, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, Dec. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,131, filed Sep. 5, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Dec. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,179, filed Sep. 18, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jan. 12, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Feb. 8, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,781, filed Nov. 17, 2014. |
Final Office Action, Sep. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,841, filed Apr. 2, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,781, filed Nov. 17, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Oct. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,949, filed Jun. 9, 2015. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability, Mar. 7, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,781, filed Nov. 17, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Feb. 16, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,167, filed Apr. 8, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Mar. 2, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,841, filed Apr. 2, 2015. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability, Mar. 14, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,841, filed Apr. 2, 2015. |
Advisory Action, Mar. 21, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, May 3, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, Jun. 3, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,179, filed Sep. 18, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jun. 15, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,533, filed Apr. 5, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jun. 22, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,505, filed Jul. 30, 2014. |
Final Office Action, Jul. 19, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,131, filed Sep. 5, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jul. 25, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,619, filed Oct. 30, 2013. |
Final Office Action, Jul. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 10, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/148,933, filed May 6, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance, Aug. 24, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,534, filed Sep. 17, 2012. |
Final Office Action, Oct. 4, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,533, filed Apr. 5, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, Oct. 6, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,131, filed Sep. 5, 2014. |
Request for Trial Granted, Jan. 2, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005. |
Allowance, Oct. 23, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005. |
Decision on Appeal, Sep. 17, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief, Oct. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005. |
Request for Trial Granted, Jan. 2, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005. |
Allowance, Aug. 30, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005. |
Decision on Appeal, Jun. 28, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief, Oct. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005. |
Allowance, Apr. 28, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/357,657, filed Feb. 16, 2006. |
Allowance, Sep. 8, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,755, filed Oct. 31, 2005. |
Final, May 11, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,755, filed Oct. 31, 2005. |
Allowance, Feb. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Non-Final, Jul. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Final, Aug. 12, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Advisory, Oct. 2, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Non-Final, Oct. 9, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Advisory, Jul. 16, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Allowance, Dec. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006. |
Decision on Appeal, Nov. 14, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief, Oct. 14, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006. |
Allowance, Dec. 3, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,239, filed Apr. 27, 2007. |
Allowance, Jan. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008. |
Non-Final, Aug. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008. |
Advisory, Jan. 29, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008. |
Advisory, Jul. 2, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008. |
Allowance, Feb. 29, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,440, filed Jul. 5, 2007. |
Allowance, Nov. 12, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,497, filed Jul. 5, 2007. |
Allowance, Feb. 11, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/903,416, filed Sep. 20, 2007. |
Allowance, May 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/998,726, filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Advisory, May 23, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/998,726, filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Allowance, Mar. 21, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,796, filed Feb. 20, 2008. |
Allowance, Mar. 16, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/151,839, filed May 8, 2008. |
Final, Jan. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008. |
Non-Final, Jul. 1, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008. |
Advisory, Aug. 20, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008. |
Allowance, Jan. 20, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,324, filed Nov. 19, 2009. |
Allowance, Dec. 9, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,324, filed Nov. 19, 2009. |
Allowance, Mar. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/112,936, filed May 20, 2011. |
Non-Final, Oct. 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Allowance, Jan. 2, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
Advisory, Sep. 27, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
Final, Jul. 17, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
Advisory, Jan. 24, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
Allowance, Feb. 19, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321, filed May 29, 2012. |
Allowance, Sep. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,575, filed Jun. 13, 2012. |
Advisory, Apr. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,575, filed Jun. 13, 2012. |
Allowance, Jan. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,548, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
Non-Final, Jan. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,548, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
Allowance, Nov. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,517, filed Jun. 13, 2013. |
Non-Final, Aug. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,517, filed Jun. 13, 2013. |
Office Action, Nov. 20, 2012, filed Jul. 3, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440. |
Office Action, Jan. 3, 2013, filed May 29, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321. |
Office Action, Jan. 11, 2013, filed Jun. 13, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,575. |
Office Action, Feb. 1, 2013, filed Feb. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,796. |
Office Action, Apr. 2, 2013, filed Mar. 22, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422. |
Office Action, Apr. 15, 2013, filed Aug. 2, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491. |
Office Action, Feb. 4, 2013, filed Aug. 2, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473. |
Final Office Action, Jan. 12, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance, Jan. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,188, filed Apr. 8, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Nov. 26, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/333,486, filed Jul. 16, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, Dec. 22, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/333,486, filed Jul. 16, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, Dec. 31, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,534, filed Sep. 17, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, Jan. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/548,195, filed Nov. 19, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130117494 A1 | May 2013 | US |