Optimizing available computing resources within a virtual environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9626224
  • Patent Number
    9,626,224
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 3, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Methods and systems for the optimization of available computing resources within a virtual environment are disclosed. An exemplary method comprises determining the sizes of the computing resources available to the virtual machine and determining optimal data structures for the virtual machine based on the sizes of the computing resources. The optimal data structures may include an indexing data structure and a historic data. The method may further comprise allocating a Random Access Memory (RAM) and disk storage to the optimal data structures and configuring the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage. The optimization of data structures involves balancing requirements of the indexing data structure and the historic data.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to the allocation of computing resources and, more particularly, to methods and systems for the optimization of available and allocated computing resources for a virtual machine.


DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

The approaches described in this section could be pursued but are not necessarily approaches that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.


In current computing network environments, the utilization of virtual machines is widely deployed. A virtual machine (VM) is a software implementation of a machine (e.g. a computer) that executes computer programs similarly to a physical computer. Multiple virtual machines can be created within a single physical computer. Each virtual machine may run its own operating system and other software so that a single physical computer may include a plurality of virtual machines running independently of each other. Such a physical computer can be used as a host computer within a computer network and allow users to access its resident virtual machines from remote locations. A virtual machine environment can be used to isolate a certain computer program so it is executed within a secure manner through the usage of the virtual environment.


Virtual machines embedded within the host computer can logically share its computing resources, such as processors, storage, auxiliary memory, Random Access Memory (RAM), and other physical appliances that are included in the physical computer, to create their own virtual computing resources. In other words, each virtual machine may use a part of the shared computing resources to execute its own specific tasks such as running the operating system and other applications.


Thus, a virtual environment requires resource allocation before the users may utilize the virtual machines. The resources can be allocated evenly or depending on the typical tasks performed by a specific virtual machine. Users can adjust the allocation of resources to increase or decrease resources for each virtual machine.


Accordingly, each time a virtual machine is booted, it can be provided with new amounts of computing resources. In such a changing environment, the allocated computing resources are not optimized and the overall virtual machine performance deteriorates. Hence, the virtual machines may require optimization of the allocated computing resources each time they are changed.


SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.


In accordance with various embodiments and the corresponding disclosure thereof, a method for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine is disclosed. The method may comprise determining the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine and determining optimal data structures for the virtual machine based on the determination. The optimal data structures may include an indexing data, historic data, and other data structures. The method may further comprise allocating a RAM and disk storage to the optimal data structures and configuring the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage.


According to various exemplary embodiments, the computing resources may include the RAM, a Central Processing Unit (CPU), the disk storage, and a VM container. The optimal data structure sizes can be based on specific historical data. The optimal data structures can be based on the relative sizes of the indexing data structure and the historic data. The indexing data structures may include at least one hash table, while the historic data may comprise a flow history pages table. The determining of optimal data structures may comprise determining optimal sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables and the flow history pages table. The optimal sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables can be determined through an iterative process. Determining the sizes of the computing resources may comprise requesting a virtual machine manager to provide information related to allocated resources and/or acquiring usage metrics for computing resources.


Also disclosed is a system for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine. The system may comprise: a size determination module configured to determine the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine, an optimal data structure determination module configured to determine optimal data structures for the virtual machine, an allocation module configured to allocate RAM and a disk storage to the optimal data structures, and a configuration module to configure the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage. The system may further and optionally comprise a communication module configured to communicate, to a further virtual machine, information related to the optimal data structures for the virtual machine.


Also disclosed is a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, which when executed by one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to implement the method for optimization of resources within a virtual machine.


To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or more aspects comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative features of the one or more aspects. These features are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of various aspects may be employed, and this description is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a host computer suitable for embedding virtual machines.



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of the host computers and allocation of computing resources to virtual machines.



FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a computer network environment suitable for implementing virtual machines.



FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a computer network environment suitable for implementing virtual machines.



FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a data structure configuration.



FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a data structure configuration.



FIG. 7 shows a diagram of a system for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine.



FIG. 8 shows a process flow diagram of a method for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine.



FIG. 9 is a diagrammatic representation of an exemplary machine in the form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, is executed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show illustrations, in accordance with exemplary embodiments. These exemplary embodiments, which are also referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. The embodiments can be combined, other embodiments can be utilized, or structural, logical and electrical changes can be made without departing from the scope of what is claimed. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.


According to various embodiments disclosed herein, methods for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine are disclosed. The methods may provide an intelligent and effective way of optimizing available and previously allocated computing resources for each virtual machine within a virtual machine container. The computing resources can be optimized so that the size of the data structures associated with a RAM and disk storage can provide effective usage of these resources and increase overall performance.


A virtual machine is a software implementation of a machine that may execute software programs like a physical machine. An important characteristic of a virtual machine is that the software running inside is limited to the resources and abstractions allocated to the virtual machine by its host computer.


A hypervisor may refer to a hardware virtualization technique that runs inside the host computer and manages the execution of virtual machine within the host computer. A virtual machine manager is a virtual-machine manager application which may be utilized to configure the virtual machine. In contrast to the hypervisor which runs inside the host computer, the virtual machine manager may run inside or outside the host computer.


When a virtual machine is booted, the sizes of the computing resources available to the virtual machine may be determined through a request to the virtual machine manager or to the hypervisor to provide information related to the allocated resources.


In some examples, the sizes of computing resources can be determined by analyzing metrics data obtained from the virtual machine manager or by request to the operating system of the host computer.


The term “computing resources,” as used herein, may refer to one or more of the following: a RAM, a CPU, disk storage, and a Virtual Machine container. The virtual machine container may be associated with the physical resources of a host computer. Accordingly, the size of the virtual machine container may be determined by the amount of physical resources, such as a CPU, a memory, storage, a network bandwidth, and/or an input/output (I/O) bandwidth available to the virtual machine container.


Once the sizes of the allocated computing resources are determined, the optimal data structures for the virtual machine are determined based on the sizes of the allocated computing resources. Generally, the data structures may include an indexing data structure and historic data, which are correlated. In one example, the indexing data structure includes at least one hash table that maps calculated hash functions related to various data fragments to their indexes (e.g., memory addresses where such data is stored). As is described below in more detail, several hash tables may be provided, such as a coarse hash table and a fine hash table. The historic data is a typical data structure that maps the data fragments to their identifying keys (e.g., addresses).


One particular example of the historic data is a flow history pages table. Accordingly, the determination of optimal data structures for the virtual machine may include defining optimal sizes of the indexing data structure and the historic data. Such sizes can be calculated in many ways, and may generally be iterative and statistical. In some examples, the optimal sizes of these data structures (e.g., tables) may be based on an analysis of certain historical data including, for example, previously calculated sizes of these data structures related to certain sizes of allocated resources of the same or a different virtual machine. The optimization of data structure table sizes may include finding a balance between the requirements of the indexing data structure and the historic data.


Once the optimal data structures are determined for the virtual machine, the RAM and/or the disk storage can be allocated to the optimal data structures. Thus, given certain sizes of the available resources, data structures are allocated resources to provide efficient and fast data retrieval, transfer, and storage. As a result, the overall operation efficiency of the virtual machine may be increased. In addition, the optimal data structures within the RAM and the disk storage may be periodically reconfigured to meet the changing conditions of the available computing resources.


The following provides a detailed description of various exemplary embodiments related to methods and systems for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine.


Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a block diagram illustrating a host computer 100 suitable for embedding virtual machines. The host computer 100 may comprise one or more processors 110, a memory 120, and a communication interface 130.


The processor 110 may refer to a computer appliance that carries out computer program instructions to perform basic arithmetical, logical, and I/O operations. The processor 110 may be implemented as a CPU, a controller, a microcontroller, and so forth.


The memory 120 may refer to disk storage (e.g., a hard disk drive), a RAM, a Read Only Memory (ROM), and other types of volatile or nonvolatile data storages.


A communication interface 130 can be used to connect the host computer 100 to various I/O peripheral devices that may be provided, including a keyboard, a mouse, a display, a communication port, a modem, and so forth.


In the example shown, the memory 120 may store, among other things, software operating system 140, software implementing virtual machines 150, and software applications 160. The operating system 140 may be configured to execute a number of software modules and applications and generate one or more virtual machines (e.g., Virtual Machine 1, Virtual Machine 2, . . . Virtual Machine N). Generally, the virtual machines 150 can be generated using any of the technologies presently known to those skilled in the art. At each time instance, one or more virtual machines 150 can be executed by the host computer 100.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the host computer 100 and a way of allocating computing resources to different virtual machines. As shown, the host computer 100 may comprise physical computing resources, namely a CPU 110, a RAM 210, and disk storage 220. These computing resources may be virtually partitioned in such a way that some parts of CPU processing power 110-1, some parts of the RAM 210-1, and some parts of the disk storage 220-1 are allocated to the Virtual Machine 1150. Similarly, a part of CPU processing power 110-2, a part of the RAM 210-2, and a part of the disk storage 220-2 are allocated to the Virtual Machine 2150. Each allocated part can be of any size. For instance, the computing resources can be uniformly partitioned or some parts can be bigger or smaller than others. In some exemplary embodiments, a minimum size for each part of the computing resources can be defined such that it would be impossible to allocate a smaller part of resources than specified by the minimum size. Similarly, a maximum size for each part of computing resources can be predefined.



FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram showing a computer network environment 300 suitable for implementing virtual machines. The computer network environment 300 may comprise one or more computing appliances 310, communication appliances 340, host computers 100, virtual machine managers (VMM) 320, and a network 330. The network 330 may couple one or more of the aforementioned modules. Such a computer network environment 300 can also be known as a network memory system. It will be understood that the host 100 can be either physical or virtual. Additionally, even though FIG. 3 illustrates two VMMs 320 managing respective VMs 150, in some embodiments, a single VMM 320 may manage both VMs 150. Furthermore, VMMs 320 may be internal or external with respect to their respective hosts 100. By optimally allocating resources between various data structures within the virtual machines 150, data packets are optimized as they travel between computing appliances 310.


Even though the host computers 100 and the VMs 150 are shown as being in line with the computing appliances 310, this may not necessarily be the fact. For example, the data packets can be redirected to the host computers 100 and VMs 150 located elsewhere. In any case, either physically or virtually, these data packets are flowing through the VMs 150.


The network 330 is a network of data processing nodes interconnected for the purpose of data communication, which may be utilized to communicatively couple various components of the environment 300. The network 330 may include the Internet or any other network capable of communicating data between devices. Suitable networks may include or interface with any one or more of, for instance, a local intranet, a PAN (Personal Area Network), a LAN (Local Area Network), a WAN (Wide Area Network), a MAN (Metropolitan Area Network), a VPN (virtual private network), a SAN (storage area network), a frame relay connection, an AIN (Advanced Intelligent Network connection), a SONET (synchronous optical network connection), a digital T1, T3, E1 or E3 line, DDS (Digital Data Service) connection, DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) connection, an Ethernet connection, an ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) line, a dial-up port, such as a V.90, V.34 or V.34bis analog modem connection, a cable modem, an ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) connection, or an FDDI (Fiber Distributed Data Interface) or CDDI (Copper Distributed Data Interface) connection. Furthermore, communications may also include links to any of a variety of wireless networks, including WAP (Wireless Application Protocol), GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) or TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access), cellular phone networks, GPS (Global Positioning System), CDPD (cellular digital packet data), RIM (Research in Motion, Limited) duplex paging network, Bluetooth radio, or an IEEE 802.11-based radio frequency network. The network 330 may further include or interface with any one or more of an RS-232 serial connection, an IEEE-1394 (Firewire) connection, a Fiber Channel connection, an IrDA (infrared) port, a SCSI (Small Computer Systems Interface) connection, a USB (Universal Serial Bus) connection or other wired or wireless, digital or analog interface or connection, mesh or Digi® networking.


Each computing appliance 310 may refer to a server, a storage system, computer, a laptop, a tablet computer, a portable computing device, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a handheld cellular phone, a mobile phone, a smart phone, a handheld device having wire or wireless connection capability, or any other electronic device suitable for communicating data via the network 330.


The computing appliance 310 may be configured to interact with the host computer 100 and transfer data over the network 330. The VMM 320 can be located within or without the host computer 100 and configured to run the virtual machine 150. The virtual machines 150 may provide a complete system platform, which may emulate the execution of an operating system and one or more software applications.


The virtual machine manager 320 or the hypervisor (not shown but described above) can be implemented as hardware, software or a combination thereof to generate, manage and allow multiple virtual machines 150 to run concurrently on the host computer 100. The virtual machine manager 320 can be implemented as a separate appliance as shown in the figure; however, in certain embodiments, it can be integrated within the host computer 100. When implemented separately, the virtual machine manager 320 can be interrelated with the host computer 100 directly or via the network 330.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a simplified data structure configuration 400. Various data structures can be disposed within a RAM 450 and a disk 460 allocated to the VM 150. As shown in FIG. 4, the amount of RAM 450 and disk 460 allocated to the VM 150 may be shared between an indexing data structure 410, historic data 420, and other data structures 430.


If it is determined that the current allocation of RAM 450 to the indexing data structure 410 and historic data 420 is suboptimal, the amount of the RAM 450 and the disk 460 available to these data structures can be reallocated by the software running on the VM 150 inside the host computer 100. For example, the amount of the RAM 450 available to the indexing data structure 410 may be increased so that there is more space to point to the information on the disk 460. As already mentioned above, the historic data 420 may be composed by saving data from data packets that are traversed between the computing appliances 310 shown in FIG. 3. The historic data 420 can be stored on the disk 460 and may include various content such as symbols and/or labels related to the history of events that occurred in the past.


The amount of the historic data 420 that traverses the VM 150 may be quiet large. Accordingly, only a subset of the historic data 420 may be stored in the RAM 450. This subset of the historic data is lost when the host computer 100 is turned off. The amount of the historic data 420 currently stored in the RAM 450 may not be optimal for the size of the RAM 450 available to the VM 150 and the current partitioning of the RAM 450 between the indexing data structure 410 and the historic data 420. In response, the VMM 320 may decide to move some of the historic data 420 from the RAM 450 to the disk 460. As some historic data 420 is moved to the disk 460 to free the RAM 450, the VMM 320 may increase the amount of the RAM 450 available to the indexing data structure 410 to better allocate resources between a subset of the historic data 420 and the indexing data structure 410.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a simplified data structure configuration 500. The data structure configuration 500 can be utilized to store and organize data so that the stored data can be efficiently retrieved, searched, stored, and transferred.


In the example shown, the data structure configuration 500 may comprise an indexing data structure 510 and a historic data 520. In some exemplary embodiments, the indexing data structure 510 can be utilized in the RAM 450, while the historic data 520 can be utilized in the disk storage 460.


The historic data 520 may keep (where possible) storing the data packets sequentially as they flow between the computing appliances into a continuous sequence of data in order to optimize use of the disk. Indices 512 and 514 may represent hash entry points into that the sequence of the historic data 520. Preferably, the historic data 520 is not divided into data elements and, therefore, there may be no one-to-one correspondence between indices of the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520. For example, the index 512 may point to a byte 522 and index 514 may point to a byte 528. Bytes 524 and 526 may have no indices pointed to them at all. Additionally, the indices 512 and 514 may be associated with hash values that are internal or external (depending on how big the hash table is) to the indexing data structure 510. In some embodiments, the historic data 520 may be delineated by a rolling hash function or Rabin fingerprinting scheme. For example, the rolling hash function may provide a rolling hash for every byte of the historic data 520 and matching a certain predetermined criteria.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a simplified data structure configuration 600. The data structure configuration 600 can be disposed within the VM 150 to store and organize data therein so that the stored data can be efficiently retrieved, searched, stored, and transferred. According to this exemplary embodiment, the data structures may include a fine signature hash table (SHT) 605, a coarse signature hash table (SHT) 625, and flow history pages (also called historic data) (FHPs) 645.


The fine SHT 605 may include one or more entries comprising, for example, a check field 610 and a page field 615. The coarse SHT 625 may include one or more entries comprising a check field 620 and a page field 630. The FHPs 645 may include one or more pages (e.g., pages 1 to M). Each page (e.g., page N) may include page state information 650 and store data 655.


The virtual machine manager 320 may calculate hashes (i.e., a value returned by a hash function) at every received data element (i.e., a byte). In some embodiments, the data elements can be transferred over the network 330, and thus data elements may include Internet Protocol (IP) data packets or the like. The hashes in this case may be influenced by preceding bytes in the data flow. For example, the hashes can be influenced by n previous bytes. In this case, some examples of calculating the hashes may include cyclical redundancy checks (CRCs) and checksums over the previous n bytes of the data flow. In some embodiments, rolling implementations of CRCs and checksums can be used where a new byte is added, and a byte from n bytes earlier is removed.


Each calculated hash can be filtered by a fine filter 660 and a coarse filter 665. The VMM 320 may designate the locations in the data flow that meet the fine and coarse filter criteria as fine and coarse sync-points, respectively. The fine filter 660 and the coarse filter 665 may have different filter criteria. Typically, the filter criteria for the coarse filter 665 is more restrictive and may be used to further filter those hashes which pass the fine filter 660. In other words, the fine filter 660 may produce a fine comb of sync-points, and the coarse filter may produce a coarse comb of sync-points. One example of the filter criteria is the null filter, which allows results in sync-points at all locations. In another example, the filter criteria declares a fine sync-point when the top five bits of the hashes are all zeros, and a coarse filter criteria that stores or compares hashes when the top ten bits of the hashes are all zeros. The hashes at the fine sync-points index the fine SHT 605, and the hashes at the coarse sync-points index the coarse SHT 625. For example, the index could be derived from the hash by using a number of low order bits from the hash. The filter criteria affect the sizing of the SHTs 605 and 625 and the probability of matching a hash in the SHTs 605 and 625. The more sync-points that are generated, the easier it is to identify repeated data but the larger the tables (i.e., the SHTs 605 and 625) need to be in order to index a given amount of information for the data flow. Having a coarse and fine table helps optimize this tradeoff. Alternative implementations may use a single table or multiple tables.


The fine SHT 605 can be populated with hashes as the data is stored and when the data is recalled from disk storage 220 or other locally accessible storage. The fine SHT 605 finely indexes the received data. In some embodiments, the fine SHT 605 may hold approximately one entry for every 100 bytes of the received data. The coarse SHT 625 can be populated as the data is stored and is coarsely indexed. For example, the coarse SHT 625 may hold one entry for approximately every 4 kilobytes (KB) of the data. The fine SHT 605 and the coarse SHT 625 may be also considered short term and long term memory index structures, respectively.


In this example, VM 150 may include a fine SHT 605, a coarse filter 665, and a FHP 645 data structure, and the computing appliance 310 may also include a fine SHT 605, a coarse filter 665, and a FHP 645 data structure. Each appliance in the computer network environments 300 or 400 may maintain the separate data structures, with may include separate filter criteria for the fine filters 660 and the coarse filters 665. The page state information 650, in the FHP 645 of each appliance in the computer network environments 300 or 400, includes page parameters, page ownership permissions, peer state, and a list of valid byte ranges for each appliance in the computer network environments 300 or 400. Those skilled in the art would appreciate that the data structure 510 and historic data 520 can be differently established and managed, depending on specific application.



FIG. 7 is a diagram of a system 700 for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine. In this embodiment, the system 700 for the optimization of resources within the virtual machine may include a size determination module 710, an optimal data structure determination module 720, an allocation module 730, a configuration module 740, and a communication module 750.


In other embodiments, the system 700 for optimization of resources within the virtual machine may include additional, fewer, or different modules for various applications. Furthermore, all modules can be integrated within a single apparatus, or, alternatively, can be remotely located and optionally be accessed via a third party.


The size determination module 710 may be configured to determine the sizes of computing resources available to a virtual machine 150. This determination can be performed by requesting the virtual machine manager 320 or, in some examples, the host computer 100, to provide the sizes of allocated resources. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the size determination module 710 may measure or in some other way acquire computing resources usage metrics in order to determine the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine. Typical computing resources metrics may include the number of used processors, allocated memory resources including RAM and disk storage, memory hierarchy, memory organization, communication latency, bandwidth, and so forth.


The optimal data structure determination module 720 can be configured to determine optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150. In some examples, the optimal data structures may include the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520 as described above with reference to FIG. 5. The determination of optimal data structures can be performed in various ways, but in any case, they depend on the determined sizes of the available computing resources. The determination of optimal data structures includes the calculation of the optimal sizes of tables (arrays) used in the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520 such that there is the right balance between them. In other words, the size of the indexing data structure 510 depends on the size of the historic data 520, and the optimal sizes may be either defined based on an iteration calculation process, a statistical method, or prior historical data of the considered virtual machine 150 or any other virtual machine in the container (in this case, the virtual machine 150 may generate a request to the VMM 320 or any other virtual machine 150 in the container to acquire such historical data, although other ways of acquiring the historical data can be used). Those skilled in the art would appreciate that multiple methods of determining optimal sizes are applicable.


In general, the determination of optimal data structures is a tradeoff of the sizes related to the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520. For example, if the virtual machine 150 is provided with additional space in the disk storage 220, a new balance should be determined to optimize used data structures. In this case, when the historic data 520 associated with the disk storage 220 is increased, the stored data should be properly indexed, and thus the indexing data structure 510 associated with the RAM 210 is in need for optimization to be enabled to effectively index all data stored in the extended disk storage 220. Alternatively, for example, when the indexing data structure 510 is provided with a large size, but the historic data 520 is relatively small, the exceeded size of the indexing data structure 510 will be useless, while some data cannot even get data reduction. Thus, the optimization process of optimal data structures is the way of adapting sizes of data structures (e.g., table sizes) as used in the virtual machine 150 responsive to the size of available computing resources that were already allocated to the virtual machine 150.


The allocation module 730 can be configured to allocate the computing resources (such as the RAM 210 and the disk storage 220 to the optimal data structures, as determined by the optimal data structure determination module 720).


The configuration module 740 can be used to configure the optimal data structures within the RAM 210 and the disk storage 220. The configuring can be performed in real time to tie the virtual machine 150 to a changing computing resources environment. Thus, the optimization of allocated resources can be performed dynamically.


The communication module 750 can be configured to communicate, to a further virtual machine 150 or a virtual machine manager 320, information related to the optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150. The communication of such information can be performed based on requests received or on an ongoing basis (for example, each time the computing resources for certain virtual machine 150 are optimized).



FIG. 8 is a process flow diagram showing a method 800 for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine. The method 800 may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., dedicated logic, programmable logic, and microcode), software (such as software run on a general-purpose computer system or a dedicated machine), or a combination of both. In one exemplary embodiment, the processing logic resides at the VM 150 or the virtual machine manager 320.


The method 800 can be performed by various modules discussed above with reference to FIG. 7. Each of these modules can comprise processing logic. It will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill that examples of the foregoing modules may be virtual, and instructions said to be executed by a module may, in fact, be retrieved and executed by a processor. Although various modules may be configured to perform some or all of various steps described herein, fewer or more modules may be provided and still fall within the scope of various embodiments.


As shown in FIG. 8, the method 800 may commence at operation 810 with the size determination module 710 determining the sizes of computing resources available to the virtual machine 150. The determination can be implemented by requesting that the virtual machine manager 320 and/or the host computer 100 provide information about the sizes of allocated and available computing resources. In some other examples, this determination can be implemented by acquiring and processing computing resources usage metrics.


At operation 820, the optimal data structure determination module 720 determines optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150. As described above, the optimal data structure is based on the determined sizes of the available computing resources. The determination of optimal data structures may include the calculation of an optimal size balance between the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520. The optimal sizes may be determined based on an iteration calculation process, a statistical method, or prior historical data of the considered virtual machine 150 or any other virtual machine in the container. Even though allocating the available computing resources between the indexing data structure 510 and the historic data 520 is important, it will be appreciated that the systems and methods described herein are not limited to such data structures and can involve allocating resources among other resources within the RAM and/or storage.


At operation 830, the allocation module 730 allocates the computing resources, such as the RAM 2101-N and the disk storage 2201-N, to the data structures as determined at operation 820. At operation 840, the configuration module 740 configures the optimal data structures within the RAM 2101-N and the disk storage 2201-N.


At optional operation 850, the communication module 750 may communicate, to a further virtual machine 150 or a virtual machine manager 320, information related to the optimal data structures for the virtual machine 150.



FIG. 9 shows a diagrammatic representation of a computing device for a machine in the exemplary electronic form of a computer system 900, within which a set of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein can be executed. In various exemplary embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or can be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine can operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a server-client network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment. The machine can be a server, storage system, personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a cellular telephone, a web appliance, a network router, a switch, a bridge, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine. Further, while only a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.


The exemplary computer system 900 includes a processor or multiple processors 902 (e.g., a CPU), and a main memory 904, which communicate with each other via a bus 906. The computer system 900 can further include storage 908 and a network interface device 910.


The storage 908 may include a one or more computer-readable media 912, which stores one or more sets of instructions and data structures (e.g., instructions 914) embodying or utilized by any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 914 can also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 904 and/or within the processors 902 during execution thereof by the computer system 900. The main memory 904 and the processors 902 also constitute machine-readable media. The instructions 914 can further be transmitted or received over the network 330 via the network interface device 910 utilizing any one of a number of well-known transfer protocols (e.g., Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), CAN, Serial, and Modbus).


While the computer-readable medium 912 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “computer-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that causes the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present application, or that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying data structures utilized by or associated with such a set of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media. Such media can also include, without limitation, hard disks, floppy disks, flash memory cards, digital video disks, RAMs, ROMs, and the like.


The exemplary embodiments described herein can be implemented in an operating environment comprising computer-executable instructions (e.g., software) installed on a computer, in hardware, or in a combination of software and hardware. The computer-executable instructions can be written in a computer programming language or can be embodied in firmware logic. If written in a programming language conforming to a recognized standard, such instructions can be executed on a variety of hardware platforms and for interfaces to a variety of operating systems. Although not limited thereto, computer software programs for implementing the present method can be written in any number of suitable programming languages such as, for example, Java, C, C++, Perl, Visual Basic, or other compilers, assemblers, interpreters or other computer languages or platforms.


Thus, a computer-implemented method and systems for the optimization of resources within a virtual machine are described. These methods and systems may effectively be used to optimize balances between the sizes of used data structures responsive to the changed sizes of computing resources allocated to a virtual machine. Thus, the overall performance of the virtual machine is increased.


Although embodiments have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes can be made to these exemplary embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present application. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method for apportioning resources within a virtual machine, the method comprising: discovering allotted computing resources available to the virtual machine, the allotted computing resources including at least a Random Access Memory (RAM) and a disk storage;determining, in an iterative process, an apportionment of each of the discovered allotted computing resources, to at least two data structures for the virtual machine, wherein the at least two data structures comprise a historic packet data store including at least a portion of a payload of data packets extracted sequentially from flows of network data traveling across a network and an indexing data structure that indexes the historic packet data;dynamically allocating, independently from a host server and according to the determined apportionment, a portion of the Random Access Memory (RAM) and a portion of the disk storage available to the virtual machine to each of the at least two data structures from the discovered allotted computing resources available to the virtual machine; andconfiguring according to the determined apportionment the at least two data structures within the RAM available to the virtual machine and configuring according to the determined apportionment the at least two data structures within the disk storage available to the virtual machine.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising communicating, to a further virtual machine, information related to the data structures for the virtual machine.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the computing resources further include a Central Processing Unit (CPU) and a Virtual Machine (VM) container.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the data structure sizes are affected by specific historical measurements.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the data structures are based on relative sizes between the indexing data structure and the historic packet data, such that the size of the indexing data structure depends on the size of the historic packet data.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the indexing data structure comprises one or more signature array hash tables, and the historic packet data comprises flow history pages.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein determining the indexing data structure comprises determining sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables and the flow history pages.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the determining sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables is an iterative process.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the discovering allotted computing resources available to the virtual machine comprises requesting a virtual machine manager to provide information related to allotted resources and/or acquiring computing resources usage metrics.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: storing the historic packet data within the virtual machine; andupdating contents of at least one hash table within the virtual machine based on the historic packet data.
  • 11. A system for apportioning resources within a virtual machine, comprising: a processor to execute modules, the modules comprising:a determination module configured to discover computing resources available to the virtual machine, the computing resources including at least a Random Access Memory (RAM) and a disk storage;a data structure determination module configured to iteratively determine an apportionment of each of the discovered computing resources to at least two data structures for the virtual machine, the data structures comprising a historic packet data store including at least a portion of a payload of data packets extracted sequentially from flows of network data traveling across a network and an indexing data structure that indexes the historic packet data;an allocation module configured to dynamically allocate, independently from a host server and according to the determined apportionment, a portion of the Random Access Memory (RAM) and a portion of the disk storage available to the virtual machine to each of the at least two data structures, from the discovered computing resources available to the virtual machine; anda configuration module to configure according to the determined apportionment the at least two data structures within the RAM available to the virtual machine and configure according to the determined apportionment the at least two data structures within the disk storage available to the virtual machine.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, further comprising a communication module configured to communicate, to a further virtual machine, information related to the data structures for the virtual machine.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the data structure sizes are based on specific historical packet data.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the data structures are based on relative sizes between the indexing data structure and the historic packet data.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, further comprising a paged memory system for the data structures.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the indexing data structure comprises one or more signature array hash tables and the historic packet data comprises a flow history pages table.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the data structure determination module is further configured to determine sizes of the one or more signature array hash tables and the flow history pages table.
  • 18. The system of claim 11, wherein the determination module is further configured to request a virtual machine manager to provide information related to allotted resources and/or acquire computing resources usage metrics in order to discover alloted computing resources available to the virtual machine.
  • 19. The system of claim 11, wherein the data structure determination module is further configured to store the historic packet data within the virtual machine, and update contents of at least one hash table within the virtual machine based on the historic packet data.
  • 20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, which when executed by one or more computers, causes the one or more computers to: discover allotted computing resources available to a virtual machine, the allotted computing resources including at least a Random Access Memory (RAM) and a disk storage;iteratively determine an apportionment of each of the discovered allotted computing resources, to at least two data structures for the virtual machine, wherein the at least two data structures comprise a historic packet data store including at least a portion of a payload of data packets extracted sequentially from flows of network data traveling across a network and an indexing data structure that indexes the historic packet data;dynamically allocate, independently from a host server and according to the determined apportionment, a portion of the Random Access Memory (RAM) and a portion of the disk storage available to the virtual machine to each of the at least two data structures from the discovered allotted computing resources available to the virtual machine; andconfigure according to the determined apportionment the at least two data structures within the RAM available to the virtual machine and configure according to the determined apportionment the at least two data structures within the disk storage available to the virtual machine.
US Referenced Citations (421)
Number Name Date Kind
4494108 Langdon, Jr. et al. Jan 1985 A
4558302 Welch Dec 1985 A
4612532 Bacon et al. Sep 1986 A
5023611 Chamzas et al. Jun 1991 A
5243341 Seroussi et al. Sep 1993 A
5307413 Denzer Apr 1994 A
5357250 Healey et al. Oct 1994 A
5359720 Tamura et al. Oct 1994 A
5373290 Lempel et al. Dec 1994 A
5483556 Pillan et al. Jan 1996 A
5532693 Winters et al. Jul 1996 A
5592613 Miyazawa et al. Jan 1997 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5627533 Clark May 1997 A
5635932 Shinagawa et al. Jun 1997 A
5652581 Furlan et al. Jul 1997 A
5659737 Matsuda Aug 1997 A
5675587 Okuyama et al. Oct 1997 A
5710562 Gormish et al. Jan 1998 A
5748122 Shinagawa et al. May 1998 A
5754774 Bittinger et al. May 1998 A
5802106 Packer Sep 1998 A
5805822 Long et al. Sep 1998 A
5883891 Williams et al. Mar 1999 A
5903230 Masenas May 1999 A
5955976 Heath Sep 1999 A
6000053 Levine et al. Dec 1999 A
6003087 Housel, III et al. Dec 1999 A
6054943 Lawrence Apr 2000 A
6081883 Popelka et al. Jun 2000 A
6084855 Soirinsuo et al. Jul 2000 A
6175944 Urbanke et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191710 Waletzki Feb 2001 B1
6295541 Bodnar et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308148 Bruins et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311260 Stone et al. Oct 2001 B1
6339616 Kovalev Jan 2002 B1
6374266 Shnelvar Apr 2002 B1
6434641 Haupt et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434662 Greene et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438664 McGrath et al. Aug 2002 B1
6452915 Jorgensen Sep 2002 B1
6489902 Heath Dec 2002 B2
6493698 Beylin Dec 2002 B1
6570511 Cooper May 2003 B1
6587985 Fukushima et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614368 Cooper Sep 2003 B1
6618397 Huang Sep 2003 B1
6633953 Stark Oct 2003 B2
6643259 Borella et al. Nov 2003 B1
6650644 Colley et al. Nov 2003 B1
6653954 Rijavec Nov 2003 B2
6667700 McCanne et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674769 Viswanath Jan 2004 B1
6718361 Basani et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728840 Shatil et al. Apr 2004 B1
6738379 Balazinski et al. May 2004 B1
6769048 Goldberg et al. Jul 2004 B2
6791945 Levenson et al. Sep 2004 B1
6856651 Singh Feb 2005 B2
6859842 Nakamichi et al. Feb 2005 B1
6862602 Guha Mar 2005 B2
6910106 Sechrest et al. Jun 2005 B2
6963980 Mattsson Nov 2005 B1
6968374 Lemieux et al. Nov 2005 B2
6978384 Milliken Dec 2005 B1
7007044 Rafert et al. Feb 2006 B1
7020750 Thiyagaranjan et al. Mar 2006 B2
7035214 Seddigh et al. Apr 2006 B1
7047281 Kausik May 2006 B1
7069268 Burns et al. Jun 2006 B1
7069342 Biederman Jun 2006 B1
7110407 Khanna Sep 2006 B1
7111005 Wessman Sep 2006 B1
7113962 Kee et al. Sep 2006 B1
7120666 McCanne et al. Oct 2006 B2
7145889 Zhang et al. Dec 2006 B1
7197597 Scheid et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200847 Straube et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215667 Davis May 2007 B1
7242681 Van Bokkelen et al. Jul 2007 B1
7243094 Tabellion et al. Jul 2007 B2
7266645 Garg et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278016 Detrick et al. Oct 2007 B1
7318100 Demmer et al. Jan 2008 B2
7366829 Luttrell et al. Apr 2008 B1
7380006 Srinivas et al. May 2008 B2
7383329 Erickson Jun 2008 B2
7383348 Seki et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388844 Brown et al. Jun 2008 B1
7389357 Duffie, III et al. Jun 2008 B2
7389393 Karr et al. Jun 2008 B1
7417570 Srinivasan et al. Aug 2008 B2
7417991 Crawford et al. Aug 2008 B1
7420992 Fang et al. Sep 2008 B1
7428573 McCanne et al. Sep 2008 B2
7451237 Takekawa et al. Nov 2008 B2
7453379 Plamondon Nov 2008 B2
7454443 Ram et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457315 Smith Nov 2008 B1
7460473 Kodama et al. Dec 2008 B1
7471629 Melpignano Dec 2008 B2
7532134 Samuels et al. May 2009 B2
7555484 Kulkarni et al. Jun 2009 B2
7571343 Xiang et al. Aug 2009 B1
7571344 Hughes et al. Aug 2009 B2
7587401 Yeo et al. Sep 2009 B2
7596802 Border et al. Sep 2009 B2
7619545 Samuels et al. Nov 2009 B2
7620870 Srinivasan et al. Nov 2009 B2
7624446 Wilhelm Nov 2009 B1
7630295 Hughes et al. Dec 2009 B2
7639700 Nabhan et al. Dec 2009 B1
7643426 Lee et al. Jan 2010 B1
7644230 Hughes et al. Jan 2010 B1
7676554 Malmskog et al. Mar 2010 B1
7698431 Hughes Apr 2010 B1
7702843 Chen et al. Apr 2010 B1
7714747 Fallon May 2010 B2
7746781 Xiang Jun 2010 B1
7764606 Ferguson et al. Jul 2010 B1
7810155 Ravi Oct 2010 B1
7827237 Plamondon Nov 2010 B2
7849134 McCanne et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853699 Wu et al. Dec 2010 B2
7873786 Singh et al. Jan 2011 B1
7941606 Pullela et al. May 2011 B1
7945736 Hughes et al. May 2011 B2
7948921 Hughes et al. May 2011 B1
7953869 Demmer et al. May 2011 B2
7970898 Clubb et al. Jun 2011 B2
8069225 McCanne et al. Nov 2011 B2
8072985 Golan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090027 Schneider Jan 2012 B2
8095774 Hughes et al. Jan 2012 B1
8140757 Singh et al. Mar 2012 B1
8171238 Hughes et al. May 2012 B1
8209334 Doerner Jun 2012 B1
8225072 Hughes et al. Jul 2012 B2
8271325 Silverman et al. Sep 2012 B2
8307115 Hughes Nov 2012 B1
8312226 Hughes Nov 2012 B2
8352608 Keagy et al. Jan 2013 B1
8370583 Hughes Feb 2013 B2
8386797 Danilak Feb 2013 B1
8392684 Hughes Mar 2013 B2
8442052 Hughes May 2013 B1
8447740 Huang et al. May 2013 B1
8473714 Hughes et al. Jun 2013 B2
8489562 Hughes et al. Jul 2013 B1
8516158 Wu et al. Aug 2013 B1
8565118 Shukla et al. Oct 2013 B2
8595314 Hughes Nov 2013 B1
8613071 Day et al. Dec 2013 B2
8681614 McCanne et al. Mar 2014 B1
8700771 Ramankutty et al. Apr 2014 B1
8706947 Vincent Apr 2014 B1
8725988 Hughes et al. May 2014 B2
8732423 Hughes May 2014 B1
8738865 Hughes et al. May 2014 B1
8743683 Hughes Jun 2014 B1
8755381 Hughes et al. Jun 2014 B2
8811431 Hughes Aug 2014 B2
8885632 Hughes et al. Nov 2014 B2
8929380 Hughes et al. Jan 2015 B1
8929402 Hughes Jan 2015 B1
8930650 Hughes et al. Jan 2015 B1
9003541 Patidar Apr 2015 B1
9036662 Hughes May 2015 B1
9054876 Yagnik Jun 2015 B1
9092342 Hughes et al. Jul 2015 B2
9130991 Hughes Sep 2015 B2
9143455 Hughes Sep 2015 B1
9152574 Hughes et al. Oct 2015 B2
9191342 Hughes et al. Nov 2015 B2
9253277 Hughes et al. Feb 2016 B2
9306818 Aumann et al. Apr 2016 B2
9363309 Hughes Jun 2016 B2
9397951 Hughes Jul 2016 B1
9438538 Hughes et al. Sep 2016 B2
20010026231 Satoh Oct 2001 A1
20010054084 Kosmynin Dec 2001 A1
20020007413 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010702 Ajtai et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020040475 Yap et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020061027 Abiru et al. May 2002 A1
20020065998 Buckland May 2002 A1
20020071436 Border et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078242 Viswanath Jun 2002 A1
20020101822 Ayyagari et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107988 Jordan Aug 2002 A1
20020116424 Radermacher et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020129158 Zhang et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129260 Benfield et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020131434 Vukovic et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020150041 Reinshmidt et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163911 Wee et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169818 Stewart et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020181494 Rhee Dec 2002 A1
20020188871 Noehring et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194324 Guha Dec 2002 A1
20030002664 Anand Jan 2003 A1
20030009558 Ben-Yehezkel Jan 2003 A1
20030012400 McAuliffe et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030046572 Newman et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030123481 Neale et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030123671 He et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030131079 Neale et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030133568 Stein et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142658 Ofuji et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149661 Mitchell et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030149869 Gleichauf Aug 2003 A1
20030204619 Bays Oct 2003 A1
20030214502 Park et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030214954 Oldak et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233431 Reddy et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040008711 Lahti et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040047308 Kavanagh et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040083299 Dietz et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040086114 Rarick May 2004 A1
20040088376 McCanne et al. May 2004 A1
20040114569 Naden et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117571 Chang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123139 Aiello et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040158644 Albuquerque et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040179542 Murakami et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181679 Dettinger et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199771 Morten et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040202110 Kim Oct 2004 A1
20040203820 Billhartz Oct 2004 A1
20040205332 Bouchard et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040243571 Judd Dec 2004 A1
20040250027 Heflinger Dec 2004 A1
20040255048 Lev Ran et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010653 McCanne Jan 2005 A1
20050044270 Grove et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050053094 Cain et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055372 Springer, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055399 Savchuk Mar 2005 A1
20050071453 Ellis et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050091234 Hsu et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050111460 Sahita May 2005 A1
20050131939 Douglis et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132252 Fifer et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050141425 Foulds Jun 2005 A1
20050171937 Hughes et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050177603 Shavit Aug 2005 A1
20050190694 Ben-Nun et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050207443 Kawamura et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210151 Abdo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050220019 Melpignano Oct 2005 A1
20050235119 Sechrest et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240380 Jones Oct 2005 A1
20050243743 Kimura Nov 2005 A1
20050243835 Sharma et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256972 Cochran et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278459 Boucher et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283355 Itani et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286526 Sood et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060013210 Bordogna et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026425 Douceur et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031936 Nelson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036901 Yang et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060039354 Rao et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045096 Farmer et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059171 Borthakur et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059173 Hirsch et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060117385 Mester et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136913 Sameske Jun 2006 A1
20060143497 Zohar et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060195547 Sundarrajan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195840 Sundarrajan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060212426 Shakara et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218390 Loughran et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060227717 van den Berg et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250965 Irwin Nov 2006 A1
20060268932 Singh et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060280205 Cho Dec 2006 A1
20070002804 Xiong et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070008884 Tang Jan 2007 A1
20070011424 Sharma et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038815 Hughes Feb 2007 A1
20070038816 Hughes et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038858 Hughes Feb 2007 A1
20070050475 Hughes Mar 2007 A1
20070076693 Krishnaswamy Apr 2007 A1
20070081513 Torsner Apr 2007 A1
20070097874 Hughes et al. May 2007 A1
20070110046 Farrell et al. May 2007 A1
20070115812 Hughes May 2007 A1
20070127372 Khan et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070130114 Li et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070140129 Bauer et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150497 De La Cruz et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070174428 Lev Ran et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179900 Daase et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070195702 Yuen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070195789 Yao Aug 2007 A1
20070198523 Hayim Aug 2007 A1
20070226320 Hager et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070237104 Alon et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244987 Pedersen et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245079 Bhattacharjee et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070248084 Whitehead Oct 2007 A1
20070258468 Bennett Nov 2007 A1
20070263554 Finn Nov 2007 A1
20070276983 Zohar et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280245 Rosberg Dec 2007 A1
20080005156 Edwards et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080013532 Garner et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080016301 Chen Jan 2008 A1
20080028467 Kommareddy et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031149 Hughes et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080031240 Hughes Feb 2008 A1
20080071818 Apanowicz et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080095060 Yao Apr 2008 A1
20080133536 Bjorner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080133561 Dubnicki et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080184081 Hama et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080205445 Kumar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080222044 Gottlieb et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080229137 Samuels et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243992 Jardetzky et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267217 Colville et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080300887 Chen et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313318 Vermeulen et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080320151 McCanne et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006801 Shultz Jan 2009 A1
20090024763 Stepin et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037448 Thomas Feb 2009 A1
20090060198 Little Mar 2009 A1
20090063696 Wang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080460 Kronewitter, III et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089048 Pouzin Apr 2009 A1
20090092137 Haigh et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090100483 McDowell Apr 2009 A1
20090158417 Khanna et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175172 Prytz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204961 DeHaan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234966 Samuels et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245114 Vijayaraghavan Oct 2009 A1
20090265707 Goodman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090274294 Itani Nov 2009 A1
20090279550 Romrell et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281984 Black Nov 2009 A1
20100005222 Brant et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011125 Yang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100020693 Thakur Jan 2010 A1
20100054142 Moiso et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070605 Hughes et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100077251 Liu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082545 Bhattacharjee et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100085964 Weir et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100115137 Kim et al. May 2010 A1
20100121957 Roy et al. May 2010 A1
20100124239 Hughes May 2010 A1
20100131957 Kami May 2010 A1
20100169467 Shukla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100177663 Johansson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100225658 Coleman Sep 2010 A1
20100232443 Pandey Sep 2010 A1
20100246584 Ferguson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100290364 Black Nov 2010 A1
20100318892 Teevan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110002346 Wu Jan 2011 A1
20110022812 van der Linden et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110113472 Fung et al. May 2011 A1
20110154169 Gopal et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154329 Arcese et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110181448 Koratagere Jul 2011 A1
20110219181 Hughes et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225322 Demidov et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110261828 Smith Oct 2011 A1
20110276963 Wu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110299537 Saraiya et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120036325 Mashtizadeh et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120069131 Abelow Mar 2012 A1
20120173759 Agarwal et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120218130 Boettcher et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221611 Watanabe et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120230345 Ovsiannikov Sep 2012 A1
20120239872 Hughes et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130018722 Libby Jan 2013 A1
20130018765 Fork et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130031642 Dwivedi et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130044751 Casado et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130058354 Casado et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080619 Assuncao et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086236 Baucke et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130094501 Hughes Apr 2013 A1
20130103655 Fanghaenel et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130121209 Padmanabhan et al. May 2013 A1
20130141259 Hazarika et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130163594 Sharma et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130250951 Koganti Sep 2013 A1
20130263125 Shamsee et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130282970 Hughes et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130343191 Kim et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140052864 Van Der Linden et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140075554 Cooley Mar 2014 A1
20140101426 Senthurpandi Apr 2014 A1
20140108360 Kunath et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140114742 Lamontagne et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140123213 Vank et al. May 2014 A1
20140181381 Hughes et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140269705 DeCusatis et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279078 Nukala et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140379937 Hughes et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150074291 Hughes Mar 2015 A1
20150074361 Hughes et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150078397 Hughes et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150120663 Le Scouarnec et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150170221 Shah Jun 2015 A1
20150281099 Banavalikar Oct 2015 A1
20150281391 Hughes et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150334210 Hughes Nov 2015 A1
20160014051 Hughes et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160034305 Shear et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160218947 Hughes et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160255542 Hughes et al. Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
1507353 Feb 2005 EP
H05-061964 Mar 1993 JP
WO0135226 May 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (139)
Entry
“IPsec Anti-Replay Window: Expanding and Disabling,” Cisco IOS Security Configuration Guide. 2005-2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. Last updated: Sep. 12, 2006, 14pages (Previously cited as: Zhao et al., “Analysis and Improvement on IPSEC Anti-Replay Window Protocol”; 2003; IEEE pp. 553-558).
Singh et al.; “Future of Internet Security—IPSEC”; pp. 1-8.
Muthitacharoen, Athicha et al., “A Low-bandwidth Network File System,” 2001, in Proc. of the 18th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Banff, Canada, pp. 174-187.
“Shared LAN Cache Datasheet”, 1996, http://www.lancache.com/slcdata.htm.
Spring et al., “A protocol-independent technique for eliminating redundant network traffic”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 30, Issue 4 (Oct. 2000) pp. 87-95, Year of Publication: 2000.
Hong, B et al. “Duplicate data elimination in a SAN file system”, In Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Mass Storage Systems (MSS '04), Goddard, MD, Apr. 2004. IEEE.
You, L. L. and Karamanolis, C. 2004. “Evaluation of efficient archival storage techniques”, In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST).
Douglis, F. et al., “Application specific Delta-encoding via Resemblance Detection”, Published in the 2003 USENIX Annual Technical Conference.
You, L. L. et al., “Deep Store an Archival Storage System Architecture” Data Engineering, 2005. ICDE 2005. Proceedings of the 21st. Intl. Conf. on Data Eng., Tokyo, Japan, Apr. 5-8, 2005. pp. 12.
Manber, Udi, “Finding Similar Files in a Large File System”, TR 93-33 Oct. 1994, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona. http://webglimpse.net/pubs/TR93-33.pdf. Also appears in the 1994 winter USENIX Technical Conference.
Knutsson, Bjorn et al., “Transparent Proxy Signalling”, Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 3, No. 2, Jun. 2001.
Definition memory (n), Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged (1993), available at <http://lionreference.chadwyck.com> (Dictionaries/Webster's Dictionary).
Definition appliance, 2c, Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged (1993), available at <http://lionreference.chadwyck.com> (Dictionaries/Webster's Dictionary).
Newton, “Newton's Telecom Dictionary”, 17th Ed., 2001, pp. 38, 201, and 714.
Silver Peak Systems, “The Benefits of Byte-level WAN Deduplication” (2008).
Final Written Decision, Dec. 30, 2014, Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2013-00403.
Final Written Decision, Dec. 30, 2014, Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2013-00402.
“Business Wire, ““Silver Peak Systems Delivers Family of Appliances for Enterprise-Wide Centralization of Branch Office Infrastructure; Innovative Local Instance Networking Approach Overcomes Traditional Application Acceleration Pitfalls”” (available at http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20050919005450/en/Silver-Peak-Systems-Delivers-Family-Appliances-Enterprise-Wide#.UVzkPk7u-1 (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)).”
Riverbed, “Riverbed Introduces Market-Leading WDS Solutions for Disaster Recovery and Business Application Acceleration” (available at http://www.riverbed.com/about/news-articles/pressreleases/riverbed-introduces-market-leading-wds-solutions-fordisaster-recovery-and-business-application-acceleration.html (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)).
Tseng, Josh, “When accelerating secure traffic is not secure” (available at http://www.riverbed.com/blogs/whenaccelerati.html?&isSearch=true&pageSize=3&page=2 (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)).
Riverbed, “The Riverbed Optimization System (RiOS) v4.0: A Technical Overview” (explaining “Data Security” through segmentation) (available at http://mediacms.riverbed.com/documents/TechOverview-Riverbed-RiOS—4—0.pdf (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)).
Riverbed, “Riverbed Awarded Patent on Core WDS Technology” (available at: http://www.riverbed.com/about/news-articles/pressreleases/riverbed-awarded-patent-on-core-wds-technology.html (last visited Aug. 8, 2014)).
Final Written Decision, Jun. 9, 2015, Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-00245.
Allowance, May 10, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Final, Mar. 25, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Request for Trial Granted, Jun. 11, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006.
Allowance, Apr. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008.
Final, Apr. 1, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Advisory, Jun. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Non-Final, Jul. 30, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Non-Final, Sep. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,548, filed Feb. 1, 2013.
Non-Final, Jun. 6, 2014 U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,940, filed Feb. 26, 2014.
Allowance, Sep. 5, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,229, filed Apr. 8, 2014.
Non-Final, Jul. 11, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,188, filed Apr. 8, 2014.
Advisory Action, Mar. 25, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Notice of Allowance, May 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Notice of Allowance, Sep. 12, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/657,733, filed Oct. 22, 2012.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability, Oct. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13,657,733, filed Oct. 22, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action, Oct. 1, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,940, filed Feb. 26, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Mar. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,940, filed Feb. 26, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Jun. 8, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,167, filed Apr. 8, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Oct. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,101, filed May 5, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Jun. 3, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/548,195, filed Nov. 19, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Mar. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/549,425, filed Nov. 20, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Jul. 27, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/549,425, filed Nov. 20, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, May 6, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, May 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015.
Final Office Action, Jul. 14, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321, filed May 29, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action, Jul. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,949, filed Jun. 9, 2015.
Final Office Action, Dec. 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015.
Advisory Action, Nov. 25, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321, filed May 29, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action, Dec. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,131, filed Sep. 5, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Dec. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,179, filed Sep. 18, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action, Jan. 12, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Feb. 8, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,781, filed Nov. 17, 2014.
Final Office Action, Sep. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,841, filed Apr. 2, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,781, filed Nov. 17, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Oct. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,949, filed Jun. 9, 2015.
Corrected Notice of Allowability, Mar. 7, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,781, filed Nov. 17, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Feb. 16, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,167, filed Apr. 8, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Mar. 2, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,841, filed Apr. 2, 2015.
Corrected Notice of Allowability, Mar. 14, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,841, filed Apr. 2, 2015.
Advisory Action, Mar. 21, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action, May 3, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015.
Notice of Allowance, Jun. 3, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/859,179, filed Sep. 18, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action, Jun. 15, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,533, filed Apr. 5, 2016.
Non-Final Office Action, Jun. 22, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,505, filed Jul. 30, 2014.
Final Office Action, Jul. 19, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,131, filed Sep. 5, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Jul. 25, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,619, filed Oct. 30, 2013.
Final Office Action, Jul. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/477,804, filed Sep. 4, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 10, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/148,933, filed May 6, 2016.
Notice of Allowance, Aug. 24, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,965, filed Apr. 6, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action, Aug. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,534, filed Sep. 17, 2012.
Final Office Action, Oct. 4, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,533, filed Apr. 5, 2016.
Non-Final Office Action, Oct. 6, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,131, filed Sep. 5, 2014.
Request for Trial Granted, Jan. 2, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005.
Allowance, Oct. 23, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005.
Decision on Appeal, Sep. 17, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief, Oct. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,697, filed Aug. 12, 2005.
Request for Trial Granted, Jan. 2, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005.
Allowance, Aug. 30, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005.
Decision on Appeal, Jun. 28, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief, Oct. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,110, filed Sep. 29, 2005.
Allowance, Apr. 28, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/357,657, filed Feb. 16, 2006.
Allowance, Sep. 8, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,755, filed Oct. 31, 2005.
Final, May 11, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,755, filed Oct. 31, 2005.
Allowance, Feb. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Non-Final, Jul. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Final, Aug. 12, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Advisory, Oct. 2, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Non-Final, Oct. 9, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Advisory, Jul. 16, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491, filed Aug. 2, 2006.
Allowance, Dec. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006.
Decision on Appeal, Nov. 14, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief, Oct. 14, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006.
Allowance, Dec. 3, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,239, filed Apr. 27, 2007.
Allowance, Jan. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008.
Non-Final, Aug. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008.
Advisory, Jan. 29, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008.
Advisory, Jul. 2, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440, filed Jul. 3, 2008.
Allowance, Feb. 29, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,440, filed Jul. 5, 2007.
Allowance, Nov. 12, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,497, filed Jul. 5, 2007.
Allowance, Feb. 11, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/903,416, filed Sep. 20, 2007.
Allowance, May 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 11/998,726, filed Nov. 30, 2007.
Advisory, May 23, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/998,726, filed Nov. 30, 2007.
Allowance, Mar. 21, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,796, filed Feb. 20, 2008.
Allowance, Mar. 16, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/151,839, filed May 8, 2008.
Final, Jan. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008.
Non-Final, Jul. 1, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008.
Advisory, Aug. 20, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/313,618, filed Nov. 20, 2008.
Allowance, Jan. 20, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,324, filed Nov. 19, 2009.
Allowance, Dec. 9, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,324, filed Nov. 19, 2009.
Allowance, Mar. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/112,936, filed May 20, 2011.
Non-Final, Oct. 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Allowance, Jan. 2, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012.
Advisory, Sep. 27, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012.
Final, Jul. 17, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012.
Advisory, Jan. 24, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422, filed Mar. 22, 2012.
Allowance, Feb. 19, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321, filed May 29, 2012.
Allowance, Sep. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,575, filed Jun. 13, 2012.
Advisory, Apr. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,575, filed Jun. 13, 2012.
Allowance, Jan. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,548, filed Feb. 1, 2013.
Non-Final, Jan. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,548, filed Feb. 1, 2013.
Allowance, Nov. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,517, filed Jun. 13, 2013.
Non-Final, Aug. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,517, filed Jun. 13, 2013.
Office Action, Nov. 20, 2012, filed Jul. 3, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,440.
Office Action, Jan. 3, 2013, filed May 29, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,321.
Office Action, Jan. 11, 2013, filed Jun. 13, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,575.
Office Action, Feb. 1, 2013, filed Feb. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/070,796.
Office Action, Apr. 2, 2013, filed Mar. 22, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,422.
Office Action, Apr. 15, 2013, filed Aug. 2, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,491.
Office Action, Feb. 4, 2013, filed Aug. 2, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,473.
Final Office Action, Jan. 12, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,162, filed Oct. 14, 2011.
Notice of Allowance, Jan. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,188, filed Apr. 8, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Nov. 26, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/333,486, filed Jul. 16, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, Dec. 22, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/333,486, filed Jul. 16, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action, Dec. 31, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,534, filed Sep. 17, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action, Jan. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/548,195, filed Nov. 19, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130117494 A1 May 2013 US