BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The following and other aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which
FIG. 1 shows the effect of combustion gas temperature on NOx reduction with urea or ammonia;
FIG. 2 shows NOx without and with urea injection in the 50 MW Boiler;
FIG. 3 shows NOx reduction with urea injection for various number of injectors and various total urea-water solution flow to said injectors;
FIG. 4 shows the Estimated Gas Cooling from Increasing the Water concentration in the injected urea-water solution vs NOx Reduction in the 50 MW Boiler;
FIG. 5 shows for the 50 MW Power Plant's NOx-level with urea-water solution flow of 19 gpm with five injectors at different urea and solution flow to the injector;
FIG. 6 shows the 50 MW Power Plant's NOx Emissions with less total water-urea solution injection per injector that in FIG. 5
FIG. 7 shows the 50 MW Plant's; NOx Emissions with water-urea injection at three power level and injection flow water that were used to measure ammonia slip;
FIG. 8 shows the 50 MW Plant's SO2 reduction in a Combined Lime/Urea-Water Injection test at low power of 28 MW;
FIG. 9 shows the 50 MW Power Plant-'s NOx emissions for the same test as in FIG. 8.
FIG. 10 shows the SO2 and Power Output-with water only and with a water-limestone mixture in a 50 MW Power Plant Test;
FIG. 11 shows the 50 MW Power Plant-Power Output in two days of load following operation;
FIG. 12 shows the 50 MW Power Plants—Heat Rate over the same period as in FIG. 11;
FIG. 13 shows the 50 MW Coal Power Plant's-SO2 (12 month) & NOx (5 month summer Ozone; Season Emissions annually) from 1997 through 2005
FIG. 14 shows the 50 MW Coal Power Plant's Percentage Change in Annual SO2 and NOx Emissions through 2005 as a percentage change from a 1997 baseline
FIG. 15. shows the 50 MW Coal Power Plant Efficiency decrease from 1997 through 2005.