Implementations of the claimed invention generally may relate to wireless communication, and in particular to security bits in media access control (MAC) headers.
Modern wireless data communication systems such as WiMAX, WiMAX-II, 3GPP LTE may be designed with security features included in their standard communication protocols. An example of this will be presented with regard to
MAC module 110 may generate data units, typically referred to as service data units when communicating with higher layers and protocol data units when communicating with lower layers (e.g., PHY module 120). One exemplary MAC data unit 140 is illustrated in
For security purposes, MAC header 150 typically may contain one encryption (EC) bit and two encryption key sequence (EKS) bits. The EC bit and the EKS bits need not be contiguous as long as they are in known positions in header 150.
Because such thee bits of security information are transmitted for each data unit 140, however, it may contribute to the overhead of STA 100 and a corresponding reduction of bandwidth for any wireless system of which STA 100 is a part.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more implementations consistent with the principles of the invention and, together with the description, explain such implementations. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, the emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings,
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers may be used in different drawings to identify the same or similar elements. In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth such as particular structures, architectures, interfaces, techniques, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various aspects of the claimed invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the present disclosure that the various aspects of the invention claimed may be practiced in other examples that depart from these specific details. In certain instances, descriptions of well known devices, circuits, and methods are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the present invention with unnecessary detail.
To decrease the potential size of MAC header 150, the scheme described herein may encode both 1) the forward state updates of encryption keys and 2) the encrypted state of the packet using only two bits (e.g., the two EKS bits). In such a scheme, the EC bit would not exist in header 150, assisting in an overall header size reduction (e.g., from a 6 byte GMH to 4 bytes). Such a header reduction may reduce overhead bandwidth and improve throughput in a wireless system, while maintaining both the encryption (EC) and encryption key sequence (EKS) functionalities described above.
In the implementation shown in
Other state transitions are also illustrate in
It should be noted that the four states shown are only suggestions. Any other logical convention may be used to assign the one unencrypted state and the three EKS states. In other words, the unencrypted state need not be 00, but may be any of the other three states as long as the remaining states are assigned consistently with the description herein (e.g., as EKS states).
Referring again to
Processing may continue with STA 100 transmitting an unencrypted packet [act 420]. Act 420 corresponds to state transition PT in
Processing may continue with STA 100 transmitting an encrypted packet with a new TEK [act 430]. Act 430 corresponds to state transition NT in
It should be noted that although acts 410-430 are illustrated as happening in a particular order, this is purely for ease of explanation and is not limiting. Any of acts 410-430 may occur after any of the others, or after itself, as illustrated in the various state transition arrows of
In contrast to
Processing may continue with STA 100 receiving an unencrypted packet [act 520]. Act 520 corresponds to state transition PT in
Processing may continue with STA 100 receiving an encrypted packet with a new TEK [act 530]. Act 530 corresponds to state transition NT in
It should be noted that although acts 510-530 are illustrated as happening in a particular order, this is purely for ease of explanation and is not limiting. Any of acts 510-530 may occur after any of the others, or after itself, as illustrated in the various state transition arrows of
Thus the scheme herein merges the indication of two separate things, encryption/non-encryption indication and encryption key sequence, in the MAC header into a pair of bits, saving one bit in a novel way.
The foregoing description of one or more implementations provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of various implementations of the invention. For example, any or all of the acts in
No element, act, or instruction used in the description of the present application should be construed as critical or essential to the invention unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein, the article “a” is intended to include one or more items. Variations and modifications may be made to the above-described implementation(s) of the claimed invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6295604 | Callum | Sep 2001 | B1 |
7876897 | Yi | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20040028231 | Sako | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050114489 | Yonge, III | May 2005 | A1 |
20070162610 | Un | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177627 | Raju | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080168722 | Hendricks | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175265 | Yonge | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080317033 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090069024 | Lee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090168722 | Saifullah et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090220085 | Tao | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090310533 | Zheng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316806 | Cheng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100208655 | Kim | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20040034572 | Apr 2004 | KR |
10-0740863 | Jul 2007 | KR |
20080112758 | Dec 2008 | KR |
2010078172 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010078172 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sang et al., “An Efficient Bandwidth Request Mechanism for Non-Real-Time Services in IEEE 802.16 Systems,” Communication Systems Software and Middleware, 2007. COMSWARE 2007. 2nd International Conference on Year: 2007 pp. 1-9. |
Rawat et al., “Optimising the Use of Robust Header Compression Profiles in NEMO Networks,” Networking, 2008. ICN 2008. Seventh International Conference on Year: 2008 pp. 150-155. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/069301, mailed on Jul. 30, 2010, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/069301, mailed on Jul. 14, 2011, 7 pages. |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 2011-7015176, mailed on Nov. 19, 2012, 4 pages English translation. |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980153570.1, mailed Jun. 5, 2013, 18 pages including 11 pages English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100166183 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |