This invention relates to computer networks and, more particularly, to computing data storage systems.
As computer memory storage and data bandwidth increase, so does the amount and complexity of data that businesses manage. Large-scale distributed storage systems, such as data centers, typically run many business operations. A distributed storage system may be coupled to a number of client computers interconnected by one or more networks. If any portion of the distributed storage system has poor performance or becomes unavailable, company operations may be impaired or stopped completely. Such distributed storage systems seek to maintain high standards for data availability and high-performance functionality.
Within storage systems themselves, file system and storage device-level input/output (I/O) schedulers generally determine an order for read and write operations in addition to providing steps for how the operations are to be executed. For example, non-sequential read and write operations may be more expensive to execute for a storage device (e.g., in terms of time and/or resources) than sequential read and write operations. Therefore, I/O schedulers may attempt to reduce non-sequential operations. In addition, I/O schedulers may provide other functions such as starvation prevention, request merging, and inter-process fairness.
At least the read and write response times may substantially differ between storage devices. Such differences may be characteristic of the technology itself. Consequently, the technology and mechanisms associated with chosen data storage devices may determine the methods used to perform effective I/O scheduling. For example, many current algorithms were developed for systems utilizing hard disk drives (HDDs). HDDs comprise one or more rotating disks, each coated with a magnetic medium. These disks rotate at a rate of several thousand rotations per minute. In addition, an electro-magnetic actuator is responsible for positioning magnetic read/write devices over the rotating disks. The mechanical and electro-mechanical design of the device affects its I/O characteristics. Unfortunately, friction, wear, vibrations and mechanical misalignments may create reliability issues as well as affect the I/O characteristics of the HDD. Many current I/O schedulers are designed to take account for the input/output (I/O) characteristics of HDDs.
One example of another type of storage medium is a Solid-State Drive (SSD). In contrast to HDDs, SSDs utilize solid-state memory to store persistent data rather than magnetic media devices. The solid-state memory may comprise Flash memory cells. Flash memory has a number of features, which differ from that of hard drives. For example, Flash memory cells are generally erased in large blocks before being rewritten or reprogrammed. Flash memory is also generally organized in complex arrangements, such as dies, packages, planes and blocks. The size and parallelism of a chosen arrangement, the wear of the Flash memory over time, and the interconnect and transfer speeds of the device(s) all may vary. Additionally, such devices may also include a flash translation layer (FTL) to manage storage on the device. The algorithms utilized by the FTL can vary and may also contribute to variations in the behavior and/or performance of the device. Consequently, high performance and predictable latencies may not generally be achieved in systems using flash based SSDs for storage while utilizing I/O schedulers designed for systems such as hard drives which have different characteristics.
In view of the above, systems and methods for effectively scheduling read and write operations among a plurality of storage devices are desired.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments are shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It is to be understood, however, that drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, one having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention might be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known circuits, structures, signals, computer program instruction, and techniques have not been shown in detail to avoid obscuring the present invention.
Example methods, apparatus, and products for optimizing storage device access based on latency in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, beginning with
System 100 includes a number of computing devices 164A-B. Computing devices (also referred to as “client devices” herein) may be embodied, for example, a server in a data center, a workstation, a personal computer, a notebook, or the like. Computing devices 164A-B may be coupled for data communications to one or more storage arrays 102A-B through a storage area network (‘SAN’) 158 or a local area network (‘LAN’) 160.
The SAN 158 may be implemented with a variety of data communications fabrics, devices, and protocols. For example, the fabrics for SAN 158 may include Fibre Channel, Ethernet, Infiniband, Serial Attached Small Computer System Interface (‘SAS’), or the like. Data communications protocols for use with SAN 158 may include Advanced Technology Attachment (‘ATA’), Fibre Channel Protocol, Small Computer System Interface (‘SCSI’), Internet Small Computer System Interface (‘iSCSI’), HyperSCSI, Non-Volatile Memory Express (‘NVMe’) over Fabrics, or the like. It may be noted that SAN 158 is provided for illustration, rather than limitation. Other data communication couplings may be implemented between computing devices 164A-B and storage arrays 102A-B.
The LAN 160 may also be implemented with a variety of fabrics, devices, and protocols. For example, the fabrics for LAN 160 may include Ethernet (802.3), wireless (802.11), or the like. Data communication protocols for use in LAN 160 may include Transmission Control Protocol (‘TCP’), User Datagram Protocol (‘UDP’), Internet Protocol (‘IP’), HyperText Transfer Protocol (‘HTTP’), Wireless Access Protocol (‘WAP’), Handheld Device Transport Protocol (‘HDTP’), Session Initiation Protocol (‘SIP’), Real Time Protocol (‘RTP’), or the like.
Storage arrays 102A-B may provide persistent data storage for the computing devices 164A-B. Storage array 102A may be contained in a chassis (not shown), and storage array 102B may be contained in another chassis (not shown), in implementations. Storage array 102A and 102B may include one or more storage array controllers 110A-D (also referred to as “controller” herein). A storage array controller 110A-D may be embodied as a module of automated computing machinery comprising computer hardware, computer software, or a combination of computer hardware and software. In some implementations, the storage array controllers 110A-D may be configured to carry out various storage tasks. Storage tasks may include writing data received from the computing devices 164A-B to storage array 102A-B, erasing data from storage array 102A-B, retrieving data from storage array 102A-B and providing data to computing devices 164A-B, monitoring and reporting of disk utilization and performance, performing redundancy operations, such as Redundant Array of Independent Drives (‘RAID’) or RAID-like data redundancy operations, compressing data, encrypting data, and so forth.
Storage array controller 110A-D may be implemented in a variety of ways, including as a Field Programmable Gate Array (‘FPGA’), a Programmable Logic Chip (‘PLC’), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (‘ASIC’), System-on-Chip (‘ SOC’), or any computing device that includes discrete components such as a processing device, central processing unit, computer memory, or various adapters. Storage array controller 110A-D may include, for example, a data communications adapter configured to support communications via the SAN 158 or LAN 160. In some implementations, storage array controller 110A-D may be independently coupled to the LAN 160. In implementations, storage array controller 110A-D may include an I/O controller or the like that couples the storage array controller 110A-D for data communications, through a midplane (not shown), to a persistent storage resource 170A-B (also referred to as a “storage resource” herein). The persistent storage resource 170A-B main include any number of storage drives 171A-F (also referred to as “storage devices” herein) and any number of non-volatile Random Access Memory (‘NVRAM’) devices (not shown).
In some implementations, the NVRAM devices of a persistent storage resource 170A-B may be configured to receive, from the storage array controller 110A-D, data to be stored in the storage drives 171A-F. In some examples, the data may originate from computing devices 164A-B. In some examples, writing data to the NVRAM device may be carried out more quickly than directly writing data to the storage drive 171A-F. In implementations, the storage array controller 110A-D may be configured to utilize the NVRAM devices as a quickly accessible buffer for data destined to be written to the storage drives 171A-F. Latency for write requests using NVRAM devices as a buffer may be improved relative to a system in which a storage array controller 110A-D writes data directly to the storage drives 171A-F. In some implementations, the NVRAM devices may be implemented with computer memory in the form of high bandwidth, low latency RAM. The NVRAM device is referred to as “non-volatile” because the NVRAM device may receive or include a unique power source that maintains the state of the RAM after main power loss to the NVRAM device. Such a power source may be a battery, one or more capacitors, or the like. In response to a power loss, the NVRAM device may be configured to write the contents of the RAM to a persistent storage, such as the storage drives 171A-F.
In implementations, storage drive 171A-F may refer to any device configured to record data persistently, where “persistently” or “persistent” refers as to a device's ability to maintain recorded data after loss of power. In some implementations, storage drive 171A-F may correspond to non-disk storage media. For example, the storage drive 171A-F may be one or more solid-state drives (‘SSDs’), flash memory based storage, any type of solid-state non-volatile memory, or any other type of non-mechanical storage device. In other implementations, storage drive 171A-F may include mechanical or spinning hard disk, such as hard-disk drives
In some implementations, the storage array controllers 110A-D may be configured for offloading device management responsibilities from storage drive 171A-F in storage array 102A-B. For example, storage array controllers 110A-D may manage control information that may describe the state of one or more memory blocks in the storage drives 171A-F. The control information may indicate, for example, that a particular memory block has failed and should no longer be written to, that a particular memory block contains boot code for a storage array controller 110A-D, the number of program-erase (‘P/E’) cycles that have been performed on a particular memory block, the age of data stored in a particular memory block, the type of data that is stored in a particular memory block, and so forth. In some implementations, the control information may be stored with an associated memory block as metadata. In other implementations, the control information for the storage drives 171A-F may be stored in one or more particular memory blocks of the storage drives 171A-F that are selected by the storage array controller 110A-D. The selected memory blocks may be tagged with an identifier indicating that the selected memory block contains control information. The identifier may be utilized by the storage array controllers 110A-D in conjunction with storage drives 171A-F to quickly identify the memory blocks that contain control information. For example, the storage controllers 110A-D may issue a command to locate memory blocks that contain control information. It may be noted that control information may be so large that parts of the control information may be stored in multiple locations, that the control information may be stored in multiple locations for purposes of redundancy, for example, or that the control information may otherwise be distributed across multiple memory blocks in the storage drive 171A-F.
In implementations, storage array controllers 110A-D may offload device management responsibilities from storage drives 171A-F of storage array 102A-B by retrieving, from the storage drives 171A-F, control information describing the state of one or more memory blocks in the storage drives 171A-F. Retrieving the control information from the storage drives 171A-F may be carried out, for example, by the storage array controller 110A-D querying the storage drives 171A-F for the location of control information for a particular storage drive 171A-F. The storage drives 171A-F may be configured to execute instructions that enable the storage drive 171A-F to identify the location of the control information. The instructions may be executed by a controller (not shown) associated with or otherwise located on the storage drive 171A-F and may cause the storage drive 171A-F to scan a portion of each memory block to identify the memory blocks that store control information for the storage drives 171A-F. The storage drives 171A-F may respond by sending a response message to the storage array controller 110A-D that includes the location of control information for the storage drive 171A-F. Responsive to receiving the response message, storage array controllers 110A-D may issue a request to read data stored at the address associated with the location of control information for the storage drives 171A-F.
In other implementations, the storage array controllers 110A-D may further offload device management responsibilities from storage drives 171A-F by performing, in response to receiving the control information, a storage drive management operation. A storage drive management operation may include, for example, an operation that is typically performed by the storage drive 171A-F (e.g., the controller (not shown) associated with a particular storage drive 171A-F). A storage drive management operation may include, for example, ensuring that data is not written to failed memory blocks within the storage drive 171A-F, ensuring that data is written to memory blocks within the storage drive 171A-F in such a way that adequate wear leveling is achieved, and so forth.
In implementations, storage array 102A-B may implement two or more storage array controllers 110A-D. For example, storage array 102A may include storage array controllers 110A and storage array controllers 110B. At a given instance, a single storage array controller 110A-D (e.g., storage array controller 110A) of a storage system 100 may be designated with primary status (also referred to as “primary controller” herein), and other storage array controllers 110A-D (e.g., storage array controller 110A) may be designated with secondary status (also referred to as “secondary controller” herein). The primary controller may have particular rights, such as permission to alter data in persistent storage resource 170A-B (e.g., writing data to persistent storage resource 170A-B). At least some of the rights of the primary controller may supersede the rights of the secondary controller. For instance, the secondary controller may not have permission to alter data in persistent storage resource 170A-B when the primary controller has the right. The status of storage array controllers 110A-D may change. For example, storage array controller 110A may be designated with secondary status, and storage array controller 110B may be designated with primary status.
In some implementations, a primary controller, such as storage array controller 110A, may serve as the primary controller for one or more storage arrays 102A-B, and a second controller, such as storage array controller 110B, may serve as the secondary controller for the one or more storage arrays 102A-B. For example, storage array controller 110A may be the primary controller for storage array 102A and storage array 102B, and storage array controller 110B may be the secondary controller for storage array 102A and 102B. In some implementations, storage array controllers 110C and 110D (also referred to as “storage processing modules”) may neither have primary or secondary status. Storage array controllers 110C and 110D, implemented as storage processing modules, may act as a communication interface between the primary and secondary controllers (e.g., storage array controllers 110A and 110B, respectively) and storage array 102B. For example, storage array controller 110A of storage array 102A may send a write request, via SAN 158, to storage array 102B. The write request may be received by both storage array controllers 110C and 110D of storage array 102B. Storage array controllers 110C and 110D facilitate the communication, e.g., send the write request to the appropriate storage drive 171A-F. It may be noted that in some implementations storage processing modules may be used to increase the number of storage drives controlled by the primary and secondary controllers.
In implementations, storage array controllers 110A-D are communicatively coupled, via a midplane (not shown), to one or more storage drives 171A-F and to one or more NVRAM devices (not shown) that are included as part of a storage array 102A-B. The storage array controllers 110A-D may be coupled to the midplane via one or more data communication links and the midplane may be coupled to the storage drives 171A-F and the NVRAM devices via one or more data communications links. The data communications links described herein are collectively illustrated by data communications links 108A-D and may include a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (‘PCIe’) bus, for example.
Storage array controller 101 may include one or more processing devices 104 and random access memory (‘RAM’) 111. Processing device 104 (or controller 101) represents one or more general-purpose processing devices such as a microprocessor, central processing unit, or the like. More particularly, the processing device 104 (or controller 101) may be a complex instruction set computing (‘CISC’) microprocessor, reduced instruction set computing (‘RISC’) microprocessor, very long instruction word (‘VLIW’) microprocessor, or a processor implementing other instruction sets or processors implementing a combination of instruction sets. The processing device 104 (or controller 101) may also be one or more special-purpose processing devices such as an ASIC, an FPGA, a digital signal processor (‘DSP’), network processor, or the like.
The processing device 104 may be connected to the RAM 111 via a data communications link 106, which may be embodied as a high speed memory bus such as a Double-Data Rate 4 (‘DDR4’) bus. Stored in RAM 111 is an operating system 112. In some implementations, instructions 113 are stored in RAM 111. Instructions 113 may include computer program instructions for performing operations in in a direct-mapped flash storage system. In one embodiment, a direct-mapped flash storage system is one that that addresses data blocks within flash drives directly and without an address translation performed by the storage controllers of the flash drives.
In implementations, storage array controller 101 includes one or more host bus adapters 103A-C that are coupled to the processing device 104 via a data communications link 105A-C. In implementations, host bus adapters 103A-C may be computer hardware that connects a host system (e.g., the storage array controller) to other network and storage arrays. In some examples, host bus adapters 103A-C may be a Fibre Channel adapter that enables the storage array controller 101 to connect to a SAN, an Ethernet adapter that enables the storage array controller 101 to connect to a LAN, or the like. Host bus adapters 103A-C may be coupled to the processing device 104 via a data communications link 105A-C such as, for example, a PCIe bus.
In implementations, storage array controller 101 may include a host bus adapter 114 that is coupled to an expander 115. The expander 115 may be used to attach a host system to a larger number of storage drives. The expander 115 may, for example, be a SAS expander utilized to enable the host bus adapter 114 to attach to storage drives in an implementation where the host bus adapter 114 is embodied as a SAS controller.
In implementations, storage array controller 101 may include a switch 116 coupled to the processing device 104 via a data communications link 109. The switch 116 may be a computer hardware device that can create multiple endpoints out of a single endpoint, thereby enabling multiple devices to share a single endpoint. The switch 116 may, for example, be a PCIe switch that is coupled to a PCIe bus (e.g., data communications link 109) and presents multiple PCIe connection points to the midplane.
In implementations, storage array controller 101 includes a data communications link 107 for coupling the storage array controller 101 to other storage array controllers. In some examples, data communications link 107 may be a QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) interconnect.
A traditional storage system that uses traditional flash drives may implement a process across the flash drives that are part of the traditional storage system. For example, a higher level process of the storage system may initiate and control a process across the flash drives. However, a flash drive of the traditional storage system may include its own storage controller that also performs the process. Thus, for the traditional storage system, a higher level process (e.g., initiated by the storage system) and a lower level process (e.g., initiated by a storage controller of the storage system) may both be performed.
To resolve various deficiencies of a traditional storage system, operations may be performed by higher level processes and not by the lower level processes. For example, the flash storage system may include flash drives that do not include storage controllers that provide the process. Thus, the operating system of the flash storage system itself may initiate and control the process. This may be accomplished by a direct-mapped flash storage system that addresses data blocks within the flash drives directly and without an address translation performed by the storage controllers of the flash drives.
In implementations, storage drive 171A-F may be one or more zoned storage devices. In some implementations, the one or more zoned storage devices may be a shingled HDD. In implementations, the one or more storage devices may be a flash-based SSD. In a zoned storage device, a zoned namespace on the zoned storage device can be addressed by groups of blocks that are grouped and aligned by a natural size, forming a number of addressable zones. In implementations utilizing an SSD, the natural size may be based on the erase block size of the SSD.
The mapping from a zone to an erase block (or to a shingled track in an HDD) may be arbitrary, dynamic, and hidden from view. The process of opening a zone may be an operation that allows a new zone to be dynamically mapped to underlying storage of the zoned storage device, and then allows data to be written through appending writes into the zone until the zone reaches capacity. The zone can be finished at any point, after which further data may not be written into the zone. When the data stored at the zone is no longer needed, the zone can be reset which effectively deletes the zone's content from the zoned storage device, making the physical storage held by that zone available for the subsequent storage of data. Once a zone has been written and finished, the zoned storage device ensures that the data stored at the zone is not lost until the zone is reset. In the time between writing the data to the zone and the resetting of the zone, the zone may be moved around between shingle tracks or erase blocks as part of maintenance operations within the zoned storage device, such as by copying data to keep the data refreshed or to handle memory cell aging in an SSD.
In implementations utilizing an HDD, the resetting of the zone may allow the shingle tracks to be allocated to a new, opened zone that may be opened at some point in the future. In implementations utilizing an SSD, the resetting of the zone may cause the associated physical erase block(s) of the zone to be erased and subsequently reused for the storage of data. In some implementations, the zoned storage device may have a limit on the number of open zones at a point in time to reduce the amount of overhead dedicated to keeping zones open.
The operating system of the flash storage system may identify and maintain a list of allocation units across multiple flash drives of the flash storage system. The allocation units may be entire erase blocks or multiple erase blocks. The operating system may maintain a map or address range that directly maps addresses to erase blocks of the flash drives of the flash storage system.
Direct mapping to the erase blocks of the flash drives may be used to rewrite data and erase data. For example, the operations may be performed on one or more allocation units that include a first data and a second data where the first data is to be retained and the second data is no longer being used by the flash storage system. The operating system may initiate the process to write the first data to new locations within other allocation units and erasing the second data and marking the allocation units as being available for use for subsequent data. Thus, the process may only be performed by the higher level operating system of the flash storage system without an additional lower level process being performed by controllers of the flash drives.
Advantages of the process being performed only by the operating system of the flash storage system include increased reliability of the flash drives of the flash storage system as unnecessary or redundant write operations are not being performed during the process. One possible point of novelty here is the concept of initiating and controlling the process at the operating system of the flash storage system. In addition, the process can be controlled by the operating system across multiple flash drives. This is contrast to the process being performed by a storage controller of a flash drive.
A storage system can consist of two storage array controllers that share a set of drives for failover purposes, or it could consist of a single storage array controller that provides a storage service that utilizes multiple drives, or it could consist of a distributed network of storage array controllers each with some number of drives or some amount of Flash storage where the storage array controllers in the network collaborate to provide a complete storage service and collaborate on various aspects of a storage service including storage allocation and garbage collection.
In one embodiment, system 117 includes a dual Peripheral Component Interconnect (‘PCI’) flash storage device 118 with separately addressable fast write storage. System 117 may include a storage controller 119. In one embodiment, storage controller 119A-D may be a CPU, ASIC, FPGA, or any other circuitry that may implement control structures necessary according to the present disclosure. In one embodiment, system 117 includes flash memory devices (e.g., including flash memory devices 120a-n), operatively coupled to various channels of the storage device controller 119. Flash memory devices 120a-n, may be presented to the controller 119A-D as an addressable collection of Flash pages, erase blocks, and/or control elements sufficient to allow the storage device controller 119A-D to program and retrieve various aspects of the Flash. In one embodiment, storage device controller 119A-D may perform operations on flash memory devices 120a-n including storing and retrieving data content of pages, arranging and erasing any blocks, tracking statistics related to the use and reuse of Flash memory pages, erase blocks, and cells, tracking and predicting error codes and faults within the Flash memory, controlling voltage levels associated with programming and retrieving contents of Flash cells, etc.
In one embodiment, system 117 may include RAM 121 to store separately addressable fast-write data. In one embodiment, RAM 121 may be one or more separate discrete devices. In another embodiment, RAM 121 may be integrated into storage device controller 119A-D or multiple storage device controllers. The RAM 121 may be utilized for other purposes as well, such as temporary program memory for a processing device (e.g., a CPU) in the storage device controller 119.
In one embodiment, system 117 may include a stored energy device 122, such as a rechargeable battery or a capacitor. Stored energy device 122 may store energy sufficient to power the storage device controller 119, some amount of the RAM (e.g., RAM 121), and some amount of Flash memory (e.g., Flash memory 120a-120n) for sufficient time to write the contents of RAM to Flash memory. In one embodiment, storage device controller 119A-D may write the contents of RAM to Flash Memory if the storage device controller detects loss of external power.
In one embodiment, system 117 includes two data communications links 123a, 123b. In one embodiment, data communications links 123a, 123b may be PCI interfaces. In another embodiment, data communications links 123a, 123b may be based on other communications standards (e.g., HyperTransport, InfiniBand, etc.). Data communications links 123a, 123b may be based on non-volatile memory express (‘NVMe’) or NVMe over fabrics (‘NVMf’) specifications that allow external connection to the storage device controller 119A-D from other components in the storage system 117. It should be noted that data communications links may be interchangeably referred to herein as PCI buses for convenience.
System 117 may also include an external power source (not shown), which may be provided over one or both data communications links 123a, 123b, or which may be provided separately. An alternative embodiment includes a separate Flash memory (not shown) dedicated for use in storing the content of RAM 121. The storage device controller 119A-D may present a logical device over a PCI bus which may include an addressable fast-write logical device, or a distinct part of the logical address space of the storage device 118, which may be presented as PCI memory or as persistent storage. In one embodiment, operations to store into the device are directed into the RAM 121. On power failure, the storage device controller 119A-D may write stored content associated with the addressable fast-write logical storage to Flash memory (e.g., Flash memory 120a-n) for long-term persistent storage.
In one embodiment, the logical device may include some presentation of some or all of the content of the Flash memory devices 120a-n, where that presentation allows a storage system including a storage device 118 (e.g., storage system 117) to directly address Flash memory pages and directly reprogram erase blocks from storage system components that are external to the storage device through the PCI bus. The presentation may also allow one or more of the external components to control and retrieve other aspects of the Flash memory including some or all of: tracking statistics related to use and reuse of Flash memory pages, erase blocks, and cells across all the Flash memory devices; tracking and predicting error codes and faults within and across the Flash memory devices; controlling voltage levels associated with programming and retrieving contents of Flash cells; etc.
In one embodiment, the stored energy device 122 may be sufficient to ensure completion of in-progress operations to the Flash memory devices 120a-120n stored energy device 122 may power storage device controller 119A-D and associated Flash memory devices (e.g., 120a-n) for those operations, as well as for the storing of fast-write RAM to Flash memory. Stored energy device 122 may be used to store accumulated statistics and other parameters kept and tracked by the Flash memory devices 120a-n and/or the storage device controller 119. Separate capacitors or stored energy devices (such as smaller capacitors near or embedded within the Flash memory devices themselves) may be used for some or all of the operations described herein.
Various schemes may be used to track and optimize the life span of the stored energy component, such as adjusting voltage levels over time, partially discharging the storage energy device 122 to measure corresponding discharge characteristics, etc. If the available energy decreases over time, the effective available capacity of the addressable fast-write storage may be decreased to ensure that it can be written safely based on the currently available stored energy.
In one embodiment, two storage controllers (e.g., 125a and 125b) provide storage services, such as a SCS) block storage array, a file server, an object server, a database or data analytics service, etc. The storage controllers 125a, 125b may provide services through some number of network interfaces (e.g., 126a-d) to host computers 127a-n outside of the storage system 124. Storage controllers 125a, 125b may provide integrated services or an application entirely within the storage system 124, forming a converged storage and compute system. The storage controllers 125a, 125b may utilize the fast write memory within or across storage devices 119a-d to journal in progress operations to ensure the operations are not lost on a power failure, storage controller removal, storage controller or storage system shutdown, or some fault of one or more software or hardware components within the storage system 124.
In one embodiment, controllers 125a, 125b operate as PCI masters to one or the other PCI buses 128a, 128b. In another embodiment, 128a and 128b may be based on other communications standards (e.g., HyperTransport, InfiniBand, etc.). Other storage system embodiments may operate storage controllers 125a, 125b as multi-masters for both PCI buses 128a, 128b. Alternately, a PCI/NVMe/NVMf switching infrastructure or fabric may connect multiple storage controllers. Some storage system embodiments may allow storage devices to communicate with each other directly rather than communicating only with storage controllers. In one embodiment, a storage device controller 119a may be operable under direction from a storage controller 125a to synthesize and transfer data to be stored into Flash memory devices from data that has been stored in RAM (e.g., RAM 121 of
In one embodiment, under direction from a storage controller 125a, 125b, a storage device controller 119a, 119b may be operable to calculate and transfer data to other storage devices from data stored in RAM (e.g., RAM 121 of
A storage device controller 119A-D may include mechanisms for implementing high availability primitives for use by other parts of a storage system external to the Dual PCI storage device 118. For example, reservation or exclusion primitives may be provided so that, in a storage system with two storage controllers providing a highly available storage service, one storage controller may prevent the other storage controller from accessing or continuing to access the storage device. This could be used, for example, in cases where one controller detects that the other controller is not functioning properly or where the interconnect between the two storage controllers may itself not be functioning properly.
In one embodiment, a storage system for use with Dual PCI direct mapped storage devices with separately addressable fast write storage includes systems that manage erase blocks or groups of erase blocks as allocation units for storing data on behalf of the storage service, or for storing metadata (e.g., indexes, logs, etc.) associated with the storage service, or for proper management of the storage system itself. Flash pages, which may be a few kilobytes in size, may be written as data arrives or as the storage system is to persist data for long intervals of time (e.g., above a defined threshold of time). To commit data more quickly, or to reduce the number of writes to the Flash memory devices, the storage controllers may first write data into the separately addressable fast write storage on one more storage devices.
In one embodiment, the storage controllers 125a, 125b may initiate the use of erase blocks within and across storage devices (e.g., 118) in accordance with an age and expected remaining lifespan of the storage devices, or based on other statistics. The storage controllers 125a, 125b may initiate garbage collection and data migration data between storage devices in accordance with pages that are no longer needed as well as to manage Flash page and erase block lifespans and to manage overall system performance.
In one embodiment, the storage system 124 may utilize mirroring and/or erasure coding schemes as part of storing data into addressable fast write storage and/or as part of writing data into allocation units associated with erase blocks. Erasure codes may be used across storage devices, as well as within erase blocks or allocation units, or within and across Flash memory devices on a single storage device, to provide redundancy against single or multiple storage device failures or to protect against internal corruptions of Flash memory pages resulting from Flash memory operations or from degradation of Flash memory cells. Mirroring and erasure coding at various levels may be used to recover from multiple types of failures that occur separately or in combination.
The embodiments depicted with reference to
The storage cluster may be contained within a chassis, i.e., an enclosure housing one or more storage nodes. A mechanism to provide power to each storage node, such as a power distribution bus, and a communication mechanism, such as a communication bus that enables communication between the storage nodes are included within the chassis. The storage cluster can run as an independent system in one location according to some embodiments. In one embodiment, a chassis contains at least two instances of both the power distribution and the communication bus which may be enabled or disabled independently. The internal communication bus may be an Ethernet bus, however, other technologies such as PCIe, InfiniBand, and others, are equally suitable. The chassis provides a port for an external communication bus for enabling communication between multiple chassis, directly or through a switch, and with client systems. The external communication may use a technology such as Ethernet, InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, etc. In some embodiments, the external communication bus uses different communication bus technologies for inter-chassis and client communication. If a switch is deployed within or between chassis, the switch may act as a translation between multiple protocols or technologies. When multiple chassis are connected to define a storage cluster, the storage cluster may be accessed by a client using either proprietary interfaces or standard interfaces such as network file system (‘NFS’), common internet file system (‘CIFS’), small computer system interface (‘SCSI’) or hypertext transfer protocol (‘HTTP’). Translation from the client protocol may occur at the switch, chassis external communication bus or within each storage node. In some embodiments, multiple chassis may be coupled or connected to each other through an aggregator switch. A portion and/or all of the coupled or connected chassis may be designated as a storage cluster. As discussed above, each chassis can have multiple blades, each blade has a media access control (‘MAC’) address, but the storage cluster is presented to an external network as having a single cluster IP address and a single MAC address in some embodiments.
Each storage node may be one or more storage servers and each storage server is connected to one or more non-volatile solid state memory units, which may be referred to as storage units or storage devices. One embodiment includes a single storage server in each storage node and between one to eight non-volatile solid state memory units, however this one example is not meant to be limiting. The storage server may include a processor, DRAM and interfaces for the internal communication bus and power distribution for each of the power buses. Inside the storage node, the interfaces and storage unit share a communication bus, e.g., PCI Express, in some embodiments. The non-volatile solid state memory units may directly access the internal communication bus interface through a storage node communication bus, or request the storage node to access the bus interface. The non-volatile solid state memory unit contains an embedded CPU, solid state storage controller, and a quantity of solid state mass storage, e.g., between 2-32 terabytes (‘TB’) in some embodiments. An embedded volatile storage medium, such as DRAM, and an energy reserve apparatus are included in the non-volatile solid state memory unit. In some embodiments, the energy reserve apparatus is a capacitor, super-capacitor, or battery that enables transferring a subset of DRAM contents to a stable storage medium in the case of power loss. In some embodiments, the non-volatile solid state memory unit is constructed with a storage class memory, such as phase change or magnetoresistive random access memory (‘M’) that substitutes for DRAM and enables a reduced power hold-up apparatus.
One of many features of the storage nodes and non-volatile solid state storage is the ability to proactively rebuild data in a storage cluster. The storage nodes and non-volatile solid state storage can determine when a storage node or non-volatile solid state storage in the storage cluster is unreachable, independent of whether there is an attempt to read data involving that storage node or non-volatile solid state storage. The storage nodes and non-volatile solid state storage then cooperate to recover and rebuild the data in at least partially new locations. This constitutes a proactive rebuild, in that the system rebuilds data without waiting until the data is needed for a read access initiated from a client system employing the storage cluster. These and further details of the storage memory and operation thereof are discussed below.
Each storage node 150 can have multiple components. In the embodiment shown here, the storage node 150 includes a printed circuit board 159 populated by a CPU 156, i.e., processor, a memory 154 coupled to the CPU 156, and a non-volatile solid state storage 152 coupled to the CPU 156, although other mountings and/or components could be used in further embodiments. The memory 154 has instructions which are executed by the CPU 156 and/or data operated on by the CPU 156. As further explained below, the non-volatile solid state storage 152 includes flash or, in further embodiments, other types of solid-state memory.
Referring to
Every piece of data, and every piece of metadata, has redundancy in the system in some embodiments. In addition, every piece of data and every piece of metadata has an owner, which may be referred to as an authority. If that authority is unreachable, for example through failure of a storage node, there is a plan of succession for how to find that data or that metadata. In various embodiments, there are redundant copies of authorities 168. Authorities 168 have a relationship to storage nodes 150 and non-volatile solid state storage 152 in some embodiments. Each authority 168, covering a range of data segment numbers or other identifiers of the data, may be assigned to a specific non-volatile solid state storage 152. In some embodiments the authorities 168 for all of such ranges are distributed over the non-volatile solid state storages 152 of a storage cluster. Each storage node 150 has a network port that provides access to the non-volatile solid state storage(s) 152 of that storage node 150. Data can be stored in a segment, which is associated with a segment number and that segment number is an indirection for a configuration of a RAID (redundant array of independent disks) stripe in some embodiments. The assignment and use of the authorities 168 thus establishes an indirection to data. Indirection may be referred to as the ability to reference data indirectly, in this case via an authority 168, in accordance with some embodiments. A segment identifies a set of non-volatile solid state storage 152 and a local identifier into the set of non-volatile solid state storage 152 that may contain data. In some embodiments, the local identifier is an offset into the device and may be reused sequentially by multiple segments. In other embodiments the local identifier is unique for a specific segment and never reused. The offsets in the non-volatile solid state storage 152 are applied to locating data for writing to or reading from the non-volatile solid state storage 152 (in the form of a RAID stripe). Data is striped across multiple units of non-volatile solid state storage 152, which may include or be different from the non-volatile solid state storage 152 having the authority 168 for a particular data segment.
If there is a change in where a particular segment of data is located, e.g., during a data move or a data reconstruction, the authority 168 for that data segment should be consulted, at that non-volatile solid state storage 152 or storage node 150 having that authority 168. In order to locate a particular piece of data, embodiments calculate a hash value for a data segment or apply an inode number or a data segment number. The output of this operation points to a non-volatile solid state storage 152 having the authority 168 for that particular piece of data. In some embodiments there are two stages to this operation. The first stage maps an entity identifier (ID), e.g., a segment number, inode number, or directory number to an authority identifier. This mapping may include a calculation such as a hash or a bit mask. The second stage is mapping the authority identifier to a particular non-volatile solid state storage 152, which may be done through an explicit mapping. The operation is repeatable, so that when the calculation is performed, the result of the calculation repeatably and reliably points to a particular non-volatile solid state storage 152 having that authority 168. The operation may include the set of reachable storage nodes as input. If the set of reachable non-volatile solid state storage units changes the optimal set changes. In some embodiments, the persisted value is the current assignment (which is always true) and the calculated value is the target assignment the cluster will attempt to reconfigure towards. This calculation may be used to determine the optimal non-volatile solid state storage 152 for an authority in the presence of a set of non-volatile solid state storage 152 that are reachable and constitute the same cluster. The calculation also determines an ordered set of peer non-volatile solid state storage 152 that will also record the authority to non-volatile solid state storage mapping so that the authority may be determined even if the assigned non-volatile solid state storage is unreachable. A duplicate or substitute authority 168 may be consulted if a specific authority 168 is unavailable in some embodiments.
With reference to
In embodiments, authorities 168 operate to determine how operations will proceed against particular logical elements. Each of the logical elements may be operated on through a particular authority across a plurality of storage controllers of a storage system. The authorities 168 may communicate with the plurality of storage controllers so that the plurality of storage controllers collectively perform operations against those particular logical elements.
In embodiments, logical elements could be, for example, files, directories, object buckets, individual objects, delineated parts of files or objects, other forms of key-value pair databases, or tables. In embodiments, performing an operation can involve, for example, ensuring consistency, structural integrity, and/or recoverability with other operations against the same logical element, reading metadata and data associated with that logical element, determining what data should be written durably into the storage system to persist any changes for the operation, or where metadata and data can be determined to be stored across modular storage devices attached to a plurality of the storage controllers in the storage system.
In some embodiments the operations are token based transactions to efficiently communicate within a distributed system. Each transaction may be accompanied by or associated with a token, which gives permission to execute the transaction. The authorities 168 are able to maintain a pre-transaction state of the system until completion of the operation in some embodiments. The token based communication may be accomplished without a global lock across the system, and also enables restart of an operation in case of a disruption or other failure.
In some systems, for example in UNIX-style file systems, data is handled with an index node or inode, which specifies a data structure that represents an object in a file system. The object could be a file or a directory, for example. Metadata may accompany the object, as attributes such as permission data and a creation timestamp, among other attributes. A segment number could be assigned to all or a portion of such an object in a file system. In other systems, data segments are handled with a segment number assigned elsewhere. For purposes of discussion, the unit of distribution is an entity, and an entity can be a file, a directory or a segment. That is, entities are units of data or metadata stored by a storage system. Entities are grouped into sets called authorities. Each authority has an authority owner, which is a storage node that has the exclusive right to update the entities in the authority. In other words, a storage node contains the authority, and that the authority, in turn, contains entities.
A segment is a logical container of data in accordance with some embodiments. A segment is an address space between medium address space and physical flash locations, i.e., the data segment number, are in this address space. Segments may also contain meta-data, which enable data redundancy to be restored (rewritten to different flash locations or devices) without the involvement of higher level software. In one embodiment, an internal format of a segment contains client data and medium mappings to determine the position of that data. Each data segment is protected, e.g., from memory and other failures, by breaking the segment into a number of data and parity shards, where applicable. The data and parity shards are distributed, i.e., striped, across non-volatile solid state storage 152 coupled to the host CPUs 156 (See
A series of address-space transformations takes place across an entire storage system. At the top are the directory entries (file names) which link to an inode. Inodes point into medium address space, where data is logically stored. Medium addresses may be mapped through a series of indirect mediums to spread the load of large files, or implement data services like deduplication or snapshots. Medium addresses may be mapped through a series of indirect mediums to spread the load of large files, or implement data services like deduplication or snapshots. Segment addresses are then translated into physical flash locations. Physical flash locations have an address range bounded by the amount of flash in the system in accordance with some embodiments. Medium addresses and segment addresses are logical containers, and in some embodiments use a 128 bit or larger identifier so as to be practically infinite, with a likelihood of reuse calculated as longer than the expected life of the system. Addresses from logical containers are allocated in a hierarchical fashion in some embodiments. Initially, each non-volatile solid state storage unit 152 may be assigned a range of address space. Within this assigned range, the non-volatile solid state storage 152 is able to allocate addresses without synchronization with other non-volatile solid state storage 152.
Data and metadata is stored by a set of underlying storage layouts that are optimized for varying workload patterns and storage devices. These layouts incorporate multiple redundancy schemes, compression formats and index algorithms. Some of these layouts store information about authorities and authority masters, while others store file metadata and file data. The redundancy schemes include error correction codes that tolerate corrupted bits within a single storage device (such as a NAND flash chip), erasure codes that tolerate the failure of multiple storage nodes, and replication schemes that tolerate data center or regional failures. In some embodiments, low density parity check (‘LDPC’) code is used within a single storage unit. Reed-Solomon encoding is used within a storage cluster, and mirroring is used within a storage grid in some embodiments. Metadata may be stored using an ordered log structured index (such as a Log Structured Merge Tree), and large data may not be stored in a log structured layout.
In order to maintain consistency across multiple copies of an entity, the storage nodes agree implicitly on two things through calculations: (1) the authority that contains the entity, and (2) the storage node that contains the authority. The assignment of entities to authorities can be done by pseudo randomly assigning entities to authorities, by splitting entities into ranges based upon an externally produced key, or by placing a single entity into each authority. Examples of pseudorandom schemes are linear hashing and the Replication Under Scalable Hashing (‘RUSH’) family of hashes, including Controlled Replication Under Scalable Hashing (‘CRUSH’). In some embodiments, pseudo-random assignment is utilized only for assigning authorities to nodes because the set of nodes can change. The set of authorities cannot change so any subjective function may be applied in these embodiments. Some placement schemes automatically place authorities on storage nodes, while other placement schemes rely on an explicit mapping of authorities to storage nodes. In some embodiments, a pseudorandom scheme is utilized to map from each authority to a set of candidate authority owners. A pseudorandom data distribution function related to CRUSH may assign authorities to storage nodes and create a list of where the authorities are assigned. Each storage node has a copy of the pseudorandom data distribution function, and can arrive at the same calculation for distributing, and later finding or locating an authority. Each of the pseudorandom schemes requires the reachable set of storage nodes as input in some embodiments in order to conclude the same target nodes. Once an entity has been placed in an authority, the entity may be stored on physical devices so that no expected failure will lead to unexpected data loss. In some embodiments, rebalancing algorithms attempt to store the copies of all entities within an authority in the same layout and on the same set of machines.
Examples of expected failures include device failures, stolen machines, datacenter fires, and regional disasters, such as nuclear or geological events. Different failures lead to different levels of acceptable data loss. In some embodiments, a stolen storage node impacts neither the security nor the reliability of the system, while depending on system configuration, a regional event could lead to no loss of data, a few seconds or minutes of lost updates, or even complete data loss.
In the embodiments, the placement of data for storage redundancy is independent of the placement of authorities for data consistency. In some embodiments, storage nodes that contain authorities do not contain any persistent storage. Instead, the storage nodes are connected to non-volatile solid state storage units that do not contain authorities. The communications interconnect between storage nodes and non-volatile solid state storage units consists of multiple communication technologies and has non-uniform performance and fault tolerance characteristics. In some embodiments, as mentioned above, non-volatile solid state storage units are connected to storage nodes via PCI express, storage nodes are connected together within a single chassis using Ethernet backplane, and chassis are connected together to form a storage cluster. Storage clusters are connected to clients using Ethernet or fiber channel in some embodiments. If multiple storage clusters are configured into a storage grid, the multiple storage clusters are connected using the Internet or other long-distance networking links, such as a “metro scale” link or private link that does not traverse the internet.
Authority owners have the exclusive right to modify entities, to migrate entities from one non-volatile solid state storage unit to another non-volatile solid state storage unit, and to add and remove copies of entities. This allows for maintaining the redundancy of the underlying data. When an authority owner fails, is going to be decommissioned, or is overloaded, the authority is transferred to a new storage node. Transient failures make it non-trivial to ensure that all non-faulty machines agree upon the new authority location. The ambiguity that arises due to transient failures can be achieved automatically by a consensus protocol such as Paxos, hot-warm failover schemes, via manual intervention by a remote system administrator, or by a local hardware administrator (such as by physically removing the failed machine from the cluster, or pressing a button on the failed machine). In some embodiments, a consensus protocol is used, and failover is automatic. If too many failures or replication events occur in too short a time period, the system goes into a self-preservation mode and halts replication and data movement activities until an administrator intervenes in accordance with some embodiments.
As authorities are transferred between storage nodes and authority owners update entities in their authorities, the system transfers messages between the storage nodes and non-volatile solid state storage units. With regard to persistent messages, messages that have different purposes are of different types. Depending on the type of the message, the system maintains different ordering and durability guarantees. As the persistent messages are being processed, the messages are temporarily stored in multiple durable and non-durable storage hardware technologies. In some embodiments, messages are stored in RAM, NVRAM and on NAND flash devices, and a variety of protocols are used in order to make efficient use of each storage medium. Latency-sensitive client requests may be persisted in replicated NVRAM, and then later NAND, while background rebalancing operations are persisted directly to NAND.
Persistent messages are persistently stored prior to being transmitted. This allows the system to continue to serve client requests despite failures and component replacement. Although many hardware components contain unique identifiers that are visible to system administrators, manufacturer, hardware supply chain and ongoing monitoring quality control infrastructure, applications running on top of the infrastructure address virtualize addresses. These virtualized addresses do not change over the lifetime of the storage system, regardless of component failures and replacements. This allows each component of the storage system to be replaced over time without reconfiguration or disruptions of client request processing, i.e., the system supports non-disruptive upgrades.
In some embodiments, the virtualized addresses are stored with sufficient redundancy. A continuous monitoring system correlates hardware and software status and the hardware identifiers. This allows detection and prediction of failures due to faulty components and manufacturing details. The monitoring system also enables the proactive transfer of authorities and entities away from impacted devices before failure occurs by removing the component from the critical path in some embodiments.
Storage clusters 161, in various embodiments as disclosed herein, can be contrasted with storage arrays in general. The storage nodes 150 are part of a collection that creates the storage cluster 161. Each storage node 150 owns a slice of data and computing required to provide the data. Multiple storage nodes 150 cooperate to store and retrieve the data. Storage memory or storage devices, as used in storage arrays in general, are less involved with processing and manipulating the data. Storage memory or storage devices in a storage array receive commands to read, write, or erase data. The storage memory or storage devices in a storage array are not aware of a larger system in which they are embedded, or what the data means. Storage memory or storage devices in storage arrays can include various types of storage memory, such as RAM, solid state drives, hard disk drives, etc. The storage units 152 described herein have multiple interfaces active simultaneously and serving multiple purposes. In some embodiments, some of the functionality of a storage node 150 is shifted into a storage unit 152, transforming the storage unit 152 into a combination of storage unit 152 and storage node 150. Placing computing (relative to storage data) into the storage unit 152 places this computing closer to the data itself. The various system embodiments have a hierarchy of storage node layers with different capabilities. By contrast, in a storage array, a controller owns and knows everything about all of the data that the controller manages in a shelf or storage devices. In a storage cluster 161, as described herein, multiple controllers in multiple storage units 152 and/or storage nodes 150 cooperate in various ways (e.g., for erasure coding, data sharding, metadata communication and redundancy, storage capacity expansion or contraction, data recovery, and so on).
The physical storage is divided into named regions based on application usage in some embodiments. The NVRAM 204 is a contiguous block of reserved memory in the storage unit 152 DRAM 216, and is backed by NAND flash. NVRAM 204 is logically divided into multiple memory regions written for two as spool (e.g., spool_region). Space within the NVRAM 204 spools is managed by each authority 168 independently. Each device provides an amount of storage space to each authority 168. That authority 168 further manages lifetimes and allocations within that space. Examples of a spool include distributed transactions or notions. When the primary power to a storage unit 152 fails, onboard super-capacitors provide a short duration of power hold up. During this holdup interval, the contents of the NVRAM 204 are flushed to flash memory 206. On the next power-on, the contents of the NVRAM 204 are recovered from the flash memory 206.
As for the storage unit controller, the responsibility of the logical “controller” is distributed across each of the blades containing authorities 168. This distribution of logical control is shown in
In the compute and storage planes 256, 258 of
Still referring to
Because authorities 168 are stateless, they can migrate between blades 252. Each authority 168 has a unique identifier. NVRAM 204 and flash 206 partitions are associated with authorities' 168 identifiers, not with the blades 252 on which they are running in some. Thus, when an authority 168 migrates, the authority 168 continues to manage the same storage partitions from its new location. When a new blade 252 is installed in an embodiment of the storage cluster, the system automatically rebalances load by: partitioning the new blade's 252 storage for use by the system's authorities 168, migrating selected authorities 168 to the new blade 252, starting endpoints 272 on the new blade 252 and including them in the switch fabric's 146 client connection distribution algorithm.
From their new locations, migrated authorities 168 persist the contents of their NVRAM 204 partitions on flash 206, process read and write requests from other authorities 168, and fulfill the client requests that endpoints 272 direct to them. Similarly, if a blade 252 fails or is removed, the system redistributes its authorities 168 among the system's remaining blades 252. The redistributed authorities 168 continue to perform their original functions from their new locations.
The embodiments described herein may utilize various software, communication and/or networking protocols. In addition, the configuration of the hardware and/or software may be adjusted to accommodate various protocols. For example, the embodiments may utilize Active Directory, which is a database based system that provides authentication, directory, policy, and other services in a WINDOWS™ environment. In these embodiments, LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) is one example application protocol for querying and modifying items in directory service providers such as Active Directory. In some embodiments, a network lock manager (‘NLM’) is utilized as a facility that works in cooperation with the Network File System (‘NFS’) to provide a System V style of advisory file and record locking over a network. The Server Message Block (‘SMB’) protocol, one version of which is also known as Common Internet File System (‘CIFS’), may be integrated with the storage systems discussed herein. SMP operates as an application-layer network protocol typically used for providing shared access to files, printers, and serial ports and miscellaneous communications between nodes on a network. SMB also provides an authenticated inter-process communication mechanism. AMAZON™ S3 (Simple Storage Service) is a web service offered by Amazon Web Services, and the systems described herein may interface with Amazon S3 through web services interfaces (REST (representational state transfer), SOAP (simple object access protocol), and BitTorrent). A RESTful API (application programming interface) breaks down a transaction to create a series of small modules. Each module addresses a particular underlying part of the transaction. The control or permissions provided with these embodiments, especially for object data, may include utilization of an access control list (‘ACL’). The ACL is a list of permissions attached to an object and the ACL specifies which users or system processes are granted access to objects, as well as what operations are allowed on given objects. The systems may utilize Internet Protocol version 6 (‘IPv6’), as well as IPv4, for the communications protocol that provides an identification and location system for computers on networks and routes traffic across the Internet. The routing of packets between networked systems may include Equal-cost multi-path routing (‘ECMP’), which is a routing strategy where next-hop packet forwarding to a single destination can occur over multiple “best paths” which tie for top place in routing metric calculations. Multi-path routing can be used in conjunction with most routing protocols, because it is a per-hop decision limited to a single router. The software may support Multi-tenancy, which is an architecture in which a single instance of a software application serves multiple customers. Each customer may be referred to as a tenant. Tenants may be given the ability to customize some parts of the application, but may not customize the application's code, in some embodiments. The embodiments may maintain audit logs. An audit log is a document that records an event in a computing system. In addition to documenting what resources were accessed, audit log entries typically include destination and source addresses, a timestamp, and user login information for compliance with various regulations. The embodiments may support various key management policies, such as encryption key rotation. In addition, the system may support dynamic root passwords or some variation dynamically changing passwords.
In the example depicted in
The cloud services provider 302 depicted in
In the example depicted in
In the example depicted in
Although not explicitly depicted in
In order to enable the storage system 306 and users of the storage system 306 to make use of the services provided by the cloud services provider 302, a cloud migration process may take place during which data, applications, or other elements from an organization's local systems (or even from another cloud environment) are moved to the cloud services provider 302. In order to successfully migrate data, applications, or other elements to the cloud services provider's 302 environment, middleware such as a cloud migration tool may be utilized to bridge gaps between the cloud services provider's 302 environment and an organization's environment. Such cloud migration tools may also be configured to address potentially high network costs and long transfer times associated with migrating large volumes of data to the cloud services provider 302, as well as addressing security concerns associated with sensitive data to the cloud services provider 302 over data communications networks. In order to further enable the storage system 306 and users of the storage system 306 to make use of the services provided by the cloud services provider 302, a cloud orchestrator may also be used to arrange and coordinate automated tasks in pursuit of creating a consolidated process or workflow. Such a cloud orchestrator may perform tasks such as configuring various components, whether those components are cloud components or on-premises components, as well as managing the interconnections between such components. The cloud orchestrator can simplify the inter-component communication and connections to ensure that links are correctly configured and maintained.
In the example depicted in
The cloud services provider 302 may also be configured to provide access to virtualized computing environments to the storage system 306 and users of the storage system 306. Such virtualized computing environments may be embodied, for example, as a virtual machine or other virtualized computer hardware platforms, virtual storage devices, virtualized computer network resources, and so on. Examples of such virtualized environments can include virtual machines that are created to emulate an actual computer, virtualized desktop environments that separate a logical desktop from a physical machine, virtualized file systems that allow uniform access to different types of concrete file systems, and many others.
Although the example depicted in
Readers will appreciate that by pairing the storage systems described herein with one or more cloud services providers, various offerings may be enabled. For example, disaster recovery as a service (‘DRaaS’) may be provided where cloud resources are utilized to protect applications and data from disruption caused by disaster, including in embodiments where the storage systems may serve as the primary data store. In such embodiments, a total system backup may be taken that allows for business continuity in the event of system failure. In such embodiments, cloud data backup techniques (by themselves or as part of a larger DRaaS solution) may also be integrated into an overall solution that includes the storage systems and cloud services providers described herein.
The storage systems described herein, as well as the cloud services providers, may be utilized to provide a wide array of security features. For example, the storage systems may encrypt data at rest (and data may be sent to and from the storage systems encrypted) and may make use of Key Management-as-a-Service (‘KMaaS’) to manage encryption keys, keys for locking and unlocking storage devices, and so on. Likewise, cloud data security gateways or similar mechanisms may be utilized to ensure that data stored within the storage systems does not improperly end up being stored in the cloud as part of a cloud data backup operation. Furthermore, microsegmentation or identity-based-segmentation may be utilized in a data center that includes the storage systems or within the cloud services provider, to create secure zones in data centers and cloud deployments that enables the isolation of workloads from one another.
For further explanation,
The storage system 306 depicted in
The storage resources 308 depicted in
The storage resources 308 depicted in
The example storage system 306 depicted in
The example storage system 306 depicted in
The example storage system 306 depicted in
The storage system 306 depicted in
The communications resources 310 can also include mechanisms for accessing storage resources 308 within the storage system 306 utilizing serial attached SCSI (‘SAS’), serial ATA (‘SATA’) bus interfaces for connecting storage resources 308 within the storage system 306 to host bus adapters within the storage system 306, internet small computer systems interface (‘iSCSI’) technologies to provide block-level access to storage resources 308 within the storage system 306, and other communications resources that that may be useful in facilitating data communications between components within the storage system 306, as well as data communications between the storage system 306 and computing devices that are outside of the storage system 306.
The storage system 306 depicted in
The storage system 306 depicted in
The software resources 314 may also include software that is useful in implementing software-defined storage (‘SDS’). In such an example, the software resources 314 may include one or more modules of computer program instructions that, when executed, are useful in policy-based provisioning and management of data storage that is independent of the underlying hardware. Such software resources 314 may be useful in implementing storage virtualization to separate the storage hardware from the software that manages the storage hardware.
The software resources 314 may also include software that is useful in facilitating and optimizing I/O operations that are directed to the storage resources 308 in the storage system 306. For example, the software resources 314 may include software modules that perform carry out various data reduction techniques such as, for example, data compression, data deduplication, and others. The software resources 314 may include software modules that intelligently group together I/O operations to facilitate better usage of the underlying storage resource 308, software modules that perform data migration operations to migrate from within a storage system, as well as software modules that perform other functions. Such software resources 314 may be embodied as one or more software containers or in many other ways.
For further explanation,
The cloud-based storage system 318 depicted in
In the example method depicted in
Consider an example in which the cloud computing environment 316 is embodied as AWS and the cloud computing instances are embodied as EC2 instances. In such an example, the cloud computing instance 320 that operates as the primary controller may be deployed on one of the instance types that has a relatively large amount of memory and processing power while the cloud computing instance 322 that operates as the secondary controller may be deployed on one of the instance types that has a relatively small amount of memory and processing power. In such an example, upon the occurrence of a failover event where the roles of primary and secondary are switched, a double failover may actually be carried out such that: 1) a first failover event where the cloud computing instance 322 that formerly operated as the secondary controller begins to operate as the primary controller, and 2) a third cloud computing instance (not shown) that is of an instance type that has a relatively large amount of memory and processing power is spun up with a copy of the storage controller application, where the third cloud computing instance begins operating as the primary controller while the cloud computing instance 322 that originally operated as the secondary controller begins operating as the secondary controller again. In such an example, the cloud computing instance 320 that formerly operated as the primary controller may be terminated. Readers will appreciate that in alternative embodiments, the cloud computing instance 320 that is operating as the secondary controller after the failover event may continue to operate as the secondary controller and the cloud computing instance 322 that operated as the primary controller after the occurrence of the failover event may be terminated once the primary role has been assumed by the third cloud computing instance (not shown).
Readers will appreciate that while the embodiments described above relate to embodiments where one cloud computing instance 320 operates as the primary controller and the second cloud computing instance 322 operates as the secondary controller, other embodiments are within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, each cloud computing instance 320, 322 may operate as a primary controller for some portion of the address space supported by the cloud-based storage system 318, each cloud computing instance 320, 322 may operate as a primary controller where the servicing of I/O operations directed to the cloud-based storage system 318 are divided in some other way, and so on. In fact, in other embodiments where costs savings may be prioritized over performance demands, only a single cloud computing instance may exist that contains the storage controller application.
The cloud-based storage system 318 depicted in
In the example depicted in
In the example depicted in
In the example depicted in
Readers will appreciate that when a request to write data is received by a particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338, the software daemon 328, 332, 336 or some other module of computer program instructions that is executing on the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n may be configured to not only write the data to its own local storage 330, 334, 338 resources and any appropriate block-storage 342, 344, 346 that are offered by the cloud computing environment 316, but the software daemon 328, 332, 336 or some other module of computer program instructions that is executing on the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n may also be configured to write the data to cloud-based object storage 348 that is attached to the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n. The cloud-based object storage 348 that is attached to the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n may be embodied, for example, as Amazon Simple Storage Service (‘S3’) storage that is accessible by the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n. In other embodiments, the cloud computing instances 320, 322 that each include the storage controller application 324, 326 may initiate the storage of the data in the local storage 330, 334, 338 of the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n and the cloud-based object storage 348.
Readers will appreciate that, as described above, the cloud-based storage system 318 may be used to provide block storage services to users of the cloud-based storage system 318. While the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources and the block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n may support block-level access, the cloud-based object storage 348 that is attached to the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n supports only object-based access. In order to address this, the software daemon 328, 332, 336 or some other module of computer program instructions that is executing on the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n may be configured to take blocks of data, package those blocks into objects, and write the objects to the cloud-based object storage 348 that is attached to the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n.
Consider an example in which data is written to the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources and the block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n in 1 MB blocks. In such an example, assume that a user of the cloud-based storage system 318 issues a request to write data that, after being compressed and deduplicated by the storage controller application 324, 326 results in the need to write 5 MB of data. In such an example, writing the data to the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources and the block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n is relatively straightforward as 5 blocks that are 1 MB in size are written to the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources and the block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n. In such an example, the software daemon 328, 332, 336 or some other module of computer program instructions that is executing on the particular cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n may be configured to: 1) create a first object that includes the first 1 MB of data and write the first object to the cloud-based object storage 348, 2) create a second object that includes the second 1 MB of data and write the second object to the cloud-based object storage 348, 3) create a third object that includes the third 1 MB of data and write the third object to the cloud-based object storage 348, and so on. As such, in some embodiments, each object that is written to the cloud-based object storage 348 may be identical (or nearly identical) in size. Readers will appreciate that in such an example, metadata that is associated with the data itself may be included in each object (e.g., the first 1 MB of the object is data and the remaining portion is metadata associated with the data).
Readers will appreciate that the cloud-based object storage 348 may be incorporated into the cloud-based storage system 318 to increase the durability of the cloud-based storage system 318. Continuing with the example described above where the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n are EC2 instances, readers will understand that EC2 instances are only guaranteed to have a monthly uptime of 99.9% and data stored in the local instance store only persists during the lifetime of the EC2 instance. As such, relying on the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338 as the only source of persistent data storage in the cloud-based storage system 318 may result in a relatively unreliable storage system. Likewise, EBS volumes are designed for 99.999% availability. As such, even relying on EBS as the persistent data store in the cloud-based storage system 318 may result in a storage system that is not sufficiently durable. Amazon S3, however, is designed to provide 99.999999999% durability, meaning that a cloud-based storage system 318 that can incorporate S3 into its pool of storage is substantially more durable than various other options.
Readers will appreciate that while a cloud-based storage system 318 that can incorporate S3 into its pool of storage is substantially more durable than various other options, utilizing S3 as the primary pool of storage may result in storage system that has relatively slow response times and relatively long I/O latencies. As such, the cloud-based storage system 318 depicted in
In some embodiments, all data that is stored by the cloud-based storage system 318 may be stored in both: 1) the cloud-based object storage 348, and 2) at least one of the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources or block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n. In such embodiments, the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources and block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n may effectively operate as cache that generally includes all data that is also stored in S3, such that all reads of data may be serviced by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n without requiring the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n to access the cloud-based object storage 348. Readers will appreciate that in other embodiments, however, all data that is stored by the cloud-based storage system 318 may be stored in the cloud-based object storage 348, but less than all data that is stored by the cloud-based storage system 318 may be stored in at least one of the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources or block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n. In such an example, various policies may be utilized to determine which subset of the data that is stored by the cloud-based storage system 318 should reside in both: 1) the cloud-based object storage 348, and 2) at least one of the local storage 330, 334, 338 resources or block-storage 342, 344, 346 resources that are utilized by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n.
As described above, when the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338 are embodied as EC2 instances, the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338 are only guaranteed to have a monthly uptime of 99.9% and data stored in the local instance store only persists during the lifetime of each cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338. As such, one or more modules of computer program instructions that are executing within the cloud-based storage system 318 (e.g., a monitoring module that is executing on its own EC2 instance) may be designed to handle the failure of one or more of the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338. In such an example, the monitoring module may handle the failure of one or more of the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338 by creating one or more new cloud computing instances with local storage, retrieving data that was stored on the failed cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n from the cloud-based object storage 348, and storing the data retrieved from the cloud-based object storage 348 in local storage on the newly created cloud computing instances. Readers will appreciate that many variants of this process may be implemented.
Consider an example in which all cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n with local storage 330, 334, 338 failed. In such an example, the monitoring module may create new cloud computing instances with local storage, where high-bandwidth instances types are selected that allow for the maximum data transfer rates between the newly created high-bandwidth cloud computing instances with local storage and the cloud-based object storage 348. Readers will appreciate that instances types are selected that allow for the maximum data transfer rates between the new cloud computing instances and the cloud-based object storage 348 such that the new high-bandwidth cloud computing instances can be rehydrated with data from the cloud-based object storage 348 as quickly as possible. Once the new high-bandwidth cloud computing instances are rehydrated with data from the cloud-based object storage 348, less expensive lower-bandwidth cloud computing instances may be created, data may be migrated to the less expensive lower-bandwidth cloud computing instances, and the high-bandwidth cloud computing instances may be terminated.
Readers will appreciate that in some embodiments, the number of new cloud computing instances that are created may substantially exceed the number of cloud computing instances that are needed to locally store all of the data stored by the cloud-based storage system 318. The number of new cloud computing instances that are created may substantially exceed the number of cloud computing instances that are needed to locally store all of the data stored by the cloud-based storage system 318 in order to more rapidly pull data from the cloud-based object storage 348 and into the new cloud computing instances, as each new cloud computing instance can (in parallel) retrieve some portion of the data stored by the cloud-based storage system 318. In such embodiments, once the data stored by the cloud-based storage system 318 has been pulled into the newly created cloud computing instances, the data may be consolidated within a subset of the newly created cloud computing instances and those newly created cloud computing instances that are excessive may be terminated.
Consider an example in which 1000 cloud computing instances are needed in order to locally store all valid data that users of the cloud-based storage system 318 have written to the cloud-based storage system 318. In such an example, assume that all 1,000 cloud computing instances fail. In such an example, the monitoring module may cause 100,000 cloud computing instances to be created, where each cloud computing instance is responsible for retrieving, from the cloud-based object storage 348, distinct 1/100,000th chunks of the valid data that users of the cloud-based storage system 318 have written to the cloud-based storage system 318 and locally storing the distinct chunk of the dataset that it retrieved. In such an example, because each of the 100,000 cloud computing instances can retrieve data from the cloud-based object storage 348 in parallel, the caching layer may be restored 100 times faster as compared to an embodiment where the monitoring module only create 1000 replacement cloud computing instances. In such an example, over time the data that is stored locally in the 100,000 could be consolidated into 1,000 cloud computing instances and the remaining 99,000 cloud computing instances could be terminated.
Readers will appreciate that various performance aspects of the cloud-based storage system 318 may be monitored (e.g., by a monitoring module that is executing in an EC2 instance) such that the cloud-based storage system 318 can be scaled-up or scaled-out as needed. Consider an example in which the monitoring module monitors the performance of the could-based storage system 318 via communications with one or more of the cloud computing instances 320, 322 that each are used to support the execution of a storage controller application 324, 326, via monitoring communications between cloud computing instances 320, 322, 340a, 340b, 340n, via monitoring communications between cloud computing instances 320, 322, 340a, 340b, 340n and the cloud-based object storage 348, or in some other way. In such an example, assume that the monitoring module determines that the cloud computing instances 320, 322 that are used to support the execution of a storage controller application 324, 326 are undersized and not sufficiently servicing the I/O requests that are issued by users of the cloud-based storage system 318. In such an example, the monitoring module may create a new, more powerful cloud computing instance (e.g., a cloud computing instance of a type that includes more processing power, more memory, etc. . . . ) that includes the storage controller application such that the new, more powerful cloud computing instance can begin operating as the primary controller. Likewise, if the monitoring module determines that the cloud computing instances 320, 322 that are used to support the execution of a storage controller application 324, 326 are oversized and that cost savings could be gained by switching to a smaller, less powerful cloud computing instance, the monitoring module may create a new, less powerful (and less expensive) cloud computing instance that includes the storage controller application such that the new, less powerful cloud computing instance can begin operating as the primary controller.
Consider, as an additional example of dynamically sizing the cloud-based storage system 318, an example in which the monitoring module determines that the utilization of the local storage that is collectively provided by the cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n has reached a predetermined utilization threshold (e.g., 95%). In such an example, the monitoring module may create additional cloud computing instances with local storage to expand the pool of local storage that is offered by the cloud computing instances. Alternatively, the monitoring module may create one or more new cloud computing instances that have larger amounts of local storage than the already existing cloud computing instances 340a, 340b, 340n, such that data stored in an already existing cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n can be migrated to the one or more new cloud computing instances and the already existing cloud computing instance 340a, 340b, 340n can be terminated, thereby expanding the pool of local storage that is offered by the cloud computing instances. Likewise, if the pool of local storage that is offered by the cloud computing instances is unnecessarily large, data can be consolidated and some cloud computing instances can be terminated.
Readers will appreciate that the cloud-based storage system 318 may be sized up and down automatically by a monitoring module applying a predetermined set of rules that may be relatively simple of relatively complicated. In fact, the monitoring module may not only take into account the current state of the cloud-based storage system 318, but the monitoring module may also apply predictive policies that are based on, for example, observed behavior (e.g., every night from 10 PM until 6 AM usage of the storage system is relatively light), predetermined fingerprints (e.g., every time a virtual desktop infrastructure adds 100 virtual desktops, the number of IOPS directed to the storage system increase by X), and so on. In such an example, the dynamic scaling of the cloud-based storage system 318 may be based on current performance metrics, predicted workloads, and many other factors, including combinations thereof.
Readers will further appreciate that because the cloud-based storage system 318 may be dynamically scaled, the cloud-based storage system 318 may even operate in a way that is more dynamic. Consider the example of garbage collection. In a traditional storage system, the amount of storage is fixed. As such, at some point the storage system may be forced to perform garbage collection as the amount of available storage has become so constrained that the storage system is on the verge of running out of storage. In contrast, the cloud-based storage system 318 described here can always ‘add’ additional storage (e.g., by adding more cloud computing instances with local storage). Because the cloud-based storage system 318 described here can always ‘add’ additional storage, the cloud-based storage system 318 can make more intelligent decisions regarding when to perform garbage collection. For example, the cloud-based storage system 318 may implement a policy that garbage collection only be performed when the number of IOPS being serviced by the cloud-based storage system 318 falls below a certain level. In some embodiments, other system-level functions (e.g., deduplication, compression) may also be turned off and on in response to system load, given that the size of the cloud-based storage system 318 is not constrained in the same way that traditional storage systems are constrained.
Readers will appreciate that embodiments of the present disclosure resolve an issue with block-storage services offered by some cloud computing environments as some cloud computing environments only allow for one cloud computing instance to connect to a block-storage volume at a single time. For example, in Amazon AWS, only a single EC2 instance may be connected to an EBS volume. Through the use of EC2 instances with local storage, embodiments of the present disclosure can offer multi-connect capabilities where multiple EC2 instances can connect to another EC2 instance with local storage (‘a drive instance’). In such embodiments, the drive instances may include software executing within the drive instance that allows the drive instance to support I/O directed to a particular volume from each connected EC2 instance. As such, some embodiments of the present disclosure may be embodied as multi-connect block storage services that may not include all of the components depicted in
In some embodiments, especially in embodiments where the cloud-based object storage 348 resources are embodied as Amazon S3, the cloud-based storage system 318 may include one or more modules (e.g., a module of computer program instructions executing on an EC2 instance) that are configured to ensure that when the local storage of a particular cloud computing instance is rehydrated with data from S3, the appropriate data is actually in S3. This issue arises largely because S3 implements an eventual consistency model where, when overwriting an existing object, reads of the object will eventually (but not necessarily immediately) become consistent and will eventually (but not necessarily immediately) return the overwritten version of the object. To address this issue, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, objects in S3 are never overwritten. Instead, a traditional ‘overwrite’ would result in the creation of the new object (that includes the updated version of the data) and the eventual deletion of the old object (that includes the previous version of the data).
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, as part of an attempt to never (or almost never) overwrite an object, when data is written to S3 the resultant object may be tagged with a sequence number. In some embodiments, these sequence numbers may be persisted elsewhere (e.g., in a database) such that at any point in time, the sequence number associated with the most up-to-date version of some piece of data can be known. In such a way, a determination can be made as to whether S3 has the most recent version of some piece of data by merely reading the sequence number associated with an object—and without actually reading the data from S3. The ability to make this determination may be particularly important when a cloud computing instance with local storage crashes, as it would be undesirable to rehydrate the local storage of a replacement cloud computing instance with out-of-date data. In fact, because the cloud-based storage system 318 does not need to access the data to verify its validity, the data can stay encrypted and access charges can be avoided.
The storage systems described above may carry out intelligent data backup techniques through which data stored in the storage system may be copied and stored in a distinct location to avoid data loss in the event of equipment failure or some other form of catastrophe. For example, the storage systems described above may be configured to examine each backup to avoid restoring the storage system to an undesirable state. Consider an example in which malware infects the storage system. In such an example, the storage system may include software resources 314 that can scan each backup to identify backups that were captured before the malware infected the storage system and those backups that were captured after the malware infected the storage system. In such an example, the storage system may restore itself from a backup that does not include the malware—or at least not restore the portions of a backup that contained the malware. In such an example, the storage system may include software resources 314 that can scan each backup to identify the presences of malware (or a virus, or some other undesirable), for example, by identifying write operations that were serviced by the storage system and originated from a network subnet that is suspected to have delivered the malware, by identifying write operations that were serviced by the storage system and originated from a user that is suspected to have delivered the malware, by identifying write operations that were serviced by the storage system and examining the content of the write operation against fingerprints of the malware, and in many other ways.
Readers will further appreciate that the backups (often in the form of one or more snapshots) may also be utilized to perform rapid recovery of the storage system. Consider an example in which the storage system is infected with ransomware that locks users out of the storage system. In such an example, software resources 314 within the storage system may be configured to detect the presence of ransomware and may be further configured to restore the storage system to a point-in-time, using the retained backups, prior to the point-in-time at which the ransomware infected the storage system. In such an example, the presence of ransomware may be explicitly detected through the use of software tools utilized by the system, through the use of a key (e.g., a USB drive) that is inserted into the storage system, or in a similar way. Likewise, the presence of ransomware may be inferred in response to system activity meeting a predetermined fingerprint such as, for example, no reads or writes coming into the system for a predetermined period of time.
Readers will appreciate that the various components described above may be grouped into one or more optimized computing packages as converged infrastructures. Such converged infrastructures may include pools of computers, storage and networking resources that can be shared by multiple applications and managed in a collective manner using policy-driven processes. Such converged infrastructures may be implemented with a converged infrastructure reference architecture, with standalone appliances, with a software driven hyper-converged approach (e.g., hyper-converged infrastructures), or in other ways.
Readers will appreciate that the storage systems described above may be useful for supporting various types of software applications. For example, the storage system 306 may be useful in supporting artificial intelligence (‘AI’) applications, database applications, DevOps projects, electronic design automation tools, event-driven software applications, high performance computing applications, simulation applications, high-speed data capture and analysis applications, machine learning applications, media production applications, media serving applications, picture archiving and communication systems (‘PACS’) applications, software development applications, virtual reality applications, augmented reality applications, and many other types of applications by providing storage resources to such applications.
The storage systems described above may operate to support a wide variety of applications. In view of the fact that the storage systems include compute resources, storage resources, and a wide variety of other resources, the storage systems may be well suited to support applications that are resource intensive such as, for example, AI applications. AI applications may be deployed in a variety of fields, including: predictive maintenance in manufacturing and related fields, healthcare applications such as patient data & risk analytics, retail and marketing deployments (e.g., search advertising, social media advertising), supply chains solutions, fintech solutions such as business analytics & reporting tools, operational deployments such as real-time analytics tools, application performance management tools, IT infrastructure management tools, and many others.
Such AI applications may enable devices to perceive their environment and take actions that maximize their chance of success at some goal. Examples of such AI applications can include IBM Watson, Microsoft Oxford, Google DeepMind, Baidu Minwa, and others. The storage systems described above may also be well suited to support other types of applications that are resource intensive such as, for example, machine learning applications. Machine learning applications may perform various types of data analysis to automate analytical model building. Using algorithms that iteratively learn from data, machine learning applications can enable computers to learn without being explicitly programmed. One particular area of machine learning is referred to as reinforcement learning, which involves taking suitable actions to maximize reward in a particular situation. Reinforcement learning may be employed to find the best possible behavior or path that a particular software application or machine should take in a specific situation. Reinforcement learning differs from other areas of machine learning (e.g., supervised learning, unsupervised learning) in that correct input/output pairs need not be presented for reinforcement learning and sub-optimal actions need not be explicitly corrected.
In addition to the resources already described, the storage systems described above may also include graphics processing units (‘GPUs’), occasionally referred to as visual processing unit (‘VPUs’). Such GPUs may be embodied as specialized electronic circuits that rapidly manipulate and alter memory to accelerate the creation of images in a frame buffer intended for output to a display device. Such GPUs may be included within any of the computing devices that are part of the storage systems described above, including as one of many individually scalable components of a storage system, where other examples of individually scalable components of such storage system can include storage components, memory components, compute components (e.g., CPUs, FPGAs, ASICs), networking components, software components, and others. In addition to GPUs, the storage systems described above may also include neural network processors (‘NNPs’) for use in various aspects of neural network processing. Such NNPs may be used in place of (or in addition to) GPUs and may also be independently scalable.
As described above, the storage systems described herein may be configured to support artificial intelligence applications, machine learning applications, big data analytics applications, and many other types of applications. The rapid growth in these sort of applications is being driven by three technologies: deep learning (DL), GPU processors, and Big Data. Deep learning is a computing model that makes use of massively parallel neural networks inspired by the human brain. Instead of experts handcrafting software, a deep learning model writes its own software by learning from lots of examples. Such GPUs may include thousands of cores that are well-suited to run algorithms that loosely represent the parallel nature of the human brain.
Advances in deep neural networks, including the development of multi-layer neural networks, have ignited a new wave of algorithms and tools for data scientists to tap into their data with artificial intelligence (AI). With improved algorithms, larger data sets, and various frameworks (including open-source software libraries for machine learning across a range of tasks), data scientists are tackling new use cases like autonomous driving vehicles, natural language processing and understanding, computer vision, machine reasoning, strong AI, and many others. Applications of such techniques may include: machine and vehicular object detection, identification and avoidance; visual recognition, classification and tagging; algorithmic financial trading strategy performance management; simultaneous localization and mapping; predictive maintenance of high-value machinery; prevention against cyber security threats, expertise automation; image recognition and classification; question answering; robotics; text analytics (extraction, classification) and text generation and translation; and many others. Applications of AI techniques has materialized in a wide array of products include, for example, Amazon Echo's speech recognition technology that allows users to talk to their machines, Google Translate™ which allows for machine-based language translation, Spotify's Discover Weekly that provides recommendations on new songs and artists that a user may like based on the user's usage and traffic analysis, Quill's text generation offering that takes structured data and turns it into narrative stories, Chatbots that provide real-time, contextually specific answers to questions in a dialog format, and many others.
Data is the heart of modern AI and deep learning algorithms. Before training can begin, one problem that must be addressed revolves around collecting the labeled data that is crucial for training an accurate AI model. A full scale AI deployment may be required to continuously collect, clean, transform, label, and store large amounts of data. Adding additional high quality data points directly translates to more accurate models and better insights. Data samples may undergo a series of processing steps including, but not limited to: 1) ingesting the data from an external source into the training system and storing the data in raw form, 2) cleaning and transforming the data in a format convenient for training, including linking data samples to the appropriate label, 3) exploring parameters and models, quickly testing with a smaller dataset, and iterating to converge on the most promising models to push into the production cluster, 4) executing training phases to select random batches of input data, including both new and older samples, and feeding those into production GPU servers for computation to update model parameters, and 5) evaluating including using a holdback portion of the data not used in training in order to evaluate model accuracy on the holdout data. This lifecycle may apply for any type of parallelized machine learning, not just neural networks or deep learning. For example, standard machine learning frameworks may rely on CPUs instead of GPUs but the data ingest and training workflows may be the same. Readers will appreciate that a single shared storage data hub creates a coordination point throughout the lifecycle without the need for extra data copies among the ingest, preprocessing, and training stages. Rarely is the ingested data used for only one purpose, and shared storage gives the flexibility to train multiple different models or apply traditional analytics to the data.
Readers will appreciate that each stage in the AI data pipeline may have varying requirements from the data hub (e.g., the storage system or collection of storage systems). Scale-out storage systems must deliver uncompromising performance for all manner of access types and patterns—from small, metadata-heavy to large files, from random to sequential access patterns, and from low to high concurrency. The storage systems described above may serve as an ideal AI data hub as the systems may service unstructured workloads. In the first stage, data is ideally ingested and stored on to the same data hub that following stages will use, in order to avoid excess data copying. The next two steps can be done on a standard compute server that optionally includes a GPU, and then in the fourth and last stage, full training production jobs are run on powerful GPU-accelerated servers. Often, there is a production pipeline alongside an experimental pipeline operating on the same dataset. Further, the GPU-accelerated servers can be used independently for different models or joined together to train on one larger model, even spanning multiple systems for distributed training. If the shared storage tier is slow, then data must be copied to local storage for each phase, resulting in wasted time staging data onto different servers. The ideal data hub for the AI training pipeline delivers performance similar to data stored locally on the server node while also having the simplicity and performance to enable all pipeline stages to operate concurrently.
In order for the storage systems described above to serve as a data hub or as part of an AI deployment, in some embodiments the storage systems may be configured to provide DMA between storage devices that are included in the storage systems and one or more GPUs that are used in an AI or big data analytics pipeline. The one or more GPUs may be coupled to the storage system, for example, via NVMe-over-Fabrics (‘NVMe-oF’) such that bottlenecks such as the host CPU can be bypassed and the storage system (or one of the components contained therein) can directly access GPU memory. In such an example, the storage systems may leverage API hooks to the GPUs to transfer data directly to the GPUs. For example, the GPUs may be embodied as Nvidia™ GPUs and the storage systems may support GPUDirect Storage (‘GDS’) software, or have similar proprietary software, that enables the storage system to transfer data to the GPUs via RDMA or similar mechanism. Readers will appreciate that in embodiments where the storage systems are embodied as cloud-based storage systems as described below, virtual drive or other components within such a cloud-based storage system may also be configured
Although the preceding paragraphs discuss deep learning applications, readers will appreciate that the storage systems described herein may also be part of a distributed deep learning (‘DDL’) platform to support the execution of DDL algorithms. The storage systems described above may also be paired with other technologies such as TensorFlow, an open-source software library for dataflow programming across a range of tasks that may be used for machine learning applications such as neural networks, to facilitate the development of such machine learning models, applications, and so on.
The storage systems described above may also be used in a neuromorphic computing environment. Neuromorphic computing is a form of computing that mimics brain cells. To support neuromorphic computing, an architecture of interconnected “neurons” replace traditional computing models with low-powered signals that go directly between neurons for more efficient computation. Neuromorphic computing may make use of very-large-scale integration (VLSI) systems containing electronic analog circuits to mimic neuro-biological architectures present in the nervous system, as well as analog, digital, mixed-mode analog/digital VLSI, and software systems that implement models of neural systems for perception, motor control, or multisensory integration.
Readers will appreciate that the storage systems described above may be configured to support the storage or use of (among other types of data) blockchains. In addition to supporting the storage and use of blockchain technologies, the storage systems described above may also support the storage and use of derivative items such as, for example, open source blockchains and related tools that are part of the IBM™ Hyperledger project, permissioned blockchains in which a certain number of trusted parties are allowed to access the block chain, blockchain products that enable developers to build their own distributed ledger projects, and others. Blockchains and the storage systems described herein may be leveraged to support on-chain storage of data as well as off-chain storage of data.
Off-chain storage of data can be implemented in a variety of ways and can occur when the data itself is not stored within the blockchain. For example, in one embodiment, a hash function may be utilized and the data itself may be fed into the hash function to generate a hash value. In such an example, the hashes of large pieces of data may be embedded within transactions, instead of the data itself. Readers will appreciate that, in other embodiments, alternatives to blockchains may be used to facilitate the decentralized storage of information. For example, one alternative to a blockchain that may be used is a blockweave. While conventional blockchains store every transaction to achieve validation, a blockweave permits secure decentralization without the usage of the entire chain, thereby enabling low cost on-chain storage of data. Such blockweaves may utilize a consensus mechanism that is based on proof of access (PoA) and proof of work (PoW).
The storage systems described above may, either alone or in combination with other computing devices, be used to support in-memory computing applications. In-memory computing involves the storage of information in RAM that is distributed across a cluster of computers. Readers will appreciate that the storage systems described above, especially those that are configurable with customizable amounts of processing resources, storage resources, and memory resources (e.g., those systems in which blades that contain configurable amounts of each type of resource), may be configured in a way so as to provide an infrastructure that can support in-memory computing. Likewise, the storage systems described above may include component parts (e.g., NVDIMMs, 3D crosspoint storage that provide fast random access memory that is persistent) that can actually provide for an improved in-memory computing environment as compared to in-memory computing environments that rely on RAM distributed across dedicated servers.
In some embodiments, the storage systems described above may be configured to operate as a hybrid in-memory computing environment that includes a universal interface to all storage media (e.g., RAM, flash storage, 3D crosspoint storage). In such embodiments, users may have no knowledge regarding the details of where their data is stored but they can still use the same full, unified API to address data. In such embodiments, the storage system may (in the background) move data to the fastest layer available—including intelligently placing the data in dependence upon various characteristics of the data or in dependence upon some other heuristic. In such an example, the storage systems may even make use of existing products such as Apache Ignite and GridGain to move data between the various storage layers, or the storage systems may make use of custom software to move data between the various storage layers. The storage systems described herein may implement various optimizations to improve the performance of in-memory computing such as, for example, having computations occur as close to the data as possible.
Readers will further appreciate that in some embodiments, the storage systems described above may be paired with other resources to support the applications described above. For example, one infrastructure could include primary compute in the form of servers and workstations which specialize in using General-purpose computing on graphics processing units (‘GPGPU’) to accelerate deep learning applications that are interconnected into a computation engine to train parameters for deep neural networks. Each system may have Ethernet external connectivity, InfiniBand external connectivity, some other form of external connectivity, or some combination thereof. In such an example, the GPUs can be grouped for a single large training or used independently to train multiple models. The infrastructure could also include a storage system such as those described above to provide, for example, a scale-out all-flash file or object store through which data can be accessed via high-performance protocols such as NFS, S3, and so on. The infrastructure can also include, for example, redundant top-of-rack Ethernet switches connected to storage and compute via ports in MLAG port channels for redundancy. The infrastructure could also include additional compute in the form of whitebox servers, optionally with GPUs, for data ingestion, pre-processing, and model debugging. Readers will appreciate that additional infrastructures are also be possible.
Readers will appreciate that the storage systems described above, either alone or in coordination with other computing machinery may be configured to support other AI related tools. For example, the storage systems may make use of tools like ONXX or other open neural network exchange formats that make it easier to transfer models written in different AI frameworks. Likewise, the storage systems may be configured to support tools like Amazon's Gluon that allow developers to prototype, build, and train deep learning models. In fact, the storage systems described above may be part of a larger platform, such as IBM™ Cloud Private for Data, that includes integrated data science, data engineering and application building services.
Readers will further appreciate that the storage systems described above may also be deployed as an edge solution. Such an edge solution may be in place to optimize cloud computing systems by performing data processing at the edge of the network, near the source of the data. Edge computing can push applications, data and computing power (i.e., services) away from centralized points to the logical extremes of a network. Through the use of edge solutions such as the storage systems described above, computational tasks may be performed using the compute resources provided by such storage systems, data may be storage using the storage resources of the storage system, and cloud-based services may be accessed through the use of various resources of the storage system (including networking resources). By performing computational tasks on the edge solution, storing data on the edge solution, and generally making use of the edge solution, the consumption of expensive cloud-based resources may be avoided and, in fact, performance improvements may be experienced relative to a heavier reliance on cloud-based resources.
While many tasks may benefit from the utilization of an edge solution, some particular uses may be especially suited for deployment in such an environment. For example, devices like drones, autonomous cars, robots, and others may require extremely rapid processing—so fast, in fact, that sending data up to a cloud environment and back to receive data processing support may simply be too slow. As an additional example, some IoT devices such as connected video cameras may not be well-suited for the utilization of cloud-based resources as it may be impractical (not only from a privacy perspective, security perspective, or a financial perspective) to send the data to the cloud simply because of the pure volume of data that is involved. As such, many tasks that really on data processing, storage, or communications may be better suited by platforms that include edge solutions such as the storage systems described above.
The storage systems described above may alone, or in combination with other computing resources, serves as a network edge platform that combines compute resources, storage resources, networking resources, cloud technologies and network virtualization technologies, and so on. As part of the network, the edge may take on characteristics similar to other network facilities, from the customer premise and backhaul aggregation facilities to Points of Presence (PoPs) and regional data centers. Readers will appreciate that network workloads, such as Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) and others, will reside on the network edge platform. Enabled by a combination of containers and virtual machines, the network edge platform may rely on controllers and schedulers that are no longer geographically co-located with the data processing resources. The functions, as microservices, may split into control planes, user and data planes, or even state machines, allowing for independent optimization and scaling techniques to be applied. Such user and data planes may be enabled through increased accelerators, both those residing in server platforms, such as FPGAs and Smart NICs, and through SDN-enabled merchant silicon and programmable ASICs.
The storage systems described above may also be optimized for use in big data analytics. Big data analytics may be generally described as the process of examining large and varied data sets to uncover hidden patterns, unknown correlations, market trends, customer preferences and other useful information that can help organizations make more-informed business decisions. As part of that process, semi-structured and unstructured data such as, for example, internet clickstream data, web server logs, social media content, text from customer emails and survey responses, mobile-phone call-detail records, IoT sensor data, and other data may be converted to a structured form.
The storage systems described above may also support (including implementing as a system interface) applications that perform tasks in response to human speech. For example, the storage systems may support the execution intelligent personal assistant applications such as, for example, Amazon's Alexa, Apple Siri, Google Voice, Samsung Bixby, Microsoft Cortana, and others. While the examples described in the previous sentence make use of voice as input, the storage systems described above may also support chatbots, talkbots, chatterbots, or artificial conversational entities or other applications that are configured to conduct a conversation via auditory or textual methods. Likewise, the storage system may actually execute such an application to enable a user such as a system administrator to interact with the storage system via speech. Such applications are generally capable of voice interaction, music playback, making to-do lists, setting alarms, streaming podcasts, playing audiobooks, and providing weather, traffic, and other real time information, such as news, although in embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure, such applications may be utilized as interfaces to various system management operations.
The storage systems described above may also implement AI platforms for delivering on the vision of self-driving storage. Such AI platforms may be configured to deliver global predictive intelligence by collecting and analyzing large amounts of storage system telemetry data points to enable effortless management, analytics and support. In fact, such storage systems may be capable of predicting both capacity and performance, as well as generating intelligent advice on workload deployment, interaction and optimization. Such AI platforms may be configured to scan all incoming storage system telemetry data against a library of issue fingerprints to predict and resolve incidents in real-time, before they impact customer environments, and captures hundreds of variables related to performance that are used to forecast performance load.
The storage systems described above may support the serialized or simultaneous execution of artificial intelligence applications, machine learning applications, data analytics applications, data transformations, and other tasks that collectively may form an AI ladder. Such an AI ladder may effectively be formed by combining such elements to form a complete data science pipeline, where exist dependencies between elements of the AI ladder. For example, AI may require that some form of machine learning has taken place, machine learning may require that some form of analytics has taken place, analytics may require that some form of data and information architecting has taken place, and so on. As such, each element may be viewed as a rung in an AI ladder that collectively can form a complete and sophisticated AI solution.
The storage systems described above may also, either alone or in combination with other computing environments, be used to deliver an AI everywhere experience where AI permeates wide and expansive aspects of business and life. For example, AI may play an important role in the delivery of deep learning solutions, deep reinforcement learning solutions, artificial general intelligence solutions, autonomous vehicles, cognitive computing solutions, commercial UAVs or drones, conversational user interfaces, enterprise taxonomies, ontology management solutions, machine learning solutions, smart dust, smart robots, smart workplaces, and many others.
The storage systems described above may also, either alone or in combination with other computing environments, be used to deliver a wide range of transparently immersive experiences (including those that use digital twins of various “things” such as people, places, processes, systems, and so on) where technology can introduce transparency between people, businesses, and things. Such transparently immersive experiences may be delivered as augmented reality technologies, connected homes, virtual reality technologies, brain-computer interfaces, human augmentation technologies, nanotube electronics, volumetric displays, 4D printing technologies, or others.
The storage systems described above may also, either alone or in combination with other computing environments, be used to support a wide variety of digital platforms. Such digital platforms can include, for example, 5G wireless systems and platforms, digital twin platforms, edge computing platforms, IoT platforms, quantum computing platforms, serverless PaaS, software-defined security, neuromorphic computing platforms, and so on.
The storage systems described above may also be part of a multi-cloud environment in which multiple cloud computing and storage services are deployed in a single heterogeneous architecture. In order to facilitate the operation of such a multi-cloud environment, DevOps tools may be deployed to enable orchestration across clouds. Likewise, continuous development and continuous integration tools may be deployed to standardize processes around continuous integration and delivery, new feature rollout and provisioning cloud workloads. By standardizing these processes, a multi-cloud strategy may be implemented that enables the utilization of the best provider for each workload.
The storage systems described above may be used as a part of a platform to enable the use of crypto-anchors that may be used to authenticate a product's origins and contents to ensure that it matches a blockchain record associated with the product. Similarly, as part of a suite of tools to secure data stored on the storage system, the storage systems described above may implement various encryption technologies and schemes, including lattice cryptography. Lattice cryptography can involve constructions of cryptographic primitives that involve lattices, either in the construction itself or in the security proof. Unlike public-key schemes such as the RSA, Diffie-Hellman or Elliptic-Curve cryptosystems, which are easily attacked by a quantum computer, some lattice-based constructions appear to be resistant to attack by both classical and quantum computers.
A quantum computer is a device that performs quantum computing. Quantum computing is computing using quantum-mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement. Quantum computers differ from traditional computers that are based on transistors, as such traditional computers require that data be encoded into binary digits (bits), each of which is always in one of two definite states (0 or 1). In contrast to traditional computers, quantum computers use quantum bits, which can be in superpositions of states. A quantum computer maintains a sequence of qubits, where a single qubit can represent a one, a zero, or any quantum superposition of those two qubit states. A pair of qubits can be in any quantum superposition of 4 states, and three qubits in any superposition of 8 states. A quantum computer with n qubits can generally be in an arbitrary superposition of up to 2{circumflex over ( )}n different states simultaneously, whereas a traditional computer can only be in one of these states at any one time. A quantum Turing machine is a theoretical model of such a computer.
The storage systems described above may also be paired with FPGA-accelerated servers as part of a larger AI or ML infrastructure. Such FPGA-accelerated servers may reside near (e.g., in the same data center) the storage systems described above or even incorporated into an appliance that includes one or more storage systems, one or more FPGA-accelerated servers, networking infrastructure that supports communications between the one or more storage systems and the one or more FPGA-accelerated servers, as well as other hardware and software components. Alternatively, FPGA-accelerated servers may reside within a cloud computing environment that may be used to perform compute-related tasks for AI and ML jobs. Any of the embodiments described above may be used to collectively serve as a FPGA-based AI or ML platform. Readers will appreciate that, in some embodiments of the FPGA-based AI or ML platform, the FPGAs that are contained within the FPGA-accelerated servers may be reconfigured for different types of ML models (e.g., LSTMs, CNNs, GRUs). The ability to reconfigure the FPGAs that are contained within the FPGA-accelerated servers may enable the acceleration of a ML or AI application based on the most optimal numerical precision and memory model being used. Readers will appreciate that by treating the collection of FPGA-accelerated servers as a pool of FPGAs, any CPU in the data center may utilize the pool of FPGAs as a shared hardware microservice, rather than limiting a server to dedicated accelerators plugged into it.
The FPGA-accelerated servers and the GPU-accelerated servers described above may implement a model of computing where, rather than keeping a small amount of data in a CPU and running a long stream of instructions over it as occurred in more traditional computing models, the machine learning model and parameters are pinned into the high-bandwidth on-chip memory with lots of data streaming though the high-bandwidth on-chip memory. FPGAs may even be more efficient than GPUs for this computing model, as the FPGAs can be programmed with only the instructions needed to run this kind of computing model.
The storage systems described above may be configured to provide parallel storage, for example, through the use of a parallel file system such as BeeGFS. Such parallel files systems may include a distributed metadata architecture. For example, the parallel file system may include a plurality of metadata servers across which metadata is distributed, as well as components that include services for clients and storage servers.
The systems described above can support the execution of a wide array of software applications. Such software applications can be deployed in a variety of ways, including container-based deployment models. Containerized applications may be managed using a variety of tools. For example, containerized applications may be managed using Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, and others. Containerized applications may be used to facilitate a serverless, cloud native computing deployment and management model for software applications. In support of a serverless, cloud native computing deployment and management model for software applications, containers may be used as part of an event handling mechanisms (e.g., AWS Lambdas) such that various events cause a containerized application to be spun up to operate as an event handler.
The systems described above may be deployed in a variety of ways, including being deployed in ways that support fifth generation (‘5G’) networks. 5G networks may support substantially faster data communications than previous generations of mobile communications networks and, as a consequence may lead to the disaggregation of data and computing resources as modern massive data centers may become less prominent and may be replaced, for example, by more-local, micro data centers that are close to the mobile-network towers. The systems described above may be included in such local, micro data centers and may be part of or paired to multi-access edge computing (‘MEC’) systems. Such MEC systems may enable cloud computing capabilities and an IT service environment at the edge of the cellular network. By running applications and performing related processing tasks closer to the cellular customer, network congestion may be reduced and applications may perform better.
The storage systems described above may also be configured to implement NVMe Zoned Namespaces. Through the use of NVMe Zoned Namespaces, the logical address space of a namespace is divided into zones. Each zone provides a logical block address range that must be written sequentially and explicitly reset before rewriting, thereby enabling the creation of namespaces that expose the natural boundaries of the device and offload management of internal mapping tables to the host. In order to implement NVMe Zoned Name Spaces (‘ZNS’), ZNS SSDs or some other form of zoned block devices may be utilized that expose a namespace logical address space using zones. With the zones aligned to the internal physical properties of the device, several inefficiencies in the placement of data can be eliminated. In such embodiments, each zone may be mapped, for example, to a separate application such that functions like wear leveling and garbage collection could be performed on a per-zone or per-application basis rather than across the entire device. In order to support ZNS, the storage controllers described herein may be configured with to interact with zoned block devices through the usage of, for example, the Linux™ kernel zoned block device interface or other tools.
The storage systems described above may also be configured to implement zoned storage in other ways such as, for example, through the usage of shingled magnetic recording (SMR) storage devices. In examples where zoned storage is used, device-managed embodiments may be deployed where the storage devices hide this complexity by managing it in the firmware, presenting an interface like any other storage device. Alternatively, zoned storage may be implemented via a host-managed embodiment that depends on the operating system to know how to handle the drive, and only write sequentially to certain regions of the drive. Zoned storage may similarly be implemented using a host-aware embodiment in which a combination of a drive managed and host managed implementation is deployed.
For further explanation,
Communication interface 352 may be configured to communicate with one or more computing devices. Examples of communication interface 352 include, without limitation, a wired network interface (such as a network interface card), a wireless network interface (such as a wireless network interface card), a modem, an audio/video connection, and any other suitable interface.
Processor 354 generally represents any type or form of processing unit capable of processing data and/or interpreting, executing, and/or directing execution of one or more of the instructions, processes, and/or operations described herein. Processor 354 may perform operations by executing computer-executable instructions 362 (e.g., an application, software, code, and/or other executable data instance) stored in storage device 356.
Storage device 356 may include one or more data storage media, devices, or configurations and may employ any type, form, and combination of data storage media and/or device. For example, storage device 356 may include, but is not limited to, any combination of the non-volatile media and/or volatile media described herein. Electronic data, including data described herein, may be temporarily and/or permanently stored in storage device 356. For example, data representative of computer-executable instructions 362 configured to direct processor 354 to perform any of the operations described herein may be stored within storage device 356. In some examples, data may be arranged in one or more databases residing within storage device 356.
I/O module 358 may include one or more I/O modules configured to receive user input and provide user output. I/O module 358 may include any hardware, firmware, software, or combination thereof supportive of input and output capabilities. For example, I/O module 358 may include hardware and/or software for capturing user input, including, but not limited to, a keyboard or keypad, a touchscreen component (e.g., touchscreen display), a receiver (e.g., an RF or infrared receiver), motion sensors, and/or one or more input buttons.
I/O module 358 may include one or more devices for presenting output to a user, including, but not limited to, a graphics engine, a display (e.g., a display screen), one or more output drivers (e.g., display drivers), one or more audio speakers, and one or more audio drivers. In certain embodiments, I/O module 358 is configured to provide graphical data to a display for presentation to a user. The graphical data may be representative of one or more graphical user interfaces and/or any other graphical content as may serve a particular implementation. In some examples, any of the systems, computing devices, and/or other components described herein may be implemented by computing device 350.
The storage systems described above may, either alone or in combination, by configured to serve as a continuous data protection store. A continuous data protection store is a feature of a storage system that records updates to a dataset in such a way that consistent images of prior contents of the dataset can be accessed with a low time granularity (often on the order of seconds, or even less), and stretching back for a reasonable period of time (often hours or days). These allow access to very recent consistent points in time for the dataset, and also allow access to access to points in time for a dataset that might have just preceded some event that, for example, caused parts of the dataset to be corrupted or otherwise lost, while retaining close to the maximum number of updates that preceded that event. Conceptually, they are like a sequence of snapshots of a dataset taken very frequently and kept for a long period of time, though continuous data protection stores are often implemented quite differently from snapshots. A storage system implementing a data continuous data protection store may further provide a means of accessing these points in time, accessing one or more of these points in time as snapshots or as cloned copies, or reverting the dataset back to one of those recorded points in time.
Over time, to reduce overhead, some points in the time held in a continuous data protection store can be merged with other nearby points in time, essentially deleting some of these points in time from the store. This can reduce the capacity needed to store updates. It may also be possible to convert a limited number of these points in time into longer duration snapshots. For example, such a store might keep a low granularity sequence of points in time stretching back a few hours from the present, with some points in time merged or deleted to reduce overhead for up to an additional day. Stretching back in the past further than that, some of these points in time could be converted to snapshots representing consistent point-in-time images from only every few hours.
Although some embodiments are described largely in the context of a storage system, readers of skill in the art will recognize that embodiments of the present disclosure may also take the form of a computer program product disposed upon computer readable storage media for use with any suitable processing system. Such computer readable storage media may be any storage medium for machine-readable information, including magnetic media, optical media, solid-state media, or other suitable media. Examples of such media include magnetic disks in hard drives or diskettes, compact disks for optical drives, magnetic tape, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Persons skilled in the art will immediately recognize that any computer system having suitable programming means will be capable of executing the steps described herein as embodied in a computer program product. Persons skilled in the art will recognize also that, although some of the embodiments described in this specification are oriented to software installed and executing on computer hardware, nevertheless, alternative embodiments implemented as firmware or as hardware are well within the scope of the present disclosure.
In some examples, a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions may be provided in accordance with the principles described herein. The instructions, when executed by a processor of a computing device, may direct the processor and/or computing device to perform one or more operations, including one or more of the operations described herein. Such instructions may be stored and/or transmitted using any of a variety of known computer-readable media.
A non-transitory computer-readable medium as referred to herein may include any non-transitory storage medium that participates in providing data (e.g., instructions) that may be read and/or executed by a computing device (e.g., by a processor of a computing device). For example, a non-transitory computer-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, any combination of non-volatile storage media and/or volatile storage media. Exemplary non-volatile storage media include, but are not limited to, read-only memory, flash memory, a solid-state drive, a magnetic storage device (e.g. a hard disk, a floppy disk, magnetic tape, etc.), ferroelectric random-access memory (“RAM”), and an optical disc (e.g., a compact disc, a digital video disc, a Blu-ray disc, etc.). Exemplary volatile storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM (e.g., dynamic RAM).
Advantages and features of the present disclosure can be further described by the following statements:
Referring to
It is noted that in alternative embodiments, the number and type of client computers and servers, switches, networks, data storage arrays, and data storage devices is not limited to those shown in
In the network architecture 400, each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b may be used for the sharing of data among different servers and computers, such as client computer systems 410a-410c. In addition, the data storage arrays 420a-420b may be used for disk mirroring, backup and restore, archival and retrieval of archived data, and data migration from one storage device to another. In an alternate embodiment, one or more client computer systems 410a-410c may be linked to one another through fast local area networks (LANs) in order to form a cluster. Such clients may share a storage resource, such as a cluster shared volume residing within one of data storage arrays 420a-420b.
Each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b includes a storage subsystem 470 for data storage. Storage subsystem 470 may comprise a plurality of storage devices 476a-476m. These storage devices 476a-476m may provide data storage services to client computer systems 410a-410c. Each of the storage devices 476a-476m uses a particular technology and mechanism for performing data storage. The type of technology and mechanism used within each of the storage devices 476a-476m may at least in part be used to determine the algorithms used for controlling and scheduling read and write operations to and from each of the storage devices 476a-476m. The logic used in these algorithms may be included in one or more of a base operating system (OS) 416, a file system 440, one or more global I/O schedulers 478 within a storage subsystem controller 474, control logic 930 within each of the storage devices 476a-476m, or otherwise. Additionally, the logic, algorithms, and control mechanisms described herein may comprise hardware and/or software.
Each of the storage devices 476a-476m may be configured to receive read and write requests and comprise a plurality of data storage locations, each data storage location being addressable as rows and columns in an array. In one embodiment, the data storage locations within the storage devices 476a-476m may be arranged into logical, redundant storage containers or RAID arrays (redundant arrays of inexpensive/independent disks). In some embodiments, each of the storage devices 476a-476m may utilize technology for data storage that is different from a conventional hard disk drive (HDD). For example, one or more of the storage devices 476a-476m may include or be further coupled to storage consisting of solid-state memory to store persistent data. In other embodiments, one or more of the storage devices 476a-476m may include or be further coupled to storage using other technologies such as spin torque transfer technique, magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM) technique, shingled disks, memristors, phase change memory, or other storage technologies. These different storage techniques and technologies may lead to differing I/O characteristics between storage devices.
In one embodiment, the included solid-state memory comprises solid-state drive (SSD) technology. Typically, SSD technology utilizes Flash memory cells. As is well known in the art, a Flash memory cell holds a binary value based on a range of electrons trapped and stored in a floating gate. A fully erased Flash memory cell stores no or a minimal number of electrons in the floating gate. A particular binary value, such as binary 1 for single-level cell (SLC) Flash, is associated with an erased Flash memory cell. A multi-level cell (MLC) Flash has a binary value 11 associated with an erased Flash memory cell. After applying a voltage higher than a given threshold voltage to a controlling gate within a Flash memory cell, the Flash memory cell traps a given range of electrons in the floating gate. Accordingly, another particular binary value, such as binary 0 for SLC Flash, is associated with the programmed (written) Flash memory cell. A MLC Flash cell may have one of multiple binary values associated with the programmed memory cell depending on the voltage applied to the control gate.
The differences in technology and mechanisms between HDD technology and SDD technology may lead to differences in input/output (I/O) characteristics of the data storage devices 476a-476m. Generally speaking, SSD technologies provide lower read access latency times than HDD technologies. However, the write performance of SSDs is generally slower than the read performance and may be significantly impacted by the availability of free, programmable blocks within the SSD. As the write performance of SSDs is significantly slower compared to the read performance of SSDs, problems may occur with certain functions or operations expecting latencies similar to reads. Additionally, scheduling may be made more difficult by long write latencies that affect read latencies. Accordingly, different algorithms may be used for I/O scheduling in each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b.
In one embodiment, where different types of operations such as read and write operations have different latencies, algorithms for I/O scheduling may segregate these operations and handle them separately for purposes of scheduling. For example, within one or more of the storage devices 476a-476m, write operations may be batched by the devices themselves, such as by storing them in an internal cache. When these caches reach a given occupancy threshold, or at some other time, the corresponding storage devices 476a-476m may flush the cache. In general, these cache flushes may introduce added latencies to read and/or writes at unpredictable times, which leads to difficulty in effectively scheduling operations. Therefore, an I/O scheduler may utilize characteristics of a storage device, such as the size of the cache or a measured idle time, in order to predict when such a cache flush may occur. Knowing characteristics of each of the one or more storage devices 476a-476m may lead to more effective I/O scheduling. In one embodiment, the global I/O scheduler 478 may detect a given device of the one or more of the storage devices 476a-476m is exhibiting long response times for I/O requests at unpredicted times. In response, the global I/O scheduler 478 may schedule a given operation to the given device in order to cause the device to resume exhibiting expected behaviors. In one embodiment, such an operation may be a cache flush command, a trim command, an erase command, or otherwise. Further details concerning I/O scheduling will be discussed below.
Components of a Network Architecture
Again, as shown, network architecture 400 includes client computer systems 410a-410c interconnected through networks 480 and 490 to one another and to data storage arrays 420a-420b. Networks 480 and 490 may include a variety of techniques including wireless connection, direct local area network (LAN) connections, wide area network (WAN) connections such as the Internet, a router, storage area network, Ethernet, and others. Networks 480 and 490 may comprise one or more LANs that may also be wireless. Networks 480 and 490 may further include remote direct memory access (RDMA) hardware and/or software, transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) hardware and/or software, router, repeaters, switches, grids, and/or others. Protocols such as Fibre Channel, Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), iSCSI, and so forth may be used in networks 480 and 490. Switch 440 may utilize a protocol associated with both networks 480 and 490. The network 490 may interface with a set of communications protocols used for the Internet 460 such as the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the Internet Protocol (IP), or TCP/IP. Switch 450 may be a TCP/IP switch.
Client computer systems 410a-410c are representative of any number of stationary or mobile computers such as desktop personal computers (PCs), servers, server farms, workstations, laptops, handheld computers, servers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), smart phones, and so forth. Generally speaking, client computer systems 410a-410c include one or more processors comprising one or more processor cores. Each processor core includes circuitry for executing instructions according to a predefined general-purpose instruction set. For example, the x86 instruction set architecture may be selected. Alternatively, the Alpha®, PowerPC®, SPARC®, or any other general-purpose instruction set architecture may be selected. The processor cores may access cache memory subsystems for data and computer program instructions. The cache subsystems may be coupled to a memory hierarchy comprising random access memory (RAM) and a storage device.
Each processor core and memory hierarchy within a client computer system may be connected to a network interface. In addition to hardware components, each of the client computer systems 410a-410c may include a base operating system (OS) stored within the memory hierarchy. The base OS may be representative of any of a variety of operating systems, such as, for example, MS-DOS®, MS-WINDOWS®, OS/2®, UNIX®, Linux®, Solaris®, AIX®, DART, or otherwise. As such, the base OS may be operable to provide various services to the end-user and provide a software framework operable to support the execution of various programs. Additionally, each of the client computer systems 410a-410c may include a hypervisor used to support virtual machines (VMs). As is well known to those skilled in the art, virtualization may be used in desktops and servers to fully or partially decouple software, such as an OS, from a system's hardware. Virtualization may provide an end-user with an illusion of multiple OSes running on a same machine each having its own resources and access to logical storage entities (e.g., LUNs) built upon the storage devices 476a-476m within each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b.
Each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b may be used for the sharing of data among different servers, such as the client computer systems 410a-410c. Each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b includes a storage subsystem 470 for data storage. Storage subsystem 470 may comprise a plurality of storage devices 476a-476m. Each of these storage devices 476a-476m may be an SSD. A controller 474 may comprise logic for handling received read/write requests. For example, the algorithms briefly described above may be executed in at least controller 474. A random-access memory (RAM) 472 may be used to batch operations, such as received write requests. In various embodiments, when batching write operations (or other operations) non-volatile storage (e.g., NVRAM) may be used.
The base OS 432, the file system 434, any OS drivers (not shown) and other software stored in memory medium 430 may provide functionality providing access to files and the management of these functionalities. The base OS 434 and the OS drivers may comprise program instructions stored on the memory medium 430 and executable by processor 422 to perform one or more memory access operations in storage subsystem 470 that correspond to received requests. The system shown in
Each of the data storage arrays 420a-420b may use a network interface 424 to connect to network 480. Similar to client computer systems 410a-410c, in one embodiment, the functionality of network interface 424 may be included on a network adapter card. The functionality of network interface 424 may be implemented using both hardware and software. Both a random-access memory (RAM) and a read-only memory (ROM) may be included on a network card implementation of network interface 424. One or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) may be used to provide the functionality of network interface 424.
In one embodiment, a data storage model may be developed which seeks to optimize I/O performance. In one embodiment, the model is based at least in part on characteristics of the storage devices within a storage system. For example, in a storage system which utilizes solid state storage technologies, characteristics of the particular devices may be used to develop models for the devices, which may in turn serve to inform corresponding I/O scheduling algorithms. For example, if particular storage devices being used exhibit write latencies that are relatively high compared to read latencies, such a characteristic may be accounted for in scheduling operations. It is noted that what is considered relatively high or low may vary depending upon the given system, the types of data being processed, the amount of data processed, the timing of data, or otherwise. Generally speaking, the system is programmable to determine what constitutes a low or high latency, and/or what constitutes a significant difference between the two.
Generally speaking, any model which is developed for devices, or a computing system, will be incomplete. Often, there are simply too many variables to account for in a real world system to completely model a given system. In some cases, it may be possible to develop models which are not complete but which are nevertheless valuable. As discussed more fully below, embodiments are described wherein storage devices are modeled based upon characteristics of the devices. In various embodiments, I/O scheduling is performed based on certain predictions as to how the devices may behave. Based upon an understanding of the characteristics of the devices, certain device behaviors are more predictable than others. In order to more effectively schedule operations for optimal I/O performance, greater control over the behavior of the system is desired. Device behaviors which are unexpected, or unpredictable, make it more difficult to schedule operations. Therefore, algorithms are developed which seek to minimize unpredictable or unexpected behavior in the system.
For example, if it is desired to optimize read response times, it may be possible to schedule reads so that they are serviced in a more timely manner if other behaviors of the system are relatively predictable. On the other hand, if system behavior is relatively unpredictable, then a level of confidence in an ability to schedule those reads to provide results when desired is diminished. Block 510 illustrates a scenario in which system behavior (the smaller circle) is not aligned with that of the model of that system (the larger circle). In this case, the system is exhibiting behaviors which fall outside of the model. Consequently, system behavior is less predictable and scheduling of operations may become less effective. For example, if solid state memory devices are used in the storage system, and these devices may initiate actions on their own which cause the devices to service requests with greater (or otherwise unexpected) latencies, then any operations which were scheduled for that device may also experience greater or unexpected latencies. One example of such a device operation is an internal cache flush.
In order to address the problem of unexpected or unscheduled system behaviors and corresponding variable performance, the model which is developed may include actions which it may take to restore the system to a less uncertain state. In other words, should the system begin exhibiting behaviors which degrade the model's ability to predict the system's behavior, the model has built into it certain actions it can take to restore the system to a state wherein the particular unexpected behavior is eliminated or rendered less likely. In the example shown, an action 512 is shown which seeks to “move” the system to a state more closely aligned with the model. The action 512 may be termed a “reactive” action or operation as it is performed in response to detecting the system behavior which is outside of the model. Subsequent to performing the action 512, a more ideal state 520 may be achieved.
While developing a model which can react to unpredictable behaviors to move the system to a more ideal state is desirable, the existence of those unpredictable behaviors may still interfere with effective scheduling operations. Therefore, it would be desirable to minimize the occurrence of the unexpected behaviors or events. In one embodiment, a model is developed which includes actions or operations designed to prevent or reduce the occurrence of unexpected behaviors. These actions may be termed “proactive” actions or operations as they may generally be performed proactively in order to prevent the occurrence of some behavior or event, or change the timing of some behavior or event. Block 530 in
Referring now to
In block 602, an I/O scheduler schedules read and write operations for one or more storage devices. In various embodiments, the I/O scheduler may maintain a separate queue (either physically or logically) for each storage device. In addition, the I/O scheduler may include a separate queue for each operation type supported by a corresponding storage device. For example, an I/O scheduler may maintain at least a separate read queue and a separate write queue for an SSD. In block 604, the I/O scheduler may monitor the behavior of the one or more storage devices. In one embodiment, the I/O scheduler may include a model of a corresponding storage device (e.g., a behavioral type model and/or algorithms based at least in part on a model of the device) and receive state data from the storage device to input to the model. The model within the I/O scheduler may both model and predict behavior of the storage device by utilizing known and/or observed characteristics of the storage device.
The I/O scheduler may detect characteristics of a given storage device which affect, or may affect, I/O performance. For example, as will be discussed further below, various characteristics and states of devices, and of I/O traffic, may be maintained. By observing these characteristics and states, the I/O scheduler may predict that a given device may soon enter a state wherein it exhibits high I/O latency behavior. For example, in one embodiment, the I/O scheduler may detect or predict that an internal cache flush is about to occur within a storage device which may affect the response times of requests to the storage device. For example, in one embodiment, a storage device that sits idle for a given amount of time may flush its internal cache. In some embodiments, whether a given device is idle may be based on a perspective external to the device. For example, if an operation has not been scheduled for a device for a period of time, the device may be deemed to be idle for approximately that period of time. In such an embodiment, the device could in fact be busy based on internally initiated activity within the device. However, such internally initiated activity would not be considered in determining whether the device is idle. In other embodiments, internally initiated activities of a device could be considered when determining whether a device is idle or busy. By observing the behavior of the device, and noting it has been idle for a given amount of time, the scheduler may predict when an internal cache flush might occur. In other embodiments, the scheduler may also have the ability to poll devices to determine various states or conditions of the devices. In any event, the scheduler may be configured to determine the potential for unscheduled behaviors such as internal cache flushes and initiate a proactive operation in order to prevent the behavior from occurring. In this manner, the scheduler controls the timing of events in the device, and the system, and is better able to schedule operations.
Various characteristics may be used to as a basis for making predictions regarding device behavior. In various embodiments, the scheduler may maintain a status of currently pending operations and/or a history of recent operations corresponding to the storage devices. In some embodiments, the I/O scheduler may know the size of a cache within a device and/or the caching policies and maintain a count of a number of write requests sent to the storage device. In other embodiments, other mechanisms may be available for determining the state of a cache within a device (e.g., direct polling type access to the device). In addition, the I/O scheduler may track the amount of data in write requests sent to the storage device. The I/O scheduler may then detect when either a number of write requests or a total amount of data corresponding to the write requests reaches a given threshold. If the I/O scheduler detects such a condition (conditional block 606), then in block 608, the I/O scheduler may schedule a particular operation for the device. Such an operation may generally correspond to the above described proactive operations. For example, the I/O scheduler may place a cache flush command in a corresponding queue to force the storage device to perform a cache flush at a time of the scheduler's choosing. Alternatively, the I/O scheduler may place a dummy read operation in the queue in order to determine whether or not any cache flush on the storage device has completed. Still further, the scheduler could query a device to obtain status information (e.g., idle, busy, etc.). These and other characteristics and operations are possible and are contemplated. In addition, in various embodiments proactive operations may be scheduled when reconditioning an SSD in place. In such an embodiment, the SSD firmware and/or mapping tables may get into a state where requests hang or are permanently slow. It may be possible to just reset the drive or power the drive off and on to unclog the firmware. However if the condition is permanent (i.e. a bug in the firmware that can't handle the current state of the mapping tables) another way to fix it is to reformat the drive to completely clean and reset the FTL and then repopulate it or reuse it for something other data.
The actions described above may be performed to prevent or reduce a number of occurrences of unpredicted variable response times. Simultaneously, the I/O scheduler may detect the occurrence of any variable behavior of a given storage device at an unpredicted time. If the I/O scheduler detects such a condition (conditional block 610), then in block 612, the I/O scheduler may place an operation in a corresponding queue of the storage device. In this case, the operation may generally correspond to the above described reactive operations. The operation may be used both to reduce the amount of time the storage device provides variable behavior and to detect the end of the variant behavior. In various embodiments, proactive and/or reactive operations may generally include any operation capable of placing a device into (at least in part) a known state. For example, initiating a cache flush operation may result in the device achieving an empty cache state. A device with a cache that is empty may be less likely to initiate an internal cache flush than a device whose cache is not empty. Some examples of proactive and/or reactive operations include cache flush operations, erase operations, secure erase operations, trim operations, sleep operations, hibernate operations, powering on and off, and reset operations.
Referring now to
For random read and write requests, an SSD typically demonstrates better performance than a HDD. However, an SSD typically exhibits worse performance for random write requests than read requests due to the characteristics of an SSD. Unlike an HDD, the relative latencies of read and write requests are quite different, with write requests typically taking significantly longer than read requests because it takes longer to program a Flash memory cell than read it. In addition, the latency of write operations can be quite variable due to additional operations that need to be performed as part of the write. For example, an erase operation may be performed prior to a write or program operation for a Flash memory cell, which is already modified. Additionally, an erase operation may be performed on a block-wise basis. In such a case, all of the Flash memory cells within a block (an erase segment) are erased together. Because a block is relatively large and comprises multiple pages, the operation may take a relatively long time. Alternatively, the FTL may remap a block into an already erased erase block. In either case, the additional operations associated with performing a write operation may cause writes to have a significantly higher variability in latency as well as a significantly higher latency than reads. Other storage device types may exhibit different characteristics based on request type. In addition to the above, certain storage devices may offer poor and/or variable performance if read and write requests are mixed. Therefore, in order to improve performance, various embodiments may segregate read and write requests. It is noted that while the discussion generally speaks of read and write operations in particular, the systems and methods described herein may be applied to other operations as well. In such other embodiments, other relatively high and low latency operations may be identified as such and segregated for scheduling purposes. Additionally, in some embodiments reads and writes may be categorized as a first type of operation, while other operations such as cache flushes and trim operations may be categorized as corresponding to a second type of operation. Various combinations are possible and are contemplated.
In block 702, an I/O scheduler may receive and buffer I/O requests for a given storage device of one or more storage devices. In block 704, low-latency I/O requests may generally be issued to the storage device in preference to high latency requests. For example, depending on the storage technology used by the storage devices, read requests may have lower latencies than write requests and other command types and may issue first. Consequently, write requests may be accumulated while read requests are given issue priority (i.e., are conveyed to the device ahead of write requests). At some point in time, the I/O scheduler may stop issuing read requests to the device and begin issuing write requests. In one embodiment, the write requests may be issued as a stream of multiple writes. Therefore, the overhead associated with a write request may be amortized over multiple write requests. In this manner, high latency requests (e.g., write requests) and low latency requests (e.g., read requests) may be segregated and handled separately.
In block 706, the I/O scheduler may determine whether a particular condition exists which indicates high latency requests should be conveyed to a device(s). For example, in one embodiment detecting such a condition may comprise detecting a given number of high latency I/O requests, or an amount of corresponding data, has accumulated and reached a given threshold. Alternatively, a rate of high latency requests being received may reach some threshold. Numerous such conditions are possible and are contemplated. In one embodiment, the high-latency requests may be write requests. If such a condition occurs (conditional block 708), then in block 710, the I/O scheduler may begin issuing high-latency I/O requests to the given storage device. The number of such requests issued may vary depending upon a given algorithm. The number could correspond to a fixed or programmable number of writes, or an amount of data. Alternatively, writes could be issued for a given period of time. For example, the period of time may last until a particular condition ceases to exist (e.g., a rate of received writes falls), or a particular condition occurs. Alternatively, combinations of any of the above may be used in determining when to begin and when to stop issuing high latency requests to the device(s). In some embodiments, the first read request after a stream of write requests may be relatively slow compared to other read requests. In order to avoid scheduling a “genuine” read requests in the issue slot immediately following a stream of write requests, the I/O scheduler may be configured to automatically schedule a “dummy” read following the stream of write requests. In this context a “genuine” read is a read for which data is requested by a user or application, and a “dummy” read is an artificially created read whose data may simply be discarded. In various embodiments, until the dummy read is detected as finished, the write requests may not be determined to have completed. Also, in various embodiments, a cache flush may follow a stream of writes and be used to determine when the writes have completed.
Referring now to
In block 802, one or more storage devices may be selected to be used in a storage subsystem. In block 804, various characteristics for each device may be identified such as cache sizes, typical read and write response times, storage topology, an age of the device, and so forth. In block 806, one or more characteristics which affect I/O performance for a given storage device may be identified.
In block 808, one or more actions which affect the timing and/or occurrences of the characteristics for a given device may be determined. Examples may include a cache flush and execution of given operations such as an erase operation for an SSD. For example, a force operation such as a cache flush may reduce the occurrence of variable response times of an SSD at unpredicted times. In block 810, a model may be developed for each of the one or more selected devices based on corresponding characteristics and actions. This model may be used in software, such as within an I/O scheduler within a storage controller.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In block 1202, an I/O scheduler may monitor the behavior of each one of the storage devices. Conditional blocks 1204-1208 illustrate one embodiment of detecting characteristics of a given device which may affect I/O performance as described above regarding conditional step 606 of method 600. In one embodiment, if the I/O scheduler detects a given device exceeds a given idle time (conditional block 1204) or detects a corresponding cache exceeds an occupancy threshold (conditional block 1206) or detects a cached data exceeds a data age threshold (conditional block 1208), then in block 1210, the I/O scheduler may issue a force (proactive) operation to the given storage device. In such a case, the scheduler may predict that an internal cache flush will occur soon and at an unpredictable time. In order to avoid occurrence of such an event, the I/O scheduler proactively schedules an operation to avert the event.
It is noted that aversion of an event as described above may mean the event does not occur, or does not occur at an unpredicted or unexpected time. In other words, the scheduler generally prefers that given events occur according to the scheduler's timing and not otherwise. In this sense, a long latency event occurring because the scheduler scheduled the event is better than such an event occurring unexpectedly. Timers and counters within the scheduling logic 920 may be used in combination with the monitor 910 to perform at least these detections. One example of a force operation issued to the given storage device may include a cache flush. Another example of a force operation may include an erase request. A force operation may be sent from the I/O scheduler to a corresponding queue in the device queue 1010 within a corresponding device unit 900 as part of the scheduling.
Referring now to
In block 1302, an Amount of redundancy in a RAID architecture for a storage subsystem may be determined to be used within a given device group 473. For example, for a 4+2 RAID group, 2 of the storage devices may be used to store erasure correcting code (ECC) information, such as parity information. This information may be used as part of reconstruct read requests. In one embodiment, the reconstruct read requests may be used during normal I/O scheduling to improve performance of a device group while a number of storage devices are detected to be exhibiting variable I/O response times. In block 1304, a maximum number of devices which may be concurrently busy, or exhibiting variable response time, within a device group is determined. This maximum number may be referred to as the Target number. In one embodiment, the storage devices are SSDs which may exhibit variable response times due to executing write requests, erase requests, or cache flushes. In one embodiment, the target number is selected such that a reconstruct read can still be performed.
In one embodiment, an I/O scheduler may detect a condition which warrants raising the Target number to a level where a reconstruct read is no longer efficient. For example, a number of pending write requests for a given device may reach a waiting threshold (i.e., the write requests have been pending for a significant period of time and it is determined they should wait no longer). Alternatively, a given number of write requests may be detected which have a relatively high-priority which cannot be accumulated for later issuance as discussed above. If the I/O scheduler detects such a condition (conditional block 1306), then in block 1308, the I/O scheduler may increment or decrement the Target based on the one or more detected conditions. For example, the I/O scheduler may allow the Target to exceed the Amount of supported redundancy if an appropriate number of high-priority write requests are pending, or some other condition occurs. In block 1310, the I/O scheduler may determine N storage devices within the device group are exhibiting variable I/O response times. If N is greater than Target (conditional block 1312), then in block 1314, the storage devices may be scheduled in a manner to reduce N. Otherwise, in block 1316, the I/O scheduler may schedule requests in a manner to improve performance. For example, the I/O scheduler may take advantage of the capability of reconstruct read requests as described further below.
Referring now to
In block 1402, an I/O scheduler may determine to reduce a number N of storage devices within a storage subsystem executing high-latency operations which cause variable response times at unpredicted times. In block 1404, the I/O scheduler may select a given device executing high-latency operations. In block 1406, the I/O scheduler may halt the execution of the high-latency operations on the given device and decrement N. For example, the I/O scheduler may stop issuing write requests and erase requests to the given storage device. In addition, the corresponding I/O scheduler may halt execution of issued write requests and erase requests. In block 1408, the I/O scheduler may initiate execution of low-latency operations on the given device, such as read requests. These read requests may include reconstruct read requests. In this manner, the device leaves a long latency response state and N is reduced.
Turning now to
The method of
Generally speaking, whether or not a reconstruct read is imitated may be based upon a cost benefit analysis which compares the costs associated with performing the reconstruct read with the (potential) benefits of obtaining the results of the reconstruct read. For example, if a response to an original read request in a given device is not received within a given period of time, it may be predicted that the device is performing an operation that will result in a latency that exceeds that of a reconstruct read were one to be initiated. Therefore, a reconstruct read may be initiated. Such an action may be taken to (for example) maintain a given level of read service performance. It is noted that other factors may be considered as well when determining whether to initiate a reconstruct read, such as current load, types of requests being received, priority of requests, the state of other devices in the system, various characteristics as described in
In view of the above, the I/O scheduler may then determine whether a reconstruct read corresponding to the original read is to be initiated (decision block 1502). The reconstruct read would generally entail one or more reads serviced by devices other than the first device. In determining whether a reconstruct read is to be initiated, many factors may be taken into account. Generally speaking, the I/O scheduler engages in a cost/benefit analysis to determine whether it is “better” to service the original read with the first device, or service the original read by issuing a reconstruct read. What is “better” in a given situation may vary, and may be programmable. For example, an algorithm may be such that it always favors faster read response times. In such a case, a determination may be made as to whether servicing of the reconstruct read can complete prior to servicing of the original read by the original device. Alternatively, an algorithm may determine that a reduced system load is favored at a given time. In such a case, the I/O scheduler may choose not to initiate a reconstruct read with its additional overhead—even if the reconstruct read may complete faster than the original read. Still further, a more nuanced balancing of speed versus overhead may be used in such determinations. In various embodiments, the algorithm may be programmable with an initial weighting (e.g., always prefer speed irrespective of loading). Such a weighting could be constant, or could be programmable to vary dynamically according to various conditions. For example, conditions could include time of day, a rate of received I/O requests, the priority of a received request, whether a particular task is detected (e.g., a backup operation is currently being performed), detection of a failure, and so on.
If the scheduler decides not to initiate a reconstruct read, then the read may be serviced by the originally targeted device (block 1503). Alternatively, a reconstruct read may be initiated (block 1504). In one embodiment, the other devices which are selected for servicing the reconstruct read are those which are identified as exhibiting non-variable behavior. By selecting devices which are exhibiting non-variable behavior (i.e., more predictable behavior), the I/O scheduler is better able to predict how long it may take to service the reconstruct read. In addition to the given variable/non-variable behavior of a device, the I/O scheduler may also take in to consideration other aspects of each device. For example, in selecting a particular device for servicing a reconstruct read, the I/O scheduler may also evaluate a number of outstanding requests for a given device (e.g., how full is the device queue), the priority of requests currently pending for a given device, the expected processing speed of the device itself (e.g., some devices may represent an older or otherwise inherently slower technology than other devices), and so on. Further, the scheduler may desire to schedule the reconstruct read in such a way that the corresponding results from each of the devices is returned at approximately the same time. In such a case, the scheduler may disfavor a particular device for servicing a reconstruct read if it is predicted its processing time would differ significantly from the other devices—even if it were much faster than the other devices. Numerous such factors and conditions to consider are possible and are contemplated.
In one embodiment, the reconstruct read requests may inherit a priority level of the original read request. In other embodiments, the reconstruct read requests may have priorities that differ from the original read request. If the I/O scheduler detects a selected second (other) device receiving a corresponding reconstruct read request is now exhibiting variable response time behavior (conditional block 1505) and this second device is predicted to remain variable until after the first device is predicted to become non-variable (conditional block 1506), then in block 1508, the I/O scheduler may issue the original read request to the first device. In one embodiment, timers may be used to predict when a storage device exhibiting variable response times may again provide non-variable response times. Control flow of method 1500 moves from block 1508 to conditional block 1512 via block C. If the second device is not predicted to remain variable longer than the first device (conditional block 1506), then control flow of method 1500 moves to block 1510. In block 1510, the read request is serviced by the issued reconstruct read requests.
If the I/O scheduler detects the given variable device becomes non-variable (conditional block 1512), then in block 1514, the I/O scheduler issues the original read request to the given device. The I/O scheduler may designate the given device as non-variable and decrement N (the number of storage devices detected to provide variable I/O response times). If the original read request finishes before the alternate reconstruct read requests (conditional block 1516), then in block 1518, the I/O scheduler services the read request with the original read request. In various embodiments, the scheduler may remove the rebuild read requests. Alternatively, the reconstruct read requests may complete and their data may simply be discarded. Otherwise, in block 1520, the I/O scheduler services the read request with the reconstruct read requests and may remove the original read request (or discard its returned data).
Storage devices of a storage system, such as the storage devices of the storage systems described at
In a storage system having multiple storage controllers or authorities that are each independently sending access requests to the storage devices, the limited number of access operations can lead to contention at the physical units of the storage device. For example, if four authorities each send an access request to the same die of a storage device, and the die is only capable of performing three access operations in parallel with one another, then there is contention at the die between the four authorities. Accordingly, while three of the access operations are being performed for three of the authorities, the remaining authority's access operation will not be performed until one of the other access operations is complete, decreasing the performance of the storage system.
This issue is compounded by storage systems that utilize different programming modes that have differing associated latencies. As previously described, data can be stored at the physical units of the storage device using different programming mode. The different programming modes may have different characteristics, such as storage density, data resiliency, and latency. For example, data that is programmed to a physical unit of the storage device in SLC mode has a lower latency than data that is programmed to a physical unit of the storage device in QLC mode. In other words, access operations that are associated with a low latency operation, such as data programmed using SLC mode, may be performed more quickly than access operations that are associated with a higher latency operation, such as data programmed using QLC mode. Accordingly, if low latency access operations and higher latency access operations are sent to the same physical unit, the higher latency access operations (which take longer to complete than the low latency operations) may cause physical unit contention and delay the performance of the low latency access operations, mitigating the improved performance of these low latency access operations relative to these higher latency operations and decreasing the performance of the storage system.
Aspects of the present disclosure remedy the above and other deficiencies by optimizing access to the physical units of the storage system based on latency. In embodiments, a set of physical units of a storage device may be selected for the performance of low latency access operations. For example, a set of 10 dies of a storage device may be selected for the performance of SLC access operations. While the set of physical units of the storage device are selected, any low latency access operations received by the storage device may be performed by the set of physical units selected for the performance of low latency access operations. For example, any SLC write operations received by the storage device may be performed by the set of 10 dies that were selected for the performance of SLC access operations. The remaining physical units of the storage device may perform other access operations received by the storage device. For example, the remaining dies of the storage device may be used to perform MLC, TLC, and/or QLC access operations.
The selected set of physical units may perform low latency access operations until the occurrence of a triggering event that causes the selection of a new set of physical units for the performance of low latency access operations. For example, if the available storage capacity of the set of physical units is running low or an amount of time has elapsed since the set of physical units was selected, then a new set of physical units of the storage device may be selected to perform low latency access operations. In embodiments, this process may be iteratively repeated such that the selection of sets of physical units of the storage device is rotated through the physical units of the storage device.
By selecting a set of physical units of the storage device for the performance of low latency operations, physical unit contention caused by higher latency access operations is reduced or eliminated because the higher latency access operations are no longer being performed by the selected set of physical units. Therefore, the performance of low latency access operations may not be delayed by higher latency access operations that are being performed by these physical units, improving the performance of the storage system.
The storage controller 1610 may select a set of dies of storage device 1604 from dies 1602 for the performance of low latency access operations (e.g., low latency dies 1606). The remaining dies 1608 of the storage device 1604 may be available for the performance of other access operations.
In embodiments, a low latency access operation may be an access operation associated with data that was or is being programmed using a low latency programming mode. In some embodiments, the other access operations may be access operations that are associated with data that was or is being programmed using a higher latency programming mode than the low latency programming mode. For example, if the low latency programming mode is SLC mode, then the higher latency programming modes may be MLC mode, TLC mode, QLC mode, etc.
In some embodiments, there may be multiple low latency programming modes that are performed by the low latency dies 1606. For example, the low latency dies 1606 may perform access operations associated with SLC mode and MLC mode, while the remaining dies 1608 may perform access operations associated with TLC mode and QLC mode.
In an embodiment, the number of dies 1602 that are selected as low latency dies 1606 may be dynamically adjusted. In some embodiments, the number of dies 1602 that are selected as low latency dies 1606 may be selected to increase the number of parallel access operations that are being performed by the storage device 1604. For example, if there is die contention between access operations at the low latency dies 1606, then the number of dies 1602 selected as low latency dies 1606 may be increased.
As the access requests are received, the storage controller 1610 may identify a programming mode associated each access request and send commands for the performance of the access operations to the appropriate dies 1602 of the storage device 1604 based on the programming mode. For example, the storage controller 1610 may identify SLC access operations and send commands for the performance of the SLC access operations to low latency dies 1606 and identify MLC, TLC, and QLC access operations and send commands for the performance of the MLC, TLC, and QLC access operations to the remaining dies 1608.
Referring to
In some embodiments, a triggering event may be when the time 1802 satisfies the time threshold 1804 or when the storage capacity 1806 satisfies the capacity threshold 1808. In embodiments, other types of triggering events may be used. In embodiments, a threshold may be satisfied if a value associated with the threshold is greater than or equal to the threshold. In some embodiments, a threshold may be satisfied if a value associated with the threshold is less than or equal to the threshold. For example, if the time 1802 is greater than or equal to the time threshold 1804, then the time threshold 1804 may be satisfied and a triggering event has occurred that causes the storage controller 1610 to select a new set of dies 1602 for the performance of low latency access operations. In another example, if the storage capacity 1806 is less than or equal to the capacity threshold 1808, then the capacity threshold 1808 may be satisfied and a triggering event has occurred that causes the storage controller 1610 to select a new set of dies 1602 for the performance of low latency access operations.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the storage controller 1610 may select particular dies of storage device 1604 to be included in the low latency dies 1902 based on various criteria. In embodiments, the storage controller 1610 may select particular dies for wear leveling purposes. For example, if a particular die has a large number of program/erase (P/E) cycles relative to other dies of the storage device 1604, then the particular die may be included in the low latency dies 1902. In some embodiments, the storage controller 1610 may select particular dies as part of a rotation of different dies of the storage device 1604 performing low latency access operations. In embodiments, a particular die may be included in the low latency dies 1902 if one or more blocks in that particular die are no longer able to reliably store data using higher latency programming modes, such as QLC.
Upon selection of low latency dies 1902 for the performance of low latency access operations, the previously selected set of dies (e.g., low latency dies 1606 in
Method 2000 may begin at block 2002, where the processing logic selects a first set of units of a storage device for performance of low latency access operations.
At block 2004, the processing logic determines whether a triggering event has occurred that causes selection of a new set of physical units of the storage device for the performance of low latency access operations.
At block 2006, the processing logic selects a second set of physical units of the storage device for the performance of low latency access operations upon determining that the triggering event has occurred.
One or more embodiments may be described herein with the aid of method steps illustrating the performance of specified functions and relationships thereof. The boundaries and sequence of these functional building blocks and method steps have been arbitrarily defined herein for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries and sequences can be defined so long as the specified functions and relationships are appropriately performed. Any such alternate boundaries or sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. Further, the boundaries of these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries could be defined as long as the certain significant functions are appropriately performed. Similarly, flow diagram blocks may also have been arbitrarily defined herein to illustrate certain significant functionality.
To the extent used, the flow diagram block boundaries and sequence could have been defined otherwise and still perform the certain significant functionality. Such alternate definitions of both functional building blocks and flow diagram blocks and sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. One of average skill in the art will also recognize that the functional building blocks, and other illustrative blocks, modules and components herein, can be implemented as illustrated or by discrete components, application specific integrated circuits, processors executing appropriate software and the like or any combination thereof.
While particular combinations of various functions and features of the one or more embodiments are expressly described herein, other combinations of these features and functions are likewise possible. The present disclosure is not limited by the particular examples disclosed herein and expressly incorporates these other combinations.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/455,705, filed Jun. 27, 2019, which is a continuation application of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 10,353,630, issued Jul. 16, 2019, which is a continuation application of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 10,126,982, issued Nov. 13, 2018, which is a continuation application of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 9,569,116, issued Feb. 14, 2017, which is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 9,298,376, issued Mar. 29, 2016, which is a continuation application of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 8,589,655, issued Nov. 19, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4200841 | Nagata et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
5208813 | Stallmo | May 1993 | A |
5390327 | Lubbers et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403639 | Belsan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5479653 | Jones | Dec 1995 | A |
5495572 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5649093 | Hanko et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715193 | Norman | Feb 1998 | A |
5764767 | Beimel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797022 | Shimotono et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802264 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5912595 | Ma et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920501 | Norman | Jul 1999 | A |
5940838 | Schmuck et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941993 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953255 | Lee | Sep 1999 | A |
6018778 | Stolowitz | Jan 2000 | A |
6041366 | Maddalozzo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6092215 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6157963 | Courtright et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182214 | Hardjono | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6263350 | Wollrath et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275898 | DeKoning | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292856 | Marcotte | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301640 | Barve et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6321345 | Mann et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6408357 | Hanmann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412045 | DeKoning et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6535417 | Tsuda et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6574780 | Coz | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6625748 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643748 | Wieland | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6718448 | Ofer | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725392 | Frey et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6757769 | Ofer | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6799283 | Tamai et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6834298 | Singer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836816 | Kendall | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850938 | Sadjadi | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859112 | Mason | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871011 | Rahman et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6915434 | Kuroda et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6973549 | Testardi | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985995 | Holland et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991908 | Mori et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7028216 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028218 | Schwarm et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032125 | Holt et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039827 | Meyer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051155 | Talagala et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7065617 | Wang | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069383 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076606 | Orsley | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7107480 | Moshayedi et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7127545 | Nandi et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7159150 | Kenchammana-Hosekote et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162575 | Dalal et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164608 | Lee | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216164 | Whitmore et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7334156 | Land et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7370220 | Nguyen et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7424498 | Patterson | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7424592 | Karr et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7444532 | Masuyama et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7480658 | Heinla et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480818 | Makita | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7536506 | Ashmore et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7558859 | Kasiolas et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565446 | Talagala et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7613947 | Coatney et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7619932 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631023 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7676626 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681104 | Sim-Tang et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7681105 | Sim-Tang et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7694063 | Nandi et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7730258 | Smith et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7743276 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757038 | Kitahara | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778960 | Chatterjee et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783682 | Patterson | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7788553 | Chow et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814272 | Barrall et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814273 | Barrall | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818531 | Barrall | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822912 | Pua et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827351 | Suetsugu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827439 | Mathew et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7870105 | Arakawa et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873619 | Faibish et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7877380 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885938 | Greene et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7886111 | Klemm et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908448 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7913300 | Flank et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7916538 | Jeon et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7926059 | Viswanathan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933936 | Aggarwal et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941697 | Mathew et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958303 | Shuster | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971129 | Watson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979613 | Zohar et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991822 | Bish et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010485 | Chatterjee et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8010829 | Chatterjee et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8020047 | Courtney | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8046548 | Chatterjee et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046551 | Sahin | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8051361 | Sim-Tang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8051362 | Li et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060686 | Yeh | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060798 | Roohparvar et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082393 | Galloway et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086634 | Mimatsu | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086652 | Bisson et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8086911 | Taylor | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8090837 | Shin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095763 | Piszczek et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108502 | Tabbara et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117388 | Jernigan, IV | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8117464 | Kogelnik | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8120959 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140821 | Raizen et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8145736 | Tewari et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8145838 | Miller et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8145840 | Koul et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8156305 | Goodson et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8176360 | Frost et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180855 | Aiello et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8200887 | Bennett | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200922 | McKean et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205065 | Matze | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225006 | Karamcheti | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8239618 | Kotzur et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244999 | Chatterjee et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8305811 | Jeon | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315999 | Chatley et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327080 | Der | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8351290 | Huang et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8352540 | Anglin et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8375146 | Sinclair | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8397016 | Talagala et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402152 | Duran | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402243 | Wakrat et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402247 | Goodson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412880 | Leibowitz et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423739 | Ash et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429436 | Fillingim et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8443077 | Lappas et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8468318 | Colgrove et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473677 | Gladwin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473778 | Simitci et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479037 | Chatterjee et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8498967 | Chatterjee et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8504064 | Lamba et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8522073 | Cohen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527544 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8533527 | Daikokuya et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544029 | Bakke et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560747 | Tan et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8589625 | Colgrove et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589655 | Colgrove et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8595455 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8615599 | Takefman et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8621241 | Stephenson | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8627136 | Shankar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8627138 | Clark et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8638602 | Horn | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8645657 | Colgrove et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8660131 | Vermunt et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661218 | Piszczek et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8694719 | Lassa et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700875 | Barron et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8706694 | Chatterjee et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706914 | Duchesneau | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707112 | Roohparvar et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713405 | Healey, Jr. et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8725730 | Keeton et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732426 | Colgrove et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8737136 | Cometti | May 2014 | B2 |
8751463 | Chamness | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756387 | Frost et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762622 | Moshayedi et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762793 | Grube et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8773903 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775868 | Colgrove et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782331 | Yano et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788913 | Xin et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8799746 | Baker et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8806160 | Colgrove et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812771 | Yim et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819311 | Liao | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819383 | Jobanputra et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819503 | Melik-Martirosian | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824261 | Miller et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8825941 | Moshayedi et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832507 | Post et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838883 | DAbreu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843700 | Salessi et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8850108 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8850288 | Lazier et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8856593 | Eckhardt et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8856619 | Cypher | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8862820 | Colgrove et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862847 | Feng et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862928 | Xavier et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868825 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8874836 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8874850 | Goodson et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8886778 | Nedved et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8891298 | Rao | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898383 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898388 | Kimmel | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8904231 | Coatney et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918478 | Ozzie et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930307 | Colgrove et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8930633 | Amit et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8949502 | McKnight et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959110 | Smith et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959305 | LeCrone et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8966343 | Syu et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8972818 | Strauss et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977597 | Ganesh et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8990458 | Yano et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8990607 | Lee et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003144 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9009724 | Gold et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021053 | Bembo et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021215 | Meir et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025393 | Wu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037827 | Colgrove et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9043372 | Makkar et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9053808 | Sprouse et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053810 | Dutta et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058155 | Cepulis et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058291 | Blaum et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9081713 | Bennett | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9116819 | Cope et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117536 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9122401 | Zaltsman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9122592 | Cheon et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134908 | Horn et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134924 | Yano et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9153337 | Sutardja | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9158612 | Roohparvar et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9171627 | Lee et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176864 | Gorobets et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9189334 | Bennett | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9189650 | Jaye et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9196385 | Rao | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201733 | Verma et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9207876 | Shu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9251066 | Colgrove et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9274893 | Chen | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9298376 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9304694 | Colgrove et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9304856 | Tressler et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9311182 | Bennett | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9323667 | Bennett | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9323681 | Apostolides et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9348538 | Mallaiah et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9384082 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9390019 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9405478 | Koseki et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9412471 | Kim et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9423967 | Colgrove et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9432541 | Ishida | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9436396 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9436720 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9454476 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9454477 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9477632 | Du | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9483346 | Davis et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9513820 | Shalev | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9516016 | Colgrove et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9542271 | Li | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9552248 | Miller et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9552299 | Stalzer | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9569116 | Colgrove et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9569118 | Camp et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9588690 | Fluman et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9588699 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9588842 | Sanvido et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9612747 | Fluman et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9613704 | Lee | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9619181 | Ono | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632870 | Bennett | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9697076 | Chen | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9697087 | Koarashi | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720754 | Karakulak et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9734911 | Sinclair et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9785357 | Raghu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9785360 | Ravindranath et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9792998 | Yang et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9818478 | Chung | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9829066 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9847136 | Kim et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9857992 | Pangal et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9934872 | Magia et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9959057 | Fluman et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9972396 | Naik et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9977714 | Yang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9983929 | Shalvi et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9997240 | Rao | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10013210 | Lin et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10037285 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10061512 | Lin | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10096357 | Lin | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10126982 | Colgrove et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10168913 | Lin et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10216411 | Davis et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10223028 | Gorobets et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10248516 | Sanvido et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10275312 | Barhate et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10283205 | Malshe et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10296231 | Tsou et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10347330 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10347344 | Malshe et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10353630 | Colgrove et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10374634 | Malina et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10387243 | Liu et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10482983 | Alhussien et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10489075 | Choi et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10503598 | Trichardt et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10521287 | Khoueir et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10521353 | Lim | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10621021 | Leggette et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10645164 | Malwankar et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10664363 | Liu et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10761929 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10860446 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10936206 | Dittia | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10990283 | Davis et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10990480 | Bernat et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
11030107 | Shergill et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11194473 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2021 | B1 |
11243837 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
20020038436 | Suzuki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065833 | Litvin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083379 | Nishikawa et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087544 | Selkirk et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103969 | Koizumi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144059 | Kendall | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178335 | Selkirk et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005252 | Wilson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016596 | Chiquoine et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030105984 | Masuyama et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110205 | Johnson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140209 | Testardi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030231072 | Mason | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040049572 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040117441 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128428 | Christenson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161086 | Buntin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050001652 | Malik et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050065961 | Aguren | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066095 | Mullick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076228 | Davis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050216535 | Saika et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223154 | Uemura | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235132 | Karr et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273310 | Newburn | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278460 | Shin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283649 | Turner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015683 | Ashmore et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074940 | Craft et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060114930 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136365 | Kedem et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143648 | Shinokawa | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155946 | Ji | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174157 | Barrall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060248294 | Nedved et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293777 | Breitgand | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070067585 | Ueda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079068 | Draggon | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079072 | Collier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070162954 | Pela | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171562 | Maejima et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174673 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174720 | Kubo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070214194 | Reuter | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214314 | Reuter | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220313 | Katsuragi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234016 | Davis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245090 | King et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266179 | Chavan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268905 | Baker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285986 | Eguchi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080059699 | Kubo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065852 | Moore et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071973 | Chow et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080709 | Michtchenko et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095375 | Tateoka et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104309 | Cheon | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107274 | Worthy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126680 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134174 | Sheu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155191 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177922 | Chow et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178040 | Kobayashi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189489 | Mitra | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209096 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080244205 | Amano et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275928 | Shuster | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285083 | Aonuma | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295118 | Liao | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307270 | Li | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006587 | Richter | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037662 | Frese et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043831 | Antonopoulos | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049256 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077208 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090132778 | Danilak | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138654 | Sutardja | May 2009 | A1 |
20090204858 | Kawaba | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216910 | Duchesneau | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216920 | Lauterbach et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228648 | Wack | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249013 | Daud et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259882 | Shellhamer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300084 | Whitehouse | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327590 | Moshayedi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327591 | Moshayedi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017444 | Chatterjee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017556 | Chin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017650 | Chin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037118 | Saliba et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042636 | Lu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057673 | Savov | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058026 | Heil et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100067706 | Anan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077205 | Ekstrom et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077252 | Siewert et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082879 | McKean et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094806 | Apostolides et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106905 | Kurashige et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115070 | Missimilly | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115183 | Araki | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125695 | Wu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153620 | McKean et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153630 | Yim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153631 | Moon et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153632 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153641 | Jagadish et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153740 | Dodgson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162003 | Dodgson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162004 | Dodgson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162076 | Sim-Tang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169707 | Mathew et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174576 | Naylor | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191897 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100235574 | Um | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241792 | Lee | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250802 | Waugh et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250882 | Hutchison et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268908 | Ouyang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281225 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287327 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312915 | Marowsky-Bree et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110035540 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040925 | Frost et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060927 | Fillingim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072300 | Rousseau | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078372 | Gladwin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110119462 | Leach et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145598 | Smith et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161559 | Yurzola et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167221 | Pangal et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208896 | Wakrat et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219170 | Frost et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225361 | Resch et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238625 | Hamaguchi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238634 | Kobara | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258362 | McLaren et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264843 | Haines et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302369 | Goto et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320688 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011398 | Eckhardt et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017042 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023375 | Dutta et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030529 | Roohparvar et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036309 | Dillow et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047409 | Post et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066435 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066447 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066448 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066449 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079318 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084505 | Colgrove et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110249 | Jeong et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117029 | Gold | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131253 | McKnight et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149369 | Lamba et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150826 | Vijayan Retnamma et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158923 | Mohamed et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167100 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179890 | Goodson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191900 | Kunimatsu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198152 | Terry et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198175 | Atkisson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198261 | Brown et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209943 | Jung | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226934 | Rao | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239976 | Cometti et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239991 | Melik-Martirosian | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246435 | Meir et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120260055 | Murase | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120297121 | Gorobets et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297122 | Gorobets et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311245 | Yano et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311557 | Resch | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330954 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130021846 | Rao | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022201 | Glew et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036314 | Glew et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130042052 | Colgrove et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130042056 | Shats et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046995 | Movshovitz | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047029 | Ikeuchi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060884 | Bembo et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067188 | Mehra et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073894 | Xavier et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091102 | Nayak | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130124776 | Hallak et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132800 | Healey, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151653 | Sawicki et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151771 | Tsukahara et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173853 | Ungureanu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185612 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130205110 | Kettner | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227236 | Flynn et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238554 | Yucel et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130259234 | Acar et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262758 | Smith et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275391 | Batwara et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275656 | Talagala et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275710 | Colgrove et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283058 | Fiske et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290648 | Shao et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130318314 | Markus et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130339303 | Potter et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339314 | Carpentier et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339635 | Amit et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339818 | Baker et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006688 | Yu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019673 | Wakrat et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040535 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040683 | Roohparvar et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040702 | He et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047263 | Coatney et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047269 | Kim | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052946 | Kimmel | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059405 | Syu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140063721 | Herman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140064048 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140068224 | Fan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140068791 | Resch | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075115 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075236 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075252 | Luo et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089730 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140101361 | Gschwind | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101511 | Strauss et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108796 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140136808 | Colgrove et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136880 | Shankar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143517 | Jin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164881 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172929 | Sedayao et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181402 | White | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140201150 | Kumarasamy et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215129 | Kuzmin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229131 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229452 | Serita et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237164 | Le et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244903 | Yano et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254264 | Dutta et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258602 | Yano et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279936 | Bembo et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280025 | Eidson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281308 | Lango et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281770 | Kim et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289588 | Nagadomi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297926 | Ono | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325115 | Ramsundar et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140359202 | Sun et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140359346 | Chen | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379970 | Cheon et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140380125 | Calder et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140380126 | Yekhanin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150019918 | Li | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032720 | James | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032958 | Colgrove et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039645 | Lewis | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039849 | Lewis | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058662 | Yang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150089283 | Kermarrec et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089623 | Sondhi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100746 | Rychlik et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134824 | Mickens et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150153800 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150179269 | Lee | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180714 | Chunn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150193299 | Hyun et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199138 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199232 | Tressler et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150234709 | Koarashi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244775 | Vibhor et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150254004 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150278013 | Rao | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150278534 | Thiyagarajan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150280959 | Vincent | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150370491 | Cheon et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012895 | Ahn et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160019114 | Han et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041868 | Davis et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160062660 | Kunimatsu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070474 | Yu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160093384 | Lee | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098191 | Golden et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160098199 | Golden et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125956 | Magia et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160139820 | Fluman et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160139986 | Chen | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147582 | Karakulak et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160155496 | Rao | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179597 | Gorobets et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160188223 | Camp et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253093 | Zhang | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160299814 | Shalvi et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160357458 | Pangal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170024141 | Davis et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170047124 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170109040 | Raghu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170115933 | Lin et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170123687 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170131919 | Fluman et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170285953 | Fan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170285954 | Fan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287568 | Yang et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170364265 | Lin et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180081750 | Leggette et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180101302 | Lin | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180101303 | Lin | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114570 | Lin | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180165015 | Malina et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180239670 | Yang et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180341549 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349234 | Liu et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373437 | Navon et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190034279 | Trichardt et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042130 | Prabhu et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190042140 | Natarajan et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190042343 | Khoueir et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190050153 | Yang et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190056994 | Shulkin et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190057031 | Kern et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066802 | Malshe et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190095296 | McMurchie et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190095321 | Lin et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190103164 | Malshe et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190179533 | Davis et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190179698 | Liu et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190228827 | Syu et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190237146 | Malshe et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190272871 | Yang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295660 | Malshe et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190332504 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190369899 | Tanpairoj et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200110540 | Delaney et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200167274 | Bahirat et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200257590 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200334163 | Shergill et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210019093 | Karr et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210089399 | Norden | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210216209 | Davis et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103370685 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103370686 | Oct 2013 | CN |
104025010 | Nov 2016 | CN |
2164006 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2256621 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2639997 | Sep 2013 | EP |
3066610 | Sep 2016 | EP |
3082047 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3120235 | Jan 2017 | EP |
H09044314 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H09160729 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H09244931 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2007087036 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007094472 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008250667 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008251056 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2010211681 | Sep 2010 | JP |
1995002349 | Jan 1995 | WO |
1999013403 | Mar 1999 | WO |
2006069235 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2008102347 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008103569 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008157081 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2010071655 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2012174427 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013032544 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013032825 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2002013033 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2022164490 | Aug 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hwang et al., “RAID-x: A New Distributed Disk Array for I/O-Centric Cluster Computing,” HPDC '00 Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, IEEE, 2000, pp. 279-286. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2016/024391, dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2015/034291, dated Sep. 30, 2015. |
Kim et al., “Data Access Frequency based Data Replication Method using Erasure Codes in Cloud Storage System,” Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers, Feb. 2014, vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 85-91. |
EP Communication pursuant to Article 94(3), EP-11764390.8, dated Feb. 14, 2014, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2011/051654, dated Dec. 19, 2011, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2011/051707, dated Nov. 30, 2011, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2011/051710, dated Dec. 7, 2011, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2011/051752, dated Nov. 30, 2011, 12 pages. |
Microsoft Corporation, “Fundamentals of Garbage Collection”, Retrieved Aug. 30, 2013 via the WayBack Machine, 11 pages. |
Microsoft Corporation, “GCSettings.IsServerGC Property”, Retrieved Oct. 27, 2013 via the WayBack Machine, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/018169, dated May 15, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/034302, dated Sep. 11, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/039135, dated Sep. 18, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/039136, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/039137, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/039142, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/044370, dated Dec. 15, 2015, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/014356, dated Jun. 28, 2016, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/014357, dated Jun. 29, 2016, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/014361, dated May 30, 2016, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/014604, dated May 19, 2016, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/016504, dated Jul. 6, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/023485, dated Jul. 21, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/026529, dated Jul. 19, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/031039, dated Aug. 18, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/033306, dated Aug. 19, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/042147, dated Nov. 30, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/047808, dated Nov. 25, 2016, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/054080, dated Dec. 21, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/056917, dated Jan. 27, 2017, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2021/056870, dated Feb. 16, 2022, 14 pages. |
Schmid, “RAID Scaling Charts, Part 3:4-128 kB Stripes Compared”, Tom's Hardware, Nov. 27, 2007, URL: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/RAID-SCALING-CHARTS.1735-4.html, 24 pages. |
Stalzer, “Flash Blades: System Architecture and Applications,” Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Architectures and Systems for Big Data, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2012, 5 pages. |
Storer et al.; “Pergamum: Replacing Tape with Energy Efficient, Reliable, Disk-Based Archival Storage”, 6th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '08) Feb. 26-29, 2008, 16 pages, USENIX Berkeley, CA. |
Wong et al., “Verifiable Secret Redistribution for Archive Systems”, Proceedings on First International IEEE Security in Storage Workshop (SISW'02), Dec. 2002, 12 pages, IEEE Xplore, DOI: 10.1109/SISW.2002.1183515. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210173588 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16142690 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16455705 | US | |
Parent | 15418944 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 16142690 | US | |
Parent | 15000602 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15418944 | US | |
Parent | 14083163 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 15000602 | US | |
Parent | 12882854 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14083163 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16455705 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 17159796 | US |