The present invention generally relates to an improved system for presenting one or more synthetic images, and more particularly relates to an optionally transferable optical system with a reduced thickness.
As described in detail in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., the focal length of focusing elements in micro-optic materials determines the optical separation of the focusing elements from an image icon array. In other words, the arrays in these micro-optic materials are positioned on either side of an optical spacer so as to align the focal point of each focusing element with its associated image icon(s). When the focal point lies on or within the image icon array, the synthetic image is in sharp focus. When, however, the focal point lies above or below the image icon array, the synthetic image is blurry and out of focus.
By way of the present invention, the requirement for an optical spacer (i.e., a flexible transparent polymeric film-like material) to provide the necessary focal distance between the focusing elements and their associated image icon(s) is removed. As a result, overall system thicknesses are reduced, suitability as a surface-applied authentication system is enabled, and tamper resistance is improved.
More specifically, the present invention provides an optionally transferable optical system with a reduced thickness, which basically comprises a synthetic image presentation system made up of one or more arrangements of structured image icons substantially in contact with, but not completely embedded within, one or more arrangements of focusing elements, wherein the one or more arrangements of image icons and the one or more arrangements of focusing elements cooperate to form at least one synthetic image of at least a portion of the image icons, wherein interstitial space between focusing elements in the one or more arrangements of focusing elements does not contribute to the formation of the at least one synthetic image.
The phrase “substantially in contact”, as used herein, is intended to mean that either the top or bottom (e.g., apex or base) of the focusing elements is substantially in contact with or touches the image icons.
Focusing elements contemplated for use in the present invention include refractive, reflective (e.g., concave reflective, convex reflective), hybrid refractive/reflective, and diffractive focusing elements. Examples of such focusing elements are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al., which are fully incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. Interstitial space between focusing elements in the arrangements used in inventive micro-scale systems is typically about 5 microns or less for systems with a total thickness of less than about 50 microns, while interstitial space in inventive macro-scale systems is typically greater in size, preferably about 5 millimeters or less for systems with a total thickness of less than or equal to 1 centimeter. It is noted that reflective focusing elements reflect incident light and may be metalized to obtain high focusing efficiency. For metallization, the profiles of the lens structures of the concave reflective or convex reflective arrangements may be provided with a reflecting metal layer (e.g., a vapor deposited metal layer). Instead of a fully opaque reflecting metal layer, a semitransparent (or partially metalized) metal layer, or a high refractive index layer can be provided. Furthermore, multiple layers of vapor deposited material may be used to provide reflectivity, for example, color-shifting interference coatings formed from dielectric layers, or from a combination of metal and dielectric layers such as metal/dielectric/metal may also provide the necessary reflectivity.
Image icons contemplated for use in the present invention are structured image icons (i.e., image icons having a physical relief). In one exemplary embodiment, the image icons are optionally coated and/or filled voids or recesses (e.g., voids in a substantially planar structure, the voids optionally filled or coated with another material), while in another exemplary embodiment, the image icons are formed from raised areas or shaped posts (e.g., raised areas in a substantially planar structure). Examples of structured image icons are also described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al.
Unexpectedly and quite surprisingly, the present inventors have discovered that tailoring the focal length of the focusing elements in the inventive system serves to obviate the need for an optical spacer. It was found that the arrangement(s) of image icons may intersect the depth of focus of the arrangement(s) of focusing elements without the need for an optical spacer, resulting in a thinner, more streamlined system capable of presenting at least one synthetic image. Moreover, and as will be explained in more detail below, the present inventors have also discovered that when certain focusing element designs are used, it is possible to transfer the inventive system to a value document or product without a base film or carrier substrate forming any part of the transferred system. Both discoveries have resulted in a synthetic image presentation system having a decrease in cross-sectional thickness, a suitability as a surface-applied security feature, and a reduced risk of interlayer delamination.
Other benefits realized by the subject invention include increased tamper resistance and projected images with improved contrast and clarity. As will be readily appreciated, optical systems lacking a tough optical spacer between the focusing elements and image icons are more difficult to remove intact from a final substrate once bonded. Moreover, the closer the focusing elements are to the image icons, the greater the contrast and clarity of the projected images. Without the additional thickness imposed by an optical spacer film (typically a biaxially-oriented optical spacer film) between focusing elements and image icons, there is less light scattering and birefringence. This results in images that appear sharper and have greater contrast.
As alluded to above, various system size ranges are contemplated by the present invention. In addition to micro-scale systems, macro-scale systems are also contemplated. Such larger scale systems may constitute unitary or complete film structures, or may be formed with replaceable image icon arrangements.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following drawings. Components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure.
Particular features of the disclosed invention are illustrated by reference to the accompanying drawings which are cross-sectional side views of the following exemplary embodiments of the present invention:
Exemplary embodiments of the inventive system will now be disclosed in connection with the drawings. There is no intent, however, to limit the present disclosure to the embodiments disclosed herein. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents. For example, additional features or functionality, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al., may also be included in the invention system. Such additional features or functionality may comprise textured surfaces for better adhesion to further layers, adhesion promoters, etc. The inventive system may also contain overt or covert information such as customized or personalized information in the form of serial numbers, bar codes, images, etc. that can be formed using traditional printing techniques or laser engraving systems. This added functionality would allow interaction between the synthetic images and the covert information. Additionally, information can be overprinted or printed on various layers at all stages of manufacture, or post manufacture.
In a first exemplary embodiment, which is best shown in
The synthetic image presentation system 14 in this first exemplary embodiment employs refractive focusing elements 16, which each have a focal length such that a structured image icon 18 placed substantially in contact or close to its base intersects with a portion of its depth of focus, when viewed normal to the surface. Generally, these focusing elements have very low f-numbers (e.g., less than or equal to 1) and cylindrical, spheric or aspheric surfaces.
The term “f-number”, as used herein, is intended to mean the ratio of a focusing element's focal length (real or virtual in the case of convex reflectors) to its effective lens diameter.
The synthetic image presentation system 14 may be cast against the carrier substrate 12. The materials forming carrier substrate 12 can be selected from plastics, cellulose, composites, polyamide (e.g., nylon 6), polycarbonate, polyester, polyethylene, polyethylene napthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, polyvinylidene chloride films or sheets, mylar sheets, cellophane, paper, rag/cotton, combinations thereof, and the like.
The arrangements of structured image icons and focusing elements of the synthetic image presentation system 14 may be formed from a variety of materials such as substantially transparent or clear, colored or colorless polymers such as acrylics, acrylated polyesters, acrylated urethanes, epoxies, polycarbonates, polypropylenes, polyesters, urethanes, and the like, using methods such as extrusion (e.g., extrusion embossing, soft embossing), radiation cured casting, and injection molding, reaction injection molding, and reaction casting. High refractive index, colored or colorless materials having refractive indices (at 589 nanometers, 20° C.) of more than 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, or higher, such as those described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2010/0109317 A1 to Hoffmuller et al., may also be used in the practice of the present invention.
An exemplary method of manufacture is to form the icons as voids in a radiation cured liquid polymer (e.g., acrylated urethane) that is cast from an icon mold against a base film (i.e., carrier substrate 12), such as 75 gauge adhesion-promoted PET film, then to fill the icon voids with a submicron particle pigmented coloring material by gravure-like doctor blading against the polymeric icon surface, then to solidify the fill by suitable means (e.g., solvent removal, radiation curing, or chemical reaction), then to cast lenses against the filled icons by bringing the icon side of the base film against a lens mold filled with radiation curable polymer, and solidifying the polymer by application of ultraviolet (UV) light or other actinic radiation.
For micro-scale systems used, for example, in the form of a security strip, thread, patch, or overlay:
In a second exemplary embodiment, which is best shown in
By way of the present exemplary embodiment, the inventors made the surprising discovery that synthetic image presenting optics may in fact be successfully separated from a carrier film. As will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, the crest and trough geometry of focusing elements described herein means that the optical structure will be more resistant to release from a carrier film, as compared to smoother films or foils (e.g., holograms), which have lower surface areas and lower aspect ratios of microstructured features, making them easier to separate from a carrier film. Moreover, incorrect separation operations cause nonuniform stresses to be applied to the system being transferred, negatively impacting upon the ability of these systems to project synthetic images. The synthetic image presenting optics of the present invention rely on the focusing of light within the volume of the transferred structure and applied stress may cause distortions in the volume of the structure. By utilizing the techniques and optical structures described herein, these difficulties are overcome.
Referring again to
An optional stiffening layer 32 is shown on the arrangement of structured image icons of the synthetic image presentation system 30. Process performance is enhanced by making system 30 have a higher stiffness or resistance to bending than the carrier substrate 24 and “lens mold” layer 26. The stiffening layer 32 may be prepared from energy curable acrylates and has a preferred thickness between 1 and 10 microns. In addition to, or instead of, stiffening layer 32, one or more sealing layers may be applied to the arrangement of structured image icons. Such a sealing layer may be prepared from energy curable acrylates (e.g., energy curable acrylates containing organic or inorganic fillers with pigmenting or reinforcing properties), solvent or water based coatings such as acrylics, epoxies, ethylene-vinyl acetates (EVAs), polyurethanes, polyvinyl alcohols (PVAs), and the like, and may have a thickness between 1 and 10 microns.
Adhesive layer 34 is shown on the stiffened system 30 in
An exemplary method of manufacturing the transferable refractive optical system of the present invention comprises:
Once prepared, the transferable refractive optical system 20 may be handled like a traditional transfer foil, that is, the material can be wound and unwound from a roll and further converted into a suitable final shape such as a patch, thread, or sheet by converting methods common in the security printing and packaging industries. In order to transfer the synthetic image presentation system 30 from the release liner 22, the adhesive side of the system 20 is placed in contact with a desired final substrate (e.g., paper substrate 28). Heat and/or pressure is applied causing the adhesive in adhesive layer 34 to bond securely to substrate 28. Then, the release liner 22 with “lens mold” layer 26 is peeled away, leaving behind the desired synthetic image presentation system 30.
As will be readily appreciated from the above description, for reliable separation to occur using this technique, relative bond strengths must be controlled as follows:
Strongest Bond Strengths:
Mid-Range Bond Strength:
Weakest Bond Strength:
While bond strengths may be higher or lower depending on the process conditions and final product requirements, the relative interfacial bond strengths must be maintained in the aforementioned way. For example, if the cured optically functional polymer bonds very aggressively to the rigid icon mold, then this sets the minimum bond strength value, and all other bonds must be adjusted higher accordingly.
In a third exemplary embodiment, which is best shown in
The synthetic image presentation system 40 in this exemplary embodiment employs concave reflective focusing elements 42, which each have a focal length such that a structured image icon 44 placed substantially in contact or close to its crest or highest point intersects with a portion of its depth of focus, when viewed normal to the surface. These reflective focusing elements are coated with a reflective material to obtain high focusing efficiency. For example, the focusing elements may be conformally coated with a reflective material such as aluminum, chrome, copper, gold, nickel, silver, stainless steel, tin, titanium, zinc sulfide, magnesium fluoride, titanium dioxide, or other material providing the desired level of reflectivity. This reflective material may be applied at thicknesses ranging from about 50 nanometers to about 2 microns using physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or other suitable process. A protective coating may then be applied to protect the reflective layer. Protective coatings may be prepared from energy curable acrylates (e.g., energy curable acrylates containing organic or inorganic fillers with pigmenting or reinforcing properties), solvent or water based coatings such as acrylics, epoxies, EVAs, polyurethanes, PVAs, and the like, and applied at thicknesses ranging from about 1 to about 10 microns.
Generally, these focusing elements have very low f-numbers, preferably, less than about 1, and more preferably, between about 0.25 and about 0.50, and cylindrical, spheric or aspheric surfaces. As noted above, f-number means the ratio of a focusing element's focal length to its effective lens diameter. For a spherical concave reflector, the focal length is equal to the radius of curvature divided by two.
For reflective focusing elements with an f number greater than about 1, the optical separation required for focusing on an image icon layer is too large to be practical without employing the use of an optical spacer. For f-numbers less than about 0.25, the focal points of the reflectors will lie within the volume of the reflector (i.e., within the region bounded by the crest and the trough of the reflector) and will be out of focus with an image icon layer formed at its base. So f-numbers between about 1 and about 0.25 are preferred for the inventive system to present focused synthetic images without the use of an optical spacer.
The synthetic image presentation system 40 may be formed against the carrier substrate 38 during formation of the structured image icons and focusing elements by the method of casting and releasing from microstructured molds using energy curable polymers. Suitable carrier substrates include those described in the first exemplary embodiment. Similarly, the arrangements of structured image icons and focusing elements of the synthetic image presentation system 40 can be formed from the materials identified above with respect to the first exemplary embodiment.
The preferred dimensions for micro-scale systems are also the same as those identified for the first exemplary embodiment. For macro-scale systems used, for example, for signage or in the form of motor vehicle decals or wraps:
Macro-scale reflective optical systems contemplated by way of the present invention may employ image icons formed using conventional printing techniques (e.g., traditional inkjet or laser printing). These systems are made up of one or more arrangements of reflective focusing elements (e.g., concave reflective, convex reflective, reflective diffractive) with dimensions as noted above (e.g., widths/base diameters ranging from about 1 to about 10 millimeters), and printed image icons substantially in contact with, but not completely embedded within, the one or more arrangements of focusing elements. The printed image icons have line widths of less than or equal to about 1 millimeter. As will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, when finer line widths are used, more detailed designs may be applied within the design space afforded by way of these relatively large focusing elements.
In a fourth exemplary embodiment, which is best shown in
When viewing system 46 with image icons situated above the convex reflective focusing elements, the viewer will either see that the specular highlights are blocked by the image icons, or that they are not blocked by the image icons. In other words, the arrangement of convex reflective focusing elements 50 when coupled with the arrangement of structured image icons 54 will form a pattern of blocked and non-blocked specular highlights. This pattern forms a synthetic image.
Generally, these focusing elements also have very low f-numbers, preferably, less than about 1, and more preferably, between about 0.25 and about 0.50, and spheric or aspheric surfaces.
In addition to focusing elements prepared by the methods described herein (as well as in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al.), macro-scale reflective focusing elements of the convex or concave type may also constitute separate discrete structures, or may be formed by casting from these discreet structures. For example, metallic ball bearings can be grouped together into a regular close-packed arrangement onto a flat surface, forming an arrangement of convex reflectors. By placing a transparency film over the top of the ball bearing arrangement, the transparency film having an arrangement of image icons with the same packing arrangement on its surface, the arrangement of image icons having a pitch scaled with respect to the pitch of the ball bearing arrangement, then a macro-scale synthetic image presentation system may be formed.
Such a system of convex reflectors may be useful in a display or billboard installation, in which case the ball bearings (e.g., 3.18 mm diameter highly polished stainless steel) would be permanently bonded to a rigid, flat backing surface by way of, for example, an epoxy or by permanent welds. In this type of installation, image icons can be printed by traditional inkjet or laser printing (e.g., by large format inkjet billboard printing equipment) onto a suitable transparent, printable film or plastic sheeting (e.g., heavy gauge transparent billboard vinyl) and overlaid against the ball bearings with printed side facing the ball bearing arrangement. The printed arrangement may be secured against the ball bearings by way of a frame, or the printing may be covered by a semipermanent adhesive and then adhered to the arrangement of ball bearings. The printed overlay could then be removed and replaced as needed with new graphics as is typical with traditional billboard installations.
In order to reduce the cost and weight of using the discreet reflective elements in the final display, an alternative approach is first to form one permanent arrangement of discreet convex reflective elements, as described above. Focal distance may then be tailored by filling the interstitial spaces of the arrangement to the desired level with an epoxy or mold release agent, and subsequently casting a polymer replica from this arrangement. By using techniques known in the art of macro-scale mold forming (e.g., vacuum forming, heat molding, resin casting, etc.), a rigid sheet having concave lens geometry may be formed and removed from the permanent mold. Once removed, the rigid sheet may be metalized with a reflective coating (e.g., by physical vapor deposition, solution deposition, electroplating, etc.) and is then ready for installation as a concave reflective synthetic image presentation system. By placing a printed graphic arrangement (as described above) in contact with the reflector arrangement, synthetic images may be formed, resulting in a large format display system.
The dimensions of these arrangements may be modified as necessary depending on the required viewing distance. For example, a viewing distance of approximately 90 meters is estimated to require an individual reflector diameter of from about 8 mm to about 1 cm.
Similar to the previously described system embodiments, synthetic image presentation system 56 may be cast against carrier substrate 48, with the materials used and the system dimensions the same as those identified for the third exemplary embodiment.
In a fifth exemplary embodiment, which is best shown in
A reflective layer (e.g., a vapor deposited metal layer) 70, optional protective coating 72, and adhesive layer 74, are shown on the arrangement of focusing elements 76. The reflective layer is a conformally coated reflective layer prepared using aluminum, chrome, copper, gold, nickel, silver, stainless steel, tin, titanium, zinc sulfide, magnesium fluoride, titanium dioxide, or other material providing the desired level of reflectivity. This layer may be applied at thicknesses ranging from about 50 nanometers to about 2 microns using physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or other suitable process. Optional protective coating 72, which serves to protect the reflective layer, may be prepared from energy curable acrylates (e.g., energy curable acrylates containing organic or inorganic fillers with pigmenting or reinforcing properties), solvent or water based coatings such as acrylics, epoxies, EVAs, polyurethanes, PVAs, and the like, and is applied at thicknesses ranging from about 1 to about 10 microns, while the adhesive layer may be prepared from thermally activated adhesives (i.e., hot melt or heat seal adhesives), pressure sensitive adhesives, or any thermoset or thermoplastic adhesive system selected to provide bonding between these target surfaces including acrylics, cyanoacrylates, epoxies, polyimides, polyurethanes, polyvinyl acetates, rubber, and silicones, is preferably prepared from a tack free thermally activated adhesive (e.g., water-based polyurethane), and is applied at thicknesses ranging from about 1 to about 10 microns.
An exemplary method of manufacturing the transferable reflective optical system of the present invention comprises:
The resulting film-like structure can be handled/converted/transferred like a traditional transfer film. In other words, the structure may be brought into contact with a target substrate (e.g., currency paper, ID document, or product packaging), and upon the application of heat and pressure, the release liner can be completely peeled away, leaving only the synthetic image presentation system on the final substrate.
An example of a continuous transfer process for transferring the inventive system to a target substrate employs a hot stamping machine available from Leonard Kurz Stiftung & Co. KG (model number MHA 840). In this process, the system in the form of up to six film-like structures are placed in register (in cross direction (CD)) on a base paper, counter wheel pairs on the hot stamping machine apply pressure (550 Newtons (N)/wheel) to the film-like structures, which causes activation of the tack free thermally activated adhesive layers. The release liners are then separated from the underlying structures and rewound on common cylinders. Typical machine settings are: speed (100-120 meters/minute), temperature (135-160° C.).
Generally speaking, in order for the reflective system to reliably transfer to a final substrate (e.g., paper), the adhesive bond strength between the substrate and the reflective system must be greater than the bond which holds the reflective system to the release liner. Typical bond strengths for such an arrangement may be in the range of 10 to 100 Newtons per square inch (N/in2) for the bond between the reflective system and substrate, and in the range of 0.1 to 10 N/in2 for the bond between the reflective system and release liner.
In a sixth exemplary embodiment, the inventive system is an optionally transferable diffractive optical system. Diffractive focusing elements also provide for convergence of incident light and systems made using these focusing elements are thinner than the above described refractive and reflective systems with comparable f-numbers, with total diffractive optical system thicknesses ranging from about 3 to about 50 microns (preferably, from about 5 to about 10 microns).
The inventive diffractive optical system employs diffractive focusing elements made using the same materials identified for the focusing elements used in the above described refractive and reflective systems. These diffractive focusing elements have preferred widths/base diameters of less than about 100 microns (more preferably, less than about 75 microns, and most preferably, from about 15 to about 50 microns).
These diffractive focusing elements are selected from the group of diffractive Fresnel lenses, Fresnel zone plate lenses, and hybrid refractive/diffractive lenses, and combinations thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, diffractive Fresnel lenses are used, each such lens having a series of concentric annular rings with a common focus. The concentric rings lie in a common plane making each lens extremely flat compared to refractive lenses with similar f-numbers. The successive rings may have continuous curvature for maximum efficiency or the curvature may be approximated by any number of steps or phase levels. The simplest diffractive Fresnel lens approximation has only two steps and is known as a Fresnel Zone Plate or Binary Fresnel Lens. More complex approximations, in increased order of complexity, are quaternary, eight levels, sixteen levels, and analog. In a preferred embodiment, the diffractive Fresnel lens is an analog profile lens.
The structured image icons used in the inventive diffractive optical system are similar to those used in the above described refractive and reflective systems.
Diffractive focusing elements are known to be sensitive to wavelength changes and suffer from high chromatic aberration. In the inventive system, however, the diffractive focusing elements may be either transmissive (see diffractive optical system 78 in
The optionally transferable transmissive diffractive optical system 78 is produced using the same method and material construction as the first exemplary embodiment, except that the geometry of the refractive lens mold is replaced with a geometry suitable for producing a diffractive lens. This optical system can also be transferred from its carrier substrate using the technique detailed in the second exemplary embodiment.
The optionally transferable reflective mode diffractive optical system 80 is produced using the same method and material construction as the third exemplary embodiment, except that the geometry of the reflective lens mold is replaced with a geometry suitable for producing a reflective style of diffractive lens, which is subsequently metalized. This optical system can likewise be transferred from its carrier substrate using the technique for reflective transfer detailed in the fifth exemplary embodiment.
The present invention further provides fibrous and non-fibrous sheet materials that are made from or employ the inventive system, as well as documents made from these materials. The term “documents”, as used herein designates documents of any kind having financial value, such as banknotes or currency, bonds, checks, traveler's checks, lottery tickets, postage stamps, stock certificates, title deeds and the like, or identity documents, such as passports, ID cards, driving licenses and the like, or non-secure documents, such as labels. The inventive optical system is also contemplated for use with goods (consumer or non-consumer goods) as well as bags, packaging, or labels used with these goods.
Other contemplated end-use applications for the inventive system include products for projecting larger dimension images such as advertising and multimedia displays (e.g., billboards, traffic and industrial safety signs, commercial displays for marketing or tradeshow purposes), products for enhancing a vehicle's appearance (e.g., decal, wrap), decorative wrap and wallpaper, shower curtains, artistic displays, and the like.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/525,239, filed Aug. 19, 2011, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/051394 | 8/17/2012 | WO | 00 | 5/2/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/028534 | 2/28/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
992151 | Berthon | May 1911 | A |
1824353 | Jensen | Sep 1931 | A |
1849036 | Ernst | Mar 1932 | A |
1942841 | Shimizu | Jan 1934 | A |
2268351 | Tanaka | Dec 1941 | A |
2355902 | Berg | Aug 1944 | A |
2432896 | Hotchner | Dec 1947 | A |
2888855 | Tanaka | Jun 1959 | A |
2992103 | Land et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
3122853 | Koonz | Mar 1964 | A |
3241429 | Rice et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3264164 | Jerothe | Aug 1966 | A |
3312006 | Rowland | Apr 1967 | A |
3357772 | Rowland | Dec 1967 | A |
3357773 | Rowland | Dec 1967 | A |
3463581 | Clay | Aug 1969 | A |
3609035 | Ataka | Sep 1971 | A |
3643361 | Eaves | Nov 1972 | A |
3704068 | Waly | Nov 1972 | A |
3801183 | Sevelin et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3811213 | Eaves | May 1974 | A |
3887742 | Reinnagel | Jun 1975 | A |
4025673 | Reinnagel | May 1977 | A |
4073650 | Yevick | Feb 1978 | A |
4082426 | Brown | Apr 1978 | A |
4185191 | Stauffer | Jan 1980 | A |
4345833 | Siegmund | Aug 1982 | A |
4417784 | Knop et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4498736 | Griffin | Feb 1985 | A |
4507349 | Fromson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4519632 | Parkinson et al. | May 1985 | A |
4534398 | Crane | Aug 1985 | A |
4634220 | Hockert et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4645301 | Orensteen et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4662651 | Mowry, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
4688894 | Hockert | Aug 1987 | A |
4691993 | Porter et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4756972 | Kloosterboer et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4765656 | Becker et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4814594 | Drexler | Mar 1989 | A |
4892336 | Kaule et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4892385 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4920039 | Fotland et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4935335 | Fotland | Jun 1990 | A |
4988126 | Heckenkamp et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5044707 | Mallik | Sep 1991 | A |
5074649 | Hamanaka | Dec 1991 | A |
5085514 | Mallik et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5135262 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142383 | Mallik | Aug 1992 | A |
5211424 | Bliss | May 1993 | A |
5215864 | Laakmann | Jun 1993 | A |
5232764 | Oshima | Aug 1993 | A |
5254390 | Lu | Oct 1993 | A |
5282650 | Smith et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5359454 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5384861 | Mattson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393099 | D'Amato | Feb 1995 | A |
5393590 | Caspari | Feb 1995 | A |
5413839 | Chatwin et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433807 | Heckenkamp et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438928 | Chatwin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449200 | Andric et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460679 | Abdel-Kader | Oct 1995 | A |
5461495 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464690 | Boswell | Nov 1995 | A |
5468540 | Lu | Nov 1995 | A |
5479507 | Anderson | Dec 1995 | A |
5492370 | Chatwin et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503902 | Steenblik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5538753 | Antes et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543942 | Mizuguchi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555476 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5567276 | Boehm et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568313 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574083 | Brown et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575507 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5598281 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5623347 | Pizzanelli | Apr 1997 | A |
5623368 | Calderini et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626969 | Joson | May 1997 | A |
5631039 | Knight et al. | May 1997 | A |
5639126 | Dames et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642226 | Rosenthal | Jun 1997 | A |
5643678 | Boswell | Jul 1997 | A |
5670003 | Boswell | Sep 1997 | A |
5670096 | Lu | Sep 1997 | A |
5674580 | Boswell | Oct 1997 | A |
5688587 | Burchard et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695346 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712731 | Drinkwater et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5723200 | Oshima | Mar 1998 | A |
5731064 | Süss | Mar 1998 | A |
5737126 | Lawandy | Apr 1998 | A |
5753349 | Boswell | May 1998 | A |
5759683 | Boswell | Jun 1998 | A |
5763349 | Zandona | Jun 1998 | A |
5783017 | Boswell | Jul 1998 | A |
5783275 | Mück et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800907 | Yumoto | Sep 1998 | A |
5810957 | Boswell | Sep 1998 | A |
5812313 | Johansen | Sep 1998 | A |
5886798 | Staub et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5933276 | Magee | Aug 1999 | A |
5949420 | Terlutter | Sep 1999 | A |
5995638 | Amidror | Nov 1999 | A |
6030691 | Burchard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036230 | Fárber | Mar 2000 | A |
6036233 | Braun et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060143 | Tompkin | May 2000 | A |
6084713 | Rosenthal | Jul 2000 | A |
6089614 | Howland et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106950 | Searle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6176582 | Grasnick | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177953 | Vachette et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179338 | Bergmann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195150 | Silverbrook | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6249588 | Amidror et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256149 | Rolfe | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256150 | Rosenthal | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283509 | Braun et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288842 | Florczak et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297911 | Nishikawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301363 | Mowry, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302989 | Kaule | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328342 | Belousov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329040 | Oshima et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329987 | Gottfried et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345104 | Rhoads | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348999 | Summersgill et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350036 | Hannington et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369947 | Staub et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373965 | Liang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381071 | Dona et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404555 | Nishikawa | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405464 | Gulick, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414794 | Rosenthal | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424467 | Goggins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433844 | Li | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450540 | Kim | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467810 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473238 | Daniell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483644 | Gottfried et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500526 | Hannington | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6521324 | Debe et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542646 | Bar-Yona | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558009 | Hannington et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587276 | Daniell | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616803 | Isherwood et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618201 | Nishikawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641270 | Hannington et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671095 | Summersgill et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6712399 | Drinkwater et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721101 | Daniell | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724536 | Magee | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726858 | Andrews | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6751024 | Rosenthal | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761377 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6795250 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803088 | Kaminsky et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819775 | Amidror et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833960 | Scarbrough et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6856462 | Scarbrough et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6935756 | Sewall et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6870681 | Magee | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6900944 | Tomczyk | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7030997 | Neureuther et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058202 | Amidror | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068434 | Florczak et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7114750 | Alasia et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7194105 | Hersch et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7246824 | Hudson | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254265 | Naske et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255911 | Lutz et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7288320 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7333268 | Steenblik et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336422 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7372631 | Ozawa | May 2008 | B2 |
7389939 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7422781 | Gosselin | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7457038 | Dolgoff | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457039 | Raymond et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468842 | Steenblik et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7504147 | Hannington | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7545567 | Tomczyk | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7609450 | Niemuth | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7630954 | Adamczyk et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686187 | Pottish et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712623 | Wentz et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719733 | Schilling et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7738175 | Steenblik et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751608 | Hersch et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762591 | Schilling et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763179 | Levy et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7812935 | Cowburn et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820269 | Staub et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7830627 | Commander | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849993 | Finkenzeller et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8027093 | Commander et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8057980 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8111463 | Endle et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8149511 | Kaule et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8241732 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284492 | Crane et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8514492 | Schilling et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528941 | Dórfler et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8537470 | Endle et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8557369 | Hoffmúller et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8693101 | Tomczyk et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8867134 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8908276 | Holmes | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010048968 | Cox et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020014967 | Crane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020114078 | Halle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020185857 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030031861 | Reiter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030112523 | Daniell | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030137740 | Hannington | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157211 | Tsunetomo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179364 | Steenblik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183695 | Labrec et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030228014 | Alasia et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232179 | Steenblik et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234294 | Uchihiro et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040020086 | Hudson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022967 | Lutz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065743 | Doublet | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100707 | Kay et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040140665 | Scarbrough et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040209049 | Bak | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050094274 | Souparis | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104364 | Keller et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161501 | Giering et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180020 | Steenblik et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050247794 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003295 | Hersch et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011449 | Knoll | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017979 | Goggins | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018021 | Tomkins et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060061267 | Yamasaki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060227427 | Dolgoff | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070058260 | Steenblik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092680 | Chaffins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070164555 | Mang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183045 | Shilling et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183047 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070273143 | Crane et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284546 | Ryzi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291362 | Hill et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080080058 | Raymond | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130018 | Steenblik et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143095 | Isherwood et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160226 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080182084 | Tompkin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090008923 | Kaule | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061159 | Staub et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090243278 | Camus et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090290221 | Hansen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310470 | Yrjonen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315316 | Staub et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001508 | Tompkin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018644 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045024 | Attner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100068459 | Wang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084851 | Schilling | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103527 | Endle | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109317 | Huffmuller et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100177094 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182221 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194532 | Kaule | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208036 | Kaule | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100308571 | Steenblik et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328922 | Peters et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110017498 | Lauffer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019283 | Steenblik et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110056638 | Rosset | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110179631 | Gates et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120019607 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120033305 | Moon et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120091703 | Maguire et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098249 | Rahm et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105928 | Camus et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120194916 | Cape et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120243744 | Camus et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130003354 | Meis | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010048 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038942 | Holmes | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044362 | Commander et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130154250 | Dunn et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140174306 | Wening et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175785 | Kaule et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140353959 | Lochbihler | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140367957 | Jordan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160176221 | Holmes | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160257159 | Attner et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009278275 | Jul 2012 | AU |
2741298 | Apr 2010 | CA |
1102865 | May 1995 | CN |
1126970 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1950570 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101678664 | Mar 2010 | CN |
19804858 | Aug 1999 | DE |
19932240 | Jan 2001 | DE |
10100692 | Aug 2004 | DE |
0090130 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0092691 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0118222 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0156460 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0203752 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0253089 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0318717 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0415230 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0319157 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0801324 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0887699 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0930174 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0997750 | May 2000 | EP |
1356952 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1002640 | May 2004 | EP |
1354925 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1659449 | May 2006 | EP |
1743778 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1876028 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1897700 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1931827 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2335937 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2338682 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2162294 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2803939 | Jul 2001 | FR |
2952194 | May 2011 | FR |
1095286 | Dec 1967 | GB |
2103669 | Feb 1983 | GB |
2362493 | Nov 2001 | GB |
2395724 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2433470 | Jun 2007 | GB |
2490780 | Nov 2012 | GB |
41-004953 | Mar 1966 | JP |
46-022600 | Aug 1971 | JP |
04-234699 | Aug 1992 | JP |
H05-508119 | Nov 1993 | JP |
10-035083 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-039108 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11-501590 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-189000 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-056103 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-233563 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-256994 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-055000 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-516899 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-324949 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003-039583 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-165289 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-528349 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-326876 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-262144 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-317636 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-193501 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2007-514188 | May 2007 | JP |
2009-012319 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-262375 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009-274293 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2011-502811 | Jan 2011 | JP |
10-0194536 | Jun 1999 | KR |
2002170350000 | Mar 2001 | KR |
2003119050000 | May 2003 | KR |
1005443000000 | Jan 2006 | KR |
1005613210000 | Mar 2006 | KR |
2111125 | May 1998 | RU |
2245566 | Jan 2005 | RU |
2010101854 | Jul 2011 | RU |
575740 | Feb 2004 | TW |
WO 1992008998 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 1992019994 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 1993024332 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 1996035971 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 1997019820 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 1997044769 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 1998013211 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 1998015418 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 1999014725 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 1999023513 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 1998026373 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 1999026793 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 1999066356 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 2001007268 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2001011591 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2001039138 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 2001053113 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 2001063341 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2001071410 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 2002040291 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2002043012 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2002101669 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2003005075 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003007276 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003022598 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2003053713 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003061980 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003061983 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003082598 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2003098188 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004022355 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004036507 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004087430 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005052650 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106601 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006029744 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2007133613 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2007076952 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2009000527 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009000528 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009000529 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009000530 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009121784 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010015383 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010094691 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010113114 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2010136339 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011015384 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011019912 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011044704 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2011051669 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011107793 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011122943 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027779 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103441 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013028534 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013093848 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013098513 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Drinkwater, K. John, et al., “Development and applications of Diffractive Optical Security Devices for Banknotes and High Value Documents”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 66-79, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Fletcher, D.A., et al., “Near-field infrared imaging with a microfabricated solid immersion lens”, Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 2, 2000, pp. 2109-2111, vol. 77, No. 14. |
Gale, M. T., et al., Chapter 6—Replication, Micro Optics: Elements, Systems and Applications, 1997, pp. 153-177. |
Hardwick, Bruce and Ghioghiu Ana, “Guardian Substrate as an Optical Medium for Security Devices”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 176-179, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Hutley, M.C., et al., “The Moiré Magnifier”, Pure Appl. Opt. 3, 1994, pp. 133-142, IOP Publishing Ltd., UK. |
Hutley, M.C., “Integral Photography, Superlenses and the Moiré Magnifier”, European Optical Society, 1993, pp. 72-75, vol. 2, UK. |
Hutley, M., et al., “Microlens Arrays”, Physics World, Jul. 1991, pp. 27-32. |
Kamal, H., et al., “Properties of Moiré Magnifiers”, Opt. Eng., Nov. 1998, pp. 3007-3014, vol. 37, No. 11. |
Leech, Patrick W., et al., Printing via hot embossing of optically variable images in thermoplastic acrylic lacquer, Microelectronic Engineering, 2006, pp. 1961-1965, vol. 83, No. 10, Elsevier Publishers BV, Amsterdam, NL. |
Lippmann, G., “Photgraphie—Épreuves Réversibles, Photographies Intégrals”, Académie des Sciences, 1908, pp. 446-451, vol. 146, Paris. |
Liu, S., et al., “Artistic Effects and Application of Moiré Patterns in Security Holograms”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1995, pp. 4700-4702, vol. 34, No. 22. |
Phillips, Roger W., et al., Security Enhancement of Holograms with Interference Coatings, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 304-316, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Steenblik, Richard A., et al., UNISON Micro-optic Security Film, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, 2004, pp. 321-327, SPIE vol. 5310, San Jose, CA. |
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 1994, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA. |
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 1998, 2nd edition, pp. 232-235, 240-241 and 320-321, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA (ISBN 0-89006-982-4). |
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 2005, 3rd edition, pp. 62-169, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA (ISBN 1-58053-258-6). |
Wolpert, Gary R., Design and development of an effective optical variable device based security system incorporating additional synergistic security technologies, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 55-61, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Zhang, X., et al., “Concealed Holographic Coding for Security Applications by Using a Moiré Technique”, Applied Optics, Nov. 1997, pp. 8096-8097, vol. 36, No. 31. |
Amidror, “A Generalized Fourier-Based Method for the Analysis of 2D Moiré Envelope-Forms in Screen Superpositions”, Journal of Modern Optics (London, GB), vol. 41, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1994, pp. 1837-1862, ISSN: 0950-0340. |
Article: “Spherical Lenses” (Jan. 18, 2009); pp. 1-12; retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.physicsinsights.org/simple_optics_spherical_lenses-1.html. |
Dunn, et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual Images for Security Applications”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, (published Jun. 3, 2004), Proc. SPIE 5310. |
Muke, “Embossing of Optical Document Security Devices”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, (published Jun. 3, 2004), Proc. SPIE 5310. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2018 in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-527203, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” Application No. EP 17176980.5, dated Aug. 26, 2019, 6 pages. |
IMPI—Mexican Institute Industrial Property, “Notification of 1st in-depth requirement,” Application No. MX/a/2014/001926, dated Jun. 11, 2019, 6 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection in connection with Japanese Application No. 2018-239264 dated Jan. 7, 2020, 4 pages. |
Egyptian Patent Office, “Notification of Office Action,” Egyptian Application No. D1PCT233/2014, dated Oct. 7, 2019, 10 pages. |
Brazil National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), “Report and Search Report,” Application No. BR112014003888-0, dated Dec. 26, 2019, 4 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notification in connection with Application No. CA 2,845,610 dated Mar. 22, 2019, 3 pages. |
Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC in connection with European Application No. 17176980.5 dated Jun. 25, 2020, 8 pages. |
Decision of Refusal in connection with Japanese Application No. 2018-239264 dated Apr. 28, 2020, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140376091 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61525239 | Aug 2011 | US |