Oral prophalaxis paste

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6280707
  • Patent Number
    6,280,707
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 15, 1998
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 28, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
An oral prophalaxis paste includes a preselected grade and amount of abrasive material such as pumice clay or diatimoceous earth. The abrasive material is moistened with water and a moisture retention agent such as glycerin is included. A curing system is employed, such as using sodium silicate and methyl salicylate. The formulation provides antimicrobial properties by the inclusion of triclosan.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Oral compositions containing triclosan are known. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,685, there is described an oral composition which includes an effective antiplaque proportion of triclosan in an oral composition. That composition is in the form of a tooth paste, gel dentrifrice, tooth powder, mouth rinse, mouth wash, tooth hardener, anticalculus composition, gum or lozenge. Such triclosan-containing compositions are known to exhibit an antibacterial effect in the oral cavity.




It has been found that the dentrifrice compositions heretofore known in the art are not useful as oral prophylaxis pastes (also referred to as “prophy” pastes). A main drawback has been that the prior dentrifrices contain low abrasive materials. This is because such dentrifrices are intended to be used on a daily basis. Therefore, prior to the present invention, there has not been a prophylaxis paste which exhibits antimicrobial properties and which is abrasive enough to be employed by the dental practitioner as a prophalaxis paste.




Therefore, a need exhibits for a prophy paste with acceptable abrasive qualities as well as antimicrobial qualities. The present invention, as will be discussed below meets this need.




DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION




It is therefore, an object of the invention to provide an oral prophylaxis paste.




It is another object of the invention to provide a prophylaxis paste with useful abrasive qualities.




It is a further object of the invention to provide such a prophylaxis paste which also exhibits antimicrobial properties.




These and other objects of the invention which will become apparent from the description to follow are accomplished by the invention as hereinafter described and claimed.




In general, a prophylaxis paste comprises a preselected amount and grade of pumice, clay, glycerin and an amount of triclosan.




PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION




The dental prophalaxis paste composition according to the invention is based upon a moistened pumice baseor clay base, normally containing an amount of pumice or clay, water and preferably a moisture retention agent in the form of glycerin.




The novel paste has a pumice base or clay base moistened to a pasty state. The exact amount of moisture added may be varied within reasonable limits because changing the moisture content in small amounts, although altering the paste consistency does not materially alter the characteristics which depend on the addition of further components. It has been found that the moisture retention agent may also be varied within reasonable amounts because its presence within a limited range does not significantly alter the desired flowing and non-splattering characteristics desired in the paste.




It is preferred to add glycerin and water to the pumice base in a weight amount ratio of about 16:8:4 of pumice or clay, glycerin and water. However, as indicated, the glycerin may readily range from about 6-9 parts to 16 parts of pumice, while the water can vary between about 4 to 6 parts per 16 parts of base without significantly altering the characteristics of the paste.




It will be readily understood that various substitutes for the preferred glycerin as the moisture retention agent could conceivably be made. Glycerin has been found to work effectively without detracting from the desired final qualities of the paste.




It is envisioned that a prophalaxis paste according to the present invention will be prepared as a fine, medium or coarse grit compound. These designations are relative, and are not necessarily intended to convey exact grades or grit levels. However, preferred explary compositions will be discussed below. The pumice or clay grade used in each of the different grit pastes is based upon the average particle size of the respective pumice. The table given below provides a grade designation and the average particle size in mesh, inches and microns.















PUMICE CLASSIFICATIONS
















PUMICE GRADE




MESH SPEC




INCH, MM




UM











4F




170 100% T




.0035, .090




90








200 99% T




.0029, .075




75








325 85% T




.0017, .045




45







3F




170 <1% R




.0035, .090




90








200 <8% R




.0029, .075




75







2F




140 <2% R




.0041, .106




106 








170 <9% R




.0035, .090




90








200 80-99% T




.0029, .075




75







1F




100 <1% R




.0059, .150




150 








120 <7% R




.0049, .125




125 








200 60-90% T




.0029, .075




75







0




 80 <2% R




.0070, .180




180 








100 <10% R




.0059, .150




150 








200 40-80% T




.0029, .075




75













NOTE 1: T = Passes through the sieve, R = Remains on sieve













A fine grit prophalaxis paste according to the invention will include about 40-50 percent by weight of pumice grade 4F. A medium grit paste will include from about 10-15% of pumice grade 3F and 35-40% of grade 2F. A coarse grit composition will contain for example, 35-40% by weight of pumice grade 2F and 10-15% of pumice grade 0. It is envisioned that other composition containing different grit levels are within the scope of the present invention. For example, a more coarse composition might include 35-40% of pumice grade 1F and 10-15% by weight of pumice grade 0. Again, other amounts of pumice or combinations of pumice may fall within a given designation, without varying from the scope of the present invention. Again, the designations fine, medium and coarse are relative and subjective.




With this understanding, fine, medium and coarse grit level compositions according to the invention may contain the following components.














TABLE 1













Grit Levels














Ingredient Name




(% w/w) Fine




Medium




Coarse









Purified Water




QS




QS




QS






Pumice 2F









36.60




37.57






Pumice 3F









12.60











Pumice 4F




45.20
















Pumice O














12.94






Dacalite




4.00
















Glycerin




29.80




30.77




30.06






Polyethylene Glycol 400




1.00




1.00




1.00






Triclosan




0.3-1.0




0.3-1.0




0.3-1.0






Sodium Fluoride




2.70




2.70




2.70






Sodium Silicate




2.86




2.86




2.63






Monosodium Phosphate




0.15




0.15




0.16






Methyl Salicylate




0.85




0.85




0.81






Sodium Saccharin




0.04




0.04




0.04






Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose




0.05




0.05




0.05






Colorant Solution




0.15




0.15




0.10






Flavor




0.82




0.83




0.81






TOTAL, %




100.00




100.00




100.00














Alternative compositions within the scope of the invention are provided in Table 2.















TABLE 2









Ingredient Name




(% w/w) Fine




Medium




Coarse


























Purified Water




13.237




11.222




10.948






Pumice




45.20




49.21




50.51






Glycerin




28.70




30.77




30.00






Distomacsous Earth




4.00
















Sodium Fluoride




2.78




2.70




2.73






Sodium Silicate




2.86




2.86




2.63






Polyethylene Glycol 400




1.00




1.00




1.00






Methyl Sallcylate




0.85




0.85




0.81






Flavorant




0.82




0.83




0.81






Triclosan




0.82




0.83




0.81






Sodium Phosphate Monobasic




0.15




0.15




0.16






Monosodium Phosphate




0.15




0.15




0.16






Sodium Saccharin




0.04




0.04




0.04






Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose




0.05




0.05




0.05






FD&C Blue #1









0.009











FD&C Blue #2









0.009











FD&C Blue #6




0.013
















FD&C Blue #40














0.012






TOTAL, %




100.00




100.00




100.00














To the pumice paste, containing pumice, glycerin and water, as discussed above, is added the sodium silicate, methyl salicylate and sodium carboxymethycellulose. The sodium silicate and methyl salicylate together form the curing system of the composition in the ratios of sodium silicate (3-4 parts) to methyl salicylate (0.25-1.25 parts). The sodium carboxymethylcellulose acts as a gum. Other materials may be included as a gum such as agar agar or the like. It has been found that these materials, when employed in the paste, act synergistically to create unique flow characteristics in the paste. By blending an amount of a gum system, such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, and a small amount of the curing system, that is up to about 2% by weight of the gum system and up to about 10% by weight of the cure system, the material will flow smoothly under pressure, without segregation or settling of the pumice.




Dacalite is also a useful grit material, as is diatomaceous earth. The polyethylene glycol is also a moisture retaining agent; sodium fluoride is known to be used as an anticarries agent; monosodium phosphate is a buffer; and sodium saccharin is added as a sweetener. Colorant solutions and flavoring agents are optional as are the sweetener and the sodium fluoride.











An example of the prophalaxis paste without the triclosan is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 3,228,845, which is hereby incorporated by reference for such disclosure. It has been found that the addition of the antimicrobial agent of triclosan in an amount of from 0.2 to about 1.2 percent by weight provides a dental prophalaxis paste with desirable antimicrobial properties.




The prophalaxis paste according to the present invention have abrasion values above those of the dentrifices currently known commercially. The abrasive ratings table provided below gives an example of the inventive prophy pastes and their relative dental abrasion (RDA) values as compared to commercially available dentrifrices.
















Products




Dentin Abrasion (RDA) Values
























Inventive Paste Fine Grit




704






Inventive Paste Medium Grit




256






Inventive Paste Coarse Grit




362






Crest Regular Toothpaste




81






Crest Tartar Control Toothpaste




126






Colgate Tartar Control Toothpaste




112






Aim Tartar Control Toothpaste




127






Aquafresh Tartar Control Toothpaste




125






Close-up Tartar Control Toothpaste




120














The RDA value as used in the present description, may be determined by any of the standard methods including the Grabensteder method or the Hefferen method. The Hefferen method is preferred because it is recognized by the American Dental Association. While the RDA is the method for evaluation the abrasive nature of normally, toothpaste, another method known as the relative enamel abrasion (REA) is normally used for evaluating prophy paste. There is no specific correlation between the recognized RDA and REA test methods. According to the present invention, a prophy paste having a REA value of preferably above about 3 is within the scope of the invention.




GENERAL EXPERIMENTAL




In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the present invention in carrying out the objects as set forth above, a number of formulations were prepared according to the present invention. Medium, fine and coarse grit formulations were prepared. Samples 1 and 2 contain medium grit pumice and 0.3% and 1.0% triclosan respectively. Sample 3 is a medium grit prophy paste available from DENTSPLY International Inc. As NUPRO. Samples 4 and 5 contain fine grit and 0.3% and 1.0% triclosan respectively. Sample 6 is a fine grit NUPRO prophy paste. Samples 7 and 8 are a coarse grit, 0.3% and 1.0% triclosan respectively formulation. Sample 9 is a coarse grit NUPRO prophy paste. The NUPRO prophy paste as used in these experiments are commercially available.




PROCEDURE




Culture Preparation






Klebsiella pneumoniae


and


Streptococcus mutans


were used in the assay. The cultures were maintained lyophilized prior to use.


Klebsiella pnumoniae


was grown on soybean casein digest agar (LMRS) at 37±2° C. for 18-24 hours. Streptococcus was grown on soybean casein digest agar with 5% blood (BAP) at 37±2° C. for 48-72 hours. The cultures were harvested in 0.9% saline to the approximate turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard.




Test Performance




The Klebsiella suspension was added to Mueller Hinton agar and the Streptococcus suspension was added to BAP with sterile cotton swabs using a three direction sweep (Kirby-Bauer method). Six plates were prepared for each organism.




The products were added to sterile ¼ inch filter paper discs using 10 mg per disc. Twelve discs were prepared for each product.




The discs were added to the inoculated plates. One disc containing each product on each plate. The Klebsiella plates were incubated at 37±2° C. for 18-24 hours. The Streptococcus plates were incubated at 37±2° C. for 48 hours. The diameters of the zones of inhibition were then measured for each product using a caliper.




RESULTS




Table 2 contains the results for the products against


Klebsiella pneumoniae


. Table 3 contains the results for the products against Streptococcus mutans. The tables also contain the average diameter of the zones of inhibition for each product against each organisms. The average zone of inhibition was calculated from six replicates. The products with a 0 mm zone diameter demonstrated inhibition directly under the sample only (no diffusion of antimicrobial activity).




The sample that showed the largest zone of inhibition against


Klebsiella pneumoniae


was Sample 5. The sample that showed the largest zone of inhibition against


Streptoccocus mutans


was Sample 8.















TABLE 2











Sample ID




Average Zone Diameter













1




37.6 mm







2




40.0 mm







3




  0 mm







4




38.6 mm







5




41.6 mm







6




  0 mm







7




36.5 mm







8




38.5 mm







9




  0 mm


























TABLE 2











Sample ID




Average Zone Diameter













1




37.6 mm







2




40.0 mm







3




  0 mm







4




38.6 mm







5




41.6 mm







6




  0 mm







7




36.5 mm







8




38.5 mm







9




  0 mm















Therefore, it is apparent that a prophalaxis paste according to the invention as described above, is useful in meeting the stated objectives of the invention. It will be understood that amount of various components, can be varied and still fall within the scope of the invention. Similarly, specific formulation components as provided above are merely explary, and other components similar or otherwise are also within the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention will be determined only by the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A dental prophylactic paste comprising a composition having a paste component and an antimicrobial component, wherein the prophylactic paste has a relative dental abrasion value of above 200, wherein said antimicrobial component comprises 2,2,4′-trichloro-2′-hydroxydiphenyl ether, and wherein said composition comprises from about 99.8 percent by weight of said paste component and from about 0.2 to about 1.2 percent by weight of said antimicrobial component, and wherein said paste component comprises a weight ratio of (a) about 16 parts of a dental abrasive selected from the group consisting of pumice, clay and mixtures thereof, to (b) about 6 to about 16 parts of a moisture retention agent, to (c) about 4 to about 6 part of water.
  • 2. A dental prophylactic paste as in claim 1, wherein said moisture retention agent is glycerin.
  • 3. A dental prophylactic paste as in claim 1, having a relative enamel abrasive value of above about 3.
US Referenced Citations (80)
Number Name Date Kind
3228845 Najjar Jan 1966
4144322 Cordon Mar 1979
4235874 Norfleet Nov 1980
4656031 Lane et al. Apr 1987
4824661 Wagner Apr 1989
4894220 Nabi et al. Jan 1990
4980153 Jackson et al. Dec 1990
5032386 Gaffar et al. Jul 1991
5037635 Nabi et al. Aug 1991
5037637 Gaffar et al. Aug 1991
5043154 Gaffar et al. Aug 1991
5080887 Gaffar et al. Jan 1992
5094845 Vlock Mar 1992
5096701 White, Jr. et al. Mar 1992
5130122 Tabibi et al. Jul 1992
5135738 Gaffar et al. Aug 1992
5145667 Ibrahim et al. Sep 1992
5156835 Nabi et al. Oct 1992
5165914 Vlock Nov 1992
5167951 Gaffar et al. Dec 1992
5176900 White, Jr. et al. Jan 1993
5178851 Gaffar et al. Jan 1993
5180578 Gaffar et al. Jan 1993
5188821 Gaffar et al. Feb 1993
5188822 Viccaro et al. Feb 1993
5192530 Gaffar et al. Mar 1993
5192531 Gaffar et al. Mar 1993
5192533 Elliott et al. Mar 1993
5208009 Gaffar et al. May 1993
5209251 Curtis et al. May 1993
5234688 Gaffar et al. Aug 1993
5236696 Catiis et al. Aug 1993
5236699 Libin Aug 1993
5256396 Piechota, Jr. Oct 1993
5256401 Duckenfield et al. Oct 1993
5260062 Gaffar Nov 1993
5273741 Gaftar et al. Dec 1993
5279813 Gaffar et al. Jan 1994
5288480 Gaffar et al. Feb 1994
5290541 Liang Mar 1994
5290542 Liang Mar 1994
5292502 Burke et al. Mar 1994
5292526 Gaffar et al. Mar 1994
5294431 Gaffar et al. Mar 1994
5296214 Gaffar Mar 1994
5312618 Gaffar et al. May 1994
5316758 Morishima et al. May 1994
5320832 Catiis et al. Jun 1994
5334375 Nabi et al. Aug 1994
5344641 Gaffar et al. Sep 1994
5348733 Morishima et al. Sep 1994
5354550 Collins et al. Oct 1994
5356615 Gaffar Oct 1994
5356803 Carpenter et al. Oct 1994
5368844 Gaffar et al. Nov 1994
5380530 Hill Jan 1995
5422098 Rolla et al. Jun 1995
5424059 Prencipe et al. Jun 1995
5445814 Liang Aug 1995
5453265 Gaffar et al. Sep 1995
5466437 Gaffar et al. Nov 1995
5472685 Gaffar Dec 1995
5474761 Liang Dec 1995
5496540 Gaffar et al. Mar 1996
5500448 Cummins et al. Mar 1996
5525330 Gaffar et al. Jun 1996
5531982 Gaffar et al. Jul 1996
5538715 Gaffar et al. Jul 1996
5571501 Toy Nov 1996
5575652 Gaffar et al. Nov 1996
5582816 Mandanas et al. Dec 1996
5605676 Gaffar et al. Feb 1997
5624906 Vermeer Apr 1997
5639445 Curtis et al. Jun 1997
5645841 Hill et al. Jul 1997
5651959 Hill et al. Jul 1997
5665374 Hill et al. Sep 1997
5670138 Venema et al. Sep 1997
5681548 Esposito et al. Oct 1997
5683678 Heckert et al. Nov 1997
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 161 899 Nov 1985 EP
9204884 Apr 1992 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15th edition, 1975Mack Publishing Co., Chapter 105, p. 1895.*
J. Osaka Univ., Dent. Sch.; vol. 35, 5˜11, 1995; “Antibacterial Effect of Composite Incorporating Triclosan against Streptococcus Mutans”.