Orally disintegrating tablets of atomoxetine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8747895
  • Patent Number
    8,747,895
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 9, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 10, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A coated multi-particulate pharmaceutical dosage form such as an orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) presentation for delivering atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor indicated for the treatment of ADHD, into the body to maintain a therapeutically effective amount of atomoxetine in the plasm. The dosage form may comprise one or more populations of coated atomoxetine-containing particles (beads, pellets, granules etc.) providing a pre-designed rapid release profile after a predesigned lag-time of about 0 to 6 hours following oral administration.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition preferably as an orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), comprising coated beads (taste-masked and/or pulsatile-release beads) of atomoxetine, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, suitable for oral administration for the treatment of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which includes inattention, hyperactivity and impulsiveness.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

According to the American Psychiatric Association, about three to seven percent of children have ADHD. It is estimated that about four percent of adults have ADHD. Although the disorder is not well defined in adults, symptoms in adults include a lack of organization, daydreaming, irritability, and lack of motivation. Atomoxetine, the first new drug to be developed for ADHD in three decades, has a different mechanism of action from the stimulant-like drugs, such as methylphenidate, currently used to treat ADHD. Unlike stimulant-like drugs, atomoxetine does not appear to have a potential for abuse, and hence, is not classified as a controlled substance. Strattera®, Eli Lilly's product containing atomoxetine has been studied in children, adolescents and adults, and has been found safe and effective. Atomoxetine is rapidly absorbed after oral administration with an absolute bioavailability of 63% in EMs (extensive metabolizers) and 94% in PMs (poor metabolizers). Maximal plasma concentrations are reached approximately 1 to 2 hours after dosing with an estimated elimination half-life of about 5 hours. In these trials (including open-label and long-term studies), 5% EM patients and 7% of PM patients discontinued for adverse events. Typical adverse events included abdominal pain, constipation, dyspepsia, nausea, and vomiting. A standard high-fat meal typically decreases the rate of absorption without affecting the extent of absorption, resulting in a 10-37% lower Cmax and delayed Tmax by 3 hours.


Strattera is available in 10, 18, 25, 40, and 60 mg strengths as an immediate-release capsule dosage form. Administration of Strattera is initiated at a total daily dose of approximately 0.5 mg/kg and increased after a 3-day period to a target daily dose of approximately 1.2 mg/kg administered either as a single daily dose in the morning or as evenly divided doses in the morning and late afternoon/early evening. It is estimated that 50% of the population have problems of swallowing tablets or capsules (see Seager in Journal of Phramacol. and Pharm. 50, pages 375-382, 1998); especially it is hard to medicate children who have difficulty or are unwilling to swallow capsules. This leads to poor compliance, even non-compliance, with the treatment and thus has a negative impact on the efficacy of the treatment. ADHD patients are frequently advised to take Strattera with food to minimize the occurrence of adverse events such as nausea. Atomoxetine in Strattera has an extremely caustic and bitter taste. The bitter taste of atomoxetine precludes the medication from being easily sprinkled onto foods such as applesauce, a commonly used method of administering medications to children. Hence, administration of Strattera in pediatric patients is especially challenging for several reasons. Capsule dosage forms become sticky when wetted by saliva, and if the patient experiences difficulty swallowing the capsule on the first attempt, then the capsule must often be discarded. Furthermore, if a capsule partially dissolves in the child's mouth, as can result from unsuccessful swallowing or the capsule getting stuck in an orthodontic appliance, the resulting very unpleasant taste can make it difficult to persuade the child to take another dose. Since the product is expensive, this has both compliance and economic drawbacks. In addition, since the medicine is typically administered in the morning before the child begins his or her school day, incidences of nausea can be particularly debilitating. As such, there is a significant need for developing a modified-release dosage form, the administration of which would minimize the occurrence of adverse events and improve patient compliance, thus encouraging patient's adherence to the prescribed dosing regimen. An ideal dosage form would limit gastric upset and be easy to administer to children. Such a dosage form should have delayed or modified-release properties, to avoid significant dissolution in the stomach and/or to avoid high plasma peaks associated with administration of immediate release dosage forms, and have an easy-to-swallow, good tasting, orally disintegrating presentation to achieve higher patient compliance.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Atomoxetine is a selective norepinehrine reuptake inhibitor. It is the R(−) isomer and chemically (−)-N-Methyl-3-(o-tolyloxy)-propylamine hydrochloride. Strattera™, Eli Lilly's product containing atomoxetine, is indicated for the treatment of children, adolescents and adults with ADHD symptoms. Atomoxetine is rapidly absorbed after oral administration and has a half-life of about 5 hours. The administration of the current product, Strattera, as a single high dose in the morning can produce adverse events in patients and other issues associated with the administration of capsules containing extremely caustic, bitter-tasting atomoxetine, resulting in discontinuation of medication in some cases. The present invention provides a modified-release dosage form, preferably an ODT (orally disintegrating tablet) comprising coated atomoxetine having modified-release properties produced using one or more coacervation, granulation, extrusion-spheronization and fluid-bed coating processes. In conjunction with certain embodiments of the invention lower incidence of non-compliance and adverse events including abdominal pain, constipation, dyspepsia, nausea and vomiting which are generally associated with high Cmax and/or irritation to gastric mucosa in the patient upon administration of high doses of immediate release dosage forms required to achieve therapeutic efficacy may be achieved.


One embodiment is an ODT (orally disintegrating tablet) comprising coated atomoxetine particles (crystals, granules, drug-layered or extruded-spheronized beads) by coating atomoxetine with an enteric polymer, a water-insoluble polymer or a mixture thereof to take advantage of the predictable transit time of small, membrane-coated inert particles in the gastrointestinal tract, independent of gastric motility. However, a conventional chewable or modified-release matrix tablet formulation comprising coated multiparticulates (taste-masked, delayed-release or modified-release beads) containing atomoxetine suitable for once-daily dosing is also within the scope of this invention.


The multiparticulate pharmaceutical composition comprising coated microparticles (crystals, granules, pellets or beads) may be produced by applying a polymer membrane on atomoxetine particles (e.g., particles having a coating of atomoxetine and a binder) for imparting taste-masking and/or TPR properties. In one embodiment, these coated TPR particles alone or in combination with taste-masked IR particles will be blended with rapidly-dispersing microgranules and other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients and compressed into an ODT. The ODT thus produced will disintegrate on contact with the saliva in the oral cavity forming a smooth, easy-to-swallow dispersion containing coated microparticles. These coated microparticles will provide a single or bimodal (two pulses separated by 2 to 6 hours) plasma profile over several hours as they transit down the gastrointestinal tract. The granules or beads suitable for membrane-coating by coacervation or fluid-bed coating may be produced using a granulation, extrusion-spheronization, or drug-layering process.


One embodiment of the present invention provides a unit dosage form of modified-release atomoxetine as an ODT that would release the drug into an aqueous environment in one pulse or in two pulses separated by about 2-6 hours under in vitro conditions. In one embodiment, the TPR beads may be produced by a fluid-bed coating process following the procedures disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,627,223, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Another embodiment of the present invention provides modified-release atomoxetine beads in the unit dosage form of an ODT (orally disintegrating tablet) which would rapidly disintegrate on contact with the saliva in the buccal cavity forming an easy-to-swallow suspension. The term “rapidly disintegrate” as used herein means that the ODT disintegrates in less than about 60 seconds. The directions for preparing rapidly-dispersing microgranules, blending these microgranules, modified-release (MR) atomoxetine beads (TPR beads alone or a mixture of taste-masked beads and TPR beads at a desired ratio) and other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients and compressing into tablets using a rotary tablet press are disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/827,106 filed Apr. 19, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference. In a preferred embodiment, the microgranules additionally contain a disintegrant and still more preferably a so called super-disintegrant such as crospovidone, croscarmellose sodium, low substituted hydroxypropylcellulose and sodium starch glycolate in amounts of about 0.1 to 10% of the tablet. These and other embodiments, advantages and features of the present invention will become more clear when detailed description and examples are provided in subsequent sections.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-section of a taste-masked bead in accordance with one aspect of the invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-section of a TPR bead in accordance with one aspect of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a theoretical drug-release profile for taste-masked beads and TPR beads in accordance with particular embodiments of the present invention;



FIG. 4 shows a theoretical drug-release profile for MR Atomoxetine HCl ODT, 60 mg of Example 5; and



FIG. 5 illustrates a theoretical drug-release profile for 60 mg Atomoxetine HCl ODT containing 20% taste-masked beads and 80% TPR beads of Example 6.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All documents cited are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention.


As used herein, the term “atomoxetine” includes the base, pharmaceutically acceptable salts, polymorphs, stereoisomers and mixtures thereof.


As used herein, the term “immediate release” refers to release of greater than or equal to about 50%, preferably greater than about 75%, more preferably greater than about 90%, and in accordance with certain embodiments greater than about 95% of the active within about 2 hours, more particularly within about one hour following administration of the dosage form. The term can also refer to the release of active after a lag time of little or no release that occurs with a timed, pulsatile release dosage form characterized by an immediate release pulse after the designed lag time.


The term “immediate release (IR) bead” refers to an active-containing core particle. Components of the dosage forms described herein, such as TPR beads and taste-masked beads, may be prepared by coating IR beads to modify the release properties or other properties of the IR beads. Accordingly, dosage forms containing beads prepared from IR beads may or may not include any unmodified IR beads in the finished formulation.


In one embodiment, the active core of the dosage form of the present invention may be comprised of an inert particle coated with a drug-containing film-forming formulation. The amount of drug in the core will depend on the drug, the dose, and the capsule size. Those skilled in the art will be able to select an appropriate amount of drug for coating onto the core to achieve the desired dosage. In one embodiment, the inert particle may be a sugar sphere, a cellulose sphere, a silicon dioxide sphere or the like. Alternatively, the atomoxetine-containing core may be produced by granulation and/or by extrusion-spheronization of a composition containing atomoxetine or its salt, a binder and one or more hydrophilic fillers/diluents.


In one embodiment, the drug-containing particle may be coated with a combination of a water-insoluble polymer and an enteric polymer to produce TPR beads with a lag-time (release with a delayed-onset) of approximately 1 to 6 hours upon oral administration. The water-insoluble polymer and enteric polymer may be present at a weight ratio of from about 10/1 to about 1/1, preferably at a weight ratio of from about 2/1 to 1/1. The membrane coating typically comprises from about 10% to about 60%, preferably from about 10% to about 30% by weight of the coated beads. Alternately, the drug core may simply be coated with an enteric polymer in the aforementioned amounts.


The unit dosage form according to the present invention may comprise TPR beads alone or in combination with taste-masked immediate release (IR) beads. Taste-masked IR beads will provide effective taste-masking in the buccal cavity and release atomoxetine in the gastrointestinal tract within approximately 2 hours, preferably within one hour following oral administration. The TPR beads will release atomoxetine over a period of up to approximately 1-4 hours in the gastrointestinal tract after a lag time of about 1-6 hours following oral administration.


One embodiment of the invention also provides a method of making an ODT (orally disintegrating tablet) dosage form comprising TPR beads alone or a mixture of taste-masked IR beads and TPR beads at a ratio of from about 30/70 to about 0/100, more particularly from about 20/80 to about 10/90 (IR beads/TPR beads). In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the method may include the steps of:

    • a. coating an inert particle (a sugar sphere, a cellulose sphere, a silicon dioxide sphere) with atomoxetine and a binder to form an active drug particle (IR bead);
    • b. coating IR bead with a solution of an enteric polymer such as HPMCP (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate) or a mixture of a water-insoluble polymer such as EC (ethylcellulose) and an enteric polymer at a ratio of about 10:1 to 1:1 to form a timed pulsatile-release drug particle (TPR bead);
    • c. when present, taste-masking IR beads by encapsulation with a water-insoluble polymer, such as ethylcellulose, by solvent coacervation or fluid-bed coating;
    • d. granulating a powder mixture of a sugar alcohol such as mannitol or a saccharide such as lactose and crospovidone, for example, using the disclosure in the co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/827,106 filed Apr. 19, 2004 to produce rapidly-dispersing microgranules;
    • e. blending TPR beads from step (b) alone or in combination with taste-masked IR beads from step (c) at a ratio of from about 70/30 to about 100/0, more particularly from about 80/20 to about 90/10 to provide a desired plasma profile, rapidly-dispersing microgranules from step (d) and other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients; and
    • f. compressing the blend from step (e) into orally disintegrating tablets comprising required dose of atomoxetine, which would rapidly disintegrate on contact with the saliva in the buccal cavity forming a smooth, easy-to-swallow suspension and exhibiting a plasma profile suitable for the treatment of ADHD with reduced incidence of adverse events including non-compliance by once-daily dosing in the morning.


When tested in accordance with the United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution procedure (USP Apparatus 1, Baskets@ 100 rpm, Drug Release Test 1 using 700 mL of pH 1.2 buffer for 2 hours followed by additional testing in 900 mL of pH 6.8), the ODT would exhibit the following:

    • a release of not more than about 25% of the total atomoxetine at 2 hours;
    • a release of not less than about 75%, preferably not less than about 85%, of the total atomoxetine after 8 hours.


In one embodiment, an aqueous or a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent medium may be used for preparing drug containing core particles. The type of film forming binder that is used to bind the water-soluble drug to the inert sugar sphere is not critical but usually water-soluble, alcohol-soluble or acetone/water soluble binders may be used. Examples of suitable binders include, but are not limited to, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene oxide, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) at concentrations of about 0.5 to 10 weight % based on the drug-layered bead. The drug substance may be present in this coating formulation in solution form or may be suspended at a solid content up to about 35 weight % depending on the viscosity of the coating formulation.


The active containing cores (beads, pellets or granules) thus obtained may be coated with one or more gastrosoluble, water-insoluble and enteric polymers to obtain coated (taste-masked) beads with a desired sustained-release, enteric-release or timed, pulsatile-release profile.


The taste-masking of atomoxetine particles may be achieved by coating IR beads with a taste-masking coating. In accordance with certain aspects of the invention, the taste-masking coating comprises a water-insoluble polymer such as ethylcellulose for a weight gain of about 5% to about 40%, preferably from about 10% to about 30% based on the coated particle. Examples of other water-insoluble polymers that can be used include, without limitation, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, polyvinyl acetate, and ammonio methacrylate copolymers sold under the trademarks Eudragit® RL and Eudragit® RS. No plasticizer is needed for forming membranes on the IR beads for effective taste-masking. One method for imparting effective taste-masking characteristics is coacervation by phase separation of ethylcellulose in cyclohexane. Examples of such a coacervation process are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,865, which is incorporated in its entirety by reference.



FIG. 1 illustrates a taste-masked bead 10 comprising an inert particle core 12 coated with a layer 14 containing the active in a binder. The inert particle core 12 and coating layer 14 make up the IR bead. The taste-masking coating 16 surrounds the IR bead and provides taste-masking without significantly changing the immediate release properties for the bead.


The TPR membrane coating, which would largely control the onset of drug release, typically comprises a water-insoluble polymer in combination with an enteric polymer. The water insoluble polymer may be selected from the group, which includes ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, polyvinyl acetate, and ammonio methacrylate copolymers sold under the trademarks Eudragit® RL and Eudragit® RS. The enteric polymer may be selected from the group consisting of cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate succinate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (hypromellose) phthalate (HPMCP), hypromellose succinate (HPMCS), and methacrylic acid copolymers sold under the trademarks Eudragit® L and Eudragit® S. The ratio of water-insoluble polymer to enteric polymer for producing TPR beads may typically vary from about 10/1 to about 1/1, preferably from about 2/1 to 1/1, at a thickness of from about 10% to about 60%, preferably from about 10% to about 30% by weight of the coated bead.


A typical TPR bead 18 is illustrated in FIG. 2. The TPR bead 18 as shown includes an inert particle core 12, a layer of active agent and binder 14, a seal coat layer 20 and an external lag-time coating 22.


The membranes and coatings described herein may also include one or more plasticizers. Representative examples of plasticizers that may be used to plasticize the membranes include triacetin, tributyl citrate, triethyl citrate, acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate, diethyl phthalate, castor oil, dibutyl sebacate, acetylated monoglycerides and the like or mixtures thereof. The plasticizer may comprise typically about 10-30% or about 5-15% based on the weight of dry polymer, depending on the use of polymer dispersions or solutions.


In general, it is desirable to prime the surface of the active containing particle before applying the pulsatile-release membrane coating by applying a thin hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) film. A particularly useful plasticized HPMC seal coat is Opadry® Clear available from Colorcon. While HPMC is typically used, other primer or seal coats such as hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) can also be used.


Rapidly-dispersing microgranules useful herein can be prepared in accordance with the following procedure. One or more sugar alcohols and/or saccharides with an average particle size of not more than 30 μm and a disintegrant are granulated with approximately 20-25% water in a high shear granulator, wet milled, dried in a fluid bed equipment to produce rapidly dispersible microgranules of desired particle size (average particle size of not more than about 300 μm in accordance with methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Application No. 200100114340 published on Aug. 16, 2001). The sugar alcohol may be selected from the group consisting of mannitol, sorbitol, xylitol, maltitol and the like while the saccharide may be selected from the group consisting of lactose, sucrose, maltose or as a mixture of two or more, each of which is characterized by an average particle size of not more than about 30 μm. In one embodiment the sugar alcohol and/or saccharide is present in the tablet in an amount of about 30 to 70% by weight.


A disintegrant may be selected from the group consisting of crospovidone (crosslinked PVP), sodium starch glycolate, crosslinked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, calcium silicate, low substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose and mixtures thereof. The disintegrant is typically present in the tablet in an amount of about 1 to 10% by weight. The disintegrant has a particle size less than about 30 microns in one embodiment.


The present invention relates to multi-dose forms, i.e., drug products in the form of multi-particulate dosage forms (pellets, beads, granules or mini-tablets) or in other forms suitable for oral administration.


The following non-limiting theoretical examples illustrate the coated beads and ODT dosage forms comprising these coated beads manufactured in accordance with the invention would exhibit desired in vitro and in vivo drug release profiles and significantly reduce adverse events, resulting in improved patient adherence to dosing regimen and patient compliance.


EXAMPLE 1

IR Beads (drug load: approximately 20% as atomoxetine): Atomoxetine hydrochloride (960 g) would be slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (160 g Povidone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (2.8 kg) would be coated with the drug-layering formulation (1120 g) in a Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets would be dried, and a seal coat of Opadry Clear (80 g) would be applied.


SR Beads (drug load: approximately 17% as atomoxetine): Duplicate batches of SR beads would be produced by providing IR beads with a membrane coating of ethylcellulose (Ethocel Premium Standard 10 from Dow Chemical Company) plasticized with triethyl citrate for a weight gain of 7.5% (batch size: 4 kg) to demonstrate robustness of the manufacturing process.


EXAMPLE 2

IR beads of atomoxetine with a drug load of 20% (as atomoxetine) would be produced following Example 1.


Enteric Beads (drug load: approximately 18% as atomoxetine): Duplicate batches of TPR beads would be produced by providing IR beads with a membrane coating of hypromellose phthalate (HP-55 from Shin Etsu Chemical Company) plasticized with triethyl citrate at 10% based on the coating weight for a weight gain of 10% (batch size: 4 kg).


EXAMPLE 3

IR beads of atomoxetine with a drug load of 20% (as atomoxetine) would be produced following Example 1.


TPR Beads (drug load: approximately 18% as atomoxetine): The lag-time coating would be applied on IR beads (3600 g) by spraying a 98/2 acetone/water solution containing Ethocel (182 g) and HPMCP (160 g) and diethyl phthalate (58 g) to produce 4 kg of TPR beads with 10% lag-time coating.


EXAMPLE 4

IR beads of atomoxetine with a drug load of 20% (as atomoxetine) would be produced following Example 1.


Taste-masked beads (drug load: approximately 16% as atomoxetine): IR beads (3200 g) would be coated in a fluid-bed equipment with a plasticized ethylcellulose for a membrane weight gain of 20%.


EXAMPLE 5

IR Beads (drug load: approximately 25% as atomoxetine): Atomoxetine hydrochloride (1200 g) would be slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (200 g Povidone K-30) and mixed well. 60-80 mesh sugar spheres (2520 g) would be coated with the drug-layering formulation (1400 g) in a Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets would be dried, and a seal coat of Opadry Clear (80 g) would be applied.


TPR Beads (drug load: approximately 21.25% as atomoxetine): The lag-time coating would be applied on IR beads (3400 g) by spraying a 98/2 acetone/water solution containing Ethocel (273 g) and HPMCP (240 g) and diethyl phthalate (87 g) to produce 4 kg of TPR beads with 15% lag-time coating.


Rapidly-dispersible microgranules: The rapidly-dispersible microgranules comprising a sugar alcohol such as mannitol and a disintegrant such as crospovidone would be prepared following the procedure disclosed in the co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/827,106 filed Apr. 19, 2004. Currently, D-mannitol (152 kg) with an average particle size of approximately 20 μm or less (Pearlitol 25 from Roquette, France) is blended with 8 kg of cross-linked povidone (Crospovidone XL-10 from ISP) in a high shear granulator (GMX 600 from Vector) and granulated with purified water (approximately 32 kg) and wet-milled using Comil from Quadro and dried in Glatt GPCG 200. The rapidly-dispersible microgranules thus obtained would have an average particle size in the range of approximately 125-200 μm.


Atomoxetine Hydrochloride Orally Disintegrating Tablets: Rapidly-dispersible microgranules (16.17 kg) would be blended with TPR beads (3.0 kg) and other pharmaceutical acceptable ingredients (0.83 kg), such as flavor, sweetener, colorant, and additional disintegrant in sufficient quantity to provide a therapeutically effective unit dose, in a twin shell V-blender for a sufficient time to get homogeneously distributed blending for compression. Tablets weighing approximately 400 mg would be compressed using a production scale tablet press equipped with an external lubrication system at a mean hardness of about 7 kP. Atomoxetine Hydrochloride ODT, 10, 20 and 40 mg (as atomoxetine) would also be produced by blending appropriate amounts of the coated beads (weight proportional to dose strength) with rapidly-dispersing microgranules at a ratio of coated beads to microgranules of from about 1:8 to about 1:2 and compressing the blends thus obtained.


EXAMPLE 6

Taste-masked and TPR Beads: IR beads containing atomoxetine HCl at 25% (as atomoxetine) drug-load would be prepared following Example 5. Taste-masked IR Beads (drug load: approximately 20% as atomoxetine) would be prepared following Example 4. Also, TPR beads containing atomoxetine HCl at 21.25% (as atomoxetine) drug-load would be prepared following Example 5. The rapidly-dispersible microgranules comprising a sugar alcohol such as mannitol and a disintegrant such as crospovidone would be prepared following Example 5.


Atomoxetine Hydrochloride Orally Disintegrating Tablets: Rapidly-dispersible microgranules (16.13 kg) would be blended with taste-masked beads (785 g) and TPR beads (2.22 kg) and other pharmaceutical acceptable ingredients (865 g), such as flavor, sweetener, colorant, and additional disintegrant in sufficient quantity to provide a therapeutically effective unit dose, in a twin shell V-blender for a sufficient time to get homogeneously distributed blending for compression. 60 mg tablets weighing approximately 400 mg would be compressed using a production scale rotary tablet press equipped with an external lubrication system at a mean hardness of about 7 kP.


Drug Release Testing: The drug release profiles would be generated by dissolution testing per US Pharmacopoeia dissolution procedure (USP Apparatus 1, Baskets@ 100 rpm using 700 mL of pH 1.2 buffer for 2 hours followed by additional testing in 900 mL of pH 6.8).


Based on the analytical data, minor changes to the drug-loading and/or coating levels may be easily implemented. Using the already established manufacturing process for rapidly-dispersing microgranules, orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) will be produced and analytically tested to confirm the taste-masking and rapidly-releasing properties. Clinical studies will be conducted to confirm the beneficial effects that these new dosage forms bring to patients, especially to pediatric patients, thereby resulting in significant improvement in patient compliance and efficacy.


Changes may be made by persons skilled in the art in the compositions of various components of the finished dosage form (ODT) and/or in the steps or the sequence of steps of the method of manufacture described therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A multiparticulate pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) a plurality of timed, pulsatile-release (TPR) beads, wherein the TPR beads comprise drug-containing particles comprising atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof,wherein said drug-containing particles are coated with a TPR membrane comprising a blend of a water-insoluble polymer and an enteric polymer.
  • 2. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1 further comprising: (b) rapidly-dispersing microgranules comprising a disintegrant and a sugar alcohol or a saccharide or a combination thereof, wherein the sugar alcohol or saccharide has an average particle diameter of not more than about 30 μm, andwherein the pharmaceutical composition is in the form of an orally disintegrating tablet.
  • 3. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, further comprising taste-masked beads comprising IR beads coated with a taste-masking membrane, wherein said IR beads comprise atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and said taste-masking membrane comprises a water-insoluble polymer.
  • 4. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 3, wherein said taste-masked beads and TPR beads are present in said pharmaceutical composition at a ratio of taste-masked beads to TPR beads of from about 30:70 to about 90:10 by weight.
  • 5. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, wherein the ratio of rapidly-dispersing microgranules to TPR beads or the ratio of rapidly-dispersing microgranules to a combination of TPR beads and taste-masked beads is within the range of from about 9:1 to 2:1 by weight, and wherein said taste-masked beads comprise IR beads coated with a taste-masking membrane, and said IR beads comprise atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and said taste-masking membrane comprises a water-insoluble polymer.
  • 6. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 5, wherein said orally disintegrating tablet disintegrates on contact with the saliva in the buccal cavity within about 60 seconds.
  • 7. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said water insoluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, polyvinyl acetate, neutral methacrylate acid copolymers and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 3, wherein said taste-masking membrane comprises a water-insoluble ethylcellulose or polyvinyl acetate and the membrane is present in an amount of about 5% to about 40% based on the total weight of the coated bead.
  • 9. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said TPR membrane comprises a water-insoluble polymer and an enteric polymer at a weight ratio of from about 10:1 to about 1:1.
  • 10. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said TPR membrane is present in an amount of about 10% to about 60% based on the total weight of the coated TPR bead.
  • 11. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said TPR membrane further comprises a plasticizer selected from the group consisting of triacetin, tributyl citrate, tri-ethyl citrate, acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl sebacate, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, castor oil and acetylated mono- and di-glycerides and mixtures thereof.
  • 12. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said drug-containing particles comprise inert particles coated with atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof in a polymeric binder selected from the group consisting of hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone and mixtures thereof.
  • 13. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein said inert particle is selected from the group consisting of sugar spheres, cellulose spheres, and silicone dioxide spheroids.
  • 14. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, wherein said disintegrant is selected from the group consisting of crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, crosslinked sodium carboxymethylcellulose, sodium starch glycolate, low-substituted hydroxypropylcellulose and mixtures thereof.
  • 15. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2, wherein said sugar alcohol or saccharide is selected from the group consisting of mannitol, xylitol, sorbitol, maltol, lactose, sucrose and mixtures thereof.
  • 16. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 3, wherein said taste-masked beads release substantially all of the atomoxetine contained in said taste-masked beads within about 2 hours following oral administration.
  • 17. The dosage form of claim 16 wherein said TPR beads release substantially all of the atomoxetine contained in said TPR beads within about 4 hours following a lag-time of approximately 1 to 6 hours following oral administration.
  • 18. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, in the form of a dosage form containing a total of from about 10 mg to 60 mg of atomoxetine.
  • 19. A method for the preparation of multi-particulate pharmaceutical dosage form comprising the steps of: (a) preparing rapidly-dispersing microgranules by granulating a powder mixture comprising a sugar alcohol or a saccharide or a combination thereof having an average particle diameter of not more than about 30 μm and a disintegrant,(b) preparing TPR beads by applying to drug-containing particles comprising atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, a TPR coating comprising a combination of a water-insoluble polymer and an enteric polymer, thereby providing an in-vitro lag-time of about 1 to 6 hours,(c) optionally, preparing taste-masked beads by coating drug-containing particles with a water-insoluble polymer, thereby providing taste-masking properties,(d) blending rapidly dispersing microgranules from step (a), TPR beads from step (b) and optionally taste-masked beads from step (c), and(e) compressing the blend from step (d) to form an orally disintegrating tablet.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 wherein the drug-containing particles are prepared by layering atomoxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof from a polymeric binder solution on inert particles selected from the group consisting of sugar spheres, cellulose spheres, and silicon dioxide spheroids.
  • 21. The method of claim 19 wherein said TPR coating comprises ethylcellulose in combination with hypromellose phthalate.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein ethylcellulose and hypromellose phthalate are present at a weight ratio of from about 10:1 to about 1:1.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein said TPR coating is present in an amount of from about 10% to about 60% based on the total weight of the coated TPR bead.
  • 24. A method for treating a patient which comprises administering to the patient the pharmaceutical composition of claim 1.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 wherein said patient is a child or adolescent being treated for ADHD.
  • 26. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said enteric polymer is selected from the group consisting of cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate succinate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, hypromellose phthalate, anionic methacrylic acid copolymers and mixtures thereof.
  • 27. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein said TPR membrane provide release of the drug after a lag time of about 1-6 hours following oral administration.
  • 28. The method of claim 19, wherein the TPR beads provide a lag time of about 1 to 6 hours.
  • 29. The method of claim 19, wherein the method comprises (c) preparing taste-masked beads by coating drug-containing particles with a water-insoluble polymer, andwherein the ratio of TPR beads from step (b) to taste-masked beads of step (c) is about 70/30 to 100/0.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/609,312, filed Sep. 13, 2004, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (224)
Number Name Date Kind
3184386 Stephenson May 1965 A
3558768 Klippel Jan 1971 A
3885026 Heinemann et al. May 1975 A
4078051 Pomot et al. Mar 1978 A
4138475 McAinsh et al. Feb 1979 A
4248857 DeNeale et al. Feb 1981 A
4292017 Doepel Sep 1981 A
4305502 Gregory et al. Dec 1981 A
4369172 Schor et al. Jan 1983 A
4371516 Gregory et al. Feb 1983 A
4389330 Tice et al. Jun 1983 A
4389393 Schor et al. Jun 1983 A
4542042 Samejima et al. Sep 1985 A
4556678 Hsiao Dec 1985 A
4587118 Hsiao May 1986 A
4628098 Nohara et al. Dec 1986 A
4661647 Serpelloni et al. Apr 1987 A
4670459 Sjoerdsma Jun 1987 A
4689333 Nohara et al. Aug 1987 A
4698101 Koivurinta Oct 1987 A
4708867 Hsiao Nov 1987 A
4713248 Kjornaes et al. Dec 1987 A
4716041 Kjornaes et al. Dec 1987 A
4728512 Mehta et al. Mar 1988 A
4743248 Bartoo et al. May 1988 A
4752470 Mehta Jun 1988 A
4757090 Salpekar et al. Jul 1988 A
4760093 Blank et al. Jul 1988 A
4780318 Appelgren et al. Oct 1988 A
4786508 Ghebre-Sellassie et al. Nov 1988 A
4800087 Mehta Jan 1989 A
4803213 Iida et al. Feb 1989 A
4824675 Wong et al. Apr 1989 A
4832880 Staniforth May 1989 A
4840799 Appelgren et al. Jun 1989 A
4851226 Julian et al. Jul 1989 A
4851229 Magruder et al. Jul 1989 A
4863742 Panoz et al. Sep 1989 A
4871549 Ueda et al. Oct 1989 A
4874613 Hsiao Oct 1989 A
4886669 Ventouras Dec 1989 A
4892741 Ohm et al. Jan 1990 A
4894240 Geoghegan et al. Jan 1990 A
4898737 Panoz et al. Feb 1990 A
4915949 Wong et al. Apr 1990 A
4938968 Mehta Jul 1990 A
4946684 Blank et al. Aug 1990 A
4957745 Jonsson et al. Sep 1990 A
4968508 Oren et al. Nov 1990 A
4971805 Kitanishi et al. Nov 1990 A
4983401 Eichel et al. Jan 1991 A
5006345 Lang Apr 1991 A
5011692 Fujioka et al. Apr 1991 A
5013557 Tai May 1991 A
5013743 Iwahi et al. May 1991 A
5017122 Staniforth May 1991 A
5017381 Maruyama et al. May 1991 A
5026559 Eichel et al. Jun 1991 A
5026560 Makino et al. Jun 1991 A
5039540 Ecanow Aug 1991 A
5045321 Makino et al. Sep 1991 A
5073374 McCarty Dec 1991 A
5075114 Roche Dec 1991 A
5079018 Ecanow Jan 1992 A
5082669 Shirai et al. Jan 1992 A
5084278 Mehta Jan 1992 A
5093132 Makino et al. Mar 1992 A
5104648 Denton et al. Apr 1992 A
5112616 McCarty May 1992 A
5133974 Paradissis et al. Jul 1992 A
5137733 Noda et al. Aug 1992 A
5149542 Valducci Sep 1992 A
5160680 Serpelloni et al. Nov 1992 A
5169640 France et al. Dec 1992 A
5178878 Wehling et al. Jan 1993 A
5204121 Bucheler et al. Apr 1993 A
5211957 Hagemann et al. May 1993 A
5213808 Bar-Shalom et al. May 1993 A
5229131 Amidon et al. Jul 1993 A
5229135 Philippon et al. Jul 1993 A
5238686 Eichel et al. Aug 1993 A
5252337 Powell Oct 1993 A
5256699 Murphy et al. Oct 1993 A
5260068 Chen Nov 1993 A
5260069 Chen Nov 1993 A
5275827 Spinelli et al. Jan 1994 A
5376384 Eichel et al. Dec 1994 A
5409711 Mapelli et al. Apr 1995 A
5433959 Makino et al. Jul 1995 A
5439689 Hendrickson et al. Aug 1995 A
5445829 Paradissis et al. Aug 1995 A
5464632 Cousin et al. Nov 1995 A
5466464 Masaki et al. Nov 1995 A
5470584 Hendrickson et al. Nov 1995 A
5472708 Chen Dec 1995 A
5478573 Eichel et al. Dec 1995 A
5489436 Hoy et al. Feb 1996 A
5501861 Makino et al. Mar 1996 A
5506345 Riley et al. Apr 1996 A
5508040 Chen Apr 1996 A
5529790 Eichel et al. Jun 1996 A
5536507 Abramowitz et al. Jul 1996 A
5567441 Chen Oct 1996 A
5576014 Mizumoto et al. Nov 1996 A
5609883 Valentine et al. Mar 1997 A
5612059 Cardinal et al. Mar 1997 A
5616345 Geoghegan et al. Apr 1997 A
5629017 Pozzi et al. May 1997 A
5639475 Bettman et al. Jun 1997 A
5643630 Hinzpeter et al. Jul 1997 A
5700492 Morimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5720974 Makino et al. Feb 1998 A
5738875 Yarwood et al. Apr 1998 A
5747068 Mendizabal May 1998 A
5762961 Roser et al. Jun 1998 A
5788987 Busetti et al. Aug 1998 A
5807577 Ouali Sep 1998 A
5837284 Mehta et al. Nov 1998 A
5837285 Nakamichi et al. Nov 1998 A
5837379 Chen et al. Nov 1998 A
5840329 Bai Nov 1998 A
5876759 Gowan, Jr. Mar 1999 A
5891474 Busetti et al. Apr 1999 A
5900252 Calanchi et al. May 1999 A
5908638 Huber et al. Jun 1999 A
5968554 Beiman et al. Oct 1999 A
6024981 Khankari et al. Feb 2000 A
6024982 Oshlack et al. Feb 2000 A
6033687 Heinicke et al. Mar 2000 A
6039979 Gendrot et al. Mar 2000 A
6096340 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6099859 Cheng et al. Aug 2000 A
6099863 Gilis et al. Aug 2000 A
6099865 Augello et al. Aug 2000 A
6103263 Lee et al. Aug 2000 A
6106861 Chauveau et al. Aug 2000 A
6106862 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6123962 Makino et al. Sep 2000 A
6129933 Oshlack et al. Oct 2000 A
6136345 Grimmett et al. Oct 2000 A
6139865 Friend et al. Oct 2000 A
6139877 Debregeas et al. Oct 2000 A
6153220 Cumming et al. Nov 2000 A
6162463 Lippa Dec 2000 A
6169105 Wong et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183776 Depui et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190692 Busetti et al. Feb 2001 B1
6221392 Khankari et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221402 Itoh et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228398 Devane et al. May 2001 B1
6269615 Amborn et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287599 Burnside et al. Sep 2001 B1
6316029 Jain et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328994 Shimizu et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344215 Bettman et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350470 Pather et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350471 Seth Feb 2002 B1
6365182 Khankari et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368625 Siebert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368628 Seth Apr 2002 B1
6372253 Daggy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6391335 Pather et al. May 2002 B1
6413549 Green et al. Jul 2002 B2
6420473 Chittamuru et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432534 Hayakawa et al. Aug 2002 B1
6465009 Liu et al. Oct 2002 B1
6465010 Lagoviyer et al. Oct 2002 B1
6495160 Esposito et al. Dec 2002 B2
6500454 Percel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500457 Midha et al. Dec 2002 B1
6509036 Pather et al. Jan 2003 B2
6531152 Lerner et al. Mar 2003 B1
6551617 Corbo et al. Apr 2003 B1
6579535 Valentine et al. Jun 2003 B2
6596311 Dobetti Jul 2003 B1
6602521 Ting et al. Aug 2003 B1
6627223 Percel et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641838 Pather et al. Nov 2003 B2
6660382 Nouri et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663888 Percel et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663893 Corbo et al. Dec 2003 B2
6740341 Holt et al. May 2004 B1
6897205 Beckert et al. May 2005 B2
7048945 Percel et al. May 2006 B2
8071128 Ohta et al. Dec 2011 B2
20010007680 Kolter et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010014340 Ohta et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010046964 Percel et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020054907 Devane et al. May 2002 A1
20020077348 Dean et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020142034 Shimizu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020187190 Cade et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030064108 Lukas et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030096791 Gupte et al. May 2003 A1
20030113374 Percel et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134884 Hazama et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030157173 Percel et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030161888 Fernandez et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030215500 Ohta et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040047906 Percel et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040121010 Hirsh et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122106 Ohta et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126427 Venkatesh et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040131682 Percel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040137156 Lee et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040242536 Khoo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050025824 Percel et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050118268 Percel et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050152974 Boehm et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050232988 Venkatesh et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050269722 De Luigi Brushci et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060057199 Venkatesh et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078614 Venkatesh Apr 2006 A1
20060105039 Lai et al. May 2006 A1
20060121112 Jenkins et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060233892 Hendrix Oct 2006 A1
20060246134 Venkatesh Nov 2006 A1
20060269607 Percel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070264358 Wittlin Nov 2007 A1
20080069878 Venkatesh et al. Mar 2008 A1
20090263480 Lai et al. Oct 2009 A1
20110212171 Venkatesh et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120128771 Venkatesh May 2012 A1
20120135076 Ohta et al. May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (100)
Number Date Country
0052492 Feb 1984 EP
0166440 Jan 1986 EP
0239361 Sep 1987 EP
0349103 Jan 1990 EP
0357369 Mar 1990 EP
0391518 Oct 1990 EP
0431877 Jun 1991 EP
0453001 Oct 1991 EP
0516345 Dec 1992 EP
0538034 Apr 1993 EP
0553777 Aug 1993 EP
0721777 Jul 1996 EP
0650826 Jun 1997 EP
0815931 Jan 1998 EP
0294493 Dec 1998 EP
0914818 May 1999 EP
0914823 May 1999 EP
1010423 Jun 2000 EP
0582396 Jan 2001 EP
1070497 Jan 2001 EP
1072257 Jan 2001 EP
1156786 Nov 2001 EP
1157690 Nov 2001 EP
1366759 Dec 2003 EP
0914823 Dec 2004 EP
2319498 May 2011 EP
2679451 Jan 1993 FR
2766089 Jan 1999 FR
2778848 Nov 1999 FR
2053787 Feb 1981 GB
8824392.8 Sep 1989 GB
2224207 May 1990 GB
41-11273 Jun 1966 JP
49-69819 Jul 1974 JP
55-129224 Oct 1980 JP
56-014098 Oct 1981 JP
61-143316 Jul 1986 JP
62-61916 Mar 1987 JP
62-50445 Oct 1987 JP
62-242616 Oct 1987 JP
62-246513 Oct 1987 JP
62-252723 Nov 1987 JP
63-162619 Jul 1988 JP
63-270624 Nov 1988 JP
1-503385 Nov 1989 JP
1-313420 Dec 1989 JP
2-500747 Mar 1990 JP
2-164824 Jun 1990 JP
2-172918 Jul 1990 JP
2-289512 Nov 1990 JP
3-240724 Oct 1991 JP
4-224517 Aug 1992 JP
5-271054 Oct 1993 JP
5-310558 Nov 1993 JP
653658 Jul 1994 JP
6-321790 Nov 1994 JP
7-69889 Mar 1995 JP
07-124231 May 1995 JP
8-503482 Apr 1996 JP
8-175978 Jul 1996 JP
2002-154948 May 2002 JP
2003-522141 Jul 2003 JP
2005-508922 Apr 2005 JP
550608 Nov 2005 NZ
554346 May 2006 NZ
WO 8808703 Nov 1988 WO
WO 8808704 Nov 1988 WO
WO 9210173 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9300097 Jan 1993 WO
9312769 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9313758 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9315724 Aug 1993 WO
9408576 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9412180 Jun 1994 WO
9741878 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9747287 Dec 1997 WO
9904763 Feb 1999 WO
WO 0025752 May 2000 WO
WO 0033821 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0042998 Jul 2000 WO
0051568 Sep 2000 WO
0059486 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0113898 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0172285 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0180829 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0213794 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0243704 Jun 2002 WO
02057475 Jul 2002 WO
02085336 Oct 2002 WO
03013492 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03039520 Mar 2003 WO
03026613 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03041683 May 2003 WO
WO 03043661 May 2003 WO
WO 03047552 Jun 2003 WO
WO 2004009058 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004022037 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004087111 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005097064 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2005105049 Nov 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (115)
Entry
Bergain, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2004;6(2) 93-94.
Kratochvil et al (Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 4, No. 7 (2003) pp. 1165-1174).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/213,266, filed Aug. 2005, Lai et al.
Chandra, “Examiner's first report on paten application 2005299490,” 2 pages, Australia patent application No. 2005299490 (Mar. 12, 2010).
Villa, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” 4 pages, from European Patent Appl. No. 05818156.1, European Patent Office (Feb. 25, 2011).
Walsh, “Examination Report,” 2 pages, from New Zealand Patent Appl. No. 589750, New Zealand Patent Office (Dec. 8, 2010).
Office Action, Mexico patent application No. MX/a/2007/004741, 3 pages, Mexico Patent Office (Oct. 12, 2010).
Welter, Office Action, 24 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,855, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Mar. 17, 2011).
Potenza, Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2005307052, 3 pages, Australia Patent Office (Mar. 15, 2010).
Schifferer, “Communication,” 9 pages, from European Pat. Appl. No. 10184903.2, European Patent Office (Mar. 17, 2011).
Ahmed, Office Action, 5 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Sep. 5, 2008).
Ahmed, Office Action, 6 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Apr. 15, 2009).
Ahmed, Office Action, 8 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Mar. 31, 2010).
Berko, Office Action, 6 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (May 23, 2005).
Fubara, Office Action, 4 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,052, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Dec. 1, 2003).
Oh, Office Action, 5 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Dec. 29, 2005).
Oh, Office Action, 6 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Dec. 12, 2007).
Oh, Office Action, 7 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Nov. 28, 2006).
Oh, Office Action, 7 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,848, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Jun. 13, 2007).
Villa, “European Search Report,” 5 pages, from European Patent Appl. No. 11171982.9, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Dec. 22, 2011).
Westerberg, Office Action, 11 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 11/500,892, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Mar. 26, 2010).
Westerberg, Office Action, 11 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 11/500,892, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Dec. 8, 2010).
Young, “International Search Report,” 2 pages, PCT appl. No. PCT/US11/20493, United States Patent and Trademark Office (mailed Mar. 23, 2011).
Young, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” 6 pages, PCT appl. No. PCT/US11/20493, United States Patent and Trademark Office (mailed Mar. 23, 2011).
Ahmed, Notice of Allowance, 8 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,271, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Sep. 24, 2012).
Bredefeld, Office Action, 28 pages, U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,653, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Aug. 28, 2012).
Albrecht, “International Search Report,” 6 pages, from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US02/31535, European Patent Office (Feb. 3, 2003).
Anwar et al., “Chronotherapeutic for Cardiovascular Disease,” Drugs 55(5):631-643 (1998).
Fubara, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” 3 pages, from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US02/31535, European Patent Office (Jun. 19, 2003).
Ishino et al., “Design and Preparation of Pulsatile Release Tablet as a New Oral Drug Delivery System,” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 40(11):3036-3041 (1992).
Nwokole et al., “Tolerance during 29 days of conventional dosing with cimetidine, mizatidine, famotidine or ranitidine,” Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 4(Suppl. 1):29-45 (1990) Abstract only.
Ohira et al., “Effects of Various Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists on Gastrointestinal Motility and Gastric Emptying,” J. Smooth Muscle Res. 29:131-142 (1993).
Rankin, “International Search Report,” 6 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, European Patent Office (May 8, 2003).
Ueki et al., “Nizatidine Comparably Enhances Postprandial Gastric Motility to Existing Gastroprokinetics in Dogs,” Jpn. Pharmacol. Ther. 28(11):925-930 (2000).
Uhl, “International Search Report,” 5 pages, International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2006/016538, European Patent Office (Feb. 27, 2007).
Uhl, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” 6 pages, International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2006/016538, European Patent Office (Feb. 27, 2007).
Yamahara et al., “Effect of release rate on bioavailability of control-release multiple unit dosage forms,” Yakuzaigaku 55(2):99-107 (1995).
Yamamoto et al., “The Effects of Nizatidine on the Function of Esophageal Motility in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD),” Jpn. Pharmacol. Ther. 28(5):419-424 (2000).
Young, “International Preliminary Examination Report” 6 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Apr. 27, 2005).
Young, “Written Opinion,” 5 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Jan. 13, 2005).
Zheng et al., “Influence of Eudragit® NE 30 D Blended with Eudragit® L 30 D-55 on the Release of Phenylpropanolamine Hydrochloride from Coated Pellets,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 29(3):357-366 (2003).
Zimmer, “European Search Report,” 3 pages, European patent appl. No. 01103129.1, European Patent Office (Jun. 9, 2001).
Zimmer, “International Search Report,” 4 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US01/04012, European Patent Office (Jun. 19, 2001).
“Low Substituted Hydroxypropylcellulose,” Official Monographs for Part II, 2001, NRF, JP, XIV, pp. 942-943.
Ahmed, “Interview Summary,” 2 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Jul. 29, 2008).
Ahmed, “Interview Summary,” 2 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed May 15, 2009).
Ahmed, “Interview Summary,” 3 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Sep. 8, 2006).
Ahmed, “Interview Summary,” 4 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Aug. 2, 2006).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 10 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Jan. 10, 2006).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 13 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Apr. 14, 2008).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 15 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Jun. 15, 2007).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 20 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Aug. 19, 2009).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 24 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Jun. 10, 2010).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 44 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Dec. 11, 2008).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 7 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Jun. 13, 2006).
Ahmed, “Office Action Summary,” 7 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Nov. 30, 2006).
Bauer et al., Pharmarzeutische echnologie, 5th Edition, 1997, Govi Verlag Frankfurt, pp. 164-166.
Bodmeier et al., “Theophylline Tablets Coated with Aqueous Latexes Containing Dispersed Pore Formers,” J. Pharm. Sci. 79(10):925-928 (1990).
Citation in the Third Party Observation in the Opposition of European Patent No. EP 0914818 B1.
Database WPI, Section Ch, Week 198748, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB; AN 1987-338131, XP002156870.
Duncan, “Examination Report,” 2 pages, from New Zealand Patent Appl. No. 554346, New Zealand Patent Office, Wellington, New Zealand (mailed May 20, 2009).
Experimental data provided by Opponent I the Opposition of European Patent No. EP 0914818 B1.
Fell, Letter to The Editor, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1968, vol. 20, pp. 657-658.
FMC Corporation Product Specification for Avicel PH, 2005.
Foreign non-patent publication from Japanese textbook, 1989, Hirokawa Publishing Co.
Foreign non-patent publication Sysmex No. FP30SCJ001.
Gordon et al., “Effect of the mode of Super Disintegrant Incorporation on Dissolution in Wet Granulated Tables,” J. Pharm. Sci. 82:220-226 (1993).
Gorman et al., An Evaluation of Croscarmellose as a Tablet Disintegrant in Direct Compression Systems, Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1982; vol. 8, pp. 397-410.
Handbook (Binran) of Granule, vol. 1, Ohmsha Ltd., p. 434 & 438 (May 3, 1975).
Kaneto et al., 2000, Latest Pharmacy, Hirokawa Publishing Co., 1 Edition, (Extract and English translation thereof).
Kawashima, “Low-Substituted Hydroxypropylcellulose as a Sustained-Drug Release Matrix Base or Disintegrant Depending on Its Particle Size and Loading in Formulation,” Pharm. Res. 1993, vol. 10(3), pp. 351-355.
Korblum, “A New Tablet Disintegrating Agent,” J. Pharm. Sci., Jan. 1973, vol. 62(1), pp. 43-49.
McKenna et al., “Effect of particle size on the compaction mechanism and tensile strength of tablets,” J. Pharm. Pharmacol. Jun. 1982, vol. 34(6), pp. 347-351.
McKetta et al., “Table of Contents,” Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design (1989).
McKetta et al., Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, “Organic Phase Separation Conservation,” p. 167 (1989).
Mitsuo et al., Pharmaceutics Manual, 1989, Pharmaceutics Manual, Nanzando Co. Ltd. (Extract and English translation thereof).
Observations issued by the European Patent Office on Aug. 16, 2002 regarding European Application No. 0914818 (Applicant Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd.).
Oh, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” 5 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, USA (mailed Aug. 24, 2007).
Opposition Documents related to European Opposition of EP 091481B1 (Opposition file history as of Mar. 9, 2009, excluding duplicative, purely administrative documents (97 pages total), as indicated in the accompanying Information Disclosure Statement submitted herewith).
Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press, Electronic Version, 2006, Mannitol.
Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press, Electronic Version, 2006, Lactose Monohydrate.
Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press, Electronic Version, 2006, Croscarmellose sodium.
Rudnic et al., “Some Effects of Relatively Low Levels of Eight Tablet Disintegrants on a Direct Compression System,” Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1981, vol. 7(3), pp. 347-358.
Rudnic et al., “Studies of the Utility of Cross Linked Polyvinlpolypyrrolidine as a Tablet Disintegrant,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 1980, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 291-309.
Sato et al., “Anticonvulsant effects of tigabine, a new antiepileptic drug: the profile of action in the rat kindling model of epilepsy,” Epilepsia 37(Supp. 3):110-111 (1996).
Schifferer, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” 3 pages, from European Patent Appl. No. 05851221.1, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Oct. 13, 2009).
Schifferer, “International Search Report,” 4 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, The Netherlands (mailed Jun. 1, 2006).
Schifferer, “Written Opinion of the International Search Authority,” 6 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Jun. 1, 2006).
Shangraw et al., “A new era of tablet disintegrants,” Pharm. Technol. 1980, vol. 4(10), pp. 49-57.
Spear, “Office Action Summary,” 16 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/356,641 (mailed Dec. 8, 2004).
Tirkkonen and Paronen, “Enhancement of drug release from ethylcellulose microcapsules using solid sodium chloride in the wall,” Int. J. Pharmaceutics 88:39-51 (1992).
Trottier and Wood, 2005, “Particle Size Measurement,” Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Extract of 1. Introduction; 2. Data Representation; 4. Measurement Methods; 8. Selection of Equipment).
van Kamp et al., “Improvement by super disintegrants of the properties of tablets containing lactose, prepared by wet granulation,” Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition; 1983, vol. 5, pp. 165-171.
Villa, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” 3 pages, from European Patent Appl. No. 05818156.1, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Jul. 1, 2009).
Villa, “International Search Report,” 4 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/038328, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, The Netherlands (mailed Sep. 15, 2006).
Villa, “Written Opinion of the International Search Authority,” 5 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/038328, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Sep. 15, 2006).
Vrornans et al., “Studies on tableting properties of lactose,” Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition; 1985, vol. 7, pp. 186-193.
Walsh, “Examination Report,” 2 pages, from New Zealand Patent Appl. No. 554240, New Zealand Patent Office, Wellington, New Zealand (mailed Jun. 9, 2009).
Ware, “Office Action Summary,” 12 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/147,374 (mailed Oct. 14, 1999).
Ware, “Office Action Summary,” 6 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/147,374 (mailed Jun. 30, 2000).
Ware, “Office Action Summary,” 6 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/147,374 (mailed Aug. 29, 2001).
Ware, “Office Action Summary,” 6 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/147,374 (mailed Jun. 4, 2002).
Ware, “Office Action Summary,” 8 pages, from U.S. Appl. No. 09/147,374 (mailed Apr. 18, 2001).
Welter, “Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief,” 4 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/248,596 (mailed Oct. 13, 2010).
Welter, “Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief,” 9 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,653 (mailed Sep. 27, 2010).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 25 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,653 (mailed Mar. 18, 2010).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 26 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/248,596 (mailed Mar. 19, 2010).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 26 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/213,266 (mailed Nov. 13, 2009).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 28 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/248,596 (mailed Jul. 10, 2008).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 28 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/248,596 (mailed Apr. 29, 2009).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 28 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/213,266 (mailed Apr. 6, 2009).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 29 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,653 (mailed Jul. 10, 2008).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 29 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,653 (mailed May 12, 2009).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 29 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/213,266 (mailed Jul. 10, 2008).
Welter, “Office Action Summary,” 33 pages from U.S. Appl. No. 11/213,266 (mailed Nov. 12, 2010).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060057199 A1 Mar 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60609312 Sep 2004 US