The present invention relates to devices for wrapping film material around products, such as for wrapping stretch film material around one or more goods supported on a shipping pallet.
Large products or collections of smaller products are often shipped and at least temporarily stored on shipping pallets that facilitate handling with a forklift. It is often desirable to wrap the products with stretch film material in order to hold them together during handling, and optionally to provide weather resistance with a waterproof layer of film covering the products. Typically the pallet-supported product(s) are rotated relative to a stretch film dispenser so that the stretch film is wrapped around the product(s) (and optionally also the pallet on which they are supported) in a continuous spiral pattern. The tension applied to the stretch film during wrapping affects the amount of stretch film used, and also affects how effectively the stretch film layer secures a group of products together and/or the effectiveness of the weather-resistant barrier formed by the stretch film. Some pallet wrapping devices employ costly sensors and powered actuators to achieve desirable tension in the stretch film during its application to palletized products. In addition, there are larger and smaller wrapping applications for products or articles (such as furniture, collections of vehicle parts, etc.) that are not necessarily supported on pallets, but in which similar wrapping with plastic film or stretch film material is uses to at least temporarily secure and/or protect the products or articles.
The present invention is an orbital wrapping machine, such as a pallet wrapper, that is capable of wrapping products (including palletized products) with stretch film at a suitable tension level, with relatively low-cost manual tension adjustment capability for the stretch film. This allows users to wrap a product or group of products in a cost effective manner, by allowing a user to quickly set the tension that will be applied to stretch film material as it is drawn off of rolls. The tension-setting mechanisms are easily serviced as needed, and low complexity helps to ensure reliable operation and short service times.
According to one form of the present invention, an orbital wrapping machine includes a wrapping wheel rotatably supported on a base, a drive system for rotating the wrapping wheel, a roll mount, and a film tensioning system. The wrapping wheel defines an interior wrapping chamber for receiving an object to be wrapped. The roll mount is positioned along the wrapping wheel and rotatably supports a roll of stretch film while permitting the roll to rotate about a roll rotation axis. The film tensioning system includes a friction material and a manual adjuster. The friction material is spaced from the roll rotation axis and engages an outer surface of the roll of stretch film at varying levels of pressure in response to the manual adjuster. The pressure of the friction material against the outer surface of the roll changes the frictional resistance to rotation of the roll as the stretch film is drawn off of the roll during a wrapping operation.
In one aspect, the friction material is in the form of an elongate strip having opposite ends positioned at opposite sides of the roll mount and the roll rotation axis, with a middle portion that engages the outer surface of the roll of stretch film.
In another aspect, the manual adjuster is a tensioner having a first end coupled to the wrapping wheel and a second end coupled to one of the ends of the friction material. The tensioner is operable to increase and decrease tension in the elongate strip.
In yet another aspect, the tensioner includes an elastic member and a length-adjustable member, configured so that the elastic member stretches in response to shortening of the length-adjustable member.
In still another aspect, the support base has a plurality of idler wheels that support the wrapping wheel, and the drive system includes at least one powered drive wheel for rotatably driving the wrapping wheel. Optionally, the drive system includes a drive motor at the support base, which drive motor is operable to rotatably drive the drive wheel.
According to another form of the present invention, an orbital wrapping machine includes a wrapping wheel, a drive system, a roll mount, and a film tensioning system. The wrapping wheel defines an interior wrapping chamber and a wheel axis through the wrapping chamber. The drive system rotates the wrapping wheel about the wheel axis. The roll mount is positioned along the wrapping wheel and is configured to rotatably support a roll of stretch film along a roll axis. The film tensioning system is positioned at the roll mount and includes an elongate strip of friction material and a manual tension adjuster. The strip of friction material has opposite ends coupled to the wrapping wheel at opposite sides of the roll axis, and further includes a middle portion for engaging an outer surface of the roll of stretch film. The manual tension adjuster is coupled to the elongate strip of friction material and is used to selectively increase tension in strip of friction material to thereby urge the middle portion friction material against the outer surface of the roll of stretch film at different levels of pressure when the roll of stretch film is rotatably supported at the roll mount.
Therefore, the orbital wrapping machine provides an economical device for applying stretch film at a desired tension level to objects or articles that pass through a rotatable wrapping wheel, with relatively low-cost manual tension adjustment capability for the stretch film. A user can quickly set the desired tension, and can readily service the wrapping machine as needed.
These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiment depicted therein, an orbital wrapping machine 10 includes a support base 12 mounted in a wheel housing 14, such as shown in
A manually-adjustable film tensioning system 30 is provided along the wrapping wheel 16, near each roll mount 24 (
In the illustrated embodiment, the adjustable tensioner 34 includes an elastic portion in the form of a pair of stretchable coil springs 36, and a length-adjustable portion in the form of nylon cable ties (also known as “zip ties”) 38. Coil springs 36 stretch in response to shortening of the respective cable ties 38, which also causes the tension to increase in the adjustable tensioner 34 and the friction material 32. It will be appreciated that many different devices or products may be substituted for coil springs 36 and cable ties 38. For example, rubber bungee cords having exposed elastic rubber or elastic elements wrapped in a cloth or fiber outer casing may be substituted for coil springs. It is further envisioned that a compressed gas spring may be substituted for coil springs, albeit at potentially higher cost. Suitable substitutes for cable ties 38 may include, for example, straps of woven webbing material combined with length-adjustment buckles, a turnbuckle system, threaded components, a ratchet-cable system, or substantially any other length-adjustable coupling device. Optionally, it is envisioned that an adjustable tensioner may combine resilient qualities with adjustable length, in order to reduce the part count of the adjustable tensioner. For example, a stretchable woven webbing material wound on a retractor spool may provide sufficient tension and adjustability for the friction material 32.
With a stretch film roll 26 mounted at a roll mount 24, the adjustable tensioner 34 is tightened or loosened by adjusting the length of the cable ties 38 that form the length-adjustable portion of the adjustable tensioner 34. As the cable ties 38 are shortened to increase tension in the friction material 32, the friction material 32 is pressed with increasing force against an outermost layer of the stretch film 28, in the direction that is radially inward toward the stretch film roll's rotational axis. It will be appreciated that when no stretch film roll 26 is present, such as shown in
Because the springs 36 are stretched when the stretch film roll 26 is installed at the roll mount 24 and the desired lengths of cable ties 38 are set, the springs 36 can generally maintain a suitable amount of tension in the friction material 32 for both a full stretch film roll (relatively large diameter) and a nearly empty stretch film roll (relatively small diameter). Because some variation in the tension applied to the stretch film 28 is usually tolerable during wrapping operations, the lengths of cable ties 38 (or other length-adjustable component) may be selected and set so that the tension in friction material 32 (and therefore, in the stretch film 28 being applied to the product being wrapped) is optimal when the stretch film roll 26 is approximately half empty. This will generally result in the tension being greater than optimal when the stretch film roll 26 is full (i.e., at its maximum diameter), and the tension being lower than optimal when the stretch film roll 26 is nearly empty (i.e., at its minimum diameter). However, the greater-than-optimal tension for a full roll and the lower-than-optimal tension for an empty roll may still provide acceptable levels of stretch in the stretch film 28 being applied to the product for the full roll of stretch material. If needed or desired, it would be possible to manually shorten the lengths of the cable ties 38 when the rolls 26 have been partially used and the wrapping wheel 16 is stopped, to more closely maintain optimal tension as the stretch film contents of the rolls are used up. Although it is envisioned and contemplated that more sophisticated tensioners, such as servo actuators or fluid-actuated piston actuators, may be used to maintain a constant or nearly-constant tension in the friction material 32 as the diameter of the stretch film roll 26 decreases during wrapping operations, these would typically be higher cost tensioners and may provide only marginally different performance compared to the film tensioning system 30 described herein.
In the illustrated embodiment, the friction material 32 is a generally rectangular and flat strip of natural leather having a width that is approximately one-third the length of stretch film roll 26, such as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, and as best shown in
A powered drive system 50 including an electric motor 52 is provided along the support base 12 to rotatably drive the wrapping wheel 16 relative to the support base, such as shown in
Support base 12 includes a rectangular base plate 58 that rests upon a floor surface (and may be bolted to the floor surface), or that may be elevated above the floor surface by a pair of uprights 60 associated with the wheel housing 14, such as shown in
Wheel housing 14 includes an upper housing portion 14a that is generally shaped as a semi-circle in an inverted-U (concave-down) orientation, and a lower housing portion 14b that is generally U-shaped with a concave-up semi-circular surface and squared lower region (
Accordingly, the orbital wrapping machine 10 provides a relatively simple and low cost system for wrapping individual products or articles, groups of products or articles, and/or shipping/storage pallets and their contents, with plastic film (preferably stretch film) that is properly tensioned during the wrapping operation. The wrapper 10 is operated by installing a desired number of stretch film rolls 26 at respective roll mounts 24, setting each film tensioning system 30 to achieve a desired frictional resistance against rotation of each roll 26, inserting one or more products or articles to be wrapped (including palletized products) into the wrapping chamber 22, attaching a free end of stretch film 28 from each roll 26 to the pallet or the product(s) or article(s) to be wrapped, and energizing the powered drive system 50 to spin wrapping wheel 16 around the article(s) or the pallet and product(s). The article(s) or pallet and product(s) can be moved along the rotational axis of the wrapping wheel 16 as it spins, to ensure adequate coverage of the product(s) with the stretch film 28. As the wrapping wheel 16 spins, the frictional force imparted to each roll 26 causes the stretch film 28 to stretch as it is drawn off its respective roll and results in compressive loads being applied to the article(s) or palletized product(s) to secure them, while also helping to ensure a weather-resistant layer of applied stretch film 28 when the wrapping operation is complete.
Changes and modifications in the specifically-described embodiments may be carried out without departing from the principles of the present invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/661,231, filed Apr. 23, 2018, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2963236 | Grosser | Dec 1960 | A |
3602452 | Sauer | Aug 1971 | A |
3669376 | Lucas | Jun 1972 | A |
3720385 | Staats | Mar 1973 | A |
3813052 | Swann | May 1974 | A |
3841055 | Takami | Oct 1974 | A |
3912189 | Bauer | Oct 1975 | A |
4044529 | Zelnick | Aug 1977 | A |
4050221 | Lancaster, III | Sep 1977 | A |
4079565 | Lancaster, III | Mar 1978 | A |
4110957 | Lancaster | Sep 1978 | A |
4166348 | Carlson | Sep 1979 | A |
4176805 | Jackson | Dec 1979 | A |
4178734 | Lancaster | Dec 1979 | A |
4232501 | Stackhouse | Nov 1980 | A |
4302920 | Lancaster | Dec 1981 | A |
4317322 | Lancaster | Mar 1982 | A |
4418510 | Lancaster, III | Dec 1983 | A |
4422592 | Swope | Dec 1983 | A |
4448363 | Mukenschnabl | May 1984 | A |
4484717 | Goldstein | Nov 1984 | A |
4524568 | Lancaster | Jun 1985 | A |
4545182 | McDowell, Jr. | Oct 1985 | A |
4549388 | Lancaster | Oct 1985 | A |
4553374 | Lancaster | Nov 1985 | A |
4593518 | Lancaster | Jun 1986 | A |
4610403 | Goekler | Sep 1986 | A |
4610407 | Stubbmann | Sep 1986 | A |
4631898 | Brambilla | Dec 1986 | A |
4676048 | Lancaster | Jun 1987 | A |
4712354 | Lancaster | Dec 1987 | A |
4723393 | Silbernagel | Feb 1988 | A |
4761934 | Lancaster | Aug 1988 | A |
4840006 | Humphrey | Jun 1989 | A |
4850177 | Kaczkowski | Jul 1989 | A |
4862678 | Humphrey | Sep 1989 | A |
4866909 | Lancaster, III | Sep 1989 | A |
4898336 | Reist | Feb 1990 | A |
4953336 | Lancaster, III | Sep 1990 | A |
4993209 | Haloila | Feb 1991 | A |
5086610 | Maki-Rahkola | Feb 1992 | A |
5174518 | Hongo | Dec 1992 | A |
5279472 | Hongo | Jan 1994 | A |
5285891 | Keip | Feb 1994 | A |
5311725 | Martin | May 1994 | A |
5404691 | Scherer | Apr 1995 | A |
5423163 | Wendt | Jun 1995 | A |
5505042 | Keip | Apr 1996 | A |
5581979 | Scherer | Dec 1996 | A |
5755083 | Cleine | May 1998 | A |
5967445 | Yuyama | Oct 1999 | A |
6006498 | Cleine | Dec 1999 | A |
6068209 | Nakamura | May 2000 | A |
6195961 | Turfan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230857 | Ciriello | May 2001 | B1 |
6370839 | Nakagawa | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393797 | Romes | May 2002 | B1 |
6595455 | Romes | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6651408 | McClure | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6729106 | Wiley | May 2004 | B2 |
6745544 | Matsumoto | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6826893 | Cere' | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6880316 | Lancaster, III | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7134260 | Haloila | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7516694 | Eifler | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7530526 | Powers | May 2009 | B1 |
7556129 | Nix | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7644563 | De Gersem | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7937915 | Kohn | May 2011 | B2 |
8079201 | Cere | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8490366 | Hintz | Jul 2013 | B1 |
9206007 | Helseth | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9624059 | Wilfong | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10005580 | Lancaster, III | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10005581 | Lancaster, III | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10023334 | Schwartz | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10045669 | Morand | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20020050543 | Romes | May 2002 | A1 |
20020102122 | Hierro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174628 | Lancaster, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020189210 | Wiley | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030145563 | Cere' | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172629 | Viaud | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050016130 | Matsumoto | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060156694 | Aubin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060243848 | Cano | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070095026 | Moser | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157556 | Feraboli | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220840 | Pecchenini | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080135673 | Sato | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080184676 | Downhill | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100031610 | Smith | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110179752 | Lancaster, III | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120024884 | Wilfong | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120102888 | Downhill | May 2012 | A1 |
20120180430 | Lavoie | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120199019 | Kenney | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120260609 | Kivela | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130134181 | Helseth | May 2013 | A1 |
20140208696 | Phillips | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150259087 | Schwartz | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150360800 | Shelander | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20180229867 | Brizek | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180249637 | Kraus | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180334274 | Brizek | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62661231 | Apr 2018 | US |