Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process

Abstract
This invention is directed to systems, devices and methods for treating organic-containing sludges and converting such sludges to high value fertilizers containing both inorganic and organic fertilizer components, which creates an inorganically-augmented bioorganic fertilizer. The invention describes methods to create a thixotropic or paste-like material via the application of mixing energy to the organic sludge followed by an alkaline treatment and a subsequent ammoniation. The invention further describes a method to increase the plant nutrient content in the organic containing product to a level which permits the finished granular fertilizer product to compete in the commercial agricultural fertilizer marketplace. Further, the invention reduces odors associated with said organic-containing sludges.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


This invention is directed to fertilizers and methods for treating biosolids such as organic-containing sludges and alkaline materials thereby converting them into useful inorganic-organic nutrient fertilizers. The invention is also directed to treatment of sludges or biosolids to reduce noxious odorants prior to drying steps in manufacture of organic containing fertilizers.


2. Description of the Background


There are a number of methods currently available for converting organic materials into fertilizers. Examples of such organic materials include, animal residuals and manures, sewage sludge, lagoon sludges, pharmaceutical fermentation sludges, food fermentation sludges and other microbial digested organic materials such as blood meal, fish by-products and meal, food wastes, food processing wastes and animal remains such as slaughterhouse wastes (all hereinafter referred to as “biosolids”).


When these organic-containing materials are manufactured into fertilizers, very often they contain low levels of the important plant nutrients, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. This limits their usefulness and marketability in commercial agriculture which applies value to a fertilizer based upon its nutrient content, especially the nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in dry weight. This is especially true of products manufactured from municipal biosolids as the nitrogen level in biosolids on a dry weight basis is usually 3 to 5 percent. The implications of a low fertilizer nutrient level are low market value with concomitant limitations on the distance these materials can be transported from their manufacturing site. In contrast, high nitrogen fertilizers (products containing over 8 percent nitrogen by dry weight and especially products over 12 percent nitrogen by dry weight) can be transported thousands of miles to wholesale and retail markets.


A few organic products can be purchased “fortified” for a higher nutrient analysis. The ingredients used to fortify organic fertilizers are generally inorganic fertilizer components which because these already are fertilizers are expense, for example, ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate or urea and various sources of potash (potassium) such as potassium oxides and greensand.


Organic fertilizers depend on soil organisms to break them down to release nutrients; therefore, most are effective only when soil is moist and warm enough for the microorganisms to be active. Nutrient release by microbial activity, in general, occurs over a fairly long time period. One potential drawback is that the organic fertilizer may not release enough of their principal nutrient when the plant needs it for growth.


Biosolids or dewatered sewer sludge is a recycled product of municipal sewage treatment plants. Two forms are commonly available: activated and composted. Activated sludge has higher concentrations of nutrients (approximately 5-3-0) than composted sludge. It is usually sold in a dry, granular form for use as a general purpose, long lasting, non-burning fertilizer. Composted sludge is used primarily as a soil amendment or horticulture material and has a lower nutrient content (approximately 1-2-0) because the microbial activity in the composting process has caused the loss of nutrients into the atmosphere.


Compared to synthetic fertilizer formulations, organic fertilizers contain relatively low concentrations of actual nutrients, but they perform important functions which the synthetic formulations do not. They increase the organic content and consequently the water-holding capacity of the soil. They improve the physical structure of the soil which allows more air to get to plant roots. Where organic sources are used for fertilizer, bacterial and fungal activity increases in the soil. Mycorrhizal fungi which make other nutrients more available to plants thrive in soil where the organic matter content is high. Organically derived plant nutrients are slow to leach from the soil making them less likely to contribute to water pollution than synthetic fertilizers.


There is concern with long term effects of using biosolids products in agriculture, particularly around edible crops, in the prior art. Possible negative effects varied with the origin of the biosolids and with the characteristics of the biosolids, for example, the level of disinfection that was applied to the biosolids prior to its usage and to the level of metals that were contained in the biosolids. Many commercial biosolids processing technologies produce what is classed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a Class B biosolids. This type of biosolids still has potential pathogens present because of the milder stringency permitted in the processing of these biosolids as compared to the high stringency Class A biosolids. The majority of biosolids processed in the United States in 2006 are still processed using Class B type protocols. A third concern regarding biosolids safety is their potential containment of personal pharmaceuticals or bio-active compounds such as antibiotics. Very few commercial biosolids processing methodologies have the mechanisms to eliminate these types of materials. Thus there is a need for safer organic fertilizers made from organic sludge.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and designs for the production of fertilizers containing organic components. The invention provides new tools and methods for converting organic containing materials into safe and valuable nutrient fertilizers that are marketable in commercial agriculture.


This invention is directed to systems, devices and methods for treating organic-containing sludges such as, for example, municipal biosolids, manures, animal residuals, pharmaceutical wastes, lagoon sludges, fermentation wastes and combinations thereof. These methods destroy the pathogens contained in such sludges, especially municipal biosolids and manures and in the final product creates a Class A product as defined by the U.S. EPA. The present invention also increases the plant nutrient content, especially nitrogen, phosphorus and/or potassium and iron in such organic-containing sludges. The present invention describes a method which incorporates a significant alkaline treatment and ammonia exposure to create a strong antimicrobial stress on the microorganisms present immediately prior to an acidification of the material which captures or fixes the ammonia present into ammonium salts which are components of plant nutrient fertilizers. The present invention converts dewatered municipal wastewater biosolids or other organic-containing sludges to a fertilizer comprising sufficient organic and inorganic plant nutrients to be valuable and saleable into the commercial agricultural industry and also, secondarily, reduces the odors associated with such organic sludges.


The present invention is also directed to processes for converting municipal biosolids, manures or animal residuals, or other biological and organic-containing sludges into fertilizers. The invention initially creates a thixotropic or plastic homogenous paste of the biosolids with no water addition. This is followed by a significant alkaline pH increase or pulse to above pH 10.0 coupled with an ammonification of the mix to: a) create a strong antimicrobial stress; b) further improve odors, and; c) simultaneously introduce nitrogen into the mix. This ammonification is followed by an acidification using concentrated phosphoric acid and/or sulfuric acid to: a) fix the ammonia into ammonium phosphate and or ammonium sulfate; b) create an acid stress on the alkaline and ammonia exposed microbes, and; c) to introduce phosphate and sulfur into the mix to create nutrient value in the finished product. If the organic-containing sludge is noxiously odorous then an oxidation step can be inserted in which a strong oxidant, preferably, potassium or calcium ferrate, is reacted with the mix to interact with a significant portion of the reduced sulfur compounds, amines and other organic molecules including odorants such that they are partially oxidized and rendered less odorous.


In addition, the present invention is directed to process herein described further including the addition of chemicals to the fertilizer mix such as one or more oxidants such as, for example, hypochlorites such as sodium hypochlorite or calcium hypochlorite, iron oxides, other metal oxides, calcium ferrate, potassium ferrate or sodium ferrate, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, other peroxides, ozone and chlorine dioxide to further reduce odors As further elaborated in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/359,751 and 11/371,238 (both of which are hereby incorporated by reference) other nutrients can be added with granulation agents to facilitate the creation of extrusions or granules that are hard, dry, between pH 5.6 and pH 7.5 and valuable on the commodity agricultural fertilizer market. This process would compete extremely well against alkaline stabilized biosolids containing processes and their resultant products in that less calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide would need to be used, if at all, and the significant alkaline and disinfecting agent, ammonia, contributes significant nitrogen value to the finished product. The process and resulting products would be considered USEPA Class A biosolids containing products and would commercially compete well against the heat-dried biosolids pellets as manufactured at many municipal wastewater treatment plants (“WWTPs”) presently throughout the U.S. and the world as well as of course the traditional alkaline-stabilized biosolids products.


Other embodiments and advantages of the invention are set forth in part in the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from this description, or may be learned from the practice of the invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 Diagram of pH during process steps of “Alkaline Ammonia Pulse” Process.



FIG. 2 Schematic Diagram of “Alkaline Ammonia Pulse” Process.





DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention is directed to systems, devices and methods for treating organic containing-sludges and producing an inorganically-enhanced bioorganic fertilizer.


The “inorganically-enhanced bioorganic fertilizer” is produced in a method of processing organic containing sludges to a microbially safe condition simultaneously with combining such sludges with plant nutrients containing nitrogen, phosphate, potassium along with sulfur and iron.


It has been surprisingly discovered that by chemically modifying organic containing sludges to fit the needs of nitrogen, phosphorus and/or potassium fertilizer requirements by reacting them with hot, molten or oxidative compounds of nitrogen, phosphate and other plant nutrients like potassium, sulfur, iron, and/or calcium creates a unique and valuable product. The results are a product with at least: a) enhanced commercial valuation, b) reduced odor; and, c) increased nitrogen, phosphorus, iron or other plant nutrients, e.g., potassium and/or sulfur. Significantly, the treated finished product, because it contains a high level of nutrient and is made to contain the physical characteristics of commercial fertilizers, can be sold as is into the commercial marketplace, in other words, without further modification or supplementation as is required with other materials. The advantages associated with the present invention over the state of the art include one or more of the following: combination of high concentration of inorganic plant nutrients with an unusually high concentration of organics in the same fertilizer granule, binding of the organics with the inorganic ammonium ions, production of a safer biosolids or organic sludge containing product, reduction of odors of the dried fertilizer product, increased nitrogen content in the product, increased phosphorus content in the product, increased iron content in the product, increased sulfur content in the product and/or increased potassium content in the product and/or increasing the calcium content or other mineral content in the product.


The conventional method for treating municipal wastewater sludge is to make products that are safe from a public health standpoint, preferably achieving the U.S. EPA's Class A standard for biosolids containing products. The problem is that these products generally have such low commercial value that they have difficulty moving consistently into the commercial marketplace especially at distances over 200 miles from the site of manufacture. As a consequence of this, these biosolids products are either sold for a few dollars per ton or given away or even commonly buried to simply dispose of them. The present invention integrates plant nutrients into the finished product which increases the value of the finished fertilizer and may, as a secondary effect, reduce said odors associated with the finished product.


By using aqueous ammonia instead of anhydrous ammonia as a disinfectant and simultaneously as a source of nitrogen, the manufacturing process avoids the restrictions and prohibitions that exist in many communities from transporting or working with the potentially hazardous anhydrous ammonia material.


Preferably, the process of the invention may be established close to or at existing or new wastewater treatment plants if processing municipal biosolids. If processing a manure or animal waste or biological sludge as in from a fermentation process, it is preferable that the processing plant be constructed as near to the source as possible. Logistics and liability can be minimized by the close association of the inorganically augmented bioorganic fertilizer plant with the biosolids or organic containing sludge source.


The present invention teaches improving the odorant quality of the biosolids that are fed to a granulation and heat drying step and improving the odorant quality of the finished fertilizer by introducing chemical additives to react with odorants within the biosolids, and by placing a coating on the granules or pellets produced thereby reducing the rate at which remaining odorants emit from the finished pellet product. Such a coating also reduces the dusting of said pellets during storage, transport and application thereby further improving their value and usefulness.


The present invention introduces significant chemical stresses to microorganisms that are contained in the dewatered biosolids during the manufacturing process. For example, the treatment of the slightly alkaline biosolids, normally found between pH 7.0 and pH 9.0 to a treatment pH of greater than pH 10 and preferably greater than pH 11 causes the ammonium ions present in the mix to convert to gaseous ammonia. This free ammonia begins the disinfection process for the mix. Further, the present invention teaches that either aqueous ammonia, or anhydrous ammonia, can be directly added to the mix to further increase the concentration of free ammonia and continue the disinfection process. The concentration of free ammonia should meet or exceed 2,000 ppm, or 5,000 ppm, and preferably 10,000 ppm and more preferably 15000 ppm. Such concentrations of ammonia are strongly antimicrobial and directly sensitize very refractile microorganisms such as microbial spores, cysts, and parasite eggs to additional stresses such as acid pH exposure and or heat exposure. High concentrations of ammonia will affect the membranes of microorganisms. The present invention does not need the ammonia to kill the microbial pathogens present, but only needs to sensitize them making exposure to subsequent acidification, and or heat, more effective in destroying these organisms. The concentration of ammonia added to the mix can be raise the concentration of nitrogen in the mix by 6%, preferably by 10% and more preferably by 14%. A portion of this ammonia can be added after the acidification step to avoid creating too much gaseous nitrogen. Adding a portion of the ammonia after acidification will facilitate the production of ammonia salts such as ammonium sulfate or ammonium phosphate. Some additional acid may need to be added after this second ammonia addition in order to react with any free ammonia and to adjust the pH to between pH 5.0 and 7.0.


The present invention improves and broaden the art of municipal sludge treatment and fertilizer manufacture by making a safe valuable inorganically augmented organic combined fertilizer.


The graph in FIG. 1 and the diagram in FIG. 2 illustrate the steps and associated pH changes that occur during the treatment of a biological sludge or biosolids with the present invention. Step 1 represents the starting pH of the untreated dewatered biological sludge or biosolids. Further, the starting ammonia concentration in the untreated sludge was about 15 ppm. Step 2 is the conditioning step in which the biosolids or sludge is rendered thixotropic or into a paste-like consistency. The pH and the ammonia concentration did not change. In step 3, an alkaline material selected from calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, alkaline by products such as cement kiln dust, lime kiln dust, Class C fly ash, Class F fly ash, lime injected fly ash or other high alkaline materials, is added and mixed directly to the biological sludge. This causes the pH to rise, as in this example to pH 11.0. This pH rise causes ammonium ion present in the biological sludge to convert to gaseous ammonia and begin the disinfection process.


As a consequence, the free ammonia concentration rose to 2000 ppm. In step 4 additional 9% waste aqueous ammonia is added. This ammonia may also be anhydrous or may be other aqueous percents such as the commonly used 29% aqueous ammonia used in commercial fertilizer protocols. As a consequence, the free ammonia rose to over 10,000 ppm. At the concentrations in step 4 and step 5, ammonia is diffusing into the microorganisms present, causing damage to the cells and cell membranes, and decreasing their subsequent resistance to additional stresses such as acidification and or the application of heat during additional mixing steps or during granulation and drying. The ammonia exposure in the mix should be for a period of about 30 seconds, preferably for about 2 minutes and more preferably for over 5 minutes. During the period of ammonia exposure that the mix be agitated to maximize exposure of microorganisms contained in the sludge to the ammonia. In step 5, an acidification takes place, in this example using waste black phosphoric acid at 65% P2O5. This step reduces the pH to the physiological friendly pH ranging from pH 5.7 to pH 7.0, preferably to pH 6.5. The reaction of this acid with the ammonia present in the mix creates ammonium phosphate and will release exothermic heat into the mix. This heat, greater than 176 degrees Fahrenheit (80° C.), preferably greater than 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100° C.) and more preferably greater than 250 degrees Fahrenheit (121° C.), following the ammonification earlier, will continue the disinfection process. This acidification step will reduce the ammonia concentration significantly in this example, to 10 ppm. Further, the ammonium phosphate now formed in the reacted mix will contribute plant nutrient value to the final product. In the final Step in this example, other nutrients are added, selected from the group comprised of ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, mono-ammonium phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate, potash, urea, ferric oxide, and ferric sulfate and the mix is processed using conventional granulation and drying technologies into the finished hard, dry granular fertilizer product. Further, liquid fertilizers, such as urea ammonium nitrate (“UAN”), and or aqueous urea, can be blended into the mix following acidification. The concentration of free ammonia will continue to drop—in this example, to approximately 3 ppm.



FIG. 2 of the Alkaline Ammonification Pulse (“AAP”) process shows the steps used to create a valuable fertilizer product starting with an organic sludge. The pH and the ammonia concentration are represented as steps. Step 1 represents the biosolids as they enter the process. Step 2 is immediately after the biosolids are rendered thixotropic. Step 3 is upon addition of the alkaline material to the process initially increasing the ammonia concentration. Step 4 adds additional ammonia required to raise the ammonia concentration in the mix to over 10,000 ppm. Step 5 is following acidification of the mix. Step 6 is the resultant pH and ammonia concentration at completion of the process of the invention.


Overall, the dewatered municipal biosolids are at a concentration of approximately 25 percent solids. In the AAP process, the preferred practice is to place the processing plant at or near the biosolids generating plant, preferably the wastewater treatment plant (“WWTP”). One purpose of the close proximity of the AAP processing plant with the WWTP is to reduce logistics and liability associated with moving the sludge or biosolids from the WWTP to the AAP plant as well as to retain the processing capability of returning extracted water from the biosolids back to the WWTP thereby preventing the necessity of discharging this water into the aqueous or atmospheric environment. By not having to transport the amount of water contained in dewatered biosolids to a distant biosolids processing plant a large economic savings can be an advantage.


The initial step in the AAP process as shown in FIG. 1 is to convert the dewatered biosolids cake into a thixotropic material, preferably a paste-like consistency without the addition of water or other materials to the biosolids or sludge. This is accomplished efficiently using the preferred method of introducing the biosolids into a plow blender dual-shafted pugmill or other vigorous mixer, which will agitate and mix the biosolids into the thixotropic consistency. Following this step, the biosolids can be deodorized if necessary, by the introduction into the pugmill or mixer or an additional pugmill or mixer of an oxidant, in this example, a chlorine dioxide, which oxidatively modifies the reduced sulfur, amine and organic odors to an acceptable level. Alternatively, the addition of calcium ferrate or potassium ferrate can be added as the oxidative step. The addition of ferrate has the advantage here since ferrate is a powerful oxidant that has the ability not only to oxidize reduced sulfur compounds and other odorants, it can denature protein and other organic molecules present in the sludge thereby reducing or eliminating their odor or biological activity. Further, the addition of ferrate, following the oxidation, causes valuable iron to be part of the nutrient chemistry of the final product. The next step in the procedure, for which this method obtains its title, is the addition of an alkaline agent, in this example, the addition of an amount of lime kiln dust containing calcium oxide, which raises the pH of the mix to greater than pH 10.0 and in this example to pH 11.0. This increase in pH will cause the liberation of a significant proportion of the ammonium ion present into free ammonia. This free ammonia will commence the disinfection process for the biosolids. To insure that disinfection is significant and that sufficient nitrogen is added to the mix to form a valuable fertilizer, the next step is an ammonification of the mix by the introduction of an ammonia containing material, in this example, using 9% aqueous ammonia, to raise the ammonia concentration in the mix to greater than 10,000 ppm and in this example to 15,000 ppm. This concentration of ammonia will cause membrane damage to the microorganisms present and continue the disinfection process. Many microorganisms will die as a result of this treatment; however, it is not necessary for all of the pathogens present to be killed by this step. What does happen is that this ammonification is a significant stress to the pathogens present and renders them more sensitive to subsequent antimicrobial stresses of acidification and ultimately in the process of this invention to heat exposure, greater than 176 degrees Fahrenheit (80 degrees Celsius), preferably above 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius) and more preferably above 250 degrees Fahrenheit (121 degrees Celsius), such that the resultant product is safe from a public health perspective. The product of this invention meets the U.S. EPA's Class A standard for products containing a percentage of municipal biosolids.


The ammonification step occurring in a pugmill or mixer is then followed in a subsequent pugmill, by the acidification of the mix. Preferably, and in this example, phosphoric acid is added, in this case 65% waste black phosphoric acid, such that the pH in the mix is reduced to below pH 7.0 and in this example to pH 6.5. Various plant nutrients are then added, such as diammonium phosphate (“DAP”), ammonium sulfate, urea, potash (“KCl”), and or ferric oxide to create a plant nutrient concentration that is suitable for marketing the product as a commercial fertilizer. In this example, the nutrients added caused the mix, in the final product, to equal, on a weight percent basis a 10-10-10-0-1-20 (N—P—K—S—Fe-Organic) fertilizer. Further, granulating agents, such as industrial molasses or proprietary binding agents, are added here to facilitate the granulating process to convert the mix into spherical granules. The mix is then moved to a granulator dryer to create a product with a preferred diameter of between 2.0 mm and 3.5 mm, preferably and in this example to 2.7 mm. The proper diameter is insured by moving the granules through a screen system with the reject sizes being milled and recycled to the granulation system. The proper sized granules are cooled, and optionally coated with a material to prevent the dusting of the granules during storage and shipment. Further, the optional coating material is selected, in the present invention, to retard the emission of any odorants remaining in the granules. Finally the granules are moved to dry storage until shipment. Preferably, the granules have a dryness of 90% or more solids.


The present invention accomplishes at least the following:


A. The creation of a high value fertilizer granule employing an alkaline and ammonia stabilization strategy.


B. That sludges or biosolids to be treated may be comprised of municipal biosolids or sludges, manures or animal residuals, or from organic sludges as produced from food fermentation wastes or pharmaceutical fermentation wastes.


C. The production of a commercially viable amount of plant nutrient content in finished fertilizer granules.


D. Methods to reduce the odors associated with organic containing sludges during the production of inorganic augmented-bioorganic fertilizer granules.


E. The first step in treating organic containing sludges is to convert them to a thixotropic or paste-like mix.


F. Following conversion to a thixotropic paste the addition of an alkaline agent to the mix will cause the ammonium ion present to convert to free ammonia.


G. An additional pulse of ammonia can be added to bring the free ammonia concentration to over 1000 PPM and preferably over 10,000 PPM and more preferably over 20,000 PPM.


H. Nutrient enhancement may come from directly adding dry or liquid fertilizers to the mix before it is granulated and dried.


I. The reduction of odors and addition of plant nutrients to said fertilizer granules.


J. Reduction of odors and addition of plant nutrients to occur simultaneously in the production of said fertilizer granules.


K. The introduction of a multiple sequential antimicrobial stresses during the manufacture of fertilizer granules.


L. Concentrated acid is added to ammoniated dewatered biosolids a significant exothermic heat reaction will occur which will introduce a physical heat disinfecting process to the biosolids prior to the granulating and drying steps in the manufacture of fertilizer granules.


M. The production or manufacture of a valuable fertilizer capable of being sold into the commercial agricultural marketplace.


N. Treats biosolids or organic containing sludges to increase the level of plant nutrients that will be contained and plant available in the finished dried pellet or granule. The chemical additions are made to dewatered biosolids. The chemical additions are added to the dewatered biosolids by means of a mixer, such as a pugmill, preferably a dual-shafted plow-bladed pugmill, that blends the additives with the biosolids mix such that the additives have the opportunity to completely interact and react with the chemical components of the biosolids.


In one embodiment of the invention, an alkaline material is added to the organic sludge after the sludge is converted into a thixotropic paste-like material and after the sludge has been oxidized with an oxidizing agent such as calcium ferrate. This alkaline step is followed by an addition of more ammonia via either aqueous ammonia or anhydrous ammonia. Concentrated acid or mixture of concentrated acids, such as phosphoric acid and/or sulfuric acid is/are introduced to the ammoniated mix. Further, the acid pH created by such acid addition is within the range of pH 4.0 to 7.5, preferably from pH 5.0 to 7.0 and preferably to a narrower range of pH 5.8 to pH 6.8. Such a desirable pH range is preferred by fertilizer distributors and/or the grower/farmer final customer of the product of this invention. The effect of this interaction and reaction is to lessen the odor associated with the finished heat dried product and to increase the plant nutrient chemical content and value of the finished heat dried product. Concentrated phosphoric acid, as 70% super phosphoric acid and/or 50-65% phosphoric acid (black or green, agricultural grade phosphoric acid) is added directly to the ammoniated sludge mixture. The addition of phosphoric acid not only reduces the odor associated with such biosolids, but simultaneously increases the phosphorus (P) content of the finished product. The generation of ammonia by addition of alkaline admixture to the biosolids as well as by direct additions of ammonia, either as aqueous ammonia or anhydrous ammonia or ammonium ions, will have a disinfecting role in destroying pathogens that are contained in the dewatered biosolids prior to the drying step of fertilizer granule manufacturing process.


Further, the present invention involves oxidants such as such as calcium ferrate or potassium ferrate or sodium ferrate, hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, ozone, sodium hypochlorite and calcium hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide in reducing odor of organic containing sludges prior to their being treated with the alkaline agent and the ammoniating agent. Further, the invention teaches the use of iron oxide and other forms of iron, such as iron sulfate which can be mixed in directly with the alkaline mix


Further, the process employs one or more nutrient fertilizer materials, such as ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, mono-ammonium phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate, and urea and further, may be selected from the group of liquid fertilizers, such as urea ammonium nitrate (“UAN”), liquid urea or from other liquid N—P—K fertilizers such as, for example, 16-4-8, 10-8-8, or 6-14-6.


Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. All references cited herein, including all publications, U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, are specifically and entirely incorporated by reference. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only.

Claims
  • 1. An inorganically-enhanced, bioorganic fertilizer with reduced bioorganic odor, comprising: dried granules of one or more organic materials containing disinfected biosolids and a nutrient mixture;wherein the dried granules have a dryness of greater than 90%, and are coated with a material to reduce dust formation;wherein the fertilizer contains no active pathogens and organisms, and odors have been substantially reduced or eliminated during processing with the nutrient mixture;wherein the nutrient mixture is comprised of nitrogen and one or more of calcium, phosphorous, potassium, sulfur, or iron; andwherein the nutrient mixture is reacted with chemical components of the organic materials such that the fertilizer does not require further modification or supplementation before use.
  • 2. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the one or more organic materials are from municipal sewage.
  • 3. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the dried granules have an average diameter of 2.7 mm.
  • 4. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the concentration of one or more of calcium, nitrogen, phosphorous, iron, or potassium in the fertilizer is greater than the respective concentration of calcium, nitrogen, phosphorous, iron, or potassium in an all organic fertilizer.
  • 5. The fertilizer of claim 1, which comprises, by weight, from 6% to 16% nitrogen, 20% or more organic components and from 4% to 14% phosphorous, from 6% to 10% potassium, or up to 1% iron.
  • 6. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the water-holding capacity of the fertilizer is greater than the water-holding capacity of a synthetic fertilizer.
  • 7. The fertilizer of claim 1, further comprising an oxidant.
  • 8. The fertilizer of claim 7, wherein the oxidant is selected from the group consisting of calcium ferrate, potassium ferrate, sodium ferrate, hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The fertilizer of claim 1, which has a pH of from 4 to 7.5, from 5 to 7, or from 5.8 to 6.8.
  • 10. The fertilizer of claim 1, which comprises a granulating or binding agent.
  • 11. The fertilizer of claim 10, wherein the granulating or binding agent is industrial molasses.
  • 12. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the pathogens and organisms are selected from the group consisting of microorganisms, bacteria, spores, pharmaceutical compounds, and waste material.
  • 13. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the one or more organic materials are subjected to heat or a concentration of ammonia.
  • 14. The fertilizer of claim 13, wherein the heat is a temperature of greater than 80° C., greater that 100° C., or greater than 121° C.
  • 15. The fertilizer of claim 13, wherein the concentration of ammonia is from 2,000 ppm to 20,000 ppm.
  • 16. The fertilizer of claim 1, which meets USEPA biosolid Class A standards.
  • 17. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the dried granules have a diameter of 2 mm to 3.5 mm.
  • 18. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the nitrogen content of the fertilizer is from 6-16%.
  • 19. The fertilizer of claim 1, wherein the nitrogen content of the fertilizer is over 8%.
  • 20. An inorganically-enhanced, bioorganic fertilizer with reduced bioorganic odor, comprising: dried granules of one or more organic materials containing disinfected biosolids, a binding or granulating agent, and a nutrient mixture;wherein the dried granules have a dryness of greater than 90%, and are coated with a material to reduce dust formation;wherein the fertilizer contains no active pathogens and organisms, and odors have been substantially reduced or eliminated during processing with the nutrient mixture;wherein the nutrient mixture is comprised of nitrogen and one or more of calcium, phosphorous, potassium, sulfur, or iron; andwherein the nutrient mixture is reacted with chemical components of the organic materials such that the fertilizer does not require further modification or supplementation before use as a USEPA Class A biosolid.
  • 21. The fertilizer of claim 20, wherein the binding or granulating agent is industrial molasses.
  • 22. The fertilizer of claim 21, wherein the one or more organic materials are subjected to heat at a temperature of greater than 80° C., greater that 100° C., or greater than 121° C., and a concentration of ammonia of from 2,000 ppm to 20,000 ppm.
  • 23. The fertilizer of claim 20, wherein the dried granules have a diameter of 2 mm to 3.5 mm.
  • 24. The fertilizer of claim 20, wherein the nitrogen content of the fertilizer is from 6-16%.
  • 25. The fertilizer of claim 20, wherein the nitrogen content of the fertilizer is over 8%.
  • 26. An inorganically-enhanced, bioorganic fertilizer with reduced bioorganic odor, comprising: one or more organic materials containing disinfected biosolids, a binding or granulating agent, and a nutrient mixture;wherein the fertilizer contains no active pathogens and organisms, and odors have been substantially reduced or eliminated during processing with the nutrient mixture;wherein the nutrient mixture is comprised of nitrogen and one or more of calcium, phosphorous, potassium, sulfur, or iron;wherein the nutrient mixture is reacted with chemical components of the organic materials such that the fertilizer does not require further modification or supplementation before use as a USEPA Class A biosolid; andwherein the fertilizer comprises, by weight, from 6% to 16% nitrogen, 20% or more organic components and from 4% to 14% phosphorous, from 6% to 10% potassium or up to 1% iron.
  • 27. The fertilizer of claim 26, wherein the dried granules have a diameter of 2 mm to 3.5 mm.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/084,663 filed Nov. 20, 2013, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,864,868 on Oct. 21, 2014; a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/472,843 filed May 16, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,597,394 on Dec. 3, 2013, a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/103,637 filed May 9, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,202,342 on Jun. 19, 2012, a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/705,813 filed Feb. 15, 2010, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,947,105 on May 24, 2011, and a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/521,604 filed Sep. 15, 2006, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,662,206 on Feb. 16, 2010, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/716,964, filed Sep. 15, 2005, the entirety of each of which is specifically incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (171)
Number Name Date Kind
2026969 Flynn Jan 1936 A
2568901 Stengel Sep 1951 A
2755176 Pearce et al. Jul 1956 A
2800457 Green et al. Jul 1957 A
2800458 Green Jul 1957 A
2902342 Rehfeld Sep 1959 A
3050383 Paden et al. Aug 1962 A
3259482 Hansen Jul 1966 A
3264088 Hansen Aug 1966 A
3264089 Hansen Aug 1966 A
3304588 McIlvaine Feb 1967 A
3345288 Sontheimer Oct 1967 A
3475154 Kato Oct 1969 A
3476683 Liljeren Nov 1969 A
3655395 Karnemaat Apr 1972 A
3756784 Pittwood Sep 1973 A
3796669 Kiritani et al. Mar 1974 A
3837872 Conner Sep 1974 A
3915853 Luck Oct 1975 A
3939280 Karnemaat Feb 1976 A
3942970 O'Donnell Mar 1976 A
3960718 Lebo Jun 1976 A
3966450 O'Neill et al. Jun 1976 A
4001140 Foris et al. Jan 1977 A
4076515 Rickard Feb 1978 A
4079003 Manchak Mar 1978 A
4100103 Foris et al. Jul 1978 A
4108771 Weiss Aug 1978 A
4124405 Quienot Nov 1978 A
4134750 Norton et al. Jan 1979 A
4154593 Brown et al. May 1979 A
4180459 Zievers Dec 1979 A
4219347 Young Aug 1980 A
4230568 Chappell Oct 1980 A
4249929 Kneer Feb 1981 A
4270279 Roediger Jun 1981 A
4304588 Moore, Jr. Dec 1981 A
4306978 Wurtz Dec 1981 A
4377406 Achorn et al. Mar 1983 A
4377486 Barrick et al. Mar 1983 A
4405354 Thomas, II et al. Sep 1983 A
4454259 Reischl et al. Jun 1984 A
4500428 Lynch et al. Feb 1985 A
4514307 Chestnut et al. Apr 1985 A
4519831 Moore May 1985 A
4541986 Schwab et al. Sep 1985 A
4554002 Nicholson Nov 1985 A
4601863 Shioi et al. Jul 1986 A
4619684 Salladay et al. Oct 1986 A
4655932 Roslonski Apr 1987 A
4659472 Nordlund et al. Apr 1987 A
4711659 Moore Dec 1987 A
4743287 Robinson May 1988 A
4772490 Kogler et al. Sep 1988 A
4781842 Nicholson Nov 1988 A
4792349 Trimm et al. Dec 1988 A
4793927 Meehan et al. Dec 1988 A
4902431 Nicholson et al. Feb 1990 A
4966706 Gregor Oct 1990 A
4997572 Wurtz Mar 1991 A
5013458 Christy, Sr. et al. May 1991 A
5051031 Schumacher et al. Sep 1991 A
5087375 Weinwurm Feb 1992 A
5118337 Bleeker Jun 1992 A
5125951 Lahoda et al. Jun 1992 A
5135664 Burnham Aug 1992 A
5147563 Long, Jr. et al. Sep 1992 A
5183577 Lehmann Feb 1993 A
5238480 Rehberg et al. Aug 1993 A
5252116 Markham et al. Oct 1993 A
5259977 Girovich et al. Nov 1993 A
5275733 Burnham Jan 1994 A
5340376 Cunningham Aug 1994 A
5342442 Nechvatal et al. Aug 1994 A
5346527 Rehbein et al. Sep 1994 A
5356540 Khan et al. Oct 1994 A
5385673 Fergen Jan 1995 A
5393317 Robinson Feb 1995 A
5401402 Christy et al. Mar 1995 A
5409605 Haley et al. Apr 1995 A
5417861 Burnham May 1995 A
5419839 Haley et al. May 1995 A
5422015 Angell et al. Jun 1995 A
5435923 Girovich Jul 1995 A
5443613 Robinson Aug 1995 A
5466273 Connell Nov 1995 A
5500044 Meade et al. Mar 1996 A
5554279 Christy Sep 1996 A
5556445 Quinn et al. Sep 1996 A
5580458 Yamasaki et al. Dec 1996 A
5593590 Steyskal Jan 1997 A
5593591 Ohsol et al. Jan 1997 A
5603842 Whitaker et al. Feb 1997 A
5618442 Christy Apr 1997 A
5635069 Boss et al. Jun 1997 A
5669969 Meade et al. Sep 1997 A
5679129 Hon Oct 1997 A
5681481 Christy et al. Oct 1997 A
5733355 Hibino et al. Mar 1998 A
5766302 Lefroy et al. Jun 1998 A
5783073 Christy et al. Jul 1998 A
5807724 Resnick Sep 1998 A
5849060 Diping et al. Dec 1998 A
5853450 Burnham et al. Dec 1998 A
5853590 Burnham Dec 1998 A
5862610 Lipert Jan 1999 A
5876613 Bonnin et al. Mar 1999 A
5906750 Haase May 1999 A
5916448 Fergen Jun 1999 A
5984992 Greer et al. Nov 1999 A
5993505 Tijsma et al. Nov 1999 A
6051411 Turtakovsky et al. Apr 2000 A
6103191 Luker Aug 2000 A
6117406 Vogel et al. Sep 2000 A
6159263 Greer et al. Dec 2000 A
6165550 Markusch et al. Dec 2000 A
6176891 Komoriya et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187074 von Locquenghien et al. Feb 2001 B1
6237246 Millard May 2001 B1
6237264 Gulick, Jr. May 2001 B1
6256902 Flaherty et al. Jul 2001 B1
6284278 Waldman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6325035 Codina et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331300 Dybas et al. Dec 2001 B1
6398840 Orta-Castro et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406510 Burnham Jun 2002 B1
6409788 Sower Jun 2002 B1
6409789 Gilbert Jun 2002 B1
6461399 Connell Oct 2002 B1
6465706 Rogers et al. Oct 2002 B1
6517599 Gilbert Feb 2003 B2
RE38238 Nicholson et al. Aug 2003 E
6623650 Millard Sep 2003 B2
6666154 Logan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6716360 Titmas Apr 2004 B2
6752848 Logan et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752849 Logan et al. Jun 2004 B2
6758879 Greer et al. Jul 2004 B2
6841515 Burnham Jan 2005 B2
6852142 Varshovi Feb 2005 B2
7128880 Dahms et al. Oct 2006 B2
7497956 Blais et al. Mar 2009 B2
7513927 Faulmann et al. Apr 2009 B2
7604742 Shankar et al. Oct 2009 B2
7662205 Burnham Feb 2010 B2
7662206 Burnham Feb 2010 B2
7789931 Burnham et al. Sep 2010 B2
7947104 Burnham et al. May 2011 B2
7947105 Burnham May 2011 B2
8057569 Burnham et al. Nov 2011 B2
8105413 Burnham Jan 2012 B2
20020098982 Burnham Jul 2002 A1
20020157439 Gilbert Oct 2002 A1
20030070460 Logan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030089151 Logan May 2003 A1
20030121302 Oliver et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030136165 Logan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040065127 Connell Apr 2004 A1
20040177664 Hale Sep 2004 A1
20040258305 Burnham et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005660 Burnham et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050019207 Oliver et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050039508 Burnham Feb 2005 A1
20060243009 Burnham Nov 2006 A1
20070257715 Semerdzhiev Nov 2007 A1
20080000279 Faulmann et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080034822 Burnham et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080230484 Burnham et al. Sep 2008 A1
20100139345 Burnham Jun 2010 A1
20100139346 Burnham Jun 2010 A1
20100288003 Burnham et al. Nov 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
2523628 Dec 1976 DE
2800915 Sep 1978 DE
4127459 Feb 1993 DE
0143392 Jun 1985 EP
0557078 Aug 1993 EP
0770586 May 1997 EP
2133115 Nov 1972 FR
2757504 Jun 1998 FR
58032638 Feb 1983 JP
9110570 Apr 1997 JP
2001129597 May 2001 JP
2002248454 Mar 2002 JP
WO9856735 Dec 1998 WO
WO9947282 Sep 1999 WO
WO0136082 May 2001 WO
WO0136887 May 2001 WO
WO0168562 Sep 2001 WO
WO0169150 Sep 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (28)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 10/854,677, filed Feb. 24, 2005, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,127, filed Nov. 3, 2011, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,933, filed Jun. 30, 2011, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,828, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,967, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/654,957, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/659,434, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/700,730, Burnham.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/704,458, Burnham.
PCT Search Report PCT/US06/006220.
PCT Search Report PCT/US06/008536.
PCT Search Report PCT/US06/036085.
PCT Search Report PCT/US08/054315.
PCT Search Report PCT/US10/062504.
PCT Written Opinion PCT/US06/006220.
PCT Written Opinion PCT/US06/008536.
PCT Written Opinion PCT/US06/036085.
PCT Written Opinion PCT/US08/054315.
AU Exam Report for PCT/US06/036085, dated Jan. 20, 2011.
CA Exam Report for PCT/US06/08536, dated Dec. 9, 2011.
CA Exam Report for PCT/US06/08536, dated Mar. 28, 2011.
RU Examination Report for PCTUS08054315.
AU Exam Report for PCTUS08054315, dated Jul. 5, 2010.
JP Exam Report for PCTUS08054315, dated Dec. 21, 2010.
CN Exam Report for PCTUS08054315.
AU Exam Report for PCTUS08054315, dated Nov. 23, 2010.
CA Exam Report for PCTUS08054315, dated May 10, 2011.
CA Exam Report for PCT/US2008/54315, dated Feb. 9, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150020560 A1 Jan 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60716964 Sep 2005 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 14084663 Nov 2013 US
Child 14509223 US
Parent 13472843 May 2012 US
Child 14084663 US
Parent 13103637 May 2011 US
Child 13472843 US
Parent 12705813 Feb 2010 US
Child 13103637 US
Parent 11521604 Sep 2006 US
Child 12705813 US