Organophosphorous, multivalent metal compounds, and polymer adhesive interpenetrating network compositions and methods

Abstract
Certain small molecule amino acid phosphate compounds such as phosphoserine and certain multivalent metal compounds such as calcium phosphate containing cements have been found to have improved properties and form an interpenetrating network in the presence of a polymer that contains either an electronegative carbonyl oxygen atom of the ester group or an electronegative nitrogen atom of the amine group as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available multivalent metal ions.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
Field of the Disclosure

Improved calcium phosphate cements are well tolerated by the body. These improved cements include a non-covalently bonded interpenetrating network.


Description of the Background of the Disclosure

Calcium phosphate composites are used as bone substitutes and bone grafts. These calcium phosphate composites tend to form complexes primarily between calcium-based salts through charge interactions. These composites are used as general bone void fillers and generally lack the adhesive strength sufficient to adhere or fix bones together, for example, fractured surfaces. These prior compositions have insufficient chemical interaction between the calcium phosphate composite and the bone surface or other surface materials and lack sufficient strength to be used to attach bone to bone or bone to other materials.


Certain marine species, such as tubeworms and sand castle worms, rely on secreted proteins containing a high amount of the amino acid phosphoserine for adhesion mechanisms (“The tube cement of Phragmatopoma californica: a solid foam,” Russell J. Stewart, James C. Weaver, Daniel E. Morse and J. Herbert Waite, Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4727-4734, 2004). The specific mechanism of the phosphoserine involvement with the proteins is not understood; however, phosphoserine has been reported to be responsible for a specific interaction with calcium containing hydroxyapatite of bone as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005-0217538A1. In this publication, the authors mention calcium phosphate cements modified with phosphoserine (from 0.5% to 5% weight of the formulation) to aid as a compressive strength and surface area modifier in the bone cement material. In this range (from 0.5% to 5% weight of the formulation) the cement does not exhibit appreciable bone adhesion properties. In addition, certain bio-resorbable fibers have been used as adjuncts to calcium cements. These fibers include those based on polymers formed from mixtures of lactic and glycolic acids as well as other similar polymeric materials.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

One aspect of the present invention relates to a non-covalently bonded interpenetrating network that comprises a reactive mixture of a small amino acid phosphate species, a multivalent metal compound, and a polymeric material that contain functional groups that contains electronegative atoms as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available metal ions, in an aqueous environment.


A further aspect of the present invention relates to a bone restorative composition that comprises (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound, (ii) a polymer that contain esters, carbonyl, carbonate, carboxylic acids, amides, amine groups and mixtures thereof as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available metal ions, (iii) a compound of the formula;




embedded image



where A is O, CH2, or S; R is H, NH2, NHCO(CH2)tCH3 where t is 0 to 2, NH(CH2)xCH3 where x is 0 to 3, NR1R2 where R1 is (CH2)yCH3 and R2 is (CH2)yCH3 where y is 0 to 2, (CH2)zCH3 where z is 0 to 3, where m is 0 to 1, and where n is 0 to 3 and wherein the compound is present in an amount greater than about 10% by weight based on the combined weight of the multivalent metal phosphate salt and the compound, and (iv) an aqueous medium.


A still further aspect of the present invention relates to kit for restoring bone comprising; A) A first container containing a composition that comprises: (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound, (ii) a polymer that contain esters, carbonyl, carbonate, carboxylic acids, amides, amine groups and mixtures thereof as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available metal ions, and (iii) a compound of the formula;




embedded image



where A is O, CH2, or S; R is H, NH2, NHCO(CH2)tCH3 where t is 0 to 2, NH(CH2)xCH3 where x is 0 to 3, NR1R2 where R1 is (CH2)yCH3 and R2 is (CH2)yCH3 where y is 0 to 2, (CH2)zCH3 where z is 0 to 3, where m is 0 to 1, and where n is 0 to 3 and wherein the compound is present in an amount greater than about 10% by weight based on the combined weight of the multivalent metal phosphate compound and the compound, and B) a second container containing an aqueous medium.


Another aspect of the present invention relates to a method of adhering a material to a polymer comprising the steps of: placing a composition between the material and the polymer wherein the composition comprises (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound, (ii) a compound of the formula;




embedded image



where A is O, CH2, or S; R is H, NH2, NHCO(CH2)tCH3 where t is 0 to 2, NH(CH2)xCH3 where x is 0 to 3, NR1R2 where R1 is (CH2)yCH3 and R2 is (CH2)yCH3 where y is 0 to 2, (CH2)zCH3 where z is 0 to 3, where m is 0 to 1, and where n is 0 to 3 and wherein the compound is present in an amount greater than about 10% by weight based on the combined weight of the multivalent metal phosphate salt and the compound, and (iii) an aqueous medium; and allowing the composition to cure to form an interpenetrating network at the interface between the composition and the polymer, wherein the polymer contain esters, carbonyl, carbonate, carboxylic acids, amides, amine groups and mixtures thereof as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available metal ions, and wherein the composition adheres to the material.


Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram showing detail of a proposed structure of the interpenetrating network of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a representation of the test setup for testing the strength of the bond between bone and a polymer sheet; and



FIG. 3 is a representation of the test setup for testing the strength of the bond between two polymer sheets.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Small molecule multivalent metal compounds such as calcium phosphates, including tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) react with small molecule organophosphate compounds such as amino acid phosphate compounds like phosphoserine to form cements in the presence of aqueous environments that have cohesive and adhesive properties. When these cements are in the presence of polymer materials, the multivalent metal compounds and the amino acid phosphate compounds form a complex, interpenetrating network with the surface of polymer materials. The significance of these interpenetrating networks is the ability to form durable materials with high intrinsic strength (e.g. energy to failure) and in some cases extrinsic strength (e.g. adhesion to polymeric surfaces). The polymeric material added to the formulation to form high intrinsic strength can be in any form, such as solution, powder, fiber, resin, liquid crystal, hydrogel, chip, flake, sheet, mesh, and the like. The polymeric material to which the formulation can adhere can be in any form, such as a plate, sheet, mesh, screw, pin, anchor, thread, fiber, suture, foam, film and the like. The complex formation of the interpenetrating network system involves several modes of ionic or ion-dipole interactions stemming from the release of multivalent metal ions such as calcium, magnesium, barium, strontium, and titanium ions and mixtures of these ions from compounds like calcium phosphate, magnesium phosphate, barium phosphates, strontium phosphate, titanium phosphate, zirconium phosphate, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide and mixtures thereof.


Certain small molecule amino acid phosphate compounds, such as phosphoserine, have a phosphate group (PO4), a carboxyl group (COOH), and an amine group (NH2) which are all capable of forming ionic interactions with the available metal ions. For rapid and abundant interactions, TTCP is the ideal metal ion source since it has the highest calcium to phosphate ratio (2:1) of the known calcium phosphate compounds and is well tolerated by the body. Basic TTCP is a calcium rich small molecule that is highly strained and dynamic. As it reacts in an acidic environment, the structure opens to release the calcium ions for ionic bonding. When it releases the calcium, the phosphoryl oxygen of the phosphate group of the TTCP intermediate is available for additional calcium ionic bonding. On this basis the authors hypothesize one method is to manufacture a calcium rich molecule with a calcium to phosphate higher then 2:1 which is even more reactive compared to TTCP. In addition, compositions with less reactivity can also be suitable for use. Such compositions could utilize calcium phosphate compounds with a calcium to phosphate ratio less than 2:1, such as alpha-tricalcium phosphate (1.5:1) or compositions could utilize calcium based compounds which are not from the calcium-phosphate family, such as calcium chloride or calcium oxide. It is preferred that the multivalent metal compound be non-toxic as many uses of these compositions are for medical and/or veterinary uses. However, if the cement is not to be used relative to living organisms, toxicity is of less concern. Suitable multivalent metal compounds include: calcium phosphate, magnesium phosphate, barium phosphates, strontium phosphate, titanium phosphate, zirconium phosphate, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide and mixtures thereof. In addition, non-phosphate compounds of these metals such as carbonates, bicarbonates, sulfates and nitrates can replace some or all of the above phosphate compounds.


To establish a fully integrated interpenetrating network system, ion-dipole multivalent metal ion interactions develop and are extended to the polymer surfaces. For example, with TTCP and phosphoserine, the electronegative carbonyl oxygen atom(s) of the ester group or the electronegative nitrogen atom(s) of the amine group are the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available calcium ions. The reactive and charged TTCP/phosphoserine complex that develops influences the folding of the adjacent polymer chains on the polymer surface in a favorable geometry to enhance the ion-dipole bonding. In addition, both the hydrophobicity and steric structure of the polymer backbone influences the degree of interaction between the polymer to the TTCP/phosphoserine complex. This geometry is depicted in FIG. 1. The structure of FIG. 1 has been confirmed based on solid state NMR (13C, 15N and 31P) and FT-IR analysis. Solid state NMR data suggest that the —NH2, —COOH and —P(O)(OH)2 groups of phosphoserine are involved in a reaction with the calcium ions of TTCP to form a hybrid organic/inorganic macromolecular network through calcium ion bridges. The incorporation of PLGA fibers or polymer surfaces interact with the reactive species which are generated from TTCP and phosphoserine and result in the formation of an interpenetrating network onto the polymer surface. Electronegative carbonyl moiety (ester function) of PLGA involve in reaction with reactive TTCP/phosphoserine to form calcium bridges through ionic interactions. Thus the fibers augment the strength of the TTCP and phosphoserine system by participating in the formation of an interpenetrating polymer network which is quite distinctive from the current fiber reinforced calcium-based bone cements which are currently on the market. In this analysis, the FT-IR analysis also showed that in a mixture of dry TTCP, phosphoserine and polymer, that there were no bands showing an interaction amongst these components in the dry state. However, when an aqueous solution was added, e.g. water, within 30 seconds there were strong shifts in the spectrum showing a reaction among the TTCP, phosphoserine and the polymer consistent with the structure shown in FIG. 1. Based on the NMR and FT-IR data, the TTCP and phosphoserine react rapidly in water to form a macromolecular network with the polymer through calcium bridges and hydrogen bonding. Calcium phosphate cements without sufficient organophosphates such as phosphoserine do not have as much ability to influence this polymer folding effect; thus the ion-dipole interaction is not as strong and gives inferior intrinsic or extrinsic strength. One calcium ion in the interpenetrating network system has the ability to interact with more than one electronegative carbonyl oxygen or electronegative nitrogen group from the polymer surface. An example of this ion-dipole interaction is with the calcium ion and the ester moiety of hydroxybutyrate polymer to from a coordinate complex [Rosetta Natoli Reusch and Harold L. Sadoff, Putative structure and functions of a poly-β-hydroxybutyrate/calcium polyphosphate channel in bacterial plasma membranes, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 85 [June 1988] p. 4176-4180].


It has further been found that certain multivalent metal compound cements that include a certain minimum amount of small amino acid phosphate compounds of the formula;




embedded image



where A is O, CH2, or S; R is H, NH2, NHCO(CH2)tCH3 where t is 0 to 2, NH(CH2)xCH3 where x is 0 to 3, NR1R2 where R1 is (CH2)yCH3 and R2 is (CH2)yCH3 where y is 0 to 2, (CH2)zCH3 where z is 0 to 3, where m is 0 to 1, and where n is 0 to 3 have superior strength in the presence of polymeric compounds that have ionically available electron pairs compared to known calcium phosphate or multivalent metal compound cements. Preferred adjunct compounds are those where A is O or CH2, R is H or NH2, m is 0 or 1 and n is 0 or 1. It is also possible that other similar materials that can assist the multivalent metal ionically bond to reactive sites on the resorbable polymer materials are usable in the calcium phosphate mixture. At present one preferred species is phosphoserine.


The compositions as described herein are useful in a wide variety of medical applications. One use of the compositions is to adhere bone fragments together within the body. This is useful, for example, during surgery to allow for temporary fixation prior to definitive hardware placement, and to enhance fracture fixation by adhering both load and non-load bone fragments together alone and/or in the presence of appropriate immobilization. The compositions also enhance screw and/or bone anchor fixation into low density cancellous bone at and/or after surgery, to allow screw fixation when the core diameter of the screw hole is larger then the screw major diameter, for instance to reattach a metal or bioresorbable screws to bone that has stripped from the surrounding material, to adhere a metal or bioresorbable plate to fractured bones allowing for reduction and/or elimination of metal or bioresorbable screws or pins used to fix a metal or bioresorbable plate to bone. The use of the compositions with a bioresorbable suture may be used to help fixate small bones after fracture. The compositions also have the capacity to enhance fixation of a joint replacement prosthesis to bone (e.g. hip acetabular cup or femoral stem). The compositions adhere the junction of at least one of a tendon, ligament, cartilage, a bone graft, and/or dental implants to bone. The compositions may be used to support new bone growth for dental socket or dental ridge augmentation. The compositions have the capacity to adhere to bony defect perimeters while filling gaps creating a seal to prevent leakage (e.g. cerebral spinal fluid). Furthermore, the compositions may also be used in ossicular chain reconstruction to adhere middle ear ossicles together. The adhesive properties of the compositions of the present invention to bone and bone to other materials make them useful to provide bony contour for facial bone augmentation applications. These compositions are also useful for gluing cancellous bones, cortical bones and a combination of both, whether in fatty or greasy environments potentially without any surface pretreatment prior to application.


One particularly novel use of the compositions is as a bone restorative composition. By a bone restorative composition, it is meant a composition that is useful to restore and/or repair bone, such as bone adhesives, bone cements, bone glues, bone putties, bone void fillers, bone replacement compositions, cements and/or adhesives to fix screws, metal or bioresorbable implants and at least one of a tendon, ligament, cartilage, a bone graft, and/or a dental implant to bone.


As noted above, the compositions have a tacky state shortly after initial mixing. This tacky state enables at least two items, such as two pieces of bone, bone and another material, or two non-bone materials to be held together by the composition itself, without the need for external force, until the composition sets to the final hardened cement state. The amount of force needed to remove two opposed pieces of material from each other is the separation strength. For the composition as described herein, these compositions have a separation strength during the tacky state within the first 4 minutes and preferably within the first 2 minutes after initial mixing from about 10 kPa to about 250 kPa and preferably from about 50 kPa to about 150 kPa. For certain applications it may be useful to have a longer tack state whereby certain compositions have a separation strength which continues in this range for up to 12 minutes. This separation strength is sufficiently high that the items to be joined need not be held together unless there is an apposing strength of the items greater than the separation strength and also, the items can still be repositioned or even reapposed without loss of ultimate bond strength.


It has been found that in the present compositions tetra calcium phosphate (TTCP) has unusual properties not shared by other calcium phosphate compositions or other multivalent metal compounds. TTCP is the most basic of all the calcium phosphates; therefore, it readily reacts to acidic compounds. While other calcium phosphate compositions can be used in addition to the TTCP, it is preferred that the compositions include an effective amount of TTCP. The TTCP used in the present compositions can be made by a variety of methods. One such manufacturing method is disclosed by Chow and Takagi in U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,992, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The TTCP can be 100% pure material or can include other calcium and calcium phosphate materials as an impurity, e.g. α-TCP, CaO and/or HA.


Typical amounts of multivalent metal compounds are from about 10% to about 89.9% by weight based on the total composition of the dry ingredients, namely the metal compound, the small amino acid phosphate species and the polymer. A preferred and optimum amount of the divalent metal compound is from about 40% to about 80% and about 55% to about 65% by weight on the same basis.


A second component of the compositions is a small amino acid phosphate species that has the following formula;




embedded image



where A is O, CH2, or S; R is H, NH2, NHCO(CH2)tCH3 where t is 0 to 2, NH(CH2)xCH3 where x is 0 to 3, NR1R2 where R1 is (CH2)yCH3 and R2 is (CH2)yCH3 where y is 0 to 2, (CH2)zCH3 where z is 0 to 3, where m is 0 to 1, and where n is 0 to 3. Preferred compounds are those where A is O or CH2, R is H or NH2, m is 0 or 1 and n is 0 or 1.


The most preferred small amino acid phosphate species is phosphoserine that has the following structure;




embedded image



The compounds that are structurally similar to phosphoserine, which contain the reactive phosphonate or phosphate, and which have COOH functional groups, are capable of interacting with the Ca++ within the TTCP to form a calcium based matrix and are referred to as compounds structurally similar to phosphoserine in this description. The combination of these functional groups plus the geometry properties of the matrix such as the chain length between the phosphorous and the COOH are unique aspects to the molecules which affect the level of adhesive bonding strength to substrate surfaces such as bone and metal.


The preferred compound that is structurally similar to phosphoserine is any form of phosphoserine, including the phospho-D-serine, phospho-L-serine or the phospho-DL-serine, and/or other similarly constructed compounds. The exact stereochemistry of the phosphoserine does not seem to have any impact on the properties of the compositions disclosed herein.


It has been found that when the quantity of the small amino acid phosphate species are included in the mixture and are increased beyond about 10% w/w based on the total composition of the dry ingredients, namely the metal compound, the small amino acid phosphate species and the polymer, more generally in the range of about 10% to about 89.9%, more typically in the range of about 15% to about 50%, or preferably from about 20% to about 40%, the tack and adhesion properties of the resulting compositions were significant. At such levels, the influence of the small amino acid phosphate species extends beyond internal interaction with the cement, but also extends to significant binding with the hydroxyapatite architecture and proteins of bone. At below about 10% by weight of the small amino acid phosphate species, the compositions do not have a tacky state and these compositions do not have adhesive properties.


Factors that may affect the length of the tacky state, the length of the putty states and the ultimate cure time, as well as strength properties of the compositions include: the percentage (w/w) multivalent metal compound and the small amino acid phosphate species based solely on the weight of the multivalent metal compound and the small amino acid phosphate species in the composition, the selection of the small amino acid phosphate species, the particle size of the multivalent metal compound, and the nature and quantity of any additives and/or fillers which may be combined to the composition to enhance the material properties.


The mean particle size of the multivalent metal compound should be below about 1000 μm, preferably about 1-250 μm, most preferably about 10-100 μm. As the mean particle size of the multivalent metal compound is reduced, the multivalent metal compound tends to dissolve too fast and these compositions may not be practical for all uses as disclosed herein. On the other hand if the multivalent metal compound has a mean particle size of greater than about 1000 μm, the intra-operative performance of the compositions may not have the desired initial strength and be too slow to set. If a longer working time is desired, then multivalent metal compound with a larger mean particle size can be used; however, if a shorter working time is desired, then multivalent metal compound with a smaller mean particle sizes can be used. In certain use environments, compositions that have a multi-modal mean particle size distribution with, for example, one mode less then about 50 μm and the other mode above about 50 μm can provide unique properties such as a fast initial cure rate from the smaller mean particle size mode combined with higher intrinsic compression strength of the material from the larger mean particle size mode.


The aqueous based mixing media useful for combining the multivalent metal compound and the small amino acid phosphate species powders can include water, buffers such as sodium phosphate, saline, and blood based products such as whole blood, plasma, platelet rich plasma, serum, and/or bone marrow aspirate. The blood based products are used with the goal of achieving enhanced rate of bone healing and remodeling. It is also possible to use the compositions without premixing with an aqueous medium if the composition is to be used in a sufficiently wet environment that the aqueous medium can be absorbed from the in situ site. In this situation, the composition can be dusted on and/or other wise applied to the desired site and then mixed with the liquids that are already present at the site. The amount of aqueous medium is not particularly important other than the amount should be chosen to provide the consistency of the desired product for use as a bone restoration composition or other use.


Suitable polymers must contain functional groups that contains electronegative atoms as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available metal ions, such as electronegative carbonyl oxygen atom(s) of the ester group or electronegative nitrogen atom(s) of the amine group as the bonding sites of the polymer surfaces to the available calcium ions. These functional groups can be either in the backbone chain of the polymer or in groups that are pendant to the polymer chain. These polymeric based compounds can include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following; poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), polyglycolide, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(teramethylglycolic-acid), poly(dioxanone), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(tetramethylglycolic-acid-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone-co-L-lactide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate), poly(methyl-methacrylate), poly(acrylate), polyamines, polyamines, polyimidazoles, poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone), collagen, silk, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, gelatin and mixtures thereof. In addition, copolymers of the above homopolymers also can be used. The general structural nature of polymers include linear homo and copolymers, cross linked polymers, block polymers, branched and hyper branched polymers and star shaped polymers. The polymers can be added to the formulation in the form of a solution, powder, fiber, resin, liquid crystal, hydrogel, chip, flake, and the like. The polymeric material can be included directly within the cement formulation or can be an adjunct that is applied in situ as the cement is applied to the bone. The only import aspect is that sufficient polymeric material is available to ionically bond with the calcium phosphate and the adjunct material as described below.


The polymeric material that is included within the composition should be sufficient to show a difference in intrinsic material strength (e.g. the bending moment energy to failure). That amount should be of sufficient weight within the formulation; amounts greater than about 0.1% w/w based on the total weight of the dry components of the composition would be sufficient. The polymeric material included within the composition can be up to about 30% w/w based on the total weight of the dry components of the composition; however, as such levels the adhesive properties decrease; therefore, a balance between intrinsic strength and material adhesive properties is required. For polymeric materials in contact with the composition it is important that the surface area of the polymer is readily available at the molecular level or is in direct contact with the composition.


It has been confirmed as noted above that the polymers form an interpenetrating network having a structure similar to what is shown in FIG. 1. In the illustrated network, the calcium ions from the TTCP form a non-covalently bond, such as an ionic bond, with the phosphoryl oxygen of the TTCP and the phosphoserine and also form ion-dipole bonds with the oxygen atoms in both the backbone of the polymer and pendant to the polymer backbone. The polymer molecules shown in FIG. 1 could represent either the molecules from the surface of a polymer such as from a fiber added intrinsically to the composition or a molecule from the surface of an extrinsic polymer source such as a bioresorbable polymeric based plate.


The interpenetrating networks can be formed at both an acidic and a basic pH. However, only when the pH is raised to a level above pH of about 5 and preferably above a pH of about 6 so the interpenetrating networks form permanent bonds. Also the pH should typically be below a pH of about 9 to be tolerated by the body. If the materials are to be used for other purposes, there is no upper limit other than a pH that will degrade the polymeric material.


Additives may be included in the compositions disclosed herein to further enhance the material properties. These properties include the handling, porosity, intrinsic material strength, & bone healing rate (osteogenic). Depending on the multivalent metal compound chosen, suitable additives might include: alpha or beta tri-calcium phosphate (α-TCP or β-TCP), calcium sulfate, calcium silicate, calcium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride glycerol phosphate disodium, amino acids such as serine, excess amounts of phosphoserine, polyols (such as glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, trehalose, lactose, & sucrose), silk, keratin (primarily found in human hair), autologous bone powder or chips, demineralized bone powder or chips, collagen, BMP7, stem cells, parathyroid hormone (PTH), bisphosphonates, and mixtures thereof. In addition, other additives and/or fillers could be incorporated which offer surgical visual aids & anti-infective properties.


The α-TCP and β-TCP additive component typically is also in granular form. The granules presently contemplated have an overall diameter size in the range of about 0.1 to about 2 mm, or preferably between about 0.5 to about 1 mm. Larger and smaller granules can be used depending on the other components of the composition and the desired end properties. In the present compositions, the particle size of the granules has an impact on the mechanical strengths of the resultant compositions. The total porosity of these granules is in the range of about 40-80%, more preferably about 65-75%, and the average pore diameter size of the granules in these compositions is in the range of about 20-500 μm, preferably about 50-125 μm. The granules do not dissolve within the present embodiments during the curing phase, but interact as a solid particle with the other components of the compositions. In the present compositions, the porosity and pore size listed here has an impact on the resorption characteristics of the resultant compositions and to allow for bony in growth and healing as described by Dalal et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,949,251.


The additives that affect the porosity include cement curing pore forming agents such as calcium carbonate or sodium bicarbonate, granules with pre-formed pores made from alpha or beta tri-calcium phosphate (α-TCP or β-TCP), biodegradable polymers usually in fiber form that open channels or pores as they degrade relatively quick in vivo such as PGA, or copolymers such as PLGA, or biodegradable fibers that open channels or pores as they degrade over relatively long time periods such as PLLA, silk, keratin, collagen, autologous bone powder or chips, or demineralized bone powder or chips. The rate at which the biodegradable polymers degrade can be dependant on the physical state of the crystalline structure when processing the polymer. Amorphous polymers may resorb faster than crystalline polymers. Other biodegradable polymers not in the form of fibers, rather powders, can be used such as PLLA, PGA, PLGA, PEG, or block polymers such as PLLA-PEG-PLLA. Small molecules may also be used which leach away relatively quickly from the cement as it cures; for example, these materials may include sodium chloride, potassium chloride, glycerol phosphate disodium, polyols (such as glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, trehalose, lactose, & sucrose), amino acids such as serine, and/or excess amounts of phosphoserine. Other materials that form pores may dissolve or resorb over time in vivo and release from the cement opening pores; these materials include calcium sulfate, α-TCP or β-TCP powder or granules. Granules can be used to alter the in vivo resorption profile, such as α-TCP or β-TCP granules, or hybrid granules made from calcium sulfate and α-TCP or β-TCP in which the calcium sulfate portion resorbs more quickly.


The additives that affect the bone healing rate driven by new bone ingrowth can be influenced by the level of porosity of the cured cement. This rate can be manipulated by the number of pores and size of the pores created within the cured cement. Achieving such porosity up to about 60% v/v was demonstrated by controlling the ratio of composition ingredients. The porosity that develops during the curing process can be controlled by the amount of pore forming agent added (such as calcium carbonate), the level of compound structurally similar to phosphoserine added, the level of aqueous solution used, and/or the level of other agents added to the composition. Increasing the porosity reduces the material intrinsic strength; however, a balance of porosity vs. strength is critical for achieving the clinical application. Additives that increase the intrinsic material strength can be incorporated to offset the loss of strength by creating porosity.


These polymeric materials can be supplied as fibers into the composition to increase the material intrinsic strength. An important aspect for chemical ion-dipole adhesion of these fibers is the size and/or surface area. The size or surface area can be defined by the aspect ratio (length:diameter). The preferred aspect ratio is from 2:1 to 50:1; more preferable from 10:1 to 35:1. The overall length of the fiber can be up to 5 mm; however, since the material could be used as bone to bone adhesive, the length of the fiber may be more appropriate at lengths up to 2 mm.


The additives that act as visual aids in the surgical procedure include colorants such as a pigment or dye to aid in determining coverage and depth of the applied cement or contrast agents such as barium salts in determining depth on a radiograph.


Other additives can be incorporated into the compositions that enhance the bone healing rate (osteogenic) These additives comprise a class of osteogenic growth factors including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP's), such as BMP 7, stem cells, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and/or anti-osteoporotic agents such as bisphosphonates can be contemplated for incorporation into the composition.


Other additives that can be incorporated into the composition are infection preventatives such as broad spectrum antibiotics and anti-infectic additives.


The compositions as described herein have many unique properties not found in prior calcium phosphate compositions. One particularly important property is that the compositions have a tacky state immediately subsequent to mixing with an aqueous medium. This tack property is retained for a number of minutes, sometimes up to about 12 minutes depending on the application requirement, typically up to about 4 minutes, and preferably up to about 2 minutes, after mixing with the aqueous medium. The time of the tacky state is dependent on a number of factors including relative ratio of the components, the particle sizes of the component materials, the presence of additives and the like. During this time the compositions will adhere bone to bone and bone to other materials, often without the need for external clamping or other application of pressure. The tacky state is not so aggressive that the composition will permanently affix the materials together at this point in time. Rather the tacky state can allow the materials to be moved relative to each other and also to be re-opposed without appreciable loss of ultimate cured strength. This is important in a medical setting so that the user can make sure the bone and the other material to be adhered to the bone are in the proper position relative to each other.


The tacky state is followed by a putty state. In the putty state, the tacky property has substantially disappeared and the compositions can be shaped or sculpted. In addition, during the putty state, the composition can be formed into shapes or used to fill voids in bone in a manner similar to putty. This putty state is retained for a number of minutes, sometimes up to 15 minutes depending on the application requirement, typically up to about 8 minutes, and preferably up to about 5 minutes, after mixing with the aqueous medium. Like the tacky states, the putty state is dependant on a number of factors including the relative ratio of the components, the presence of additives, the particle size of the components and the like. Because the items to be affixed can be repositioned during the tacky state or the compositions can be shaped during the putty state, this combined time of the tacky state and the putty state is some times referred to as the working time. Typical compositions have a working time of up to about 8 minutes from initial mixing and often the working time is up to about 5 minutes after which time the compositions have sufficiently begun hardening that further manipulation will result in degradation of ultimate strength of the bond.


After the putty state, the compositions harden like a cement to form a substantially permanent bond between the materials. In the cement state, the composition hardens and the materials that have been affixed to each other cannot be separated without the application of significant force. The compositions typically will begin to harden within about 8 minutes, and often within about 5 minutes, after mixing with the aqueous medium. The amount of time to reach the cement state is also dependant of the same factors listed above.


A further important property of the compositions is that these compositions have significant coherency and integrity within a wet environment. In the medical field, this would include a surgical site and a wound or similar situation where blood and other bodily fluids are present. The tacky state, the putty state, and the cement state all occur in either a wet environment or in a dry environment. In order to get the desirable properties, the user need not ensure that the application site is clean and dry. In a wet environment, the compositions tend to remain together and the presence of the liquid does not significantly affect the integrity of the composition or the ultimate strength properties.


While not wishing to be bound by theory, compositions of the present disclosure are believed to function as follows: the TTCP, which is basic in nature, reacts with the small amino acid phosphate species, which is acidic in nature, upon mixing with the aqueous medium and forms a hardened, layered structure upon curing. This reaction is exothermic; the degree of exothermic activity depends on a number of factors including the volume of the composition. The low pH nature of the compounds that are structurally similar to phosphoserine enable the hydroxyl of phosphate or phosphonate and COOH functional group to bond through ionic interaction with the calcium ions from within the TTCP. This resulting reactive intermediate continues a cascade of ionic interactions with calcium and phosphate ions within the TTCP or HA on the bone surface or any other metal ions of the metal implants. This series of interactions provides transient material having the tacky properties while curing and the adhesion strength that increases upon cure.


The exothermic properties of the composition when curing are prevalent when mixing as a large volume bone void filler (usually greater then 10 cc) and this may serve as an effective means to kill the residual tumor cells locally that remain after surgical bone tumor removal.


The exothermic properties of the composition may lead to necrosis of local tissue and this also reduces the adhesive working time. The amount of heat released by the exothermic reaction is mainly influenced by the volume of the composition, the size of the particles and the ratio of compound that is structurally similar to phosphoserine to TTCP. With larger volumes of composition, more heat is released to the surrounding tissue. With volumes less than or equal to about 1 cc, the heat release is negligible with maximum temperature reached during the curing of the adhesive being below about 40° C. The higher volume compositions greater than about 1 cc, led to considerable heat release, even exceeding about 60° C. in compositions greater than about 5 cc. To manage this exothermic heat release to below about 45° C., the particle size distribution of the TTCP, and the ratio of TTCP to compound that is structurally similar to phosphoserine can be chosen appropriately. The smaller TTCP particles dissolve and react faster due to a higher specific surface area; therefore, to reduce the exothermic heat release, the composition can be adjusted by choosing a TTCP particle size distribution which generally has a mean particle size greater than about 15 μm, more specifically about 25 μm. In addition, the greater amount of TTCP to the compound that is structurally similar to phosphoserine used, the faster the reaction occurs due to the number of calcium ions available for bonding. Exothermic heat release can be limited by adding more compound that is structurally similar to phosphoserine to the composition. To further reduce the exothermic heat release, endothermic additives can be incorporated into the composition to slow the reaction rate; these include polyols (such as sorbitol or mannitol) and/or PEG. The factors discussed here can be chosen to design several compositions; all of which have exothermic profiles which limit or eliminate necrotic reactions to local tissues while tailoring the compositions with sufficient working time for the clinical application.


The compositions when mixed with aqueous medium typically have a creamy or a tacky paste consistency initially. Also, the mixing of the compositions with the aqueous medium does not require a high level of force or shear. Generally, simple hand mixing, such as with a spatula, is sufficient in most instances. It is envisioned that the present compositions may be applied via injection through a syringe or other suitable pressurized implement, applied with a spatula, and as otherwise desirable by a user. The creamy or tacky viscosity allows for application of the composition to the defect site for a defined period of time. The compositions allow the bone to be repositioned several times within about 4 minutes and preferably within about 2 minutes without losing tack properties. If the compositions need to be injected through a syringe or cannula, the viscosity of the composition during the working time can be important. For these situations, viscosities of the compositions herein should be preferably below about 150 centipoise.


Still further embodiments have a consistency similar to putty. These embodiments are useful for filling larger defects, have sculpting properties, or for mechanical interlocking into cancellous bone. These compositions hold their cohesive, tacky, and sculpting properties over a longer period of time even when subjected to a wet field. The compositions have working time for sculpting sometimes up to about 15 minutes depending on the application requirement, typically up to about 8 minutes, and preferably up to about 5 minutes, after mixing with the aqueous medium. Formulations with an increased amount of small amino acid phosphate species greater than about 25% w/w or increased TTCP mean particle size greater than about 250 microns tend to have longer working times and seem to be suitable for use in situations were the putty will fill defects in structures that are well supported by surrounding bone. In these situations the putty does not need to harden as fast provided it maintains its cohesive properties in the wet field. Another property of the compositions is that the compositions will adhere to themselves as well as to an external surface such as bone. This is useful in situations where a shape is formed during the putty state and this shape can then adhere to bone. Also, in some instances a user may apply a mass of the composition to a bone or other surface and then shape the composition into the final desired shape during the working time of the composition.


Compositions which have a putty consistency to be used a void filler can be enhanced by incorporating macro porous granules or chips to allow for new bone ingrowth. These granules may come from synthetic sources such α-TCP or β-TCP granules or it may be preferred to select the granules or chips from autologous bone sources or demineralized bone to enhance the bone healing rate.


It is further envisioned that the cement compositions disclosed herein may be packaged into kits that may include a vial containing the TTCP with the small amino acid phosphate species pre-filled together and packaged under vacuum, nitrogen, or dry air to preserve the shelf life. Further, if additives are used, they may be included within this vial or in a separate vial. The aqueous medium is provided in a separate vial. The kit may include mixing bowls, stirring sticks, spatulas, syringes, and/or any other desirable component for application.


Composition of the current disclosure are envisioned to provide ease of use in different medical applications based on ease of application, duration of use before cure, resistance to in vivo environments, extended maneuverability of bone fragments and/or implant devices prior to cure onset, good load bearing capabilities after cure, and good ultimate bond strength. For example, compositions may have an adequate working period after mixing sometimes up to about 15 minutes depending on the application requirement, typically up to about 8 minutes or less, and preferably up to about 5 minutes or less. Further, the relative force of pressure required to inject the composition from an appropriately sized syringe may remain constant or below a certain injection force threshold from the point of mixing and loading the syringe to the end of the working period. It is contemplated that bone fragments adhered together or implanted devices may exhibit moderate separation strengths within the working period. Such moderate separation strengths may be exhibited regardless of the relative compressive force used during apposition. It is further contemplated that cement compositions of the present disclosure may have sufficient material cohesion when applied in moist, wet, greasy and/or fatty saline environments, such as in vivo settings, thereby reducing the need for surface preparation and maintaining a dry environment. As well, good capacity for supporting passive movement and maintaining load and non-load bearing bone fragment alignment after surgery during initial rehabilitation period and active range of motion rehabilitation period are envisioned for cement compositions contemplated herein.


Typical compositions exhibit an adhesive strength upon curing, typically after greater than about 10 minutes from initial mixing, in the range of about 250 to about 2000 kPa on cancellous bone and from about 250 to about 10,000 kPa on cortical bone in at least one of compression, tension, shear, and/or bending. Compositions can be chosen to achieve the strength in these ranges; the level of strength required is dependent upon the clinical application. Also, it is important to note that the curing can be accomplished either in a wet environment, such as in bodily fluids, or in a dry environment, and the ultimate strength of the bond after cure does not seem to be significantly affected.


In the following examples all shear, tension and bending testing was done using an Instron Force test machine (Model #5564) setup as follows. For shear testing, the sample was supported and fastened to the machine at one end of the sample and the other end was left free and unsupported. For shear testing the samples have a bond surface that was 90° to the face of the bone samples unless there was an indication that the bond surface was at an angle of 45° from the face of the bone surface. The force test probe was placed in plane against the top of the bond line of the sample and force was applied until failure. For tension testing each end of the sample was clamped to the testing machine and the force was applied at 90° to the bond to pull the sample apart. When the bond fails the result was recorded. For the 3 point bending testing each end of the sample was supported without clamping the sample to create a span distance of 35 mm. Force was applied by the force probe to the top of the sample at the center point (same position as the bond line) between both ends until the bond fails. The TTCP that was used in all the following examples was a commercially available material that included from about 17% to 32% of related impurities. These materials all contained about 68% to 83% TTCP.


Example 1

A cement formulation having the following formulation: 250 mg OPLS, 400 mg TTCP, and 133 μl of water was mixed and applied to a 10 mm×10 mm×2 mm thick sheet of either 10/90 PLGA or 50/50 PLGA as shown in the table and to a cortical bone cube. Before strength testing the samples were allowed to cure for 10 minutes submersed in water at 30° C. The test was repeated 6 times and compared to two commercially available calcium phosphate based bone cements that were mixed in accord with label directions.












Example 1: PLGA Square Adhesion to


Bovine Cortical Bone, 10 min cure









Example
















Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



1A
1B
1A
1B
1C
1D











TOM 250 (MPa)
HydroSet (MPa)
Norian (MPa)














PLGA
PLGA
PLGA
PLGA
PLGA
PLGA



10/90
50/50
10/90
50/50
10/90
50/50


















0.64
0.35
0.16
0.12
0.07
0.05



0.72
0.38
0.08
0.08
0.2
0.01



0.96
0.43
0.11
0.12
0.03
0.03



0.83
0.47
0.23
0.08
0.12
0.05



0.99
0.34
0.22
0.04
0.14
0.01



0.69
0.42
0.13
0.03
0.09


average
0.81
0.40
0.16
0.08
0.11
0.03


St. Dev.
0.15
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02









As shown in FIG. 2, a small amount (10) of each of the above formulations was applied both to cortical bone (20) that has been clamped in place (clamps not shown for clarity) and to the appropriate PLGA sheet (30) and tested using a shear testing device (40) (blade only shown for clarity) with a force vector (F) applied directly to the cement bond (10). As seen from the data, the formulations of Examples 1A and 1B had significantly higher shear strength than the Comparative Examples 1A-D.


Example 2

A cement formulation having the following formulation: 250 mg OPLS, 400 mg TTCP, and 133 μl of water was mixed and applied between two 10 mm×10 mm×2 mm thick sheets of either 10/90 PLGA or 50/50 PLGA as shown in the table. Before strength testing the samples were allowed to cure for 10 minutes submersed in water at 30° C. The test was repeated at minimum 6 times and compared to two commercially available calcium phosphate based bone cements that were mixed in accord with label directions.












Example 2: PLGA Square Adhesion to PLGA square, 10 min cure









Example
















Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



2A
2B
2A
2B
2C
2D











TOM 250 (MPa)
HydroSet (MPa)
Norian (MPa)














PLGA
PLGA
PLGA
PLGA
PLGA
PLGA



10/90
50/50
10/90
50/50
10/90
50/50


















0.64
0.35
0.16
0.12
0.07
0.05



0.72
0.38
0.08
0.08
0.2
0.01



0.96
0.43
0.11
0.12
0.03
0.03



0.83
0.47
0.23
0.08
0.12



0.99
0.34
0.22
0.04
0.14



0.69
0.42
0.13
0.03
0.09


average
0.81
0.40
0.16
0.08
0.11
0.03


St. Dev.
0.15
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.02









As shown in FIG. 2, a small amount (50) of each of the above formulations was applied both to the appropriate PLGA sheets (60) and the sheets were pressed together and tested using the same shear testing device with a force (F) applied directly to the cement bond. The one polymer sheet (6) was adhered to cortical bone (20) that has been clamped in place (clamps not shown for clarity). As seen from the data, the formulations of Examples 2A and 2B had significantly higher shear strength than the Comparative Examples 2A-2D.


Example 3

In order to see the effect on the intrinsic material strength, polymer fibers were added to the compositions to form an interpenetrating network. A series of compositions set out in Table 1 were prepared and tested as follows. Each composition was mixed for 20 seconds in a polycarbonate bowl using either a polycarbonate pestle or spatula. After mixing, the composition was applied to both surfaces of bovine cortical bone cubes that had apposing faces using a spatula. The faces were created with a 90° angle for the bending tests (9×9.5 mm face). Prior to testing, the bone cubes were incubated within a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution bath at 30° C. and had pre-dampened surfaces during composition application. By 90 seconds from the start of mixing, the apposing faces were adhered together and aligned with minimal hand compression force for 10 seconds and were immediately transferred and submerged within a PBS solution bath held at 30° C. for the duration of 10 minutes. After the samples cured, the cubes were loaded onto the 3 pt bending sample fixture and tested on an Instron force test machine. The compositions that form an interpenetrating network with polymer fibers (3A & 3B) show increased bending strength compared to the fiber free composition (Comparative Example 3) that does not form an interpenetrating polymer network system.












TABLE 1





Composition
Comp. Ex. 3
3A
3B





















TTCP
400
mg
400
mg
400
mg


Phosphoserine
185
mg
250
mg
250
mg


Water
130
μl
175
μl
175
μl


β-TCP granules
100
mg
133
mg
133
mg


Calcium carbonate powder
14
mg
14
mg
14
mg


Silk, braided & ground fiber


7
mg


PLGA (10:90) fiber




25
mg


3 pt Bending Strength (MPa)
0.75
MPa
5.65
MPa
4.68
MPa









Example 4

The procedure of Example 2 was repeated except that the PLGA sheets were replace by polycarbonate and acrylic sheets. The surface treatment on these sheets was removed by rubbing the surface with the edge of a glass slide. The polycarbonate sheet was clear polycarbonate sheet 0.236 inches thick (part 8574K11) and the acrylic sheet was clear 0.25 inch thick acrylic sheet (part 8560K354), both available from McMaster-Carr, Aurora, Ohio. An attempt was made to test the Norian cement as was done in Example 2 however the Norian cements displayed no adhesion to the polycarbonate or acrylic sheets and the cement disintegrated over time in a wet environment. The test was repeated at minimum 6 times.












Example 4: Other polymer square adhesion


to other polymer, 10 min cure










Example











4A
4B










TOM 250











Polycarbonate
Acrylic
















0.79 MPa
1.36 MPa




 0.8 MPa
1.39 MPa




0.51 MPa
1.25 MPa




0.73 MPa
0.74 MPa




0.72 MPa
0.67 MPa




0.71 MPa
0.58 MPa



average
0.71 MPa
1.00 MPa



St. Dev.
0.10 MPa
0.37 MPa










INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION

Cement compositions disclosed herein provide adhesive and cohesive strength through mechanical and chemical interlocking with bone substrates. The cement formulations have a tack and/or sticky quality that allows temporary adherence early in the curing process and a delay in significant curing early on. The cement formulations may mimic natural bone architecture and provide superior mechanical strength over longer periods of time relative to convention cement formulations.


The disclosure has been presented in an illustrative manner in order to enable a person of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the disclosure, and the terminology used is intended to be in the nature of description rather than of limitation. It is understood that the disclosure may be practiced in ways other than as specifically disclosed, and that all modifications, equivalents, and variations of the present disclosure, which are possible in light of the above teachings and ascertainable to a person of ordinary skill in the art, are specifically included within the scope of the impending claims. All patents, patent publications, and other references cited herein are incorporated herein by reference.

Claims
  • 1. A method of adhering a material to a polymer comprising the steps of: placing a composition between the material and the polymer wherein the composition comprises:(i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound,(ii) an amino acid compound of the formula,
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), polyglycolide, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(teramethylglycolic-acid), poly(dioxanone), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(tetramethylglycolic-acid-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone-co-L-lactide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate), poly(methyl-methacrylate), poly(acrylate), polyamines, polyimidazoles, poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone), collagen, silk, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, or a mixture thereof.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate and the amino acid compound is phosphoserine.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein: the multivalent metal phosphate compound is present in an amount from about 10 to about 90 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of the multivalent metal phosphate compound and the amino acid compound.
  • 5. A method of adhering bone fragments together using a composition comprising placing the composition on one or more bone fragments, wherein the composition comprises: (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound,(ii) an amino acid compound of the formula,
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the method is used during a surgery.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), polyglycolide, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(teramethylglycolic-acid), poly(dioxanone), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(tetramethylglycolic-acid-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone-co-L-lactide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate), poly(methyl-methacrylate), poly(acrylate), polyamines, polyimidazoles, poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone), collagen, silk, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, or a mixture thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein: (i) the multivalent metal phosphate compound is present in an amount from about 10 to about 90 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of the multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound; and(ii) the polymer is present in an amount from about 0.1 to about 30 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound.
  • 9. The method of claim 5, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, the amino acid compound is phosphoserine, or the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide).
  • 10. A method of enhancing screw and/or bone anchor fixation in a subject using a composition comprising placing the composition and screw and/or bone anchor in or on a bone, wherein the composition comprises: (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound,(ii) an amino acid compound of the formula,
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the method is used during surgery.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the composition is placed within a cavity within the bone.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), polyglycolide, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(teramethylglycolic-acid), poly(dioxanone), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(tetramethylglycolic-acid-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone-co-L-lactide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate), poly(methyl-methacrylate), poly(acrylate), polyamines, polyimidazoles, poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone), collagen, silk, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, or a mixture thereof.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein: (i) the multivalent metal phosphate compound is present in an amount from about 10 to about 90 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of the multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound; and(ii) the polymer is present in an amount from about 0.1 to about 30 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, the amino acid compound is phosphoserine, or the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide).
  • 16. A method of attaching a plate to a material using a composition, comprising placing the composition on the plate and/or material, wherein the composition comprises: (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound,(ii) an amino acid compound of the formula,
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the plate comprises a metal or a bioresorbable material.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), polyglycolide, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(teramethylglycolic-acid), poly(dioxanone), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(tetramethylglycolic-acid-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone-co-L-lactide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate), poly(methyl-methacrylate), poly(acrylate), polyamines, polyimidazoles, poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone), collagen, silk, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, or a mixture thereof.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, wherein: (i) the multivalent metal phosphate compound is present in an amount from about 10 to about 90 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of the multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound; and(ii) the polymer is present in an amount from about 0.1 to about 30 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, the amino acid compound is phosphoserine, or the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide).
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, alpha tricalcium phosphate, or beta tricalcium phosphate.
  • 22. The method of claim 5, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, alpha tricalcium phosphate, or beta tricalcium phosphate.
  • 23. The method of claim 10, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, alpha tricalcium phosphate, or beta tricalcium phosphate.
  • 24. The method of claim 16, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, alpha tricalcium phosphate, or beta tricalcium phosphate.
  • 25. A method of enhancing fixation of a joint replacement prosthesis to a bone in a subject using a composition, comprising placing the composition and the joint replacement prosthesis in or on a bone, wherein the composition comprises: (i) a multivalent metal phosphate compound,(ii) an amino acid compound of the formula,
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), polyglycolide, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(teramethylglycolic-acid), poly(dioxanone), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(tetramethylglycolic-acid-co-dioxanone-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone-co-L-lactide-co-trimethylene-carbonate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate), poly(methyl-methacrylate), poly(acrylate), polyamines, polyimidazoles, poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone), collagen, silk, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, gelatin, or a mixture thereof.
  • 27. The method of claim 25, wherein: (i) the multivalent metal phosphate compound is present in an amount from about 10 to about 90 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of the multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound; and(ii) the polymer is present in an amount from about 0.1 to about 30 weight percent based on the weight of the combination of multivalent metal phosphate compound, the polymer, and the amino acid compound.
  • 28. The method of claim 25, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, alpha tricalcium phosphate, or beta tricalcium phosphate.
  • 29. The method of claim 25, wherein the multivalent metal phosphate compound comprises tetracalcium phosphate, the amino acid compound is phosphoserine, or the polymer comprises poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide).
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/980,022, filed Dec. 28, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 9,265,857, filed May 10, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/333,478, filed May 11, 2010. The entire contents of each are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (249)
Number Name Date Kind
3899556 Heide et al. Aug 1975 A
4183915 Gaffar et al. Jan 1980 A
4234972 Hench et al. Nov 1980 A
4373217 Draenert Feb 1983 A
4491987 Park Jan 1985 A
4563432 Ehlert et al. Jan 1986 A
4563489 Urist Jan 1986 A
4596574 Urist Jun 1986 A
4600546 Grundei Jul 1986 A
4610692 Eitenmuller et al. Sep 1986 A
4629464 Takata et al. Dec 1986 A
4634720 Dorman et al. Jan 1987 A
4636526 Dorman et al. Jan 1987 A
4645503 Lin et al. Feb 1987 A
4654314 Takagi et al. Mar 1987 A
4661536 Dorman et al. Apr 1987 A
4672032 Slavkin et al. Jun 1987 A
4693986 Vit et al. Sep 1987 A
4713076 Draenert Dec 1987 A
4737411 Graves, Jr. et al. Apr 1988 A
4777153 Sonuparlak et al. Oct 1988 A
4781721 Grundei Nov 1988 A
4797282 Wahlig et al. Jan 1989 A
4798585 Inoue et al. Jan 1989 A
4839215 Starling et al. Jun 1989 A
4842603 Draenert Jun 1989 A
4846838 Takai et al. Jul 1989 A
4861733 White Aug 1989 A
4869906 Dingeldein et al. Sep 1989 A
4878914 Miwa et al. Nov 1989 A
RE33161 Brown et al. Feb 1990 E
4911720 Collier Mar 1990 A
RE33221 Brown et al. May 1990 E
4963145 Takagi et al. Oct 1990 A
4965039 Schuetz Oct 1990 A
5011495 Hollinger Apr 1991 A
5017518 Hirayama et al. May 1991 A
5030396 Saita et al. Jul 1991 A
5034352 Vit et al. Jul 1991 A
5053212 Constantz et al. Oct 1991 A
5055307 Tsuru et al. Oct 1991 A
5059388 Kihara et al. Oct 1991 A
5064436 Ogiso et al. Nov 1991 A
5089195 Ichitsuka et al. Feb 1992 A
5092888 Iwamoto et al. Mar 1992 A
5106626 Parsons et al. Apr 1992 A
5135394 Hakamatsuka et al. Aug 1992 A
5149368 Liu et al. Sep 1992 A
5152791 Hakamatsuka et al. Oct 1992 A
5171720 Kawakami Dec 1992 A
5207710 Chu et al. May 1993 A
5258029 Chu et al. Nov 1993 A
5263985 Bao et al. Nov 1993 A
5279831 Constantz et al. Jan 1994 A
5306303 Lynch Apr 1994 A
5318779 Hakamatsuka et al. Jun 1994 A
5338356 Hirano et al. Aug 1994 A
5338772 Bauer et al. Aug 1994 A
5385887 Yim et al. Jan 1995 A
5398483 Smith et al. Mar 1995 A
5409982 Imura et al. Apr 1995 A
5422340 Ammann et al. Jun 1995 A
5439951 Glimcher et al. Aug 1995 A
5464440 Johansson Nov 1995 A
5492697 Boyan et al. Feb 1996 A
5508267 Czemuszka et al. Apr 1996 A
5520923 Tjia et al. May 1996 A
RE35267 Tsuru et al. Jun 1996 E
5522893 Chow et al. Jun 1996 A
5522894 Draenert Jun 1996 A
5525148 Chow et al. Jun 1996 A
5531794 Takagi et al. Jul 1996 A
5536575 Imura et al. Jul 1996 A
5542973 Chow et al. Aug 1996 A
5545254 Chow et al. Aug 1996 A
5571185 Schug Nov 1996 A
5574075 Draenert Nov 1996 A
5597897 Ron et al. Jan 1997 A
5626861 Laurencin et al. May 1997 A
5641502 Skalla et al. Jun 1997 A
5650108 Nies et al. Jul 1997 A
5681872 Erbe Oct 1997 A
5695729 Chow et al. Dec 1997 A
5707962 Chen et al. Jan 1998 A
5717006 Daculsi et al. Feb 1998 A
5741329 Agrawal et al. Apr 1998 A
5766618 Laurencin et al. Jun 1998 A
5776193 Kwan et al. Jul 1998 A
5782971 Constantz et al. Jul 1998 A
5820632 Constantz et al. Oct 1998 A
5851670 Mitoh et al. Dec 1998 A
5866155 Laurencin et al. Feb 1999 A
5897953 Ogawa et al. Apr 1999 A
5914121 Robey et al. Jun 1999 A
5914356 Erbe Jun 1999 A
5922025 Hubbard Jul 1999 A
5939388 Rosen et al. Aug 1999 A
5962427 Goldstein et al. Oct 1999 A
5988171 Sohn et al. Nov 1999 A
6010648 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2000 A
6018095 Lerch et al. Jan 2000 A
6027744 Vacanti et al. Feb 2000 A
6030635 Gertzman et al. Feb 2000 A
6048964 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6051247 Hench et al. Apr 2000 A
6063117 Perry May 2000 A
6077989 Kandel et al. Jun 2000 A
6080801 Draenert et al. Jun 2000 A
6110503 Rickey et al. Aug 2000 A
6118043 Nies et al. Sep 2000 A
6129928 Sarangapani et al. Oct 2000 A
6136029 Johnson et al. Oct 2000 A
6165486 Marra et al. Dec 2000 A
6180605 Chen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180606 Chen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187046 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187047 Kwan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194006 Lyons et al. Feb 2001 B1
6201065 Pathak et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203574 Kawamura Mar 2001 B1
6210612 Pickrell et al. Apr 2001 B1
6235225 Okada et al. May 2001 B1
6235665 Pickrell et al. May 2001 B1
6261322 Despres, III et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280478 Richter et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281257 Ma et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287341 Lee et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296667 Johnson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306297 Ichitsuka et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316091 Richart et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325992 Chow et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331312 Lee et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335430 Qvist Jan 2002 B1
6340648 Imura et al. Jan 2002 B1
6346123 McKay Feb 2002 B1
6350462 Hakamatsuka et al. Feb 2002 B1
6358532 Starling et al. Mar 2002 B2
6376573 White et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395036 Czemuszka et al. May 2002 B1
6432437 Hubbard Aug 2002 B1
6432919 Wang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6451059 Janas et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458162 Koblish et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479418 Li et al. Nov 2002 B2
6495156 Wenz et al. Dec 2002 B2
6511510 de Bruijn et al. Jan 2003 B1
6521246 Sapieszko et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524345 Valimaa et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527810 Johnson et al. Mar 2003 B2
6533821 Lally Mar 2003 B1
6540784 Barlow et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547866 Edwards et al. Apr 2003 B1
6585992 Pugh et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589590 Czemuszka et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592787 Pickrell et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599515 Delmotte Jul 2003 B1
6616742 Lin et al. Sep 2003 B2
6667049 Janas et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670293 Edwards et al. Dec 2003 B2
6692761 Mahmood et al. Feb 2004 B2
6696073 Boyce et al. Feb 2004 B2
6709744 Day et al. Mar 2004 B1
6790233 Brodke et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793725 Chow et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800245 Erbe et al. Oct 2004 B1
6808561 Genge et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808585 Boyce et al. Oct 2004 B2
6863899 Koblish et al. Mar 2005 B2
6949251 Dalal et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955716 Xu et al. Oct 2005 B2
6987136 Erbe et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987170 Silverman et al. Jan 2006 B1
7018460 Xu et al. Mar 2006 B2
7037304 Lyles et al. May 2006 B2
7045125 Erbe et al. May 2006 B2
7066999 Lin et al. Jun 2006 B2
7081161 Genge et al. Jul 2006 B2
7091260 K hn Aug 2006 B2
7122057 Beam et al. Oct 2006 B2
7172629 McKay Feb 2007 B2
7238203 Bagga et al. Jul 2007 B2
7258735 Lin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7270705 Lin et al. Sep 2007 B2
7294187 Chow et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303646 Qvist Dec 2007 B2
7318841 Tofighi et al. Jan 2008 B2
7357941 Dalal et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390498 Dalal et al. Jun 2008 B2
7407542 Lemaitre et al. Aug 2008 B2
7416602 Murphy et al. Aug 2008 B2
7473312 Barralet et al. Jan 2009 B2
7494950 Armitage et al. Feb 2009 B2
7514248 Gower et al. Apr 2009 B2
7514249 Gower et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527687 Genge et al. May 2009 B2
7544496 Gower et al. Jun 2009 B2
7547449 Gower et al. Jun 2009 B2
7575628 Lu et al. Aug 2009 B2
7589133 Pomrink Sep 2009 B2
7619016 Dickens et al. Nov 2009 B2
7628851 Armitage et al. Dec 2009 B2
7632878 Xu et al. Dec 2009 B2
7648728 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2010 B2
8173149 Dalal et al. May 2012 B2
8232327 Garigapati et al. Jul 2012 B2
8273803 Garigapati et al. Sep 2012 B2
9265857 Garigapati et al. Feb 2016 B2
20010014667 Chen et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010051815 Esplin Dec 2001 A1
20020022885 Ochi Feb 2002 A1
20020035402 de Bruijn et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020082694 McKay Jun 2002 A1
20020114795 Thorne et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115742 Trieu et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020151466 Hubbard et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020193883 Wironen Dec 2002 A1
20030009235 Manrique et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030031698 Roeder et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030069638 Barlow et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030152606 Gerber Aug 2003 A1
20040002770 King et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040059416 Murray Mar 2004 A1
20050217538 Reinstort et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060089646 Bonutti Apr 2006 A1
20060096504 Grover et al. May 2006 A1
20060263443 Chow et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070092580 Chow et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070092856 Chow et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070221093 Erdrich et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080009955 Shimp et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028992 Lee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080069852 Shimp et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080095817 Murphy Apr 2008 A1
20080187571 Clineff et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080188945 Boyce et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090028949 Leonard et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028960 Leonard et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090158964 Insley et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090220475 Bohner et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090258966 Hirayarna et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100120923 Stewart et al. May 2010 A1
20100129416 Murphy et al. May 2010 A1
20100168798 Clineff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100305626 Stewart et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110150963 Clineff et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110151027 Clineff et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110277931 Garigapati et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110287067 Stewart Nov 2011 A1
20120237568 Murphy et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (81)
Number Date Country
2620890 Nov 1977 DE
4216496 Nov 1993 DE
29922585 Jul 2000 DE
10063119 Aug 2001 DE
0267624 May 1988 EP
0360244 Mar 1990 EP
0987032 Mar 2000 EP
1 027 897 Aug 2000 EP
1142597 Oct 2001 EP
2078696 Jan 1982 GB
2 323 083 Sep 1998 GB
2 348 872 Oct 2000 GB
2354518 Mar 2001 GB
59101145 Jun 1984 JP
59131346 Jul 1984 JP
59171546 Sep 1984 JP
60142857 Jul 1985 JP
6141466 Feb 1986 JP
6145748 Mar 1986 JP
6168054 Apr 1986 JP
61127658 Jun 1986 JP
63046167 Feb 1988 JP
64-030572 Feb 1989 JP
1108143 Apr 1989 JP
1126977 May 1989 JP
1230412 Sep 1989 JP
3191963 Aug 1991 JP
364482 Oct 1991 JP
429630 May 1992 JP
5042168 Feb 1993 JP
526504 Apr 1993 JP
5208877 Aug 1993 JP
566909 Sep 1993 JP
5237178 Sep 1993 JP
5305134 Nov 1993 JP
588687 Dec 1993 JP
655219 Jul 1994 JP
6296676 Oct 1994 JP
6102582 Dec 1994 JP
07-023994 Jan 1995 JP
7291759 Nov 1995 JP
9030988 Feb 1997 JP
11276468 Oct 1999 JP
2000262608 Sep 2000 JP
2001058885 Mar 2001 JP
3231135 Sep 2001 JP
1986001113 Feb 1986 WO
1987004110 Jul 1987 WO
1987007495 Dec 1987 WO
1993007835 Apr 1993 WO
1993015721 Aug 1993 WO
1993020859 Oct 1993 WO
1994015652 Jul 1994 WO
1994015653 Jul 1994 WO
1995021634 Aug 1995 WO
1997031661 Sep 1997 WO
1997045147 Dec 1997 WO
1997046178 Dec 1997 WO
1998038949 Sep 1998 WO
1998047485 Oct 1998 WO
1999016478 Apr 1999 WO
1999016479 Apr 1999 WO
1999020319 Apr 1999 WO
1999037246 Jul 1999 WO
00018443 Apr 2000 WO
00035511 Jun 2000 WO
00045870 Aug 2000 WO
00045871 Aug 2000 WO
00050104 Aug 2000 WO
01003709 Jan 2001 WO
01013970 Mar 2001 WO
01028603 Apr 2001 WO
01029189 Apr 2001 WO
01044141 Jun 2001 WO
01054746 Aug 2001 WO
01066163 Sep 2001 WO
0211781 Feb 2002 WO
0215881 Feb 2002 WO
2006019649 Feb 2006 WO
2010056811 May 2010 WO
2011143226 Nov 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
(Vo-Dinh) Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine, CRC Press (Jan. 24, 2007) [retrieved on Feb. 8, 2012] entire document retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://books.google.com/books/aboutNanotechnology-in-biology-and-medicine.html?id=t9IPt1Hu6bAC>, (1 page).
A. Reinstorf et al., “Phosphoserine—a convenient compound for modification of calcium phosphate bone cement collagen composites,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15 (2004), pp. 451-455, 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dresden, Germany.
Andriano, K.P. et al., “Preliminary In Vivo Studies on the Osteogenic Potential of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Delivered from an Absorbable Puttylike Polymer Matrix,” J. Biomed. Mater Re (Appl. Biomater.) 53:36-43 (2000). (8 pages).
Benoit, M.-A. et al., “Antibiotic-Loaded Plaster of Paris Implants Coated With Poly Lactide-co-glycolide as a Controlled Release Delivery System for the Treatment of Bone Infections,” International Orthopaedics 21(6):403-408 (1997). (6 pages).
Breitbart, A.S. et al., “Tricalcium Phosphate and Osteogenin: A Bioactive Onlay Bone Graft Substitute,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 96:699-708 (1995). (10 pages).
Bucholz, R.W. et al., “Hydroxyapatite and Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Graft Substitutes,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 18:323-334 (1987). (12 pages).
Bundy et al. “The Effect of Surface Preparation on Metal/Bone Cement Interfacial Strength” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 21, Issue 6, pp. 773-805 esp. abstract, Jun. 1987.
Chow et al. “A Natural Bone Cement—A Laboratory Novelty Led to the Development of Revolutionary New Biomaterials” Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1029-1033, Nov. 2001.
Chow, L.C., “Solubility of Calcium Phosphates,” Monogr Oral Sci. Basel. Karger 18:94-111 (2001). (18 pages).
Clarke “Role of Ceramic Implants, Design and Clinical Success With Total Hip Prosthetic Ceramic-to-Ceramic Bearings” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 282, pp. 19-30 esp. abstract, Sep. 1992.
Eggli, P.S. et al., “Porous Hydroxyapatite and Tricalcium Phosphate Cylinders with Two Different Pore Size Ranges Implanted in the Cancellous Bone of Rabbits,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 232:127-138 (1988). (12 pages).
Fujimura et al. “A bioactive bone cement containing Bis-GMA resin and A-W glass-ceramic as an augmentation graft material on mandibular bone” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 659-667 esp. abstract, Oct. 2003.
Gerhart, T.N. et al., “In vitro Characterization and Biomechanical Optimization of a Biodegradable Particulate Composite Bone Cement,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 22:1071-1082 (1988). (12 pages).
Gombotz, W.R. et al., “Stimulation of Bone Healing by Transforming Growth Factor-Beta1 Released from Polymeric or Ceramic Implants,” Journal of Applied Biomaterials 5(2):141-150 (1994). (10 pages).
Hua, W. et al. “New Bone Formation in the in vivo Implantation of Bioceramics,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 105, pp. 753-757 (1992) (5 pages).
Hutmacher, D.W., “Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Bone and Cartilage,” Biomaterials 21:2529-2543 (2000). (14 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/64135 dated May 26, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 21, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/060956, Applicant Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (13 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/64135 dated Apr. 2, 2010.
Ishikawa et al. “Behavior of a Calcium Phosphate Cement in Simulated Blood Plasma in Vitro” Dental Materials, vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 26-32 esp. abstract, Jan. 1994.
Laffargue, PH. et at., “Evaluation of Human Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Loaded Tricalcium Phosphate Implants in Rabbits' Bone Defects,” Bone 25:55S-58S (1999). (4 pages).
Lange, T.A. et al. “Granular Tricalcium Phosphate in Large Cancellous Defects,” Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 467-472 (1986) (6 pages).
Mai et al. “O-phospho-L-serine: A Modulator of Bone Healing in Calciumphosphate Cements” Biomedizinische Technik, vol. 53, Issue 5, p. 229-233 esp. abstract, Oct. 2008.
Metsger, D.S. et al., “Histomorphometric Analysis of Tricalcium Phosphate Ceramic Implanted Into Turkeys,” Bone 14:243-248 (1993). (6 pages).
Nade, S. et at., “Osteogenesis After Bone and Bone Marrow Transplantation,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 181: 255-263 (1983). (9 pages).
Nery, E.B. et al., “Tissue Response to Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Ceramic With Different Ratios of HA/betaTCP in Periodontal Osseous Defects,” Journal of Periodontology 63:729-735 (1992). (7 pages).
Ohgushi, H. et al., “Marrow Cell Induced Osteogenesis in Porous Hydroxyapatite and Tricalcium Phosphate: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study of Ectopic Bone Formation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 24:1563-1570 (1990). (8 pages).
Ohura, K. et at., “Healing of Segmental Bone Defects in Rats Induced by a beta-TCP-MCPM Cement Combined with rhBMP-2,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 44:168-175 (1999). (7 pages).
Soriano, I. et at., “Formulation of Calcium Phosphates/Poly (d,l-lactide) Blends Containing Gentamicin for Bone Implantation,” Journal of Controlled Release 68:121-134 (2000). (14 pages).
Tancred, D.C. et at., “A Synthetic Bone Implant Macroscopically Identical to Cancellous Bone,” Biomaterials 19:2303-2311 (1998). (9 pages).
Thoma, K. et al., “Biodegradable Controlled Release Implants Based on beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Ceramic,” European Journal Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 38:107-112 (1992). (6 pages).
Uchida, A. et al., “The Use of Ceramics for Bone Replacement,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 66-B:269-275 (1984). (7 pages).
Uchida, A. et at., “Bone Ingrowth into Three Different Porous Ceramics Implanted into the Tibia of Rats and Rabbits,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 3:65-77 (1985). (13 pages).
Vaccaro, A.R., “The Role of the Osteoconductive Scaffold in Synthetic Bone Graft,” Orthopedics 25(5):571-578 (2002). (8 pages).
W. Schneiders et al., “Effect of modification of hydroxyapatite-collagen composites with sodium citrate, phosphoserine, phosphoserine-RGD-peptide and calcium carbonate on bone remodelling,” Bone 40 (2007) pp. 1048-1059, Elsevier, Nov. 19, 2006, Dresden, Germany, ww.elsevier.com-locate-bone.
White, E. et al., “Biomaterial Aspects of Interpore-200 Porous Hydroxyapatite,” Dental Clinics of North America 30 (1):49-67 (1986). (19 pages).
Zheng, Q. et al. “Artificial bone of Porous Tricalcium Phosphate Ceramics and Its Preliminary Clinical Application,” Journal of Tongji Medical University, vol. 12, pp. 173-178 (1992) (6 pages).
Frayssinet, P. and Rouquet, N. “High Compressive Strength Macroporous Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Repair,” Journal of Biomechanics (1998) 31 (Supp1): 50-50.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180250432 A1 Sep 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61333478 May 2010 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14980022 Dec 2015 US
Child 15873381 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13104716 May 2011 US
Child 14980022 US