Printing devices, such as thermal ink jet printers, may include orifice plates including multiple orifices therein. A determination of orifice health, i.e., if an individual orifice is occluded, and if so, to what extent, and whether or not the ejection device of the individual orifice is functioning, may be periodically determined so as to schedule orifice plate maintenance and/or to compensate for the occluded orifice by use of another orifice during printing. Testing individual ones of the multiple orifices sequentially may be time consuming and may utilize expensive equipment.
Printing device 10 may include an ink ejection array 14, such as an orifice plate 16. In the embodiment shown, orifice plate 16 includes multiple die 18, wherein each of die 18 includes multiple individual orifices 20 (several example orifices are shown on example die 18a), wherein the individual orifices 20 are each configured to sequentially eject a fluid droplet, such as an ink droplet 22, therefrom (one example ink droplet 22 is shown as ejected from an orifice 20 on a die 18b).
The group of individual die 18 of array 14 may collectively define set of orifices 20 that may extend completely across a width 24 of a printzone 26. A sheet of print media (not shown in this figure) may move past array 14 along an axis 28 that is perpendicular to width 24, such that array 14 may be referred to as a page wide printing array. In other words, die 18 of the embodiment shown, including orifices 20, are not moved along a direction parallel to width 24 as which may be the case in a printer including a movable carriage mounted printhead. Accordingly, in the embodiment shown, array 14 may also be referred to as a fixed or a stationary printing array 14 because die 18 remain stationary in their position with respect to axis 28 and along width 24. (In another embodiment shown in
Page wide arrays differ from traditional movable print carriage printing systems. In particular, page wide arrays may not provide for manifold nozzle redundancy of scanning printing head engines, i.e., each nozzle of a page wide array may be the sole ink printing orifice for a particular region of a page and, therefore, print quality may be degraded by occlusion of a single orifice. Print quality may be enhanced by a precise knowledge of the health of each nozzle before starting printing of an image. Knowledge of an occluded or otherwise unhealthy print nozzle orifice in a page wide array may enable the writing system of the printer to apply a limited nozzle substitution so as to provide a high quality printed image.
Page wide array products are not available in consumer and commercial printing markets because of the high complexity and stringent requirements of the writing system to support a high quality, ink printing page wide array that includes a nozzle health drop detector. However, because of the potential high productivity of such page wide arrays, the low noise generated by such page wide arrays, and the small form factors of page wide arrays, it may be desirable to provide a low cost page wide array printer for all printing market segments from consumer/office printers to digital presses. Providing a low cost page wide array printer may be feasible if a low cost drop detection device can be formulated for use in a page wide array printer.
Use of drop detectors has not heretofore been utilized in page wide printing arrays because of lack of experience, high complexity, high cost, and difficulties of scalability, i.e., providing a drop detector for the entire page wide array. Typically, drop detectors developed for traditional small and scanning printers are not scalable to page wide arrays because traditional drop detectors do not have a wide angle field of view. In particular, if the detector utilized is an electrostatic detector, such a page wide electrostatic detector would have a prohibitively large cost because of the noble metal coatings used on the detector. Moreover, if an electrostatic detector is utilized in a page wide array, such a detector would have an increased electrode area and would correspondingly increase the noise floor detection system utilized. Moreover, such large electrostatic detectors would not function reliably and therefore would be useless for page wide array applications. Accordingly, classical scanning drop detectors used in upscaled products are not reliable, are very slow, and do not meet the expectations of cost and performance. In other words, a page wide array electrostatic drop detector would have a huge footprint, which is a challenge for traditionally functioning electrostatic drop detectors.
In contrast, the light scattering optical system of the present invention is very scalable, has no moving parts for the optical detector which renders the detector more reliable, which is important for large page wide array printers. Additionally, light pipes utilized in the light scattering optical system of the present invention are scalable for page wide arrays with little cost increase. Accordingly, the light scattering optical system of the present invention will be hereinafter described in more detail.
In printers including page wide arrays 14, each of the individual orifices 20 may be solely responsible for printing ink within its own individual region within width 24 of printzone 26, such as a region 24a (shown large for ease of illustration) in which ink droplet 22 is shown. Accordingly, if a particular orifice 20, also referred to as a nozzle, is fully or even partially occluded, the finished printed product may include an unprinted line extending along a length of the printed print media in a line parallel to axis 28 and across a width of the orifice region 24a, for example. Accordingly, determining the health of each of the individual orifices 20 of array 14, i.e., whether or not the individual orifice 20 is occluded and if so to what extent, and if the ink ejection mechanism of the individual orifice is functioning, in such page wide arrays 14 may allow corrective measures to be taken to reduce or eliminate unprinted regions in the finished printed product. For example, if a particular orifice 20 is found by the printing orifice health detection device 12 to be occluded or the ejection device for the particular orifice is not functioning, servicing of the array 14 may be conducted, or adjacent orifices may be activated to eject ink therefrom to compensate for the non-functioning orifice.
Health detection device 12 may include a light source 30, such as a collimated light source, and more particularly, a laser light source, that may produce a light beam 32 that is projected across orifice plate 16. Any shape of light beam 32 may be utilized. A rectangular cross sectional shape of light beam 32 is shown in the embodiments illustrated for ease of illustration. Light source 30 may be connected to a controller, such as a printed circuit board 31 on which the light source may be positioned. Light beam 32 may be projected such that ink droplets 22 that are ejected from array 14 will pass through light beam 32 enroute to a servicing station or a sheet of print media, for example (not shown in this figure). As the ink droplets 22 pass through light beam 32, light is scattered from ink droplets 22 to produce scattered light 34.
Scattered light 34 may be directed as scattered light 34a directly toward a light detection device 36, or as scattered light 34b toward a light guide device 38, which is then projected to light detection device 36 by light guide device 38. In this embodiment, light guide device 38 ay be a reflector, such as a mirror. Light detection device 36 may be a contact image sensor (CIS), which in one embodiment may be a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) line array as shown in this figure, or may be a photo diode (shown in
Controller 31 may receive light scattering information detected by light detection device 36 and may utilize the light scattering information to determine a health of an orifice 20 that ejected a particular ejected ink drop 22 that corresponds to the light scattering information detected by light detection device 36.
In other embodiments, other shapes, locations, angles, and the like of the components, or other components, of the system may be utilized for the determination of orifice health.
Other variations and modifications of the concepts described herein may be utilized and fall within the scope of the claims below.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/079,338, filed on Mar. 25, 2008, entitled A DROP DETECTION MECHANISM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF, and hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4422719 | Orcutt | Dec 1983 | A |
5304814 | Markham | Apr 1994 | A |
5428218 | Toughlian et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5589858 | Kadowaki et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5621524 | Mitani | Apr 1997 | A |
5742303 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774141 | Cooper et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5856833 | Elgee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5896145 | Osborne et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6088134 | Schmidt | Jul 2000 | A |
6168258 | Lou et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6299275 | Elgee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6513900 | Endo et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517184 | Bruch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525863 | Riza | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6565179 | Bruch | May 2003 | B1 |
6585349 | Lou et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6648444 | Valero | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6747684 | Ornellas et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767122 | Honguh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769756 | Su | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786626 | Wu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802580 | Valero | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814422 | Bruch | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851816 | Wu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877838 | Elgee | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6935717 | Su | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6966664 | Wu | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969159 | Su | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984013 | Arqullevich et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7055925 | Subirada et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7125151 | Uemura et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140762 | Wu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7249830 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267467 | Wu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7287824 | Subirada | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287833 | Howard | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7364276 | Piatt et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7434919 | Hawkins | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442180 | Vitello | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452053 | Valles et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7490918 | Nagashima | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513616 | Lin | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7832822 | Kiyama et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010019480 | Fujino et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030193608 | Yen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050024410 | Subirada et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050253890 | Nagashima | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060103691 | Dietl et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120098 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139392 | Fernandez et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060187651 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060279601 | Unosawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024658 | Diol et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030300 | Jeong | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070064068 | Piatt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080180471 | Han | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080246803 | Barger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090091595 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090141057 | Hayashi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090179934 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090244163 | Govyadinov | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273620 | Govyadinov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310206 | Gluckstad | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100207989 | Govyadinov | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110090275 | Govyadinov et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001113725 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2005083769 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006047235 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006346906 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007119971 | May 2007 | JP |
2007015808 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2009120436 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090244141 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12079338 | Mar 2008 | US |
Child | 12381873 | US |