This disclosure relates to implementations of an orifice plate configured to regulate a fluid flow. In particular, the present disclosure is directed to implementations of an orifice plate comprising a plurality of holes positioned to form one or more spiral arrangements.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,765, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses an orifice plate for use in a conduit through which fluid flows.
As disclosed in the '765 patent, in general, the variation of a process variable across an orifice plate's surface introduces inefficiencies in a fluid flow. For example, prior art orifice plates generally experience fairly large pressure losses as a fluid flows from one side of the plate to the other. Unfortunately, to handle such large pressure losses, larger and more expensive fluid pumps are used. Also, pressure potential in prior art orifice plates is generally consumed by eddy turbulence that is random and chaotic. These eddy formations about the orifice plate reduce linearity and repeatability of any process variable measurements, thereby causing a reduction in measurement accuracy. Reduced measurement accuracy leads to processes that are highly variable which, in turn, increases process costs due to greater equipment operational margins that must be maintained. If pressure can be equalized or balanced across the surface area of an orifice plate, the random and chaotic eddy formations may be greatly reduced. Thus, by balancing the flow with respect to the measured process variable, the accuracy of process variable measurement may be improved and the cost of taking such measurements may be reduced.
An orifice plate according to the '765 patent addresses these issues. More particularly, an orifice plate according to the '765 patent may balance one or more process variables associated with a fluid flow passing through the orifice plate. Thus, an orifice plate according to the '765 patent may improve repeatability, linearity, and reduction of pressure loss.
However, the '765 patent does not teach how to construct an orifice plate configured to limit pipe and plate noise, erosion, cavitation, shear stress, etc. while maximizing system pressure loss, and limiting flow to required values. Further, the '765 patent does not teach how to manufacture an orifice plate configured to optimize process variable measurements, minimize system pressure drop, recover pressure, recover energy, and reduce noise and other inefficiencies within a system using an orifice plate comprising a plurality of holes positioned to form one or more spiral layouts. Each spiral layout consisting of a series of holes arranged to form a spiral.
Accordingly, it can be seen that needs exist for the orifice plates disclosed herein. It is to the provision of one or more orifice plates configured to address these needs, and others, that the present invention is primarily directed.
Implementations of an orifice plate configured to regulate a fluid flow are provided. An orifice plate is configured to be positioned in a conduit and extend across a transverse cross-section thereof. The orifice plate comprises a plurality of holes that extend therethrough. The plurality of holes are arranged to form a spiral layout configured to regulate a fluid flow passing therethrough. The spiral layout is a logarithmic spiral. In some implementations, the spiral layout has a growth factor of substantially 1.618 for each quarter turn.
Another example orifice plate comprises a plurality of holes arranged to form three or more spiral layouts. Each spiral layout is a logarithmic spiral. In some implementations, each spiral layout has a growth factor of substantially 1.618 for each quarter turn.
Each hole of an office plate includes an inlet and an outlet. In some implementations, each hole has a contoured conical shape extending between an inlet and an outlet, the inlet is larger in diameter than the outlet. Each hole has a linear radius having a constant growth factor. In some implementations, the linear radius has a constant growth factor of substantially 1.618.
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Implementations of an orifice plate configured to regulate a fluid flow are provided. As used herein, the term “orifice plate” refers to any structural element (e.g., a plate, a disk, etc.) having a hole pattern formed therethrough that is adapted to be installed in a fluid flow such that the fluid passes through the orifice plate's hole pattern. The hole pattern of an orifice plate, according to the present disclosure, comprises a plurality of holes arranged to form one or more spiral layouts. The hole pattern of an orifice plate can be configured to, for example, improve process variable measurement(s), minimize system pressure drop, maximize system pressure drop, recover pressure, recover energy, reduce noise and other inefficiencies within the system, or a combination thereof. In this way, as non-limiting examples, an orifice plate can be configured for use as a restriction orifice plate, a flow conditioning plate, a flow measurement plate, a flow silencing plate, or a suitable combination thereof.
An orifice plate according to the present invention can be secured between two flanges of a conduit (e.g., a pipe). In this way, the orifice plate secured between the flanges can be used to regulate (e.g., condition) the fluid flow passing through the conduit. Such conduits, and the joining thereof, are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and are not limitations of the present invention.
An orifice plate can be sized and/or shaped to work with any size and/or shape of conduit. For example, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As described above in connection with the hole 110 shown in
It should be understood that, in some implementations, an orifice plate may have a plurality of holes therein that are arranged into more than three spiral layouts 322, 324, 326. In general, the number of holes in an orifice plate, the number of spiral layouts, and the distribution of holes forming each spiral layout depends on how a flow profile needs to look after it exits (or passes through) the orifice plate. If an orifice plate is to be manufactured with more than three spiral layouts, the number of spiral layouts may be a Fibonacci number (e.g., 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, etc.).
An orifice plate Beta Ratio (β) is the ratio of the combined inside diameters (d) of the holes (e.g., holes 110, 310, 410) in an orifice plate (e.g., orifice plates 100, 300, 400) to the inside diameter of a conduit (D) (i.e., β=d/D). Typically, the orifice plate Beta Ratio (β) ranges between 0.05 to 0.95. In some implementations, an orifice plate's (e.g., orifice plate 100, 300, 400) efficiency is limited by the orifice plate Beta Ratio (β). Thus, when an orifice plate is being fabricated, the hole layout may be tied to a desired orifice plate Beta Ratio (β). Or, put another way, a desired orifice plate Beta Ratio (β) may be used to determine the number and diameter of the holes put in an orifice plate. A desired orifice plate Beta Ratio (β) being a function of end use (i.e., the conduit in which the orifice plate is to be positioned and the fluid flow it is being configured to regulate). Therefore, in some implementations, it may be desirable to configure an orifice plate to maximize the Beta Ratio (β) (see, e.g., the orifice plate 400 shown
As an example, the spacing between the spiral layouts 322, 324, 326 shown in
When an orifice plate is being configured (or adapted) for use with a particular conduit and fluid flow, the desired Beta Ratio (β) and the inside diameter (D) of the conduit may be used to calculate a combined hole diameter (d). This value (d) is equal, or substantially equal, to the sum of the diameters of the holes that should be placed in the orifice plate. A person of ordinary skill in the art, having the benefit of the present disclosure, could use this value (d) to position a plurality of holes, having a combined inside diameter equal to (d), in an orifice plate to form one or more spiral arrangements as described above.
As shown in
In some implementations, knife edge 550 inlet and/or outlet shapes have a high k (>1). In some implementations, blunt/square edge 554 inlet and/or outlet shapes have a moderate to high k. In some implementations, tapered/beveled edge 556 inlet and/or outlet shapes have a moderate to low k. In some implementations, contoured 552 inlet and/or outlet shapes may have a low to very low k (<<1). As would be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, as “k” increases, permanent pressure loss in the system increases.
Orifice plate 100, 300, 400 inlet and/or outlet shapes can affect pressure loss, noise, erosion, cavitation, accuracy of process variable measurement, etc. In some implementations, low k value shapes are preferred for measurement, and high k value shapes are preferred for restriction orifice plates. In some implementations, for systems requiring low noise, cavitation, erosion, etc., moderate k value shapes are preferred.
In some implementations, an orifice plate 100, 300, 400 constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure may accommodate bi-directional flow within a conduit, pipe, etc. Special calibrations and correction factors may be required to meet specifications. In some implementations, the holes of an orifice plate optimized for bi-directional flow may have bi-directional contoured edges (see, e.g.,
Reference throughout this specification to “an embodiment” or “implementation” or words of similar import means that a particular described feature, structure, or characteristic is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the phrase “in some implementations” or a phrase of similar import in various places throughout this specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings.
The described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the above description, numerous specific details are provided for a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that embodiments of the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations may not be shown or described in detail.
While operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2169359 | Jones | Aug 1939 | A |
2390320 | Overbeke | Dec 1945 | A |
2688985 | Holdenried | Sep 1954 | A |
2825203 | Bertin | Mar 1958 | A |
3545492 | Scheid, Jr. | Dec 1970 | A |
3702144 | Loveland | Nov 1972 | A |
3878870 | Atherton et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4130173 | Cooksey | Dec 1978 | A |
5341848 | Laws | Aug 1994 | A |
5495872 | Gallagher | Mar 1996 | A |
5918637 | Flelschman | Jul 1999 | A |
7051765 | Kelley et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7621670 | England | Nov 2009 | B1 |
8245727 | Mooney | Aug 2012 | B2 |
9200650 | Van Buskirk | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9410565 | Van Buskirk | Aug 2016 | B2 |
10378566 | Kumar | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20060278289 | Robinson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20100071793 | Warnica | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20140096854 | Harman | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150083262 | Van Buskirk | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160076565 | Van Buskirk | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20180295800 | Kiernan | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20200080576 | Whynall | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
653MUMNP2010 | Aug 2010 | IN |
2015048043 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Paul D. Van Buskirk, “Thermodynamic and Transport Analyses of a Bernoulli Flow Meter system for Any Real Fluid”, [dated Apr. 2006], [retrieved on Nov. 23, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.aplusflowtek.com/_papers/PTK-8-3_R1.pdf>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210285472 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |