It should be noted that this application claims priority based on Japan Patent Application No. JP 2013-032544 filed on Feb. 21, 2013 and the disclosure thereof is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to an ornithopter.
A small unmanned air vehicle (UAV) has been developed. Such a UAV at the present moment is mainly a fixed wing type or a rotary wing type. However, as a future UAV form, development of “flapping type” which imitates birds or insects is initiated. The flapping type UAV has characteristics of both the fixed wing type and the rotary wing type, and is expected from the viewpoint of quietness, low visibility, mimetic characteristics, etc. Such a flapping type UAV is hereinafter referred to as an “ornithopter”.
Patent Literature 1 (Japan Patent No. 4,675,346) discloses an example of the ornithopter. This ornithopter includes a main body, and a pair of wings attached to the main body. One of the pair of wings is attached to a left side portion of the main body, and the other of the pair of wings is attached to a right side portion of the main body. Each wing is a single piece wing. The ornithopter floats in the air by a flapping motion of the pair of the single piece wings.
The ornithopter disclosed in Patent Literature 1 uses a single piece wing. In the case of the single piece wing, a wrist portion does not exist. Therefore, there are problems such as degradation of mimetic characteristics, increase of thrust loss and increase of drag.
Patent Literature 1: Japan Patent No. 4,675,346
An object of the present invention is to provide an ornithopter having high mimetic characteristics, and which can suppress thrust loss and increase of drag.
In one aspect of the present invention, an ornithopter is provided. The ornithopter includes a main wing mounted on a fuselage, and a control system which controls a flapping motion of the main wing. The main wing includes: an inner spar extending outwardly from the fuselage; an outer spar extending outwardly from the inner spar; and a wrist portion disposed between the inner spar and the outer spar, and which varies a bending angle, which is a relative angle between the inner spar and the outer spar, within a predetermined angle range. The control system includes: an actuator which realizes a raising motion of the inner spar by moving the inner spar in an upward direction and a lowering motion of the inner spar by moving the inner spar in a downward direction; an angle sensor mounted in the wrist portion, and which measures the bending angle; and a control unit which controls the actuator to move the inner spar in response to the measured bending angle of the angle sensor.
According to the present invention, an ornithopter having high mimetic characteristics and which can suppress thrust loss and increase of drag is realized.
Referring to the drawings, an ornithopter according to some embodiments will be explained.
As shown in
The main wing 10 includes a main spar 20 as a frame. The main spar 20 is disposed to extend outwardly (toward a direction away from the fuselage 2) from the shoulder portion of the fuselage 2. More specifically, the main spar 20 has an inner spar 21 and an outer spar 22. The inner spar 21 is a portion, which is provided in the inner wing portion 11, of the main spar 20, and is disposed to extend outwardly from the shoulder portion of the fuselage 2. On the other hand, the outer spar 22 is a portion, which is provided in the outer wing portion 12, of the main spar 20, and is disposed to extend further outwardly than the inner spar 21.
The main wing 10 further includes a wrist portion 30 disposed between the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22. That is, the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22 are connected to each other via the wrist portion 30. The wrist portion 30 is a movable portion, and the main spar 20 is bendable at this wrist portion 30. A configuration example of the wrist portion 30 will be explained later.
A fuselage-side end portion (a root portion) of the inner spar 21 is connected to an actuator 120 provided on the shoulder portion of the fuselage 2. This actuator 120 moves the inner spar 21 in an upward direction or a downward direction in a rotational and reciprocating manner around the shoulder portion of the fuselage 2 as a center of rotation or around a straight line parallel to the X-axis as a rotation axis. Thereby, a “lowering motion” and a “raising motion” of the inner spar 21 (i.e. the main wing 10) are realized.
Next, referring to
The inner spar 21 rotates around the shoulder portion of the fuselage 2, which is the center of rotation, or around the straight line parallel to the X-axis, which is the rotation axis. Its rotational angle is hereinafter referred to as a “flapping angle θ”. As the inner spar 21 rotates in the “+Z-direction” (the upward direction), the flapping angle θ increases. On the other hand, as the inner spar 21 rotates in the “−Z-direction” (the downward direction), the flapping angle θ decreases.
A variation range RA of the flapping angle θ is predetermined, and an upper limit and a lower limit of the predetermined variation range RA are θH and θL, respectively. That is, the flapping angle θ varies within the predetermined variation range RA defined by the upper limit angle θH and the lower limit angle θL. When the flapping angle θ is the upper limit angle θH, the inner spar 21 is located at the top position (+Z-direction side). On the other hand, when the flapping angle θ is the lower limit angle θL, the inner spar 21 is located at the bottom position (−Z-direction side).
It is the above mentioned actuator 120 that varies the flapping angle θ of the inner spar 21. The actuator 120 moves the inner spar 21 in the upward direction or in the downward direction in the rotational and reciprocating manner, and varies the flapping angle θ within the predetermined variation range RA. A motion of rotating the inner spar 21 in the downward direction, that is, a motion of decreasing the flapping angle θ toward the lower limit angle θL corresponds to the “lowering motion”. On the other hand, a motion of rotating the inner spar 21 in the upward direction, that is, a motion of increasing the flapping angle θ toward the upper limit angle θH corresponds to the “raising motion”.
The outer spar 22 connected to the inner spar 21 via the wrist portion 30 relatively moves with respect to the inner spar 21. The relative angle between the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22 is hereinafter referred to as a “bending angle φ”.
Here, in order to facilitate the explanation of the bending angle φ, a relative coordinate system in which the inner spar 21 is used as a reference is defined. As shown in
The outer spar 22 rotates around the wrist portion 30 as a center of rotation, or around a straight line parallel to the X-axis as the rotation axis. Its rotational angle is the above mentioned “bending angle φ”. As the outer spar 22 rotates in the +T-direction (the upward direction), the bending angle φ increases. On the other hand, as the outer spar 22 rotates in the −T-direction (the downward direction), the bending angle φ decreases.
A variation range RB of the bending angle φ is predetermined, and an upper limit and a lower limit of the predetermined variation range RB are φH and φL, respectively. That is, the bending angle φ varies within the predetermined variation range RB defined by the upper limit angle φH and the lower limit angle φL. When the bending angle φ is the upper limit angle φH, the outer spar 22 is located at the top position (+T-direction side). Typically, when the bending angle φ is the upper limit angle φH, the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22 are forming a straight line. That is, an extending direction of the outer spar 22 coincides with the S-direction. However, embodiments are not limited to the above mentioned example. On the other hand, when the bending angle φ is the lower limit angle φL, the outer spar 22 is located at the bottom position (−T-direction side).
In the present embodiment, unlike the case of the inner spar 21 described above, an actuator is not provided with respect to the outer spar 22. That is, in the wrist portion 30, the actuator for directly and mechanically moving the outer spar 22 is not provided. As will be explained later in detail, the outer spar 22 follows the lowering motion and the raising motion of the inner spar 21, and is moved only in a “passive” manner.
The wrist portion 30 is configured such that the bending angle φ of the outer spar 22 varies within the predetermined variable range RB.
As shown in
Further, in the wrist portion 30, an angle sensor 130 for measuring the bending angle φ is provided. In the example shown in
Next, referring to
In addition, in the present embodiment, the rib 25 has an S-shaped camber (an inverted camber). The rib rear portion 25R is curved upward. Referring to
Note that, in the present embodiment, an actuator is not provided for the rib 25. In other words, an actuator for directly and mechanically moving the rib 25 is not provided. As described above, the rib 25 has the S-shaped camber, and is automatically tilted (twisted) from the X-direction during the lowering motion of the main wing 10.
The ornithopter 1 according to the present embodiment has a control system 100 for controlling a flapping motion of the main wing 10.
As described above, the actuator 120 is a mechanical mechanism for moving the inner spar 21. The actuator 120 rotates the inner spar 21 in the upward direction or the downward direction, and thereby the raising motion or the lowering motion is realized.
As described above, the angle sensor 130 is provided in the wrist portion 30, and measures the bending angle φ of the outer spar 22. Then, the angle sensor 130 transmits bending angle data DB indicating the measured bending angle φ to the control unit 110 in a real-time manner.
The angle sensor 140 is provided with the actuator 120, and measures the flapping angle θ of the inner spar 21. Then, the angle sensor 140 transmits flapping angle data DA indicating the measured flapping angle θ to the control unit 110 in a real-time manner. Note that the angle sensor 140 is not necessarily required.
The control unit 110 is a computer that is mounted inside the fuselage 2. The control unit 110 controls the raising motion and the lowering motion of the inner spar 21 by controlling the actuator 120. More specifically, the control unit 110 receives the flapping angle data DA and the bending angle data DB, and monitors the flapping angle θ and the bending angle φ in a real-time manner. Then, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 and moves the inner spar 21 in response to at least the bending angle φ. A controlled object by the control unit 110 is, for example, a timing of the raising motion and the lowering motion.
Next, an example of control for the lowering motion and the raising motion will be explained.
3-1. Lowering Motion
<State S1>
The state S1 is a state in which both the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22 are at the top position. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is the upper limit angle θH, and the bending angle φ is the upper limit angle φH. In this state S1, the lowering motion is started. Specifically, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 to initiate the lowering motion of the inner spar 21.
<State S2>
The state S2 is a state in which the inner spar 21 is being lowered by the actuator 120. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is an intermediate angle θM (θH>θM>θL). The outer spar 22 is passively moved in the downward direction by following the lowering motion of the inner spar 21, while the bending angle φ is remained in the upper limit angle φH.
Further, as explained with reference to
<State S3>
The state S3 is a state in which the inner spar 21 is at the bottom position. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is the lower limit angle L. The motion of the inner spar 21 is stopped in this moment, while the outer spar 22, which was following the inner spar 21, continues to move by the inertia. That is, the outer spar 22 naturally moves by the momentum of the lowering motion of the inner spar 21 even if the actuator is not provided with the outer spar.
<State S4>
The state S4 is a state in which only the outer spar 22 moves, while the inner spar 21 is at the bottom position. In this moment, the bending angle φ is an intermediate angle θM (φH>φM>φL). Note that, in this moment, the actuator 120 fixes the inner spar 21, and keeps the flapping angle θ at the lower limit angle θL.
<State S5>
The state S5 is a state in which both the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22 are at the bottom position. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is the lower limit angle θL, and the bending angle φ is the lower limit angle φL. When the control unit 110, which monitors the flapping angle θ and the bending angle φ in the real-time manner using the angle sensors 130 and 140, detects this state S5, subsequent raising control (see state S6) is initiated. That is, when the state in which the bending angle φ becomes the lower limit angle θL is detected after the lowering motion of the inner spar 21, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 to initiate the raising motion of the inner spar 21.
3-2. Raising Motion
<State S6>
The state S6 is the same as the above mentioned state S5. In this state S6, the fixation of the inner spar 21 is released, and the raising motion is initiated. Specifically, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 to start the raising motion of the inner spar 21.
<State S7>
The state S7 is a state in which the inner spar 21 is being raised by the actuator 120. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is an intermediate angle θM (θH>θM>θL). The outer spar 22 is passively moved in the upward direction by following the raising motion of the inner spar 21, while the bending angle φ is remained in the lower limit angle φL.
<State S8>
The state S8 is a state in which the inner spar 21 is at the top position. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is the upper limit angle θH. The motion of the inner spar 21 is stopped in this moment, while the outer spar 22, which was following the inner spar 21, continues to move by the inertia. That is, the outer spar 22 naturally moves by the momentum of the raising motion of the inner spar 21 even if the actuator is not provided with the outer spar.
<State S9>
The state S9 is a state in which only the outer spar 22 moves, while the inner spar 21 is at the top position. In this moment, the bending angle φ is an intermediate angle φM (φH>φM>φL). Note that, in this moment, the actuator 120 fixes the inner spar 21, and keeps the flapping angle θ at the upper limit angle θH.
<State S10>
The state S10 is a state in which both the inner spar 21 and the outer spar 22 are at the top position. In this moment, the flapping angle θ is the upper limit angle θH, and the bending angle φ is the upper limit angle φH. When the control unit 110, which monitors the flapping angle θ and the bending angle φ in the real-time manner using the angle sensors 130 and 140, detects this state S10, above mentioned lowering control (see state S1) is initiated. That is, when the state in which the bending angle φ becomes the upper limit angle φH is detected after the raising motion of the inner spar 21, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 to initiate the lowering motion of the inner spar 21.
Note that in the raising motion, there exists a possibility that the main wing 10 is automatically raised by aerodynamic force. In such a case, it is not necessary to actively move the inner spar 21 using the actuator 120. In this case, in the state S6, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 to only release the fixation of the inner spar 21.
By repeating the lowering motion and the raising motion described above, the flapping motion of the ornithopter 1 according to the present embodiment is realized.
According to the present embodiment, the main wing 10 of ornithopter 1 includes the mimicked wrist portion 30 configured to be bendable. Therefore, mimetic characteristics are improved and the thrust loss and the increase of the drag are suppressed as compared to the case in which the single piece wing is used.
Furthermore, according to the present embodiment, the following effects can be obtained. To illustrate the effects, firstly, following comparative example will be considered.
In the comparative example, in the wrist portion 30, an actuator (motor, link mechanism etc.) for directly and mechanically moving the outer spar 22 is provided. Then, in addition to the inner spar 21, the outer spar 22 is forcibly moved using the actuator. Furthermore, an actuator is also provided for the rib 25, and by forcibly inclining the rib 25, the wing plane L is tilted from the X-direction. Motion states (motion timing, motion frequency, motion speed) of the inner spar 21, the outer spar 22 and the rib 25 using the actuators are appropriately set, respectively.
In the case of such a comparative example, the following problems exist. Firstly, since extra actuators and wiring are necessary, weight will be increased and constitution will be complicated. Moreover, since the way of forcibly moving the outer spar 22 or the rib 25 is different from a mechanism in a natural bird, the mimetic characteristics are deteriorated.
In addition, in case that the lowering motion is initiated before the outer spar 22 reaches the top position (before the bending angle φ becomes the upper limit angle φH) or the raising motion is initiated before the outer spar 22 reaches the bottom position (before the bending angle φ becomes the lower limit angle φL), problems such as thrust loss, drag increase and deterioration of mimetic characteristics occur. In order to prevent such problems, motions of the inner spar 21, the outer spar 22 and the rib 25, respectively should be appropriately controlled. However, appropriate motion states (motion timing, motion frequency, motion speed) vary greatly depending on the environment such as flight speed etc. Therefore, it is necessary that the motion states of the inner spar 21, the outer spar 22 and the rib 25, respectively are controlled dynamically in response to the variation of the environment such as flight speed. However, such a dynamical control is very difficult. That is, the comparative example has poor adaptability to the environment.
On the contrary to such a comparative example, in the present embodiment, the actuator for directly and mechanically moving the outer spar 22 is not provided in the wrist portion 30. The outer spar 22 only passively moves by following the lowering motion and the raising motion of the inner spar 21. As explained with reference to
Further, the actuator is not provided with respect to the rib 25. That is, the actuator for directly and mechanically moving the rib 25 is not provided. As explained with reference to
Thus, since it is not necessary to provide extra actuators with respect to the outer spar 22 or the rib 25, it is possible to reduce the weight and simplify the mechanism. In addition, since the outer spar 22 or the rib 25 is not forcibly moved, the mimetic characteristics are improved and the thrust loss and the increase of the drag are suppressed.
Furthermore, according to the present embodiment, the angle sensor 130 for measuring the bending angle φ of the outer spar 22 is provided in the wrist portion 30. Then, the control unit 110 controls the actuator 120 to move the inner spar 21 in response to the measured bending angle φ by the angle sensor 130. As a result, as shown in
As described above, according to the present embodiment, the outer spar 22 passively moves by following the lowering motion and the raising motion of the inner spar 21. However, there exists a possibility that, the motion of the outer spar 22 becomes a jittery motion in case of using the above mentioned configuration itself. Therefore, as shown in
In the example of control explained with reference to
As described above, some embodiments of the present invention has been explained with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the above mentioned embodiments, and may be appropriately modified by the person having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-032544 | Feb 2013 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2014/053924 | 2/19/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/129502 | 8/28/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1428559 | Rilleau | Sep 1922 | A |
1450480 | Buck | Apr 1923 | A |
1485163 | Braun | Feb 1924 | A |
1679356 | Grunewald | Aug 1928 | A |
2757886 | Correa | Aug 1956 | A |
4417707 | Leong | Nov 1983 | A |
4863117 | Riout | Sep 1989 | A |
5170965 | Yasuda | Dec 1992 | A |
5288039 | DeLaurier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
6250585 | Pell | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6659397 | Charron | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6802473 | Charron | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6840477 | Hamamoto | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7007889 | Charron | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7255305 | Earl et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7607610 | Sterchak | Oct 2009 | B1 |
9216823 | Matte | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20040227035 | Hubbard | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060102782 | Earl et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070158495 | Hubbard | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20120248243 | Greenyer | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20150210389 | Murdock | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150353193 | Kuroda | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160009389 | Kuroda et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
111918 | Feb 1926 | CH |
348326 | Aug 1960 | CH |
1118385 | Aug 2003 | CN |
568062 | Jan 1933 | DE |
701 691 | Jan 1941 | DE |
3537365 | Apr 1987 | DE |
36 42 640 | Jun 1988 | DE |
101 37 623 | Feb 2003 | DE |
2 935 681 | Mar 2010 | FR |
2 400 089 | Oct 2004 | GB |
3116172 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2008-24049 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009-90770 | Apr 2009 | JP |
4675346 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2011-195050 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2013-514232 | Apr 2013 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Sep. 3, 2015 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/JP2014/053924. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Aug. 27, 2015 in related International Application No. PCT/JP2014/053927. |
International Search Report issued May 27, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/JP2014/053924. |
International Search Report issued May 27, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/JP2014/053927. |
Festo AG & Co. KG, “Aerodynamic lightweight design with active torsion”, [online], Updated date unknown, Dispatch Date of Search report Jan. 6, 2015,Search on Jan. 7, 2015, Internet<http://www.festo.com/net/SupportPortal/Files/46270/Brosch—SmartBird—en—8s—RZ—110311—1o.pdf>. |
Erich von Holst et al., “How Ornithopters Fly”, [online], Updated date unknown, Dispatch Date of Search report Jan. 6, 2015, Search on Jan. 7, Internet<http://www.ornithopter.de/english/wings.htm>. |
Extended European Search Report issued Dec. 23, 2015 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 14754687.3. |
Extended European Search Report issued Dec. 14, 2015 in related European Patent Application No. 14754397.9. |
Decision to Grant a Patent issued Jul. 26, 2016 in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2013-032544 (with English translation). |
Office Action issued Oct. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/759,309. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Feb. 22, 2017 in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2013-032535 (with English translation). |
“SmartBird-Festo”, Aug. 21, 2012, [online], <URL:http://beamforbid.blogspot.jp/2012/08/smartbird-festo.html#!/2012/08/smartbird-festo.html>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160009389 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |