Patent Application
20210253291
The present invention concerns orodispersible self supporting films having quick dissolution time for therapeutic and food use.
Orodispersible self supporting films for releasing active ingredients for therapeutic or food use have been known for a long time and are available on the market.
These films disintegrate quickly in the mouth releasing the active ingredient.
Many of the films known at the state of the art use pullulan as the film forming component which is, however, an ingredient that is expensive and difficult to find.
It has thus been attempted to replace pullulan with less expensive ingredients that are, in any case, capable of maintaining the properties like their quick dissolution times, mouth freshness, marked aroma, and simplicity of preparation.
Chapdelaine et al. (WO 2003011259) described a film having quick dissolution times containing maltodextrin and hydrocolloids, in quantities that are greater than 10%, as film forming component. Hydrocolloids were necessary in order to facilitate the disintegration of the film but did not give the sensation of having a clean mouth since they tend to gel in contact with saliva.
Cilurzo et al. (US 2009/0017085) described self-supporting films for releasing active ingredients for therapeutic or food use based on maltodextrin and a plasticizer, totally without hydrocolloids. These films quickly disintegrated in the mouth and released the active ingredient in the oral cavity keeping the sensation of having a clean mouth that is indeed of pullulan-based films. Films composed by maltodextrin and plasticizers free from hydrocolloids had a drawback concerning their physical stability as they tended to become brittle over time and were not suitable to be handled during manufacturing process
Ibrahim et al. (US 2005/0281757) described a composition for delivery of an oral care substance to a dental surface upon application of the composition thereto. The composition was a flexible film comprising the oral care substance dispersed in a film-forming effective amount of a polymeric matrix having a hydrophilic component and a hydrophobic component in a weight ratio selected such that the film is substantially dissolvable in saliva in a period of time effective for delivery of the oral care substance [claim 1]. Adjusting the weight ratio of the more hydrophilic vinylpyrrolidone and the more hydrophobic vinylacetate monomers enables dissolution time to be controlled for optimum delivery of the oral care substance. The film described by Ibrahim were substantially dissolvable in saliva in about 5 to about 60 minutes [claim 13]. This dissolution time did not comply with specification of orodispersible films, since it is generally recognized that an orodispersible dosage form should disintegrate in less than 3 min as the PhEur states.
The aim of this work was the development of a film based on maltodextrin, a not expensive polymer, easy to find, free from hydrocolloids. These films were characterized by quick disintegration time (less then 3 minutes), and suitable mechanical properties in order to be handled during manufacturing process.
It has now been surprisingly found that it is possible to avoid brittleness of the films based on maltodextrin and plasticizer by incorporating, in the composition, a homopolymer or copolymer of vinyl acetate, preferably polyvinil acetate (PVA) or polyvinylpirrolidone vinyl acetate (PVP-VA).
The present invention concerns orodispersible self-supporting films without hydrocolloids comprising:
The polymers in general of vinyl acetate and in particular polyvinyl acetate are insoluble in water, the latter being used in many medicinal products, for example in pharmaceutical formulations with a prolonged release over time, or as a base in chewing gum.
The applications of PVP-VA rely mainly on its good binding properties, its affinity to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surface and its relatively low hygroscopicity. Because of these properties, PVP-VA is used as a binder in the production of granules and tablets by wet granulation, as a dry binder in direct compression, as a protective layer and subcoat for tablets cores, as a film forming agent in sprays and as a matrix.
The films, object of the present invention, have a quick dissolution time: addition of the more hydrophilic PVP-VA or the more hydrophobic PVA does not affect dissolution time of films.
The orodispersible films of the invention have disintegration times, evaluated in vitro and in vivo, that are lower than 3 minutes, they do not stick, they do not expand and are stable over time as far as the mechanical properties of elasticity and tensile strength are concerned, even when exposed to air.
The homopolymer or copolymer of vinyl acetate is in a quantity comprised between 1 and 20% by weight.
In particular the homopolymer of vinyl acetate (i.e. polyvinyl acetate—PVA) used in the invention has preferably an average molecular weight of between 5000 and 500000, more preferably between 250000 and 450000. A polyvinyl acetate that can be used in the invention is that sold with trademark Kollicoat® SR 30D commercialised by BASF.
The copolymer of vinyl acetate is preferably PVP-VA and a commercially material that can be used is Kollidon VA 64E with a ratio PVP: VA of 60:40.
Both polymers (PVA and PVP-VA 60:40) fulfil the monographs in the current versions of the European Pharmacopoeia, United States Pharmacopoeia and Japanese Pharmaceutical Excipients, and can be used for pharmaceutical product.
Preferably, the content of PVAc or PVP-VA in the film according to the present invention is between 2 and 10%, more preferably between 2.5 and 10%, even more preferably between 3 and 10%. According to a particularly preferred solutions the content of PVAc or PVP-VA in the film is between 3 and 6% or 3 and 5.5% by weight on the total weight of the the content of PVAc or PVP-VA in the film.
The maltodextrin used in the self-supporting film of the present invention has preferably a dextrose content, expressed in equivalents, that is less than 50, and more preferably is between 5 and 40.
The plasticizer used in the film of the present invention is preferably selected from the group consisting of water, polyalcohols, esters of citric acid, sebacic acid esters or mixtures thereof.
Particularly preferred are water, propylene glycol, glycerine, mannitol, sorbitol, maltitol and mixtures thereof.
The use of water as plasticizer is well known to the skilled in the art (Water Science Reviews, volume 3, Publisher: Cambridge University Press, Editors: Felix Franks, pp. 79-185).
The surfactant system used in the film of the present invention consists of one or more surfactants, preferably selected from the group consisting of sorbitan derivatives, sorbitol derivatives, esters of sucrose, fatty acid esters and their mixtures.
The active ingredient for food use is preferably an active ingredient with a breath freshening action and/or suitable for oral hygiene, preferably eugenol or menthol or a vegetal extract or an active ingredient of natural origin, suitable for nutritional supplementation, preferably mineral salts among those normally used for such a purpose or one or more vitamins.
The active ingredient for therapeutic use can be an ingredient with essentially topical action on the oral cavity selected from: antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral agents or disinfectants of the oral cavity; or it can be an ingredient with an essentially systemic action selected from the group of: anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipsychotic, hypnotic, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, antimigraine, antiparkinsonian, antiemetic, antihistaminic, beta blocker, anti-asthmatic anti-hypertensive, antitussive, laxative agents, inhibitors of type V phosphodiesterase , antikinetosis agents and hormones.
Active ingredients contained in such films are preferably selected from the group consisting of: Piroxicam, Ketoprofen, Diclofenac, Tramadol, Morphine, Nifedipine, Diazepam, Lorazepam, Alprazoiam, Bromazepam, Triazolam, Lormetazolam, Zolpidem, Paracetamol, Selegiline, Atenolol, Salbutamol, Sumatriptan, Clozapine, Ceterizine and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts.
A preferred active ingredient is an inhibitor of type V phosphodiesterase selected from sildenafil citrate and tadalafil or a hormone selected from progesterone and testosterone.
Moreover, the films according to the invention can possibly contain other excipients selected in the class of non-stick substances like for example colloidal silica or talc, sweeteners, flavourings, colorants, preservatives, buffer systems or mixtures thereof.
The films, object of the invention, can be manufactured with known processes, like those described in EP 1689374 by Cilurzo et al.
In particular, a process can be used comprising the steps of:
The polar solvent used in step i) is preferably selected from water, water-mixable solvents or relative mixtures. According to a particularly preferred solution it consists of water;
The polymer mixture used for preparing the films was obtained by solubilizing maltodextrin DE 6 in a suitable amount of water kept at T=80° C.
Subsequently The mixture was gradually cooled and glycerine, the surfactants, the homopolymer of vinyl acetate and the other components were added in the ratios indicated in Table 1. The system obtained is kept under stirring until all the components were dissolved.
The composition of the polymer mixtures used for preparing the film is shown in Table 1.
The preparation of the film was carried out using the Mathis Labcoater-Labdryer model LTE-S (M) (CH) according to a method that foresees coating the mixture on a protective silicone sheet. The operation conditions used are as follows:
The films thus prepared were separated by the protective sheet, cut with the desired dimensions and preserved in waterproof and lightproof packets.
The analysis of the tensile properties was carried out in accordance with ASTM standards (International Test Method for Thin Plastic Sheeting) (D 8 82-02) using an Acquati electronic dynamometer mod. AG/MC1 (I) on which a load cell of 5 N was assembled. The result of the tests is expressed as an average of the analysis on 5 samples for each formulation. The film was preliminarily cut into strips with a length of 100 mm and width of 12.5 mm. Once it was verified that there were no breaks or a lack of homogeneity in the matrix, the samples were positioned longitudinally between two pneumatic clamps spaced at 60 mm from one another. The separation velocity of the clamps was set at 500 mm/min. The test was considered finished once the film broke. Variations in the rigidity of the material were measured by determining the elastic modulus (EM) after the preparation of the films and after three months of preservation at 40° C.
The addition of PVAc was considered positive if the variation of this value (EM) after 3 months from the preparation was lower than the EM variation of the formulation free of PVAc.
Results
The elastic modulus values EM are shown in Table 2.
The results show how the addition of PVA in the range 1-20% makes it possible to improve the mechanical properties of the film. Indeed, with respect to the reference formulation 1, the addition of PVA in the selected range makes it possible to reduce the variation (V) of elastic modulus parameter EM over time.
PVP-VA (60:40) was selected as copolymer of vinylacetate, to investigate the effect on tensile properties of films. Formulations reported in the Table 3 were prepared according to the method described in the Example 1.
Characterization of Placebo Orodispersible Films
Water content, disintegration time and tensile properties of films after preparation (T0) and after air exposure were evaluated.
Water Content
The water content was determined gravimetrically after keeping films samples of 9 cm2 surface at the temperature of 130° C. over a 2 h period. The results were expressed as the mean of three determination according to the following equation:
Where Wo and Wf are the initial and the final weight, respectively.
Disintegration Test
Disintegration test was performed according to the specifications of orodispersible tablet reported in Ph. Eur. 5.4 ed. (2.9.1) by using samples of 9 cm2.
Tensile Properties
Mechanical properties of orodispersible films (F0-F5) were evaluated using a texture analyzer Tinus Olsen H5K-T equipped with a 100 N load cell. Each film was placed in tensile grips on the texture analyzer. Initial grip separation was 100 mm and crosshead speed was 50 mm/min. The test was considered concluded at the film break. Measurements were run in five replicates for each film. Tensile strength, elongation at break and elastic modulus were calculated to evaluate tensile properties of orodispersible films, as recommended by the ASTM D882-02 Standard Test method.
Tensile strength (TS): was calculated by dividing the maximum load by the original cross sectional area of the specimen, it was expressed in force per unit area (MPa).
Percent elongation at break (E %): was calculated by dividing the extension at the moment of rupture of the specimen by the initial gage length of the specimen and multiplying by 100.
Elastic modulus or Young's modulus (EM) was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the stress strain curve. The results was expressed in force per unit area (MPa).
Before the test, film thickness of each specimen was measured by using an electronic micrometer (ChemInstruments, USA).
Results
Formulations having the same qualitative composition, i.e. F7-F13 and F14-F16, were compared to each other. All films disintegrated in less than 1 minute evidencing that the addition of PVP-VA in different ratios did not affect the dissolution of MDX films.
Tensile properties of orodispersible films gives an indication of the strength and elasticity of the film, reflected by the parameters: tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (E %) and Elastic modulus or Young modulus (EM). The ductility of films is expressed as elongation at break (E %), while the toughness is expressed as the tensile strength and elastic modulus.
The flexibility and toughness of the film affect manufacturing process of films such as cutting, film formation and packaging.
Oral film should be flexible to be handled without failure and at the same time should exhibit a tensile strength that guarantees a suitable toughness to allow films to be self-supporting. Elongation at break should be low to avoid deformation of films during manufacturing process.
Tables 4 and 5 show results of water content and tensile properties of films F7-F13 immediately after preparation on lab-scale, minimizing air exposure, and after air exposure (to simulate the usual environment on large-scale production).
Films loaded with PVP-VA were homogeneous and opaque. The residual water content was in the range 8.2-10.1%. All films were handled without failure. Increase of PVP-VA amount in the formulations caused increase of tensile strength and elastic modulus and decrease of elongation at break. Film with more PVP-VA were tougher, stiffer and less ductile. PVP-VA affected tensile properties of films.
As stated above, after air exposure, orodispersible films F7, without vinyl acetate polymers, were not tested because films were very brittle and were subjected to failures during handling. Formulations F8-F13 with PVP-VA in the range 1-10% were tough and flexible and could be handled without failure.
Formulations F8-F13 are suitable to be handled during the different steps of the manufacturing process, because can be exposed to air without any failure, while formulation F7, without PVP-VA, is air-sensitive and cannot be handled in a normal production environment.
Tables 6 and 7 show results of tensile properties of films F14-F16 immediately after preparation on lab-scale, minimizing air exposure, and after air exposure (to simulate the usual environment on large-scale production).
Also in this case, after air exposure, orodispersible films F14 without any vinyl acetate polymer were not tested because films were very brittle and were subjected to failures during handling. Formulations 15 and F16 with PVP-VA at 3 and 5% respectively became tougher, but were enough flexible to be handled without failure
Formulations F15 and F16 are suitable to be handled during the different steps of the manufacturing process, because can be exposed to air without any failure, while formulation F14, without PVP-VA, is air-sensitive and cannot be handled in a normal production environment, like F7.
Preparation of the Film
The films, the composition of which is shown in Table 8, were prepared as described in Example 1.
Determination of the Mechanical Properties
The elastic modulus (EM) was determined as described in Example 1.
Disintegration Test
The disintegration test was carried out according to the specifications for orodispersible tablets shown in Eur. Ph. Ed. 7.0, setting the time T<3 min and using samples of 6 cm2.
For every formulation, three tests were carried out and the results were expressed as an average±standard deviation.
Dissolution Test
The dissolution test in vitro was carried out on samples of 6 cm2 using “Basket Dissolution Apparatus” (Eur. Ph. 7.0, Section 2.9.3).
The following parameters characterise the method used for evaluating the % drug dissolved:
The buffer volume described was inserted in the 7 vessels of the dissolution system and the system was left to settle at the set temperature of 37° C. A film was introduced in each of the first 6 baskets, the 7th vessel was used as the control and therefore the relative basket was kept empty.
Once the set temperature was reached, the baskets were lowered into the dissolution medium. After 5 minutes, an aliquot was taken from each vessel. The samples obtained were analysed in HPLC by using the following method.
HPLC Agilent 1100, with Grace Alltima HP C18 column with dimensions 100×4.6 mm and 3 μm. An isocratic elution was carried out comprising mixing a mobile phase A and a mobile phase B. Phase A consisted in 90% of a 20 mM phosphate buffer at pH 2.0 prepared dissolving 3.12 g of sodium dihydrogen phosphate in 1 litre of Milli-Q water and regulating the pH to 2.0 with conc. phosphoric acid (H3PO4) and 10% of tetrahydrofuran for HPLC. Phase B consisted of grade HPLC Methanol. The two phases were mixed in the proportions indicated here: Phase A: 40%, Phase B: 60%.
The column temperature was set at 40° C., flow 1.3 ml/min, selected wavelength 254 nm, injection volume 2 μl.
Results
The results shown in table 9 indicate that the addition of PVAc makes it possible to obtain films having mechanical properties and tensile strength that are considerably higher than reference films, without PVAc, while maintaining unaltered disgregation and release characteristics.
A sildenafil mass was prepared as described below using the amounts of the components reported in Table 11.
Glycerol, polysorbate 20, propylene glycol monocaprylate and water were added into the mixer and stirred at 25° C. Titanium dioxide and subsequently sildenafil citrate were added while mixing. Then polyvinyl acetate dispersion was added to the mixture under stirring. Afterward maltodextrin and a solution containing colour and flavours were added. The mixture was stirred until the blend was blue and homogeneous.
The mixture was spread on a silicone/PET liner and dried in a oven. The film, removed from the liner, is carefully cut into strips and pouched in suitable sealed sachets.
The composition of the film is reported in the following Table 11.
Bioequivalence Study
In-Vitro Study: Comparative In Vitro Dissolution Profile at pH 5.5
The dissolution profile of the sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film obtained above was compared to that of the conventional marketed 100 mg film-coated tablet (Viagra®, Pfizer).
Dissolution Conditions:
Results:
The Results are Reported in
Dissolution profiles of the Sildenafil Orodispersible film and the Viagra® tablet (reference drug) are overlapping.
More than 85% of the label content dissolved within 15 minutes, so both the drug products, Viagra® tablet and Sildenafil Orodispersible film, are considered “very rapidly” dissolving, and the similarity of their dissolution profiles is accepted without any mathematical calculation, as stated in the Guideline on the investigation of Bioequivalence.
Results of the comparative in vitro dissolution reflects the bioequivalence of Sildenafil Orodispersible films to the reference product Viagra® tablet.
In Vivo Study
The pharmacokinetics of the sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film was compared to that of the conventional marketed 100 mg film-coated tablet (Viagra®, Pfizer) after single dose administration to 53 healthy male volunteers (aged 18-51 years) in a randomized, open, 2-way cross-over bioequivalence study. Each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg of sildenafil as test or reference formulation and then blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected up to 24 hours post-dosing.
The Sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film test treatment was administered to the subject without water, while the sildenafil 100 mg reference formulation was administered to the subject with 240 mL of water to help the swallowing.
Rate (peak plasma concentration; Cmax), extent (area under the curve from administration to last observed concentration time; AUC0-t) of sildenafil absorption and plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of sildenafil after single dose administration of test and reference were compared.
Results
The majority of the subjects judged the palatability of the sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film to be good/acceptable. The dissolution in the mouth took always less than 3 minutes, without use of water, for all the subject.
Sildenafil administered as a single dose of test or reference product was well tolerated.
The mean±standard deviation (SD) plasma sildenafil pharmacokinetic parameters are reported in Table 12.
The mean sildenafil plasma concentration-time profiles up to 24 hours after single-dose administration of sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film and film-coated tablet were nearly superimposable. The bioequivalence test was fully satisfied for sildenafil in terms of rate and extent of bioavailability. The results suggest that the new orodispersible film formulation can be used interchangeably with the conventional film-coated formulation.
The mean plasma concentration-time profiles up to 24 hours of sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film and the film-coated tablet were nearly superimposable.
The sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film (test) and the 100 mg film-coated tablet (reference) were determined to be bioequivalent with respect to sildenafil rate and extent of absorption.
Moreover, Sildenafil orodispersible film offers a convenient, discrete method of intake with a rapid onset of action and the added patient convenience and acceptability of a dosage form that does not require administration with water, of particular benefit for men who have difficulty with swallowing conventional tablet or in whom daily fluid intake is restricted, as the orodispersible film does not require administration with water.
The Sildenafil orodispersible film has the advantages of an orodispersible formulation that dissolved rapidly in the oral cavity, without drinking or chewing.
The pharmacokinetics study show that the Sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film formulation and the 100 mg film-coated tablet were bioequivalent, without statistically significant difference. The results suggest that the new orodispersible film formulation could represent a valid alternative to the current marketed products for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, with the same efficacy but a better patient's compliance.
An orodispersible film containing Tadalafil was prepared according to the procedure reported in Example 5, using the components and the amounts reported in the following Table 13.
Comparison of Dissolution Profiles:
The dissolution profiles of Tadalafil 20 mg Orodispersible film obtained above and the reference product Cialis® 20 mg coated tablets were compared.
Dissolution Condition
Results:
The dissolution profiles of Tadalafil 20 mg Orodispersible film and reference product Cialis® are reported in
The dissolution profiles of Tadalafil Orodispersible film and reference product are overlapping, suggesting the bioequivalence of the Orodispersible film with the reference product Cialis®.
Moreover disintegration time in the oral cavity of Tadalafil orodispersible film is lower than 3 min, thus the formulation has the same efficacy as the reference drug (tablets) plus the advantages of the orodispersible film.
Orodispersible films containing progesterone and testosterone respectively were prepared according the procedure reported in Example 5, using the components and the amounts reported in the following Tables 14 and 15.
Both orodispersible films containing progesterone and testosterone showed a disintegration time in the mouth lower than 3 minutes.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| MI2012A001628 | Sep 2012 | IT | national |
This U.S. Non-Provisional Application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 15/423,887 filed Feb. 3, 2017, which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. Ser. No. 14/430,255 filed on Mar. 23, 2015, which is a U.S. National Stage Application of PCT/IB2013/058882 filed on 26 Sep. 2013, which claims priority to and the benefit of Italian Application No. MI2012A001628, filed on 28 Sep. 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15423887 | Feb 2017 | US |
| Child | 17238263 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14430255 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Child | 15423887 | US |
