This disclosure relates to improved self-locking or ligatureless orthodontic brackets.
Orthodontic treatment generally comprises dental work to correct irregularities of the teeth or of the relation of the teeth to surrounding anatomy. The irregularities may involve malocclusions with varying degrees of severity. Class 1 malocclusions, for example, may involve spacing irregularities such as excessive crowding or diastema (a gap between two adjacent teeth). Class 2 malocclusions may involve overbite conditions where the upper anterior teeth project labially over the lower anterior teeth. Class 3 malocclusions, in contrast, may involve underbite conditions where the upper anterior teeth close within the lingual side of the lower anterior teeth. For these and other observed irregularities treatment typically involves installation of braces or mechanical aids for repositioning the teeth into correct orthodontic alignment.
Braces generally include orthodontic brackets configured for attachment to the labial or lingual surfaces of the teeth or for attachment to metallic bands secured around the teeth. The brackets typically include archwire slots within which a flexible yet resilient archwire may be engaged. Each bracket is typically bonded to the tooth surface so that the bracket's archwire slot is oriented for engagement with the archwire. Various techniques are used for orienting the brackets. For example, an edgewise appliance comprises braces whereby each bracket is oriented and bonded to the tooth so that the archwire slot is perpendicular to the long axis of the root of the tooth. Alternatively, a straight-wire appliance includes braces whereby each bracket is oriented and bonded to the tooth so that the archwire slot is parallel to the occlusal plane (the biting surfaces of the teeth).
The archwire is typically a curved metallic wire having a rectangular or circular cross section that is bent or twisted prior to engagement with the brackets. The memory or restoring force exerted by the archwire upon the brackets serves to move the teeth into the desired alignment. Throughout the duration of orthodontic treatment the orthodontist periodically adjusts the shape of the archwire (as well as the configuration of other attachments such as elastic bands and so forth) to achieve the correct orthodontic alignment.
Most brackets in current use incorporate tie wings or extensions that project upwardly and downwardly in a gingival-occlusal orientation and require the use of ligatures or ligating modules to hold the archwire within the archwire slots. The ligatures or ligating modules are typically donut-shaped elastomeric rings or wires that are stretched around or twisted around the tie wings.
The use of such ligatures or ligating modules presents a number of inherent disadvantages, some of which are mentioned herein. The small size of the ligatures or ligating modules requires substantial time for installation of the archwire. Because the orthodontist will typically make numerous adjustments to the archwire throughout orthodontic treatment, the orthodontist will likely remove and replace the ligatures or ligating modules numerous times. Hygiene is another problem since the use of ligatures or ligating modules increases the areas where food particles may be trapped. Further, with movement due to chewing or other activities, the ligatures or ligating modules may become detached altogether, allowing the archwire to disengage from the archwire slots.
Ligatures or ligating modules also present other limitations in terms of the forces exerted upon the brackets. For example, the labial or outward force that may be applied to a tooth having a bracket bonded to its labial surface is limited to the strength of the ligature or ligating module in the labial direction. On the same tooth, the force that may be applied in the lingual direction is not so constrained (because the force is applied against the bracket structure rather than the ligature or ligation module). Similarly, the longitudinal (or mesial-distal) forces which may be applied along the direction of the archwire may be limited or defined by the friction between the ligature or ligation module and the archwire. By contrast, a means for locking the archwire within the archwire slot would enhance the forces that may be exerted along the direction of the archwire. Likewise, a means for slideably retaining the archwire within the archwire slot would allow greater flexibility than available from brackets requiring the use of ligatures or ligation modules.
Several self-locking or self-ligating (ligatureless) orthodontic brackets have been designed. However, most of those have complex designs, incorporating features requiring prohibitively expensive machining operations or comprising multiple separate parts, which in turn increases the number of failure modes for such brackets. Other designs have been rejected in the marketplace due to poor quality or poor design, a lack of available features, difficulty of use, or other factors.
What is needed, therefore, is an improved orthodontic bracket that incorporates a self-ligating capability and that offers a different style of bracket than those available today.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, the drawings herein illustrate examples of the invention. The drawings, however, do not limit the scope of the invention. Similar references in the drawings indicate similar elements.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, those skilled in the art will understand that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details, that the present invention is not limited to the depicted embodiments, and that the present invention may be practiced in a variety of alternate embodiments. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and systems have not been described in detail.
Various operations will be described as multiple discrete steps performed in turn in a manner that is helpful for understanding the present invention. However, the order of description should not be construed as to imply that these operations are necessarily performed in the order they are presented, nor even order dependent.
Turning now to the several drawings,
As shown in
Also shown in
The bracket 100 preferably includes rounded edges, chamfered archwire slot ends 150, and an overall convex shape to improve comfort for the patient wearing the orthodontic appliance. As shown and as will be depicted in many of the illustrations herein, the ligating slide member 115, the channel formed by sides 120, and other features which may define the outer surfaces of the bracket 100 opposite the mounting base 105, preferably follow a convex shape to improve patient comfort and minimize the overall side profile or outward dimension of the bracket 100 from the bonding surface of the mounting base 105.
As shown, the archwire 210 is retained within the self-ligating bracket 200 and runs parallel to the occlusal surface (the cutting or incisal edge) of the tooth 205. Other orientations may be used with the bracket 200. However, this orientation is typical of a straight-wire (or Roth) appliance whereby crown angulation and crown inclination are engineered into the bracket 200 thereby allowing use of an archwire that is “straight” or parallel to the cutting edge of each tooth (when the teeth are positioned in correct orthodontic alignment). Crown angulation is generally the mesial-distal to gingival-occlusal orientation of the tooth and is affected by the mesial-distal orientation of the archwire slot (or slot tip). The crown angulation for the bracket 200 as shown in
Crown inclination is generally the labial-lingual to gingival-occlusal orientation of the tooth and is affected by the rotational orientation of the archwire slot (or slot torque) along the mesial-distal (or archwire) axis. The rotational orientation of the archwire slot will be discussed in greater detail below in the context of axial or sectional views of the bracket along the mesial-distal axis.
Whereas a straight-wire appliance typically includes individually engineered brackets with each bracket having the desired crown inclination (slot torque) and crown angulation (slot tip) for a particular tooth, other techniques may be used which require different orientations. For example, a standard edgewise appliance typically includes brackets having a rectangular profile and an orientation such that the centerline of the bracket is aligned along the gingival-occlusal axis (or long axis) of the clinical crown and perpendicular with the archwire slot. Typically, the brackets in a standard edgewise appliance have archwire slots that are not parallel to the incisal edges of the teeth (when the teeth are positioned in correct orthodontic alignment). Instead, the archwire is angled, bent, and twisted to define the desired position of the teeth.
Still referring to
As in
More particularly, in one embodiment, the resilient retention features 230 resemble coplanar fingers within the ligating slide member 220 which deflect outward in a mesial-distal direction around a mating protrusion 235 within the bracket 200. As the ligating slide member 220 slides downward (in the occlusal direction), the resilient retention features 230 deflect outward and then return toward their former positions as they lock about the mating protrusion 235. Just before the resilient retention features 230 reach their former positions a small portion of the outer ends of the resilient retention features 230 make contact with the smaller protrusions 240 which improve the (inward and coplanar) locking forces exerted on the resilient retention features 230.
Finally with regard to
Next,
Active engagement of the archwire 310 (particularly a rectangular archwire, as shown) within the (rectangular) archwire slot 320 also permits improved control of crown inclination. With the archwire 310 locked into the archwire slot 320, twists along the archwire 310 may be transmitted to the bracket 300 through the one or more active engagement protrusions 305 as well as contacts between the lengthwise edges of the rectangular archwire 310 and the surfaces of the correspondingly rectangular archwire slot 320. As previously mentioned, crown inclination is generally the labial-lingual to gingival-occlusal orientation of the tooth and is affected by the rotational orientation of the archwire slot 320 (or slot torque) along the mesial-distal (or archwire) axis.
In addition to the one or more active engagement protrusions 305 which may be formed upon the underside of the ligating slide member 315, one or more slide member stops 330 may be formed upon the underside of the ligating slide member 315 for preventing the ligating slide member 315 from sliding beyond the limits of a slide path 335 formed as a recessed area within the channel.
Other features of the bracket 300 illustrated in
In one embodiment, a vertical slot 350 may be incorporated into the bracket 300. The vertical slot 350 (indicated by broken lines) is shown oriented transverse to the archwire slot 320 in a gingival-occlusal direction and positioned between the archwire slot 320 and the mounting base of the bracket 300. Such a vertical slot (such as vertical slot 350) allows placement of auxiliaries in the vertical slot to facilitate tooth inclination, angulation, and rotation, if needed.
Next,
The underside of the ligating slide member 600 is illustrated in
The slide paths 825 and 830, in one embodiment, are sized to receive the slide member stops 715 and 720 as well as (particularly where an active engagement ligating slide member is used) the elongated protrusions 705 and 710. The slide paths 825 and 830 preferably extend to the other side of the archwire slot 810 to accommodate the elongated protrusions 705 and 710 when the ligating slide member is in a closed position. The larger mating protrusion 835 and smaller locking protrusions 840 may be as described previously and illustrated in
Still referring to
Next,
As commonly practiced in orthodontic treatment, brackets may be fabricated for a particular patient by prescription. The brackets may be engineered to include the appropriate slot torque and slot tip for each individual tooth for the particular patient. For example, specifically engineered brackets may be fabricated for the upper left central, the upper left lateral, the upper left cuspid, and so forth moving distally toward the upper left molars (using Palmer's notation for designating individual teeth). Each bracket typically incorporates a particular slot torque and slot tip as well as other features as may be needed. For instance, the bracket for the upper left cuspid may include a slot tip of, perhaps, 90 and include a ball hook for use with elastics or other features of the orthodontic appliance. Such a bracket may have the features as in
As shown,
As will be appreciated, variations of the improved orthodontic bracket described herein may be apparent. For example,
As shown in
Slide stops to prevent the ligating slide member 1305 from pulling completely away from the rest of the bracket 1300 may be provided by suitably formed sides 1320 as shown in
Although not shown, the bracket 1300 may incorporate sides 1320 that may be crimped inward as with sides 1105, 1110, 1115, and 1120 in
The improved orthodontic bracket described herein may comprise any of a wide variety of materials suitable for use in an orthodontic appliance. Such materials have commonly included plastics, ceramics, stainless steel, titanium, or other metal alloys. The bracket preferably comprises a biocompatible material with corrosion resistive properties, and the bracket preferably comprises materials which may be formed into the structure shown yet maintain suitable strength characteristics for retaining commonly used orthodontic archwires or other components of an orthodontic appliance.
Nickel may be the most common metal associated with contact dermatitis in orthodontics. Recent figures suggest that perhaps 10% of patients are sensitive to nickel. Nevertheless, nickel-containing metal alloys, such as nickel-titanium and stainless steel, are widely used in orthodontic appliances. Nickel-titanium alloys may have nickel contents above 50% and may potentially release enough nickel in the oral environment to elicit manifestations of an allergic reaction. Stainless steel has a much lower nickel content, perhaps around 8%, and, because the nickel is bound in a crystal lattice within stainless steel, the nickel may be less available to react. Consequently, stainless steel orthodontic components may be less likely to cause nickel hypersensitivity.
However, because of the remaining uncertainty regarding a particular patient's sensitivity to nickel, it may be desireable to provide nickel-free orthodontic brackets to avoid nickel hypersensitivity altogether. Therefore, the improved orthodontic bracket described herein preferably comprises a nickel-free material. In one embodiment, the bracket comprises a nickel-free cobalt-chromium alloy.
Several methods may be used to manufacture the improved orthodontic bracket described herein. For example, the bracket may be cast, machined, injection molded and so on. Injection molding of plastics may be used as may be ceramic injection molding (CIM) or metal injection molding (MIM) depending upon the materials chosen. Further, the bracket may comprise multiple assembled components. For instance, the bracket may comprise the assembly of a formed bracket body and a formed ligating slide member, the ligating slide member retained within the channel of the bracket body following a coining operation whereby the channel sides are crimped inward along the sides of the ligating slide member (forming a dovetail joint). A ball hook may be welded to the bracket assembly, and a wire mesh may be adhered to the mounting base of the bracket to improve its bonding surface.
In one embodiment, the improved orthodontic bracket base is formed of nickel-free cobalt chromium using a metal injection molding process whereby the ligating slide member is similarly constructed and attached using a coining operation to crimp the sides of the bracket base (bracket body). In one embodiment, the improved orthodontic bracket comprises a one-piece molded bracket body and a one-piece molded ligating slide member, the ligating slide member assembled to the bracket body using the aforementioned coining operation.
As described herein, the present invention provides an improved self-ligating orthodontic bracket. According to one embodiment, the improved orthodontic bracket may include a mounting base for attachment to a tooth surface, an archwire slot formed upon the base and sized for receiving an orthodontic archwire, a channel formed upon the base and transversely oriented to the archwire slot, and a ligating slide member slideably retained within the channel and closeable over the archwire slot for retaining the orthodontic archwire therein, wherein the ligating slide member includes at least one coplanar resilient retention mechanism for exerting retention forces coplanar with the ligating slide member for holding the ligating slide member in a closed position. In one embodiment, the improved orthodontic bracket comprises a bracket with a ligating slide member slideably retained within a dovetail shaped channel.
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the forgoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding equivalence of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200202713 | Nov 2002 | ES | national |
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/535,614, filed on May 19, 2005, which is a National Stage of International application Ser. No. PCT/ES2003/000594, filed Nov. 25, 2003, which claims the benefit of Spanish Patent Application No. 200202713, filed Nov. 26, 2002. The specifications of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011575 | Ford | Aug 1935 | A |
2549528 | Russell | Apr 1951 | A |
3087244 | Huettner et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3464113 | Silverman et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3578744 | Wildman | May 1971 | A |
3946488 | Miller et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4077126 | Pletcher | Mar 1978 | A |
4103423 | Kessel | Aug 1978 | A |
4268249 | Forster | May 1981 | A |
4371337 | Pletcher | Feb 1983 | A |
4419078 | Pletcher | Dec 1983 | A |
4491825 | Lerner | Jan 1985 | A |
4496318 | Connelly, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4559012 | Pletcher | Dec 1985 | A |
4634662 | Rosenberg | Jan 1987 | A |
4655708 | Fujita | Apr 1987 | A |
4698017 | Hanson | Oct 1987 | A |
4712999 | Rosenberg | Dec 1987 | A |
5037297 | Lerner | Aug 1991 | A |
5094614 | Wildman | Mar 1992 | A |
5123838 | Cannon | Jun 1992 | A |
5248257 | Cannon | Sep 1993 | A |
5275557 | Damon | Jan 1994 | A |
5299934 | Suyama | Apr 1994 | A |
5322435 | Pletcher | Jun 1994 | A |
5429500 | Damon | Jul 1995 | A |
5439378 | Damon | Aug 1995 | A |
5466151 | Damon | Nov 1995 | A |
5474446 | Wildman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5613850 | Wildman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5630715 | Voudouris | May 1997 | A |
5782631 | Kesling et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6042373 | Hermann | Mar 2000 | A |
6053729 | Brehm et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6071118 | Damon | Jun 2000 | A |
6071119 | Christoff et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6190166 | Sasakura | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193508 | Georgakis | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6220857 | Abels | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247923 | Vashi | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6347939 | Abels | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6357194 | Jones, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6726474 | Spencer | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6776613 | Orikasa | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6823638 | Stanchfield | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6866505 | Senini | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7025591 | Kesling | Apr 2006 | B1 |
20020025500 | Abels et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040072117 | Farzin-Nia et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040157186 | Abels et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166458 | Opin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050069833 | Chikami | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050186525 | Abels et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050239012 | Bathen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244773 | Abels et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244774 | Abels et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255422 | Cordato | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003281 | Nicholson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003282 | Nicholson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024634 | Lai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024635 | Lai | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051721 | Carriere Lluch | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084025 | Abels et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060110699 | Forster | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147868 | Lai et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154196 | Oda | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003282122 | Jun 2004 | AU |
PAA20000008056 | Dec 2001 | MX |
WO 9940871 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO0033760 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 2004047665 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050239012 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10535614 | US | |
Child | 11134189 | US |