Patent Grant
8374130
Wireless communication is widely used by computing devices. Because of its widespread use, there is a risk that, at any time in any location, multiple computing devices will be present and transmitting wireless signals. Such transmissions may interfere with each other. To avoid such interference, transmission schemes have been developed to separate wireless transmissions by one computing device from wireless transmissions by other computing devices operating in the same location.
One approach for separating transmissions is to define time slots for the computing devices. Computing devices in the same location may use different time slots for wireless communication so that devices that could interfere with each other are not transmitting at the same time. This approach is sometimes called time division multiplexing.
Different protocols using different approaches to assign time slots are known. In some instances, time slots may be assigned to clients in a network. The time slots may be assigned in advance as part of the design of the network or may be assigned by a device acting as a network controller as devices connect to the network. Another approach is to allow individual devices in a network to select time slots by identifying time slots that are available for use.
As an example, 802.11 protocols use an approach called Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA) to allow clients to select available time slots. Under CSMA, a device wishing to transmit on a channel “listens” on that channel before transmitting. If the device senses traffic on the channel, it waits a random interval and then listens again to determine if the channel is then available. The device may repeat the process of sensing and waiting a random interval until the channel is available. After multiple attempts, if the channel is not available, the client may determine that the channel is not suitable. The client may then attempt to communicate over a different channel or may take other corrective action.
Another mechanism for separating transmissions is called Frequency Division Multiplexing. With Frequency Division Multiplexing, different devices may be assigned different ranges of frequencies to use as channels for communication. The transmissions from different devices may be separated using frequency domain filtering even if multiple devices are transmitting at the same time. For Frequency Division Multiplexing to be effective, the channels used by the devices in the same location should not overlap, which can limit the number of devices that may communicate in one location at a time, particularly if portions of the frequency spectrum are unavailable because of interference.
A refinement on frequency division multiplexing is called Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA). With OFDMA, an available range of frequencies is divided into multiple subcarriers. Each device may be assigned a set of subcarriers to use for transmitting information. The subcarrier assignments are said to be “orthogonal” in that the subcarrier assignments are made such that, to the extent practical each device uses a unique set of subcarriers. To the greatest extent possible, no subcarrier is used by more than one device. There is no requirement, however, that the subcarriers be contiguous. As a result, subcarriers can be flexibly assigned and there is a high likelihood that devices in the same location can communicate without interfering with each other.
Improved wireless communication for computing devices is provided by enabling the devices to exchange information about assignment of subcarriers to devices. Information about subcarrier usage may be communicated between devices using information elements embedded in control messages associated with a wireless network to which the computing devices may connect.
In one aspect, an information element may be used to communicate a subcarrier assignment from one device to another. That subcarrier assignment may be developed by one device, such as an access point, using OFDMA principles. That device also may sense activity in the subcarriers and limit use of particular subcarriers based on sensed activity in those subcarriers when making the assignments. Subcarrier assignments may be made by selecting and dynamically aggregating subcarriers or may be made by selecting a predefined group of subcarriers. If subcarriers are dynamically aggregated, sensed activity in a subcarrier may preclude use of that subcarrier in a subcarrier assignment. If subcarriers are assigned in predefined groups, sensed activity in any subcarrier in a group may preclude use of the group.
According to another aspect of the invention, a device configured to support OFDMA communications may communicate over a limited number of subcarriers, even if the device with which it is communicating is not configured to support OFDMA. The device may select a subset of subcarriers within a channel assigned to it. That device may communicate information on the selected subcarriers to other devices with which the device may communicate. Devices receiving transmissions from the device may use that information to identify subcarriers of an assigned channel that the transmitting device did not use. The receiving device may alter operation of its error detection and/or error correction software so that a lack of information received in the unused subcarriers will not be interpreted as an error.
To facilitate integration of these techniques into networks that may contain both OFDMA-capable and non-OFDMA-capable devices, information about subcarrier usage may be communicated in a format that can be received by a non-OFDMA-capable device. In some embodiments, network control messages, such as beacons and probes, may be transmitted using base rates accessible to non-OFDMA-capable devices. Control messages also may be used by devices to communicate their capability to support OFDMA communications.
The foregoing is a non-limiting summary of the invention, which is defined by the attached claims.
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
The inventors have appreciated that wireless communications among computing devices may be improved through the use of information elements in network control messages to communicate information related to subcarrier usage. The information may be a subcarrier assignment, an identification of subcarriers in use by a device, information about capabilities of a device to communicate over one or more subcarriers, or other suitable information that may be used in selecting or communicating over subcarriers.
By providing a mechanism to communicate information relating to subcarrier usage, subcarrier assignment techniques that facilitate wireless communication may be implemented. One mechanism for making a subcarrier assignment may include sensing activity levels within a channel and using sensed activity levels on subcarriers in making subcarrier assignments. In some embodiments of the invention, activity levels are sensed using processing that includes listening and waiting a random back-off interval before listening again, as is conventionally performed in CSMA systems. Activity may be sensed in subcarriers individually, such that subcarriers may be selected individually for assignment to devices. In other embodiments, an activity level may be determined in the aggregate within sub-channels formed of groups of subcarriers and subcarriers may be assigned by assigning a sub-channel based on activity within the sub-channel.
Enabling communication of subcarrier information may also facilitate devices identifying and selectively using subcarriers from a sub-channel assigned to the device. An OFDMA-capable device may be programmed to select subcarriers, for example, when the device is operating from a battery or other limited power source, the aggregate amount of energy it transmits may be reduced by limiting the subcarriers in which the device transmits and/or for which it decodes and processes information. When a device selects a subset of its assigned subcarriers, the selected subcarriers may be communicated to other devices with which the device communicates so that those devices do not interpret lack of information in subcarriers that were not selected as an error. Those other devices may alternatively or additionally use the information on subcarriers in use by the device to select subcarriers for transmission to the device.
Enabling communication of subcarrier information may also facilitate assignment of subcarriers based on the type of information to be communicated. A communication subsystem of a device, for example, may receive information from application programs executing on the device to determine communication needs. This information may be used in making a subcarrier assignment to provide a sub-channel that has characteristics matching needs of the application.
These approaches of communicating and applying subcarrier assignment information may be used by OFDMA-capable devices, which contain hardware that can selectively transmit and receive on one or more designated subcarriers. These approaches may be used instead of or in addition to communication according to OFDMA based protocols, such as Wi-Fi. However, aspects of the invention can be used even in devices that are not OFDMA-capable. In some embodiments, information relating to subcarrier usage is conveyed as information elements added to network control messages in a standard format, such as control messages transmitted according to an 802.11 protocol or the Wi-Fi protocol. According to these protocols, such messages may use base rates encoded in a format that can be received by devices that are not OFDMA-capable.
In addition, according to embodiments of the invention, an OFDMA-capable device may exhibit different behaviors, depending on whether it is communicating with another an OFDMA-capable device. Information indicating which devices are OFDMA-capable may also be communicated in network control messages and used to shape behavior of devices that respond differently to OFDMA-capable and non-OFDMA-capable devices.
A device that does not support OFDMA may be programmed to respond to a message indicating that a device with which it is communicating is using a subset of assigned subcarriers by modifying its error detection and error correction processing to ignore subcarriers in which no information is being transmitted. In some embodiments, this change can be implemented in software, allowing OFDMA-capable devices to interface with non-OFDMA capable devices.
Regardless of the nature of network 120, wireless access point 122 provides an interface for wireless devices to connect to network 120. In the example of
Because multiple devices may be transmitting radio frequency signals within cell 100, access point 122 and other wireless devices within cell 100 may employ techniques to reduce interference between devices in the cell. In the embodiment illustrated, wireless access point 122 may communicate using frequencies within an assigned channel. That channel may be divided into multiple subcarriers, different groups of which may be used by different devices within cell 100 to avoid interference.
In some embodiments, wireless devices within cell 100 may communicate using orthogonal sub-channel assignments. Some or all of the wireless devices may be OFDMA-capable. Though, it is not necessary that all devices within the cell be OFDMA compatible, and in some embodiments, some or all of the devices within cell 100 are not OFDMA-capable.
In the embodiment illustrated, access point 122 may assign subcarriers, though any suitable device may make subcarrier assignments. Any suitable criteria may be used in making assignments. In addition to selecting subcarriers for laptop 110 and VoIP interface 130 that are orthogonal, access point 122 may assign different numbers of subcarriers to provide links between access point 122 and the other devices based on applications executed by those devices.
To facilitate allocation of subcarriers, wireless devices within cell 100 may exchange subcarrier usage information. Subcarrier use information may communicate to a wireless device a subcarrier assignment determined by another device. Alternatively, subcarrier usage information may be sent from a device to notify other devices of the subcarriers in use by that device, though, other types of subcarrier usage information may be conveyed. For example, a first device may send information identifying a communication requirement that may be considered by a second device while forming a subcarrier assignment for the first device.
An ability to communicate a subcarrier requirement may allow subcarrier assignments that match network traffic requirements. By matching subcarrier assignments or traffic requirements, more efficient use of the available frequency spectrum may be made. As a specific example,
Accordingly, in an embodiment in which access point 122 generates subcarrier assignments for devices in cell 100, VoIP interface 130 may communicate with access point 122 as part of a negotiation process leading up to a subcarrier assignment for VoIP interface 130. As part of that negotiation, VoIP interface 130 may communicate to access point 120 that VoIP interface 130 requires a subcarrier assignment with a relatively small number of subcarriers.
In contrast, laptop 110 may communicate files or other data structures requiring relatively large amounts of data to be communicated wirelessly. In such a scenario, communication may be more efficient using larger packets that each carry more data. A communication subsystem within laptop 110 may determine, by polling application programs executing on laptop 110 or in any other suitable way, that laptop 110 has a requirement for a subcarrier assignment with a relatively larger number of subcarriers to support effective communication of larger packets. Laptop 110 may communicate this requirement to access point 122 as part of a negotiation leading up to access point 122 making a subcarrier assignment for laptop 110.
A negotiation with a device that makes a subcarrier assignment, such as access point 122, in the example of
The scenario illustrated in
Regardless of the number and type of interactions, information used to negotiate a subcarrier assignment may be communicated between devices in any suitable form. According to embodiments of the invention, the information may be communicated in a form that makes it readily accessible even to devices that have not associated with access point 122. Additionally, the information may be made available in a format that can be received by a wide range of devices regardless of the types of subcarrier operations those devices perform. For example, devices that support communication according to the WiMax standard are OFDMA-capable. Such devices may be present within cell 100. However, many current devices do not support WiMax and are not OFDMA-capable. Accordingly, a subcarrier assignment may be negotiated using communications in a format that may be interpreted by both OFDMA-capable devices and non-OFDMA-capable devices.
According to an embodiment of the invention, information used in negotiating a subcarrier assignment may be exchanged in control messages as are used in operating of known wireless networks. Such control messages, even when sent by devices that are OFDMA-capable, may be transmitted in a base rate format that can be interpreted by non-OFDMA-capable devices. As a specific example, layer two network control messages may be used as a vehicle for transmitting subcarrier use information.
According to standard communication protocols, such as Wi-Fi and WiMax, such control messages may include information elements that convey information unrelated to the control information inherent in the control message. One or more information elements in each control message may be used to communicate subcarrier use information.
As a specific example, the Wi-Fi and WiMax standards specify control message such as a beacon, a probe, a probe response and an acknowledgement. A beacon control message may be transmitted periodically by an access point. A probe may be sent by a device attempting to associate with the access point. An access point may respond to a probe message with a probe response control message. The device may respond to a probe response with an acknowledgment message. Other control message, such as a renew message and a renew acknowledgment may also be employed. These or other types of control messages supported by other network types may alternatively or additionally be used as a vehicle for conveying subcarrier use information.
Regardless of the specific vehicle used to convey subcarrier use information, the information may be used according to embodiments of the invention to control wireless devices. Possible uses of subcarrier use information are explained in conjunction with the following figures.
Channel 200 is divided into multiple subcarriers 2101, 2102 . . . 21024 (of which only 2101, 2102 and 21024 are number for simplicity). In this example, 24 subcarriers are illustrated. However, the number of subcarriers within channel 200 is not critical to the invention, and any suitable number may be used. Also, in the embodiment illustrated, the subcarriers are contiguous and span the entire range from F0 to FM. While such a configuration may provide more efficient processing of wireless signals as devices, it is not a requirement of the invention that the subcarriers be contiguous. Additionally,
Regardless of the shape and size of each of the subcarriers, each subcarrier represents a range of frequencies that may be used by devices communicating within channel 200 to separately communicate information. For example, a device may interpret a signal transmitted in the frequency range represented by subcarrier 2101 as representing information. A signal in the frequency range represented by subcarrier 2102 may be separately detected and interpreted by the same device as conveying information that may be unrelated to the information conveyed by subcarrier 2101.
Because each subcarrier may convey information independent of information conveyed by other subcarriers, different subcarriers may be assigned to different devices to use. As a result, at any given time, the signal activity within channel 200 may be different in different subcarriers.
In this example, each of the subcarrier selections 310 and 320 includes six subcarriers. This number is depicted for illustration only, and each selection may include any suitable number of subcarriers. As illustrated, subcarrier selection 310 includes subcarriers 2205, 2209, 22013, 22015, 22018 and 22020. In contrast, subcarrier selection 320 (
Though orthogonal subcarrier selections may be used in making subcarrier assignments, signal activity may also be considered in making the subcarrier assignments. In subcarrier selection 310 (
Information elements 330 and 340 illustrate a possible representation for a subcarrier assignment. Each of the information elements 330 and 340 may be stored in computer storage media associated with access point 122 or other device making subcarrier assignments. The subcarrier assignments may be used in formatting transmissions to specific devices and/or for decoding transmission from those devices. For example, signals received in subcarriers 2205, 2209, 22013, 22015, 22018 and 22020 may be decoded to generate digital bits which may be combined to represent a single transmission from device 1. To send a block of digital bits to device 1, the block of digital bits may be represented by a collection of signals transmitted in in subcarriers 2205, 2209, 22013, 22015, 22018 and 22020. Information may similarly be exchanged with device 2 using the subcarriers in the subcarrier assignment represented by information element 340.
Other fields, not expressly shown, may also be present. For example, a field identifying the information element as a subcarrier assignment may also be present. However, any suitable representation may be used to represent an information element according to embodiments of the invention.
Regardless of the specific form of an information element, the information element may be stored in computer memory associated with devices that will communicate with the devices indicated in the information elements. The information elements may be communicated from a device generating the subcarrier assignment to other devices in any suitable way. In some embodiments, the information elements may be inserted into control messages, such as a beacon, probe, probe response or an acknowledgment. As described above, some standardized protocols allow devices to insert information elements into such control messages. Such standardized protocols may be used to convey information elements, such as information elements 330 and 340. When such standardized protocols are used, the information elements may be inserted into control messages using known hardware and software components. However, any suitable protocol may be used for conveying information elements between devices, and the information elements may be incorporated into any suitable messages communicated between devices.
Information element 440 is illustrated in
In the example of
Groups 5101 . . . 5104 may be formed in any suitable way. In some embodiments, the groups may be predefined by a network administrator. Regardless of how the groups 5101 . . . 5104 are defined, signal activity level may also be considered in making subcarrier assignments. As shown in
Regardless of how a group with a relatively high signal activity level is detected, groups with relatively high signal activity levels may be omitted in making sub-channel assignments. In the scenario illustrated in
The above-described techniques for subcarrier assignments may be used in a process executed in a device performing subcarrier assignments. In the environment illustrated in
Process 600 begins at block 610 when access point 122 receives a request for a subcarrier assignment in a probe message. In
Regardless of how the request is communicated to access point 122, the process may proceed to block 612. At block 612, orthogonal subcarriers may be selected. Orthogonal subcarriers may be selected in any suitable way. Techniques as known in the art for selecting orthogonal subcarriers in OFDMA systems may be used at block 612. Such a selection may result in completely disjoint sets of subcarriers being selected for an assignment to each device. However, the invention is not so limited, and, orthogonal sets of subcarriers may provide separation between transmissions by devices without being completely disjoint. In some embodiments, sets of subcarriers may be selected that contain subcarriers used in other sets. Accordingly, any suitable processing may be used at block 612 to select a set of subcarriers.
Any suitable number of subcarriers may be selected at block 612. In some embodiments, the number of subcarriers may be fixed. In other embodiments, the number of subcarriers selected may be based on parameters included in the request received at block 610. Regardless of the number of subcarriers selected, processing may proceed to block 614. At block 614, signal activity levels may be sensed in the selected subcarriers.
Process 600 may branch at decision block 620 depending on the levels sensed at block 614. If activity is detected in at least one subcarrier, the process branches to block 622. Conversely, if no activity is detected, the process branches to block 630. Any suitable criteria may be used at decision block 620 to determine whether activity is present. For example, detected signal levels may be compared to a threshold as described above in connection with
At block 622, a random interval is selected and the process waits until that random interval passes. At block 624 activity in the selected subcarriers may again be sensed and the process may again branch depending on the sensed activity level. If no activity is sensed, the process may branch from decision block 624 to block 630. Alternatively, if activity level is again detected, processing may proceed to block 626.
If processing reaches block 626, a signal level indicating active use of at least one of the selected subcarriers has been detected. The process of sensing and waiting a random back-off interval may be repeated multiple times. However, in the embodiment illustrated in
The process then loops back to block 614 where the process of detecting active subcarriers is repeated for the new selection of subcarriers. The process may loop through blocks 614, 620, 622, 624 or 626 until a selection of subcarriers is made that meets defined selection criteria.
If none of the subcarriers has an activity level sufficiently high to indicate the subcarrier is in active use, the process may branch from decision block 620 to block 630. At block 630, the selected subcarriers may be used to form a subcarrier assignment. Those subcarriers may be represented in an information element which may be included in a beacon. Access point 122 may then send the subcarrier assignment as part of its next beacon transmission.
At block 632, the access point 122 may communicate with the device for which is the assignment was made using the assigned subcarriers. The process may than branch at decision block 634 based on whether the subcarrier assignment needs to be updated. Because channel activity may change over time, subcarrier assignments made based upon signal activity level may be updated. Any suitable trigger events may be used to determine whether an update is required. In some embodiments, subcarrier assignments may be updated periodically. In other embodiments, subcarrier assignments may be updated in response to communication problems or other events that may indicate that signal activity levels have changed. Accordingly, the specific processing used at decision block 634 to determine whether an update is required is not critical to the invention. However, if no update is required, the process loops back to block 632 where the previously assigned subcarriers are used for communication. Conversely, if, as determined at decision block 634 an update is required, the process branches back to block 614 where the activity level in selected subcarriers is again sensed and the subcarrier selection may be changed if activity is detected.
Regardless of how the request is communicated, the process proceeds to block 712. At block 712, the device making the assignment selects a group of subcarriers based on the request. In contrast to the processing at block 612 (
Once an initial selection of a subcarrier group is made a block 712, process 700 proceeds to a loop involving blocks 714, 720, 722, 724, and 726. This loop may be repeated until a suitable group of subcarriers is selected or an error condition (not illustrated) is identified.
Regardless of the exit condition from the loop, processing begins at block 714. At block 714, activity within the selected group of subcarriers is selected. The activity may be sensed in any suitable way, including separately sensing activity in each of the subcarriers. Though, in some embodiments, a wideband measurement may be made that senses activity level within the group.
Regardless of how activity level is sensed, if activity is sensed, the process branches at decision block 720 to block 722. At block 722, a random interval is selected and process 700 waits that random interval.
At decision block 724, activity level across the sub-channel defined by the selected group of subcarriers is again sensed. Process 700 branches based on sensed activity level. If activity is sensed, the process proceeds to block 726. At block 726, an alternative group of subcarriers is selected. The process then loops back to block 714 where activity within the selected group of subcarriers is again sensed.
Process 700 illustrates that an alternative group is selected at block 726 after two attempts are made to sense activity. Any suitable criteria may be used to determine that a group of subcarriers is in use and therefore not suitable for assignment to a further device. Also, any suitable response may be made upon a determination that a group of subcarriers is active.
The loop represented by block 714, 720, 722, 724 and 726 may be repeated until a group of subcarriers that is not active is identified. Upon identification of such a group, process 700 branches, either from decision block 720 or decision block 724 to block 730. At block 730, the identified group of subcarriers is used to form an assignment. That assignment is communicated to the device requesting the subcarriers at block 710. In the embodiment illustrated, the subcarrier assignment is communicated in a beacon sent by access point 122 (
Once the subcarrier assignment is communicated, that device may configure itself for communication using the assigned group of subcarriers. Accordingly, process 700 proceeds to block 732 where the device communicates using the assigned subcarriers.
Periodically, or based on any other suitable trigger, process 700 may loop back to block 714. At block 714, the group of subcarriers assigned to a device may be sensed to determine whether it is still suitable for use by the assigned device. In the embodiment illustrated, updating the assignment may detail repeating the processing within the loop defined by block 714, 720, 722, 724 and 726.
Process 800 begins at block 810 where a device that generates subcarrier assignments formats a beacon. In this example, the device formatting a beacon at block 810 may be access point 122 (
As part of formatting the beacon at block 810, access point 122 may generate an information element indicating whether the device is OFDMA-capable. Any suitable mechanism may be used to indicate such a capability. As one example, a bit set in an information element transmitted in conjunction with the beacon may be used to signify that the device is OFDMA-capable. Accordingly, formatting a beacon at block 810 may entail including an information element with such a bit set in the beacon.
Regardless of the specific formatting used, the process may proceed to block 812. At block 812, access point 122 may transmit the beacon, including the information element. The beacon may be transmitted using circuitry and techniques as are known in the art. However, any suitable mechanism may be used for processing at block 812.
Process 800 continues to block 820 where the transmitted beacon is received by a device. The beacon may be received by any device within cell 100. In embodiments in which the beacon is transmitted using known hardware and techniques, the beacon may be received at block 820 also using known hardware and techniques. However, as with processing at block 812, processing at block 820 may be performed in any suitable way.
Once received, the beacon may be analyzed to extract subcarrier use information. Analysis at block 822 may include extracting from the beacon information elements relating to subcarrier use. A tag, type code or other suitable identifier may be incorporated into information elements to indicate that the information elements relate to subcarrier usage. Additionally, each information element may include an address or other code to identify which devices are intended to process the usage information in the information element. In the example illustrated in
Regardless of the specific encoding of information within the beacon, the process may continue to decision block 824 after the beacon is analyzed. At decision block 824, process 800 may branch depending on whether the information received in the beacon indicates that access point 122 is OFDMA-capable. If access point 122 is OFDMA-capable, the process may proceed to subprocess 830. At subprocess 830, a subcarrier assignment may be made by access point 122 to the device. Subprocess 830 may entail a process, such as processes 600 (
Conversely, if processing at decision block 824 determines that access point 122 is not OFDMA-capable, process 800 may branch from decision block 824 to subprocess 840. At subprocess 840, a sub-channel may be assigned to the device. Any suitable mechanism may be used to assign a sub-channel, and the specific processing performed as part of subprocess 840 may depend on the capabilities of access point 122 and the device interfacing to it. For example, a sub-channel assignment may be based on an express request issued by the device. Alternatively, a sub-channel assignment may be inherent in use of a protocol supported by access point 122. Accordingly, subprocess 840 may result in a device and an access point both arising at a sub-channel in any suitable way.
The identified sub-channel may contain multiple subcarriers. In the embodiment illustrated, the device is battery powered and therefore may have limited available power. In such a scenario, it may be desirable to reduce the amount of power used by the client device in communicating with access point 122. Such a power reduction may be achieved by communicating with access point 122 using a subset containing less than all of the subcarriers in the assigned sub-channel. Though, the client device may benefit from communication over less than all of the assigned subcarriers for other reasons. For example, the client device may execute an application that requires transmission of relatively small amounts of data with relatively low latency. In this scenario or in other scenarios in which communication parameters in a link between the client device and access point 122 may be shaped by using a smaller number of sub-channels, the client device may select a subset of the subcarriers in the assigned sub-channel based on processing at block 842.
In some embodiments, using only a subset of the assigned subcarriers may result in access point 122 responding as if a communication error had occurred. Specifically, error correction and detection components within access point 122, upon finding no data within the non-selected subcarriers, may interpret the lack of information as being caused by a communication error. To prevent valid communications from being classified as erroneous, processing block 844 may communicate to access point 122 which subcarriers in the assigned sub-channel are not selected. Such information may be communicated by sending a list of selected subcarriers. Conversely, the same information may be communicated by sending a list of “blank” subcarriers, i.e., those subcarriers that are not being used. However, the information on selected subcarriers may be represented in any suitable way.
Regardless of how the information of blank subcarriers is represented, it may be transmitted to access point 122. In the example of
Regardless of how the information on blank subcarriers is represented, that information may be received by access point 122 as part of processing within block 850. In this example, processing at block 850 entails access point 122 receiving the probe message and extracting the information element. Upon analysis of the information element, access point 122 may determine the identity of the client device that generated the information element and the specific subcarriers to be blanked by that device. At block 850, access point 122 may store that information for later use in conjunction with processing communications from the client device.
The process then proceeds to block 860 where the client device transmits using the selected subcarriers. In the example of
Regardless of how messages are transmitted at block 860, at block 870, access point 122 may receive the messages. Processing at block 870 may entail use of hardware and other conventional components. However, because access point 122 is not OFDMA-capable, access point 122 may decode all of the subcarriers assigned as part of subprocess 840. To account of the fact that the client device did not transmit in all of the assigned subcarriers, further processing may be performed within access point 122. At block 872, the access point 122 may blank the non-selected subcarriers. In this way, error correction and/or error detection processing that occurs following decoding of information in the assigned subcarriers will not erroneously signal an error because no information was detected in the blanked sub-channels.
Reception and blanking of select subcarriers may be performed in any suitable way.
In this example, the components illustrated in
In this example, hardware components 910 may be conventional hardware components as known in the art for incorporation into a network interface card. As illustrated, receiver 914 detects wireless signals in a frequency range corresponding to at least the sub-channel assigned to a client device with which the access point is communicating. Such radio frequency signals may be received through antenna 912 and coupled to receiver 914.
The output of receiver 914 is coupled to analog digital converter 916. One or more intermediate processing stages may be coupled between the receiver 914 and antenna 912 and between the receiver 914 and analog to digital converter 916. Such processing stages may be processing stages as are known in the art. However, any suitable processing may be performed within hardware elements 910.
Regardless of the processing performed on the signal applied as an input to analog to digital converter 916, analog to digital converter 916 translates the detected signal into a stream of digital values. In the example of
Within software components 950, a frequency domain representation of the stream of digital values may be computed. In this example, the frequency domain representation is computed through a mathematical operation sometimes called a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The output of such an operation is, for a stream of input digital values representing a received signal during a window in time, coefficients representing the magnitude of the frequency components in the received signal in discrete frequency ranges during that window of time. By appropriately configuring the parameters of FFT component 952, the frequency components represented by the output values may correspond to subcarriers in a communication channel. Thus, each output of FFT component 952 may represent a signal level in a subcarrier.
The output of FFT component 952 may be coupled to error correction component 954. Error correction component 954 may be a component as is known in the art for detecting and correcting errors in wireless communications. Error correction component 954 may analyze the values received in subcarriers corresponding to a sub-channel in use to detect values indicating a received signal that does not correspond to an allowed communication state. When error correction coding is used on a transmitted signal, as is known in the art, error correction component 954 may, upon detecting an improper state, determine the most likely allowed signal state that was transmitted to give rise to the detected improper operating state. In this way, error correction component 954 may detect and correct errors in received signals.
However, in scenarios in which one or more subcarriers have been blanked by a transmitting device, error correction component 954 may interpret received signals without information in the blanked subcarriers as corresponding to improper states and attempt to match those signals to proper signal states or reject them as uncorrectable. To prevent proper signals with blanked subcarriers from being rejected, error correction component may be modified from a conventional error correcting component. In this example, error correction component 954 receives as an input a list of blanked subcarriers 960. Error correction component 954 may use this list 960 of blanked subcarriers to ignore the blanked subcarriers in determining whether an improper operating state has occurred. In this way, a device, even though not OFDMA-capable, may communicate with a device that uses its OFDMA capabilities to transmit over a subset of assigned subcarriers.
In the example of
Any suitable component within access point 122 may receive such an information element, identify the information element as a list of blanked subcarriers and provide it to error correction component 954. Because, in the embodiments illustrated, control communications are transmitted using base rates that are not modified by the selection of subcarriers, error correction component 954 may properly process a control message conveying an information element with a list of blanked subcarriers. Accordingly, even though error correction component 954 is not initially configured to pass communications in which subcarriers have been blanked, level 2 processing component 956 can receive level 2 communications containing information elements that are used to configure error correction component 954.
Once error correction component 954 is configured, other communications sent with blanked subcarriers may be properly received and passed to level 2 process component 956. Data communications and other higher level messages may then be passed through level 2 processing component 956 to higher level processing components (not illustrated). Such higher level processing components may be components as in known wireless network devices or any other suitable components.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art.
Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
The above-described embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in any of numerous ways. For example, the embodiments may be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof. When implemented in software, the software code can be executed on any suitable processor or collection of processors, whether provided in a single computer or distributed among multiple computers.
Further, it should be appreciated that a computer may be embodied in any of a number of forms, such as a rack-mounted computer, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, or a tablet computer. Additionally, a computer may be embedded in a device not generally regarded as a computer but with suitable processing capabilities, including a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a smart phone or any other suitable portable or fixed electronic device.
Also, a computer may have one or more input and output devices. These devices can be used, among other things, to present a user interface. Examples of output devices that can be used to provide a user interface include printers or display screens for visual presentation of output and speakers or other sound generating devices for audible presentation of output. Examples of input devices that can be used for a user interface include keyboards, and pointing devices, such as mice, touch pads, and digitizing tablets. As another example, a computer may receive input information through speech recognition or in other audible format.
Such computers may be interconnected by one or more networks in any suitable form, including as a local area network or a wide area network, such as an enterprise network or the Internet. Such networks may be based on any suitable technology and may operate according to any suitable protocol and may include wireless networks, wired networks or fiber optic networks.
Also, the various methods or processes outlined herein may be coded as software that is executable on one or more processors that employ any one of a variety of operating systems or platforms. Additionally, such software may be written using any of a number of suitable programming languages and/or programming or scripting tools, and also may be compiled as executable machine language code or intermediate code that is executed on a framework or virtual machine.
In this respect, the invention may be embodied as a computer readable medium (or multiple computer readable media) (e.g., a computer memory, one or more floppy discs, compact discs, optical discs, magnetic tapes, flash memories, circuit configurations in Field Programmable Gate Arrays or other semiconductor devices, or other tangible computer storage medium) encoded with one or more programs that, when executed on one or more computers or other processors, perform methods that implement the various embodiments of the invention discussed above. The computer readable medium or media can be transportable, such that the program or programs stored thereon can be loaded onto one or more different computers or other processors to implement various aspects of the present invention as discussed above.
The terms “program” or “software” are used herein in a generic sense to refer to any type of computer code or set of computer-executable instructions that can be employed to program a computer or other processor to implement various aspects of the present invention as discussed above. Additionally, it should be appreciated that according to one aspect of this embodiment, one or more computer programs that when executed perform methods of the present invention need not reside on a single computer or processor, but may be distributed in a modular fashion amongst a number of different computers or processors to implement various aspects of the present invention.
Computer-executable instructions may be in many forms, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Also, data structures may be stored in computer-readable media in any suitable form. For simplicity of illustration, data structures may be shown to have fields that are related through location in the data structure. Such relationships may likewise be achieved by assigning storage for the fields with locations in a computer-readable medium that conveys relationship between the fields. However, any suitable mechanism may be used to establish a relationship between information in fields of a data structure, including through the use of pointers, tags or other mechanisms that establish relationship between data elements.
Various aspects of the present invention may be used alone, in combination, or in a variety of arrangements not specifically discussed in the embodiments described in the foregoing and is therefore not limited in its application to the details and arrangement of components set forth in the foregoing description or illustrated in the drawings. For example, aspects described in one embodiment may be combined in any manner with aspects described in other embodiments.
Also, the invention may be embodied as a method, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3343093 | Gerwen | Sep 1967 | A |
| 4210780 | Hopkins et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 5504775 | Chouly et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5729535 | Rostoker | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5790516 | Gudmundson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5867478 | Baum et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6175550 | Van Nee | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6295272 | Feldman | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6304611 | Miyashita et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6456653 | Sayeed | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6553534 | Yonge et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6609039 | Schoen | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6654431 | Barton et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6704572 | Whinnett | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721267 | Hiben | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6726297 | Uesugi | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6728551 | Chang | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6763072 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6810006 | Michon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6870808 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6882851 | Sugar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6904283 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6934246 | Park | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6934340 | Dollard | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6952454 | Jalali et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6961388 | Ling et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6976202 | Rezvani et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6987729 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7012883 | Jalali et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020071 | Mujtaba | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020073 | Kadous et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7035201 | Fu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7043023 | Watanabe et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043681 | Kroeger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047032 | Yun | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7072413 | Walton et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075967 | Struhsaker et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076246 | Chitrapu | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7126984 | Wang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7133471 | Feher | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7151925 | Ting et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7164649 | Walton et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7206350 | Korobkov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206840 | Choi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7551641 | Pirzada | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7672381 | Kleider | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7800541 | Moshfeghi | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7929623 | Hassan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7933344 | Hassan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7970085 | Hassan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8144793 | Hassan | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 20020031189 | Hiben | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119781 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020141446 | Koga | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157058 | Ariel | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188723 | Choi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030015423 | LaGreca | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026200 | Fu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058786 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067961 | Hudson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112880 | Walton | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123383 | Korobkov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154233 | Patterson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223354 | Olszewski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040005010 | He et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040008618 | Shirakata et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027997 | Terry et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029575 | Mehta | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073929 | Morello | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081121 | Xu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151108 | Claret et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151109 | Batra et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252775 | Park | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252781 | Park | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002325 | Giannakis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050013238 | Hansen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025039 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027789 | Luo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047259 | Ahn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050063345 | Wu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050078759 | Zhang | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085249 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099937 | Oh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111462 | Walton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117661 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050129136 | Fujii | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130684 | Kim et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141649 | Tanabe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050152466 | Maltsev et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157670 | Tang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160428 | Ayachitula et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180313 | Kim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197132 | Lee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228850 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050237989 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245197 | Kadous et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009209 | Rieser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034382 | Ozluturk et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060045001 | Jalali | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046716 | Hofstaedter et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056283 | Anikhindi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063543 | Matoba | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078059 | Ok et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083210 | Li et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094372 | Ahn | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060126493 | Hashem | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128318 | Agarossi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135075 | Tee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154691 | Tang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159120 | KIm | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171445 | Batra et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060176973 | Alamouti | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188003 | Larsson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188031 | Liu | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193295 | White et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211387 | Pisek et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211395 | Waltho | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250944 | Hong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269005 | Laroia et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287001 | Budampati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002728 | Fujii | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070009056 | Yeon et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016413 | Seo et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070032220 | Feher | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055501 | Aytur et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070058583 | Cho et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078924 | Hassan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086420 | Schotten et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116137 | McCoy | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133387 | Arslan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189162 | Song | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070263653 | Hassan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080057869 | Strong | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232340 | Wan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232490 | Gross et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090086706 | Huang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109914 | McBeath et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262849 | Jo | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100040167 | Aoki | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100208852 | Feher | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1468486 | Apr 2004 | CN |
| 1723676 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 1874334 | Dec 2006 | CN |
| 1 156 598 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1560344 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1578162 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 2005-167502 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-244997 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2005-260921 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 1020050052847 | Jun 2005 | KR |
| 505658 | Feb 2003 | NZ |
| 2219665 | Dec 2003 | RU |
| 1256789 | Jun 2006 | TW |
| 1257779 | Jul 2006 | TW |
| WO 9623371 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| WO 0074415 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0233925 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 02093839 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO 03088602 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004075499 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005076557 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005125250 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2007108077 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access,” Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia; retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ofdma, published Nov. 25, 2006, downloaded on Dec. 12, 2006, pp. 1-3. |
| Atarashi, H., “Broadband packet wireless access appropriate for high-speed and high-capacity throughput,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2001, pp. 566-570, vol. 1, Issue 2001. |
| Baumgartner, et al., “Performance of Forward Error Correction for IEEE 802.16e,” 10th International OFDM Workshop, Hamburg, Germany, Aug. 2005. |
| Blestas et al., “Efficient Collaborative (Viral) Communication in OFDM Based WLANs”, Proceedings of IEEE/ITS International Symposium on Advanced Radio Technologies (ISART 2003), Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder Colorado, Mar. 4-7, 2003, pp. 27-32. |
| Brodersen, et al. “Corvus: a cognitive radio approach for usage of virtual unlicensed spectrum.” Online. http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/publications/papers/CR—White—paper—final.pdf, 2004. |
| Cabric, et al., “A Cognitive Radio Approach for Usage of Virtual Unlicensed Spectrum,” in Proc. of 14th IST Mobile Wireless Communications Summit 2005, Dresden Germany, Jun. 2005, 4 pages unnumbered. |
| Chiani, et al., “Ultra Wide Bandwidth Communications towards Cognitive Radio,” EMC Europe Workshop, http://www-site.deis.unibo.it/Staff/giorgetti/pubblicazioni/Conferences/emc05—mcaggl.pdf, 2005, pp. 114-117, Rome, Italy. |
| Goeckel, et al., “On the Design of Multidimentional Signal Sets for OFDM Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 442-452, Mar. 2002. |
| Goeckel, “Coded Modulation With Non-Standard Signal Sets for Wireless OFDM Systems,” IEEE, pp. 791-795, 1999. |
| International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2007/010020, Search dated Nov. 5, 2007. |
| International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2007/085556, Search dated Mar. 26, 2008. |
| International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2007/011642 ,Search dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
| International Search Report from International Application PCT/US2007/010021, Search dated Oct. 17, 2007. |
| Johnsson, “HiperLAN/2—The Broadband Radio Transmission Technology Operating in the 5 GHz Frequency Band,” HiperLAN/2 Global Forum, 1999, Version 1.0. |
| Krenik, et al., “Cognitive Radio Techniques for Wide Area Networks,” Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference, Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Design Automation, 2005, 409-412, San Diego, USA, ISBN:1-59593-058-2. |
| Lawrey, et al., “Adaptive Frequency Hopping for Multiuser OFDM,” Second International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing, ICICS '99, Singapore, Dec. 7-10, 1999. |
| Li, et al., “Clustered OFDM with Channel Estimation for High Rate Wireless Data,” IEEE, 1999, pp. 43-50. |
| Mitola, III, et al., “Cognitive Radio an Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio,” Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Teleinformatics Electrum 204, SE-164 40 Kista Sweden, pp. title page through 304, May 8, 2000. |
| Mitola, et al., Absract from “Cognitive Radio: Making Software Radios More Personal,” Personal Communications, IEEE, Aug. 1999, vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 13-18, Stockholm, Sweden, ISSN: 1070-9916. |
| Okada, et al., “Pre-DFT Combining Space Diversity Assisted COFDM,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 487-496, Mar. 2001. |
| Pottie, “Wireless Multiple Access Adaptive Communications Techniques,” Online. http://www.ee.ucla.edu/˜pottie/papers/encycl.pdf, 1999. |
| Sereni et al., “A Software RADIO OFDM Transceiver for WLAN Applications,” Electronic and Information Engineering Department(DIEI)—University of Perugia—Italy, pp. 1-14, Apr. 2001. |
| She, et al., “Adaptive Turbo Coded Modulation for OFDM Transmissions,” Communication Technology Proceedings, 2003. ICCT 2003, Apr. 9-11, 2003, pp. 1491-1495, vol. 2, Beijing China. |
| Tewfik, et al., “High Bit Rate Ultra-Wideband OFDM,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM apos;02. IEEE, Nov. 2002, pp. 2260-2264, vol. 3. |
| Wahlqvist, et al., “A Conceptual Study of OFDM-based Multiple Access Schemes,” Telia, Jun. 5, 1996. http://www.es.lth.se/home/oes/pdfs/etsil.pdf. |
| Wang, et al., “Complex-Field Coding for OFDM Over Fading Wireless Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Mar. 2003, pp. 707-720, vol. 49, No. 3. |
| Wong, et al., “Multiuser OFDM with Adaptive Subcarrier, Bit, and Power Allocation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, No. 10, Oct. 1999, pp. 1747-1758. |
| Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2007/010020, Search dated Nov. 5, 2007. |
| Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2007/085556, Search dated Mar. 26, 2008. |
| Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2007/011642, Search dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
| Written Opinion from International Application PCT/US2007/010021, Search dated Oct. 17, 2007. |
| Zhang, et al., “Adaptive OFDM System Design for Cognitive Radio,” In: 11th International OFDM—Workshop, Aug. 30-31, 2006, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 91-95, IEEE Communications Society. |
| Youngblood, G., “A Software—Defined Radio for the Masses, Part 1,” http://www.ece.jhu.edu/˜cooper/SWRadio/Ybloodl.pdf, Jul./Aug. 2002, pp. 1-9. |
| “Software Defined Radio”, http://www.altera.com/end-markets/wireless/software/sdr/wir-sdr.html, 4 pgs. |
| “About SDR Technology,” 1 http://www.sdrforum.org/pages/aboutSdrTech/aboutSdrTech.asp, 1 pg. |
| “Software defined radio,” http://www.wipro.com/webpages/insights/softwareradio.htm, 1 pg. |
| CN Notice on the First Office Action for Application No. 200880125896.9, Aug. 27, 2012. |
| Alonistioti, “End-to-End Reconfigurability: Evolution on Reconfiguration Metamodel”, OMG SBC 2005, Aug. 17, 2005. |
| Bard, “Joint Tactical Radio System”, Space Coast Communication Systems Inc., 2003. |
| Bourse, “End-To-End Reconfigurability (E2R): Enabling Interoperability, Management and Control of Complex Heterogeneous Systems”, URSI GA 2005, Oct. 2005. |
| Sgandurra, “Achieving SCA Compliance for COTS Software Defined Radio, Second Edition”, Pentek, 2006. |
| PCT Written Opinion and International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US2008/087860, May 21, 2009. |
| International Search Report from corresponding Application No. PCT/US2007/010020, Nov. 5, 2007. |
| Examiner's First Report on Australian patent application No. 2007243348, May 24, 2010. |
| Office Action in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200780015172.4 dated Dec. 30, 2010. |
| Taiwan Search Report for TW 096116940, dated Sep. 8, 2010, 1 page. |
| JP Notice of Reason for Rejection for Application No. 2009-509894, Mar. 21, 2012. |
| CN First Office Action, Application No. 200780016912.6, Mar. 31, 2012. |
| JP Reason for Rejection, Application No. 2009-507775, Mar. 21, 2012. |
| Examiner's First Report dated Aug. 18, 2010 from Australian Patent Application No. 2007333404. |
| Tejera, “Subchannel Allocation in Multiuser Mutliple Input Mutliple Output Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. Jul. 4, 2006. pp. 1-34. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780045500.5 dated Jan. 31, 2012. |
| Roel Schiphorst, “A Bluetooth-enabled HiperLAN/2 receiver,” Vehicular Technology Conference 2003, pp. 3443-3447. |
| EP Communication for Application No. 08747424.3-1525/2143222 PCT/US2008062321, reference FB22296, Aug. 22, 2012. |
| Rhee, Increase in Capacity of Multiuser OFDM System Using Dynamic Subchannel Allocation, May 15, 2000. XP-000968037. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090190535 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
