Orthopaedic femoral component having controlled condylar curvature

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11337823
  • Patent Number
    11,337,823
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 28, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 24, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
An orthopaedic knee prosthesis includes a femoral component having a condyle surface. The condyle surface is defined by one or more radii of curvatures, which are controlled to reduce or delay the onset of anterior translation of the femoral component relative to a tibial bearing.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to orthopaedic prostheses, and particularly to orthopaedic prostheses for use in knee replacement surgery.


BACKGROUND

Joint arthroplasty is a well-known surgical procedure by which a diseased and/or damaged natural joint is replaced by a prosthetic joint. A typical knee prosthesis includes a tibial tray, a femoral component, and a polymer insert or bearing positioned between the tibial tray and the femoral component. Depending on the severity of the damage to the patient's joint, orthopaedic prostheses of varying mobility may be used. For example, the knee prosthesis may include a “fixed” tibial bearing in cases wherein it is desirable to limit the movement of the knee prosthesis, such as when significant soft tissue damage or loss is present. Alternatively, the knee prosthesis may include a “mobile” tibial bearing in cases wherein a greater degree of freedom of movement is desired. Additionally, the knee prosthesis may be a total knee prosthesis designed to replace the femoral-tibial interface of both condyles of the patient's femur or a uni-compartmental (or uni-condylar) knee prosthesis designed to replace the femoral-tibial interface of a single condyle of the patient's femur.


The type of orthopedic knee prosthesis used to replace a patient's natural knee may also depend on whether the patient's posterior cruciate ligament is retained or sacrificed (i.e., removed) during surgery. For example, if the patient's posterior cruciate ligament is damaged, diseased, and/or otherwise removed during surgery, a posterior stabilized knee prosthesis may be used to provide additional support and/or control at later degrees of flexion. Alternatively, if the posterior cruciate ligament is intact, a cruciate retaining knee prosthesis may be used.


Typical orthopaedic knee prostheses are generally designed to duplicate the natural movement of the patient's joint. As the knee is flexed and extended, the femoral and tibial components articulate and undergo combinations of relative anterior-posterior motion and relative internal-external rotation. However, the patient's surrounding soft tissue also impacts the kinematics and stability of the orthopaedic knee prosthesis throughout the joint's range of motion. That is, forces exerted on the orthopaedic components by the patient's soft tissue may cause unwanted or undesirable motion of the orthopaedic knee prosthesis. For example, the orthopaedic knee prosthesis may exhibit an amount of unnatural (paradoxical) anterior translation as the femoral component is moved through the range of flexion.


In a typical orthopaedic knee prosthesis, paradoxical anterior translation may occur at nearly any degree of flexion, but particularly at mid to late degrees of flexion. Paradoxical anterior translation can be generally defined as an abnormal relative movement of a femoral component on a tibial bearing wherein the contact “point” between the femoral component and the tibial bearing “slides” anteriorly with respect to the tibial bearing. This paradoxical anterior translation may result in loss of joint stability, accelerated wear, abnormal knee kinematics, and/or cause the patient to experience a sensation of instability during some activities.


SUMMARY

According to one aspect, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component and a tibial bearing. The femoral component may include a condyle surface that is curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component. In some embodiments, the condyle surface of the femoral component may contact the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion equal to about 0 degrees. The condyle surface may also contact the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion. The second degree of flexion may be greater than the first degree of flexion. For example, the second degree of flexion may be in the range of about 10 degrees to about 100 degrees. In one particular embodiment, the second degree of flexion is about 30 degrees.


The condyle surface in the sagittal plane may have a first radius of curvature at the first contact point and a second radius of curvature at the second contact point. The second radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters. For example, the second radius may greater than the first radius by a distance of at least 2 millimeters or by at least 5 millimeters. in some embodiments, the ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature is in the range of 0.50 to 0.99. For example, the ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature may be in the range of 0.90 to 0.99.


Additionally, in some embodiments, the condyle surface may contact the bearing surface at a third contact point on the condyle surface at a third degree of flexion. The third degree of flexion may be greater than the second degree of flexion and less than about 90 degrees. The condyle surface in the sagittal plane may have a third radius of curvature at the third contact point. The third radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature and less than the second radius of curvature. For example, in some embodiments, the third radius is greater than the second radius by at least 0.5 millimeters. However, in other embodiments, the third radius of curvature may be greater than the first and second radii of curvature.


In some embodiments, the condyle surface of the femoral component is a medial condyle surface and the bearing surface of the tibial bearing is a medial bearing surface. The femoral component may include a lateral condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a lateral bearing surface configured to articulate with the lateral condyle surface of the femoral component. In some embodiments, the lateral condyle surface and the medial condyle surface are substantially symmetrical in the sagittal plane. However, in other embodiments, the lateral condyle surface and the medial condyle surface are not substantially symmetrical in the sagittal plane.


Additionally, in some embodiments, the lateral condyle surface may contact the lateral bearing surface at a first point on the lateral condyle surface at a third degree of flexion. The third degree of flexion may be less than about 30 degrees. The lateral condyle surface may also contact the lateral bearing surface at a second point on the lateral condyle surface at a fourth degree of flexion. The fourth degree of flexion may be greater than the third degree of flexion. Additionally, the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane may include a first radius of curvature at the first contact point and a second radius of curvature at the second contact point. The second radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters. In some embodiments, the second radius of curvature of the lateral condyle may be different from the second radius of curvature of the medial condyle. Additionally, in some embodiments, the second degree of flexion may be different from the fourth degree of flexion. Further, in some embodiments, the difference between the first radius of curvature and the second radius of curvature is different from the difference between the third radius of curvature and the fourth radius of curvature.


According to another aspect, and orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component and a tibial bearing. The femoral component may include a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component. The condyle surface may contact the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion. The first degree of flexion may be less than 30 degrees. The condyle surface may also contact the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion. The second degree of flexion may be greater than about 30 degrees.


In such embodiments, the condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a first radius of curvature at the first contact point and a second radius of curvature at the second contact point. The ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature may be in the range of 0.80 to 0.99. For example, the ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature may be in the range of 0.90 to 0.99.


According to a further aspect, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component and a tibial bearing. The femoral component may include a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The tibial bearing may include a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component. The condyle surface may contact the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion. The first degree of flexion may be, for example, about 0 degrees. The condyle surface may also contact the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion. The second degree of flexion may be greater than about 50 degrees. For example, in some embodiments, the second degree of flexion may be greater than about 70 degrees.


In some embodiments, the condyle surface in the sagittal plane may include a curved surface section extending from the first contact point to the second contact point. The curved surface section may be defined by a substantially constant radius of curvature.


According to yet another aspect, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may include a femoral component. The femoral component may include a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane. The condyle surface may include an anterior surface and a posterior surface. The anterior surface and the posterior surface may meet at an inferior-most point on the condyle surface. The posterior surface may include a superior-most point and a mid-point located equidistance from the superior-most point and the inferior-most point. The posterior surface in the sagittal plane may have a first radius of curvature at a first point on the posterior surface between the inferior-most point and the mid-point. The posterior surface in the sagittal plane may have a second radius of curvature at a second point on the posterior surface between the first point and the superior-most point. The second radius of curvature may be greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description particularly refers to the following figures, in which:



FIG. 1 is an exploded perspective view of one embodiment of an orthopaedic knee prosthesis;



FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view of another embodiment of an orthopaedic knee prosthesis;



FIG. 3 is a cross-section view of one embodiment of a femoral component and tibial bearing of FIG. 1 taken generally along section lines 2-2 and having the femoral component articulated to a first degree of flexion;



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a femoral component and tibial bearing of FIG. 3 having the femoral component articulated to a second degree of flexion;



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a femoral component and tibial bearing of FIG. 3 having the femoral component articulated to a third degree of flexion;



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1;



FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1;



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1;



FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1;



FIG. 10 is a graph of the anterior-posterior translation of a simulated femoral component having an increased radius of curvature located at various degrees of flexion;



FIG. 11 is a graph of the internal rotation (as indicated by an upward or positive direction in the graph) of a simulated tibial insert with respect to the simulated femoral component of FIG. 10;



FIG. 12 is a graph of the anterior-posterior translation of another simulated femoral component having an increased radius of curvature located at various degrees of flexion;



FIG. 13 is a graph of the internal rotation (as indicated by an upward or positive direction in the graph) of a simulated tibial insert with respect to the simulated femoral component of FIG. 12;



FIG. 14 is a graph of the anterior-posterior translation of another simulated femoral component having an increased radius of curvature located at various degrees of flexion;



FIG. 15 is a graph of the internal rotation (as indicated by an upward or positive direction in the graph) of a simulated tibial insert with respect to the simulated femoral component of FIG. 14;



FIG. 16 is a graph of the anterior-posterior translation of another simulated femoral component having an increased radius of curvature located at various degrees of flexion;



FIG. 17 is a graph of the internal rotation (as indicated by an upward or positive direction in the graph) of a simulated tibial insert with respect to the simulated femoral component of FIG. 16;



FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1;



FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1;



FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1; and



FIG. 21 is a cross-sectional view of another condyle of another embodiment of the femoral component of FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

While the concepts of the present disclosure are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific exemplary embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the concepts of the present disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


Terms representing anatomical references, such as anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, superior, inferior, etcetera, may be used throughout this disclosure in reference to both the orthopaedic implants described herein and a patient's natural anatomy. Such terms have well-understood meanings in both the study of anatomy and the field of orthopaedics. Use of such anatomical reference terms in the specification and claims is intended to be consistent with their well-understood meanings unless noted otherwise.


Referring now to FIG. 1, in one embodiment, an orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 includes a femoral component 12, a tibial bearing 14, and a tibial tray 16. The femoral component 12 and the tibial tray 16 are illustratively formed from a metallic material such as cobalt-chromium or titanium, but may be formed from other materials, such as a ceramic material, a polymer material, a bio-engineered material, or the like, in other embodiments. The tibial bearing 14 is illustratively formed from a polymer material such as a ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), but may be formed from other materials, such as a ceramic material, a metallic material, a bio-engineered material, or the like, in other embodiments.


As discussed in more detail below, the femoral component 12 is configured to articulate with the tibial bearing 14, which is configured to be coupled with the tibial tray 16. In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 1, the tibial bearing 14 is embodied as a rotating or mobile tibial bearing and is configured to rotate relative to the tibial tray 12 during use. However, in other embodiments, the tibial bearing 14 may be embodied as a fixed tibial bearing, which may be limited or restricted from rotating relative the tibial tray 16.


The tibial tray 16 is configured to be secured to a surgically-prepared proximal end of a patient's tibia (not shown). The tibial tray 16 may be secured to the patient's tibia via use of bone adhesive or other attachment means. The tibial tray 16 includes a platform 18 having a top surface 20 and a bottom surface 22. Illustratively, the top surface 20 is generally planar and, in some embodiments, may be highly polished. The tibial tray 16 also includes a stem 24 extending downwardly from the bottom surface 22 of the platform 18. A cavity or bore 26 is defined in the top surface 20 of the platform 18 and extends downwardly into the stem 24. The bore 26 is formed to receive a complimentary stem of the tibial insert 14 as discussed in more detail below.


As discussed above, the tibial bearing 14 is configured to be coupled with the tibial tray 16. The tibial bearing 14 includes a platform 30 having an upper bearing surface 32 and a bottom surface 34. In the illustrative embodiment wherein the tibial bearing 14 is embodied as a rotating or mobile tibial bearing, the bearing 14 includes a stem 36 extending downwardly from the bottom surface 32 of the platform 30. When the tibial bearing 14 is coupled to the tibial tray 16, the stem 36 is received in the bore 26 of the tibial tray 16. In use, the tibial bearing 14 is configured to rotate about an axis defined by the stem 36 relative to the tibial tray 16. In embodiments wherein the tibial bearing 14 is embodied as a fixed tibial bearing, the bearing 14 may or may not include the stem 22 and/or may include other devices or features to secure the tibial bearing 14 to the tibial tray 12 in a non-rotating configuration.


The upper bearing surface 32 of the tibial bearing 14 includes a medial bearing surface 42 and a lateral bearing surface 44. The medial and lateral bearing surfaces 42, 44 are configured to receive or otherwise contact corresponding medial and lateral condyles of the femoral component 14 as discussed in more detail below. As such, each of the bearing surface 42, 44 has a concave contour.


The femoral component 12 is configured to be coupled to a surgically-prepared surface of the distal end of a patient's femur (not shown). The femoral component 12 may be secured to the patient's femur via use of bone adhesive or other attachment means. The femoral component 12 includes an outer, articulating surface 50 having a pair of medial and lateral condyles 52, 54. The condyles 52, 54 are spaced apart to define an intracondyle opening 56 therebetween. In use, the condyles 52, 54 replace the natural condyles of the patient's femur and are configured to articulate on the corresponding bearing surfaces 42, 44 of the platform 30 of the tibial bearing 14.


The illustrative orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 of FIG. 1 is embodied as a posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis. That is, the femoral component 12 is embodied as a posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis and the tibial bearing 14 is embodied as a posterior cruciate-retaining tibial bearing 14. However, in other embodiments, the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 may be embodied as a posterior cruciate-sacrificing knee prosthesis as illustrated in FIG. 2.


In such embodiments, the tibial bearing 14 is embodied as posterior stabilizing tibial bearing and includes a spine 60 extending upwardly from the platform 30. The spine 60 is positioned between the bearing surfaces 42, 44 and includes an anterior side 62 and a posterior side 64 having a cam surface 66. In the illustrative embodiment, the cam surface 66 has a substantially concave curvature. However, spines 60 including cam surfaces 66 having other geometries may be used in other embodiments. For example, a tibial bearing including a spine having a substantially “S”-shaped cross-sectional profile, such as the tibial bearing described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/165,582, entitled “Posterior Stabilized Orthopaedic Prosthesis” by Joseph G. Wyss, et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference, may be used in other embodiments.


Additionally, in such embodiments, the femoral component 12 is embodied as a posterior stabilized femoral component and includes an intracondyle notch or recess 57 (rather than an opening 56). A posterior cam 80 (shown in phantom) and an anterior cam 82 are positioned in the intracondyle notch 57. The posterior cam 80 is located toward the posterior side of the femoral component 12 and includes a cam surface 86 configured to engage or otherwise contact the cam surface 66 of the spine 60 of the tibial bearing 12 during.


It should be appreciated that although the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 may be embodied as either a posterior cruciate-retaining or cruciate-sacrificing knee prosthesis, the femoral component 12 and the tibial bearing 14 of the knee prosthesis 10 are discussed below, and illustrated in the remaining figures, in regard to a posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with the understanding that such description is equally applicable to those embodiments wherein orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is embodied as a posterior cruciate-sacrificing (posterior stabilized) orthopaedic knee prosthesis.


It should be appreciated that the illustrative orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is configured to replace a patient's right knee and, as such, the bearing surface 42 and the condyle 52 are referred to as being medially located; and the bearing surface 44 and the condyle 54 are referred to as being laterally located. However, in other embodiments, the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 may be configured to replace a patient's left knee. In such embodiments, it should be appreciated that the bearing surface 42 and the condyle 52 may be laterally located and the bearing surface 44 and the condyle 54 may be medially located. Regardless, the features and concepts described herein may be incorporated in an orthopaedic knee prosthesis configured to replace either knee joint of a patient.


Referring now to FIGS. 3-5, the femoral component 12 is configured to articulate on the tibial bearing 14 during use. Each condyle 52, 54 of the femoral component 12 includes a condyle surface 100, which is convexly curved in the sagittal plane and configured to contact the respective bearing surface 42, 44. For example, in one embodiment as shown in FIG. 3, when the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is in extension or is otherwise not in flexion (e.g., a flexion of about 0 degrees), the condyle surface 100 of the condyle 52 contacts the bearing surface 42 (or bearing surface 44 in regard to condyle 54) at one or more contact points 102 on the condyle surface 100.


Additionally, as the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is articulated through the middle degrees of flexion, the femoral component 12 contacts the tibial bearing 14 at one or more contact points on the condyle surface 100. For example, in one embodiment as illustrated in FIG. 4, when the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is articulated to a middle degree of flexion (e.g., at about 45 degrees), the condyle surface 100 contacts the bearing surface 42 at one or more contact points 104 on the condyle surface 100. Similarly, as the orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is articulated to a late degree of flexion (e.g., at about 70 degrees of flexion), the condyle surface 100 contacts the bearing surface 42 at one or more contact points 106 on the condyle surface 100 as illustrated in FIG. 5. It should be appreciated, of course, that the femoral component 12 may contact the tibial bearing 14 at a plurality of contact points on the condyle surface 100 at any one particular degree of flexion. However, for clarity of description, only the contact points 102, 104, 106 have been illustrated in FIGS. 3-5, respectively.


The orthopaedic knee prosthesis 10 is configured such that the amount of paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component 12 relative to the tibial bearing 14 may be reduced or otherwise delayed to a later (i.e., larger) degree of flexion. In particular, as discussed in more detail below, the condyle surface 100 of one or both of the condyles 52, 54 has particular geometry or curvature configured to reduce and/or delay anterior translations and, in some embodiments, promote “roll-back” or posterior translation, of the femoral component 12. It should be appreciated that by delaying the onset of paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component 12 to a larger degree of flexion, the overall occurrence of paradoxical anterior translation may be reduced during those activities of a patient in which deep flexion is not typically obtained.


In a typical orthopaedic knee prosthesis, paradoxical anterior translation may occur whenever the knee prosthesis is positioned at a degree of flexion greater than zero degrees. The likelihood of anterior translation generally increases as the orthopaedic knee prosthesis is articulated to larger degrees of flexion, particularly in the mid-flexion range. In such orientations, paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing can occur whenever the tangential (traction) force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing fails to satisfy the following equation:

T<μN  (1)


wherein “T” is the tangential (traction) force, “μ” is the coefficient of friction of the femoral component and the tibial bearing, and “N” is the normal force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing. As a generalization, the tangential (traction) force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing can be defined as

T=M/R  (2)


wherein “T” is the tangential (traction) force between the femoral component and the tibial bearing, “M” is the knee moment, and “R” is the radius of curvature in the sagittal plane of the condyle surface in contact with the tibial bearing at the particular degree of flexion. It should be appreciated that equation (2) is a simplification of the governing real-world equations, which does not consider such other factors as inertia and acceleration. Regardless, the equation (2) provides insight that paradoxical anterior translation of an orthopaedic knee prosthesis may be reduced or delayed by controlling the radius of curvature of the condyle surface of the femoral component. That is, by controlling the radius of curvature of the condyle surface (e.g., increasing or maintaining the radius of curvature), the right-hand side of equation (2) may be reduced, thereby decreasing the value of the tangential (traction) force and satisfying the equation (1). As discussed above, by ensuring that the tangential (traction) force satisfies equation (1), paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing may be reduced or otherwise delayed to a greater degree of flexion.


Based on the above analysis, to reduce or delay the onset of paradoxical anterior translation, the geometry of the condyle surface 100 of one or both of the condyles 52, 54 of the femoral component 12 is controlled. For example, in some embodiments, the radius of curvature of the condyle surface 100 is controlled such that the radius of curvature is held constant over a range of degrees of flexion and/or is increased in the early to mid flexion ranges. Comparatively, typical femoral components have decreasing radii of curvatures beginning at the distal radius of curvature (i.e., at about 0 degrees of flexion). However, it has been determined that by maintaining a relatively constant radius of curvature (i.e., not decreasing the radius of curvature) over a predetermined range of degrees of early to mid-flexion and/or increasing the radius of curvature over the predetermined range of degrees of flexion may reduce or delay paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component 12. Additionally, in some embodiments, the rate of change in the radius of curvature of the condyle surface in the early to mid flexion ranges (e.g., from about 0 degrees to about 90 degrees) is controlled such that the rate of change is less than a predetermined threshold. That is, it has been determined that if the rate of decrease of the radius of curvature of the condyle surface 100 is greater than the predetermined threshold, paradoxical anterior translation may occur.


Accordingly, in some embodiments as illustrated in FIGS. 6-8, the condyle surface 100 of the femoral component 12 has an increased radius of curvature in early to middle degrees of flexion from a smaller radius of curvature R1 to a larger radius of curvature R2. By increasing the radius of curvature, paradoxical anterior translation may be reduced or delayed to a later degree of flexion as discussed in more detail below.


The amount of increase between the radius of curvature R2 and the radius of curvature R3, as well as, the degree of flexion on the condyle surface 100 at which such increase occurs has been determined to affect the occurrence of paradoxical anterior translation. Multiple simulations of various femoral component designs were performed using the LifeMOD/Knee Sim, version 1007.1.0 Beta 16 software program, which is commercially available from LifeModeler, Inc. of San Clemente, Calif., to analyze the effect of increasing the radius of curvature of the condyle surface of the femoral components in early and mid flexion. Based on such analysis, it has been determined that paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component relative to the tibial bearing may be reduced or otherwise delayed by increasing the radius of curvature of the condyle surface by an amount in the range of about 0.5 millimeters to about 5 millimeters or more at a degree of flexion in the range of about 30 degrees of flexion to about 90 degrees of flexion.


For example, the graphs 200, 250 illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11 present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 0.5 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 25.5 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion. Similarly, the graphs 300, 350 illustrated in FIGS. 12 and 13 present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 1.0 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 26.0 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion. The graphs 400 and 450 illustrated in FIGS. 14 and 15 present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 2.0 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 27.0 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion. Additionally, the graphs 500, 550 illustrated in FIGS. 16 and 17 present the results of a deep bending knee simulation using a femoral component wherein the radius of curvature of the condyle surface is increased by 5.0 millimeters (i.e., from 25.0 millimeters to 26.0 millimeters) at 30 degrees of flexion, at 50 degrees of flexion, at 70 degrees of flexion, and at 90 degrees of flexion.


In the graphs 200, 300, 400, 500, the condylar lowest or most distal points (CLP) of the medial condyle (“med”) and the lateral condyle (“lat”) of the femoral component are graphed as a representation of the relative positioning of the femoral component to the tibial bearing. As such, a downwardly sloped line represents roll-back of the femoral component on the tibial bearing and an upwardly sloped line represents anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing. In the graphs 250, 350, 450, 550, the amount of relative internal-external rotation in degrees between the simulated femoral component and tibial bearing for each illustrative embodiment are graphed with respect to each degree of flexion. An upwardly sloped line in graphs 250, 350, 450, 550 corresponds to an amount of internal rotation of the tibia with respect to the femur (or external rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia).


As illustrated in the graphs 200, 300, 400, 500, anterior sliding of the femoral component was delayed until after about 100 degrees of flexion in each of the embodiments; and the amount of anterior translation was limited to less than about 1 millimeter. In particular, “roll-back” of the femoral component on the tibial bearing was promoted by larger increases in the radius of curvature of the condyle surface at earlier degrees of flexion. Additionally, as illustrated in graphs 250, 350, 450, 550, internal-external rotation between the femoral component and tibial bearing was increased by larger increases in the radius of curvature of the condyle surface at earlier degrees of flexion. Of course, amount of increase in the radius of curvature and the degree of flexion at which such increase is introduced is limited by other factors such as the anatomical joint space of the patient's knee, the size of the tibial bearing, and the like. Regardless, based on the simulations reported in the graphs 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component on the tibial bearing can be reduced or otherwise delayed by increasing the radius of curvature of the condyle surface of the femoral component during early to mid flexion.


Accordingly, referring back to FIGS. 6-9, the condyle surface 100 in the sagittal plane is formed in part from a number of curved surface sections 102, 104 in one embodiment. The sagittal ends of each curved surface section 102, 204 are tangent to the sagittal ends of any adjacent curved surface section of the condyles surface 100. Each curved surface section 102, 104 is defined by a respective radius of curvature. In particular, the curved surface section 102 is defined by a radius of curvature R1 and the curved surface section 104 is defined by a radius of curvature R2.


As discussed above, the condyle surface 100 of the femoral component 12 is configured such that the radius of curvature R2 of the curved surface section 104 is greater than the radius of curvature R1 of the curved surface section 102. In one embodiment, the radius of curvature R2 is greater than the radius of curvature R1 by 0.5 millimeters or more. In another embodiment, the radius of curvature R2 is greater than the radius of curvature R1 by 1 millimeters or more. Additionally in another embodiment, the radius of curvature R2 is greater than the radius of curvature R1 by 2 millimeters or more. In a particular embodiment, the radius of curvature R2 is greater than the radius of curvature R3 by a distance in the range of about 0.5 millimeters to about 5 millimeters.


It should be appreciated, however, that the particular increase of radius of curvature between R1 and R2 may be based on or scaled to the particular size of the femoral component 12 in some embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, the increase of the radius of curvature between R1 and R2 may be based on the size of R1. That is, the ratio of the radius of curvature R1 to the radius of curvature R2 may be below a predetermined threshold or within a specified range of a target value in some embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, the ratio of the radius of curvature R1 to the radius of curvature R2 is between 0.80 and 0.99. In one particular embodiment, the ratio of the radius of curvature R1 to the radius of curvature R2 is between 0.90 and 0.99.


Each of the curved surface sections 102, 104 contacts the bearing surface 42 (or 44) of the tibial bearing 14 through different ranges of degrees of flexion. For example, the curved surface section 102 extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1 to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section 104 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 to a later degree of flexion θ3. The particular degrees of flexion θ1, θ2, and θ3, may vary between embodiments and be based on criteria such as the type of orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized), positioning of other component of the orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., the positioning of a cam of the femoral component 12), the size of the femoral cam, the curvature of the tibial bearing 14, the anatomy of a patient, etc. For example, in one embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 6, the curved surface section 102 extends from a degree of flexion θ1 of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2 of about 30 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section 104 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 of about 30 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3 of about 110 degrees of flexion.


As discussed above, the particular degrees of flexion θ1, θ2, θ3 may be determined based on the particular embodiment and other features of the femoral component 12. For example, the larger degree of flexion θ3 may be determined or otherwise based on the desire to allow the most posterior-superior end 110 of the femoral component 12 to “wrap” around. Such a configuration may properly size or configure the femoral component 12 for positioning within the joint gap of a patient. The end 110 of the femoral component 12 may be formed from a number of additional radii of curvatures, which begin at the degree of flexion θ3. As such, the particular degree of flexion θ3 may be determined or based on the degree of flexion at which the additional radii of curvatures must begin to form the end 110 as desired.


In another embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 7, the curved surface section 102 extends from a degree of flexion θ1 of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2 of about 50 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section 104 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 of about 50 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3 of about 110 degrees of flexion. Additionally, in another embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 8, the curved surface section 102 extends from a degree of flexion θ1 of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2 of about 70 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section 104 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 of about 70 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3 of about 110 degrees of flexion. In another illustrative embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 9, the curved surface section 102 extends from a degree of flexion θ1 of about 0 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ2 of about 90 degrees of flexion. The curved surface section 104 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 of about 90 degrees of flexion to a degree of flexion θ3 of about 110 degrees of flexion.


Again, it should be appreciated that the embodiments of FIGS. 6-9 are illustrative embodiments and, in other embodiments, each of the curved surface sections 102, 104 may extend from degrees of flexion different from those shown and discussed above in regard to FIGS. 6-9. For example, in each of the embodiments of FIGS. 6-9, although the curved surface section 102 is illustrated as beginning at about 0 degrees of flexion, the curved surface section 102 may begin at a degree of flexion prior to 0 degrees of flexion (i.e., a degree of hyperextension) in other embodiments.


Referring now to FIG. 18, it should be appreciated that although the illustrative embodiments of FIGS. 6-9 include only one increase of radius of curvature (i.e., between R1 and R2), the condyle surface may include any number of increases in radius of curvature in other embodiments. For example, in one embodiment as shown in FIG. 18, the condyle surface 100 may be formed from a number of curved surface sections 600, 602, 604, 606, 608, the sagittal ends of each of which are tangent to adjacent curved surface sections. The curved surface section 600 extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1 to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section 602 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 to a later degree of flexion θ3. The curved surface section 604 extends from the degree of flexion θ3 to a later degree of flexion θ4. The curved surface section 606 extends from the degree of flexion θ4 to a later degree of flexion θ5. The curved surface section 608 extends from the degree of flexion θ5 to a later degree of flexion θ6.


Each of the curved surface sections 600, 602, 604, 606, 608 is defined by a respective radius of curvature. In particular, the curved surface section 600 is defined by a radius of curvature R1, the curved surface section 602 is defined by a radius of curvature R2, the curved surface section 604 is defined by a radius of curvature R3, the curved surface section 606 is defined by a radius of curvature R4, and the curved surface section 607 is defined by a radius of curvature R5. The radius of curvature R2 is greater than the radius of curvature R1. Similarly, the radius of curvature R3 is greater than the radius of curvature R2. The radius of curvature R4 is greater than the radius of curvature R3. And, the radius of curvature R5 is greater than the radius of curvature R4. In this way, the condyle surface 100 is formed from a plurality of curved surface sections, each having a radius of curvature greater than the adjacent anterior curved surface section. Again, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 18 is just one illustrative embodiment. In other embodiments, the condyle surface 100 may be formed from a greater or lesser number of curved surface sections having an increased radius of curvature relative to an anteriorly adjacent curved surface section.


Referring now to FIG. 19, the condyle surface 100 may include an increase in radius of curvature and a decrease in radius of curvature in the early to middle degrees of flexion. That is, in some embodiments, the radius of curvature of the condyle surface 100 may initially increase from an initial radius of curvature to an increased radius of curvature and subsequently decrease to a decreased radius of curvature that is larger than the initial radius prior to late flexion (e.g., prior to about 90 degrees of flexion).


For example, in one embodiment shown in FIG. 19, the condyle surface 100 be formed from a number of curved surface sections 700, 702, 704, the sagittal ends of each of which are tangent to adjacent curved surface sections. The curved surface section 700 extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1 to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section 72 extends from the degree of flexion θ2 to a later degree of flexion θ3. The curved surface section 704 extends from the degree of flexion θ3 to a later degree of flexion θ4.


Each of the curved surface sections 700, 702, 704 is defined by a respective radius of curvature. In particular, the curved surface section 700 is defined by a radius of curvature R1, the curved surface section 6702 is defined by a radius of curvature R2, and the curved surface section 704 is defined by a radius of curvature R3. The radius of curvature R2 is greater than the radius of curvature R1. The radius of curvature R3 is less than the radius of curvature R2 and greater than the radius of curvature R1. In this way, the radius of curvature of the condyle surface 100 initially increases from R1 to R2 and subsequently decreases to R3. However, because R3 is still greater than the distal radius R1, paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component 12 may be reduced or delayed as discussed in detail above.


Additionally, as discussed above, the particular amount of increase between R1 and R2 and between R1 and R3 may vary between embodiments and be based on one or more of a number of various criteria such as, for example, the type of orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized), positioning of other component of the orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., the positioning of a cam of the femoral component 12), the size of the femoral cam, the curvature of the tibial bearing 14, the anatomy of a patient, etc. In one particular embodiment, each of the radius of curvature R2, R3 is greater than the radius of curvature R1 by at least 0.5 millimeters.


Referring now to FIG. 20, another way to control the radius of curvature of the condyle surface 100 is to maintain the radius of curvature through early to middle degrees of flexion. As discussed above, typical femoral components have decreasing radii of curvatures beginning at the distal radius of curvature (i.e., at about 0 degrees of flexion). However, it has been determined that maintaining a relatively constant radius of curvature (i.e., not decreasing the radius of curvature) over a predetermined range of degrees of early to mid-flexion may reduce or delay paradoxical anterior translation of the femoral component 12.


Accordingly, in one embodiment as shown in FIG. 20, the condyle surface 100 may be formed from a curved surface section 800. The curved surface section 800 extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ1 to a later degree of flexion θ2. The curved surface section 800 is defined by a constant or substantially constant radius of curvature R1. In the illustrative embodiment, the curved surface section 800 subtends an angle of about 110 degrees, but may be larger or small in other embodiments. For example, in one particular embodiment, the curved surface section 800 subtends an angle of at least 50 degrees. Additionally, as discussed above, the particular degrees of flexion θ1, θ2 may be based on one or more of a number of various criteria such as, for example, the type of orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized), positioning of other component of the orthopaedic prosthesis (e.g., the positioning of a cam of the femoral component 12), the size of the femoral cam, the curvature of the tibial bearing 14, the anatomy of a patient, etc.


The overall shape and design of the condyle surface 100 of the femoral component 12 has been described above in regard to a single condyle 52, 54 of the femoral component 12. It should be appreciated that in some embodiments both condyles 52, 54 of the femoral component 12 may be symmetrical and have similar condyle surfaces 100. However, in other embodiments, the condyles 52, 54 of the femoral component 12 may asymmetrical. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 21, the femoral component 12 may include a second condyle 52, 54 having a condyle surface 900, which is defined in part by a plurality of curved surface sections 902, 904. The curved surface section 902 extends from an earlier degree of flexion θ4 to a later degree of flexion θ5. The curved surface section 904 extends from the degree of flexion θ5 to a later degree of flexion θ6. The curved surface section 902 is defined by a radius of curvature R3 and the curved surface section 904 is defined by a radius of curvature R4.


As such, in embodiments wherein the condyles 52, 54 are symmetrical, the degree of flexion θ4 is substantially equal to the degree of flexion θ1, the degree of flexion θ5 is substantially equal to the degree of flexion θ2, and the degree of flexion θ6 is substantially equal to the degree of flexion θ3. Additionally, the radius of curvature R3 is substantially equal to the radius of curvature R1 and the radius of curvature R4 is substantially equal to the radius of curvature R2.


However, in other embodiments, the condyles 52, 54 are asymmetrical. As such, the degree of flexion θ4 may be different from the degree of flexion θ1. Additionally or alternatively, the degree of flexion θ5 may be different from the degree of flexion θ2. That is, the increase in radius of curvature from R1 to R2 and from R3 to R4 may occur at different degrees of flexion between the condyles 52, 54. Further, the degree of flexion θ6 may be different from the degree of flexion θ3. Additionally, in those embodiments wherein the condyles 52, 54 are asymmetrical, the radius of curvature R3 may be different from the radius of curvature R1 and/or the radius of curvature R4 may be different from the radius of curvature R2.


While the disclosure has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such an illustration and description is to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only illustrative embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the disclosure are desired to be protected.


There are a plurality of advantages of the present disclosure arising from the various features of the devices and assemblies described herein. It will be noted that alternative embodiments of the devices and assemblies of the present disclosure may not include all of the features described yet still benefit from at least some of the advantages of such features. Those of ordinary skill in the art may readily devise their own implementations of the devices and assemblies that incorporate one or more of the features of the present invention and fall within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An orthopaedic knee prosthesis comprising: a femoral component having a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane; anda tibial bearing having a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component,wherein the condyle surface (i) contacts the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion less than about 30 degrees, (ii) contacts the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion, (iii) contacts the bearing surface at a third contact point on the condyle surface at a third degree of flexion, and (iv) contacts the bearing surface at a fourth contact point on the condyle surface at a fourth degree of flexion, wherein the second degree of flexion is greater than the first degree of flexion, the third degree of flexion is greater than the second degree of flexion, and the fourth degree of flexion is greater than the third degree of flexion,wherein the condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a first radius of curvature at the first contact point, a second radius of curvature at the second contact point, a third radius of curvature of the third contact point, and a fourth radius of curvature of the fourth contact point, andwherein (i) the second radius of curvature is greater than the first radius of curvature, (ii) the third radius of curvature is greater than each of the first radius of curvature and the second radius of curvature, and (iii) the fourth radius of curvature is greater than the first radius of curvature and less than each of the second radius of curvature and the third radius of curvature such that a curved surface section having a non-constant radius of curvature is defined between the first contact point and the fourth contact point.
  • 2. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 1, wherein each of the second, third, and fourth radius of curvature is greater than first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 3. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 2, wherein the third radius of curvature is greater than the second radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 4. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 1, wherein each of the first and second radius of curvature is greater than the fourth radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 5. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the fourth degree of flexion is less than about 90 degrees.
  • 6. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the second degree of flexion is in the range of 10 degrees to 75 degrees.
  • 7. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 6, wherein the fourth degree of flexion is less than about 90 degrees.
  • 8. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 1, wherein a ratio of the first radius of curvature to the second radius of curvature is in the range of 0.5 to 0.99.
  • 9. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 1, wherein: (i) the condyle surface of the femoral component is a medial condyle surface and the bearing surface of the tibial bearing is a medial bearing surface,(ii) the femoral component further includes a lateral condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane, and(iii) the tibial bearing further includes a lateral bearing surface configured to articulate with the lateral condyle surface of the femoral component.
  • 10. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 9, wherein the lateral condyle surface (i) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a first contact point on the lateral condyle surface at a fifth degree of flexion less than about 30 degrees, (ii) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a second contact point on the lateral condyle surface at a sixth degree of flexion, (iii) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a third contact point on the lateral condyle surface at a seventh degree of flexion, and (iv) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a fourth contact point on the lateral condyle surface at an eighth degree of flexion, wherein the sixth degree of flexion is greater than the fifth degree of flexion, the seventh degree of flexion is greater than the sixth degree of flexion, and the eighth degree of flexion is greater than the seventh degree of flexion, andwherein (i) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a first radius of curvature at the first contact point on the lateral condyle surface, (ii) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a second radius of curvature at the second contact point on the lateral condyle surface, (iii) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a third radius of curvature at the third contact point on the lateral condyle surface, and (iv) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a fourth radius of curvature at the fourth contact point on the lateral condyle surface,wherein (i) the second radius of curvature of the lateral condyle is greater than the first radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface, (ii) the third radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface is greater than each of the first radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface and the second radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface, and (iii) the fourth radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface is greater than the first radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface and less than each of the second radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface and the third radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface.
  • 11. An orthopaedic knee prosthesis comprising: a femoral component having a condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane; anda tibial bearing having a bearing surface configured to articulate with the condyle surface of the femoral component,wherein the condyle surface (i) contacts the bearing surface at a first contact point on the condyle surface at a first degree of flexion less than about 30 degrees, (ii) contacts the bearing surface at a second contact point on the condyle surface at a second degree of flexion greater than the first degree of flexion, and (iii) contacts the bearing surface at a plurality of contact points on the condyle surface through a range of flexion between the first degree of flexion and the second degree of flexion,wherein the condyle surface in the sagittal plane has (i) a first radius of curvature at the first contact point, (ii) a second radius of curvature at the second contact point, and (iii) a plurality of radii of curvature between the first radius of curvature and the second radius of curvature, wherein each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature corresponds to a different contact point of the plurality of contact points, andwherein (i) each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature is greater than a radius of curvature of the condyle surface that is anteriorly adjacent to the corresponding radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature and (iii) the second radius of curvature greater than the first radius of curvature and less than each of the radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature.
  • 12. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 11, wherein each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature is greater than the radius of curvature of the condyle surface that is anteriorly adjacent to the corresponding radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 13. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 12, wherein each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature is greater than the first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 14. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 13, wherein each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature is greater than the second radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 15. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 14, wherein the second degree of flexion is less than about 90 degrees.
  • 16. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 15, wherein the second degree of flexion is less than about 90 degrees.
  • 17. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 11, wherein the second radius of curvature is greater than first radius of curvature by at least 0.5 millimeters.
  • 18. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 11, wherein: (i) the condyle surface of the femoral component is a medial condyle surface and the bearing surface of the tibial bearing is a medial bearing surface,(ii) the femoral component further includes a lateral condyle surface curved in the sagittal plane, and(iii) the tibial bearing further includes a lateral bearing surface configured to articulate with the lateral condyle surface of the femoral component.
  • 19. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 18, wherein the lateral condyle surface (i) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a first contact point on the lateral condyle surface at a third degree of flexion of less than about 30 degrees, (ii) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a second contact point on the lateral condyle surface at a fourth degree of flexion greater than the second degree of flexion, and (iii) contacts the lateral bearing surface at a plurality of contact points on the lateral condyle surface through a range of flexion between the third degree of flexion and the fourth degree of flexion,wherein (i) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a first radius of curvature at the first contact point, (ii) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane a second radius of curvature at the second contact point, and (iii) the lateral condyle surface in the sagittal plane has a plurality of radii of curvature between the first radius of curvature and the second radius of curvature, wherein each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature of the lateral condyle surface corresponds to a different contact point of the plurality of contact points of the lateral condyle surface, andwherein (i) each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature of the lateral condyle surface is greater than a radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface that is anteriorly adjacent to the corresponding radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature of the lateral condyle surface and (ii) the second radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface is greater than the first radius of curvature of the lateral condyle surface and less than each radius of curvature of the plurality of radii of curvature of the lateral condyle surface.
  • 20. The orthopaedic knee prosthesis of claim 19, wherein the third degree of flexion is different from the first degree of flexion and the fourth degree of flexion is different from the second degree of flexion.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED U.S. PATENT APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/943,798, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,543,098, entitled “ORTHOPAEDIC FEMORAL COMPONENT HAVING CONTROLLED CONDYLAR CURVATURE,” which is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 14/983,079, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,931,216, entitled “ORTHOPAEDIC FEMORAL COMPONENT HAVING CONTROLLED CONDYLAR CURVATURE,” which is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 14/453,371 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,220,601 entitled “ORTHOPAEDIC FEMORAL COMPONENT HAVING CONTROLLED CONDYLAR CURVATURE,” which is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,579, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,828,086 entitled “ORTHOPAEDIC FEMORAL COMPONENT HAVING CONTROLLED CONDYLAR CURVATURE,” the entirety of each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Cross-reference is made to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,574, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,498, entitled “Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Orthopaedic Knee Prosthesis Having Controlled Condylar Curvature” by Christel M. Wagner, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2008; to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,575, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,335, entitled “Posterior Stabilized Orthopaedic Knee Prosthesis Having Controlled Condylar Curvature” by Joseph G. Wyss, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2008; and to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/165,582, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,206,451, entitled “Posterior Stabilized Orthopaedic Prosthesis” by Joseph G. Wyss, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2008; and to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/488,107, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,236,061, entitled “Orthopaedic Knee Prosthesis Having Controlled Condylar Curvature” by Mark A. Heldreth, which was filed on Jun. 19, 2009; the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (385)
Number Name Date Kind
3765033 Goldberg et al. Oct 1973 A
3840905 Deane Oct 1974 A
3852045 Wheeler et al. Dec 1974 A
3855638 Pilliar Dec 1974 A
3869731 Waugh et al. Mar 1975 A
4081866 Upshaw et al. Apr 1978 A
4156943 Collier Jun 1979 A
4206516 Pilliar Jun 1980 A
4209861 Walker et al. Jul 1980 A
4215439 Gold et al. Aug 1980 A
4249270 Bahler et al. Feb 1981 A
4257129 Volz Mar 1981 A
4262368 Lacey Apr 1981 A
1309778 Buechel et al. Jan 1982 A
4340978 Buechel et al. Jul 1982 A
4470158 Pappas et al. Sep 1984 A
4612160 Donlevy et al. Sep 1986 A
4673407 Martin Jun 1987 A
4714474 Brooks et al. Dec 1987 A
4795468 Hodorek et al. Jan 1989 A
4808185 Penenberg et al. Feb 1989 A
4822362 Walker et al. Apr 1989 A
4838891 Branemark et al. Jun 1989 A
4888021 Forte et al. Dec 1989 A
4938769 Shaw Jul 1990 A
4944757 Martinez et al. Jul 1990 A
4944760 Kenna Jul 1990 A
4950298 Gustilo et al. Aug 1990 A
4963152 Hofmann et al. Oct 1990 A
4990163 Ducheyne et al. Feb 1991 A
5007933 Sidebotham et al. Apr 1991 A
5011496 Forte et al. Apr 1991 A
5019103 Van Zile et al. May 1991 A
5037423 Kenna Aug 1991 A
5071438 Jones et al. Dec 1991 A
5080675 Ashby et al. Jan 1992 A
5104410 Chowdhary Apr 1992 A
5108442 Smith Apr 1992 A
5116375 Hofmann May 1992 A
5133758 Hollister Jul 1992 A
5147405 Van Zile et al. Sep 1992 A
5171283 Pappas et al. Dec 1992 A
5201766 Georgette Apr 1993 A
5219362 Tuke et al. Jun 1993 A
5236461 Forte Aug 1993 A
5251468 Lin et al. Oct 1993 A
5258044 Lee Nov 1993 A
5271737 Baldwin et al. Dec 1993 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5308556 Bagley May 1994 A
5309639 Lee May 1994 A
5326361 Hollister Jul 1994 A
5330533 Walker Jul 1994 A
5330534 Herrington et al. Jul 1994 A
5344460 Turanyi et al. Sep 1994 A
5344461 Phlipot Sep 1994 A
5344494 Davidson et al. Sep 1994 A
5358527 Forte Oct 1994 A
5368881 Kelman et al. Nov 1994 A
5370699 Hood et al. Dec 1994 A
5387240 Pottenger et al. Feb 1995 A
5395401 Bahler Mar 1995 A
5405396 Heldreth et al. Apr 1995 A
5413604 Hodge May 1995 A
5414049 Sun et al. May 1995 A
5449745 Sun et al. Sep 1995 A
5458637 Hayes Oct 1995 A
5480446 Goodfellow et al. Jan 1996 A
5543471 Sun et al. Aug 1996 A
5549686 Johnson et al. Aug 1996 A
5571187 Devanathan Nov 1996 A
5571194 Gabriel Nov 1996 A
5609639 Walker Mar 1997 A
5609643 Colleran et al. Mar 1997 A
5639279 Burkinshaw et al. Jun 1997 A
5650485 Sun et al. Jul 1997 A
5658333 Kelman et al. Aug 1997 A
5658342 Draganich et al. Aug 1997 A
5658344 Hurlburt Aug 1997 A
5681354 Eckhoff Oct 1997 A
5683468 Pappas Nov 1997 A
5702458 Burstein et al. Dec 1997 A
5702463 Pothier et al. Dec 1997 A
5702464 Lackey et al. Dec 1997 A
5702466 Pappas et al. Dec 1997 A
5725584 Walker et al. Mar 1998 A
5728748 Sun et al. Mar 1998 A
5732469 Hamamoto et al. Mar 1998 A
5755800 O'Neil et al. May 1998 A
5755801 Walker et al. May 1998 A
5755803 Haines et al. May 1998 A
5765095 Flak et al. Jun 1998 A
5766257 Goodman et al. Jun 1998 A
5776201 Colleran et al. Jul 1998 A
5800552 Forte Sep 1998 A
5811543 Hao et al. Sep 1998 A
5824096 Pappas et al. Oct 1998 A
5824100 Kester et al. Oct 1998 A
5824102 Buscayret Oct 1998 A
5824103 Williams Oct 1998 A
5871543 Hofmann Feb 1999 A
5871545 Goodfellow et al. Feb 1999 A
5871546 Colleran et al. Feb 1999 A
5879394 Ashby et al. Mar 1999 A
5879400 Merrill et al. Mar 1999 A
5906644 Powell May 1999 A
5935173 Roger et al. Aug 1999 A
5951603 O'Neil et al. Sep 1999 A
5957979 Beckman et al. Sep 1999 A
5964808 Blaha et al. Oct 1999 A
5976147 Lasalle et al. Nov 1999 A
5984969 Matthews et al. Nov 1999 A
5989027 Wagner et al. Nov 1999 A
5997577 Herrington et al. Dec 1999 A
6004351 Tomita et al. Dec 1999 A
6005018 Cicierega et al. Dec 1999 A
6010534 O'Neil et al. Jan 2000 A
6013103 Kaufman et al. Jan 2000 A
6017975 Saum et al. Jan 2000 A
6039764 Pottenger et al. Mar 2000 A
6042780 Huang Mar 2000 A
6053945 O'Neil et al. Apr 2000 A
6059949 Gal-Or et al. May 2000 A
6068658 Insall et al. May 2000 A
6080195 Colleran et al. Jun 2000 A
6090144 Letot et al. Jul 2000 A
6123728 Brosnahan et al. Sep 2000 A
6123729 Insall et al. Sep 2000 A
6123896 Meeks et al. Sep 2000 A
6126692 Robie et al. Oct 2000 A
6135857 Shaw et al. Oct 2000 A
6139581 Engh et al. Oct 2000 A
6152960 Pappas Nov 2000 A
6162254 Timoteo Dec 2000 A
6174934 Sun et al. Jan 2001 B1
6206926 Pappas Mar 2001 B1
6210444 Webster et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210445 Zawadzk Apr 2001 B1
6217618 Hileman Apr 2001 B1
6228900 Shen et al. May 2001 B1
6238434 Pappas May 2001 B1
6242507 Saum et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245276 McNulty et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258127 Schmotzer Jul 2001 B1
6264697 Walker Jul 2001 B1
6280476 Metzger et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281264 Salovey et al. Aug 2001 B1
6299646 Chambat et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316158 Saum et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319283 Insall et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325828 Dennis et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344059 Krakovits et al. Feb 2002 B1
6361564 Marceaux et al. Mar 2002 B1
6372814 Sun et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379388 Ensign et al. Apr 2002 B1
6428577 Evans et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443991 Running Sep 2002 B1
6475241 Pappas Nov 2002 B2
6485519 Meyers et al. Nov 2002 B2
6491726 Pappas Dec 2002 B2
6494914 Brown et al. Dec 2002 B2
6503280 Repicci Jan 2003 B2
6506215 Letot et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506216 McCue et al. Jan 2003 B1
6524522 Vaidyanathan et al. Feb 2003 B2
6540787 Biegun et al. Apr 2003 B2
6558426 Masini May 2003 B1
6569202 Whiteside May 2003 B2
6582469 Tornier Jun 2003 B1
6582470 Lee et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589283 Metzger et al. Jul 2003 B1
6592787 Pickrell et al. Jul 2003 B2
6620198 Burstein et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623526 Lloyd Sep 2003 B1
6645251 Salehi et al. Nov 2003 B2
6660039 Evans et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660224 Lefebvre et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664308 Sun et al. Dec 2003 B2
6702821 Bonutti Mar 2004 B2
6719800 Meyers et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726724 Repicci Apr 2004 B2
6730128 Burstein May 2004 B2
6764516 Pappas Jul 2004 B2
6770078 Bonutti Aug 2004 B2
6770099 Andriacchi et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773461 Meyers et al. Aug 2004 B2
6797005 Pappas Sep 2004 B2
6818020 Sun et al. Nov 2004 B2
6846327 Khandkar et al. Jan 2005 B2
6846329 McMinn Jan 2005 B2
6849230 Feichtinger Feb 2005 B1
6852272 Artz et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869448 Tuke et al. Mar 2005 B2
6893388 Reising et al. May 2005 B2
6893467 Bercovy May 2005 B1
6916340 Metzger et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923832 Sharkey et al. Aug 2005 B1
6926738 Wyss Aug 2005 B2
6942670 Heldreth et al. Sep 2005 B2
6972039 Metzger et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986791 Metzger Jan 2006 B1
7025788 Metzger et al. Apr 2006 B2
7048741 Swanson May 2006 B2
7066963 Naegerl Jun 2006 B2
7070622 Brown et al. Jul 2006 B1
7081137 Servidio Jul 2006 B1
7094259 Tarabichi Aug 2006 B2
7101401 Brack Sep 2006 B2
7104996 Bonutti Sep 2006 B2
7105027 Lipman et al. Sep 2006 B2
7147819 Bram et al. Dec 2006 B2
7160330 Axelson, Jr. et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175665 German et al. Feb 2007 B2
7255715 Metzger Aug 2007 B2
7258701 Aram et al. Aug 2007 B2
7261740 Tuttle et al. Aug 2007 B2
7297164 Johnson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7326252 Otto et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341602 Fell et al. Mar 2008 B2
7344460 Gait Mar 2008 B2
7357817 D'Alessio, II Apr 2008 B2
7422605 Burstein et al. Sep 2008 B2
7510557 Bonutti Mar 2009 B1
7527650 Johnson et al. May 2009 B2
7572292 Crabtree et al. Aug 2009 B2
7578850 Kuczynski et al. Aug 2009 B2
7608079 Blackwell et al. Oct 2009 B1
7611519 Lefevre et al. Nov 2009 B2
7615054 Bonutti Nov 2009 B1
7618462 Ek Nov 2009 B2
7628818 Hazebrouck et al. Dec 2009 B2
7635390 Bonutti Dec 2009 B1
7658767 Wyss Feb 2010 B2
7678151 Ek Mar 2010 B2
7678152 Suguro et al. Mar 2010 B2
7708740 Bonutti May 2010 B1
7708741 Bonutti May 2010 B1
7740662 Barnett et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749229 Bonutti Jul 2010 B1
7753960 Cipolletti et al. Jul 2010 B2
7771484 Campbell Aug 2010 B2
7776044 Pendleton et al. Aug 2010 B2
7806896 Bonutti Oct 2010 B1
7806897 Bonutti Oct 2010 B1
7837736 Bonutti Nov 2010 B2
7842093 Peters et al. Nov 2010 B2
7875081 Lipman et al. Jan 2011 B2
7922771 Otto et al. Apr 2011 B2
8206451 Wyss et al. Jun 2012 B2
8236061 Heldreth et al. Aug 2012 B2
9204968 Wyss et al. Dec 2015 B2
9220601 Williams et al. Dec 2015 B2
9326864 Wyss et al. May 2016 B2
9452053 Wagner et al. Sep 2016 B2
9539099 Heldreth et al. Jan 2017 B2
9931216 Williams et al. Apr 2018 B2
9937049 Wyss et al. Apr 2018 B2
10179051 Heldreth et al. Jan 2019 B2
10265180 Wyss et al. Apr 2019 B2
10543098 Williams et al. Jan 2020 B2
10729551 Heldreth et al. Aug 2020 B2
20020138150 Leclercq Sep 2002 A1
20030009232 Metzger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030035747 Anderson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030044301 Lefebvre et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030075013 Grohowski Apr 2003 A1
20030139817 Tuke et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030153981 Wang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171820 Wilshaw et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199985 Masini Oct 2003 A1
20030212161 McKellop et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225456 Ek Dec 2003 A1
20040015770 Kimoto Jan 2004 A1
20040039450 Griner et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040167633 Wen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040186583 Keller Sep 2004 A1
20040215345 Perrone, Jr. et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040243244 Otto et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040243245 Plumet et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021147 Tarabichi Jan 2005 A1
20050055102 Tornier et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059750 Sun et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069629 Becker et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050096747 Tuttle et al. May 2005 A1
20050100578 Schmid et al. May 2005 A1
20050123672 Justin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143832 Carson Jun 2005 A1
20050154472 Afriat Jul 2005 A1
20050203631 Daniels et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209701 Suguro et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209702 Todd et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050249625 Bram et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278035 Wyss et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002810 Grohowski Jan 2006 A1
20060015185 Chambat et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060036329 Webster et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052875 Bernero et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060100714 Ensign May 2006 A1
20060178749 Pendleton et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195195 Burstein et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060228247 Grohowski Oct 2006 A1
20060231402 Clasen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241781 Brown et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060257358 Wen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271191 Hermansson Nov 2006 A1
20060289388 Yang et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070061014 Naegerl Mar 2007 A1
20070073409 Cooney et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078521 Overholser et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100463 Aram et al. May 2007 A1
20070129809 Meridew et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135926 Walker Jun 2007 A1
20070173948 Meridew et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070196230 Hamman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203582 Campbell Aug 2007 A1
20070219639 Otto et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070293647 McKellop et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080004708 Wyss Jan 2008 A1
20080021566 Peters et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080091272 Aram et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097616 Meyers et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080114462 Guidera et al. May 2008 A1
20080114464 Barnett et al. May 2008 A1
20080119940 Otto et al. May 2008 A1
20080161927 Savage et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195108 Bhatnagar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080199720 Liu Aug 2008 A1
20080206297 Roeder et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080269596 Revie et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090043396 Komistek Feb 2009 A1
20090048680 Naegerl Feb 2009 A1
20090082873 Hazebrouck et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084491 Uthgenannt et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090088859 Hazebrouck et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125114 May et al. May 2009 A1
20090192610 Case et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090265012 Engh et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265013 Mandell Oct 2009 A1
20090292365 Smith et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090295035 Evans Dec 2009 A1
20090306785 Farrar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319047 Walker Dec 2009 A1
20090326663 Dun Dec 2009 A1
20090326664 Wagner et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326665 Wyss et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326666 Wyss et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326667 Williams et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326674 Liu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100016979 Wyss et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100036499 Pinskerova Feb 2010 A1
20100036500 Heldreth et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042224 Otto et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042225 Shur Feb 2010 A1
20100063594 Hazebrouck et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070045 Ek Mar 2010 A1
20100076563 Otto et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076564 Schilling et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094429 Otto Apr 2010 A1
20100098574 Liu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100189 Metzger Apr 2010 A1
20100100190 May et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100191 May et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125337 Grecco et al. May 2010 A1
20100161067 Saleh et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191341 Byrd Jul 2010 A1
20100222890 Barnett et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100286788 Komistek Nov 2010 A1
20100292804 Samuelson Nov 2010 A1
20100305710 Metzger et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100312350 Bonutti Dec 2010 A1
20110029090 Zannis et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110029092 Deruntz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110035017 Deffenbaugh et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110035018 Deffenbaugh et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110106268 Deffenbaugh et al. May 2011 A1
20110118847 Lipman et al. May 2011 A1
20110125280 Otto et al. May 2011 A1
20110153026 Heggendorn et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120239158 Wagner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120259417 Wyss et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271428 Heldreth et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120296437 Wyss et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130006372 Wyss et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130006373 Wyss et al. Jan 2013 A1
20190247194 Wyss et al. Aug 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (76)
Number Date Country
1803106 Jul 2006 CN
1872009 Dec 2006 CN
1972646 May 2010 CN
4308563 Sep 1994 DE
19529824 Feb 1997 DE
0495340 Jul 1992 EP
0634155 Jan 1995 EP
0634156 Jan 1995 EP
0636352 Feb 1995 EP
0732091 Sep 1996 EP
0732092 Sep 1996 EP
0765645 Apr 1997 EP
0510178 Feb 1998 EP
1129676 Sep 2001 EP
0883388 Nov 2001 EP
1226799 Jul 2002 EP
1374805 Jan 2004 EP
1421918 May 2004 EP
1440675 Jul 2004 EP
1196118 Oct 2004 EP
1470801 Oct 2004 EP
1518521 Mar 2005 EP
1591082 Nov 2005 EP
1779812 May 2007 EP
1923079 May 2008 EP
2649965 Oct 2016 EP
2417971 Sep 1979 FR
2621243 Apr 1989 FR
2653992 May 1991 FR
2780636 Jan 2000 FR
2787012 Jun 2000 FR
2809302 Nov 2001 FR
2835178 Aug 2003 FR
1065354 Apr 1967 GB
2293109 Mar 1996 GB
2335145 Sep 1999 GB
S56083343 Jul 1981 JP
62205201 Sep 1987 JP
H08500992 Feb 1996 JP
H08503407 Apr 1996 JP
08224263 Sep 1996 JP
2002291779 Oct 2002 JP
2004167255 Jun 2004 JP
2006015133 Jan 2006 JP
2008062030 Mar 2008 JP
2009501393 Jan 2009 JP
2010012261 Jan 2010 JP
7900739 Oct 1979 WO
8100784 Mar 1981 WO
8906947 Aug 1989 WO
9014806 Dec 1990 WO
9601725 Jan 1996 WO
9623458 Aug 1996 WO
9624311 Aug 1996 WO
9624312 Aug 1996 WO
9846171 Oct 1998 WO
9927872 Jun 1999 WO
9966864 Dec 1999 WO
0209624 Feb 2002 WO
03039609 May 2003 WO
03101647 Dec 2003 WO
2004058108 Jul 2004 WO
2004069104 Aug 2004 WO
2005009489 Feb 2005 WO
2005009729 Feb 2005 WO
2005072657 Aug 2005 WO
2005087125 Sep 2005 WO
2006014294 Feb 2006 WO
2006130350 Dec 2006 WO
2007106172 Sep 2007 WO
2007108804 Sep 2007 WO
2007119173 Oct 2007 WO
2009046212 Apr 2009 WO
2009128943 Oct 2009 WO
2013003433 Jan 2013 WO
2013003435 Jan 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (94)
Entry
Ries, “Effect of ACL Sacrifice, Retention, or Substitution on K After TKA,” http://www.orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=23134, Aug. 2007, 5 pgs.
Zimmer Nexgen Trabecular Metal Tibial Tray, The Best Thing Next to Bone, 97-5954-001-00, 2007, 4 pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 08253140.1-2310, dated Dec. 23, 2008, 7 pgs.
Koo, et al., “The Knee Joint Center of Rotation Is Predominantly on the Lateral Side During Normal Walking”, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41 (2008): 1269-1273, 5 Pages.
“NexGen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining Knee (CR),” Zimmer, available at: http://zimmer.com.au/ctl?template=PC&op=global&action=&template=PC&id=356- , downloaded on Feb. 18, 2009, (1 page).
“Vanguard Complete Knee System,” Biomet, available at: http://www.biomet.com/patients/vanguard_complete.cfm, downloaded on Feb. 2009, (3 pages).
Biomet, Vanguard Mono-Lock Tibial System, Patented Convertible Tibial Bearing Technology, 2009, 2 Pages.
European Patent Office, Search Report for App. No. 09164479.9-2310, dated Nov. 4, 2009, 6 pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 08164944.4-2310-2042131, dated Mar. 16, 2009, 12 pgs.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164235.5-1526, dated Dec. 22, 2009, 6 pgs.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164245.4-2310, dated Oct. 15, 2009, 5 pgs.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164478.1-2310, dated Oct. 20, 2009, 6 Pages.
Japanese Search Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-501393, dated Oct. 26, 2010, 5 Pages.
Karachalios, et al., “A Mid-Term Clinical Outcome Study of the Advance Medial Pivot Knee Arthroplasty”, www.sciencedirect.come, The Knee 16 (2009); 484-488, 5 Pages.
Mannan, et al., “The Medical Rotation Total Knee Replacement: A Clinical and Radiological Review at a Mean Follow-Up of Six Years”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91-B, No. 6 (Jun. 2009): 750-756, 7 Pages.
Moonot, et al., “Correlation Between the Oxford Knee and American Knee Society Scores at Mid-Term Follow-Up”, The Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 22, No. 3 (Jul. 2009), 226-230, 5 Page.
Omori, et al., “The Effect of Geometry of the Tibial Polyethylene Insert on the Tibiofemoral Contact Kinematics in Advance Medical Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty”, The Journal of Orthopaedics Science (2009), 14:754-760, 7 Pages.
Zimmer, Trabecular Metal Monoblock Tibial Components, An Optimal Combination of Material and Design, www.zimmer.com, 2009, 3 pages.
Barnes, C.L., et al, “Kneeling Is Safe for Patients Implanted With Medical-Pivot Total Knee Arthoplasty Designs, Journal of Arthoplasty”, vol. 00, No. 0 2010, 1-6, 6 Pages.
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., “Sigma Fixed Bearing Knees—Function with Wear Resistance”, 2010, 0612-65-508 (Rev. 1) 20 pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 06739287.8-2310, dated Mar. 16, 2010, 3 Pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164160.5-1526, dated Jan. 4, 2010, 4 pgs.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164168.8-1526, dated Jan. 4, 2010, 6 pgs.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164228.0-1526, dated Feb. 2, 2010, 6 pgs.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09164478.1-2310, dated Apr. 28, 2010, 12 Pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 10162138.1, dated Aug. 30, 2010, 7 Pages.
European Search Report, European Application No. 10174439.9-1526, dated Dec. 20, 2010, 4 pages.
Fan, Cheng-Yu, et al., “Primitive Results After Medical-Pivot Knee Arthroplasties: A Minimum 5 Year Follow-Up Study”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 25, No. 3 2010, 492-496, 5 Pages.
Depuy Knees International, “Sigma CR Porocoat.RTM.,” 1 page, (downloaded May 12, 2011).
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11150648.1-2310, dated Apr. 7, 2011, 4 pages.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11150648.1-2310, dated Apr. 7, 2011, 5 Pgs.
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic China; Chinese Search Report; Application No. 200910166935.6; dated Mar. 26, 2013; 2 pages.
Dennis et al., Multicenter Determination of In Vivo Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty, “Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 416, 37-57, 21 pgs”.
Signus Medizintechnik, “PEEK-OPTIMA, The Polymer for Implants, Technical Information for the Medical Professional,” 7 pages.
Operative Technique, Johnson Elloy Knee System, Chas F. Thackray, Ltd., 1988, 34 pgs.
Effects of Coronal Plane Conformity on Tibial Loading in TKA: A Comparison of AGC Flat Versus Conforming Articulations, Brent, et al, Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Technology International, XVIII, 6 pages.
Scorpio Knee TS Single Axis Revision Knee System, Stryker Orthopaedics, http://www.stryker.com/stellent/groups/public/documents/web_prod/023609.p- df, (6 pages).
Japanese Search Report, Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-153350, dated Jun. 18, 2013, 4 pages.
Indian Examination Report, Indian Patent Application No. 927/KOL/2009, dated Jun. 12, 2018, 5 pages.
Extended European Search Report, European Application No. 10174440.7-1526, dated Dec. 10, 2010, 4 Pages.
PCT Notification concerning transmittal of International Preliminary Report for corresponding International Appl. No. PCT/US2006/010431, dated Dec. 2, 2008, 6 pages.
Japanese Search Report, Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-122056, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 6 pages.
Indian Search Report, Indian Patent Application No. 929/KOL/2009, dated Jul. 16, 2018, 4 pages.
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Corresponding International App. Search Report PCT/US 12/44354, dated Sep. 24, 2012, 11 pages.
Shaw et al., “The Longitudinal Axis of the Knee and the Role of the Cruciate Ligaments in Controlling Transverse Rotation”, J.Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1974:56:1603-1609, 8 Pages.
Goodfellow et al., “The Mechanics of the Knee and Prosthesis Design,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 60-B, No. 3, Aug. 1978, 12 pgs.
Clary et al., “Kinematics of Posterior Stabilized and Cruciate Retaining Knee Implants During an in Vitro Deep Knee Bend,” 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Poster No. 1983, Mar. 2008.
Kurosawa, et al., “Geometry and Motion of the Knee for Implant and Orthotic Design”, The Journal of Biomechanics 18 (1985), pp. 487-499, 12 Pages.
2nd Int'l Johnson-Elloy Knee Meeting, Mar. 1987, 9 pages.
Prosthesis and Instrumentation the Turning Point, Accord, The Johnson/Elloy Concept, Chas F. Thackray Ltd, 8 pages.
Murphy, Michael Charles, “Geometry and the Kinematics of the Normal Human Knee”, Submitted to Masachusetts Institute of Technology (1990), 379 Pages.
The Accuracy of Intramedullary Alignment in Total Knee Replacement, Elloy, et al, Chas F. Thackray Ltd, 12 pages.
Factors Affecting the Range of Movement of Total Knee Arthroplasty, Harvey et al, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 75-B, No. 6, Nov. 1993, 6 pages.
Five to Eight Year Results of the Johnson/Elloy (Accord) Total Knee Arthroplasty, Johnson et al, The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 8, No. 1, Feb. 1993, 6 pages.
Depuy Inc., “AMK Total Knee System Product Brochure”, 1996, 8 pages.
Fuller, et al., “A Comparison of Lower-Extremity Skeletal Kinematics Measured Using Skin and Pin-Mounted Markers”, Human Movement Science 16 (1997) 219-242, 24 Pages.
Dennis et al., “In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis,” Clin Orthop Rel Res, 356: 47-57, 1998.
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., “AMK Total Knee System Legent II Surgical Techinque”, 1998, 30 pages.
Operative Technique The Turning Point, Accord, The Johnson/Elloy Concept, Chas FL Thackray Ltd, 32 pages.
Procedure, References Guide for Use with P.F.C. Sigma Knee Systems, 1998, 8 pages.
Restoration of Soft Tissue Stability, Johnson, et al., Chas. F. Thackray, Ltd., 21 pages.
The Turning Point, Accord, The Johnson Elloy Concept, Chas F. Thackray Ltd, 20 pages.
Depuy PFC Sigma RP, “PFC Sigma Knee System with Rotating Platform Technical Monograph”, 1999, 0611-29-050 (Rev. 3), 70 pages.
Midvatus Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty, A Description and a Cadaveric Study Determining the Distance of the Popliteal Artery From the Patellar Margin of the Incision, Cooper et al., The Journal of Arthoplasty, vol. 14 No. 4, 1999, 4 Pages.
Advice Notice (NI) Mar. 2000, Defect & Investigation Centre, Mar. 13, 2000, 3 pages.
Ferris, “Matching observed spiral form curves to equations of spirals in 2-D images,” The First Japanese-Australian Joint Seminar, Mar. 2000, 7 pgs.
Hill, et al., “Tibiofemoral Movement 2: The Loaded and Unloaded Living Knee Studied by MRI” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 82-B, No. 8 (Nov. 2000), 1196-1198, 3 Pages.
Nakagawa, et al., “Tibiofemoral Movement 3: Full Flexion of the Normal Human Knee”, J.Bone Joint Surg. Am, vol. 82-B, No. 8 (2000). 1199-1200, 2 Pages.
The Effects of Conformity and Load in Total Knee Replacement, Kuster, et al, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 375, Jun. 2000, 11 pages.
Uvehammer et al., “In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty: flat compared with concave tibial joint surface,” J Orthop Res 18(6): 856-64, 2000.
Asano et al. “In Vivo Three-Dimensional Knee Kinematics Using a Biplanar Image-Matching Technique,” Clin Orthop Rel Res, 388: 157-166, 2001, (10 pages).
D'Lima et al., “Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty,” Clin Orthop Rel Res 393:213-20, 2001.
Bertin et al., “In Vivo Determination of Posterior Femoral Rollback for Subjects Having a NexGen Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 17, No. 8, 2002, 9 pgs.
The Johnson Elloy (Accord) Total Knee Replacement, Norton et al, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (BR), vol. 84, No. 6, Aug. 2002, 4 pages.
Walker, et al., “Motion of a Mobile Bearing Knee Allowing Translation of Rotation”, Journal of Arthroplasty 17 (2002): 11-19, 9 Pages.
Andriacchi, T.P., “The Effect of Knee Kinematics, Gait and Wear on the Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Primary Knee Replacement,” NIH Consensus Development Conference on Total Knee Replacement, pp. 61-62, Dec. 8-10, 2003, (4 pages).
Blaha, et al., “Kinematics of the Human Knee Using an Open Chain Cadaver Model”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 410 (2003); 25-34, 10 Pages.
Komistek, et al., “In Vivo Flouroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human Knee”, Clinical Orthopaedics 410 (2003): 69-81, 13 Pages.
Ranawat, “Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR,” Clin Orthop Rel Res 416: 174-6, 2003.
Dennis, et al. “A Multi-Center Analysis of Axial Femorotibial Rotation After Total Knee Arthoplasty” , Clinical Orthopaedics 428 (2004); 180-189, 10 Pages.
Komistek, et al., “In Vivo Polyethylene Bearing Mobility Is Maintained in Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty”, Clinical Orthopaedics 428 (2004): 207-213, 7 Pages.
Saari et al., “The effect of tibial insert design on rising from a chair; motion analysis after total knee replacement,” Clin Biomech 19(9): 951-6, 2004.
Carl Zeiss, Zeiss Surfcomm 5000—“Contour and Surface Measuring Machines”, 2005, 16 pages.
Dennis et al., “In Vivo Determination of Normal and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee Kinematics,” J. Biomechanics, 38, 241-253, 2005, 13 pgs.
Freeman, M.A.R., et al., “The Movement of the Normal Tibio-Femoral Joint”, The Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) (2), pp. 197-208, 12 Pgs.
P. Johal et al, “Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using ‘interventional’ MRI,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 38, Issue 2, Feb. 2005, pp. 269-276, (8 pages).
Wang et al., “A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems tor stand-to-sit movement,” Clin Biomech 20(4): 428-33, 2005.
Toshiya et al., “In Vivo Kinematic Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasties Under Passive and Weight-bearing Conditions,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 20, No. 6, 2005, 7 pgs.
Li et al., “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Alters the In Vivo Motion of the Tibiofemoral Cartilage Contact Points in Both Anteroposterior and Mediolateral Directions,” JBJS-Am, vol. 88, No. 8, Aug. 2006, 9 pgs.
PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Prel. Report for Corresponding International App. No. PCT/US2006/010431, dated Jun. 5, 2007, 89 Pages.
Shakespeare, et al., “Flexion After Total Knee Replacement. A Comparison Between the Medical Pivot Knee and a Posterior Stabilised Knee”, www.sciencedirect.com, The Knee 13 (2006): 371-372, 3 Pages.
Suggs et al., “Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral Articular Contact Kinematics of a Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty,” JBJS-Am, vol. 88, No. 2, 2006, 10 pgs.
Wang et al., “Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii,” J Arthroplasty 21(8): 1193-9, 2006.
Kessler et al., “Sagittal curvature of total knee replacements predicts in vivo kinematics,” Clinical Biomechanics 22(1): 52-58, 2007.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200163773 A1 May 2020 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 15943798 Apr 2018 US
Child 16774399 US
Parent 14983079 Dec 2015 US
Child 15943798 US
Parent 14453371 Aug 2014 US
Child 14983079 US
Parent 12165579 Jun 2008 US
Child 14453371 US