1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to orthopaedic devices, and, more particularly, to orthopaedic implants.
2. Description of the Related Art
Most orthopaedic implants are formed from a metallic material suitable for a given implant, such as a hip implant, knee implant, glenoid implant, etc. In the case of articulating joints, the implant may include a non-metallic load bearing surface, such as an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). The UHMWPE is attached to the metallic body of the implant, and provides the implant with good wear characteristics and low friction.
It is also known to provide an implant with a porous bony ingrowth surface. For example, a hip implant may include a porous surface on the stem which is intended to allow bony ingrowth of the proximal end of the femur bone. Such a porous surface may be in the form of a metal porous surface which is bonded, such as by heat sintering, to the stem of the implant. Examples of porous surfaces of this type include a woven mesh, a fiber mesh and particles. Knee implants are also known that include porous ingrowth surfaces that can bear load from surrounding anatomic structures.
Porous surfaces of the type described above which are used with implants are not typically part of a single structural member with two opposed, external porous surfaces. For example, in a knee implant, the distal surface of the implant can sit on the porous material that is slightly above the substrate material, but the porous material only typically has one external surface for tissue ingrowth. For hip implants, the porous ingrowth surface is usually provided as a coating on a structural component of the implant, such as the stem.
In some orthopaedic applications, such as spinal cages, it is beneficial to have a porous member that extends between two external, load bearing surfaces of the implant. In such arrangements, a cavity is typically formed between the two external surfaces of the implant and filled with a porous ingrowth material, which is typically a natural substance such as cancellous bone tissue. Such an implant is described in U.S. Patent Application No. 2002/0091447 to Shimp et al. One problem with the implant described by Shimp et al. is that harvesting sufficient cancellous bone tissue to fill the cavity is expensive, and host rejection issues can be a concern. Other similar implants that contemplate utilizing natural or synthetic materials are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0210316 to King et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,095 to Van Hoeck et al. In each of these described implants, the porous material held in the cavity is fairly isolated from bearing load from surrounding anatomic structures after implantation, with external surfaces that are either flush or below the most protruding external surface of the main implant body. This is intentional, as the materials placed in the cavity tend to have significantly lower strength than the implant body. However, isolating the porous ingrowth material from bearing loads from surrounding anatomic structures also decreases the amount of surface area the porous ingrowth material has in contact with the anatomic structures, which can slow down integration of the implant. In addition, the porous materials placed in the cavity are typically resorbable by the body and will not last throughout the life of the implant.
What is needed in the art is an orthopaedic implant that can overcome some of the disadvantages of known devices.
The present invention provides an orthopaedic implant with a porous load bearing member held within a surface-to-surface cavity formed in the implant's body that projects outwardly away from an exterior surface of the implant.
The invention in one form is directed to an orthopaedic implant that includes an implant body having a first surface with a first peak, a second surface opposite the first surface, and a cavity formed therein that extends through the first surface and second surface. The implant body is substantially non-porous. A load bearing member comprising a substantially porous material is held within the cavity. The load bearing member has a first contact surface that extends out of the cavity past the first peak of the first surface.
The invention in another form is directed to an orthopaedic implant that includes an implant body having a first surface with a first peak, a second surface opposite the first surface, and a cavity formed therein that extends through the first surface and second surface. The implant body is substantially non-porous. A load bearing member comprising a substantially porous material is held within the cavity. The load bearing member has a first contact surface that extends out of the cavity and is proud of a portion of the first surface.
An advantage of the present invention is that the porous load bearing member can bear load from anatomic structures during implantation while providing a surface for tissue ingrowth.
Another advantage of the present invention is that an ingrowth material can be included on the implant to provide an additional surface for tissue ingrowth that has different ingrowth properties than the load bearing member.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The exemplifications set out herein illustrate embodiments of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
I. Porous Spinal Devices—Laminate Designs
The present invention provides a laminate method for a spinal implant or implant component, including manufacturing methods for sheet creation, bonding/assembly methods, and ways of creating tapers. Further, the present invention provides delivery of therapeutic agents through a spinal device.
The present invention addresses these issues by providing the design and method of manufacturing of a porous spinal fusion device.
A. Materials
Material options for the spinal device include the following: implantable polymers (such as PEEK, PMMA), implantable reinforced polymers (such as carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK), implantable metals (such as titanium, titanium alloy), and implantable ceramics (such as hydroxyapatite, alumina). One or more of these materials can be combined in a given device.
B. Overall Design
With regard to the overall design, the implant can include entirely porous material or one or more porous regions and one or more solid regions. Additionally, an entirely porous device can be created to mate with existing solid devices (See
The porous region is created by stacking layers of material with interconnecting holes/geometry (hereafter referred to as holes).
The solid region can be formed by traditional techniques such as injection molding or machining or by bonding solid sheets together. The later method allows the solid and porous regions to be created from continuous sheets (See
The holes in the sheets can be created by, for example, laser cutting, punching, etching, electrical discharge machining, plasma etching, electroforming, electron beam machining, water jet cutting, stamping, or machining. For polymer based materials, they can be created as the sheets are created by, for example, extruding, injection molding, or hot stamping.
Attachment of the sheets to each other can be achieved by any number of ways, including the following:
1. Heat. Heat can be generated by several ways:
2. Chemical.
3. Mechanical.
4. Combinations of any/all of the above methods.
If the porous and solid regions are created separately (as in
1. Heat. Heat can be generated by several ways:
2. Chemical.
3. Mechanical.
4. Combinations of any/all of the above methods.
Assembly of layer to layer or one component to another (for example a porous component to a solid component) can be aided by such ways as surface modifications to improve adhesive or solvent bonding or roughened surfaces.
The laminate portion of the implant can have layers oriented in any direction. For example, the layers can be perpendicular, parallel, or at an angle to the axis of the implant (See
The overall shape of the implant can be of any typical existing type, such as ALIF, TLIF, PLIF, and standard round cages (see
C. Delivery of Therapeutic Agent.
This device can be used to deliver therapeutic agents directly to the tissue surrounding the implant (See
The implant can include a reservoir for delivery of the therapeutic agent over an extended period of time. Openings leading from the reservoir to the porous material allow for controlled release of the therapeutic agents at a desired rate. The reservoir can be refilled at any time before, during, or after the surgery.
If immediate delivery of the therapeutic agents to the surrounding tissue is all that is required (not extended time release), the design need not include a reservoir. In this case, the therapeutic agents can be directly routed from the implant access to the porous material via channels. However, a reservoir can be included in an immediate delivery design; the openings in the reservoir would be sized to allow for immediate release of the therapeutic agent rather than a slower, long-term delivery.
The access in the implant (see
In order to allow and promote bone growth through the implant from one vertebra to the other, openings run from the superior to the inferior portion of the implant and be appropriately sized to allow for bone ingrowth (See
D. Anterior-Posterior Taper
Some implants are tapered to mate with the natural anterior-posterior taper that exists between vertebrae. If a solid portion exists, this taper can be created by traditional machining and/or molding techniques. In the porous region, there are several ways of creating this taper, including the following:
It is often desirable to have an implant-bone interface with relative high friction. Traditionally, this is achieved by such ways as a roughened implant surface, teeth (See
In a laminate implant, there are several options for creating such features. These options include the following:
F. Interface with Instruments
To aid in insertion of the implant into position in the body, it is often necessary to attach the implant to instrumentation. The material near the interface of the instrument and implant can often see additional stress. In a partially or fully laminate implant, it may be necessary to provide additional support in the region of this interface. This can be achieved by a number of ways, including: designing the instrument to reduce stresses and/or strengthening the implant in the region of the interface. For example, in the case of an instrument that contains a male thread which mates with a female thread in the implant, the implant can be strengthened by adding metal, solid polymer, or reinforced polymer in the region of the female thread. In machine design, thread inserts are frequently used to repair damaged threads. In this case, thread inserts can be used to strengthen the implant at the interface with the instrument(s).
G. Radiopaque Markers
When a radiolucent material, such as unfilled PEEK, is used, it is sometimes desirable to have the ability to see some or all of that implant on a diagnostic tool such as x-ray without the white-out problems of solid metal. For example, the surgeon may use such markers to determine the orientation and position of the implant to ensure proper placement during surgery. Radiopaque markers can provide this ability. The opacity and/or amount of radiopaque material can be controlled so that the marker does not prevent evaluation of the tissue near the implant by x-ray or other diagnostic ways. Material options include, but are not limited to, the following:
Examples of the marker design include one or more of the following:
The key to the success of a spinal fusion surgery is the formation of good bone growth between the vertebrae that are being fused. Evaluation of this bone growth is, thus, critical to determining the progress and eventual success of the surgery.
Existing porous spinal cages are made of biocompatible metals. Due to the density of these metals, the implants made post-operative examination of the tissue surrounding the implant difficult.
Several current devices are now made from solid biocompatible polymers such as PEEK. PEEK is a relatively radiolucent material. While this addresses the issue of radiopacity for solid fusion devices, it is often desired to encourage more rapid bone growth between the two vertebrae.
One solution for this problem is implants made from porous biocompatible polymers, such as PEEK or reinforced porous PEEK.
A. Overall Design
Such implants can be entirely porous or have a mix of porous and solid polymer. For example, a solid ring of material can surround a porous core (See
One embodiment of the design is a porous center component that mates with existing solid, ring-like devices. This device could be assembled with the solid device in a manufacturing setting or in the operating room.
If a solid region/component exists, the porous and solid regions may need, but do not necessarily need, to be attached to one another. Examples of methods that can be used to attach the porous and solid material are:
It is sometimes desirable to have the ability to see some of the implant on a diagnostic tool such as an x-ray without the white-out problems of solid metal. For example, the surgeon may use such markers to determine the orientation and position of the implant to ensure proper placement during surgery. Radiopaque markers can provide this ability. The opacity and/or amount of radiopaque material can be controlled so that the marker does not prevent evaluation of the tissue near the implant by x-ray or other diagnostic ways. Material options include, but are not limited to, the following:
Examples of the marker design include one or more of the following:
Referring now to
A cavity 108 is formed in the implant body 102 extending through the first surface 104 and second surface 106 to form a continuous cavity 108 through the implant body 102. The cavity 108 has a first cavity entrance 110 formed through the first surface 104 and a second cavity entrance 112 (shown in
A load bearing member 114 comprising a substantially porous material having a first contact surface 116 is held within the cavity 108 that is formed within the implant body 102. As used herein, “substantially porous” indicates a porosity of at least 20%, but can be significantly higher. For example, the load bearing member 114 can have a total volume, that is the entire volume occupied by the load bearing member 114, of which 60% or more is defined by pores 117 formed in the load bearing member 114. In other words, 40% of the total volume of the load bearing member 114 can be occupied by structural material forming the load bearing member 114 while 60% of the total volume is occupied by empty spaced defined by the pores 117, in aggregate. If an extremely porous material is used to form the load bearing member 114, the pores 117, in aggregate, can occupy 80% or more of the total volume of the load bearing member 114. If desired, one or more therapeutic agents can be held within some or all of the pores 117 for elution into surrounding anatomic features after implantation of the orthopaedic implant 100 to increase the efficacy of the surgical procedure. A non-exhaustive list of possible therapeutic agents that can be provided in the pores 117 includes various growth factors, bone morphogenetic factors, bone morphogenetic proteins, anti-microbial agents, anti-inflammatories, anti-coagulants, painkillers, cytotoxic substances, stem cells, and any other substance, known or unknown, that is desirable to elute from the orthopaedic implant 100 following implantation. The material(s) used to form the load bearing member 114 should, like the implant body 102, be biocompatible so that the orthopaedic implant 100 is suitable for implantation at an anatomical site within a patient. It is also useful if the load bearing member 114 is formed from one or more materials that are non-resorbable, i.e., the material of the load bearing member 114 can maintain at least 90% of its original mass after being implanted in a living patient for at least a year. Examples of such materials are PEEK, tantalum, and titanium, but other porous materials are also contemplated as being used. The load bearing member 114 can comprise either a synthetic material, such as those previously described, or one or more naturally derived materials, such as a bone graft. The naturally derived material can also be, for example, cells or tissues harvested from the patient or a different organism, scaffolds created using collagen or other biomaterials, etc. It is useful, but not required, for the load bearing member 114 to substantially fill the cavity 108 so that at least 90% of the empty space in the implant body 102 defined by the cavity 108 is filled by the bearing member 114. Such filling of the cavity 108 by the load bearing member 114 makes it easier to hold the load bearing member 114 within the cavity 108 during implantation.
The first surface 104 defines a first peak 118, which is a point on the first surface 104 that has a maximum height, relative to a ground surface, when the second surface 106 of the implant body 102 is laid on the ground surface. The first peak 118 of implant body 102 is best shown in
Due to the varying shapes of anatomic structures and desired load bearing characteristics, the first contact surface 116 can be a curved surface or a planar surface. The relative sizing between the first surface 104 and the first contact surface 116 can also be adjusted, as desired, to balance the load bearing characteristics of the load bearing member 114. As can be seen, the first contact surface 116 defines a contact surface area and the first surface 104 defines a first surface area, with the contact surface area and first surface area together defining a top surface area of the orthopaedic implant 100. The relative percentage of the top surface area that the contact surface area makes up can be altered to give varying amount of contact surface for anatomic structures during implantation. It is contemplated that the contact surface area can be 40 to 90% of the total surface area when a large contact surface 116 is desired, or less than 40% of the total surface area when a smaller contact surface 116 is desired. It should be understood that the term “top surface area” is used for convenience of description only and not to limit the scope of the present invention.
Optionally, the load bearing member 114 can have a second contact surface 120 extending out of the cavity 108 past the second cavity entrance 112 so that it extends past a second peak 122 of the second surface 106 of the implant body 102. The second peak 122 of the second surface 106 is analogous to the first peak 118 of the first surface 104, with the key difference being that the second peak 122 defines a maximum height of the second surface 106 relative to a ground surface when the first surface 104 is laid on the ground surface. The second contact surface 120 can be configured and altered similarly to the first contact surface 116 so that the second contact surface 120 can be in contact with an anatomic structure following implantation. The second contact surface 120 can be a mirror image of the first contact surface 116 or a different configuration, depending on the desired load bearing characteristics of the load bearing member 114 caused by loads bearing on the first and second contact surfaces 116, 120 from surrounding anatomic structures. It can be useful if the pores 117 of the load bearing member 114 interconnect from the first contact surface 116 to the second contact surface 120 so that a travel path through the entirety of the load bearing member 114 can be formed through interconnected pores 117 formed therein.
To assist in implanting the orthopaedic implant 100, an opening 124 can be formed through another surface 126 of the implant body 102 to the cavity 108. The opening 124 can be any size or shape that allows for an insertion tool (not shown) to be placed within the opening 124 to help steady and position the orthopaedic implant 100 during implantation. The load bearing member 114 can partially extend into the opening 124, another material can be held in the opening 124, or the opening 124 can provide a clear path to the load bearing member 114 held in the cavity 108. In a similar manner, one or more protrusions 128 can be placed adjacent to the opening 124 that are shaped to interact with the insertion tool and provide a more stable connection between the orthopaedic implant 100 and the insertion tool. The opening 124 and protrusion(s) 128 can also be configured so that a removal tool (not shown), rather than an insertion tool, can interact with the opening 124 and protrusion(s) 128 to remove the orthopaedic implant 100 from a patient following implantation, if necessary.
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A load bearing member 410 comprising a substantially porous material is held within the cavity 408. The load bearing member 410 has a first contact surface 412 that extends out of the cavity 408 and is proud of a portion of the first surface 404 to which the first contact surface 412 is immediately adjacent. Put another way, the first contact surface 412 outwardly projects from the cavity 408 so that it will contact surrounding anatomic features when the orthopaedic implant 400 is implanted and isolate portions of the first surface 404 immediately adjacent to the cavity 408 from initially bearing load from the surrounding anatomic features. Since the first surface 404 is sloped, the first contact surface 412 does not necessarily extend past a peak of the first surface 404, as previously described first contact surfaces do. However, in all other aspects, load bearing member 410 and first contact surface 412 can be configured similarly to previously described load bearing members and contact surfaces.
Referring now to
While this invention has been described with respect to at least one embodiment, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
This is a continuation-in-part application based upon U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/540,515, entitled “ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT WITH POROUS STRUCTURAL MEMBER”, filed Aug. 13, 2009, which is based upon U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/088,460, entitled “SPINAL DEVICES”, filed Aug. 13, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3662405 | Bortz et al. | May 1972 | A |
3683421 | Martinie | Aug 1972 | A |
3855638 | Pilliar | Dec 1974 | A |
3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4011602 | Rybicki et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4060081 | Yannas et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4156943 | Collier | Jun 1979 | A |
4222128 | Tomonaga et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4450150 | Sidman | May 1984 | A |
4453537 | Spitzer | Jun 1984 | A |
4485097 | Bell | Nov 1984 | A |
4520821 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4608052 | Van Kampen et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609551 | Caplan et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620327 | Caplan et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4644627 | Palazzo | Feb 1987 | A |
4660755 | Farling et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4737411 | Graves, Jr. et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4769041 | Morscher | Sep 1988 | A |
4846834 | Von Recum et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4858603 | Clemow et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4936859 | Morscher et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4976738 | Frey et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5030233 | Ducheyne | Jul 1991 | A |
5041107 | Heil, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5084051 | Tormala et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092898 | Bekki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100392 | Orth et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104410 | Chowdhary | Apr 1992 | A |
5190550 | Miller et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197985 | Caplan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204055 | Sachs et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5219363 | Crowninshield et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226914 | Caplan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5281210 | Burke et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282861 | Kaplan | Feb 1994 | A |
5306309 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5328765 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5370690 | Barrett | Dec 1994 | A |
5380328 | Morgan | Jan 1995 | A |
5443471 | Swajger | Aug 1995 | A |
5458643 | Oka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462362 | Yuhta et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5490962 | Cima et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496372 | Hamamoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514182 | Shea | May 1996 | A |
5518680 | Cima et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531750 | Even-Esh | Jul 1996 | A |
5534028 | Bao et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537851 | Sheu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549700 | Graham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571187 | Devanathan | Nov 1996 | A |
5593443 | Carter et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5637175 | Feygin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641323 | Caldarise | Jun 1997 | A |
5702449 | McKay | Dec 1997 | A |
5730817 | Feygin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732469 | Hamamoto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5750103 | Cherksey | May 1998 | A |
5769897 | Harle | Jun 1998 | A |
5776199 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
5800828 | Dionne et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807406 | Brauker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5848989 | Villani | Dec 1998 | A |
5849015 | Haywood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5869170 | Cima et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871484 | Spievack et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876550 | Feygin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879406 | Lilley | Mar 1999 | A |
5916269 | Serbousek et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5971985 | Carchidi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5989250 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010336 | Shimotoso et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037519 | McKay | Mar 2000 | A |
6045581 | Burkinshaw | Apr 2000 | A |
6110179 | Flivik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6136029 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136031 | Middleton | Oct 2000 | A |
6139574 | Vacanti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143035 | McDowell | Nov 2000 | A |
6159247 | Klawitter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176874 | Vacanti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6238435 | Meulink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283997 | Garg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290726 | Pope et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315797 | Middleton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322564 | Surma | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328765 | Hardwick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333029 | Vyakarnam et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337198 | Levene et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365149 | Vyakarnam et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6379391 | Masini | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395011 | Johanson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409764 | White et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419704 | Ferree | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423095 | Van Hoeck | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423252 | Chun et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425921 | Grundei et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440734 | Pykett et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454811 | Sherwood et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458162 | Koblish | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461385 | Gayer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471689 | Joseph et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471993 | Shastri et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475137 | Elist | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494916 | Babalola et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514514 | Atkinson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520993 | James et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526984 | Nilsson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6527810 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530958 | Cima et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533818 | Weber et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534084 | Vyakarnam et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544472 | Compton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547824 | Price | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551290 | Elsberry et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554857 | Zilla et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565572 | Chappius | May 2003 | B2 |
6571130 | Ljungstroem et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6599322 | Amrich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610095 | Pope et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6626950 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635049 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645251 | Salehi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656489 | Mahmood et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660040 | Chan et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673108 | Zilla et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682567 | Schroeder | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692528 | Ward et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709463 | Pope et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709464 | Scott et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712850 | Vyakarnam et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723120 | Yan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736850 | Davis | May 2004 | B2 |
6749636 | Michelson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758863 | Estes et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783546 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6818620 | Bhatnagar | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852272 | Artz et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863899 | Koblish et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866685 | Chan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6881413 | Bartholeyns | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6893465 | Huang | May 2005 | B2 |
6913623 | Zhu | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6916321 | TenHuisen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6958078 | Goel et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969383 | Hildebrand | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979353 | Bresina | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989033 | Schmidt | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993406 | Cesarano, III et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7018416 | Hanson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018418 | Amrich et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7052710 | Giordano et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7077867 | Pope et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7087086 | Li et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087200 | Taboas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090668 | U et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7094371 | Lo | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108828 | Lefebvre et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112223 | Davis | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128762 | Middleton | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D533277 | Blain | Dec 2006 | S |
7174282 | Hollister et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189409 | Pirhonen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192440 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D539934 | Blain | Apr 2007 | S |
7208222 | Rolfe et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
D541940 | Blain | May 2007 | S |
7226612 | Sohier et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238186 | Zdeblick et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7238363 | Mansouri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250055 | Vanderwalle | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7250060 | Trieu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255713 | Malek | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7300439 | May | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D564095 | Blain | Mar 2008 | S |
D566276 | Blain | Apr 2008 | S |
7354452 | Foley | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7537617 | Bindsell et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7537664 | O'Neill et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
D594986 | Miles | Jun 2009 | S |
D599019 | Pimenta | Aug 2009 | S |
7575572 | Sweeney | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7632228 | Brauker et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632338 | Cipollini | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666230 | Orban et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674426 | Grohowski, Jr. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7674477 | Schmid et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
D616546 | Vraney | May 2010 | S |
7717956 | Lang | May 2010 | B2 |
D619719 | Pannu | Jul 2010 | S |
D620114 | Pannu | Jul 2010 | S |
D620115 | Pannu | Jul 2010 | S |
D620116 | Pannu | Jul 2010 | S |
D621509 | Lovell | Aug 2010 | S |
D627467 | Pannu | Nov 2010 | S |
D627468 | Richter | Nov 2010 | S |
7833271 | Mitchell | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7875080 | Puno et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909870 | Kraus | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7963995 | Richelsoph | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8062372 | Tsuang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066750 | Oi | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8147521 | Cornwall | Apr 2012 | B1 |
D671645 | Curran | Nov 2012 | S |
D674092 | Lovell | Jan 2013 | S |
8496706 | Ragab | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8568482 | Kraus | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8623088 | Tohmeh | Jan 2014 | B1 |
D770045 | Curran | Oct 2016 | S |
20010038848 | Donda et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039455 | Simon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022884 | Mansmann | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029083 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035400 | Bryan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020062154 | Ayers | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072798 | Riesle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091447 | Shimp et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106393 | Bianchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128715 | Bryan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143402 | Steinberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161447 | Salehi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020182241 | Borenstein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183850 | Felt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197178 | Yan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003127 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004578 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006534 | Taboas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012805 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023311 | Trieu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055506 | Stoy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060886 | Van Hoeck et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060891 | Shah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069465 | Benkowski et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097182 | Buchman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105527 | Bresina | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114934 | Steinberg | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114936 | Sherwood et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118649 | Gao et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120344 | Michelson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125739 | Bagga | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130743 | Scott et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139809 | Worst et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171738 | Konieczynski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171820 | Wilshaw et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180171 | Artz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187513 | Durniak | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203002 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206928 | Tormala et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208274 | Davis | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040024470 | Giordano et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034357 | Beane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034427 | Goel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040063206 | Rowley et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073197 | Kim | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040115172 | Bianchi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126405 | Sahatjian et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147905 | Krumme | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153165 | Li et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040180072 | Tunc et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191106 | O'Neill et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191292 | Chou | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193273 | Huang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199260 | Pope et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210274 | Bauhahn et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210316 | King et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215173 | Kunst | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225360 | Malone | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249463 | Bindseil et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258732 | Shikinami | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265350 | Sambrook et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267263 | May | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015059 | Sweeney | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015150 | Lee | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021084 | Lu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049715 | Ito et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049716 | Wagener et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055099 | Ku | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058684 | Shanley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059972 | Biscup | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085888 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100470 | Lefebvre et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100578 | Schmid et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112397 | Rolfe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119753 | McGahan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125073 | Orban et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137707 | Malek | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143822 | Paul | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159819 | McCormack et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171611 | Stoy et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175703 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177238 | Khandkar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177247 | Canham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182494 | Schmid | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187555 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192669 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197654 | Edman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202371 | McGuire | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220837 | Disegi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222688 | Zilla et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228503 | Gundolf | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246032 | Bokros et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271694 | Mansouri et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272153 | Xuenong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273082 | Olsen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273178 | Boyan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002810 | Grohowski, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015186 | Isaac | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047341 | Trieu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057737 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064170 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064172 | Trieu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083730 | Kusanagi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093646 | Cima et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100706 | Shadduck et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100716 | Lerf | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105015 | Perla et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111782 | Petersen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111785 | O'Neil | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121609 | Yannas et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129242 | Bergeron et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141012 | Gingras | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149220 | Ullestad et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149386 | Clark et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173542 | Shikinami | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178744 | de Villiers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193885 | Leonard Neethling et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195188 | O'Driscoll et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200166 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060204581 | Gower et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229715 | Istephanous et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235534 | Gertzman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241593 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264950 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271022 | Steinbach et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271201 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276900 | Carpenter | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282166 | Molz et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287689 | Debruyne et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289388 | Yang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293757 | McKay et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016163 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026069 | Shastri et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038299 | Stone et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041952 | Guilak et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043446 | Murray | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070077267 | Molz, IV et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105222 | Wolfinbarger et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116734 | Akash | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123843 | Gill | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138042 | Wood | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141105 | Stein et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141533 | Ford et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150063 | Ruberte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150064 | Ruberte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150068 | Dong et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160681 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161986 | Levy | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162110 | Dave | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166348 | Van Dyke | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168021 | Holmes, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185580 | Posel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185585 | Bracy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190880 | Dubrow et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191963 | Winterbottom et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196419 | Teller et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202145 | Ghabrial et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203584 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208420 | Ameer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213827 | Arramon | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233071 | Dewey et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243225 | McKay | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250169 | Lang | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255262 | Haase | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255416 | Melkent et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260320 | Peterman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270859 | Companioni et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293948 | Bagga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004704 | Katz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015578 | Erickson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046082 | Lee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065218 | O'Neil | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077247 | Murillo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080109083 | Van Hoeck et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119945 | Frigg | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147193 | Matthis | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188940 | Cohen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200985 | Robie | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080262622 | Butler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288074 | O'Neil | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306609 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005872 | Moumene | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005874 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024224 | Chen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030399 | Raiszadeh | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090132051 | Moskowitz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090222098 | Trieu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228109 | Pointillant | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248162 | Peckham | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254182 | Kovarik | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270986 | Christensen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270988 | Snell | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270991 | Michelson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270992 | Gerber | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276049 | Weiland | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281517 | Lambrecht | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281625 | Enayati | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292363 | Goldfarb | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090317278 | Kokubo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326657 | Grinberg | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003639 | Salvi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016970 | Kapitan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042167 | Nebosky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042213 | Nebosky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042214 | Nebosky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042215 | Stalcup et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042218 | Nebosky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042226 | Nebosky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076559 | Bagga | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100168798 | Clineff | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190254 | Chian et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234966 | Lo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100291286 | O'Neill et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110012280 | Deslauriers | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110064784 | Mullens et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066244 | Frasier | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110137418 | O'Neil | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153028 | Albertorio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110190888 | Bertele et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110230970 | Lynn | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110313532 | Hunt | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120303128 | Ullrich, Jr. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316650 | Ullrich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030529 | Hunt | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20150150689 | Wang | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238324 | Nebosky | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4211345 | Nov 1993 | DE |
4423020 | Jan 1996 | DE |
693 28 047 | Mar 2000 | DE |
19904436 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10051438 | May 2002 | DE |
695 28 346 | Sep 2002 | DE |
10120330 | Nov 2002 | DE |
10157315 | Aug 2003 | DE |
0617931 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0827726 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1 273 312 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 287 851 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1475057 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1806112 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2697155 | Apr 1994 | FR |
6007388 | Jan 1994 | JP |
7116184 | May 1995 | JP |
8173463 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2587625 | Dec 1996 | JP |
2002325781 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2005329179 | Dec 2005 | JP |
03084602 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03101504 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005047467 | May 2005 | WO |
2006088480 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006135727 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007135444 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053724 (2 pages). |
International Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053735 (2 pages). |
International Search Report dated Sep. 23, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053762 (2 pages). |
International Search Report dated Oct. 14, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053751 (2 pages). |
Joseph P. Vacanti, Martin A. Morse, W. Mark Saltzman, Abraham J. Domb, Antonio Perez-Atayde, and Robert Langer; article entitles “Selective Cell Transplantation Using Bioabsorbable Artifical Polymers as Matrices”, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 3-9, Jan. 1988, published by Grune & Stratton, Inc. |
N.R. Boeree, J. Dove, J.J. Cooper, J. Knowles, and G.W. Hastings, article entitled “Development of a Degradable Composite for Orthopaedic Use: Mechanical Evaluation of an Hydroxyapatite-Polyhydroxybutyrate Composite Material”, Biomaterials, vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 793-796, 1993, published by Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. |
R.B. Martin, M.W. Chapman, N.A. Sharkey, S.L. Zissimos, B. Bay, and E.C. Shors, article entitled “Bone Ingrowth and Mechanical Properties of Coralline Hydroxyapatite 1 Yr After Implantation”, Biomaterials, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 341-348, 1993, published by Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. |
Article entitled “Fractal” (nine pages), published on the Internet by the online encyclopedia Wikipedia; downloaded from the internet on Dec. 14, 2006 in the United States from the following address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractals. |
Editor in Chief Sybil P. Parker, p. 799 (showing entries from “fp” to “fracture test”) of McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, Fifth Edition, published by McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994, New York. |
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,425 (20 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (10 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053724 (8 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053735 (7 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 23, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053762 (4 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/053751 (6 pages). |
Article entitled “Rolled Threads” (3 pages), published on the Internet by the online encyclopedia Wikipedia; downloaded from the internet on Aug. 24, 2009 in the United States from the following address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:American—Machinists—Handbook-2e—p23-v001.png. |
Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2010 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/055380 (8 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 13, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/055397 (9 pages). |
Unknown Author, article entitled “MacroPore Resorbable Technology: An Overview”, Scientific Data Series in Resorbable Fixation, MKT004 Rev. Jun. 2001, pp. 1-8; distributed by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 1800 Pyramid Place, Memphis TN 38132, (Jun. 2001). |
Ralph E. Holmes, M.D., Stefan M. Lemperle, M.D., and Christopher J. Calhoun, M.B.A., article entitled “Protected Bone Regeneration”, Scientific Data Series in Resorbable Fixation, MKT003 Rev. Jun. 2001, pp. 1-10; distributed by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 1800 Pyramid Place, Memphis TN 38132, (Jun. 2001). |
D.R. Sumner, T.M. Turner, R.M. Urban, R.M. Leven, M. Hawkins, E.H. Nichols, J.M. McPherson, J.O. Galante, article entitled “Locally Delivered rhTGF-B2 Enhances Bone Ingrowth and Bone Regeneration at Local and Remote Sites of Skeletal Injury”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research 19 (2001) pp. 85-94, published by Elsevier Science Ltd. |
International Search Report dated May 18, 2005 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2004/036997 (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/048,408, filed Apr. 15, 1993 with U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (108 pages). |
Preliminary Amendment dated Jul. 8, 1993 and filed in U.S. Appl. No. 08/048,408 with U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (12 pages). |
Machine English translation of JP 2587625 (10 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2006 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2004/036997 (6 pages). |
Written Opinion dated May 18, 2005 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2004/036997 (5 pages). |
Communication and supplementary European search report dated Nov. 14, 2008 from European Patent Office in application No. 04818642 (3 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2010 from European Patent Office in application No. 04818642 (5 pages). |
International Search Report dated Mar. 12, 2007 of International Searching Authority for PCT/US2005/019045 (3 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 21, 2007 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2005/019045 (7 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2007 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2005/019045 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated May 7, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (13 pages). |
Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (3 pages). |
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (5 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (7 pages). |
Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (8 pages). |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 5, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (2 pages). |
Office Action dated May 27, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2016 for European Application No. 16156901.7 (7 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,377 (7 pages). |
A. Cameron, entitled “Basic Lubrication Theory”, Ellis Horwood Limited, pp. 134-137, 1976. |
A. Cameron, entitled “The Principles of Lubrication”, John Wiley and Sons Inc., pp. 542-559, 1966. |
Office Action dated May 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,425 (22 pages). |
Philip E. Mitchell, Handbook Editor, “Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook”, 4th Edition, vol. VIII Plastic Part Manufacturing, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan, pp. 2-17 and 2-18, 1996 (4 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/149,027, filed Aug. 16, 1999 with U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (44 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/200,636, filed Feb. 23, 1994 with U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (40 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 1995 in U.S. Appl. No. 08/200,636 (4 pages). |
Supplemental Information Disclosure Statement dated Sep. 11, 1995 in U.S. Appl. No. 08/200,636 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/437,781, filed May 9, 1995 with U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (84 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 1, 1996 in U.S. Appl. No. 08/437,781 (2 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/639,612, filed Aug. 15, 2000 with U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (67 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/053751 dated Oct. 14, 2009. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 15, 2011 for PCT/US2009/053724 (9 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 15, 2011 for PCT/US2009/053735 (8 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 15, 2011 for PCT/US2009/053751 (7 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 15, 2011 for PCT/US2009/053762 (5 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2011 for PCT/US2009/055380 (9 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2011 for PCT/US2009/055397 (10 pages). |
Photos 309 and 310 show a poster of which Applicant is aware. By disclosing these photos, Applicant is making no statement as to whether or not these photos are material or are prior art relative to the present application. |
Communication from Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated Jan. 11, 2013 for Canadian patent application No. 2,735,235 (2 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Apr. 22, 2013 for European Application No. 09 80 7307 (7 pages). |
Communication dated Apr. 11, 2013 from Canadian Intellectual Property Office for Canadian patent application No. 2,735,236 (3 pages). |
Communication dated May 22, 2013 from European Patent Office for European Patent Application No. 09807307.5-1506 (1 page). |
Communication dated May 2, 2013 from European Patent Office for European Patent Application No. 09807307.5-1506, including Supplementary European Search Report and opinion (7 pages). |
International Search Report dated Apr. 13, 2010 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/055380 (2 pages). |
International Search Report dated Oct. 13, 2009 of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/055397 (2 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,425 (16 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,425 (20 pages). |
Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/980,425 (3 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/325,530 (11 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/325,530 (13 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/325,530 (6 pages). |
Dr. Nicole Rotter, J. Aigner, A. Naumann, H. Planck, C. Hammer, G. Burmester, M. Sittinger; abstract of article entitled “Cartilage Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Comparison of Resorbable Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering of Human Septal Cartilage”, in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 42, issue 3, pp. 347-356, Dec. 5, 1998; accessed on Oct. 25, 2010 at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3%3C47::AID-JBM2%3E3.0.CO;2-J/abstract. |
Robert J. Klebe; article entitled “Cytoscribing: A Method for Micropositioning Cells and the Construction of Two-and Three-Dimensional Synthetic Tissues”, Experimental Cell Research 179 (1988) 362-373, published by Academic Presss, Inc. |
Emanuel Sachs, Michael Cima, James Bredt, Alain Curodeau, Tailin Fan, and David Brancazio; article entitled “Cad-Casting: Direct Fabrication of Ceramic Shells and Cores by Three Dimensional Printing”, Manufacturing Review vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 117-126, Jun. 1992, published by American Society of Mechanical Engineers. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150238324 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61088460 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12540515 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 14637142 | US |