Orthopedic apparatus for controlled contraction of collagen tissue

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6461353
  • Patent Number
    6,461,353
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 3, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 8, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An orthopedic apparatus, for effecting a change in ligaments, joint capsules and connective tissue through the controlled contraction of collagen fibers, includes a trocar. The trocar has a trocar elongated body with a trocar longitudinal axis, a trocar distal end that is laterally deflectable relative to the trocar longitudinal axis, and a trocar proximal end. An electrode is positioned at the trocar distal end. The electrode delivers substantially uniform energy across an energy delivery surface of the electrode. The energy delivery surface is positioned next to an area of collagen fibers to cause a controlled amount of contraction of the collagen fibers while minimizing dissociation and breakdown of the collagen fibers. A handle is positioned at the proximal end of the trocar. The handle includes an actuating member and a locking member. The actuating member has a resting position and one or more activation positions that cause the trocar distal end to become laterally deflected to a desired position of deflection. The locking member has a resting position and a locking position that locks the deflected trocar distal end in place. Further, the locking member is releasable from the locking position to the resting position or to one that is intermediate between the two in order to modify the activation position of the actuating member and change the deflection of the trocar distal end. The distal end's deflection can be readily adjusted and can return to a non-deflected position. The handle can be held in one hand, and the actuating and locking members each operable by a thumb and a finger of the hand.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates generally to an orthopedic apparatus that delivers a controlled amount of energy to an orthopedic site to contract collagen tissue, and more particularly, to an orthopedic apparatus that includes a handle with an actuating lever to deflect a distal end of a trocar, a locking lever to lock the position of a deflected distal end, wherein the deflection, locking, release and modification of the deflection are all achieved with a handle and the deflection and locking is achieved with a thumb and a finger of the same hand.




2. Description of Related Art




Instability of peripheral joints has long been recognized as a significant cause of disability and functional limitation in patients who are active in their daily activities, work or sports. Diarthrodial joints of musculoskeletal system have varying degrees of intrinsic stability based on joint geometry and ligament and soft tissue investment. Diarthrodial joints are comprised of the articulation of the ends of bones and their covering of hyaline cartilage surrounded by a soft tissue joint capsule that maintains the constant contact of the cartilage surfaces. This joint capsule also maintains within the joint the synovial fluid that provides nutrition and lubrication of the joint surfaces. Ligaments are soft tissue condensations in or around the joint capsule that reinforce and hold the joint together while also controlling and restricting various movements of the joints. The ligaments, joint capsule, and connective tissue are largely comprised of collagen.




When a joint becomes unstable, its soft tissue or bony structures allow for excessive motion of the joint surfaces relative to each other and in directions not normally permitted by the ligaments or capsule. When one surface of a joint slides out of position relative to the other surface, but some contact remains, subluxation occurs. When one surface of the joint completely disengages and loses contact with the opposing surface, a dislocation occurs. Typically, the more motion a joint normally demonstrates, the more inherently loose the soft tissue investment is surrounding the joint. This makes some joints more prone to instability than others. The shoulder, (glenohumeral) joint, for example, has the greatest range of motion of all peripheral joints. It has long been recognized as having the highest subluxation and dislocation rate because of its inherent laxity relative to more constrained “ball and socket” joints such as the hip.




Instability of the shoulder can occur congenitally, developmentally, or traumatically and often becomes recurrent, necessitating surgical repair. In fact subluxations and dislocations are a common occurrence and cause for a large number of orthopedic procedures each year. Symptoms include pain, instability, weakness, and limitation of function. If the instability is severe and recurrent, functional incapacity and arthritis may result. Surgical attempts are directed toward tightening the soft tissue restraints that have become pathologically loose. These procedures are typically performed through open surgical approaches that often require hospitalization and prolonged rehabilitation programs.




More recently, endoscopic (arthroscopic) techniques for achieving these same goals have been explored with variable success. Endoscopic techniques have the advantage of being performed through smaller incisions and therefore are usually less painful, performed on an outpatient basis, are associated with less blood loss and lower risk of infection and have a more cosmetically acceptable scar. Recovery is often faster postoperatively than using open techniques. However, it is often more technically demanding to advance and tighten capsule or ligamentous tissue arthroscopically because of the difficult access to pathologically loose tissue and because it is very hard to determine how much tightening or advancement of the lax tissue is clinically necessary. In addition, fixation of advanced or tightened soft tissue is more difficult arthroscopically than through open surgical methods.




Collagen connective tissue is ubiquitous in the human body and demonstrates several unique characteristics not found in other tissues. It provides the cohesiveness of the musculoskeletal system, the structural integrity of the viscera as well as the elasticity of integument. These are basically five types of collagen molecules with Type I being most common in bone, tendon, skin and other connective tissues, and Type III is common in muscular and elastic tissues.




Intermolecular cross links provide collagen connective tissue with unique physical properties of high tensile strength and substantial elasticity. A previously recognized property of collagen is hydrothermal shrinkage of collagen fibers when elevated in temperature. This unique molecular response to temperature elevation is the result of rupture of the collagen stabilizing cross links and immediate contraction of the collagen fibers to about one-third of their original lineal distention. Additionally, the caliber of the individual fibers increases greatly, over four fold, without changing the structural integrity of the connection tissue.




There has been discussion in the existing literature regarding alteration of collagen connective tissue in different parts of the body. One known technique for effective use of this knowledge of the properties of collagen is through the use of infrared laser energy to effect tissue heating. The use of infrared laser energy as a corneal collagen shrinking tool of the eye has been described and relates to laser keratoplasty, as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,976,709. The importance controlling the localization, timing and intensity of laser energy delivery is recognized as paramount in providing the desired soft tissue shrinkage effects without creating excessive damage to the surrounding non-target tissues.




Radiofrequency (RF) electrical current has been used to reshape the cornea. Such shaping has been reported by Doss in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,326,529; and 4,381,007. However, Doss was not concerned with dissociating collagen tissue in his reshaping of the cornea.




Shrinkage of collagen tissue is important in many applications. One such application is the shoulder capsule. The capsule of the shoulder consists of a synovial lining and three well defined layers of collagen. The fibers of the inner and outer layers extend in a coronal access from the glenoid to the humerus. The middle layer of the collagen extends in a sagittal direction, crossing the fibers of the other two layers. The relative thickness and degree of intermingling of collagen fibers of the three layers vary with different portions of the capsule. The ligamentous components of the capsule are represented by abrupt thickenings of the inner layer with a significant increase in well organized coarse collagen bundles in the coronal plane.




The capsule functions as a hammock-like sling to support the humeral head. In pathologic states of recurrent traumatic or developmental instability this capsule or pouch becomes attenuated and the capsule capacity increases secondary to capsule redundance. In cases of congenital or developmental multi-directional laxity, an altered ratio of type I to type III collagen fibers may be noted. In these shoulder capsules a higher ratio of more elastic type III collagen has been described.




There is a need for an orthopedic apparatus for effecting a change in ligaments, joint capsules and connective tissue through the controlled contraction of collagen fibers. There is a need for an apparatus that includes a handle with a lateral deflection actuating member that is pulled and causes a distal end of the trocar to be deflected to a desired position, and a locking member on the handle which locks the distal end in a laterally deflected position, and is releasable to modify the amount of deflection of the deflected distal end.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide an orthopedic apparatus that effects a change in ligaments, joint capsules and connective tissue through the controlled contraction of collagen fibers.




Another object of the invention is to provide an orthopedic apparatus, using an RF or microwave electrode, to effect a change in ligaments, joint capsules and connective tissue through the controlled contraction of collagen fibers.




A further object of the invention is to provide an orthopedic apparatus for the controlled contraction of collagen tissue that includes a trocar with a deflectable distal end, an RF or microwave electrode positioned at the distal end, and a handle that includes a actuating member to deflect the distal end and a locking member to lock the distal end in position. Deflection of the distal end and modification of the amount of deflection is achieved by a single hand.




Yet another object of the invention is to provide an orthopedic apparatus for the controlled contraction of collagen tissue that enables the surgeon to deflect a distal end of a trocar with an electrode surface, lock the deflection, modify the deflection, and permit the trocar to spring back to a non-deflected position with a thumb and a finger of only one hand.




Still a further object of the invention is to provide an orthopedic apparatus for the controlled contraction of collagen tissue that includes a handle which permits the physician to introduce a trocar of the orthopedic apparatus into a desired location of the body, and provide variable deflection of the distal end of the trocar in order to position the distal end at a desired located, and thereafter continue to modify the deflection in order to paint across selected collagen tissue surfaces to achieve a desired contraction of collagen tissue.




Yet another object of the invention is to provide an orthopedic apparatus, for the controlled contraction of collagen tissue, that includes a deflectable trocar distal end and a handle, with the handle permitting a quick modification of deflection, and easy return to a non-deflected position.




These and other objects of the invention are obtained in an orthopedic apparatus for effecting a change in ligaments, joint capsules and connective tissue through the controlled contraction of collagen fibers. A trocar includes a trocar elongated body with a trocar longitudinal axis, a trocar distal end that is laterally deflectable relative to the trocar longitudinal axis, and a trocar proximal end. An electrode is positioned at the trocar distal end. The electrode delivers substantially uniform energy across an energy delivery surface of the electrode. The energy delivery surface positioned next to an area of collagen fibers delivers a controlled amount of contraction of the collagen fibers while minimizing dissociation and breakdown of the collagen fibers. A handle is positioned at the proximal end of the trocar. The handle includes an actuating member and a locking member. The actuating member has a resting position and one or more activation positions. At the activation positions the trocar distal end becomes laterally deflected to a desired position of deflection. The locking member has a resting position and a locking position. The locking position locks the deflected trocar distal end in place. Further, the locking member is releasable from the locking position to the resting position or to a position that is intermediate between the two in order to modify the activation position of the actuating member and change the deflection of the trocar distal end. The distal end's deflection can be readily adjusted and can also return to a non-deflected position. The handle can be held in one hand, and the actuating and locking members are each operable by a thumb and a finger of the hand.




The electrode can be an RF electrode, and the orthopedic apparatus can further include an RF energy source, and a cable that connects the RF energy source to the handle and the electrode.




Further, the electrode be a microwave electrode, and the orthopedic apparatus can include a microwave energy source, and a cable that connects the microwave energy source to the handle and the electrode.




The electrode preferably has radiused edges. An insulating layer is positioned around an exterior of the trocar but does not cover the energy delivery surface of the electrode. A non-conductive layer can also be included and positioned on an opposite side of the electrode. This provides an electrode with only one conductive surface and with radiused edges. The trocar is deflectable. Deflection can be achieved by serrating the trocar, making it out of a memory metal, as well as other methods well known to those skilled in the art. Both the locking and actuating members are coupled to the trocar. The actuating member can be pivotally coupled to the handle, while the locking member can be slideably positioned on a exterior surface of the handle. The actuating and locking members can be positioned on opposite sides of the handle so that one can be operated with the thumb, and the other one with a finger. Both the actuating and locking members can be moved simultaneously or at different times. This provides the physician with an ability to readily deliver energy from the electrode to a collagen tissue site, and move the electrode in conformance with the geometry of the collagen tissue site.




The handle design provides physician control of the movement of the electrode to closely approximate a desired collagen tissue site. This is readily achieved with the use of only one hand.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of the orthopedic apparatus of the present invention including the handle, trocar with deflected distal end, and electrode.





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of the distal end of the trocar, with a layer of insulation partially removed from the distal end.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram of the orthopedic apparatus of the present invention illustrating the handpiece, an energy source and a cable connecting the handpiece to the energy source.





FIG. 4

is an exploded diagram of the orthopedic apparatus of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 5

is a drawing of the right gleno-humeral complex.





FIG. 6

is a drawing of a loose joint capsule.





FIG. 7

is a schematic drawing of the apparatus of the invention supplying energy to a joint structure.





FIG. 8

is a sectional view of a disc positioned between two vertebrae.





FIG. 9

is a schematic diagram of the apparatus of the invention with an electrode supplying energy to a herniated disc.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, an orthopedic apparatus for effecting a change in collagen tissue in orthopedics, including but not limited to ligaments, joint capsules and connective tissue includes a handpiece


10


. The orthopedic apparatus provides for the controlled contraction of collagen fibers, without substantially breaking down or dissociating the collagen fibers, or denature the collagen. The orthopedic apparatus of the present invention is used for controlled contraction of collagen soft tissue of a joint capsule, to treat herniated discs, the meniscus of the knee, for dermatology, to name just a few applications. Energy is delivered from an electrode to a collagen tissue site. The orthopedic apparatus provides a means for moving the electrode in conformance with the geometry of the collagen tissue site. A handle design of the orthopedic apparatus provides physician control of the movement of the electrode to closely approximate a desired collagen tissue site. This is readily achieved with the use of only one hand.




Handpiece


10


includes a trocar


12


with an elongated body and a longitudinal axis


14


. A trocar distal end


16


is laterally deflectable about longitudinal axis


14


. Trocar


12


also includes a proximal end


20


. In one embodiment, trocar has a


9


F outer diameter.




An electrode


20


is positioned at trocar distal end


16


. In one embodiment, electrode


20


has an outer diameter of 13F. Electrode


20


is capable of delivering substantially uniform energy across an energy delivery surface


22


to an area of collagen fibers. This results in controlled contraction of the collagen fibers while minimizing their dissociation or breakdown. The collagen structure is not denatured and is not ablated. Instead, the collagen structure is contracted. In the case of a joint capsule, the collagen tissue is contracted in order to pull the joint together. If there is too much contraction, then the joint can be physically worked until the collagen fibers stretch to a desired level. Controlled contraction of the collagen tissue is possible because of the design of electrode


20


, and the general design of handpiece


10


. Electrode


20


is radiused with no sharp edges. Sharp edges introduce hot spots in adjacent tissue which lead to tissue ablation instead of collagen shrinkage.




Electrode


20


has a backside


24


that can be covered with an insulating layer. Use of the insulating layer permits the physician to more accurately control delivery of energy to collagen tissue. In many orthopedic procedures electrode


20


must be moved back and forth, in a painting manner, along the collagen tissue surface. Often, the backside


24


of electrode


20


is adjacent to tissue which is not treated. Therefore, in order to reduce the possibility of ablating the tissue which should not be treated, it is beneficial to provide backside


24


with a layer of insulation so that energy is not delivered from backside


24


. The inclusion of an insulating layer to backside


24


can also provide electrode


20


with radiused edges. This is achieved by physically eliminating sharp edges on electrode


20


.




Handpiece


10


also includes a handle


26


attached at proximal end


18


. A coupler


27


can be included to couple handle


26


to trocar


12


. Trocar


12


can extend into an interior of handle


26


. Handle


26


includes an actuating member


28


and a locking member


30


. The positions of actuating and locking members


28


and


30


can vary. However, it is preferred that actuating member


28


and locking member


30


be positioned on an exterior surface of handle


26


on opposing sides. The physician can then use one hand; the thumb for one and a finger for the other. This provides physician control of trocar distal end


16


and electrode


20


so that collagen tissue is not ablated. Instead it is contracted to a desired state. Actuating member


28


is generally an elongated structure which is pivotally mounted to handle


26


. The physician pulls on the end of actuating member that opposes the end which is mounted to handle


26


. Actuating member


28


has a resting position when it is closest to handle


26


. As actuating member


28


is pulled away from the resting position it moves to one or more activation positions cause trocar distal end


16


to become deflected (articulated). The more actuating member


28


moves away from its resting position, the more trocar distal end


16


is deflected.




Locking member


30


also has a resting position, and a locking position that locks deflected trocar distal end


16


in place. Locking member


30


is releasable from its locking position to its resting position, or to an intermediate position, and holds the activation position of actuating member


28


when the deflection of trocar distal end


16


is adjusted. Handle


26


, with associated actuating member


28


and locking member


30


, is particularly suitable for use with one hand to easily adjust the amount of deflection of trocar distal end


16


.




Actuating member


28


can be directly coupled or indirectly coupled to trocar


12


. The same is true with locking member


30


. Positioned at a proximal end of handle


16


is a cable connector


31


.




As mentioned, in order to avoid the creation of hot spots, electrode


20


has radiused edges, with no square edges. A shrink tube


32


surrounds trocar


12


, leaving electrode


20


exposed.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, trocar


12


can be covered and surrounded by an insulation layer


34


which extends to electrode


20


. Insulation layer


34


can extend to electrode backside


24


. Trocar distal end


16


is laterally deflectable relative to longitudinal axis


14


. Deflection can be achieved by a variety of different means including but not limited to segmenting trocar distal end


16


, serrating trocar distal end


16


, the use of a steering wire (not shown) that extends internally or externally from handle


26


to distal end


16


, as well as other methods well known to those skilled in the art. All of trocar


12


may be made of a memory metal or only trocar distal end


16


can be made of a memory metal.




As shown in

FIG. 3

, orthopedic apparatus


36


includes handpiece


12


, an energy source


38


and a cable


40


coupled to handpiece


12


and energy source


38


. Suitable energy sources include RF, microwave and the like.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, an electrical connector


42


is coupled to cable connector


31


. Included in handle


26


is a locking slide


44


, a locking ratchet


46


, a bottom coupler


48


, a top coupler


50


, a first washer


52


(0.250), a second washer


54


(0.306), an adjustment screw


56


, a thermal couple wire


58


and an RF or microwave wire


60


. Springs (not shown) permit actuating member


28


to quickly return to a non-deflected state.




In one specific embodiment of the invention, joint capsules are treated to eliminate capsule redundance. More specifically, orthopedic apparatus


36


is used to contract soft collagen tissue in the gleno-humoral joint capsule of the shoulder (

FIGS. 5

,


6


and


7


). When applied to the shoulder, there is a capsular shrinkage of the gleno-humoral joint capsule of the shoulder, and a consequent contracture of the volume, the interior circumference, of the shoulder capsule to correct for recurrent instability symptoms. The degree of capsular shrinkage is determined by the operating surgeon, based on the severity of preoperative symptoms and the condition of the capsule at the time of arthroscopic inspection. The maximum amount of collagen contraction achieved is approximately two-thirds of its original structure.




Handpiece


2


includes trocar


12


that is deflectable but it is also spring loaded. This permits handpiece


12


to be introduced into the shoulder in a straight position, percutaneously or non-percutaneously. The physician begins working and begins to deflect trocar


12


in order to reach a selected tissue site. There may be a series of deflection steps needed in order to reach the tissue site and begin apply energy to the collagen tissue. The trocar is deflected to a first position, then to a second, perhaps back to the first position and to a non-deflected position, and electrode


20


is painted back and forth, up and down a collagen tissue site. Articulating and locking members


28


and


30


, and electrode


20


with radiused edges, permits the controlled delivery energy in order to contract the collagen tissue and not ablate the tissue. Articulating and locking members


28


and


30


provide the physician with sufficient control to vary the position of electrode


20


in both difficult and easy access areas, in order to provide controlled delivery of energy to contract collagen tissue and minimize ablation. Without articulating and locking members


28


and


30


there is insufficient control of energy delivery to provide controlled ablation. The combination of the two provides a ratcheting effect and free articulation and movement of electrode


20


along a desired collagen tissue surface.





FIGS. 8 and 9

illustrated use of handpiece


10


with discs of the spine.




Handpiece


10


provides RF and microwave energy to collagen tissue in temperature ranges of about 43 to 90 degrees C, 43 to 75 degrees C and 45 to 60 degrees C.




The foregoing description of a preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in this art. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. An orthopedic apparatus, comprising:a trocar including a trocar elongated body with a trocar longitudinal axis, a trocar distal end that is laterally deflectable relative to the trocar longitudinal axis, and a trocar proximal end; an electrode positioned at the trocar distal end, the electrode delivering substantially uniform energy across an energy delivery surface of the electrode to an area of collagen fibers adjacent to the energy delivery surface to cause a controlled amount of contraction of the collagen fibers while minimizing dissociation and breakdown of the collagen fibers; and a handle positioned at a proximal end of the orthopedic device from which the trocar distally extends, the handle including an actuating member and a locking member positioned on opposing sides of the handle, the actuating member having a resting position and one or more activation positions that are defined by a locking ratchet in the handle which defines a plurality of discrete steps for the actuating member, the actuating member being operably attached to the trocar such that activation of the actuating member causes the trocar distal end to ratchet in a series of lateral deflection steps as controlled by the discrete steps of the locking ratchet, the locking member having resting position and a locking position that locks the deflected trocar distal end in place, the locking member being releasable from the locking position to the resting position or to an intermediate position to hold the activation position of the actuating member and change the deflection of the trocar distal end, wherein the actuating member and the locking member are configured to be each operable by a thumb and a finger of a single hand which holds the handle.
  • 2. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the electrode has radiused edges.
  • 3. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the electrode has no square edges.
  • 4. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:an insulating layer positioned around an exterior of the trocar that does not cover the energy delivery surface of the electrode.
  • 5. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:a non-conductive layer positioned on an opposite side of the electrode from the energy delivery surface of the electrode.
  • 6. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:a shrink tube surrounding the trocar that does not cover the energy delivery surface of the electrode.
  • 7. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the trocar is serrated.
  • 8. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the trocar is made of a memory metal.
  • 9. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the trocar is made of a memory metal.
  • 10. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the trocar extends into an interior of the handle.
  • 11. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the actuating member pivots in a lateral direction relative to a longitudinal axis of the handle.
  • 12. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the locking member is slideably positioned on an exterior surface of the handle.
  • 13. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:a coupler positioned at the trocar proximal end.
  • 14. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:a cable connector positioned at a proximal end of the handle.
  • 15. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the electrode is an RF electrode.
  • 16. The orthopedic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the electrode is a microwave electrode.
  • 17. An orthopedic apparatus, comprising:a trocar including a trocar elongated body with a trocar longitudinal axis, a trocar distal end that is laterally deflectable relative to the trocar longitudinal axis, and a trocar proximal end; an RF electrode positioned at the trocar distal end, the electrode delivering substantially uniform energy across an energy delivery surface of the electrode to an area of collagen fibers adjacent to the energy delivery surface to cause a controlled amount of contraction of the collagen fibers while minimizing dissociation and breakdown of the collagen fibers; and a handle positioned at a proximal end of the orthopedic device from which the trocar distally extends, the handle including an actuating member and a locking member positioned on opposing sides of the handle, the actuating member having a resting position and one or more activation positions that are defined by a locking ratchet in the handle which defines a plurality of discrete steps for the actuating member, the actuating member being operably attached to the trocar such that activation of the actuating member causes the trocar distal end to ratchet in a series of lateral deflection steps as controlled by the discrete steps of the locking ratchet, the locking member having a resting position and a locking position that locks the deflected trocar distal end in place, the locking member being releasable from the locking position to the resting position or to an intermediate position to hold the activation position of the actuating member and change the deflection of the trocar distal end, wherein the actuating member and the locking member are configured to be each operable by a thumb and a finger of a single hand which holds the handle; an RF energy source; and a cable to connect the RF energy source to the handle and the electrode.
  • 18. An orthopedic apparatus, comprising:a trocar including a trocar elongated body with a trocar longitudinal axis, a trocar distal end that is laterally deflectable relative to the trocar longitudinal axis and a trocar proximal end; a microwave electrode positioned at the trocar distal end, the electrode delivering substantially uniform energy across an energy delivery surface of the electrode to an area of collagen fibers adjacent to the energy delivery surface to cause a controlled amount of contraction of the collagen fibers while minimizing dissociation and breakdown of the collagen fibers; and a handle positioned at a proximal end of the orthopedic device from which the trocar distally extends, the handle including an actuating member and a locking member positioned on opposing sides of the handle, the actuating member having a resting position and one or more activation positions that are defined by a locking ratchet in the handle which defines a plurality of discrete steps for the actuating member, the actuating member being operably attached to the trocar such that activation of the actuating member causes the trocar distal end to ratchet in a series of lateral deflection steps as controlled by the discrete steps of the locking ratchet, the locking member having a resting position and a locking position that locks the deflected trocar distal end in place, the locking member being releasable from the locking position to the resting position or to an intermediate position to hold the activation position of the actuating member and change the deflection of the trocar distal end, wherein the actuating member and the locking member are configured to be each operable by a thumb and a finger of a single hand which holds the handle; a microwave energy source; and a cable to connect the microwave energy source to the handle and the electrode.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation, of application Ser. No. 08/390,873, filed Feb. 17, 1995 abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (123)
Number Name Date Kind
2090923 Wappler Aug 1937 A
3178728 Christensen Apr 1965 A
3579643 Morgan May 1971 A
3776230 Neefe Dec 1973 A
3856015 Iglesias Dec 1974 A
3867728 Substad et al. Feb 1975 A
3879767 Substad Apr 1975 A
3886600 Kahn et al. Jun 1975 A
3938198 Kahn et al. Feb 1976 A
3945375 Banko Mar 1976 A
3987499 Scharbach et al. Oct 1976 A
3992725 Homsy Nov 1976 A
4043342 Morrison, Jr. Aug 1977 A
4074718 Morrison Feb 1978 A
4085466 Goodfellow et al. Apr 1978 A
4129470 Homsy Dec 1978 A
4134406 Iglesias Jan 1979 A
4224696 Murray et al. Sep 1980 A
4224697 Murray et al. Sep 1980 A
4326529 Doss et al. Apr 1982 A
4344193 Kenny Aug 1982 A
4362160 Hiltebrandt Dec 1982 A
4375220 Matvias Mar 1983 A
4381007 Doss Apr 1983 A
4397314 Vaguine Aug 1983 A
4476862 Pao Oct 1984 A
4483338 Bloom et al. Nov 1984 A
4517965 Ellison May 1985 A
4517975 Garito et al. May 1985 A
4590934 Malis et al. May 1986 A
4593691 Lindstrom et al. Jun 1986 A
4597379 Kihn et al. Jul 1986 A
4601705 McCoy Jul 1986 A
4651734 Doss et al. Mar 1987 A
4811733 Borsanyi et al. Mar 1989 A
4815462 Clark Mar 1989 A
4838859 Strassmann Jun 1989 A
4846175 Frimberger Jul 1989 A
4873976 Schreiber Oct 1989 A
4894063 Nashef Jan 1990 A
4895148 Bays et al. Jan 1990 A
4907585 Schachar Mar 1990 A
4907589 Cosman Mar 1990 A
4924865 Bays et al. May 1990 A
4944727 McCoy Jul 1990 A
4950234 Fujioka et al. Aug 1990 A
4955882 Hakky Sep 1990 A
4966597 Cosman Oct 1990 A
4976709 Sand Dec 1990 A
4976715 Bays et al. Dec 1990 A
4998933 Eggers et al. Mar 1991 A
5007908 Rydall Apr 1991 A
5009656 Reimels Apr 1991 A
5085657 Ben-Simhon Feb 1992 A
5085659 Rydell Feb 1992 A
5098430 Fleenor Mar 1992 A
5100402 Fan Mar 1992 A
5103804 Abele et al. Apr 1992 A
5114402 McCoy May 1992 A
5152748 Chastagner Oct 1992 A
5178620 Eggers et al. Jan 1993 A
5186181 Franconi et al. Feb 1993 A
5191883 Lennox et al. Mar 1993 A
5192267 Shapira et al. Mar 1993 A
5201729 Hertzmann et al. Apr 1993 A
5201730 Easley et al. Apr 1993 A
5201731 Hakky Apr 1993 A
5213097 Zeindler May 1993 A
5230334 Klopotek Jul 1993 A
5242439 Larsen et al. Sep 1993 A
5242441 Avitall Sep 1993 A
5261906 Pennino et al. Nov 1993 A
5267994 Gentelia et al. Dec 1993 A
5273535 Edwards et al. Dec 1993 A
5275151 Shockey et al. Jan 1994 A
5279559 Barr Jan 1994 A
5284479 de Jong Feb 1994 A
5304169 Sand Apr 1994 A
5308311 Eggers et al. May 1994 A
5311858 Adair May 1994 A
5320115 Kenna Jun 1994 A
5323778 Kandarpa et al. Jun 1994 A
5334193 Nardella Aug 1994 A
5342357 Nardella Aug 1994 A
5348554 Imran et al. Sep 1994 A
5352868 Denen et al. Oct 1994 A
5354331 Schachar Oct 1994 A
5364395 West, Jr. Nov 1994 A
5366443 Eggers et al. Nov 1994 A
5366490 Edwards et al. Nov 1994 A
5382247 Cimino et al. Jan 1995 A
5397304 Truckai Mar 1995 A
5401272 Perkins Mar 1995 A
5415633 Lazarus et al. May 1995 A
5423806 Dale et al. Jun 1995 A
5433739 Sluijter et al. Jul 1995 A
5437661 Rieser Aug 1995 A
5437662 Nardella Aug 1995 A
5451223 Ben-Simhon Sep 1995 A
5458596 Lox et al. Oct 1995 A
5464023 Viera Nov 1995 A
5465737 Schachar Nov 1995 A
5484403 Yoakum et al. Jan 1996 A
5484432 Sand Jan 1996 A
5484435 Fleenor et al. Jan 1996 A
5487757 Truckai et al. Jan 1996 A
5498258 Hakky et al. Mar 1996 A
5500012 Brucker et al. Mar 1996 A
5507812 Moore Apr 1996 A
5514130 Baker May 1996 A
5524338 Martyniuk et al. Jun 1996 A
5527331 Kresch et al. Jun 1996 A
5542920 Cherif Cheikh Aug 1996 A
5569242 Lax et al. Oct 1996 A
5599356 Edwards et al. Feb 1997 A
5630839 Corbett, III et al. May 1997 A
5681282 Eggers et al. Oct 1997 A
5683366 Eggers et al. Nov 1997 A
5688270 Yates et al. Nov 1997 A
5697909 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5718702 Edwards Feb 1998 A
5782795 Bays Jul 1998 A
5810809 Rydell Sep 1998 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
3511107 Oct 1986 DE
3632197 Mar 1988 DE
39 18316 Mar 1990 DE
0 257 116 Mar 1988 EP
0 274 705 Jul 1988 EP
0 479 482 Apr 1992 EP
0 572 131 Jan 1993 EP
0 542 412 May 1993 EP
0 521 595 Jul 1993 EP
0 558 297 Sep 1993 EP
0 566 450 Oct 1993 EP
0 682 910 Nov 1995 EP
0 479 482 May 1996 EP
0 729 730 Sep 1996 EP
0 737 487 Oct 1996 EP
0 783 903 Jul 1997 EP
1122634 Sep 1956 FR
2 645 008 Oct 1990 FR
1 340 451 Dec 1973 GB
637118 Dec 1978 GB
2 164 473 Mar 1986 GB
5-42166 May 1993 JP
WO 8202488 Aug 1982 WO
8502762 Jul 1983 WO
WO 9205828 Apr 1992 WO
WO 9210142 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9301774 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9316648 Sep 1993 WO
WO 9320984 Oct 1993 WO
WO 9501814 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9520360 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9510981 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9513113 May 1995 WO
WO 9518575 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9525471 Sep 1995 WO
WO 9530377 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9534259 Dec 1995 WO
WO 9611638 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9632051 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9632885 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9634559 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9634568 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9634571 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9639914 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9706855 Feb 1997 WO
WO 9807468 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9817190 Apr 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (36)
Entry
Sluijter et al., Persistent Pain, Modern Methods of Treatment, “Treatment of Chronic Back and Neck Pain by Percutaneous Thermal Lesions”, vol. 3 (1981), pp. 141-179.
PRNewswire ( Dec. 12, 1994), “Two Physicians Perform First Outpatient Cervical Disc Procedure Using Laser Technology”.
Introduction to the LDD Disc Kit, Oct. 16, 1996, one page—photograph obliterated.
Mayer et al., “Lasers in Percutaneous Disc Surgery: Beneficial Technology or Gimmick?”, Acta Orthop. Scand., Suppl. 251 (1993) pp. 38-44.
Savitz M. A., “Same-day Microsurgical Arthroscopic Lateral-approach Laser-assisted (SMALL) Fluoroscopic Discectomy”, J. Neurosurg., vol. 80, Jun. 1994 pp. 1039-1045.
Bosacco et al., “Functional Results of Percutaneous Laser Discectomy”, American Journal of Orthopedics, Dec. 1996, pp. 825-828.
Leu et al., “Endoskopie der Wirbelsaule: Minimal-invasive Therapie”, Der Orthopade, vol. 21, (1992) pp. 267-272 no translation.
Cosman et al., “Theoretical Aspects of Radiofrequency Lesions in the Dorsal Root Entry Zone”, Neurosurgery, vol. 15, No. 6 (1984) pp. 945-950.
Gottlob et al., “Holmium:YAG Laser Ablation of Human Intervertebral Disc: Preliminary Evaluation”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 12, (1992) pp. 86-91, no translation.
Buchelt et al., “Fluorescence Guided Excimer Laser Ablation of Intervertebral Discs In Vitro”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 11, (1991) pp. 280-286.
Choy et al., “Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression: A New Therapeutic Modality”, SPINE, vol. 17, No. 8, (1992) pp. 949-956.
Sluijter, M., “The use of radio frequency lesions for pain relief in failed back patients”, Int. Disabil. Studies, vol. 10, (1988) pp. 37-43.
Shatz et al., “Preliminary Experience With Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression in the Treatment of Sciatica”, CJS JCC, vol. 38, No. 5, Oct. 1995 pp. 432-436.
Gerber et al., “Offene Laserchirurgie am Bewegungsapparat”, Der Orthopade, vol. 25, (1996) pp. 56-63 only summary translated.
Kelly L.E., Purification and Properties of a 23kDa Ca2+-binding Protein from Drosophila melanogaster, Biochem. J., vol. 271 (1990), pp. 661-666.
Sluyter, M., “Radiofrequency Lesions in the Treatment of Cervical Pain Syndromes”, Technical series publication, Radionics, Inc. (1989), pp. 2-25.
Buchelt et al., “Erb:YAG and Hol:YAG Laser Ablation of Meniscus and Intervertebral Discs”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 12, No. 4, (1992) pp. 375-381.
Phillips et al., “MR Imaging of Ho: YAG Laser Diskectomy with Histologic Correlation”, JMRI, vol. 3, No. 3, May/Jun. 1993, pp. 515-520.
Bromm et al., “Nerve fibre discharges, cerebral potentials and sensations induced by CO2 laser stimulation”, Human Neurobiol., vol. 3, (1984) pp. 33-40.
Kolarik et al., Photonucleolysis of intervertebral disc and its herniation, Zent. bl. Neurochir., vol. 51, (1990) pp. 69-71.
Vorwerck et al., “Laserablation des Nucleus pulposus: Optische Eigenschaften von Degeneriertem Bandscheibengewebe im Wellenlangenbereich von 200 bis 2200nm”, Fortschr. Roentgenstr., vol. 151, No. 6, (1989) pp. 725-728 no translation.
Wolgin et al., “Excimer Ablation of Human Intervertebral Disc at 308 Nanometers”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 9, (1989) pp. 124-131.
Davis, “Early Experience with Laser Disc Decompression”, J. Florida M. A., vol. 79, No. 1 (1992), pp. 38-39.
Quigley et al., “Laser Discectomy: Comparison of Systems”, SPINE, vol. 19, No. 3 (1994) pp. 319-322.
Mehta et al., “The treatment of chronic back pain: A preliminary survey of the effect of radiofrequency denervation of the posterior vertebral joints”, Anaesthesia, vol. 34 (1979) pp. 768-775.
Patil et al., “Percutaneous Discectomy Using the Electomagnetc Field Focusing Probe: A Feasibility Study”, Int. Surg., vol. 76 (1991), pp. 30-32.
McCulloch et al., Percutaneous radiofrequency lumbar rhizolysis (rhizotomy), CMA Journal, vol. 116, Jan. 8, 1977, pp. 30-32.
Yonezawa et al., “The System and Procedures of Percutaneous Intradiscal Laser Nucleotomy”, SPINE, vol. 15, No. 11 (1990), p. 1175-1185.
Sminia et al., “Effects of 434 MHz microwave hyperthermia applied to the rat in the region of the cervical spinal cord”, Int. J. Hyperthermia, vol. 3, No. 5 (1987) pp. 441-452.
Auhll, Richard A., “The Use of the Resectoscope in Gynecology.” Biomedical Business International, Oct. 11, 1990, pp. 91-93.
Christian, C. et al., “Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon: An Endoscopic Technique”, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 1, No. 1, Jan. 1993, pp. 50-57.
Houpt, J. et al., “Experimental Study of Temperature Distributions and Thermal Transport During Radiofrequency Current Therapy of the Intervertebral Disc”, SPINE, vol. 21, No. 15, (1996), pp. 1808-1813.
Troussier, B. et al., “Percutaneous Intradiscal Radio-Frequency Thermocoagulation: A Cadaveric Study”, SPINE, vol. 20, No. 15, (Aug. 1995), pp. 1713-1718.
Beadling, L., “Bi-Polar electrosurgical devices: Sculpting the future of arthroscopy”, Orthopedics today, vol. 17, No. 1, Jan. 1997, 4 pages.
Ellman International Mfg., Inc., 1989, Catalog, pp. 1-12, 15 20 and order forms.
Cosset, J.M., Resistive Radiofrequency (Low Frequency) Interstitial Heating (RF Technique), Interstitial Hyperthermia, Dec. 6, 1993, pp. 3-5, 37.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/390873 Feb 1995 US
Child 08/888359 US