1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to orthopedic braces.
2. Description of the Related Art
Second, like the illustrated brace 30 most knee braces are secured to the wearer's leg 32 with straps 34. These straps 34 generate friction on the leg 32 by applying a compressive force to the leg 32. But the human leg 32 has a generally conical shape, being wider at the thigh 36 and narrower at the calf 38. As a result, the compressive force applied by each strap 34 tends to make the strap 34 slide downward. Further, the conical shape provides no resistance to the natural tendency of the brace 30 to slide downward under the influence of gravity.
Third, conventional straps 34 do not contact the wearer's leg 32 at all points around the perimeter. As
To combat downward migration, some knee braces include a strap that resides on the top of the wearer's gastroc muscle 52 (
In certain knee braces, particularly those knee braces that treat and/or prevent injuries to the wearer's anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), an anti-migration strap atop the gastroc muscle can hinder the intended beneficial function of the orthosis.
A system for comfortably fitting an orthopedic brace to a wearer's limb while effectively preventing migration of the brace and without hindering the intended function of the brace would be of great benefit to those who wear orthopedic braces.
The preferred embodiments of the present orthopedic brace suspension system have several features, no single one of which is solely responsible for their desirable attributes. Without limiting the scope of this orthopedic brace suspension system as expressed by the claims that follow, its more prominent features will now be discussed briefly. After considering this discussion, and particularly after reading the section entitled “Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments,” one will understand how the features of the preferred embodiments provide advantages, which include effective brace fixation on the wearer's leg with minimal or no brace migration and minimal or no detraction from the intended function of the brace.
One embodiment of the present orthopedic brace suspension system comprises an orthopedic brace including first and second rigid uprights and at least one strap. The system further comprises a band that is adapted to extend around a wearer. The band includes at least one loop that extends transversely across the band. When the brace is worn, the at least one strap threads through the at least one loop.
Another embodiment of the present orthopedic brace suspension system comprises an orthopedic brace including first and second rigid uprights. The system further comprises a band that is adapted to extend around the wearer. The band includes at least one loop that extends transversely across the band. The system further comprises a belt that is adapted to extend around the wearer, overlapping the band and threading through the at least one loop. The system further comprises at least one suspender. When the brace is worn, the at least one suspender operably connects the belt to one of the first and second rigid uprights.
Another embodiment of the present orthopedic brace suspension system comprises an orthopedic brace including first and second rigid uprights. The system further comprises a band that is adapted to extend around a limb of a wearer such that the band contacts the entire circumference of the limb. When the brace is worn, the brace is operably connected to the band.
Another embodiment of the present orthopedic brace suspension system comprises a method of securing an orthopedic brace to a wearer. The method comprises the step of applying to the wearer a band of material. The band includes at least one loop that extends transversely across the band. The band contacts the entire circumference of the wearer. The method further comprises the step of threading a strap of the brace through the at least one loop.
Another embodiment of the present orthopedic brace suspension system comprises a method of securing an orthopedic brace to a wearer. The method comprises the step of applying to the wearer a band of material. The band contacts the entire circumference of the wearer. The method further comprises the step of applying to the wearer a belt of material. The belt overlaps the band. The method further comprises the step of connecting at least one suspender between the brace and the belt.
The preferred embodiments of the present orthopedic brace suspension system, illustrating its features, will now be discussed in detail. These embodiments depict the novel and non-obvious orthopedic brace suspension system shown in the accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. These drawings include the following figures, in which like numerals indicate like parts:
With reference to
The first and second ends 62, 64 of the band meet beneath the wearer's patella 68 (
With reference to
With reference to
At least part of an outward facing surface 82 (
With reference to
The ends 86 of each suspender 58 preferably include attachment apparatus 88 that is adapted to engage attachment apparatus 90 (
With reference to
The suspenders 58 link the brace frame 60 to the belt 56. They loop around the belt 56 and connect to the frame 60 at a location just below the belt 56. The suspenders 58 are able to swing in the anterior-posterior direction. This arrangement allows vertical force to be transferred through the suspenders 58 to support the brace 92, but does not allow anterior-posterior forces to be transferred between the band 54 and the frame 60.
The band 54 and belt 56 are positioned above the girth of the wearer's gastroc muscle 70. Neither the band 54 nor the belt 56 attaches directly to the brace frame 60. Instead the brace 92 is suspended from the band 54 and the belt 56. The band 54 and belt 56 are advantageously able to remain snug against the wearer's leg 66 while preventing any anterior-posterior forces from being transmitted through the band 54.
The first and second ends 96, 98 of the band 94 meet beneath the wearer's patella 68 (
The band 94 includes a plurality of loops 104 that extend in a transverse direction across the band 94. In the illustrated embodiment, the band 94 includes three such loops 104, with one loop 104 being positioned on an anterior portion of the band 94 (
With reference to
The above presents a description of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the present orthopedic brace suspension system, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains to make and use this system. This system is, however, susceptible to modifications and alternate constructions from that discussed above that are fully equivalent. Consequently, this system is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed. On the contrary, this system covers all modifications and alternate constructions coming within the spirit and scope of the system as generally expressed by the following claims, which particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter of the system.
This application claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/534,584, filed on Jan. 6, 2004, and to provisional application Ser. No. 60/557,149, filed on Mar. 29, 2004. The entire contents of each of these applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2270685 | Miller | Jan 1942 | A |
3046981 | Biggs, Jr. et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3055359 | Palmer | Sep 1962 | A |
3093131 | Kashyap | Jun 1963 | A |
3350719 | McClure, Jr. | Nov 1967 | A |
3416519 | Dowers | Dec 1968 | A |
3958569 | Vosburgh | May 1976 | A |
3970081 | Applegate, Jr. | Jul 1976 | A |
3976057 | Barclay | Aug 1976 | A |
3993056 | Rabischong et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4027666 | Marx | Jun 1977 | A |
4041940 | Frankel et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4090508 | Gaylord, Jr. | May 1978 | A |
4169467 | Rabischong et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4295466 | Prout | Oct 1981 | A |
4361142 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4372298 | Lerman | Feb 1983 | A |
4407496 | Johnson | Oct 1983 | A |
4425912 | Harper | Jan 1984 | A |
4436099 | Raftopoulos | Mar 1984 | A |
4506661 | Foster | Mar 1985 | A |
4556053 | Irons | Dec 1985 | A |
4602627 | Vito et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4607628 | Dashefsky | Aug 1986 | A |
4633867 | Kausek et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4643176 | Mason et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4651722 | Karczewski | Mar 1987 | A |
4686969 | Scott | Aug 1987 | A |
4697583 | Mason et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4718665 | Airy et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4732143 | Kausek et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4751920 | Mauldin et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4768500 | Mason et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4781179 | Colbert | Nov 1988 | A |
4791916 | Paez | Dec 1988 | A |
4796610 | Cromartie | Jan 1989 | A |
4801138 | Airy et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802466 | Meyers et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4803975 | Meyers | Feb 1989 | A |
4805606 | McDavid, III | Feb 1989 | A |
4817588 | Bledsoe | Apr 1989 | A |
4838251 | Chignon et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4854308 | Drillio | Aug 1989 | A |
4887590 | Logue et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4930499 | Rowe | Jun 1990 | A |
4940044 | Castillo | Jul 1990 | A |
4941462 | Lindberg | Jul 1990 | A |
4955369 | Bledsoe et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4986264 | Miller | Jan 1991 | A |
5000169 | Swicegood et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002045 | Spademan | Mar 1991 | A |
5022391 | Weidenburner | Jun 1991 | A |
5025782 | Salerno | Jun 1991 | A |
5052379 | Airy et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5058574 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5078127 | Daneman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085210 | Smith, III | Feb 1992 | A |
5107824 | Rogers et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5135469 | Castillo | Aug 1992 | A |
5224924 | Urso | Jul 1993 | A |
5230700 | Humbert et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5267946 | Singer et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5277697 | France et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5277698 | Taylor | Jan 1994 | A |
5302169 | Taylor | Apr 1994 | A |
5306230 | Bodine | Apr 1994 | A |
5328446 | Bunnell et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334135 | Grim et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5358469 | Patchel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372575 | Sebastian | Dec 1994 | A |
5385538 | Mann | Jan 1995 | A |
5400806 | Taylor | Mar 1995 | A |
5433699 | Smith, III | Jul 1995 | A |
5437619 | Malewicz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457891 | Taylor | Oct 1995 | A |
5458565 | Tillinghast, III et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462517 | Mann | Oct 1995 | A |
5558627 | Singer et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562605 | Taylor | Oct 1996 | A |
5586970 | Morris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599288 | Shirley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5626557 | Mann | May 1997 | A |
5649901 | DiPietro et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658241 | Deharde et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658244 | Townsend et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5672152 | Mason et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5741220 | Brink | Apr 1998 | A |
5749840 | Mitchell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5782780 | Mason et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797864 | Taylor | Aug 1998 | A |
5857989 | Smith, III | Jan 1999 | A |
5865775 | Peoples et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5943705 | Sink | Aug 1999 | A |
5980435 | Joutras et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001074 | Kenney | Dec 1999 | A |
6045521 | Saitoh et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6110138 | Shirley | Aug 2000 | A |
RE37209 | Hensley et al. | Jun 2001 | E |
6336909 | Gildersleeve et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6387066 | Whiteside | May 2002 | B1 |
6428495 | Lynott | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478758 | Hassler | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478760 | Darcey | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485448 | Lamping et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6623439 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641549 | Darcey | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6793641 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7156818 | Salmon et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20020183672 | Enzerink et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040167452 | Mason et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3 511 250 | Nov 1985 | DE |
0 290 409 | Nov 1988 | EP |
6380 | Jun 1903 | JP |
2000197654 | Jul 2000 | JP |
WO 8604228 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 9009157 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO 9525489 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9814144 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 03103546 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050148918 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60534584 | Jan 2004 | US | |
60557149 | Mar 2004 | US |