The disclosure relates to an orthopedic device, and more particularly to an orthopedic device for dynamically treating or supporting injuries of the knee.
Stabilization of the knee joint (femur and tibia) is understood to be created primarily by four key ligaments: the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the lateral collateral (LCL) ligament. The ACL is much better known, in part because injuries to the ACL are much more commonly diagnosed. The ACL keeps the tibia from sliding too far forward (anterior) with respect to the femur. Conversely, as depicted in
PCL tears are graded by severity (I, II or III) of the injury. The grade is classified by the degree of increased posterior tibia translation compared with that of the contralateral knee. In general, grading of the injury corresponds to the following:
Grade 1: The ligament is mildly damaged and has been slightly stretched, but is still able to help keep the knee joint stable. 1-5 mm.
Grade 2: The ligament stretches to the point where it becomes loose. This is often referred to as a partial tear of the ligament. 6-10 mm
Grade 3: This type of injury is most commonly referred to as a complete tear of the ligament. The ligament has been torn into two pieces, and the knee joint is unstable. 10 mm and greater.
As illustrated in
PCL knee injuries often go surgically untreated, and a common form of treatment is to permit the PCL to heal on its own. When a PCL is torn, the proximal end of the tibia has a tendency to shift posteriorly which causes strain on the healing PCL, and results in a healed PCL longer than it was prior to injury. The healed knee may experience slack wherein the proximal end of the tibia shifts posteriorly after healing, causing a feeling of instability in the patient, and increasing the risk for further injury.
PCL injuries often are not isolated, and it has been found that concomitant posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries are common, particularly in a trauma setting. The PLC resists excessive varus and external rotation forces in the knee, and the PLC has a secondary role in resisting posterior translation of the tibia. When an injury of the PLC is combined with an injury of the PCL, the primary and secondary restraining effects of a tight PCL are lost at high knee-flexion angles. The PLC and PCL play a symbiotic role in resisting excessive external rotation and posterior translation of the proximal tibia.
The natural history of chronic PLC injuries includes varus thrust gait, posterolateral instability, and developing arthrosis. Similar to PCL-deficient knees, developing arthrosis in PLC-deficient knees is likely due to altered knee kinematics and increased peek compartment pressures.
An orthopedic device, such as a knee brace that provides support to the back of the upper calf throughout the range of motion, may be used to prevent this unwanted shifting. In the post-operative patient (or even the recently injured patient, who has not had, or will have, surgery), this may mitigate the lengthening of the PCL during healing, and prevent the shifting problems described above. In the patient having a PCL that has healed in a lengthened state, the brace may prevent the undesirable shifting described above, giving the patient an added feeling of stability, and a decreasing risk of further injury.
Unfortunately due to poor diagnostic methods, there is uncertainty as to the annual volume of PCL tears (estimated between 3% and 20% of all ligament injuries). PCL injuries have historically been considered to have benign clinical consequence. Thus if the PCL tear had been diagnosed, it would often go untreated since it resides outside the joint capsule and has the ability to heal itself. Unfortunately, when left to heal on its own, the PCL typically heals in an elongated length, resulting in joint instability.
Recent estimates place the number of diagnosed PCL tears in the US near 25,000 annually. When compared to the number of ACL tears, it places the percentage at roughly 10%. The question still remains as to how many knees go undiagnosed. The problem is that if an effort is not made to repair the ligament to maintain its normal length, it will heal in a stretched position, creating excessive movement between femoral and tibial joint surfaces; this raises the likelihood of degenerative changes in the knee leading to osteoarthritis.
PCL reconstruction has been recommended by some clinicians for more severe injuries, or for PCL injuries combined with other types of injuries. Even though some in-vitro biomechanical studies have reported that PCL reconstruction can restore knee biomechanics in a model with an isolated injury, the actual surgical management of PCL injuries has been problematic; a high number of patients continue to experience residual knee laxity after surgery.
Loads on the PCL have been shown to be dynamic in nature. As the knee is moved for instance, from a position of full extension to 90° of flexion, the tension on the normal intact PCL ligament increases. This increased tension helps to keep the tibia properly positioned with respect to the femur. When the PCL is damaged, it is not able to provide this increased tension and may allow the tibia to shift posteriorly. As mentioned above, if a brace could apply an external force to the posterior calf and in proper measure, it would provide the forces necessary to effectively co-locate the femur and tibia. It has been found that one possible cause for poor patient outcomes in treatment of the acute PCL injury is that the dynamic loads pull the tibia posteriorly during the healing process, and cause the PCL to heal in an elongated length. This may also result in an increased incidence of future osteoarthritis.
A properly designed dynamic brace could prevent or mitigate this occurrence. If surgery is required, this brace could offer protection for the reconstructed PCL throughout its healing process. Since the PCL is extracapsular and has the ability to heal on its own, such a brace may potentially prevent the need for surgical management. For the patient who has had a previous PCL injury and experiences joint laxity as no subsequent surgical intervention was undertaken, this brace may also provide enhanced stability and confidence. Ultimately, such an orthopedic device could benefit patients with all levels of PCL injuries. Another cause of poor outcomes is due to the gravity effect. As the patient lays supine and lifts the leg with the knee extended, the tibia falls posteriorly. This effect can be a regular occurrence while the patient is in the non weight bearing post operative phase where they can regularly experience this posterior shifting of the tibia simply by laying in bed.
The posterior shift of the tibia can be detrimental to the healing PCL and cause undue tension leading to a non-anatomical lengthening of the ligament. There are many PCL brace options available, however the known solutions lack certain critical functional requirements. Most options are static braces that only provide a constant anterior force through the entire arc of knee motion. While these static braces are capable of providing some stability to PCL-deficient knees, they do not adjust the stability in high degrees of knee flexion. Tension within the PCL varies through the knee arc motion.
Therefore, it is proposed herein to provide an orthopedic device in an exemplary form of a PCL brace that meets the certain critical functional requirements to effectively treat a PCL injury of the knee, and concomitant other injuries of the knee such as the PLC and patellofemoral pain. The proposed device will be to help support the functional healing of an acute PCL injury post operatively or non-operatively. Another purpose is to maintain the proper bone alignment of the femur and tibia for the patient with poorly healed/elongated PCL. Thus, the proposed device would be appropriate for all new PCL injuries and all those patients who never received surgery to preserve PCL length.
In accordance with various orthopedic device embodiments described herein, an exemplary dynamic brace may be used in at least the following scenarios: (1) protection of the PCL post operatively during the healing process (3-6 months), such that once the PCL has been confirmed to be properly healed, the brace would be no longer needed unless the patient desires a brace for additional stability during activity; (2) protection of the PCL non-operatively whereby the brace provides dynamic stability allowing the PCL to heal under proper tension without surgery; (3) protection of the PCL for those individuals whose PCL has healed in an elongated position, whereby the brace provides dynamic stability of the PCL for activities; (4) reducing patellofemoral compartment pressures in PCL- and combined PCL/PLC-deficient knees, particularly at high degrees of knee flexion.
In accordance with an embodiment of the dynamic device or brace, unlike in static braces, a dynamic device is a knee brace arranged for dynamically treating a knee to provide increased anterior force and improved posterior stability at higher degrees of knee flexion to better mimic the natural activity of the PCL and/or the PLC. By improving the knee kinematics by a dynamic brace, the medial and patellofemoral compartment pressures in PCL- or PCL/PLC or other deficient knees can be normalized and possibly reduce the incidence of knee arthrosis.
The brace has a central axis and a frontal plane parallel to and intersecting the central axis and dividing the brace along first and second sides. The brace has a medial-lateral plane dividing the device into medial and lateral sides, which are generally oriented perpendicular to the frontal plane. The brace includes a hinge assembly, a frame having an upper cuff and a lower cuff spaced apart from and connected by the hinge assembly. A dynamic calf shell is connected to the frame and extends along the first side of the brace.
An adjustment system is connected to the dynamic calf shell and includes a tensioning element operatively engaging the dynamic calf shell and the hinge assembly. The dynamic calf shell is drawn anteriorly, creating an anteriorly directed force on the proximal tibia in the sagittal plane as the orthopedic device goes from an extension orientation to a flexion orientation. It has been found from this orientation that as the tensioning element shortens when the knee flexes, there is a generation of increased calf loads that in turn urges the tibia anteriorly to compensate for an impaired PCL.
The brace further comprises a strut segment connecting the lower cuff to the hinge assembly, and the tensioning element extends along at least part of the strut segment, preferably along the second side. In the case of arranging the brace for treating an impaired PCL, the tensioning element extends along the anterior side of the strut segment. The dynamic calf shell is secured to the strut segment and the tensioning element extends along at least part of the dynamic calf shell, with the dynamic calf shell being located on the distal posterior side of the brace when configured for treating the PCL.
In accordance with an embodiment, the tensioning element has a first end anchored to the hinge assembly. The hinge assembly may include a pair of rotation axes, with the tensioning element extending between the rotation axes. The hinge assembly is preferably located along the frontal plane when the device is in an extension orientation; the tensioning element crosses the frontal plane within the hinge assembly. Further yet, the hinge assembly may define a pair of rotation axes and a main axis generally perpendicular to the rotation axes. The tensioning element may extend between the pair of rotation axes and cross the main axis.
The hinge assembly may include a hinge cover defining an entry aperture through which extends the tensioning element. The entry aperture is preferably located on the second side of the frontal plane, and thereby on a side of the frontal plane opposite to the dynamic calf shell. The hinge cover may define a middle opening with the tensioning element extending into the hinge assembly and anchored at or near the middle opening of the hinge cover.
The adjustment system may include a tightening device arranged for increasing and decreasing tension in the tensioning element. According one variation, the tightening device is a dial-tensioning device arranged for preselected and incremental ratcheting rotational adjustment of the tensioning element. In this variation, the tensioning element is preferably a cable that can be wound and unwound by the dial-tensioning device. In variations, the tightening device comprises straps or other ratcheting means, such as a linear ratchet, or a combination thereof that permits adjusting the tension in the tensioning element.
The brace may further include an elongate strut segment connecting the lower cuff to the hinge assembly and having a guide element orienting the tensioning element from a lateral direction substantially perpendicular to the strut segment to a longitudinal direction generally parallel to the strut segment.
Further yet, the brace may include wings extending from the upper cuff located on the second side of the device toward the first side of the device. A strap carrying a pad, an insert forming in part a shell or combination thereof may extend from the upper cuff on opposed medial and lateral sides thereof and over the wings.
According to an embodiment, the first side of the brace is located on a posterior side of the device and the upper and lower cuffs are located on the first side of the brace, particularly when the brace is configured for treating a PCL. The upper cuff may have a lateral strut extending more proximally than a medial strut, thereby creating a peak at the lateral side of the upper cuff. As noted above, the dynamic calf shell is likewise located on the posterior side. The device further comprises upper and lower straps connected to the upper and lower cuffs, respectively, and extending about the second side of the device located on an anterior side of the device.
The brace may also include a lower tibia shell located on the second side of the device. The lower tibia shell may have a semi-rigid and resilient a generally V-shaped insert. The lower tibia shell is arranged to counteract the dynamic calf shell as the device goes from an extension orientation to a flexion orientation. Moreover, in the orientation as a PCL brace, the lower shell is adapted as a tibial shell such that the V-shaped insert prevents sharp pressure points at a tip of the anterior leg corresponding to the tibia that may occur with a conventional strap, and more evenly distributes pressure on the lower leg due to the counteracting forces of the dynamic calf shell.
The orthopedic device may be adapted to treat other knee infirmities by switching the location of the dynamic calf shell, the orientation of the tensioning element, and the location of the cuffs, shells and straps.
In different embodiments, the orthopedic device is arranged with a dynamic femoral shell that counteracts with a dynamic calf shell, in which both the dynamic femoral and calf shells are secured to one another by the adjustment system. According to one variation, the dynamic femoral shell is located on the anterior side of the frontal plane whereas the dynamic calf shell is located on the posterior side of the frontal plane.
In another embodiment, the orthopedic device is arranged for dynamically treating a knee, with the device having a central axis and a frontal plane parallel to and intersecting the central axis and dividing the device along first and second sides. The device has a medial-lateral plane dividing the device into medial and lateral sides and generally oriented perpendicular to the frontal plane. The device includes a hinge assembly, a frame having first and second frame components spaced apart from and connected to one another by the hinge assembly, a strap system extending between medial and lateral sides of the first frame component, and at least one tensioning element having a first end secured to the strap system and a second end coupled to the hinge assembly, wherein articulation of the hinge assembly pulls the strap system toward the frontal plane by the at least one tensioning element.
The strap system preferably includes a first bracket upon which the first end of a first one of the at least one tensioning element is anchored, and a second bracket upon which a first end of a second one of the at least one tensioning element is anchored. The strap system includes a strap suspended between the first and second brackets, with the strap being adjustable in length between the first and second brackets thereby reducing a length defined between the first and second brackets. A shell may be secured to the strap between the first and second brackets, and arranged for interfacing with anatomy of the user.
The at least one tensioning element is preferably slidably coupled to the first frame component so as to direct the strap system toward the frontal plane. The at least one tensioning element may be arranged to extend over a portion of the first frame component proximate the hinge assembly. The strap system and an anchor point of the connection of the second end of at least one tensioning element at the hinge assembly are preferably located on a first side of the orthopedic device relative to the frontal plane. The second end of the at least one tensioning element may secure to a hinge plate of the hinge assembly.
The at least one tensioning element may include a first tensioning element securing to a first side of the strap system and coupling to a first hinge of the hinge assembly, and a second tensioning element securing to a second side of the strap system and coupling to a second hinge of the hinge assembly. The first and second tensioning elements may be discretely separate from one another.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings.
It should be noted that the drawing figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, but instead are drawn to provide a better understanding of the components thereof, and are not intended to be limiting in scope, but rather to provide exemplary illustrations. It should further be noted that the figures illustrate exemplary embodiments of an orthopedic device and the components thereof, and in no way limit the structures or orientations of an orthopedic device and components thereof according to the present disclosure.
A better understanding of the different embodiments described herein may be had from the following description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to like elements.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrative embodiments are shown in the drawings and are described below in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, combinations, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
It will be understood that, unless a term is expressly defined in this patent to possess a described meaning, there is no intent to limit the meaning of such term, either expressly or indirectly, beyond its plain or ordinary meaning.
Numerous orthopedic device embodiments and components for use therewith are described herein, with particular focus given to devices and components directed to the knee joint and surrounding areas. The orthopedic device embodiments may serve in protective, preventative or remedial capacities. While the orthopedic device is described within the context of a preferred embodiment that is directed to treating the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), many of the features described herein may be extended to orthopedic devices and components that secure other joints and body parts, and to other complications of the knee.
The orthopedic device embodiments and components for use therewith may be dimensioned to accommodate different types, shapes and sizes of human joints and appendages. In addition, embodiments may be modified to orient principal forces exerted by strap systems of the embodiments at any desirable location to secure the device onto a leg in order to stabilize the knee.
The knee joint comprises two joints, lateral and medial, between the femur and tibia, and one arthrodial joint between the patella and femur. The primary movements of the knee comprise flexion, i.e., rearward rotational movement of the tibia relative to the femur, and extension, i.e., forward rotational movement of the tibia relative to the femur.
For explanatory purposes, each orthopedic device embodiment or component thereof described herein may be divided into sections which are denoted by general anatomical terms for the human body. Such anatomical terms are provided to distinguish various elements of the device embodiments from one another, but which are not to be considered to limit the scope of the disclosure.
Each of these terms is used in reference to a human leg, by way of example, which is divided in similar sections with a proximal-distal plane generally extending along the meniscus of the knee between the femur and tibia. The terms “proximal” and “distal” generally refer to locations of the device that correspond to the location of leg relative to the point of attachment of the leg to the body. The terms “upper” and “lower” may be used in combination with “proximal” and “distal” to connote gradations in location of “proximal” and “distal.” The location whereat the device corresponds to the knee joint is used herein to generally delimit the proximal and distal sections of the device.
The embodiments of the knee device can also be considered to fall within “anterior” and “posterior” sections by an anterior-posterior plane. The anterior-posterior plane generally corresponds to the coronal or frontal plane of a human leg which lies along the central longitudinal axis of a body. A posterior side or element is therefore located behind this anterior-posterior plane, whereas an anterior side or element is located in front of the anterior-posterior plane.
The terms “inwardly” or “inner” commonly used herein to distinguish the side of the device that may be directed to the posterior side of the device and specifically adjacent to the leg of the wearer of the device. Contrariwise, the terms “outwardly” or “outer” are used to denote the side of the device that is opposite to the inwardly side.
The terms “medial” and “lateral” are relative terms that are generally understood as indicating location with respect to the midsaggital plane or midline. Therefore, elements that are located near the midline are referred to as “medial” and those elements that are further from the midline are considered to be “lateral.” The term “central” is used to denote the area along the midline of a joint thereby dividing and sharing regions of the medial and lateral regions.
From these terms, it follows that the anterior section of the device has the following quadrants: (I) proximal-medial, (II) distal-medial, (III) distal-lateral, and (IV) proximal-lateral. The posterior section of the device has the following quadrants: (V) proximal-medial, (VI) distal-medial, (VII) distal-lateral, and (VIII) proximal-lateral. Structural members and features thereof that will fall within one of the quadrants are specifically referenced in relation to such quadrant, either in its entirety or partially.
The device has a center axis X-X when in the extension position which is formed at the intersection of the anterior-posterior plane and the medial-lateral plane.
The terms “rigid” and “flexible” may be used herein to distinguish characteristics of portions of the brace. The term “rigid” is intended to denote that the frame is generally devoid of flexibility. Within the context of frame members that are “rigid,” it is intended to indicate that they may break if bent with sufficient force. On the other hand, the term “flexible” is intended to denote that features are capable of repeated bending. The term “resilient” may be used to qualify such flexible features as generally returning to the initially molded shape without permanent deformation.
The anatomical and characteristic terms described herein are not intended to detract from the normal understanding of such terms as readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art of orthotics. Moreover, the elements of the embodiments described herein are intended to embrace embodiments that generally correspond to the aforementioned anatomical sections. In other words, it is understood that the elements of the device embodiments described herein may deviate from falling exactly within the confines of the aforementioned anatomical sections.
In accordance with a first embodiment illustrated in
A first upper strap 38 extends about the anterior side of the brace and connects to the first cuff 12 to effectively form a circumferential loop about the upper end of the brace. Similarly, a second lower strap 40 extends about the posterior side of the brace and connects to the second cuff 14 to effectively form a circumferential loop about the lower end of the brace.
The brace includes a first, anterior dynamic femoral shell 16 located between the first cuff 12 and the hinge assembly 20, and a second, posterior dynamic calf shell 18 located between the second cuff 14 and the hinge assembly 20. The first and second dynamic shells 16, 18 are dynamically secured to an adjustment system 26 that urges the first and second dynamic shells 16, 18 toward one another upon regulation of the adjustment system 26.
The first cuff 12 is preferably arranged on the posterior side of the brace such that it counteracts with the first dynamic shell 16 which is located on the anterior side of the brace. Likewise, the second cuff 14 is preferably arranged on the anterior side of the brace whereas the second dynamic shell 18 is located on the posterior side of the brace. The first cuff 12 is preferably spaced apart from the first dynamic shell by a distance 23, as is the second cuff 14 is preferably spaced apart from the second dynamic shell by a distance 25, the exact distance varying depending on the size of the brace and the length of a wearer's leg.
As illustrated, suitable cuff and shell liners 42 may be included to provide compressive relief to the wearer when straps and tensioning elements are tensioned over a wearer's leg. The hinge assembly 20 may likewise include condyle pads 44 which provide cushioning to the lateral and medial sides of the knee. The cuffs and shells may include ventilation features, such as in a series or pattern of openings 46, so as to allow better breathability when the brace is worn against the leg of the wearer.
The cuffs and shells may be formed from multiple materials or sections having different rigidity or hardness. For example, the core 48 of each dynamic shell may have greater rigidity than an edge portion 50 which may be formed of a less rigid material. Various combinations and methods for forming such multiple material or section cuffs and shells can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,727,174 and 7,749,183, and U.S. patent application publication no. 2009/0076426, each incorporated herein by reference.
The adjustment system 26 includes a tensioning element 29, such as a cable, that is secured to and adjusted by a tightening device 28 to adjust the length of the cable 29. In a preferred embodiment, the tightening device 28 is a dial-tensioning device 28 arranged for incremental and preselected adjustment in the tension of the tensioning element. The dial-tensioning device may be rotated clockwise to decrease the length of the cable 29 and thereby increase the overall tension of the adjustment system 20. To decrease the overall tension of the adjustment system, the dial-tensioning device 28 may be rotated counterclockwise to increase the length of the cable 29. The dial-tensioning device may be provided by BOA Technology Inc. and is also described in US 2009/0287128, which is incorporated herein by reference and belongs to the assignee of this disclosure. The tightening device is not limited to the example provided above, and may comprise straps, cables, brackets, hook and loop fastener systems, or ratcheting means, such as a linear, ladder or buckle ratchet, or a combination thereof, that permits adjusting the tension in the tensioning element
The first and second dynamic shells 16, 18 are slidingly and pivotally secured to the strut assembly 19 along slots formed by the first and second dynamic shells 16, 18. As the dial-tensioning device 28 is regulated to adjust the tension in the cable 29, the first and second dynamic shells 16, 18 are urged toward one another, while sliding along the slots, and effectively moving relative to the strut assembly 19. The dynamic shells are also able to pivot relative to the strut assemblies in order to accommodate flexion of the knee and leg.
The dial-tensioning device 28 is preferably centrally secured to the frontal or outer surface of the first dynamic shell 16, and the cable 29 extends from both lateral and medial sides of the dial-tensioning device 28 to the first strut segments 22. The upper dynamic shell 16 may include upper guide channels 34 that maintain the direction of the cable 29 toward the strut segments 22. The cable 29 is received on the first strut segments 22 by upper guides 30 which in turn direct the cable 29 toward the hinge assembly 20. The cable 29 passes through the hinge assembly 20 and extends to lower guides 32 located on the second strut segments 24 which in turn direct the cable 29 about the second dynamic shell 18 and through a lower guide channel 36 located or formed on the frontal or outer surface of the second dynamic shell 18.
It will be noted that ends of the cable 29 are preferably retained within the dial-tensioning device 28 and the portion of the cable 29 outside the dial-tensioning device 28 extends continuously about the brace without interruption. Tensioning of the cable 29 by the dial-tensioning device 28 occurs simultaneously across both the first and second dynamic shells 16, 18. While this is the preferred embodiment, it will be noted that the orthopedic device is not limited to a single cable or a single dial tensioner, but it is envisioned that multiple cables and dial tensioners may be used to urge or move the first and second dynamic shells relative to the strut assembly.
The channel routes 60, 62, 64, 66 are located on the anterior side of the hinge cover 52, and are offset relative to the hinge center demarcated by a longitudinal hinge main axis Y-Y. The relationship of the channel routes relative to the hinge center determines the level of force generated by the adjustment system and hence the level of force exerted by the first and second dynamic shells on the tibia of the wearer of the brace. The placement of where the cable runs with respect to the hinge center will vary the excursion of the cable and thus impart a change in the dynamic force it can impart on the leg.
It follows that the farther in front of the hinge axis, the greater the excursion of the cable and thus the greater the dynamic force it can exert on the second dynamic shell and the first dynamic shell simultaneously, thus creating a higher PCL stabilizing force for the same range of motion. The dynamic force achieved by placement of the cable relative to the hinge center is separate and distinct from merely tensioning the cable by the dial tensioner.
As shown in
Turning to Example 2, the cable is placed in a channel route again farthest from the hinge center; however the adjustment system is not tensioned and does not effectively exert any tension on the leg when the leg is in extension. A high force is again exerted on the leg as the leg goes into flexion however the force is less than in Example 1 due to there being no tension on the leg due to the adjustment system before flexion.
Referring to Example 3, the cable is placed in a channel route closer to the hinge center, and again the adjustment system is not tensioned and does not effectively exert any tension on the leg when the leg is in extension. A lower force than in Example 2 is exerted on the leg.
Lastly, in Example 4, the cable is placed along the hinge center and there is no initial tension exerted by the adjustment system. From this configuration, there is little or no dynamic tensioning exerted by the dynamic tensioning system as the leg goes into flexion.
When dosing the brace on the leg of a wearer, certain considerations are made regarding the dosing including the knee laxity, the activity of the wearer, and the size of the wearer's leg and anatomy. The brace may be adapted to permit the practitioner to set the tension on the brace, particularly by the adjustment system, the dynamic tensioning system, or both, and to assure that the wearer has some visual or audio notification of correct adjustment of the brace.
One option for assuring correct dosage of the brace is to set a series of indicia, such as numbers or symbols, on the cable that can be relied upon to match a certain load that the brace may exert on the wearer from extension and a range of flexion. Another option is to provide a load sensor in the cable that indicates through audio or visually whether a load on the knee and leg is too high. Yet another option is to provide sensors that track the distance of the cable or the relationship among the dynamic shells so that adjustment of the cable or shells does not exceed a certain threshold.
It will be noted that the device is not limited to an actual hinge mechanism for securing the first and second strut segments to one another and to simulate movements of the knee. Instead, the embodiments in
The upper cuff 112 has a peak side generally located on the posterior lateral side and formed in part by a lateral segment, which is higher than a medial segment and linked by a sloping segment. The arrangement of the upper cuff is advantageous in that it contributes to medial and lateral stability as the lever or lateral segment increases in size. The arrangement also allows for coverage of more femoral and thigh soft tissue for better distributing pressure over the upper leg UL. The lower height of the medial segment provides for a lower profile on the medial side as it is more desired for improved comfort between soft tissue for right and left legs, thereby minimizing the side of the cuff to avoid bumping the medial side of the other leg.
In order to counteract the upper and lower cuffs 112, 114, the brace includes an upper femoral shell 128 connected to the upper strut 122 by a strap 136 and covered with padding 139, and a lower tibial shell 130 including a generally V-shaped insert 152 and is connected to the lower cuff 114 or lower strut 124 by a strap 148 and a bracket 150 such as a D-ring. The lower tibial shell may likewise be covered with padding 131. A padding wrap 135 preferably circumferentially extends around the lower leg LL and extends between a dynamic calf shell 116 and the lower cuff 114. The padding wrap 135 may be adjustable and tightenable over the lower leg, and may be integrally connected between the locations corresponding to the dynamic shell and the lower cuff.
The brace 110 includes upper wings 132 extending generally from the upper cuff 112 and projecting toward and wrapping about at least a portion of the anterior side of the brace. Padding 137 is provided in combination with the wings 132, and the wings are more rigid and resilient than the padding 137. A strap 145 may extend over the wings 132 or connect to the wings so as to extend about the anterior side of the brace. Alternatively, the strap 145 may be connected to the padding 137 or be formed as part of the padding 137 so as to define a wrap about the upper leg.
The wings are arranged to cover more surface of the upper leg, particularly on the anterior side of the leg than a simple strap and work to contain soft tissue around the femur, and prevent the strap from digging into the soft tissue. In many conventional braces, straps have a tendency to submerge or press deeply into soft tissue of the thigh which causes discomfort and may lead to less stable attachment to the thigh. The wings are particularly arranged on at least the medial and lateral sides, and reaching into a portion of the anterior side of the thigh to avoid locations at which conventional straps are prone to pressing deeply into the soft tissue.
The adjustment system 118 is arranged on the dynamic calf shell 116, which is generally arranged over the upper and fleshy portion of a wearer's posterior calf. The dynamic shell 116 is connected to the lower strut 124 by a strap 144, and may be pivotally connected or connected in a fixed orientation relative to the lower strut 124.
The adjustment system 118 includes a tensioning element 126, such as the aforementioned cable in other embodiments described herein. When the brace is arranged in extension, the cable 126 extends from the tightening device 118 in a generally lateral direction by extending through guides 134 located on the dynamic shell 116, and is redirected in a generally longitudinal direction by guides 141 located on the lower strut 124 to an aperture 138 on a hinge cover 140 of the hinge 120. The adjustment system may be arranged in accordance with any of the examples described herein.
The guides 134 may comprise any number of types of guides for routing the cable 126 to the lower strut 124. It is preferable that the cable 126 is arranged laterally relative to the lower strut 124 and received by the guide or series of guides 141 located on the lower strut 124. The guides 134, 141 may comprise tubes, brackets, channels and any other type of form that will permit the cable to be directed in a straight orientation (in the case of the guides 134) and curved or reoriented orientation (in the case of the guides 141) located on the struts which essentially direct the cable in a direction perpendicular to the guides 134. While the embodiment of
Referring to
The relationship to the entry aperture and the axis is similar to the embodiments discussed above in connection with the embodiments of
Taken from the inner side of the hinge cover in
As schematically shown in
In referring to
As the applied or dynamic force is applied above the knee in the variation of
As shown in both
The orthopedic device 180 preferably includes device elements such as straps, shells, a frame or cuffs 194, 196 for counteracting the applied or dynamic forces FA1 Pos. and FA2 Pos. exerted by the components from the anterior side of the orthopedic device and directed posteriorly. The elements 194, 196 preferably provide counterforces FC1 Ant. and FC2 Ant. directed anteriorly to counteract the applied or dynamic force. Suitable other device features 197, 198, such as straps, aid in maintaining the orthopedic device on the leg of the user.
As shown in
The upper and lower frame components, as well as the hinges, may have a construction similar to the embodiments described in U.S. Pat. No. D577,828, granted Sep. 30, 2008 and U.S. patent application publication no. 2008/0195013, published Aug. 14, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. As will be discussed, an advantage to the embodiment of the orthopedic device 200 is that various components thereof can be adapted to retrofit various orthopedic devices having different brace frame components and contours, particularly those orthopedic devices having a double-upright configuration.
Referring to
The first end 215 of the tensioning element 212A is anchored at an anchor point 220 on a first bracket 226 securing to the shell 222. The tensioning element 212A is movably secured to the first strut 203A so as to allow it to adjust relative to movement by the upper frame component 202 relative to the lower frame component 204. For example, in the illustrated embodiment of
The second end 216 of the tensioning element 212 secures to a hinge plate 214 of the hinge 206, preferably at an anterior side or end. As shown in
The orthopedic device is not limited to the second end 216 securing to the hinge plate 214, but may be secured to any of hinge components that remain stationary or translate relative to rotation of the first and second struts 203A, 203B as structures of hinges may vary from orthopedic device to orthopedic device.
Referring to
The shell 222 is preferably carried by the strap 224, and may be adjustable at positions between the first and second brackets along the length of the strap therebetween. The strap 224 has first and second ends 230, 232 which are securable to one another to pull the first and second brackets 226, 228 toward one another and tighten over the upper knee of a user, to apply pressure on the leg, beyond articulation of the hinges 206, 208. The strap ends may secure to one another by a hook and loop system, whereby various portions of the strap have section of hook material and hook-receivable material, or other suitable means for securing the strap ends to one another or other portions of the strap (i.e., middle portion between the first and second ends). The strap enables coarse adjustment of a distance between the first and second brackets. It follows that as the hinges and hence the upper and lower frame components, articulate, the tensioning elements 212A, 212B pull the shell 222 toward the upper knee or leg of the user to apply pressure beyond pressure from tightening of the strap between the brackets 226, 228.
The concept of the tensioning device, and shell and strap system of this embodiment may be adapted to a variety of configurations, for exerting a load on the leg or knee of a user according to articulation of the hinge. The orthopedic device may be arranged with an adjustment device, as in other embodiments described herein.
Orthopedic devices may be provided with a strap system having opposing brackets upon which a strap adjustably secures and carries a shell. The brackets are held by tensioning elements connected to one of the upper and lower frame components, and coupled to the hinge so the tensioning elements urge the shell and strap system in a direction relative to the upper and lower frame components upon articulation of the hinges.
The frame for the aforementioned embodiments is a custom brace, commonly created from a model derived from a cast, and from measurements or scan of the user's leg. It is possible to alter the dimensions of the model to deviate from the actual users dimensions. The frame can have corrective varus/valgus contouring for the user for treating osteoarthritis. The frame may be contoured with up to 7°, preferably +/−3°, of varus or valgus correction, to treat osteoarthritis and ligament instability.
If the sagittal plane tibiofemoral angle of the model is altered, placing the model in genu valgum or “knock knee,” it is possible to for the final brace to be arranged to generate a medially directed force on the knee joint. In this example, the shape of the brace frame during articulation of the hinges would offload a load on the medial compartment while also creating a load in the lateral compartment. A correction offered may be limited to +/−3° from the users existing anatomical alignment. It is possible to also provide offloading of the lateral compartment/loading of the medial compartment by building the brace in relative genu varum (or bow-leggedness) as compared to the user.
After a PCL injury, the deficient or even post reconstruction ligament allows the tibia to sag posteriorly relative to the femur. The adjustment system, as in preceding embodiments of the dynamic brace, generates controlled and increasing posterior calf loads relative to the flexion angle. This load attempts to manipulate in a controlled way, the sagittal plane tibiofemoral alignment with the intension of reducing tension on the PCL ligament. As it heals, the ligament is prevented from stretching/elongation.
Post PCL injury, patients often report increased patellofemoral pain. This is presumably due to altered alignment/abhorrent joint surface contact due to the sag. Through application of aforementioned embodiments, it is believed that the alteration in tibiofemoral alignment can also reduce abhorrent joint surface pressures through improved anatomically correct congruence of the two bony surface. It has been show through in a study (currently unpublished; entitled “The Effect of Dynamic Bracing on Patellofemoral Compartment Pressures in PCL- and PCL/PLC-Deficient Knees”) there is a reduction of peak joint pressures by 30%.
In the study to determine the effect of dynamic bracing on patellofemeroal compartment pressures in a PCL and PCL/PLC (posterolateral corner) deficient knee, the aforementioned embodiments of
From the study, applying the dynamic brace, it was found that application of the dynamic brace led to significant reduction in peak patellofemoral compartment pressures in PCL deficient knees at 120° of flexion, and approached significance at 30°. It was also found that the dynamic brace led to a significant reduction in peak pressures of PCL/PLC deficient knees at 60°, 90° and 120° of flexion.
It is to be understood that not necessarily all objects or advantages may be achieved under any embodiment of the disclosure. For example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the orthopedic device may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught without achieving other objects or advantages as taught or suggested.
The skilled artisan will recognize the interchangeability of various disclosed features. Besides the variations described, other known equivalents for each feature can be mixed and matched by one of ordinary skill in this art to construct an orthopedic device under principles of the present disclosure. It will be understood by the skilled artisan that the features described may be adapted to other types of orthopedic devices. Hence this disclosure and the embodiments and variations thereof are not limited to knee braces, but can be utilized in any orthopedic devices.
Although this disclosure describes certain exemplary embodiments and examples of an orthopedic device, it therefore will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present disclosure extends beyond the specifically disclosed knee brace embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the disclosure and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. It is intended that the present disclosure should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, and may be extended to orthopedic devices and supports, and other applications that may employ the features described.
The application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/839,133, filed on Aug. 28, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/664,824, filed on Oct. 31, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,125,730, issued on Sep. 8, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/553,341, filed on Oct. 31, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D73768 | Allen | Jan 1868 | S |
1601659 | Van Harlingen | Sep 1926 | A |
2195024 | Bullock | Mar 1940 | A |
2467907 | Peckham | Apr 1949 | A |
2536454 | McIntyre | Jan 1951 | A |
2558986 | Seelert | Jul 1951 | A |
2959168 | Shook | Nov 1960 | A |
3444560 | Northup, Jr. | May 1969 | A |
3753625 | Fabrizio et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3976057 | Barclay | Aug 1976 | A |
4064569 | Campbell | Dec 1977 | A |
4088130 | Applegate | May 1978 | A |
4100918 | Glancy | Jul 1978 | A |
4145766 | May | Mar 1979 | A |
4220148 | Lehneis | Sep 1980 | A |
4298992 | Burstein et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4320747 | Daniell, Jr. | Mar 1982 | A |
4340041 | Frank | Jul 1982 | A |
4361142 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370977 | Mauldin et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4372298 | Lerman | Feb 1983 | A |
4397308 | Hepburn | Aug 1983 | A |
4407276 | Bledsoe | Oct 1983 | A |
4428369 | Peckham et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4433679 | Mauldin et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4463751 | Bledsoe | Aug 1984 | A |
4489718 | Martin | Dec 1984 | A |
4506661 | Foster | Mar 1985 | A |
4508111 | Hepburn | Apr 1985 | A |
4520802 | Mercer et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4523585 | Lamb et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4649906 | Spademan | Mar 1987 | A |
4655201 | Pirmantgen | Apr 1987 | A |
4657000 | Hepburn | Apr 1987 | A |
4691694 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697583 | Mason et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4723539 | Townsend | Feb 1988 | A |
4732143 | Kausek et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733656 | Marquette | Mar 1988 | A |
4768762 | Lund | Sep 1988 | A |
4773404 | Townsend | Sep 1988 | A |
4790299 | Marquette | Dec 1988 | A |
4793333 | Marquette | Dec 1988 | A |
4817588 | Bledsoe | Apr 1989 | A |
4856500 | Spademan | Aug 1989 | A |
4856501 | Castillo et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865024 | Hensley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890607 | Townsend | Jan 1990 | A |
4911709 | Marlow et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4955369 | Bledsoe et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961416 | Moore et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4966133 | Kausek | Oct 1990 | A |
4982732 | Morris | Jan 1991 | A |
4991571 | Kausek | Feb 1991 | A |
5002045 | Spademan | Mar 1991 | A |
5018514 | Grood et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020797 | Burns | Jun 1991 | A |
5038765 | Young et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5052375 | Stark et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063917 | Young et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5176622 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5213094 | Bonutti | May 1993 | A |
5230696 | Silver et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230697 | Castillo et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5261871 | Greenfield | Nov 1993 | A |
5347894 | Fischer | Sep 1994 | A |
5357654 | Hsing-Chi | Oct 1994 | A |
5437611 | Stern | Aug 1995 | A |
5443444 | Pruyssers | Aug 1995 | A |
5456268 | Bonutti | Oct 1995 | A |
5472410 | Hamersly | Dec 1995 | A |
5472412 | Knoth | Dec 1995 | A |
5514082 | Smith, III | May 1996 | A |
5575764 | Van Dyne | Nov 1996 | A |
5588956 | Billotti | Dec 1996 | A |
5599288 | Shirley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624390 | Van Dyne | Apr 1997 | A |
5628722 | Solomonow et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658241 | Deharde et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662596 | Young | Sep 1997 | A |
5683353 | Hamersly | Nov 1997 | A |
5685830 | Bonutti | Nov 1997 | A |
5807294 | Cawley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827208 | Mason et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857988 | Shirley | Jan 1999 | A |
5873847 | Bennett et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5891061 | Kaiser | Apr 1999 | A |
5891071 | Stearns et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5921946 | Tillinghast et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5950245 | Binduga | Sep 1999 | A |
5954677 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5997493 | Young | Dec 1999 | A |
6001075 | Clemens et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004283 | Young | Dec 1999 | A |
6074355 | Bartlett | Jun 2000 | A |
6110137 | Bastyr et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129690 | Hamlin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
RE37209 | Hensley et al. | Jun 2001 | E |
6245034 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
RE37297 | Smith, III | Jul 2001 | E |
6290664 | Nauert | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331169 | Bastyr et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6409693 | Brannigan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413232 | Townsend et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425166 | Seligman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436058 | Krahner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471664 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6500138 | Irby et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6551264 | Cawley et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6666837 | Weihermuller | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6740054 | Stearns | May 2004 | B2 |
6752775 | Seligman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6834752 | Irby et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875187 | Castillo | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6936020 | Davis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6993808 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004919 | Gaylord et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7037287 | Cormier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059329 | Mason et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074201 | Reinecke et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097627 | Enzerink et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117569 | Bledsoe | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150721 | Houser | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182740 | Castillo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7192407 | Seligman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198610 | Ingimundarson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201728 | Sterling | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207960 | Kenney | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235058 | Doty et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235059 | Mason et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7309322 | Albrecht et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311687 | Hoffmeier et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
D577828 | Ingimundarson et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
7431708 | Sreeramagiri | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435234 | Gamada | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7485103 | Mason et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500957 | Bledsoe | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534217 | Seligman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534219 | Stearns | May 2009 | B2 |
7544174 | Nathanson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553289 | Cadichon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597675 | Ingimundarson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7662122 | Sterling | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722555 | Doty et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727174 | Chang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749183 | Ingimundarson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7757303 | Miller | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7806842 | Stevenson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811242 | Seligman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7846115 | Seligman et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850632 | Gilmour | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7927299 | Krause | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963933 | Nace | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8048013 | Ingimundarson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8128587 | Stevenson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8376974 | Nace | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8882688 | Ancinec | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8920350 | Merkley et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020013544 | Stearns | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020052568 | Houser et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020133108 | Jagodzinski | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040002674 | Sterling | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049140 | Doty et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054307 | Mason et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054311 | Sterling | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068215 | Adelson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097859 | Stearns | May 2004 | A1 |
20050015156 | Hikichi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020951 | Gaylord et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050177082 | Bledsoe | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050245853 | Scorvo | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273025 | Houser | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060100560 | Gilmour | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100561 | Gilmour | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116616 | Albrecht et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135902 | Ingimundarson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142680 | Iarocci | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070010772 | Ryan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070100265 | Gamada | May 2007 | A1 |
20070232972 | Martinez | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270976 | DeHarde et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080051684 | Gamada | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066272 | Hammerslag et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080195013 | Ingimundarson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200856 | Cadichon | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249448 | Stevenson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294079 | Sterling et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090054819 | Einarsson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076426 | Einarsson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099495 | Campos et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099562 | Ingimundarson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105622 | Sterling et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124948 | Ingimundarson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171469 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240181 | Sreeramagiri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259154 | Nace | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287128 | Ingimundarson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100010409 | Bejarano | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056970 | Nace | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100162539 | Rancon | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110098618 | Fleming | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120046585 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059296 | Kompa | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120157902 | Castillo et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130110020 | Ingimundarson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150761 | Romo et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172797 | Merkley | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178771 | Moir et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130331754 | Dunn et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140213948 | Romo et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150005685 | Chetlapalli et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 20 274 | Dec 1984 | DE |
196 31 632 | Feb 1998 | DE |
196 45 076 | May 1998 | DE |
198 11 925 | Oct 1999 | DE |
10 259 751 | Jul 2004 | DE |
10 2010 006 089 | Aug 2010 | DE |
0 841 044 | May 1998 | EP |
0 941 722 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 114 619 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 302 184 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 575 464 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 880 802 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2 612 624 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2 122 846 | Sep 1972 | FR |
2 486 852 | Jan 1982 | FR |
2 663 380 | Dec 1991 | FR |
2 723 842 | Mar 1996 | FR |
2 777 489 | Oct 1999 | FR |
2 828 093 | Feb 2003 | FR |
1 213 855 | Nov 1970 | GB |
2009126724 | Oct 2009 | NO |
8604228 | Jul 1986 | WO |
9527451 | Oct 1995 | WO |
9616615 | Jun 1996 | WO |
2004056293 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006044423 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2010087899 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Defrate, Louis E., et al., “In Vivo Function of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament During Weightbearing Knee Flexion”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Dec. 2004, pp. 1923-1928, vol. 32, No. 8, Publisher: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Published by SAGE; http://ajs.sagepub.com/content/32/8/1923. |
Cascade, “Jack PCL Brace”, Oct. 2004, Publisher: Cascade Orthopedic Supply, Inc., Published in: US. http://www.cascade-usa.com/customer/caorsu/images/PDF/SSN—jackPCL.pdf downloaded, 1 page. |
Markolf, Keith L., et al., “Changes in Knee Laxity and Ligament Force After Sectioning the Posteromedial Bundle of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Oct. 2006, pp. 1100-1106, vol. 22, No. 10, Publisher: Arthroscopy Association of North America, Published in: US. |
Papannagari, Ramprasand, et al., “Function of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles During In Vivo Knee Flexion”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Sep. 2007, pp. 1507-1512, vol. 35, No. 9, Publisher: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Published by SAGE; http://ajs.sage.pub.com/content/35/9/1507. |
Bledsoe Axiom/Axiom-D Custom & OTS Knee Brace, “Application Instructions & Patient Manual: Instructions for ACL or PCL Symptoms”, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-4, vol. CP020223, Rev B, Publisher: Bledsoe Brace Systems, Published in: US. http://www.bledsoebrace.com/pdf/AI/Axiom-AI.pdf. |
Brochure: Armor Fourcepoint, Donjoy Product pages http://www.donjoy.com/armorfp. Downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Published: US. |
Brochure: “Fusion OA”, Breg 360 Customer Care, Product page http://www.breg.com/knee-bracing/oa/fusion-oa.html, downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Publisher: Orthofix, Published in: US. |
Brochure: “Fusion XT OA”, Bregg 360 Customer Care, Product page http://www.breg.com/knee-bracing/oa/fusion-xt-oa.html, downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Publisher: Orthofix, Published in: US. |
Brochure: “CTI Custom”, Ossur Product page from http://www.ossur.com/?PageID=13230 downloaded, Oct. 2011, 2 pages. Publisher: Ossur Americas, Published in: US. |
Brochure: “X2K-OA”, Bregg 360 Customer Care, Product page http://www.breg.com/knee-bracing/oa/x2k-oa.html. Downloaded, Oct. 2011, 1 page. Publisher: Orthofix, Published in: US. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding Application No. PCT/US2011/051627, Jan. 6, 2012. |
International Search Report from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/062702, Feb. 15, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability regarding Application No. PCT/US2011/051627, Mar. 28, 2013. |
Menetrey, Jacques, “PCL: Conservative Treatment”, 4th Advanced Course on Knee Surgery, Jan. 22-27, 2012. http://www.kneecourse.com/download/seminar—2012/monday/MENETREY%20Conservative%20treatment.pdf, 37 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 12150517.6, May 22, 2012. |
Smith, Sean D. et al., “Functional bracing of ACL injuries: current state and future directions”, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthhroscopy, Springer, Apr. 27, 2013, 11 pages. |
Knapik, Joseph J. et al., Isometric, Isotonic and Isokinetic Torque Variations in Four Muscle Groups Through a Range of Joint Motion, “Physical Therapy: Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association and de Fysiotherapeut”, 1983, vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 938-947, downloaded from http://ptjournal.apta.org/ on Apr. 15, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2014/013245, May 6, 2014. |
Jansson, Kyle S. et al., “A Historical Perspective of PCL Bracing”, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthhroscopy, Springer-Verlag, May 24, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2014/042989, Oct. 15, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160151188 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61553341 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13664824 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14839133 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14839133 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15016631 | US |