This application claims the benefit under Title 35, U.S.C. §120 of U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/362,747, filed on May 28, 2010 and entitled PROSTHESIS IMPACTION AND EXTRACTION TOOL.
1. Field of the Disclosure
The present subject matter relates to systems and methods for delivering a device to a selected location within the body. More particularly, the present subject matter relates to an inserter for deploying an orthopedic component or implant within the body and methods of using the same.
2. Background
Various devices are known for inserting, positioning, and/or impacting orthopedic implants or “provisionals” (i.e., temporary implant simulators for ascertaining the proper size and shape for a permanent implant) in orthopedic procedures. These devices will be collectively and interchangeably referred to herein as “orthopedic implant inserters” or “implant inserters” or “inserters,” for short, and though illustrated in the context of insertion of a femoral component in an orthopedic knee procedure, such inserters may be used with other body implants (e.g., implants in the tibial baseplate region) and the present disclosure is not limited to inserters used only with femoral implants. Also, as used herein, “implants” includes actual implants, implant components, and provisionals.
Implant inserters have been commercially available in a variety of shapes and configurations. Typically, such implant inserters have been relatively large, with associated weight and ergonomic shortcomings. Further, orthopedic procedures often involve physically impacting or hammering the inserter with a mallet to install the implant. Over time, this usage can damage the inserter itself and result in undesirable wear and tear to that portion of the inserter to which the implant is temporarily mounted during implantation. To prevent damaging the implant, the entire inserter is periodically replaced with a costly new one.
Thus, there continues to be a need for implant inserters that advance the state of the art of implant inserter design and that may address one or more shortcomings of prior devices including, but not limited to, those mentioned above.
In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, an orthopedic implant inserter comprises first and second facing handles joined for relative movement toward and away from one another. A first implant-engaging member is mounted on the first handle and a second implant-engaging member is mounted on the second handle. At least one of the implant-engaging members is removably mounted on the associated handle.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, an orthopedic implant inserter comprises first and second facing handles joined for relative movement toward and away from one another. A first implant-engaging jaw is removably mounted to the first handle and a second implant-engaging jaw is removably mounted to the second handle. Each implant-engaging jaw is pivotal with respect to the associated handle and removably secured thereto by a retainer. Each retainer is movable between a retaining configuration in which the implant-engaging jaw is secured to the associated handle and a release configuration in which the implant-engaging jaw is removable from the associated handle. Each retainer engages and biases the associated implant-engaging jaw to a selected pivotal position when in the retaining configuration.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present disclosure, an orthopedic implant inserter jaw is provided for removable mounting on the handle of an orthopedic implant inserter configured to receive a retainer that includes a shaft and a latch cooperatively associated with the shaft and which retainer is movable between a retaining configuration in which the retainer is secured to the handle and a release configuration in which the retainer is removable from the handle. The jaw comprises a base, a through bore in the base for removably receiving a shaft of a retainer, and an implant support and impact surface on the base. The jaw further includes an implant-engaging surface carried on the base for engaging an implant in a desired position with respect to the base and an orientation structure on the base that cooperates with a retainer latch for orienting the jaw in one position on the handle.
As made clearer below, there are several aspects of the present subject matter which may be embodied separately or together in the methods and systems described and claimed below. These aspects may be employed alone or in combination with other aspects of the subject matter described herein, and the description of these aspects together is not intended to preclude the use of these aspects separately or the claiming of such aspects separately or in different combinations as set forth in the claims appended hereto.
The embodiments disclosed herein are for the purpose of providing a description of the present subject matter, and it is understood that the subject matter may be embodied in various other forms and combinations not shown in detail. Therefore, specific designs and features disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting the subject matter as defined in the accompanying claims.
By way of background, a prior art inserter “A” is illustrated in
In use, the implant is secured in place between the jaws C, in contact with the surfaces D and the pads E. The inserter A is then oriented and advanced to position the implant at a selected location within the body (e.g., at or adjacent to a prepared portion of a femur). With the implant in place, the proximal end “F” of the inserter A is impacted (e.g., using a mallet) to fully seat the implant into the target site. The impact pads E are the primary means by which force is applied from the inserter A to the implant. The impact pads E contact the implant over a large surface area, so it will be appreciated that they spread the force and reduce the impact stress experienced by the implant. The surfaces D (which are primarily intended to secure the implant in place or orient it during delivery to the selected location) substantially do not function to transmit impact forces to the implant. By distributing the impact stress over a greater area of surfaces, the risk of damaging the surfaces D and/or the implant itself is reduced.
One disadvantage of the foregoing design is that the jaws C, while pivotal, are fixedly secured to the handles B. Thus, if the impact pad E or another portion of the jaw C becomes damaged or worn after repeated use, the entire inserter A becomes unusable.
Turning now to the present invention and to a device that illustrates various aspects thereof,
The illustrated arms 22 are integrally formed with the associated grip portion 20, which may be advantageous to provide relatively strong and durable handles 12 and 14. The exact shape of the arms 22 depends on the nature of the implant to be handled by the inserter 10, with
The handles 12 and 14 may be made of any suitably rigid and durable material such as metal or a rigid polymer. Most preferably, the handles 12 and 14 are made of a medical-grade metal, such as surgical stainless steel. Other materials and material constructions, such as composites and laminates, may also be used without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
The inserter 10 may further include an adjuster 30 for selectively adjusting the separation between the handles 12 and 14. The adjuster is one way to allow the handles 12 and 14 to be moved away from each other to accommodate an implant therebetween and then moved toward each other to engage the implant. The illustrated embodiment of the adjuster 30 connects the handles 12 and 14 to each other and provides for translation of the handles toward and away from one another. In the illustrated embodiment, a cylindrical shaft 32 of the adjuster 30 passes through a hole or opening 34, 36 in each of the handles 12 and 14. In the embodiment of
It will be appreciated that, by reason of the pivotal attachment of the arms by the pivot pin 18 at the bottom end 16 of the handles 12 and 14, operating the adjuster 30 will cause the upper ends 26 of the handles 12 and 14 to pivot toward and away from each other. As noted previously, the configuration of
To cooperate with an orthopedic implant, the inserter 10 further includes a first implant-engaging member or jaw 46 connected to the arm 22 of the first handle 12 and second implant-engaging member or jaw 48 connected to the arm 22 of the second handle 14. The upper end portion 26 of the second handle 14 and the second jaw 48 are illustrated in greater detail in
Each jaw 48 (shown in greater detail in
The illustrated base 50 has a support portion 52 which defines a cavity 54 (
The jaw 48 also includes a projection 70 which extends generally upwardly from a hinge portion 58 thereof. The projection 70 includes an inwardly facing post or flange or other implant-engaging surface 72, which is configured to engage the implant, such as by receipt within a slot or opening of the implant, as in
At least one of the jaws 46, 48, but more advantageously both of the jaws 46 and 48, are removably mounted on the associated handle 12, 14, which allows the jaw to be removed and replaced if it has become damaged or worn or if it becomes desirable to install a differently shaped jaw. In an exemplary embodiment, this is accomplished by the use of retainers 62 (
To accommodate the retainers 62 (which will be described in greater detail herein), the hinge portion 58 of the jaw base 50 includes a through bore 60 (
The retainer 62 is illustrated in
The latch 76 is cooperatively associated with the shaft 74 so as to be movable between a retaining configuration in which the shaft 74 is retained in the aligned mounting bores 28 and 60 (
The jaws 46 and 48 of the inserter 10 are attached to the respective handles 12 and 14 as follows. First, the hinge portion 58 of the base 50 is positioned in the forked upper end 26 of the associated handle 12,14, with the jaw bore 60 substantially aligned with the arm bores 28 to define a bearing for the shaft 74, with the support portion 52 pointed toward the opposing handle 14, 12, and the pad 56 oriented upwardly (i.e., away from the inserter 10). With the respective jaw 46, 48 properly positioned, the shaft 74 of a retainer 62 is inserted through the aligned mounting bores 28 and 60, being mindful of the orientation of the orientation surfaces 64 and 68. When the shaft 74 is fully or at least adequately inserted through the bores 28 and 60, the latch 76 may be pivoted or otherwise moved to lock the retainer 62 in place. So attaching the latch 76 secures the jaw 46, 48 to the associated handle 12, 14, while also allowing the jaw 46, 48 to pivot with respect to the handle 12, 14, as described above.
To remove the jaw 46, 48 from the handle 12, 14, the latch 76 is pivoted or moved in the opposite direction to unlock the retainer 62. The shaft 74 can then be slid out of the bores 28 and 60, which disengages the jaw 46, 48 from the handle 12, 14.
The illustrated latch 76 is a generally C- or U-shaped component with generally parallel first and second legs 80 and 82 which are connected by a crossbeam or midsection 84. The first leg 80 is pivotally connected to one end 78 of the shaft 74 by a pin 86 (
As for the midsection 84 of the latch 76, it may be advantageous for it to have a width generally the same as the width of the forked upper end 26 of the associated handle 14. If so configured, when the retainer 62 is latched in place, the legs 80 and 82 will fit snugly around the forked upper end 26, thereby preventing significant lateral movement or “wiggling” of the retainer 62 on the handle 14.
The latch 76 may optionally include one or more features which enhance the functionality of the retainer 62. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the latch 76 includes a biasing feature, and more specifically the midsection 84 of the latch 76 includes a biasing member or surface 92. The biasing surface 92 of the midsection 84 is configured to contact the outer surface 66 of the jaw 48 (
The retainer 62, and the latch 76 in particular, may also include an orientation feature to reduce the chance of mis-assembly or mis-orientation of the jaw 48 on its respective handle 14. As illustrated, the latch 76 includes orientation structures 68 which are configured to cooperate with orientation structures 64 of the associated jaw 48, such that the orientation structures 64 and 68 accommodate each other in only one orientation, thereby dictating the orientation of the retainer 62 when the latch 76 is moved to the retaining configuration.
More specifically, in the illustrated embodiment, the hinge portion 58 of the jaw base 50 includes two orientation structures 64 which are provided as raised surfaces or projections positioned at the outer or outside-facing surface 66 of the jaw 48 (
The illustrated orientation structures 64 are provided as a pair of vertically oriented, generally oval-, rectangle-, or “racetrack”-shaped projections. The projections 64 are shown as being identical to each other, but other embodiments may include orientation structures which are differently shaped from each other. The projections 64 may be relatively small and/or thin, as they merely provide an orienting function, rather than serving as force-bearing structures.
As for the orientation surfaces 68 of the latch 76, they are illustrated as generally U-shaped slots or receiving regions which at least partially receive the projections 64 of the jaw 48 when the retainer 62 is latched onto the jaw 48 and handle 14 (
It will be understood that the embodiments described above are illustrative of some of the applications of the principles of the present subject matter. Numerous modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter, including those combinations of features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein. For these reasons, the scope hereof is not limited to the above description but is as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4083642 | Journee | Apr 1978 | A |
4601289 | Chiarizzio et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
5059196 | Coates | Oct 1991 | A |
5324293 | Rehmann | Jun 1994 | A |
5417693 | Sowden et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423826 | Coates | Jun 1995 | A |
5486181 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5540697 | Rehmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5683464 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5732992 | Mauldin | Mar 1998 | A |
6261296 | Aebi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6540785 | Gill et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551316 | Rinner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579296 | Macey | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6626913 | McKinnon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6719794 | Gerber et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743258 | Keller | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6918324 | Hsien | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974480 | Messerli et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7037311 | Parkinson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048742 | Keller | May 2006 | B2 |
7060073 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7150761 | Justin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156004 | Whitehead et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7338497 | Coon et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7776044 | Pendleton et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20030109929 | Keller | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040215200 | Tornier et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050139422 | Riley | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050288788 | Dougherty-Shah | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060142777 | Bastian | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090036909 | Perry et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120109225 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29362747 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 12916127 | US |