Patent Grant
10752768
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention pertains to semi- and fully interpenetrating polymer networks, methods of making semi- and fully interpenetrating polymer networks, articles useful in orthopedics made from such semi- and fully interpenetrating polymer networks, and methods of using such articles.
Fully interpenetrating polymer networks (IPN's) and semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (“semi-IPN's”) have been created from a variety of starting materials and have been used for a variety of applications. IPN's and semi-IPNs can combine the beneficial properties of the polymers from which they are made and can avoid some of the undesirable properties of their component polymers.
Prior IPN's and semi-IPNs have been proposed for use in biomedical applications, such as a coating for an implant or as artificial cartilage. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2005/0147685; U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2009/0035344; and U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2009/008846. The utility of prior IPNs and semi-IPNs for their proposed applications is limited by the properties of those compositions, however. In addition, the starting materials and processes of making such prior compositions limit not only the resulting properties of the IPN or semi-IPN but also the commercial viability of the manufacturing processes and the articles made in such processes. Also, the mechanical properties of prior IPNs and semi-IPNs are often limited by the mechanical properties of the component polymers used, which in the case of most intrinsically hydrophilic, water-swellable polymers, are usually quite low. For example, the prior art has not described making a water-swellable IPN or semi-IPN from commercially available hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymers, such as polyurethane or ABS.
Finally, the utility of prior IPN and semi-IPN compositions and the value of the articles formed from such compositions have been limited by the inability to create IPN's and semi-IPNs with desired characteristics, such as strength, lubricity and wear-resistance.
The prior art has also not provided joint implants that fully address the loss of motion and pain experienced by individuals suffering from arthritis or other joint damage. When less invasive methods fail, patients suffering from joint problems can undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA) or joint resurfacing. The joint is opened, damaged or diseased bone is removed and an implant is laced in the joint. Implants made from metal, ceramic and/or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) have been used in orthopedic joint arthroplasty or joint replacement for a number of years. Surgeons have experience replacing one or both sides of a joint. They can replace both sides with the same material; if the material is metal then a metal-on-metal articulation is created. They can replace each side of the joint with a different material to create a mixed articulation, such as metal-on-polyethylene.
Although a large number of patients undergo joint replacement surgery each year (an estimated 540,000 patients in the U.S. undergo knee arthroplasty annually), metal, ceramic, and UHMWPE implants in joints can cause adverse local and remote tissue responses. The responses may be due to inherent characteristics of the implant, changes in the implant material over time, or release of material from the implant. A prosthetic joint implant experiences significant friction, motion, pressure, and chemical changes over the course of many years. As time goes by, the implant may corrode or may release ions or debris, such as metal ions or wear particles. The ions or particles may remain in the joint area or may travel through the blood to other parts of the body. The implant or the debris or ions it releases may cause bone resorption (osteolysis), inflammation, metal toxicity, pseudo-tumors, pain, and other problems. In some cases, the implant may loosen and require replacement, using a procedure called revision surgery. In revision surgery, the old, unwanted implant is removed, additional damaged or diseased joint and/or bone material is removed to create a clean, strong surface for attaching the implant, and a new implant is placed. Revision surgeries are expensive, painful, sometimes result in dangerous and hard-to-treat infections, and require long recovery and rehabilitation time.
More recently, hydrogel polymers have been suggested for use in joint implants as alternatives to the metal, ceramic, and UHMWPE implants. U.S. 2004/0199250 by Fell describes a knee prosthesis with a hydrogel coating portion and a high modulus supporting portion for placement into a body joint without requiring bone resection. U.S. 2006/0224244 to Thomas et al. describes a hydrogel implant for replacing a portion of a skeletal joint. The implant has a hydrogel bearing surface with high water content and lower strength and rigidity mounted to a support substrate. U.S. 2008/0241214 to Myung et al. describes the attachment of a hydro gel polymer to a metal assembly. The surface of the metal assembly is modified using an inorganic material and the hydrogel polymer is attached using an intervening polymer network. The assembly may be used as an orthopedic implant. These hydrogel polymers, however, do not perfectly recreate the original anatomy, shape, or strength of the joint.
What are needed are materials and methods which overcome the above and other disadvantages of known joint replacement or joint resurfacing implants and procedures.
The mechanical properties desired for certain medical applications are often outside the range of possibility of many hydrophilic starting materials. Hence, one aspect of this invention takes advantage of the high mechanical strength of hydrophobic starting materials and combines those materials with certain ionic polymers as a useful way to achieve the goal of high mechanical strength in addition to other desirable properties. Thus, while the prior art took water-swellable polymers and tried to make them stronger, one aspect of this invention takes strong materials and makes them more water-swellable.
For purposes of this application, an “interpenetrating polymer network” or “IPN” is a material comprising two or more polymer networks which are at least partially interlaced on a molecular scale, but not covalently bonded to each other, and cannot be separated unless chemical bonds are broken. A “semi-interpenetrating polymer network” or “semi-IPN” is a material comprising one or more polymer networks and one or more linear or branched polymers characterized by the penetration on a molecular scale of at least one of the networks by at least some of the linear or branched macromolecules. As distinguished from an IPN, a semi-IPN is a polymer blend in which at least one of the component polymer networks is not chemically crosslinked by covalent bonds.
A “polymer” is a substance comprising macromolecules, including homopolymers (a polymer derived one species of monomer) and copolymers (a polymer derived from more than one species of monomer). A “hydrophobic polymer” is a pre-formed polymer network having at least one of the following two properties: (1) a surface water contact angle of at least 45° and (2) exhibits water absorption of 2.5% or less after 24 hours at room temperature according to ASTM test standard D570. A “hydrophilic polymer” is a polymer network having a surface water contact angle less than 45° and exhibits water absorption of more than 2.5% after 24 hours at room temperature according to ASTM test standard D570. An “ionic polymer” is defined as a polymer comprised of macromolecules containing at least 2% by weight ionic or ionizable monomers (or both), irrespective of their nature and location. An “ionizable monomer” is a small molecule that can be chemically bonded to other monomers to form a polymer and which also has the ability to become negatively charged due the presence of acid functional groups such carboxylic acid and/or sulfonic acid. A “thermoset polymer” is one that does not melt when heated, unlike a thermoplastic polymer. Thermoset polymers “set” into a given shape when first made and afterwards do not flow or melt, but rather decompose upon heating and are often highly crosslinked and/or covalently crosslinked. A “thermoplastic polymer” is one which melts or flows when heated, unlike thermoset polymers. Thermoplastic polymers are usually not covalently crosslinked. A “polymer alloy” is an IPN or semi-IPN. A “gradient polymer alloy” is a gradient IPN or semi-IPN (e.g. an IPN or semi-IPN having a compositional gradient). “Phase separation” is defined as the conversion of a single phase system into a multi-phase system; especially the separation of two immiscible blocks of a block copolymer into two phases, with the possibility of a small interphase in which a small degree of mixing occurs. The present invention includes a process for modifying common commercially available hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymers, such as polyurethane or ABS to provide new properties, such as strength, lubricity, electrical conductivity and wear-resistance. Other possible hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymers are described below. The invention also includes the IPN and semi-IPN compositions as well as articles made from such compositions and methods of using such articles. The IPN and semi-IPN compositions of this invention may attain one or more of the following characteristics: High tensile and compressive strength; low coefficient of friction; high water content and swellability; high permeability; biocompatibility; and biostability.
One aspect of the invention provides an orthopedic implant, e.g. adapted to fit an acromioclavicular joint, an ankle joint, a condyle, an elbow joint, a finger joint, a glenoid, a hip joint, an intervertebral disc, an intervertebral facet joint, a labrum, a meniscus, a metacarpal joint, a metatarsal joint, a patella, a tibial plateau, a toe joint, a temporomandibular joint, or a wrist joint, including a bone interface member having a bone contact surface and a water swellable IPN or semi-IPN member having a bearing surface and an attachment zone, the attachment zone being attached to the bone interface member, the water swellable IPN or semi-IPN member comprising a hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymer first network and an ionic polymer second network configured to exhibit a compositional gradient between the bearing surface and the attachment zone. In some embodiments, the implant the compositional gradient forms a stiffness gradient. In some embodiments, one of the networks forms a hydration gradient from a first portion of the implant to a second portion of the implant.
In some embodiments, the bone interface member includes metal (e.g. porous metal). In some embodiments, the bone interface member includes a ceramic or polymer. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the orthopedic joint is configured to change a shape or to transiently bend during implant placement in a joint.
In some embodiments, in which the first network includes a polyurethane, the implant includes a chemical linkage between the IPN or semi-IPN member and the bone interfacing member (e.g. a urethane linkage). In some embodiment, an attachment of the attachment zone to the bone interface member is created by an adhesive.
In some embodiments, the ionic polymer second network has a fixed charge, and may further include carboxylic acid and/or sulfonic acid groups.
In some embodiments a thickness of the IPN or semi-IPN is less than 5 mm in a thickest region.
In some embodiments, the implant may further include a synthetic joint capsule and may include fluid. In some embodiments, the implant may further include a labral component. In some embodiments, the implant may have a shape of a cap, a cup, a plug, a mushroom, a patch and/or a stem.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides an orthopedic implant system including a first medical implant including a water-swellable IPN or semi-IPN including a hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymer and an ionic polymer, the first medical implant have a bone contact surface configured to conform to a bone surface and a bearing surface adapted to mate with a bearing surface of another implant or a natural joint and a joint capsule configured to enclose the bearing surface. In some embodiments, the joint capsule includes a fluid.
In some embodiments, the system further includes a second medical implant including a water swellable IPN or semi-IPN including a hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymer and an ionic polymer, the second medical implant having a bone contact surface configured to conform to a bone surface and a bearing surface, and the first medical implant may be configured for placement in one side of a joint, the second medical implant is configured for placement on a second side of the joint and the bearing surfaces of the first and second medical implants are configured to mate, and the joint capsule may be configured to enclose the bearing surfaces of the first and the second medical implants.
In some embodiments, the orthopedic implant system further includes a bone interface member physically attached to the IPN or semi-IPN, and the bone interface member includes the bone contact surface and may be metal.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a hip joint implant including a water-swellable IPN or semi-IPN including a hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymer and an ionic polymer, the implant having a bone contact surface configured to conform to a bone surface and a bearing surface, and a labral component configured to enclose the bearing surface.
In some embodiments, the hip joint implant further includes a joint capsule including fluid and configured to enclose the bearing surface.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a composition of matter including a polyurethane-polyacrylic acid IPN or semi-IPN including about 4% to about 90% (w/w) polyurethane, about 1% to about 40% (w/w) electrolyte of polyacrylic acid, and about 3% to about 80% water when analyzed at pH 7.4, 37° C., in a 0.9% aqueous salt solution. In some embodiments, the concentration of polyurethane is from about 8% to about 55%, the composition of an electrolyte of polyacrylic acid is from about 9% to about 22%, and/or a concentration of water is from about 25% to about 80%.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides an orthopedic implant including a water swellable IPN or semi-IPN having a bearing surface and an attachment surface and including a hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymer first network and an ionic polymer second network, the bearing surface having a coefficient of friction between 0.001 and 0.1, an equilibrium compressive elastic modulus between 0.8 and 200 MPa, a water content between 25% and 80%, a hydraulic permeability greater than 1017 m4/N sec, and a failure tensile strain greater than 10%. In some embodiments, the orthopedic implant has a failure tensile strain greater than 50%.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides an orthopedic implant including a polymer bearing member including a bearing surface and an attachment zone (e.g. a feature such as a cone, a depression, a groove, a peg, a pillar, a pin, and a pyramid), and a bone interface member attached to the attachment zone of the polymer bearing member and including metal and open spaces in the metal, the orthopedic implant being deformable from a first shape to a second shape to conform a bone interface member to a bone surface.
In some embodiments, the open spaces in the orthopedic implant includes pores or slots in the metal. In some embodiments, the orthopedic implant includes a plurality of metal members attached to the attachment surface and separated from each other.
In some embodiments, the bone interface member is physically attached to the' polymer bearing member, such as by a chemical linkage between the polymer bearing member and the bone interfacing member. In some embodiments, an attachment of the attachment zone to the bone interface member is created by an adhesive.
In some embodiments, the polymer bearing member includes a water swellable IPN or semi-IPN, and may include a hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymer first network and an ionic polymer second network.
Yet another aspect of the invention includes a method of inserting an orthopedic implant into a joint, the implant including a metal portion and a flexible polymer portion having an attachment zone and a bearing surface, the metal portion attached to the attachment zone, the method includes the steps of inserting the implant in a first shape into the joint and changing the implant from the first shape to a second shape to conform to a shape of at least a portion of a bone forming the joint. In some embodiments, the method further includes the step of changing the implant from the second shape back to the first shape after the first changing step. In other embodiments, the method includes the step of deforming the implant from an original shape to the first shape prior to the changing step. In some embodiments in which the joint is a hip joint and the implant is configured for placement on a femoral head of a hip joint, deforming includes expanding a portion of the implant to fit over the femoral head.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The present invention includes a process for modifying hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymers to confer upon them qualities such as lubricity, permeability, conductivity and wear-resistance. Such hydrophobic polymers ordinarily do not soak up water to any significant extent and are generally useful for their mechanical strength, impermeability and insulating ability. An exemplary list of common and commercially available hydrophobic polymers modifiable by the process of this invention includes the following: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), Acrylic, Celluloid, Cellulose acetate, Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA), Ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVAL), Kydex, a trademarked acrylic/PVC alloy, Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP), Polyacetal (POM or Acetal), Polyacrylates (Acrylic), Polyacrylonitrile (PAN or Acrylonitrile), Polyamide (PA or Nylon), Polyamideimide (PAI), Polyaryletherketone (PAEK or Ketone), Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), Polyketone (PK), Polyester, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Polyetherimide (PEI), Polyethersulfone (PES)-see Polysulfone, Polyethylenechlorinates (PEC), Polyimide (PI), Polymethylpentene (PMP), Polyphenylene oxide (PPO), Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), Polyphthalamide (PPA), Polystyrene (PS), Polysulfone (PSU), Polyvinyl acetate (PVA), Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), Polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), Spectralon, Styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN), Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and Polyurethanes (PU). Other, less common and non-commercially available (i.e. custom) polymers may also be used. A wide variety of polyurethanes can be used with varying hard segment, soft segment, and chain extender compositions, as will be described herein.
One aspect of the invention takes advantage of a characteristic of some modifiable thermoset or thermoplastic hydrophobic polymers: the presence of ordered and disordered (amorphous) domains within the polymer. For example, some hydrophobic thermoset or thermoplastic polymers such as polyurethanes are phase-separated, containing first domains of hard segments and second domains of soft segments, with the two domains exhibiting different solubility properties with respect to interpenetration of monomers. In polyurethanes, the hard segments are disposed primarily within the ordered domains and the soft segments are disposed primarily within the disordered (amorphous) domains. (The starting polymer may contain more than two domains, of course, without departing from the scope of the invention.) This difference in properties between the two domains of the phase-separated polymer enables the process of this invention to impart new properties to the polymer that can extend throughout the bulk of the material or throughout only a portion of the material, e.g., in a particular region or in a gradient. For example, a non-lubricious polymer can be made lubricious; an otherwise non-conductive polymer can be made conductive; and an otherwise non-permeable polymer can be made permeable. Moreover, the process can be performed repeatedly to introduce more than one new property to the starting polymer.
In some embodiments, phase separation in the polymer allows for differential swelling of one or more separated phases within the polymer with, e.g., a solvent and/or monomer, which is then used to impart new properties. According to the invention, for example, lubriciousness can be introduced to an otherwise non-lubricious material by adding and polymerizing ionic monomers. In one embodiment, a polymer material with high mechanical strength and a lubricious surface can be made from an otherwise non-lubricious, hydrophobic polymer and a hydrophilic polymer derived from ionizable, vinyl monomers. By converting otherwise hydrophobic materials into biphasic materials with both solid and liquid (water) phases, the present invention addresses a need in the art for lubricious, high strength materials for use in medical, commercial, and industrial applications.
The new properties provided by this IPN depend on the properties of the polymerized monomers that were introduced and on any optional post-polymerization processing. Examples of such new properties include lubriciousness, conductivity, hardness, absorbency, permeability, photoreactivity and thermal reactivity. For example, as shown in
In addition to absorbency, various levels of permeability (water, ion, and/or solute transport) can be introduced into an otherwise non-permeable material. For example, a hydrophobic polymer material such as polyurethane or ABS can be infiltrated with an ionic polymer such as polyacrylic acid and/or poly(sulfopropyl methacrylate) so that it absorbs water, as described above. This hydration of the bulk of the material allows for the transport of solutes and ions. The transport of solutes and ions and permeability to water is made possible by phase continuity of the hydrated phase of the IPN. This is useful in various applications, including drug delivery, separation processes, proton exchange membranes, and catalytic processes. The permeability can also be utilized to capture, filter, or chelate solutes as a liquid flows over or through the material. Furthermore, because of this permeability, the materials of the present invention can be bestowed with increased resistance to creep and fatigue relative to their component hydrophobic polymers due to their ability to re-absorb fluid after sustained or repetitive loading.
Conductivity can be introduced into an otherwise non-conductive material. For example, an insulating polymer material such as polyurethane can be infiltrated with a conductive polymer (a polyelectrolyte) so that at least part of the hybrid material is conductive to electric current.
The invention also includes the alteration of chemical groups of the second polymer and the use of tethering points in the second polymer for another polymer, molecule or biomolecule. Also, any of the domains can be doped with any number of materials, such as antioxidants, ions, ionomers, contrast agents, particles, metals, pigments, dyes, biomolecules, polymers, proteins and/or therapeutic agents.
The first polymer can be additionally crosslinked or copolymerized with the second polymer if, for example, acryloxy, methacryloxy-, acrylamido-, allyl ether, or vinyl functional groups are incorporated into one end or both ends of the polyurethane prepolymer and then cured by UV or temperature in the presence of an initiator. For instance, a polyurethane dimethacrylate or polyurethane bisacrylamide can be used in the first network by curing in the presence of a solvent (such as dimethylacetamide) and then evaporating the solvent. The addition of chemical crosslinks (rather than just physical crosslinks) to the IPN adds a level of mechanical stability against creep or fatigue caused by continuous, dynamic loading.
In addition, a multi-arm (multifunctional) polyol or isocyanate can be used to create crosslinks in the polyurethane. In this case, a fully interpenetrating polymer network is created (rather than a semi-interpenetrating polymer network). The result is a composite material with the high strength and toughness of polyurethane and the lubricious surface and biphasic bulk behavior of the poly(acrylic acid). Alternatively, other crosslinking methods can be used, including but not limited to gamma or electron-beam irradiation. These features are especially important for bearing applications such as artificial joint surfaces, or as more biocompatible, thrombo-resistant, long-term implants in other areas of the body such as the vascular system or the skin. Being swollen with water also allows imbibement with solutes such as therapeutic agents or drugs for localized delivery to target areas of the body.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the first polymer can be linked to the second polymer. For example, polyurethane can be linked through a vinyl-end group. Depending on the reactivity ratio between the end group and the monomer being polymerized, different chain configurations can be yielded. For instance, if the reactivity of the monomer with itself is much greater than the end group with the monomer, then the second polymer will be almost completely formed before the addition of the first polymer to the chain. On the other hand, if the reactivity of the monomer and the end group are similar, then a random grafting-type copolymerization will occur. The monomers and end groups can be chosen based on their reactivity ratios by using a table of relative reactivity ratios published in, for example, The Polymer Handbook. The result of these will be a hybrid copolymer/interpenetrating polymer network.
Any number or combinations of ethylenically unsaturated monomers or macromonomers (i.e., with reactive double bonds/vinyl groups) can be used alone or in combination with various solvents and selectively introduced into one or more of the phases of the polymer as long as at least 2% of such monomers is ionizable, i.e., contains carboxylic acid and/or sulfonic acid functional groups. Other monomers include but are not limited to dimethylacrylamide, acrylamide, NIPAAm, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl acrylate/methacrylate, and any vinyl-based monomer containing sulfonic acid groups (e.g. acrylamido methyl propane sulfonic acid, vinyl sulfonic acid, 3-sulfopropyl acrylate (or methacrylate), 2-methyl-2-propene-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt 98%, or any monomers in which sulfonic acid is conjugated (allyl ethers, acrylate/methacrylates, vinyl groups, or acrylamides). The monomer can also include any monomers containing carboxylic acid groups conjugated to allyl ethers, acrylate/methacrylates, vinyl groups, or acrylamides. In addition, the monomers can be used in combination, such as both carboxyl acid and sulfonic acid containing monomers, to create a carboxylate/sulfonate copolymer. The pendant functional groups on polymers resulting from these monomers and monomer combinations can be subject to subsequent chemical reactions to yield other functionalities to the final polymer.
In one embodiment, a preformed, thermoplastic polymer may be immersed in acrylic acid (or in a solution of acrylic acid (1%-100%) or other vinyl monomer solution) along with about 0.1% v/v crosslinker (e.g., triethylene glycol dimethacrylate or N,N methylene bisacrylamide) with respect to the monomer and about 0.1% v/v photoinitiator (e.g. 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone) with respect to the monomer. The acrylic acid solution can be based on water, salt buffer, or organic solvents such as dimethylacetamide, acetone, ethanol, methanol, isopropyl alcohol, toluene, dichloromethane, propanol, dimethylsulfoxide, dimethyl formamide, or tetrahydrofuran. The polymer may be swollen by the monomer due to salvation of the soft segments in the polymer. The monomer content in the swollen polymer can range from as little as about 1% to up to about 90%.
The monomer-swollen polymer may then be removed, placed in a mold made of glass, quartz, or a transparent polymer, then exposed to UV light (or elevated temperature) to initiate polymerization and crosslinking of the monomers. Alternatively, instead of using a mold, the monomer-swollen polymer can be polymerized while fully or partially exposed to air or an inert atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen or argon), or alternatively in the presence of another liquid such as an oil (e.g., paraffin, mineral, or silicone oil). For medical applications, it is possible that polymerization step can be performed in vivo without a mold.
Depending on the initiator used, exposure to UV light, IR, or visible light, a chemical, electrical charge, or elevated temperature leads to polymerization and crosslinking of the ionizable monomers within the hydrophobic polymer. As an example, acidic monomers (e.g. acrylic acid) are polymerized to form an ionic polymer within a preformed thermoplastic, hydrophobic matrix, forming an interpenetrating polymer network (“IPN”). Solvents can be extracted out by heat and convection or by solvent extraction. Solvent extraction involves the use of a different solvent (such as water) to extract the solvent from polymer, while heat or convection relies upon evaporation of the solvent. Depending on the pKa of the ionic polymer (e.g., pKa of PAA=4.7), an acidic pH would leave the ionic polymer more protonated while a more basic pH would leave it more ionized.
Swelling of the IPN in aqueous solution such as phosphate buffered saline (or other buffered salt solution) at neutral pH will lead to ionization of the poly(acrylic acid) and further swelling with water and salts. The resulting swollen IPN will have a lubricious surface conferred by the hydrophilic, charged poly(acrylic acid) and high toughness and mechanical strength conferred by the thermoplastic. In the case of a polyurethane-based IPN, the IPN will have a structure in which crystalline hard segments in the polyurethane act as physical crosslinks in the first network, while chemical crosslinks will be present in the second network.
The materials can also be crosslinked after synthesis using gamma radiation or electron beam radiation. In one example, polyurethane/polyacrylic acid can be synthesized and then crosslinked by gamma irradiation, for instance with doses of, for example, 5, 10, 15, 20, or 25 kGy. In this case, the polymerization of polyacrylic acid would be done in the absence of a crosslinker, and after formation of the polymer blend (physical IPN), the material would be exposed to gamma radiation. This would have the dual purpose of sterilizing and crosslinking the polyurethane. It is known in the art that crosslinking of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels using gamma irradiation shows a dose-dependence to the crosslinking of the polymer. This process can also be applied to other combinations of first and second network polymers, e.g., polyurethane and polymethyl methacrylate, ABS and polyacrylic acid, etc.
In addition to the starting thermoset and thermoplastic hydrophobic polymers identified above, modifications to and derivatives of such polymers may be used, such as sulfonated polyurethanes. In the case of the polyurethanes, the polyurethane polymer can be a commercially available material, a modification of a commercially available material, or be a new material. Any number of chemistries and stoichiometries can be used to create the polyurethane polymer. For the hard segment, isocyanates used are 1,5 naphthalene diisocyanate (NDI), isophorone isocyanate (IPDI), 3,3-bitoluene diisocyanate (TODI), methylene bis (p-cyclohexyl isocyanate) (H12MDI), cyclohexyl diisocyanate (CHDI), 2,6 toluene diisocyanate or 2,4 toluene diisocyanate (TDI), hexamethyl diisocyanate, or methylene bis(p-phenyl isocyanate). For the soft segment, chemicals used include, for example polyethylene oxide (PEO), polypropylene oxide (PPO), poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO), hydroxy terminated butadiene, hydroxybutyl terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyethylene adipate, polycaprolactone, polytetramethylene adipate, hydroxyl terminate polyisobutylene, polyhexamethylene carbonate glycol, poly (1,6 hexyl 1,2-ethyl carbonate, and hydrogenated polybutadiene. Any number of telechelic polymers can be used in the soft segment, if end-groups that are reactive with isocyanates are used. For instance, hydroxyl- or amine-terminated poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), dimethylacrylamide, carboxylate or sulfonated polymers, telechelic hydrocarbon chains (with hydroxyl and/or amine end groups), dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), or these in combination with each other or with other soft segments mentioned above (e.g., PDMS) can be used. Ionic soft segments (or chain extenders) such as dihydroxyethyl propionic acid (DMPA) (or its derivatives) can be used to make a water-dispersible polyurethane, so long as the ionic chain extender does not comprise more than 2% of the material.
Chain extenders include, for example, 1,4 butanediol, ethylene diamine, 4,4′methylene bis (2-chloroaniline) (MOCA), ethylene glycol, and hexane diol. Any other compatible chain extenders can be used alone or in combination. Crosslinking chain extenders can be used containing isocyanate-reactive endgroups (e.g. hydroxyl or amine) and a vinyl-based functional group (e.g. vinyl, methacrylate, acrylate, allyl ether, or acrylamide) may be used in place of some or all of the chain extender. Examples include 1,4 dihydroxybutene and glycerol methacrylate. Alternatively, crosslinking can be achieved through the use of a polyol such as glycerol which contains greater than two hydroxyl groups for reaction with isocyanates.
In some embodiments, at least 2% of the hydrophilic monomers in the second network is ionizable and anionic (capable of being negatively charged). In one such embodiment, poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) hydrogel is used as the second polymer network, formed from an aqueous solution of acrylic acid monomers. Other ionizable monomers include ones that contain negatively charged carboxylic acid or sulfonic acid groups, such as methacrylic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid, sulfopropyl methacrylate (or acrylate), vinyl sulfonic acid, or vinyl-conjugated versions of hyaluronic acid, heparin sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate, as well as derivatives, or combinations thereof. The second network monomer may also be positively charged or cationic. These other monomers can also be in a range of 1%-99% in either water or organic solvent, or be pure (100%). One embodiment of the monomer used to form the second network can be described by the following characteristics: (1) it is capable of swelling the polyurethane, (2) capable of polymerizing, and (3) is ionizable.
Other embodiments use a co-monomer in addition to the ionic polymer that may be non-ionic, such as acrylamide, methacrylamide, N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide, N-isopropylacrylamide, methylmethacrylate, N-vinyl pyrrolidone, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate or derivatives thereof. These can be copolymerized with less hydrophilic species such as methylmethacrylate or other more hydrophobic monomers or macromonomers. These can also be polymerized alone or copolymerized with the aforementioned hydrophilic and/or ionizable monomers.
Crosslinked linear polymer chains (i.e., macromolecules) based on these monomers may also be used in the second network, as well as biomacromolecules (linear or crosslinked) such as proteins and polypeptides (e.g., collagen, hyaluronic acid, or chitosan). The choice of the second material will depend on the target application, for instance in orthopaedic applications, hyaluronic acid may be useful because it is a major component of joint cartilage. In addition, biological molecules may carry certain benefits such as intrinsic biocompatibility or therapeutic (e.g., wound healing and/or antimicrobial) properties that make them useful as material components.
Any type of compatible cross-linkers may be used to crosslink the second network in the presence of any of the aforementioned first networks such as, for example, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, ethylene glycol diacrylate, diethylene glycol dimethacrylate (or diacrylate), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate or diacrylate), tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate (or diacrylate), polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate, or polyethylene glycol diacrylate, methylene bisacrylamide, N,N′-(1,2-dihydroxyethylene) bisacrylamide, derivatives, or combinations thereof. Any number of photoinitiators can also be used depending on their solubility with the precursor solutions/materials. These include, but are not limited to, 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propiophenone and 2-hydroxy-1-[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy) phenyl]-2-methyl-1-propanone. In addition, other initiators such as benzoyl peroxide, 2-oxoglutaric acid, azobisisobutyronitrile, or potassium persulfate (or sodium persulfate) can be used. For instance, benzoyl peroxide is useful for temperature-initiated polymerizations, while azobisisobutyronitrile and sodium persulfate are useful as radical initiators.
In another embodiment, a solvent can be used as a “trojan horse” to deliver monomers that otherwise would not mix (or solubilize with) the polymer to one (or more) phases of the polymer. The solvent must be carefully chosen based on the specific qualities and phases of the polymer and monomers. For instance, acetic acid is capable of swelling but does not dissolve many polyurethanes. Therefore, acetic acid can be used to carry other monomers such an acrylamide solution, that otherwise would not enter polyurethane, into the bulk of the polyurethane. This allows the acrylamide to be selectively polymerized inside one phase of the polyurethane. The acetic acid can then be washed out leaving behind a polyurethane with one or more new properties. Other solvents that can be used include, but are not limited to, dichloromethane, methanol, propanol, butanol, (or any alkyl alcohol), acetone, dimethylacetamide, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran, diethylether, or combinations of these. Taking into account the solubilities in the phases of the polymer, solvents with varying degrees of swelling of one can be chosen. Solubilities of the solvents and components of the material to be swollen can be obtained from polymer textbooks such as The Polymer Handbook or can be measured experimentally.
The present invention can be used to form a bulk-interpenetrated coating on a polymeric material. This coating is inextricably entangled with the underlying polymer matrix, and is in contrast to conventional surface coatings in which a material is grafted or tethered to a surface. In one example of a bulk-interpenetrated coating, a thermoplastic polymer is coated on one or more sides or is immersed in an ionizable monomer such as acrylic acid in the presence of a photoinitiator and a crosslinking agent. The thermoplastic is then placed in a mold and then exposed to an initiator (e.g., UV light or heat) for a predetermined period of time. The mold can be fully or partially transparent and/or masked to facilitate regionally specific curing of the monomer. The modified material is then immersed in buffered saline solution to neutralize the ionic polymer and render the surface lubricious and hydrophilic. The modified plastic can then be further remolded by application of heat, solvent, and/or pressure and then shaped to the desired dimensions. The modified plastic can then be bonded to various surfaces such as metal, glass, plastic, or other materials by applying heat or solvent (such as acetone) to the unmodified plastic surface and bringing the surface in contact with the surface of interest.
Among the applications of the invention are the creation of hydrophilic, lubricious sidings or coatings to reduce drag and/or biofilm formation and/or barnacle formation in marine vessels, diving or swimming suits, other water crafts or water-borne objects, or pipes. In addition, the invention can be used as a method for making bearings and moving parts for applications such as engines, pistons, or other machines or machine parts. The invention can also be used in artificial joints systems or long-term implants in other areas of the body, such stents and catheters for the vascular or urinary system or implants, patches, or dressings for the skin.
In one embodiment, a TP/PAA IPN can be created in a gradient if polyurethane (“PU”) is swollen in AA on one side only or if the swelling time is limited such that diffusion of the monomers through the bulk of the TP is not complete. This is especially useful in the creation of osteochondral grafts for orthopaedic joint replacement materials. For instance, in the case of a cartilage replacement material, one side of the material is made lubricious and water swollen, while the other remains a solid (pure thermoplastic). In between is a transition between a TP/PAA IPN and TP, with decreasing PAA content from one surface to the other. Alternatively, bulk materials with a TP/PAA IPN outer aspect and PU-only “core” can be made if the diffusion of AA into the TP is precisely controlled by timing the infiltration of the monomers into the bulk. The differential swelling that results from this configuration can lead to remaining stresses (compressive on the swollen side, tensile on the non-swollen side) that can help enhance the mechanical and fatigue behavior of the material. In the case of a material with a thickness gradient, the base of thermoplastic-only material can be used for anchoring, adhering, or suturing the device to the anatomical region or interest. This base can be confined to a small area or be large (e.g., a skirt) and can extend outward as a single component or multiple components (e.g., straps). The internal stresses built up within the thermoplastic during processing or after swelling can be reduced by temperature-induced annealing. For instance, temperatures of 60-120 degrees Celsius can be used for various times (30 minutes to many hours) to anneal the polymer, and the heat can be applied in an oven, by a hot surface, by radiation, or by a heat gun. The thermoplastic can later be crosslinked using, for example, gamma or electron beam radiation.
Articles made from the IPN's and semi-IPN's of this invention may also be formed in a laminate structure, as illustrated in
Articles formed from the gradient or homogeneous IPN's and semi-IPN's of this invention may be shaped as desired.
As shown in
Shaping of IPN and semi-IPN articles according to this invention may be formed in situ, such as within a human body. For example,
Shaped or unshaped IPN and semi-IPN articles made according to this invention may be attached to other surfaces.
The composition of this invention, formed, e.g., by the method of this invention, may be used in a variety of settings. One particular use is as artificial cartilage in an osteochondral graft. The present invention provides a bone-sparing arthroplasty device based on an interpenetrating polymer network that mimics the molecular structure, and in turn, the elastic modulus, fracture strength, and lubricious surface of natural cartilage. Emulating at least some of these structural and functional aspects of natural cartilage, the semi-IPNs and IPNs of the present invention form the basis of a novel, bone-sparing, “biomimetic resurfacing” arthroplasty procedure. Designed to replace only cartilage, such a device is fabricated as a set of flexible, implantable devices featuring lubricious articular surfaces and osteointegrable bone-interfaces.
In principle, the device can be made for any joint surface in the body. For example, a device to cover the tibial plateau will require an analogous bone-preparation and polymer-sizing process. For a device to cover the femoral head in the hip joint, a cap shaped device fits snugly over the contours of the femoral head. For a device to line the acetabulum, a hemispherical cup-shaped device stretches over the lip and can be snapped into place in the socket to provide a mating surface with the femoral head. In this way, both sides of a patient's hip joint can be repaired, creating a cap-on-cap articulation. However, if only one of the surfaces is damaged, then only one side may be capped, creating a cap-on-cartilage articulation. In addition, the materials of the present invention can be used to cap or line the articulating surfaces of another joint replacement or resurfacing device (typically comprised of metal) to serve as an alternative bearing surface.
To create a cap-shaped device using the present invention for the shoulder joint (also a ball-and-socket joint), a process similar to that of the hip joint is used. For instance, a shallow cup can be created to line the inner aspect of the glenoid. Furthermore, devices for other joints in the hand, fingers, elbow, ankles, feet, and intervertebral facets can also be created using this “capping” concept. In one embodiment in the distal femur, the distal femur device volume follows the contours of the bone while sparing the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments.
In one embodiment of prosthetic cartilage formed according to this invention, a polyether urethane device pre-formed with shore hardness of 75 D is injection molded. This device is then solution casted in a Vitamin E-containing solution containing polyether urethane formulated to a dry shore hardness of 55 D (e.g., 25% Elasthane™ 55 D in dimethylacetamide). The casted layer may then be dried in a convection oven to remove the solvent. The device may then be immersed in a solution of acrylic acid, photoinitiator, and crosslinker for 24 hours, and then placed over a glass mold and exposed to UV light. The resulting device may then be soaked and washed in phosphate buffered saline. This process is used to create either convex or concave devices for arthroplasty applications. The injection-molded preform has on one of its sides a plurality of spaces (pores or features) that make capable of being anchored to bone with traditional orthopaedic bone cement.
In another embodiment of the device, a polycarbonate urethane pre-formed with surface features on one side is fabricated, followed by dip-casting of one of its sides in a solution of polyether urethane and then subjected to a process similar to the one above. In still another embodiment, a polyether urethane pre-form of shore hardness 55 D (e.g., Elasthane™ 55 D) is injection molded, followed by immersion in a monomer solution as above. After curing of the second polymer network, the device is dip-casted on one side with polycarbonate urethane of shore hardness 75 D. In any of these embodiments, additional surface features can be added to the bone interface side of the device through a number of means, including but not limited to machining (lathe and end-mill), solution casting, solvent-welding, ultrasonic welding, or heat-welding.
Porous polycarbonate urethane IPN and semi-IPN structures may be made according to this invention. Particles (size range: 250-1500 μm) of polycarbonate urethane, including but not limited to Bionate® 55 D, Bionate® 65 D, and Bionate® 75 D, may be sintered in a mold using heat (220-250° C.), pressure (0.001-100 MPa), and/or solvent for 10-30 min. The structures will have a final pore size of 50-2000 μm, porosity of 15-70%, and a compressive strength exceeding 10 MPa. The final structures will have porosity to promote tissue ingrowth/integration for medical and veterinary applications. This construct can be used alone or with an overlying bearing surface made from any of the lubricious polymers described in this invention. This material could be used as a cartilage replacement plug in joints of the body where cartilage has been damaged, as described below.
The composition of this invention, made, e.g., according to the method of this invention, may be used as a fully or partially synthetic osteochondral graft. The osteochondral graft consists of a lubricious, cartilage-like synthetic bearing layer that may be anchored to porous bone or a synthetic, porous bone-like structure. The bearing layer has two regions: a lubricious surface layer and a stiff, bone anchoring layer. In one embodiment, the top, lubricious region of the bearing layer consists of an interpenetrating polymer network that is composed of two polymers. The first polymer may be a hydrophobic thermoplastic with high mechanical strength, including but not limited to polyether urethane, polycarbonate urethane, silicone polyether urethane, and silicone polycarbonate urethanes, or these materials with incorporated urea linkages, or these materials with incorporated urea linkages (e.g. polyurethane urea). The second polymer may be a hydrophilic polymer derived from ionizable, vinyl monomers, including but not limited to acrylic acid and/or sulfopropyl methacrylate. The bottom region of the bearing layer (bone anchoring layer) may be a stiff, non-resorbable thermoplastic that can be caused to flow with ultrasonic welding vibration, ultrasonic energy, laser energy, heat, RF energy and electrical energy. The bone anchoring layer is used to anchor the bearing layer to bone or a bone-like porous structure. If porous bone is used, it can be cancellous bone from a human or animal. If a synthetic bone-like material is used, it can consist of porous calcium-phosphate (and/or other materials, including but not limited to porous carbonated apatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate, or hydroxyapatite), or a porous resorbable or non-resorbable thermoplastic as described above, including but not limited to polycarbonate urethane, polyether urethane, PLA, PLLA, PLAGA, and/or PEEK. The bearing layer is anchored to the porous bone or bone-like structure via application of pressure combined with energy that cause the bone anchoring material to melt and flow into the pores or spaces of the bone or bone-like structure, after which the energy source is removed and the material resolidifies. The energy source can include but is not limited to vibration, ultrasonic energy, laser energy, heat, RF energy, and electrical energy.
The following figures illustrate various embodiments of the present invention as a device to partially or completely resurface damaged joints in the body of mammals (animals or human). These devices can be fixated to bone through any number of means, such as a press-fit, screws (metal or plastic, either resorbable or nonresorbable), sutures (resorbable or nonresorbable), glue, adhesives, light-curable adhesives (e.g. polyurethane or resin-based), or cement (such as polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate, or dental cements).
Implants and other articles may be made in a variety of complex shapes according to the invention.
Osteochondral grafts may also be used in other joints, such as in the finger, hand, ankle, elbow, feet or vertebra. For example,
The IPN's and semi-IPN's compositions of this invention may be formed as prosthetic cartilage plugs for partial resurfacing of joint surfaces.
Screw holes may be provided to the osteochondral graft for fixation to the bone. In
In
Many of the osteochondral grafts and other implants described above are affixed to a single bone surface.
The invention has non-medical applications. For example,
The materials of the present invention have utility in applications requiring electrochemical conductivity. The conductivity of the IPNs and semi-IPNs is based on the flow of ions through the hydrated matrix of the material. Thin films of polyetherurethane were swelled with four different compositions of an acrylic acid and water mixture (15, 30, 50, and 70% acrylic acid in water). Each swelled film was then cured in UV light to form the semi-IPN. The films were then neutralized in PBS. The electrical resistance of the materials was measured using an ohm meter. To measure resistance, the IPN film was lightly patted with a paper towel to remove excess PBS and the ohm meter probes were clipped to the film across a film width of 60-70 mm. The initial and steady-state resistance values were recorded. In addition, the resistances of an unmodified polyetherurethane film and liquid PBS were measured. The resistance of PBS was measured by placing the ohm meter probes directly into a PBS bath at an approximate distance of 60 mm between the probes. Resistance measurements are in the following Table.
The results show that the resistances of the semi-IPNs are lower than (but within the same order of magnitude as) pure PBS fluid alone. The limit of the ohm meter was 40,000 ohms. Typical values for insulators (including polyurethanes) are 1014-1016 ohms; therefore, the resistance values of the PEU alone were outside the range of the meter used. Permeability of the PEU/PAA semi-IPN was measured using a device similar to the one described by Maroudas et al. in Permeability of articular cartilage. Nature, 1968. 219(5160): p. 1260-1. The permeability was calculated according to Darcy's Law (Q=KAΔp/L), where Q is the flow rate [mm3/sec], A the cross-sectional area of the plug [mm2], Δp the pressure gradient applied [MPa] (pressurized fluid), L is the thickness of the hydrogel. The permeability of the PEU/P AA semi-IPN prepared from 70% acrylic acid was found to be K=1.45×10−17 m4/N*sec. For natural cartilage, literature values range from 1.5×10−16 to 2×10−15 m4/N*sec. Therefore, the PEU/PAA is 10-100 times less permeable than cartilage, which may make it less prone to dehydration under prolonged compressive loads compared to natural cartilage. The permeability of the IPN can be tuned by varying the concentration of AA in the swelling solution; the higher the AA content, the higher the permeability. In contrast, the unmodified PEU material alone is effectively impermeable to solutes; although it retains some moisture (˜1%), in practice it does not act as a solute-permeable matrix.
Other variations and modifications to the above compositions, articles and methods include:
The first polymer can be one that is available commercially or custom-made and made by a number of ways (e.g., extruded, injection molded, compression molded, reaction injection molded (RIM) or solution-casted.) The first polymer can be uncrosslinked or crosslinked by various means. Either polymer can be crosslinked by, e.g., gamma radiation or electron beam radiation.
Any number or combinations of ethylenically unsaturated monomers or macromonomers (e.g., containing reactive double bonds) can be used as the basis of the second or subsequent network so long as the total contains at least 2% by weight ionizable chemical groups. These include but are not limited those containing vinyl, acrylate, methacrylate, allyl ether, or acrylamide groups. And number of pendant functional groups can be conjugated to these ethylenically unsaturated groups including but not limited to carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid, acetates, alcohols, ethers, phenols, aromatic groups, or carbon chains.
The polyurethane-based polymer can be (but is not limited to) the following: polyether urethane, polycarbonate urethane, polyurethane urea, silicone polyether urethane, or silicone polycarbonate urethane. Other polyurethanes with other hard segments, soft segments, and chain extenders are possible.
Other polymers can be used in the first network, such as homopolymers or copolymers of silicone (polydimethylsiloxane) or polyethylene.
When a polyurethane-based polymer is used as the first polymer, the extent of physical and chemical crosslinking of the polyurethane-based polymer can be varied between physical crosslinking-only (thermoplastic) to extensive chemical crosslinking. In the case of chemical crosslinking, the crosslinkable polyurethane can be used alone or as a mixture with thermoplastic (uncrosslinked) polyurethane.
The conditions of polymerization (i.e., ambient oxygen, UV intensity, UV wavelength, exposure time, temperature) may be varied.
The orientation and steepness of the composition gradients can be varied by various means such as time and/or method of immersion in the monomer, and the application of external hydrostatic positive or negative pressure.
The thermoplastic can be made porous by various techniques such as foaming or salt-leaching. After swelling of the porous polymer (such as PU) with a monomer (such as AA) followed by polymerization or AA, a porous IPN is formed.
Additional layers of thermoplastics can be added to material on either the IPN side or the thermoplastic side-only by curing or drying the new thermoplastic to the surface. The layers can all be the same material or be different materials (e.g. ABS+polyurethane, polyether urethane+polycarbonate urethane, etc.
A number of different solvents can be used during the synthesis of the polyurethane, the second network, or both, including but not limited to dimethylacetamide, tetrahydrofuran, dimethylformamide, ethanol, methanol, acetone, water, dichloromethane, propanol, methanol, or combinations thereof.
Any number of initiators can be used such as photoinitiators (e.g., phenone-containing compounds and Irgacure® products), thermal initiators, or chemical initiators. Examples of thermal initiators include but are not limited to azo-compounds, peroxides (e.g., benzoyl peroxide), persulfates (e.g., potassium persulfate or ammonium persulfate), derivatives, or combinations thereof.
Variations of the crosslinking identity and density (e.g. 0.0001%-25% by mole crosslinking agent with respect to the monomer), initiator concentration (e.g. 0.0001%-10% by mole with respect to the monomer) molecular weight of precursor polymers, relative weight percent of polymers, light wavelength (UV to visible range), light intensity (0.01 mW/cm2-1 W/cm2), temperature, pH and ionic strength of swelling liquid, and the level of hydration.
The second network material can be synthesized in the absence of a crosslinking agent.
The water content of these materials can range between 2% to 99%.
Different components of the IPN can be incorporated in combination with ionizable monomers, such as poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ethylene glycol)-acrylate, poly(2-hydroxyethylacrylate), poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate), poly(methacrylic acid), poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid), other vinyl-group containing sulfonic acids, poly(acrylamide), poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) poly(dimethacrylamide), and combinations or derivatives thereof. For instance, a copolymer of acrylic acid and vinyl sulfonic acid or 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid can be created for the second network to form a polyurethane first network and a poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonic acid) copolymeric second network. Any monomer or combination of monomers can be used in conjunction with a suitable solvent as long as they contain at least 2% by weight ionizable monomer and are able to enter (swell) the first polymer.
The IPN can have incorporated either chemically or physically within its bulk or its surface certain additives such as antioxidants (e.g., Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Irganox®, or santowhite powder) and/or anti-microbial agents (e.g., antibiotics). These can be chemically linked to the material by, for example, esterification of the anti-oxidant with any vinyl-group containing monomer such as methacrylate, acrylate, acrylamide, vinyl, or allyl ether.
More than two networks (e.g., three or more) can also be formed, each of which are either crosslinked or uncrosslinked.
The polyurethane itself can be modified in a number of ways, such as by sulfonation at the urethane group by reaction of 1,3 propane sulfone in the presence of sodium hydride, or the formation of allophanate linkages at the urethane group by reaction with excess isocyanate groups. For instance, excess isocyanatoethyl methacrylate can be reacted with polyurethane in toluene in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate for 2.5 hours to yield a methacryloxy-conjugated polyurethane surface. The methacryloxy groups can then be used subsequently tether other methacryloxy (or other vinyl group)-containing monomers or macromonomers via free radical polymerization. Such modifications can be carried out before or after the formation of the second network of the IPN.
In one example, a polycarbonate urethane (Bionate 55 D) was immersed in 70% acrylic acid in water containing 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer overnight. The polycarbonate urethane was removed from the solution, placed between two glass slides, and exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes. The resulting semi-IPN was removed, and washed and swollen in phosphate buffered saline. The material swelled and became lubricious within hours. In other examples, segmented polyurethane urea, as well as silicone polyether urethane and silicone polycarbonate urethanes were placed in acrylic acid solutions and polymerized and washed in the same fashion to yield a lubricious IPN.
In another example, a polyether urethane (Elasthane™ 55 D) was immersed in 70% acrylic acid in water containing 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer overnight. The polyether urethane was removed from the solution, placed between two glass slides, and then exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes. The resulting semi-IPN was removed and then washed and swollen in phosphate buffered saline. The material swelled and became lubricious within hours. In other examples, polycarbonate urethane, segmented polyurethane urea, as well as silicone polyether urethane and silicone polycarbonate urethanes were placed in acrylic acid solutions and polymerized and washed in the same fashion to yield lubricious IPNs.
In another example, silicone polyether urethane and silicone polycarbonate urethanes were separately placed overnight in 100% acrylic acid solutions, to which were added 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer. After polymerization and crosslinking, the semi-IPNs swelled and became lubricious. The addition of silicone (polydimethylsiloxane) in the polyurethane adds an extra level of biostability to the material as well as potentially useful surface chemistry and properties.
In another example, a methacryloxy-functionalized polycarbonate urethane was exposed to UV light to crosslink the polycarbonate urethane, and then swollen in 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer overnight. The material was removed from the solution, placed between two glass slides, and then exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polycarbonate urethane and poly(acrylic acid.) The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane was exposed to UV light (in the presence of 0.1% 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) to crosslink the polyetherurethane, and then was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with the aforementioned photoinitiator and crosslinker followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyetherurethane and poly(acrylic acid.) The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a 25% solution of methacryloxy-functionalized polycarbonate urethane in DMAC along with 0.1% of the aforementioned photoinitiator was exposed to UV light to crosslink the polycarbonate urethane. After removing the solvent in a heated (60° C.) convection oven, an additional layer of polycarbonate urethane was then cast on one side of the crosslinked polycarbonate urethane to yield a laminate structure and then only the crosslinked side was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with the 0.1% 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polycarbonate urethane and poly(acrylic acid.) The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a 25% solution of methacryloxy-functionalized polycarbonate urethane in DMAC along with 0.1% of the aforementioned photoinitiator was exposed to UV light to crosslink the polyether urethane. After removing the solvent in a heated (60° C.) convection oven, an additional layer of polyether urethane was then cast on one side of the crosslinked polycarbonate urethane to yield a laminate structure and then only the crosslinked side was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid.) The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another set of examples, a layer of methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane was cast onto a layer of injection molded polyether urethane, and separately, another layer was cast onto a layer of injection molded polycarbonate urethane. Each was exposed to UV light, to yield laminate structures. Only the crosslinked sides were swollen in 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer networks. The IPNs were then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In one example, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) was exposed to 100% acrylic acid in water containing 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer for 15 minutes. The surface-exposure was accomplished by drop-casting the monomer solution on the surface of the ABS for 30 minutes. The ABS was then placed between two glass slides, and then exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes. The resulting ABS/PAA gradient IPN was removed and then washed and swollen in phosphate buffered saline. The IPN was washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers. The material swelled and became lubricious within hours.
To reshape the thermoplastic gradient IPNs, heat was applied. An ABS/PAA gradient IPN was heated using a heat gun and then laid on a cylindrical polypropylene tube. After letting the material cool to room temperature, acetone was injected between the ABS/PAA and the thermoplastic gradient IPN wrapped around and bonded to a polypropylene tube. After applying manual pressure and allowing the sample to dry, the result was a thermoplastic gradient IPN wrapped around and bonded to a polypropylene tube.
In another example, a thermoplastic gradient ABS/PAA IPN was attached to polycarbonate urethane by injecting acetone between the ABS and polycarbonateurethane and applying manual pressure to yield a thermoplastic gradient IPN bonded to a polycarbourethane.
In another example, a curved polycarbonate urethane IPN was made straight again by applying heat on the polyurethane side using a heat gun, manually reversing the curvature of the material, and cooling the IPN in water.
In another example, a polyether urethane solution (e.g. 20% in dimethylacetamide (“DMAC”)) was cast on top of a polycarbonate urethane in a laminate structure, allowed to dry in a heated (60° C.) convection oven, and then only the polyether urethane surface was exposed to 70% acrylic acid in water containing 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer for 15 minutes. The surface-exposure was accomplished by laying the laminate material polyether urethane-side down on a bed of fabric that was soaked in the aforementioned monomer solution. The material was removed from the fabric mat, placed between two glass slides, and then exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes. The resulting gradient semi-IPN was removed, washed and swollen in phosphate buffered saline. The material swelled and became lubricious within hours. In other examples, polyether urethane, segmented polyurethane urea, silicone polyether urethane, and silicone polycarbonate urethane were handled the same way to yield a lubricious semi-IPNs.
In another example, a layer of polycarbonate urethane (20% in DMAC) containing 50% by weight sodium chloride was solution cast on a premade polyether urethane-polycarbonate urethane and dried at 80° C. under convection. The salt was washed away in water to yield a porous side on the laminated polyurethane. Other materials have been made with sodium chloride concentrations varying between 10% and 80%
In another example, a layer of polycarbonate urethane (20% in DMAC) containing 20% tricalcium phosphate was solution cast on a premade polyether urethane-polycarbonate urethane and dried at 80° C. under convection. The tricalcium phosphate was left embedded within the polyurethane as an osteoconductive agent. Other materials have been made with tricalcium phosphate concentrations varying from 0.001%-20%
In another example, a polyurethane urea (e.g. 20% in dimethylacetamide) was cast on top of a polycarbonate urethane in a laminate structure, and then only the polyurethane urea surface was exposed to 70% acrylic acid in water containing 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with respect to the monomer for 15 minutes. The surface-exposure was accomplished by laying the laminate material polyurethane urea-side down on a bed of fabric that was soaked in the aforementioned monomer solution. The polycarbonate urethane was removed from the fabric mat, placed between two glass slides, and then exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes. The resulting gradient semi-IPN was removed and then washed and swollen in phosphate buffered saline. The material swelled and became lubricious within hours. The material was washed in PBS to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane mixed with a thermoplastic polyether urethane in solution (25% in dimethylacetamide) was exposed to UV light to crosslink the polycarbonate urethane. An additional layer of polyether urethane was then cast on one side of the crosslinked polyether urethane to yield a laminate structure and then only the crosslinked side was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with the aforementioned photoinitiator and crosslinker, followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid.) The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In one example, flat sheets were created by solution casting of thermoplastic polyurethanes in (dimethylacetamide (DMAC). Polyurethane solutions of polyether urethane (Elasthane™), polycarbonate urethane (Bionate), polyether urethane urea (Biospan), silicone polycarbonate urethane (Carbosil), and silicone polyether urethane (Pursil) were synthesized in dimethylacetamide (DMAC) at solids concentrations of about 25% by the manufacturer.
Spherical shapes were cast by dip-coating glass as well as silicone spheres in polyurethane solutions (in DMAC). Polycarbonate urethane (20% in DMAC) was dip coated onto a spherical glass mold (49.5 mm outer diameter), and separately, onto a silicone sphere. The solvent was removed by drying at 80° C. in a convection oven. This process was repeated two more times to create three total coatings. Then, the sphere was dip coated in polyether urethane (20% in DMAC) and then dried at 80° C. under convection. This process was also repeated two more times. The resulting capped-shaped, laminate polyurethane was removed from the mold, and its outer side immersed in a 70% acrylic acid solution in water, with 0.1% 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propiophenone and 0.1% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate for 1.5 hours. The cap was inverted, placed back over a spherical glass mold, and exposed to UV light (2 mW/cm2) for 15 minutes. Next the cap was removed from the mold and placed in phosphate buffered saline. The result was a spherical, gradient IPN with one lubricious surface and one pure thermoplastic surface. Other temperatures and other solvents can also be used to carry out this process, as well as other mold materials and polymer components.
In another example, a polyether urethane was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% methylene bisacrylamide. One side of the material was dabbed dry, and then exposed to air and treated with UV light. The resulting gradient semi-IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers. In other experiments, the material was exposed to nitrogen or argon during curing.
In another example, a polyether urethane (Elasthane™ 55 D) was injection molded and then swollen in 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The JPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a polyether urethane (Elasthane™ 75 D) was injection molded, dip-casted (solution casted) on one side in a polyether urethane solution (Elasthane™ 55 D in 25% DMAC) and dried in a convection oven to remove the DMAC solvent. The dried material was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with the 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a polycarbonate urethane (Bionate 75 D) was injection molded, dip-casted (solution casted) on one side in a polyether urethane solution (Elasthane™ 55 D in 25% DMAC) and dried in a convection oven to remove the DMAC solvent. The dried material was swollen in 70% acrylic acid with 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a polyether urethane (Elasthane™ 75 D) was injection molded and then dip-casted (solution casted) in a methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane solution (Elasthane™ 55 D in 25% DMAC) along with the aforementioned photoinitiator and then was exposed to UV light to crosslink the methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane. The material was then dried in a convection oven to remove the DMAC solvent. The dried material was then swollen in 70% acrylic acid with the 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a polycarbonate urethane (Bionate 75 D) was injection molded and then dip-casted (solution casted) in a methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane solution (Elasthane™ 55 D in 25% DMAC) and then was exposed to UV light to crosslink the methacryloxy-functionalized polyether urethane. The material was then dried in a convection oven to remove the DMAC solvent. The dried material was then swollen in 70% acrylic acid with the 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a polyether urethane (Elasthane™ 55 D) solution casted and then swollen in 35% sulfopropyl methacrylate in acetic acid with 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The semi-IPN was then washed with water to remove the acetic acid, and then in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a polyether urethane (Elasthane™ 55 D) solution casted and then swollen in 35% sulfopropyl methacrylate and 35% acrylic acid in water with the 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the polyether urethane and poly(acrylic acid). The semi-IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid)/poly(sulfopropyl methacrylate) copolymer, achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a rectangular sample of PMMA (plexiglass) was swollen briefly in 100% acrylic acid in water with the 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% w/w methylene bisacrylamide followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the PMMA and poly(acrylic acid). The IPN was then washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
In another example, a rectangular specimen of polydimethyl sulfoxide (PDMS, Sylgard® 184) was prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications and then was swollen briefly in a 35% acrylic acid solution in tetrahydrofuran along with 0.1% v/v 2-hydroxy-2-methyl propiophenone and 0.1% v/v triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, followed by UV-initiated crosslinking to yield a fully interpenetrating polymer network of the PDMS and poly(acrylic acid). The IPN was washed in an aqueous salt solution to neutralize the poly(acrylic acid), achieve equilibrium swelling, and remove any unreacted monomers.
The contact angle between the charged hydrogel IPN made by this invention and water was determined. Briefly, a sheet of Elasthane™ 55 D (polyetherurethane) was soaked in acrylic acid with initiator and cross-linker, and cured to form a semi-IPN (PEU/PAA semi IPN). After curing, the charged PEU/PAA semi IPN was hydrated in phosphate buffered saline. The material was removed from the solution and its surface briefly dabbed to remove any residual liquid. A drop of water was placed on the surface of the material, and the contact angle read using a Goniometer. The results showed a contact angle of approximately 8°. For comparison, readings taken on starting materials of solution-casted polyurethanes and injection-molded polyurethane had contact angles of approximately 72° and 69°, respectively. This result demonstrates that the incorporation of a poly(acrylic acid) network into polyurethane according to the current invention dramatically increases surface hydrophilicity.
The differences in the structures of the charged hydrogel IPN and polyurethane are shown by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). TEM creates a highly magnified image of a material. TEM was performed on samples of polyetherurethane/poly(acrylic) acid semi IPN (PEU/PAA semi IPN) of the current invention and of unmodified polyetherurethane. Briefly, a sheet of Elasthane™ 55 D (polyetherurethane) was soaked in acrylic acid with initiator and cross-linker, and cured. It was stained with osmium tetroxide per standard procedures to perform TEM analysis.
The coefficient of friction μ of a PEU/PAA semi-IPN of this invention against itself was measured real-time during a wear test using a built-in torque cell, and was found to range between 0.015 to 0.06, and as shown in
The coefficient of friction is a number that indicates the force resisting lateral motion of an object. It is expressed as a unitless ratio of the frictional force to the normal force. The dynamic coefficient of friction for the polyether urethane/polyacrylic acid (PEU/PAA) semi-IPN on was tested on metal, and the dynamic coefficient of friction is shown as a function of time. Briefly, a piece of Elasthane™ 55 D (polyetherurethane) was soaked in acrylic acid with an initiator and cross-linker, and cured to form a water swellable semi-IPN of the present invention. Plugs 8.8 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick were cut, swollen in PBS, and then rotated at a frequency of 1 Hz against a 3/16″ stainless steel disc at a contact stress of 2.0 MPa while being submerged in PBS. Using a custom-made wear tester made according to ASTM F732 standards equipped with both a force load cell and a torque load cell, the dynamic coefficient of friction was measured real-time during the wear test experiment. The dynamic coefficient of friction of the material varied between 0.005 and 0.015 over a period of 36 hours.
Wear experiments of the PEU/PAA semi-IPN of this invention were conducted according to ASTM F732 using a pin-on-disc configuration. Results are shown in
In the test of the PEU/PAA semi IPN of this invention, the pins were 8.8 mm in diameter, 2.5 mm in thickness. The disc was 88 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in thickness. The pins were rotated over the disc at a radius of 24 mm and at a rate of 1.33 Hz under a pneumatically applied cyclic load. A pressure regulator was used to adjust the air pressure so that the desired force was applied. The load was measured using a load cell (Sensotec Honeywell, CA) directly under the disc. The disc and the pins were mechanically isolated so that the torque caused by the friction generated between them can be measured by a torque cell (Transducer Techniques, CA) connected to a computer equipped with a data acquisition card (National Instruments, TX). The pin and discs were contained in a chamber filled with PBS. The temperature was controlled and kept constant at 37° C. using a thermocouple-resistor-fan system. Using the equation μ=T/r*F, where T is the measured torque, r is the radius of rotation(=24 mm) and F being the total force applied on the pins, the coefficient of friction was constantly monitored. The coefficient of friction was found to be 0.016 and independent of the contact pressure (range tested 0.1-3.5 MPa) and slightly increased to 0.021 under heavy static contact load, but returned to the original value after fluid recovery. The wear was measured using the gravimetric method every million cycles: the disc and the pins were weighed separately after vacuum drying for 3 days. The wear test solution (PBS) was collected and visually examined; no signs of visible wear particles were noted at all steps of the tests. The wear test PBS solution was vacuum filtered using a 2.5 μm pore filter to capture any wear particles, flushed with deionized water to remove remaining PBS salts and then dried overnight under vacuum and desiccant. As a control, a similar test was performed using CoCr pins (Fort Wayne Metals, IN) on UHMWPE (Orthoplastics, UK). Three polished (Ra<1.6 μm) CoCr flat pins of OD=7 mm were tested in the same instrument against a polished UHMWPE disc of 2.5 mm thickness and OD=88 mm (rotation radius=24 mm), rotating at 1.2 Hz under 3.4 MPa static contact load and at 37° C. isolated environment.
Observation of the disc formed from the PEU/PAA semi-IPN of this invention after the test (
Weighing of the wear test solution filtrate using a scale with a 0.01 mg resolution (Mettler Toledo, Ohio) showed that the volumetric wear rate of the PEU/PAA semi-IPN was approximately 0.6 mg/106 cycles or 0.63 mm3/106 cycles or 0.63 mm3/150×103 m. This value, however is close to the resolution of the methods. A schematic of the wear test solution from the wear test of the inventive joint interface material comprised of PEU/PAA semi-IPN is shown in
Although attention was paid to eliminate external factors such as dust, moisture and static in order to increase the accuracy of the results, the wear values are well near the statistical and practical detection limits of the methods available. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that since the PEU/PAA semi IPN according to the present invention—like natural cartilage—is comprised of mostly water, and the surface is persistently lubricated with a film of water, there is little, if any, contact between solid matrices.
Wear particle measurements were also taken for the CoCr-on-UHMWPE experiments, which not only created a visible wear track (
The swelling of polyetherurethane by acrylic acid in water and acetic acid was tested. Swelling solutions were prepared containing 10, 30, 50, and 70% acrylic acid monomer in deionized water (
Swelling solutions were prepared containing 10, 30, 50, and 70% acrylic acid monomer in deionized water and in acetic acid. Small pieces of Elasthane™ 55 D (polyetherurethane) were obtained and weighed. Samples were placed in each of the water/acrylic acid or acetic acid/acrylic acid solutions along with cross-linker and initiator. The samples were cured, swollen in acrylic acid in either water or acetic acid, removed from the solution, dried, and then weighed again. Incorporation of acrylic acid into the Elasthane™ 55 D to form a semi-IPN was observed using either water or acetic acid as solvent. More incorporation of acrylic acid was observed when a higher concentration of acrylic acid was present in the swelling solution.
Semi IPNs were prepared essentially as described in
A sample of the PEU/PAA semi IPN was removed and measured in the direction of its thickness, subject to cycles of compressive stress from 0-3 MPa at a frequency of 1 Hz for over 60,000 cycles, measured again in the direction of its thickness, re-equilibrated (relaxed) in PBS to allow for recovery from creep, and measured again in the direction of its thickness.
A static creep test was also performed (data not shown). Creep is the time-dependent deformation of a material under a constant load. The behavior of the PEU/PAA semi IPN tested under static compression was tested following ASTM D2290-01 “Standard Test Methods for Tensile, Compressive, and Flexural Creep and Creep-Rupture of Plastics”. A plug of the PEU/PAA semi IPN with an initial diameter of 9.525 mm and a thickness of 1.115 mm was put under an initial stress 4 MPa in a fluid PBS bath. After applying the stress for approximately 20,000 seconds (to a total strain of 14.29%), the load was released and the material allowed to relax (re-equilibrate) in PBS. The final thickness of the plug was 1.109 mm. The final unrecovered creep after more than 40,000 cycles was 2.7%.
Another aspect of the invention provides an orthopedic implant with a bone interfacing member that may be conducive to bone in-growth and a water swellable IPN or semi-IPN. The addition of a water-swellable IPN or semi-IPN to a bone interfacing member (e.g. a rigid or mostly rigid, ceramic, metal, or polymeric member placed in contact with the bone) may provide certain advantages, such as by taking advantage of current knowledge and surgical expertise related to accepted orthopedic implants while overcoming some of the disadvantages of such implants.
Another aspect of the invention provides a synthetic “joint capsule” that may surround or partially surround or connect with other components of the device. The joint capsule may function as a self-contained fluid reservoir for the implant. In particular, in a hip implant (e.g. a femoral or acetabular component), a synthetic “joint capsule” may surround the femoral, acetabular, and/or labral components and provide lubricant in-between the femoral and acetabular components.
Another aspect of the invention provides other components for providing support, lubrication, and/or spacing to a joint of a body. For example, the addition of a “labral” or ring-like component that contours the acetabular rim or the shoulder joint, or a meniscal component that contours an outer aspect of a tibial plateau could act as a buffer between acetabular/femoral components, humeral head/glenoid, or femoral/tibial components of an implant similar to way the natural labrum and meniscus function.
One aspect of the invention is an orthopaedic implant comprising a hydration, stiffness, and/or compositional gradient polymer alloy (an IPN or semi-IPN) that is fused (e.g. along an attachment zone) to a bone interfacing member.
In one embodiment, a semi-IPN or IPN may include a compositional gradient polymer alloy (an IPN or semi-IPN) with a second gradient made of PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate). The PMMA may form a second gradient from a portion of a gradient IPN or semi-IPN to an attachment zone. In a particular example, the gradient polymer alloy may include polyurethane and poly(acrylic acid) and the second gradient may be PMMA. In this embodiment, methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomers may be diffused into a polyurethane side or zone of a gradient IPN or semi IPN comprising polyurethane and poly(acrylic acid), then polymerized to form an IPN or semi-IPN of PMMA and polyurethane within the attachment zone. This yields an attachment zone with affinity and adhesiveness for PMMA bone cement according to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/219,348 filed Aug. 26, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,883,915. This gradient IPN with a PMMA-containing attachment zone can therefore be adhered to a bone interface member comprising a metal, a polymer (such as PMMA bone cement), or ceramic.
A bone interfacing member may be any material, but preferably is one useful in orthopaedics and biocompatible, such as a metal, ceramic, or polymer. A bone interfacing member may be any metal, such as aluminum, cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, stainless steel, titanium, or combinations or alloys thereof and/or any other metals used in biomedical implants. A bone interfacing member may be any polymer that is sufficiently strong and biocompatible, such as PEEK, polyurethane, or UHMWPE. For simplicity, a bone interfacing member will be referred to as a metal, but it should be understood any material that connects a polymer gradient alloy to a bone can be used. A metal may be substantially solid, porous, etched, coated, or otherwise treated to aid in attaching the metal to bone and/or attaching a gradient polymer alloy to the metal, or may have a combination of these characteristics or treatments. A porous metal includes but is not limited to porous “trabecular” metal, porous metal foam, sintered metal beads (e.g. that form a porous structure), plasma sprayed porous metal, and/or chemically etched porous metal. A portion of the metal may be solid, porous, rough, etched, coated with osteoconductive material (e.g. calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite), or otherwise treated and another portion not solid, porous, etched, coated, or otherwise not treated. In one example, a metal is porous on the bone contacting surface. In another example, a metal is porous on a polymer alloy facing side. In another example, a metal is porous on both a bone contacting surface and a polymer alloy facing side. A hydration gradient polymer alloy may be a combination of a hydrophilic polymer and a hydrophobic polymer, such that one side of the alloy is hydrophilic and hydrated, and the other side non-hydrated and hydrophobic. The latter side may be mechanically interdigitated or chemically bound with a metal bone interfacing construct. If a porous metal is used, the porosity may be any that allows or aids in attaching to a gradient polymer alloy or in attaching to bone. The porosity of the metal may be similar to the porosity of cancellous bone.
The gradient polymer alloy can be attached, connected or bound to the metal in any way.
In one example, the gradient polymer alloy was placed in contact with a porous metal specimen that was heated past the melting point of the polymer backing material. The two materials were compressed together under a load of, for example, 1 metric ton, and then allowed to cool. The result was a gradient polymer alloy fused to a porous metal. Examples of porous metals used were aluminum and titanium.
The use of porous metal or polymer in combination with a gradient polymer alloy allows for bone in-growth into the metal or polymeric bone-facing side of a device to create a strong but lubricious joint replacement having gradual transition from hydrated surface to strong bone. Polymer/metal and metal/bone regions of overlap are shown in
In one example, a gradient polymer alloy can be physically snap-fitted into a metal mating component with a non-porous smooth contact surface and a counter-surface (bone contact surface) configured for attaching to bone that is porous, rough, and/or coated with osteoconductive material such as calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite. In this case, a gradient polymer alloy component may be used similarly to the way that existing ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cups are fitted into metal backing components.
In another example, a gradient polymer alloy can be physically snap-fitted into a mating, polymeric component with a non-porous smooth contact surface (attachment surface) and a counter-surface (bone contact surface) meant for anchoring to bone. A counter-surface may be porous or non-porous. A counter surface may be coated with an osteoconductive material such as calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite. Anchoring a gradient polymer alloy to bone can be achieved through any suitable means including one or more of: 1) bone ingrowth into a porous counter-surface (bone contacting surface), 2) briefly melting an entire surface or portions of a surface of a solid counter-surface and causing the material to flow into the bone pores, and solidifying the material to form a grout-like anchoring, 3) using or applying adhesive, cement (e.g. polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)), epoxy, glue, or grout, to bind (e.g. chemically) or mechanically hold a counter-surface to bone.
In another example, a gradient polymer alloy may be chemically bonded to a metal portion or implant. Either (or both) sides of a metal maybe smooth, porous, or rough. Any number or type of chemical bonds may be made. In one embodiment a urethane linkage is formed between a polyurethane-based gradient polymer alloy and a tribochemically modified metal surface through reaction of terminal isocyanates in the polymer precursor and reactive —OH groups on the metal surface. A metal surface can be tribochemically modified with oxides, which can subsequently be further modified to hydroxyl groups, which can in turn be chemically reacted with free isocyanate groups to form an isocyanate chemical bond (see Myung et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0241214). The gradient polymer alloy can also be joined to the bone interfacing member using or applying adhesive, cement (e.g. polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)), epoxy, glue, or grout.
A gradient polymer bound to a metal surface may have any thickness. A gradient polymer may form a thin coating or layer over a metal surface. A coating or layer may be less than 30, less than 25, less than 20, less than 15, or less than 10 mm in a thickest region. In one particular example, a coating on a metal is less than 5 mm in a thickest region.
A gradient polymer alloy may be polyurethane based, and the polyurethane side of the alloy may be physically fused with a porous metal by melting a portion of the polyurethane and flowing it into pores of the metal, and then cooling the metal and polyurethane. Because a polyurethane side of a gradient polymer can be tough and hydrophobic, it is able to robustly anchor to the porous metal with an interface that is highly resistant to extreme and repetitive mechanical stresses.
An implant or device may be made after separate fabrication of a gradient material and a porous metal, and then the material and metal are fused. They may be fused by heating the metal, apposing the material and the metal, compressing the material and metal together, and then cooling the metal. In this way, the hydrophobic side of a gradient polymer is “melted” into the pores of a porous metal. Alternatively, a precursor of a gradient polymer can be injected molded directly onto a (pre-fabricated) porous metal, followed by post-processing of the polymer to yield a gradient polymer that is fused to the metal.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a synthetic joint capsule may be implanted. A synthetic joint capsule may surround one or both (or may be near, but not surround) implant components. A capsule component(s) may be closed or sealed to contain a fluid such that fluid cannot move in and out of a volume or space created, at least in part, by the capsule.
A joint capsule may be part of a gradient polymer and porous metal combination implant, or may be present in an implant having a gradient polymer without a porous metal component. A synthetic labral component may also be used in combination with the femoral and acetabular components, with or without a synthetic joint capsule component. The same holds true for the humeral head and glenoid in a shoulder joint.
The capsule's geometry and shape may similar to all or part of a natural joint capsule, which normally provides stability to the joint. In one example, a synthetic joint capsule contains a phosphate buffered saline or normal saline solution, which may serve as a lubricant fluid for a gradient polymer bearing surface(s). A synthetic capsule may be manufactured as an attached part of one or more bearing components, or may be a separate part. It may be assembled either pre-operatively or intra-operatively with another joint component(s). In another example, the capsule may be filled with a lubricant, such as a lubricating polymer (e.g. carboxymethyl cellulose, hyaluronic acid, or sodium polyacrylate).
The addition of a synthetic capsule may provide advantages, such as protection against dislocation, containment of wear debris, protection of the articular interface against host cells, or bone or cement particles, and/or creation of a one-piece device that may be implanted in a single step, much like an interpositional spacer device.
A total cartilage replacement metal device with a polymer cap-on-cup surface may be placed in a joint.
An implant according to the disclosure may be assembled before insertion into a joint region or two or more parts may be assembled intraoperatively while in the joint.
For a femoral device, a gradient IPN “cap” may be designed to fit on top of a metal femoral cap. A modular arrangement may allow a wider range of size interchangeability and tolerances in terms of the fit between a convex and concave joint surface. In addition, it may allow for various cup geometries for different pathologies. For example, it would allow for metal cups/backings with screw holes for additional fixation in the case of poor bone. It may also allow for a dysplasia cup and finned cups. A modular arrangement gives flexibility to adapt to patient needs and surgeon preference, which may be decided intra-operatively. The modularity may be enabled by mechanism. Modularity may be enabled by a locking mechanism, such as a taper, deforming tab, and a “screw-in” mechanisms. Typically, with modular systems on the market today, the liner (poly, ceramic, metal) is assembled to the metal cup as a last step. This allows the surgeon to perform a final trialing prior to final implantation. It also gives the surgeon the option to use a lipped liner for additional stability should he deem it necessary at time of surgery. Any of these mechanisms may also be used with a non-modular (e.g. preassembled) device. Modularity also provides the option of replacing just the bearing materials in the artificial joint for various reasons without disturbing the bone interfacing members.
Another aspect of the invention provides methods and implants for changing a shape of an implant. A metal, especially a porous metal, may have some ability to deform (e.g. bend, crimp, expand, fold, stretch, twist) or otherwise change a shape under an applied stress. A shape change may be transient. A metal may deform by bending one or more struts or regions along a metal meshwork.
In one example, an implant may cover an area greater than 180 degrees of a bone. For example, a hip implant for a femoral cap may encompass greater than 180 degrees, as shown in
An implant having a porous metal surface and a flexible or deformable polymer may change a shape. Any metal that can change a shape may be used. Any polymer that provides a biocompatible surface useful in a joint replacement may be used in an implant. A polymer on a surface may create a slippery, a soft, and/or a smooth surface. A polymer may be a lubricious polymer. In one example, an implant polymer is a gradient polymer alloy as described herein.
One aspect of the invention involves methods for inserting an orthopedic implant into a joint.
A shape of an implant may be changed for any reason. A change in shape may provide an implant with a smaller size to aid in implant insertion (e.g. for arthroscopic or minimally invasive surgery). A change in shape or size may allow an implant to fit into a joint region. For example, a shape may be changed to allow an implant to fit over a femoral head. A shape of an implant may be changed so that the implant conforms to at least a portion of a shape of a joint. For example, a portion of a joint may have an irregular surface and an implant shape may be changed to abut or fit a shape of the surface.
In one aspect, a method of inserting an implant in a joint of a body may include inserting a polymer-metal implant into a joint space and changing a shape of the implant from a first shape to a second shape to conform to a shape of at least a portion of a bone forming the joint. The method may include returning the implant back to the first shape. The method may also include deforming the implant prior to the changing step from an original shape to a first shape. This may be useful, for example, to place the implant in the joint (e.g. through arthroscopic or minimally invasive surgery). For an implant configured to be placed on a femoral head of a hip joint, deforming may include expanding at least a portion of the implant to fit over the femoral head.
The various embodiments of the present invention are applicable to any joint in the body, including but not limited to the hand, feet, digits (of the hands and feet), ankle, intervertebral discs (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral), intervertebral facets, hip, knee, shoulder, and temporomandibular joint. The devices may be used with a, acromioclavicular joint, ankle joint, condyle, elbow joint, finger joint, glenoid, hip joint, intervertebral disc, intervertebral facet joint, labrum, meniscus, metacarpal joint, metatarsal joint, patella, tibial plateau, toe joint, temporomandibular joint, or wrist joint.
Any of the devices, features, materials, or methods described herein may be combined with any other devices, feature, material or method.
Any of the implants described herein may be configured to correct large or small cartilage defects.
Another aspect of the invention provides variations of IPNs and semi-IPNs. The basic embodiment is the combination of a polyurethane, a polyelectrolyte polymer, water, and salts. One embodiment comprises the combination of a polyether urethane, the sodium salt of poly(acrylic acid), water, as well as other salts. The ratios between these components vary depending on the composition of polyurethane, initial concentration of acrylic acid monomer, and both the amount and type of crosslinking agents used.
One factor is the durometer of the polyurethane used, which typically ranges from about 80 A to 75D but can also be softer or harder than these, respectively. The durometer is usually determined by the ratio of hard-to-soft segment species in the polyurethane. A typical hard segment species used is methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), and a typical soft segment species used is poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO). The ratio of MDI:PTMO in the polyurethane used can range from a predominance of soft segment constituents to a predominance of hard segment constituents. The exact ratio has a direct bearing on both the physical and mechanical properties of the polyurethane and its ability to be swollen by various monomers and/or solvents. In the present invention, a polyurethane with an intermediate durometer between 55 D and 75 D (i.e. 65D) yielded particularly excellent results in terms of equilibrium swelling of the material and mechanical properties. Other variations of polyurethane durometers can be used, such as 61 D, 63 D, or 67 D, which are expected to yield properties along the spectrum of those laid out by the 80 A, 55 D, 65 D, and 75 D polyurethanes described herein.
In the present invention, polyurethanes of varying durometers are swollen in a range of solution concentrations of acrylic acid monomers in water, along with a photoinitiator. A poly(acrylic acid) network is then formed by photo-initiated free radical polymerization and crosslinking of the acrylic acid monomers in the presence of the pre-existing polyurethane to form an interpenetrating polymer network of the two materials. The poly(acrylic acid) within the polyurethane is then neutralized in buffer solution to pH 7.4 and ionized and thus converted to sodium polyacrylate. Because this conversion takes place within the polyurethane matrix, the result is swelling of the IPN with additional water and salt (cations and anions) until a new equilibrium composition is reached between the polyurethane, sodium polyacrylate, water, and salts.
A second element of the present invention is the variation of the composition of this material across its thickness to form a gradient of hydration. This gradient is formed by controlling the amount of monomer that is allowed to penetrate the polyurethane matrix in a given plane prior to polymerization of the monomer to form the polyelectrolyte. The result is a material with differential swelling with water on one side versus the other. The ratio of polyurethane to polyelectrolyte varies as well, from one surface to the other, ranging from as high as 90% down to 0%.
The basic structure of this material mimics that seen in hyaline cartilage, where a tough structural matrix formed by organized collagen is interpenetrated by negatively charged proteoglycans that absorb water. Ions (namely sodium cations) play an important counterion role with the charged moieties on the proteoglycan molecules. It is the interplay between the proteoglycans, ions, water, and the surrounding collagen matrix that gives hyaline cartilage its unique load-bearing and low-friction properties. The present invention is a material that mimics the interplay between these key compositional structures, providing a structural matrix comprising polyurethane (which contains both ordered and amorphous domains), negatively charged sodium polyacrylate, ions, and water. As is described herein, variations on this combination of a polyurethane and polyelectrolyte can differ in terms of the type of polyurethane (e.g. polyether urethane, polycarbonate urethane, polyurethane urea, or a silicone-based derivative of these), polyelectrolyte (e.g. any homopolymer or copolymer system containing at least one of a carboxylic acid and/or a sulfonic acid functional group), as well as crosslinking agent or initiator (e.g. light-activated, chemical, or thermal). For the purposes of this disclosure, a polyelectrolyte is defined as a polymer or polymer network that bears a net negative charge. The polyelectrolyte network may have neutral (uncharged or ionizable) monomers and/or even positively charged monomers copolymerized with the charged or ionizable monomers, effectively forming a co-polymer network. For instance, acrylic acid, acrylamido methyl propane sulfonic acid, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, and acrylamide can be copolymerized in various ratios relative to each other and still yield a polymer network with a net negative charge. The concentrations or identities of any of these elements can vary without deviating from the essence of this invention. For example, any of the monomers or combinations of monomers listed in U.S. 2008/0269370, U.S. 2009/0088846 A1, and/or herein can be used (e.g. dimethylacrylamide, acrylamide, NIPAAm, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl acrylate/methacrylate, and any vinyl-based monomer containing sulfonic acid groups (e.g. acrylamido methyl propane sulfonic acid, vinyl sulfonic acid, 3-sulfopropyl acrylate (or methacrylate), 2-methyl-2-propene-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt, or any monomers in which sulfonic acid is conjugated (allyl ethers, acrylate/methacrylates, vinyl groups, or acrylamides). The monomer can also include any monomers containing carboxylic acid groups conjugated to allyl ethers, acrylate/methacrylates, vinyl groups, or acrylamides. In addition, the monomers can be used in combination, such as both carboxyl acid and sulfonic acid containing monomers, to create a carboxylate/sulfonate copolymer. The pendant functional groups on polymers resulting from these monomers and monomer combinations can be subject to subsequent chemical reactions to yield other functionalities to the final polymer. Other ionizable monomers include ones that contain negatively charged carboxylic acid or sulfonic acid groups, such as methacrylic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid, sulfopropyl methacrylate (or acrylate), vinyl sulfonic acid, or vinyl-conjugated versions of hyaluronic acid, heparin sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate, as well as derivatives, or combinations thereof.
Sulfonic acid functional groups may be incorporated into an already formed IPN or semi-IPN (including a gradient IPN or semi-IPN). The general principle is to replace the carboxylic acid groups present on a poly(acrylic acid) in an IPN with sulfonic acid-containing functional groups. This is an alternative way to bring sulfonic acid into an IPN, whereas a more direct way is to polymerize or co-polymerize sulfonic acid-containing monomers in a 2nd network formation step. The end result is the same (an IPN with a hydrophobic (e.g. polyurethane) first network and a copolymer containing of carboxylic acid groups and sulfonic acid groups in the second network). This may have advantages in some cases of possibly increasing the yield (percentage) of sulfonic acid in the second network, and could also make possible the formation of a gradient of sulfonation within the second network.
Any process may be used to incorporate sulfonic acid groups into a second network. One process to incorporate sulfonic acid groups into the second network of a polyurethane/poly(acrylic acid) IPN is as follows. To 200 mL 5 mM 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) solution is added a 1 g slab of an IPN of polyurethane and poly(acrylic acid) and the pH of the solution is titrated to 5.5. After soaking for an hour, 1 g of taurine (aminoethanesulfonic acid) is added into the solution and incubated at 37 degrees C. for 6 hours. After the reaction, the IPN is washed repeatedly to remove the catalyst and residual taurine. Other water-soluble carbodiimides can be used as the catalyst in this reaction instead of EDC, for example, 1-cyclohexyl-3-[2-morpholinoethyl]carbodiimide. Also, other sulfonic acid containing chemicals can be used to attain sulfonic acid functionality on the second network, including ones that result in the formation of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid. The final amount of sulfonic acid addition to the 2nd network can be varied through the time, temperature, molar ratio of reactants, and concentration and identity of catalyst, to attain anywhere from a very small percentage (e.g. 0.01% sulfonation) of the second network to a very high percentage (50% or greater). Examples of IPNs produced using this process include a semi-IPN of polyurethane/poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamido ethane sulfonic acid) as well as polyurethane/poly(acrylic acid-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid). IPNs, gradient IPNs, and semi-IPNs containing sulfonic acid-containing second networks may also be created using the above process.
The solution (e.g. aqueous buffer) in which these materials are immersed and swollen may also differ without deviating from the essence of this invention.
In other embodiments, the sulfonic acid functional groups may be present either alone or in combination with the carboxylic acid groups, and take on a negatively charged (ionized) state. The ionizable network takes on a fixed (negative) charge (838) and swells (compare 836 with 826) through the attraction of positive counterions (namely sodium) and water, as well as other ions that follow the water. When these two network elements are combined in an interpenetrating polymer network arrangement (
In terms of friction (coefficient of friction (COF)), the hydrated IPN or semi-IPN overlaps with the range of values that have been published in the literature for natural hyaline cartilage. In contrast, the COF values of UHMWPE are higher, and those of polyurethanes alone are even higher, and neither overlap with the ranges known for cartilage.
In terms of stiffness (modulus), the hydrated IPN or semi-IPN can be synthesized to attain a wide range of values that overlap with the values that have been elucidated for natural hyaline cartilage (“cartilage”) as well as those of the meniscus. In contrast, the stiffness of UHMWPE falls well above the range values known for either hyaline cartilage or meniscus. The stiffness of conventional homopolymer hydrogels (“GELS”) are known to overlap to some degree with that of hyaline cartilage, but are limited in their upper range and generally speaking are not able to attain the stiffness values of the meniscus.
In terms of water (H2O) content, the hydrated IPN or semi-IPN is able to obtain wide range of values that overlap with hyaline cartilage but also can attain higher and lower values as well. In contrast UHMWPE absorbs little to no water.
In terms of permeability (hydraulic permeability), the hydrated IPN or semi-IPN can achieve values that overlap with both the meniscus and hyaline cartilage. Generally speaking, the permeability of hyaline cartilage is lower the healthier the tissue is, and vice versa. Therefore, the hydrated IPN and semi-IPN is able to capture the permeability values of hyaline cartilage in its “healthy” spectrum.
In terms of tear strength, the hydrated IPN or semi-IPN can attain values that overlap or exceed the values known for that of hyaline cartilage. This is in contrast to most homopolymer hydrogel networks, which tend to have tear strength values below those known for hyaline cartilage.
In terms of failure strain (failure tensile strain), the hydrated IPN or semi-IPN according to the present invention is able to attain values that exceed those of either hyaline cartilage or most homopolymer hydrogel networks. This may be a consequence of the intrinsic extensibility of the first network material used, which is able to retain its capacity to be strained in spite of being swollen with water.
Other modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/579,375 filed Sep. 23, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/394,297 filed Dec. 29, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,457,803, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/347,647 filed Jan. 10, 2012, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/219,348 filed Aug. 26, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,883,915, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/377,844, filed Aug. 27, 2010 and of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/383,705, filed Sep. 16, 2010. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/219,348 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/499,041, filed Jul. 7, 2009, now abandoned, which claims the benefit U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/078,741, filed Jul. 7, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/079,060, filed Jul. 8, 2008, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/095,273, filed Sep. 8, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/166,194, filed Apr. 2, 2009. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/347,647 also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/431,327, filed Jan. 10, 2011, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/454,957, filed Mar. 21, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/566,567, filed Dec. 2, 2011; the disclosures of each of these prior applications is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3030327 | Hosch | Apr 1962 | A |
| 3053251 | Black et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3702611 | Fishbein | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3826678 | Hoffman et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3833404 | Sperling et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3939049 | Ratner et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 4035848 | Wagner | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4128600 | Skinner et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4192827 | Mueller et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4224699 | Weber | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4302553 | Frisch et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4312079 | Dorre et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4320709 | Hladun | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4391797 | Folkman et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4423099 | Mueller et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4439583 | Gould et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4452925 | Kuzma et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4468499 | Siegfried et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4477604 | Oechsle, III | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4487865 | Balazs et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4500676 | Balazs et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4536554 | Lim et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4575539 | DeCrosta et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4621637 | Fishbein | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4657941 | Blackwell et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4678468 | Hiroyoshi | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4680336 | Larsen et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4693715 | Abel, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4693721 | Ducheyne | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4816495 | Blackwell et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4836884 | McAuslan | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4846841 | Oh | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4865601 | Caldwell et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4913144 | Del Medico | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4931287 | Bae et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4966934 | Huang et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4973493 | Guire | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4978352 | Fedorov et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5030230 | White | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5061270 | Aboczky | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5067961 | Kelman et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5087392 | Burke et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5091205 | Fan | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5094876 | Goldberg et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100689 | Goldberg et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5112350 | Civerchia et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5115056 | Mueller et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5122133 | Evans | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5133769 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5171318 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5258024 | Chavel et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264495 | Irie et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5276070 | Arroyo | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282851 | Jacob-LaBarre | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290548 | Goldberg et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300116 | Chirila et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5314478 | Oka et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5374515 | Parenteau et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5403893 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5476515 | Kelman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5554665 | Tateosian et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556429 | Felt | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5562738 | Boyd et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5576072 | Hostettler et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587406 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589563 | Ward et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591170 | Spievack et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5643390 | Don et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5644049 | Giusti et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645592 | Nicolais et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5656210 | Hill et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5660692 | Nesburn et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5674942 | Hill et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5693034 | Buscemi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5716633 | Civerchia | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5733289 | Seedhom et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5763529 | Lucas | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770669 | Robertson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5800412 | Zhang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824079 | Siegler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5834532 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836313 | Perez et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837752 | Shastri et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5856366 | Shiveley et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5904927 | Amiji | May 1999 | A |
| 5913858 | Calandruccio et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5962005 | Saga et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976648 | Li et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001894 | Ottersbach et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005160 | Hsiue et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6019766 | Ling et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027742 | Lee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030606 | Holmes | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031017 | Waki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6057406 | Pojman et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171300 | Adams | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6210438 | Sheets, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214044 | Silverstrini | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221467 | Nazarova et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224893 | Langer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231605 | Ku | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231611 | Mosseri | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239209 | Yang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6251965 | Wang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254637 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264695 | Stoy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265016 | Hostettler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6281271 | Rumphorst et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6306177 | Felt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6331578 | Turner et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6368315 | Gillis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372815 | Sulc et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6376742 | Zdrahala et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391055 | Ikada et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6428576 | Haldimann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6429256 | Vandevoorde et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437018 | Gertzman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440444 | Boyce et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6479565 | Stanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482209 | Engh et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6494917 | McKellop et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6509098 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6585771 | Buttermilch et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6610067 | Tallarida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6629997 | Mansmann | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6632235 | Weikel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6632246 | Simon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6645715 | Griffith et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652587 | Felt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6673079 | Kane | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6673112 | Nigam | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6689165 | Jacob et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6726322 | Andino et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6733533 | Lozier | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6740087 | Knox | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6755865 | Tarabishy | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6759449 | Kimura et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6846875 | Pennings et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6852125 | Simon et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6866936 | Opolski | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6911212 | Gertzman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6918914 | Bauer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6921264 | Mayer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6949251 | Dalal et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| RE38839 | Magnante | Oct 2005 | E |
| 6953594 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6955540 | Mayer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6960617 | Omidian et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6976997 | Noolandi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7008226 | Mayer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7008635 | Coury et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7018460 | Xu et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7019192 | Gertzman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7029479 | Tallarida et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037984 | Lendlein et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7049351 | Phelan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7066958 | Ferree | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7067194 | Mao et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7083650 | Moskowitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7094286 | Liu | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7105026 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7160305 | Schmieding | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163541 | Ek | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7176247 | Walker, Jr. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7204897 | Stoy et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7217294 | Kusanagi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7220491 | Rouns et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7235592 | Muratoglu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7279174 | Pacetti et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7279507 | Hu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7303814 | Lamberti et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7335205 | Aeschlimann et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7341593 | Auxepaules et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7371257 | Sahatjian et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7387810 | Hossainy | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7468075 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7476398 | Doillon et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7563483 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7618462 | Ek | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7678151 | Ek | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7713305 | Ek | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7824666 | Wolff et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8252851 | Young et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8497023 | Myung et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8679190 | Myung et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8853294 | Myung et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8883915 | Myung et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9114024 | Kourtis et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9387082 | Myung et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9750842 | Kourtis et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 10457803 | Myung | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 20010029399 | Ku | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044026 | Vaghefi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020022884 | Mansmann | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055007 | Soane et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082699 | Ward et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091229 | Hubbell et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173855 | Mansmann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198280 | Baba et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030008396 | Ku | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030022216 | Mao et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028196 | Bonutti | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083389 | Kao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083433 | James et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030092777 | Leitner | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100666 | DeGroot et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114936 | Sherwood et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130741 | McMinn | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153981 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170308 | Cleary et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040028804 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034437 | Schmieding | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044410 | Ferree et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059425 | Schmieding | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116564 | Devlin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133275 | Mansmann | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040134502 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138382 | Dous | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139382 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147466 | Barman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147927 | Tsougarakis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153040 | Martineau et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153079 | Tsougarakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153163 | Posner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167528 | Schantz | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171740 | Ruberti et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199250 | Fell | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204760 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040214914 | Marmo | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230315 | Ek | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236424 | Berez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266941 | Houston et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267363 | Fell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004306 | Lubnin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050013793 | Beckman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027364 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033295 | Wisnewski | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038520 | Binette et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049459 | Hern | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055044 | Kangas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065616 | Ankorina-Stark et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090612 | Soane et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113836 | Lozier et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113928 | Cragg et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126680 | Aeschlimann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050142162 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147685 | Osada et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171604 | Michalow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050186248 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187146 | Helmus et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215660 | Tomikawa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050218541 | Peng et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228161 | Benz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251267 | Winterbottom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251268 | Truncale | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267482 | Hyde | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267584 | Burdulis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278025 | Ku et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283255 | Geremakis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287187 | Mansmann | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008506 | Cipriano De Sousa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052878 | Schmieding | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083773 | Myung et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093648 | Coury et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105295 | Mayer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111726 | Felt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122543 | Mayer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060134186 | Carlton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142406 | Schmitt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148985 | Karthauser | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188487 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188940 | Cima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193899 | Sawhney | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224244 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233855 | Seliktar et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235517 | Hodorek | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235539 | Blunn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235542 | Hodorek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240478 | Nishimi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241629 | Krebs et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241759 | Trieu | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246241 | Kruger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282169 | Felt et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287721 | Myung et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287730 | Segal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070014828 | Fitzhugh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016211 | Botimer | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048382 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067032 | Felt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070068816 | Solomon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078388 | Kangas | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078518 | Lavi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083266 | Lang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087031 | Ashman et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088444 | Hodorek et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098675 | Elisseeff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099840 | Ulijn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100457 | Hyde | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118218 | Hooper | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070126982 | Myung et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070134291 | Ting et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135922 | Trieu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070141108 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142914 | Jones et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070149441 | Aeschlimann et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167541 | Ruberti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179605 | Myung et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179607 | Hodorek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179622 | Denoziere et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191963 | Winterbottom et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198022 | Lang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202148 | Ringeisen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219640 | Steinberg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070224238 | Mansmann et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225823 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233240 | Frank et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233269 | Steines et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265704 | Mayer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270783 | Zumsteg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276394 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080058954 | Trieu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070086 | Fukuchi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077249 | Gradel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103505 | Fransen | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124376 | Pruitt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139694 | Ratcliffe | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182919 | Saimi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241214 | Myung et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269370 | Myung et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317818 | Griffith et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090035344 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062408 | Liu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062423 | Betz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088846 | Myung et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142508 | Lai et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163860 | Patrick et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090176891 | Chogle et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209966 | Chandler | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221730 | Kowalski et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090233887 | Shalaby et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234044 | Rheinberger et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240337 | Myung et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281545 | Stubbs | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090312807 | Boudreault et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010114 | Myung et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100032090 | Myung et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100056646 | Shalaby et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125341 | Frauens | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20110152868 | Kourtis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184423 | Rushton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237705 | Leonard et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120045651 | Myung et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120116531 | Forsell | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209396 | Myung et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232657 | Myung et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277807 | Myung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120308508 | Saunders et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130096691 | Myung et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130103157 | Kourtis et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131741 | Kourtis et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138210 | Myung et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138211 | Myung et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130217829 | Myung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140172098 | Myung et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20150025161 | Myung et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272599 | Kourtis et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150284654 | Myung et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160346089 | Myung et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170107370 | Myung et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170327624 | Kourtis et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170348011 | Kourtis et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20190218386 | Kourtis et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190224367 | Kourtis et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20200023098 | Kourtis et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200046880 | Kourtis et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0650707 | May 1995 | EP |
| 1779875 | May 2007 | EP |
| 2268331 | Jan 2011 | EP |
| 2626090 | Aug 2013 | EP |
| 2372707 | Sep 2002 | GB |
| H06-287443 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| H09-077809 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| H10-500038 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 3176176 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2002514233 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002518564 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002518565 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2003171475 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2004512079 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2004515311 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2005305162 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006517842 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2007501674 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| WO-9401468 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| WO-9530388 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO-9806768 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO-9945978 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO-9967311 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO-9967312 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO-0002937 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO-00043050 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-02026848 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO-03009337 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004032767 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004055057 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004073563 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004091685 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2007067697 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007068625 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007112305 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008100617 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009071937 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010037685 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010059495 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2012096997 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO-2015023569 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Balamurugan et al.; Development and spectral characterization of poly(methyl methacrylate)/hydroxyapatite composite for biomedical applications; Trenads Biomater. Artif. Organs; 18(1); pp. 41-45; Jul. 2004. |
| Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela M.; Quantitative determination of degree of conversion in photocured poly (urethane-dimethacrylate)s by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Journal of Applied Polymer Science; vol. 123; issue 3; pp. 1604-1611; Feb. 5, 2012. |
| Bobyn et al., The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res, Jul./Aug. 1980(150): p. 263-70. |
| Borden et al.; The sintered microsphere matrix for bone tissue engineering: In vitroosteoconductivity studies; J. Biomed. Mat. Res.; 61(3); pp. 421-429; Sep. 2002. |
| Brodbeck et al., Biomaterial adherent macrophage apoptosis is increased by hydrophilic and anionic substrates in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Aug. 6, 2002. 99(16): p. 10287-92. |
| Brown et al.; Solvent/Non-solvent sintering: A novel route to create porous microsphere scaffolds for tissue regeneration; J. Biomed. Mat. Res. (Part B: Applied Biomaterials); 86B(2); pp. 396-406; Aug. 2008. |
| Causton et al.; Dental materials: 1981 literature review Part 1; Journal of Dentistry; vol. 12; Issue 1; pp. 1R28; Mar. 1984. |
| Charnley, J.; Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur; J Bone Joint Surg Br.; 42-B:28-30; Feb. 1960. |
| Chen et al.; Mechanical Properties of Polyepichlorohydrin Polyurethane/Poly(methyl methacrylate) IPNs; Chinese J Appl Chem; 12(4):66-69; Aug. 1995 (wEngAbs). |
| Christenson et al., “Antioxidant inhibition of poly(carbonate urethane) in vivo biodegradation,” J Biomed Mater Res A. 76(3): 480-490 (2006). |
| Covert et al.; Friction characteristics of a potential articular cartilage biomaterial. Wear, Aug. 2003. 255: p. 1064-1068. |
| Depuy Orthopaedics; Bone Cement Time Setting Chart; product file; date of publication unknown; available to applicants at least as of Jul. 2012. |
| Dror et al.; Gradient interpenetrating polymer networks. I. Poly(ether urethane) and polyacrylamide IPN; J of Applied Polymer Science; 26; pp. 1741-1757; Jun. 1981. |
| Elbert; Liquid-liquid two phase systems for the production of porous hydrogels and hydrogel microsphers for biomedical applications: A tutorial review; Acta Biomater; 7(1); pp. 31-56; Jan. 31, 2011. |
| Elmer's Products Inc.; Material Safety Data Sheet; “Elmer's Nano Glue”; Jun. 13, 2007. |
| Elsabee et al.; Gradient interpenetrating polymer networks. II. Polyacrylamide gradients in poly(ether urethane); J of Applied Polymer Science; 28(7); pp. 2151-2166; Jun. 1983. |
| Esstech, Inc.; Urethane Dimethacrylate (product specification); 1 pg.; Note: this document was available to applicant(s) at least as of (Apr. 8, 2015). |
| Evans et al.; The use of corneal organ culture in biocompatibility studies; Biomaterials; vol. 23; pp. 1359-1367; Mar. 2002. |
| Forsell; U.S. Appl. No. 61/229,735 entitled “Hip Joint Method,” filed Jul. 30, 2009. |
| Frank, Curt; Structure-property relationships for hydrogels with applications to biomedical devices; Presentation at American Chemical Society Mtg; San Francisco, CA; Sep. 11, 2006. |
| Gao et al.; Grafting of hydrophilic monomers onto polyurethane membranes by solution or pre-absorbing methods for acceleration of cell compatibility; Chinese Journal of Polymer Science; vol. 19; No. 5; pp. 493-498; Oct. 20, 2001. |
| Gong et al.; Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength; Adv. Mater.; vol. 15; No. 14; pp. 1155-1158; Jul. 17, 2003. |
| Gorna et al., “Biodegradable porous polyurethane scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration,” J Biomed Mater Res A. 79(1):128-38 (2006). |
| Gorna et al.; Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes; J Biomed Mater Res A. 67(3): 813-827 (2003). |
| Goswami et al.; Engineering properties of novolac resin-PMMA {Poly(methyl methacrylate)} IPN system; Journal of Applied Science; 93(6); pp. 2764-2774; Jul. 16, 2004. |
| Guelcher et al.; Synthesis and in vitro biocompatibility of injectable polyurethane foam scaffolds; Tissue Engineering; 12(5); pp. 1247-1259; May 2006. |
| Guelcher et al.; Synthesis of biocompatible segmented polyurethanes from aliphatic diisocyanates and diurea diol chain extenders; Acta biomaterialia; 1(4); pp. 471-484; Jul. 2005. |
| Gunatillake et al.; Designing biostable polyurethane elastomers for biomedical implants; Aust. J. Chem.; vol. 56; pp. 545-557; Jun. 2003. |
| Hern et al.; Incorporation of adhesion peptides into nonadhesive hydrogels useful for tissue resurfacing; J. Biomed. Materials Research; vol. 39; No. 1; pp. 266-276; Feb. 1998. |
| Hsieh et al.; Compatibility and Morphology in Polyurethane and Polystyrene Ionomeric Interpenetrating Polymer Networks; Polymer Journal; 21(1); pp. 1-10; Jan. 15, 1989. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US08/01642, dated May 16, 2008 (1 page). |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US16/46350, dated Oct. 14, 2016 (3 pages). |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US19/42193, dated Sep. 27, 2019 (3 pages). |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/004976, dated Oct. 15, 2009 (4 pages). |
| Ithaca College Gross Anatomy; Joints of the Back; ; 4 pgs. (downloaded Dec. 1, 2013 from http://www.ithaca.edu/faculty/lahr/LE2000/Back/Jointpage.htm). |
| Iwasaki et al., Hydrogel like elastic membrane consisting of semi-interpenetrating polymer networks based on a phosphorylcholine polymer and a segmented polyurethane; J. Polym. Sci Part A: Polym Chem; 41; pp. 68-75; Jan. 2003. |
| Jones et al.; Sequential Polyurethane-Poly(Methylmethacrylate) Interpenetrating Polymer Networks as Ureteral Biomaterials: Mechanical Properties and Comparative Resistance to Urinaryencrustation; J Mater Sci Mater Med; 8(11):713-717; Nov. 1997. |
| Kagata et al., “Friction of Gels. 6. Effects of Sliding Velocity and Viscoelastic Responses of the Network,” J Phys Chem B. 106(18):4596-601 (2002). |
| Kaneko et al., “Mechanically Strong Hydrogels with Ultra-Low Frictional Coefficients,” Advanced Materials. 17(5):535-8 (2005). |
| Kanie et al.; Flexural properties of ethyl or methyl methacrylate-UDMA blend polymers; Dent Mater J; 29(5); pp. 575-581; Oct. 2010. |
| Khan et al., Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part I: materials selection and evaluation. Biomaterials, Feb. 2005. 26(6): p. 621-31. |
| Kim et al.; Adhesion and growth of endothelial cell on amphiphilic PU/PS IPN surface: effect of amphiphilic balance and immobilized collagen; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; 62(4); pp. 613-621; Sep. 6, 2002. |
| Kim et al.; Electrical/pH Responsive Properties of Poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid)/Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels; Journal of Applied Polymer Science; vol. 92; issue 3; pp. 1731-1736; May 2004. |
| Kim et al.; Electrochemical behavior of an interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel composed of poly (propylene glycol) and poly(acrylic acid); Journal of Applied Polymer Science; vol. 89; pp. 2301-2305; Aug. 2003. |
| Kim et al.; Water sorption of ploy(propylene glycol)/poly(acrylic acid) interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels; Reactive & Functional Polymers; vol. 55; pp. 69-73; Feb. 2003. |
| Kourtis et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/573,788, entitled “Polymeric adhesive for anchoring compliant materials to another surface,” filed Oct. 3, 2012 (103 pages). |
| Kourtis et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,731, entitled “Systems, Devices, and Methods for Anchoring Orthopaedic Implants to Bone,” filed Nov. 21, 2012 (130 pages). |
| Kourtis et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/831,746 entitled “Systems, devices, and methods for anchoring orthopaedic implants to bone,” filed Aug. 20, 2015. |
| Kourtis et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,413, entitled “Method, device, and system for shaving and shaping of a joint,” filed Feb. 24, 2017 (69 pages). |
| Kourtis et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/668,547, entitled “Polymeric adhesive for achoring compliant materials to another surface,” filed Aug. 3, 2017 (109 pages). |
| Kourtis et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/752,168, entitled “Interpenetrating polymer networks,” filed Feb. 12, 2018 (109 pages). |
| Kourtis et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,829, entitled “Method, device, and system for shaving and shaping of a joint,” filed Dec. 20, 2010 (69 pages). |
| Kwong et al.; A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum; J Bone Joint Surg Br.; 88(1):120-2; Jan. 2006. |
| Lam et al.; Update on Ureteral Stents; Urology; 64:9-15; Jul. 2004. |
| Lamba et al.; Polyurethanes in Biomedical Application; CRC Press; pp. 11, 14, 16, 18-20, 57-59, 73, 79 & 104; Nov. 1997. |
| Lee et al.; Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels based on poly (ethylene glycol) macromer and chitosan; Carbohydrate Polymer; vol. 41; No. 2; pp. 197-205; Feb. 2000. |
| Lewis G.; Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review; J Biomed Mater Res.; 38(2):155-82; Summer Jun.-Aug. 1997. |
| Lipatov et al.; Gradient interpenetrating polymer networks; Journal of Materials Science; 30(4); pp. 1095-1104; Feb. 1995. |
| Lu et al.; Release behavior of high molecular weight solutes from poly(ethylene glycol)-based degradable networks; Macromolecules; vol. 33(7); pp. 2509-2515; Mar. 2000. |
| Maroudas et al.; Permeability of articular cartilage; Nature; vol. 219(5160); pp. 1260-1261; Sep. 21, 1968. |
| Matinlinna et al., “Isocyanato- and Methacryloxysilanes Promote Bis-GMA Adhesion to Titanium,” J Dent Res. 84(4):360-364 (2005). |
| MIT.edu; Material Modulus Properties; 2pgs.; Feb. 8, 2007 (downloaded Nov. 27, 2013 from http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://web.mit.edu/course/3/3.11/www/modules-/props.pdf). |
| Morgan et al.; Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site; J Biomech.; 34(5):569-77; May 2001. |
| Mow et al., Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Mechano-Biology, Lippincot Williams and Wilkins, 3rd Edition, Apr. 2005, pp. 459-461. |
| Myung et al.; Biomimetic strain hardening in interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels; Polymer,; vol. 48; No. 18; pp. 5376-5387; Jun. 2007. |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,359, entitled “Methods, devices and compositions for adhering hydrated polymer implants to bone,” filed Mar. 23, 2009 (45 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,041, entitled “Hydrophilic Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Derived From Hydrophobic Polymers,” filed Jul. 7, 2009 (95 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/536,233, entitled “Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels,” filed Aug. 5, 2009 (51 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/347,647, entitled “Orthopedic implants having gradient polymer alloys,” filed Jan. 10, 2012 (144 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/418,294, entitled “Hydrogel Anthroplasty Device,” filed Mar. 12, 2012 (99 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/542,464, entitled “Methods, Devices and Compositions for Adhering Hydrated Polymer Implants to Bone,” filed Jul. 5, 2012 (48 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,573, entitled “Hydrophilic Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Derived From Hydrophobic Polymers,” filed Jan. 23, 2013 (99 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,576, entitled “Hydrophilic Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Derived From Hydrophobic Polymers,” filed Jan. 23, 2013 (103 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/816,537, entitled “Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Derived From Hydrophobic Polymers and Methods of Preparing the Same,” filed Apr. 24, 2013 (153 pages). |
| Myung et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,028, entitled “Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels,” filed May 29, 2013 (58 pages). |
| Myung, David; Structure, properties, and medical device applications of mechanically enhanced, biometric hydrogel alloys; Doctoral Thesis; Stanford University; Dec. 2007. |
| Nanci et al., “Chemical modification of titanium surfaces for covalent attachment of biological molecules,” J Biomed Mater Res. 40(2):324-35 (1998) (13 pages). |
| Neurosurgical.com; Spinal Anatomy: The Regions of the Spine; 5pgs. (downloaded Dec. 1, 2013 http://www.neurosurgical.com/neuro_medical_info/spinal_anatomy.htm). |
| Ohman et al.; Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements; J Biomech.; 40(11):2426-33; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreignpriority date) 2007. |
| Orr et al.; Shrinkage stresses in bone cement; Biomaterials; 24(17):2933-40; Aug. 2003. |
| Pan et al., “A study on the friction properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as articular cartiliage against titanium alloy,” Wear. 262(7-8):1021-5 (2007). |
| Park et al.; Synthesis of PVA/PVP hydrogels having two-layer by radiation and their physical properties; Radiation Physics and Chemistry; 67(3-4); pp. 361-365; Jun. 2003. |
| Puska et al.; Exothermal Characteristics and Release of Residual Monomers from Fiber-reinforced Oligomer-modified Acrylic Bone Cement; J Biomat App; 20:51-64; Jul. 2005. |
| Realdictionary; Definition of Implant; 4pgs. (downloaded Dec. 1, 2013 from www.realdictionary.com/?q=implant). |
| Revzin et al., “Fabrication of Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogel Microstructures Using Photolithography,” Langmuir. 17(18):5440-7 (2001). |
| Saito et al.; Preparation and properties of transparent cellulose hydrogels; J. Applied Polymer Science; 90(11); pp. 3020-3025; Dec. 2003. |
| Scholes et al.; Compliant layer acetabular cups: friction tsting of a range of materials and designs for a new generation of prosthesis that mimics the natural joint; Proc. IMechE; vol. 220(5); Part H; J. Engineering in Medicine; pp. 583-596, Jul. 2006. |
| Shalaby; U.S. Appl. No. 61/069,046 entitled “Hydroswellable, segmented, aliphatic polyurethanes and polyurethane ureas,” filed Mar. 12, 2008. |
| Sigma-Aldrich; Methyl Methacrylate (product specification); 1 pg.; Note: this document was available to applicant(s) at least as of (Jun. 19, 2014). |
| Simon et al., “Study of two Grafting Methods for Obtaining a 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane Monolayer on Silica Surface,” J Colloid Interface Sci. 251(2):278-83 (2002). |
| Spector et al.; Porous polymers for biological fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res, Oct. 1988 (235): p. 207-19. |
| Stammen et al., Mechanical properties of a novel PVA hydrogel in shear and unconfined compression. Biomaterials, Apr. 2001. 22(8): p. 799-806. |
| Stryker Orthopaedics; SimplexTM P Bone Cement; Product Literature LSB Rev. 3, Mar. 2006. |
| Swieszkowski et al., “An elastic material for cartilage replacement in an arthritic shoulder joint,” Biomaterials. 27(8):1534-41 (2006). |
| Tanaka et al.; Polymer properties on resins composed of UDMA and methacrylates with the carboxyl group; Dental Materials Journal; 20(3); pp. 206-215; Sep. 2001. |
| Tariq et al.; (Abstract) Sodium benzoate attenuates iminodipropionitrile-induced behavioral syndrome in rats. Behav pharmacol; Dec. 2004. |
| Tawfik, Dan; Amidation of carboxyl groups; The Protein Protocols Handbook, 2nd Ed.; Humana Press; pp. 477-478; Feb. 2002. |
| The Engineering Toolbox; Polyurethane insulation: {http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/polyurethane-insulation-k-values-d_117-4.html} pp. 1-3; printed Oct. 21, 2011. |
| The Engineering Toolbox;Thermal conductivity of some common materials and gases: {http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thrmal-conductivity-d_429.html} pp. 1-2; printed Oct. 21, 2011. |
| The Gorilla Glue Company; Material Safety Data Sheet; “New Fast Cure-Dries White Gorilla Glue.RTM.”; Jan. 30, 2007. |
| The Gorilla Glue Company; Material Safety Data Sheet; “New Stronger-Faster Gorilla Glue.RTM.”; Jan. 26, 2007. |
| Van Landuyt et al.; Reinforcement of Osteosynthesis Screws with Brushite Cement; Bone; 25(2)(Suppl 1):95S-98S; Aug. 1999. |
| Wittemann et al.; Adsorption of proteins on spherical polyelectrolyte brushes in aqueous solution; Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., Mar. 2003, vol. 5(8), pp. 1671-1677. |
| Wright et al., Wear studies on prosthetic materials using the pin-on-disc machine. Biomaterials, vol. 3, Issue 1, Jan. 1982, pp. 41R48. |
| Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US08/01642, dated May 16, 2008 (5 pages). |
| Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US16/46350, dated Oct. 14, 2016 (8 pages). |
| Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US19/42193, dated Sep. 27, 2019 (6 pages). |
| Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/004976, dated Oct. 15, 2009 (6 pages). |
| Xiao et al., “Covalent Attachment of Cell-Adhesive, (Arg-Gly-Asp)-Containing Peptides to Titanium Surfaces,” Langmuir.14(19):5507-16 (1998). |
| Yang et al.; Preparation of poly(acrylic acid) modified polyurethane membrane for biomaterial by UV radiation without degassing; J. Biomed. Mater. Res.; vol. 45(2); pp. 133-139; May 1999. |
| Yim et al., Biocompatibility of poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(acrylic acid)interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel particles inRAW 264.7 macrophage and MG-63 osteoblast cell lines. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 91A(3); pp. 894-902; Dec. 1, 2009. |
| Zhu et al.; (Abstract) Promoting the cytocompatibility of polyurethane scaffolds via surface photo-grafting polymerization of acrylamide; J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.; vol. 15; No. 3; pp. 283-289; Mar. 2004. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200239678 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61566567 | Dec 2011 | US | |
| 61383705 | Sep 2010 | US | |
| 61377844 | Aug 2010 | US | |
| 61166194 | Apr 2009 | US | |
| 61095273 | Sep 2008 | US | |
| 61079060 | Jul 2008 | US | |
| 61078741 | Jul 2008 | US | |
| 61454957 | Mar 2011 | US | |
| 61431327 | Jan 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16579375 | Sep 2019 | US |
| Child | 16811997 | US | |
| Parent | 15394297 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Child | 16579375 | US | |
| Parent | 13347647 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Child | 15394297 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13219348 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Child | 13347647 | US | |
| Parent | 12499041 | Jul 2009 | US |
| Child | 13219348 | US |
