In a gait cycle, the foot optimally goes through pronation and supination. When either of these tri-plane motions is made in excess, the foot is subject to biomechanical maladies with these excess deviations from its neutral position. Additionally, the foot in stance is subject to ground force reaction which often is the cause of foot deformity. However, conventional orthotics fail to actively manage motion in the horizontal, vertical, and lateral planes of motion during gait or in stance and therefore do not efficiently adjust to ground forces, stabilize the foot, or assist in propulsion during propulsion.
In an embodiment, an orthotic is disclosed. The orthotic has a convex element that has a periphery. The convex element is positioned in a plane. The periphery is structured and arranged to deform into a gap in at least of a horizontal, a vertical, or a lateral direction relative to the plane. The convex element is structured and arranged for placement between a plantar surface of a foot and a second surface. The gap is defined by a top surface of the convex element and a bottom surface of the foot or a bottom surface of a body of an insert.
In another embodiment, an insert adapted to be used in footwear is disclosed. The insert has a body having a proximal end, a distal end, a top surface shaped to receive a plantar surface of a foot, a bottom surface, and a raised arch positioned on a medial side. A concave heel portion is formed in the top surface of the body at the proximal end of the body and is shaped to receive a heel of the foot. An orthotic having a convex element having a periphery is attached to the bottom surface of the body at the proximal end of the body substantially below the concave heel portion. There is a gap defined by the bottom surface of the body and a top surface of the convex element. The periphery of the convex element is structured and arranged to deform into the gap as a force is applied to the body and to rebound as the force dissipates. In an embodiment, the convex element has a parabolic proximal end and a cut-out at a distal end that forms medial and lateral members, wherein the medial and lateral members are structured and arranged to deform into the gap as the force is applied to the body and to rebound as the force dissipates.
In another embodiment, an insert adapted to be used in footwear is disclosed. The insert has a body having a proximal end, a distal end, a top surface shaped to receive a plantar surface of a foot, a bottom surface, and a raised arch positioned on a medial side. A concave heel portion formed in the top surface at the proximal end is shaped to receive a heel of the foot. An orthotic having a convex element having a periphery is attached to a bottom surface of the body at the distal end of the body proximal to the raised arch. A gap is defined by the bottom surface of the body and a top surface of the convex element. The periphery of the convex element is structured and arranged to deform into the gap as a force is applied to the body and to rebound as the force dissipates. In an embodiment, the convex element has a parabolic proximal end and a cut-out at a distal end that forms medial and lateral members, wherein the medial and lateral members are structured and arranged to deform into the gap as the force is applied to the body and to rebound as the force dissipates.
In another embodiment, an article of footwear is disclosed. The footwear has an upper having an opening that extends to an interior cavity that is structured and arranged to receive a foot. A sole structure is secured to the upper and is positioned below the opening. The sole structure has a proximal end, a distal end, a top surface positioned within the opening, and an opposite bottom surface. The footwear has an insert structured and arranged for positioning within the interior cavity. The insert has a body having a proximal end, a distal end, a top surface shaped to receive a plantar surface of the foot, a bottom surface structured and arranged to oppose the top surface of the sole structure, and a raised arch positioned on a medial side. There is a concave heel portion formed in the top surface of the body of the insert at the proximal end that is shaped to receive a heel of the foot. An orthotic having a convex element having a periphery is attached to the bottom surface of the body of the insert. A gap is defined by the bottom surface of the body and a top surface of the convex element. The periphery of the convex element is structured and arranged to deform into the gap as a force is applied to the body and to rebound as the force dissipates.
Other objects, features, aspects and advantages of the orthotic insert will become better understood or apparent from the following detailed description, drawings, and appended claims.
As shown generally in the figures, embodiments of an orthotic device 100 are disclosed. In certain embodiments, in use the orthotic 100 may be inserted into footwear 500 and worn between the plantar aspect of a foot and a top surface of a shoe or in-shoe appliance such as an insole, foot bed, or heel cup, referred to collectively herein as a removable insole or insert 200, described below. In certain embodiments, the orthotic 100 may directly contact the plantar surface of the foot in use. In certain embodiments, the orthotic 100 and the body of the insert may be unitary.
The orthotic 100 is configured to assist the musculoskeletal system in the responsive management of a triplane motion at the foot and ankle by repositioning the foot and providing motion control while dynamically absorbing shock. The deformable periphery of the orthotic provided graded adaptation to uneven surfaces and measured management of ground force reaction. The orthotic 100 is active at the stance phase, early in the gait cycle, and side to side motion, and rebounds to its original position later in the gait cycle, which stabilizes and propels the foot actively forward and provides for improved timing and foot mechanics compared to other orthotics.
As illustrated generally in the figures and particularly in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The orthotic 100 may be positioned anywhere along the body 220 of the insert 200. In an embodiment illustrated in
In another embodiment, the orthotic 100 may be adapted for use in footwear 500. An embodiment of an article of footwear 500 in combination with the orthotic 100 and an insert 200 is illustrated in
Illustrating the invention are the following examples that are not to be considered as limiting the invention to their details.
Twenty three (23) subjects were tested. Each subject was without acute or inhibiting symptoms or pathologies. Each subject received an appropriate size commercially available orthotic (designated herein as “L”) and an orthotic such as the one illustrated in
Testing was performed on Noraxon's FDM-T treadmill (force distribution measurement treadmill) for stance and gait analysis. The FDM-T treadmill controls speed and the walking surface and also measures temporal and special gait parameters, kinetics, pressure and ground reaction forces complete and segmented.
Each subject completed a questionnaire that included questions regarding medical history, preexisting conditions or symptoms, and level of comfort with walking on a treadmill. Each subject was positioned on the FDM-T treadmill, the treadmill was calibrated and started. For each subject, the following protocol was followed:
(1) Wearing walking shoe without any orthotic inserts (designated herein as “R”):
(2) Wearing walking shoes with an “L” orthotic insert made of either C or P:
(3) Wearing walking shoes with a “D” orthotic insert made of either C or P:
In each subject, data recorded with the D orthotic inserted into the shoes were compared to data recorded while the subject had the L orthotic inserted into the shoes. Data over subjects were averaged and are summarized below.
These results indicate that stability and lateral movement are controlled by the orthotic insert having the convex element (D) so that there is less variability of center of pressure in all directions. Energy is stored and returned more efficiently so that strides are longer, more neutral in position, and loading responses are faster. Finally, resupination is faster, and preparation for propulsion to the next contact is faster.
During lateral stepping, an average increase of about 8 frames (8 ms) in lateral shift or pronation from a lateral supinated landing during the side step was measured in the D insert compared to the L insert. These data indicate that there was an increase in time to recenter after the supinated transversal motion.
When subjects used the D insert compared to the L insert, the center of pressure of a subject stepping laterally covered a smaller distance, indicating that even in the transversal plane, the D insert manages lateral motion and corrects the foot's position more effectively.
Additionally, when subjects wore the D insert compared to the L insert, there was a decrease in path length of the center of pressure, indicating that there was a smaller change in center of pressure with the D insert.
Finally, the average velocity (mm/sec) increased by 5.73 mm/sec when the subjects wore the D insert compared to the L insert.
While the foregoing has been set forth in considerable detail, it is to be understood that the drawings and detailed embodiments are presented for elucidation and not limitation. Design variations, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangements of parts may be made but are within the principles described herein. Those skilled in the art will realize that such changes or modifications of the invention or combinations of elements, variations, equivalents or improvements therein are still within the scope of the orthotic insert as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/321,355, filed on Jan. 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1992853 | Barrett | Feb 1935 | A |
2096500 | McCahan et al. | Oct 1937 | A |
2207833 | Stark | Jul 1940 | A |
2311925 | Boos | Feb 1943 | A |
2401514 | Scholl | Jun 1946 | A |
2441891 | Lucey et al. | May 1948 | A |
2518033 | Lucas | Aug 1950 | A |
3859740 | Kemp | Jan 1975 | A |
4517981 | Santopietro et al. | May 1985 | A |
4686993 | Grumbine | Aug 1987 | A |
4760655 | Mauch | Aug 1988 | A |
4823420 | Bartneck | Apr 1989 | A |
4910884 | Lindh et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5881478 | McMahon et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6098319 | Epstein | Aug 2000 | A |
6247250 | Hauser | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6543158 | Dieckhaus | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6782643 | Brown | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6817115 | Polifroni | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7017218 | Nguyen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7334351 | Hann | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7913429 | Wert | Mar 2011 | B1 |
20020050080 | Vasyli | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120317838 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12321355 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13593989 | US |