This invention relates generally to refueling systems for vehicles and, more particularly, to assist-type vapor recovery systems for the refueling of vehicles that are compatible with vehicles having onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR).
In fuel dispensing systems, such as those used for delivering gasoline to the fuel tank of a vehicle, environmental protection laws require that vapors emitted from the tank during the fuel dispensing process be recovered. Fuel is customarily delivered through a nozzle via a fuel hose and vapors are recovered from the nozzle via a vapor hose that conveys the vapor to the storage tank from whence the fuel came. In what is referred to as a balanced system, the vapors are forced through the vapor hose by the positive pressure created in the vehicle tank as the fuel enters it. In other systems, referred to as assist-type systems, the vapor is pumped from the vehicle tank into the storage tank by a vapor recovery system connected to the vapor hose. Currently, many fuel dispensing pumps at service stations are equipped with vacuum assisted vapor recovery systems that collect fuel vapor vented from the fuel tank filler pipe during the fueling operation and transfer the vapor to the fuel storage tank.
Onboard, or vehicle carried, fuel vapor recovery and storage systems (commonly referred to as onboard refueling vapor recovery or ORVR) have been developed in which the head space or ullage in the vehicle fuel tank is vented through a charcoal-filled canister so that the vapor is absorbed by the charcoal. Subsequently, the fuel vapor is withdrawn from the canister into the engine intake manifold for mixture and combustion with the normal fuel and air mixture. The fuel tank head space must be vented to enable fuel to be withdrawn from the tank during vehicle operation. In typical ORVR systems, a canister outlet is connected to the intake manifold of the vehicle engine through a normally closed purge valve. The canister is intermittently subjected to the intake manifold vacuum with the opening and closing of the purge valve between the canister and intake manifold. A computer which monitors various vehicle operating conditions controls the opening and closing of the purge valve to assure that the fuel mixture established by the fuel injection system is not overly enriched by the addition of fuel vapor from the canister to the mixture.
Fuel dispensing systems at service stations having vacuum assisted vapor recovery capability which are unable to detect ORVR systems waste energy, increase wear and tear, ingest excessive air into the underground storage tank and cause excessive pressure buildup in the piping and underground storage tank due to the expanded volume of hydrocarbon saturated air.
Refueling of vehicles equipped with ORVR can be deleterious for both the vapor recovery efficiency of a vapor recovery system and the durability of some system components. The refueling of an ORVR equipped vehicle deprives the vapor recovery system of gasoline vapors intended to be returned to the storage tank, typically located underground. In lieu of having gasoline vapor available, the vapor pump of an assist-type system pumps air back into the storage tank. The air pumped back into the storage tank vaporizes liquid fuel that is in the storage tank, pressurizes the storage tank and is then vented to the atmosphere as polluting emissions.
One known type of assist vapor recovery system attempts to avoid the storage tank pressurization problem by sensing the presence of an ORVR equipped vehicle during refueling and uses this information to turn off the vapor pump during the refueling of an ORVR vehicle. A system's ability to recognize an ORVR equipped vehicle and adjust the fuel dispenser's vapor recovery system accordingly, eliminates the redundancy associated with operating two vapor recovery systems for one fueling operation. One example of this type of system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,275 issued to Gilbarco and hereby incorporated by reference. The reduction in vapor or air flow rate during an ORVR refueling will be 100% when the vapor pump is turned off; however, some initial run time is required for the pressure sensor to activate and turn the pump off.
Another example of an assist vapor recovery system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,095,204 issued to Healy and hereby incorporated by reference. The system of the '204 patent uses a vacuum control arrangement to limit air return in a vehicle equipped with ORVR so that the air return rate is only about 75% of the liquid gasoline delivery rate. This volume of air is disclosed as resulting in liquid gasoline evaporation underground sufficient to bring the total final volume back to a level equal to the liquid level dispensed.
Another type of known assist system utilizes a vapor flow restrictor built into the nozzle to decrease the vapor flow back to the storage tank during an ORVR refueling event. The nozzle for such a system utilizes a flexible boot to engage the filler neck of a vehicle, but an air-tight seal is prevented. In such systems, if an air-tight seal were present when a vapor pump is being used in conjunction with an ORVR vehicle, relatively high vacuum levels develop within the vapor space of the nozzle. These abnormally high vacuum levels cause abnormal operation of the automatic shut-off mechanism in the nozzle. The nozzle for such a system utilizes either a check valve or holes in the boot itself to limit the amount of vacuum to which the nozzle is exposed. Such vacuum relief measures allow the vacuum level to increase to a detectable level within the nozzle and the elevated vacuum level is used to operate a flow restrictor in the vapor flow path. The exact reduction in vapor (air) flow rate during an ORVR refueling with such a system is from 25% to 78% depending on the exact configuration and fueling flow rate.
Automobiles equipped with onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) prevent gasoline vapor in the tank of automobiles from being transferred to the underground storage tank (UST) using the vapor recovery equipment of gasoline dispensers (nozzle, hose, vapor pump, etc.). With no gasoline vapor to transfer to the UST, the vapor recovery equipment intakes, and transfers air to the UST, which causes the pressure in the UST to increase because the ingested air vaporizes gasoline in the UST. As the pressure in the UST increases, the emissions from the vapor recovery system increase from leaks in the system (fugitive emissions). In order to make assist-type gasoline dispensers compatible with ORVR equipped vehicles, the amount of air transferred to the UST when refueling an ORVR equipped vehicle must be reduced. However, operation of ORVR systems and vapor recovery equipment in gasoline dispensers together with seals between the nozzles and the filler necks which are provided to prevent the ingestion of air into the UST can lead to vacuum or pressure (relative to atmospheric pressure) in the filler neck. Such pressure or vacuum in the filler neck could adversely affect the operation of shut-off mechanisms in dispensing nozzles, causing either premature shut-off with a vacuum present, or no shut-off with pressure present.
Unfortunately, these and other known systems do not provide for assist-type vapor recovery systems that are compatible with ORVR systems while still maintaining the accurate and reliable operation of the automatic shut-off mechanism in the nozzle.
These and other problems with known fuel dispensing and associated vapor recovery systems have been overcome with this invention.
According to this invention, an improved nozzle and vapor recovery system configuration makes an assist-type gasoline dispenser compatible with ORVR equipped vehicles. Specifically, the spout shut-off mechanism of a nozzle functions without regard to variations in the level of vacuum in the filler neck, such as may occur when refueling vehicles having on board vapor recovery systems.
This invention utilizes an assist-type of nozzle that may be combined with a flexible boot to seal against the filler neck of the vehicle being refueled. This arrangement results in relatively high vacuum levels in the nozzle vapor space. To account for those vacuum levels, control of the shut-off mechanism is modified.
Current mechanical shut-off mechanisms for nozzles consist of a are diaphragm operated with a first side of the diaphragm vented to atmospheric pressure and a second, opposite side of the diaphragm vented to a vacuum producing poppet valve, which in turn is vented at the end of the nozzle spout. This invention vents both sides of the diaphragm near the end of the nozzle spout. Thus, in this invention two separate passageways lead from near the end of the nozzle spout, one leading to the vacuum producing poppet valve, then to the second side of the diaphragm, the other passageway leading to the first side of the diaphragm.
By venting both sides of the shut-off diaphragm in the same area in the filler neck, the shut-off diaphragm will not sense that there is any pressure or vacuum present on the filler neck (relative to atmospheric pressure) and the shut-off mechanism will operate in a normal manner. This invention allows the mechanical shut-off mechanism of the nozzle to be retained without modification and does not require, for example, conversion to an electronic shut-off. The respective openings of the spout vents may be positioned in several ways and only need to be in the same area of the filler pipe so that they are both subjected to any pressure variations that are present. In one embodiment of the nozzle according to this invention, the venting passageways are positioned inside the nozzle spout and in another embodiment of the nozzle according to this invention, the first side of the diaphragm is vented into the vapor path of the nozzle, for example into space between the spout and a surrounding boot, instead of a separate tube inside the spout.
As a further alternative embodiment, a vacuum assist vapor recovery dispenser is modified to render it ORVR compatible. Specifically, a bypass valve coupled to the vapor return line reduces the quantity of air ingested during refueling and minimizes the amount of air returned to the underground storage tanks (UST).
In this embodiment, a bypass valve is connected across the inlet and outlet of the vapor pump in the gasoline dispenser. The bypass valve, which is normally closed, is operated by a diaphragm, or other suitable means, connected to the inlet side of the vapor pump. Normally, the level of vacuum of the inlet to the pump is very low, i.e., the level merely corresponds to the pressure drop in the nozzle/hose/plumbing on the inlet side. With an ORVR vehicle, the vacuum level increases substantially due to the lack of vapor flow from a tank being refueled. This increased vacuum causes the bypass valve to open, simply allowing flow to recirculate at the vapor pump. This reduces the vapor/air flow back into the UST with an ORVR vehicle, reducing the pressurization of the UST.
As a complement, a vapor path primary valve can be placed on the inlet side of the vapor pump only. This primary valve is normally open. With an ORVR vehicle, the vacuum level increases substantially due to the lack of vapor flow. This increased vacuum causes the primary valve to close the inlet to the vapor pump. This reduces the vapor/air flow back to the UST with an ORVR vehicle, reducing the pressurization of the UST. The primary valve can also be modulated to control the vacuum at the nozzle.
Additionally, a secondary feature can be added to either the bypass valve or the primary valve configuration so that the vacuum level at the nozzle and filler neck can be regulated. A secondary valve is operated by the primary valve so that as the primary valve is operated to substantially closed the inlet side of the pump, the secondary valve is opened to regulate the vacuum level created by the ORVR system onboard the vehicle. In accordance with the present invention, the nozzle's shut-off characteristics are unaffected by the vacuum level in the filler neck, but the substantially elevated vacuum levels can cause the liquid in the filler neck to become elevated within the filler neck, and if the liquid reaches the tip of the nozzle, the nozzle's shut-off mechanism will function as it is intended to do. The complementary primary and/or secondary valves can overcome the possibility of liquid reaching the tip of the nozzle.
During refueling of an ORVR equipped vehicle, vacuum levels will rise quickly to about 7 inches H2O at which point the primary valve is set to actuate. With the primary valve actuated, the vacuum levels on the pump side increase substantially to the limits of the pump design. The vacuum levels on the nozzle side of the valve would similarly increase due to the action of the ORVR mechanism in the vehicle, but the secondary valve opens to reduce the vacuum level to prevent the liquid from shutting the nozzle off. It has been determined that a vacuum level in the filler neck of 3.0-5.0 inches H2O can be tolerated during refueling.
The above-described approaches provide advantages in reduced cost and simple installation. Specifically, a reconfiguration of existing dispenser plumbing and the modification to the nozzle is all that is required. The nozzle still has to stay “on” long enough to operate the valve, and there is still a substantial amount of vacuum in the filler neck from the ORVR action of the vehicle. The primary and/or secondary valve is a desirable feature primarily because of the liquid in the filler neck as described above. The primary and/or secondary valve itself could be placed in the hose or in the dispenser. With regard to the bypass valve, it is a much cheaper piece of hardware than, for example a hydrocarbon sensor, is often faster to respond, and does not require any electrical connections or electrical control means. Finally, the bypass valve configuration can be retrofitted into existing dispenser vapor plumbing.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
A fuel delivery hose 20 is connected to the nozzle 14 on one end and to a fuel dispensing system 22 on the opposite end. The fueling system 12 includes a vapor recovery system 24. As shown by the cut-away view of the interior of the fuel delivery hose 20, an annular fuel delivery passageway 26 is formed within the fuel delivery hose 20 for delivering fuel by a pump 28 from an underground storage tank (UST) 30 to the nozzle 14. A central, tubular vapor passage 32 as part of the vapor recovery system 24 is also within the fuel delivery hose 20 for transferring fuel vapors expelled from the vehicle's fuel tank 18 to the underground storage tank 30 during the fueling of the vehicle 10. The fuel delivery hose 20 is depicted as having the internal vapor passage 32 with the fuel delivery passage 26 concentrically surrounding it; however, other hose configurations are contemplated for use in the present invention.
As shown in
A vapor recovery pump 38 provides a vacuum in the vapor passage 32 for removing fuel vapor during a refueling operation. The vapor recovery pump 38 may be placed anywhere along the vapor recovery system 24 between the nozzle 14 and the underground fuel storage tank 30. Vapor recovery systems utilizing vapor recovery pumps of the type shown and described herein are well known in the industry and are commonly utilized for recovering vapor during refueling of conventional vehicles which are not equipped with on-board refueling vapor recovery (ORVR). A vehicle being refueled may include ORVR, for example an ORVR system 40 as shown in the vehicle of
The vehicle fuel tank of an ORVR equipped vehicle typically has an associated on-board vapor recovery system. The exemplary ORVR system 40 shown in
As liquid fuel rushes into the fuel tank 18 during the refueling operation, fuel vapors are drawn out of the fuel tank 18 through a spout 44 of the nozzle 14. The vapor recovery system 24 pulls the fuel vapors through the hose 20 along the vapor passage 32 and ultimately into the underground storage tank (UST) 30. This is standard operation when refueling vehicles not equipped with ORVR systems.
As shown in
Current mechanical shut-off mechanisms 100 for nozzles 14 include of a diaphragm 102, a first side 106 of the diaphragm 102 vents to pressure near the end of the spout 44 of the nozzle 14, a second side 104 of the diaphragm 102 is vented to a vacuum producing poppet valve 108, which in turn vents to the pressure near the end of the spout 44 of the nozzle 14. This invention vents both sides of the diaphragm 102 (
To make the assist-type vapor recovery system 24 compatible with ORVR equipped vehicles, the amount of air transferred to the UST 30 when fueling an ORVR equipped vehicle 10 must be reduced. By venting both sides 104,106 of the diaphragm 102 in the same area in the filler neck 16, the shut-off diaphragm 102 will not sense that there is any pressure or vacuum present on the filler neck 16 (relative to atmospheric pressure) and the shut-off mechanism 100 will operate in a normal manner. The illustrated configurations enable the mechanical shut-off mechanism 100 of the nozzle 14 to be retained without modification and does not require, for example, conversion to an electronic shut-off. The respective vents or passageways 112, 110 may be positioned in several ways and only need to be in communication with the same area of the filler pipe 16 relative to any pressure variations that are present.
Referring to
The nozzle 14 also includes the shut-off mechanism 100, only portions or which are shown in
The nozzle body assembly 114 includes a standard trigger lever 132 which is pivotally coupled by a pin 134 to the lower end of a shut-off actuator stem assembly 136. The lever 132 includes a grip 138 for actuation by a user to dispense fuel through the nozzle 14 and into the vehicle 10. The nozzle body assembly 114 includes a lever guard 140 surrounding the lever 132 as is customary in many nozzle configurations. A lock 142 is provided to releasably retain the lever 132 in an “on” position as is well known.
The venturi poppet member 124, which is seated in an inlet 144 of a chamber 146 in the nozzle body 114, acts as the vacuum generator 108 which is in communication with the second side 104 of the diaphragm 102 and also with pressure near the end of the spout 44 via the second passageway 110 (see
According to the embodiment of the invention shown in
As a result of the nozzle configurations shown in
As noted earlier with reference to
To overcome a possible problem with a large vacuum near the end of the spout 44, i.e., drawing fuel into the spout 44 so that the shut-off mechanism 100 is prematurely actuated by the fuel rather than by any vacuum or pressure, a vacuum assist vapor recovery dispenser 22 may be modified as illustrated in
Referring to
As a further alternative for ORVR compatibility, a normally open valve may be placed on the inlet side of the vapor pump 38 only. With an ORVR equipped vehicle, the vacuum level increases substantially due to the lack of vapor flow from the tank of the vehicle. This increased vacuum causes the normally open valve to close the inlet to the vapor pump 38 thereby reducing the vapor/air flow back to the UST 30 when refueling an ORVR equipped vehicle 10, reducing the pressurization of the UST 30.
Additionally, a secondary feature can be added to either the bypass or the normally open valve configuration so that the vacuum level at the nozzle 14 and filler neck 16 can be regulated. A secondary valve is operated by the primary valve so that once the primary valve has substantially bypassed or closed the inlet side of the pump 38, the secondary valve is opened to regulate the vacuum level created by the ORVR system 40 onboard the vehicle 10. With the modifications made to the nozzle 14 as described herein, the nozzle's shut-off characteristics are unaffected by the vacuum level in the filler neck 16, but the substantially elevated vacuum levels can cause the liquid in the filler neck 16 to become elevated within the filler neck 16, and if the liquid reaches the spout 44, the nozzle's shut-off mechanism 100 will function as it is intended to do.
During the refueling of an ORVR equipped vehicle, the vacuum levels will rise quickly to about 7 inches H2O vacuum at which point the valve will be set to actuate. With the valve actuated, the vacuum levels on the pump 38 side will increase substantially to the limits of the pump 38 design. The vacuum levels on the nozzle 14 side of the valve would similarly increase due to the action of the ORVR mechanism 40 in the vehicle 10, but the secondary valve opens to reduce the vacuum level to prevent the liquid from activating the shut-off mechanism 146. With such an arrangement, a vacuum level in the filler neck 16 of around 3.0-5.0 inches H2O can be tolerated during refueling.
The advantages of this invention relate to reduced cost and simple installation. Specifically, reconfiguration of existing dispenser plumbing and the modification to the nozzle are required. The nozzle 14 still has to stay “on” long enough to operate the valve, and there can still be a substantial amount of vacuum in the filler neck 16 from the ORVR 40 operation. The noted valve or valves could be placed in the hose 20 or in the dispenser 22. Further, when a bypass valve is used, it is a much cheaper piece of hardware than, for example a hydrocarbon sensor, is often faster to respond, and does not require any electrical connections or electrical control means. Finally, the bypass valve configuration can be easily retrofitted into existing dispenser vapor plumbing.
As shown in
Referring to
A valve assembly 56 is mounted for reciprocal movement in the housing 48 and intersects the primary vapor passage 50 in the assembly 46. The valve assembly 56 includes a sliding valve member 58 having a generally cylindrical portion 60 and a valve passage 62 which allows for vapor flow through the primary vapor passage 50 when the valve assembly 56 is in a first position as shown in
An upper, proximal end 66 of the valve member 58 is connected to a diaphragm 68, bellows or other expansible member which is captured within a chamber 70 in the housing 48. A plate 72 is mounted between the upper end 66 of the valve member 58 and the diaphragm 68. A conical spring 74 is mounted between the plate 72 on the valve member 58 and an annular groove 76 in the housing 48. The spring 74 urges or biases the valve member 58 upwardly so that the valve assembly 56 is urged toward the first position as shown in
A terminal end 80 of the valve member 58 includes a stop 82 juxtaposed to the housing 48 to define a secondary valve. An O-ring 84 is seated on a beveled surface 86 of the stop 82 for sealing an annular pocket 88 in the housing 48. A stem 90 projects from the valve member 58 through the pocket 88 and is connected to the stop 82. In the first position of the valve assembly 56 as shown in
In operation, the force of the spring 74 on the plate 72 and diaphragm 68 keeps the valve member 58 in the first position as shown in
As a result of the movement of the diaphragm 68 and plate 72, compression of the spring 74 and translation of the valve member 58, the primary vapor passage 50 is blocked off because the valve passage 62 no longer provides for the flow of vapor in the primary vapor passage 50 through the assembly 46. Moreover, the vacuum of the vapor recovery system 24 is blocked from communicating with the ORVR system 40. The valve member 58 in the second position as shown in
As shown in
The retrofit of an existing fuel system 12 to accomplish such an improvement is a simple matter of hanging a new nozzle assemble in the fuel system. It should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the retrofit of existing fuel systems is easily accomplished with the implementation and installation of an assembly as described herein. Additionally, the installation of new fuel systems preferably includes an assembly according to this invention.
From the above disclosure of the general principles of the present invention and the preceding detailed description of at least one preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will readily comprehend the various modifications to which this invention is susceptible. Therefore, I desire to be limited only by the scope of the following claims and equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/820,288, filed Apr. 8, 2004 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/461,097, filed Apr. 8, 2003 both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60461097 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10820288 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11751303 | May 2007 | US |