Embodiments described herein relate to the field of osmotically actuated fluidic valves. More particularly, embodiments described herein are related to the field of fluidic valves for ocular implants in ophthalmic treatment of diseases such as Glaucoma.
Glaucoma, a group of eye diseases affecting the retina and optic nerve, is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Most forms of glaucoma result when the intraocular pressure (IOP) increases above normal for prolonged periods of time. IOP can increase due to high resistance to the drainage of the aqueous humor relative to its production. Left untreated, an elevated IOP causes irreversible damage to the optic nerve and retinal fibers resulting in a progressive, permanent loss of vision.
The eye's ciliary body continuously produces aqueous humor, the clear fluid that fills the anterior segment of the eye (the space between the cornea and lens). The aqueous humor flows out of the anterior chamber (the space between the cornea and iris) through the trabecular meshwork and the uveoscleral pathways, both of which contribute to the aqueous humor drainage system. The delicate balance between the production and drainage of aqueous humor determines the eye's IOP.
One method of treating glaucoma includes implanting a drainage device in a patient's eye. Some embodiments of drainage devices include MEMS (Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems) fluidics valves that are low power and only require power to change their state. However, these valves are typically bi-positional: either fully opened or fully closed, and cannot be set at variable positions.
Therefore, there is a need for simple and compact drainage mechanisms to operate active fluidic elements independently for implantable systems.
According to some embodiments, an implantable fluidic valve actuated by osmotic pressure gradient includes: an input fluid channel; an output fluid channel in fluid communication with the input fluid channel at an aperture; and a semi-permeable membrane forming a portion of a sealed chamber. The semi-permeable membrane may have an outer surface forming a wall of the input fluid channel, and an inner surface forming a wall of the sealed chamber, the membrane being configured to allow diffusion of a solvent into and out of the sealed chamber; and a first electrode and a second electrode disposed within the sealed chamber configured to receive a voltage.
According to some embodiments, an ocular implant for treating an ocular condition includes an inlet tube sized to receive aqueous humor; and an intra-ocular pressure (IOP) control system to regulate drainage of aqueous humor from the inlet tube. In some embodiments, the IOP control system includes a fluidic valve having an input fluid channel coupled to the inlet tube; an output fluid channel in communication with the input fluid channel at an aperture; and a semi-permeable membrane configured to selectively displace relative to the aperture. The membrane may have an outer side adjacent the input fluid channel and an inner side forming a part of a chamber, the chamber including a first electrode and a second electrode configured to affect free ions in the chamber.
In embodiments as disclosed herein, a method for regulating fluid flow in an ocular implant with a valve having a membrane separating an environment fluid from a chamber containing an electrolyte solution may include applying a first current through a first and a second electrode in the chamber; allowing the electrolyte solution to reach osmotic equilibrium with the environment fluid in a manner that modifies the volume of the chamber; applying a second current through the first and the second electrodes in the chamber; allowing the electrolyte solution to reach osmotic equilibrium with the environment fluid in a manner that modifies the volume of the chamber.
In some embodiments, an implantable fluidic pump actuated by osmotic pressure gradient may include an input fluid channel; an output fluid channel in fluid communication with the input fluid channel at an aperture; a semi-permeable membrane forming a portion of a sealed chamber, the semi-permeable membrane having an outer surface forming a wall of the input fluid channel, and having an inner surface forming a wall of the sealed chamber, the membrane being configured to allow diffusion of a solvent into and out of the sealed chamber; a first electrode and a second electrode disposed within the sealed chamber configured to receive a voltage; and an output check valve separating the output fluid channel from an exterior environment.
In some embodiments, an implantable fluidic pump actuated by osmotic pressure gradient may include an input fluid channel; a pump chamber in fluid communication with the input fluid channel; an output fluid channel in fluid communication with the pump chamber; a non-permeable, deformable membrane forming a portion of a sealed chamber, the non-permeable, deformable membrane having an outer surface forming a wall of the pump chamber, and having an inner surface forming a wall of the sealed chamber; a semi-permeable membrane forming a second portion of a sealed chamber and having an outer surface forming a wall of the input fluid and an inner surface forming a wall of the sealed chamber; a first electrode and a second electrode disposed within the sealed chamber configured to receive a voltage; and an output check valve separating the pump chamber from the output fluid channel. The implantable fluidic pump may also include an input check valve separating the pump chamber from the input fluid channel and an outlet check valve separating the pump chamber from the output fluid channel (where the input check valve and the output check valve may be configured to allow an environment fluid to flow from the input channel to the output channel).
These and other embodiments of the present invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the following drawings.
In the figures, elements having the same reference number have the same or similar functions.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the present disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is intended. Any alterations and further modifications to the described devices, instruments, methods, and any further application of the principles of the present disclosure are fully contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the disclosure relates. In particular, it is fully contemplated that the features, components, and/or steps described with respect to one embodiment may be combined with the features, components, and/or steps described with respect to other embodiments of the present disclosure. For simplicity, in some instances the same reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The present disclosure relates generally to a method and system for regulating fluidic flow through an implanted device used to control IOP. In the embodiments disclosed herein, the method and system may utilize osmotic principles to actuate a flow regulator, such as a variable state valve or pump, that increases or decreases drainage flow. Some embodiments operate by changing the number of free ions in a solution within a chamber defined by sealed semi-permeable membrane. Based on the number of free ions, the membrane will inflate or deflate via osmosis, thus opening and closing the flow regulator, such as the variable state valve or pump. The flow regulator is able to control fluidic flow at variable levels while using low amounts of power to maintain valve or pump set points.
In some embodiments processor 215 is an integrated circuit with power, input, and output pins capable of performing logic functions. Processor 215 may be a controller that controls different components performing different functions. Memory 220 may be a semiconductor memory that interfaces with processor 215. It may include executable instructions as performed by processor 215. In one example, processor 215 can write data and commands to, and read data and commands from, memory 220. For example, processor 215 can be configured to read data from sensor system 210 and write that data to memory 220. In this manner, a series of sensed or calculated IOP readings can be stored in memory 220. Processor 215 is also capable of performing other basic memory functions, such as erasing or overwriting memory 220, detecting when memory 220 is full, and other common functions associated with managing semiconductor memory.
Valve system 230 may include a passive valve, a pressure driven valve, an electronically controlled valve, or other type of valve controlling flow of aqueous humor through IOP control system 200. Valve system 230 may include any number of valves and valve types, in combination. Some embodiments also include one or more pumping systems cooperating with one or more valves in valve system 230, providing pressure relief when needed. Pumps are also contemplated and may form a part of the valve system, or a separate part of the IOP control system 200.
As shown in
Generally, IOP is a gauge pressure reading—the difference between the absolute pressure in the eye (e.g. as measured by sensor P1) and atmospheric pressure (e.g. as measured by the sensor P3). For example, in some embodiments sensor P1 may take pressure readings for anterior chamber 175 (as measured by sensor P1), sensor P2 may take pressure readings for a drainage location (as measured by sensor P2) and atmospheric pressure in the vicinity of the eye (as measured by the sensor P3). The pressure readings of sensors P1, P2, and P3 and the results of any calculations can be stored in memory 220 by processor 215. In some embodiments, they can later be read from memory 220 so that actual IOP over time can be interpreted by a physician.
Readings from pressure sensors P1, P2, and P3 can be used to control IOP by adjusting the valve system 230 to stop or throttle flow. Valve system 230 may be controlled by processor 215 based on input data received from sensor system 210. A desired pressure differential (corresponding to a desired flow rate) can be maintained by controlling the operation of the valve system 230. Likewise, various intraocular pressure parameters, such as, by way of non-limiting example, a desired IOP, an IOP change rate, and/or a bleb pressure may be controlled by controlling the operation of valve system 230.
Data transmission module 225 may transmit information from the implanted IOP control system 200 or may receive information, according to some embodiments. In some embodiments, the data transmission module 225 may include a radio-frequency (RF) device using a digital data protocol. It may include one or both of a transmitter and a receiver, and in some embodiments, includes a transceiver. In some embodiments, the data transmission module may communicate with an external unit that may be configured to verify the readings from sensor system 210 indicating the pressure at the dry subconjunctiva under IOP control system 200 or may communicate programming or other information to IOP control system 200.
Plate 300 is configured to fit at least partially within the subconjunctival space and its dimensions may vary. In some embodiments plate 300 is between about 15 mm×12 mm to about 30 mm×15 mm or an area of approximately 250-350 in2, with a thickness less than about 2 mm, and preferably less than about 1.5 mm. Plate 300 may be formed in a curved shape to the radius of the eye globe (about 0.5 inches). In some embodiments, plate 300 may be rigid and preformed with a curvature suitable to substantially conform to the eye globe or it may be flexible and able to flex to conform to the eye globe. Some embodiments are small enough that conforming to the eye globe provides little benefit in comfort or implantation technique. The above dimensions are exemplary only, and other sizes and arrangements are contemplated herein.
Inlet tube 301 extends from an anterior side of plate 300 and extends into anterior chamber 175. Inlet tube 301 includes an open end and a lumen that extends into an active portion inside plate 300. The active portion inside plate 300 may include IOP control system 200, according to some embodiments. Outlet tube 302 is coupled to the active portion inside plate 300 and includes an open end and a lumen extending to an outer portion of the eye. According to some embodiments, aqueous humor from anterior chamber 175 flows through inlet tube 301 and exits in the vicinity of plate 300, or through outlet tube 302, to a drainage site. In some embodiments, the flow of aqueous humor through drainage device 350 is controlled by the active portion inside plate 300. The drainage site may be in the vicinity of plate 300 or at the open end of outlet tube 302 draining to an alternate location such as the suprachoroidal space or may be proximate to plate 300.
In some embodiments, inlet tube 301 and optional outlet tube 302 drain aqueous humor from the anterior chamber 175 of the eye to the drainage site. Valve system 230 in IOP control system 200, included in plate 300, controls flow of aqueous humor through tubes 301 and 302. In some embodiments, pressure sensor P1 measures pressure at inlet tube 301, upstream from valve system 230 (in plate 300). In this manner, pressure sensor P1 measures pressure in anterior chamber 175.
Optional outlet tube 302 shunts fluid to a drainage location, which may be at any of numerous locations within the eye. In some embodiments, outlet tube 302 may shunt aqueous humor from anterior chamber 175 to the subconjunctival space. Alternatively, outlet tube 302 may shunt aqueous humor from anterior chamber 175 to the subscleral space. In some embodiments, outlet tube 302 may shunt aqueous humor from anterior chamber 175 to the suprachoroidal space, the supraciliary space, the juxta-uveal space, or to the choroid, forming aqueous reservoirs to facilitate absorption in those respective locations. In some embodiments, outlet tube 302 shunts aqueous humor from anterior chamber 175 to Schlemm's canal, a collector channel in Schlemm's canal, or any of a number of different blood vessels like an episcleral vein. In some examples, outlet tube 302 even shunts aqueous humor from anterior chamber 175 to outside the conjunctiva. Each of the different anatomical locations to which aqueous humor is shunted is an example of a drainage location.
Embodiments consistent with the present disclosure include one or more valves such as valves V1, V2, and V3 in valve system 230 (cf.
In the embodiment shown, valve 400 includes a semi-permeable membrane 401 and at least one electrode, referenced by the numerals 421 and 422. Membrane 401 creates a sealed chamber 403 housing the electrodes 421, 422, and encloses a fluid 411 having an electrolyte in solution. Thus, the semi-permeable membrane 401 forms a sealed chamber 403 containing fluid 411. Semi-permeable membrane 401 allows small solvent molecules such as water to diffuse from one side of the membrane to the opposite side of the membrane. Membrane 401 may block the passage of positive or negative ions in an electrolyte solution and non-ionic species in solution from one side of the membrane to the opposite side of the membrane. In some embodiments, membrane 401 is deformable or flexible, so that it expands or contracts with the diffusion of solvent in and out of the membrane, changing the volume of sealed chamber 403. In some embodiments, membrane 401 may include a portion which is semi-permeable and a portion which is deformable or flexible, such as a diaphragm. Further according to some embodiments, sealed chamber 403 may have a semi-permeable membrane portion separated from a deformable or flexible diaphragm.
According to some embodiments, membrane 401 or the diaphragm may flex or deform to block or partially block the aperture 480 fluidly connecting channel 470 to channel 475, thereby reducing or increasing a fluid flow from input fluidic channel 470 to output fluidic channel 475. According to some embodiments, semi-permeable membrane 401, or the semi-permeable portion of membrane 401 may have a thickness between about 2 to 10 microns (1 micron, 1 μm=10−3 mm=10−6 m). In some embodiments, the thickness of a semi-permeable membrane included in membrane 401 may be as low as 500 Å (angstroms or 10−10 meters). In some embodiments, membrane 401 may have a circular shape with a diameter of approximately 500 μm to a few millimeters. The materials used to fabricate a membrane with semi-permeable properties as disclosed herein may be polymers. An example of a polymer that may be used for semi-permeable membrane 401 includes a non-porous material such as Parylene, including Parylene-C, Parylene-N, Parylene-D, and Parylene-HT. Other examples include Polyimide, Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), or other plastics or epoxies. In some embodiments, a silicone-based material such as Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) may be used to form membrane 401. In some embodiments the membrane may comprise a composite of layers such as gold and parylene. Other materials may be used as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
As illustrated in
The ions dissolved in fluid 411 separate into positive ions 415 and negative ions when a voltage difference is applied between electrodes 422 and 421. Positive ions 415 are displaced towards the proximity of (negatively biased) electrode 421, and in the case of metallic ions some of the ions forming a plating layer 425 on the surface of electrode 421. Thus, fluid 411 changes its osmolarity as positive ions 415 accumulate on the surface of electrode 421, and come out of solution. In some embodiments, the osmolarity of fluid 411 may drop below the osmolarity of environment fluid 410 when plating layer 425 is formed. In such embodiments, equilibrium between the osmolarity of fluid 410 and osmolarity of fluid 411 may be reached through diffusion of a solvent across semi-permeable membrane 401. The solvent may be water molecules diffusing from fluid 410 to fluid 411 through semi-permeable membrane 401. As molecules diffuse through the semi-permeable membrane 401, the volume of the chamber 403 increases, expanding the chamber, and reducing the size of the channel 470. So doing also reduces flow through aperture 480, thereby modifying the drainage rate through the valve.
The osmolarity in fluid 411 is determined by concentration of ions and other dissolved species in solution. As indicated above, the ions in solution in fluid 411 include positive and negative ions. The positive ion concentration is proportional to the number of positive ions 415 present in fluid 411 and inversely proportional to the volume of fluid 411. In some embodiments, changing the number of positive ions 415 in fluid 411 induces a change of volume in sealed chamber 403, to keep equilibrium with the osmolarity of fluid 410. In turn, the volume of sealed chamber 403 determines the amount of flow from channel 470 through channel 475 as membrane 401 opens or closes the aperture connecting channel 470 and channel 475. When the volume of the chamber 411 increases the membrane distends and occludes aperture 480, and narrows the fluidic path, reducing flow 405. Eventually the aperture connecting channel 470 with channel 475 may be blocked by membrane 401, stopping flow 405 completely. Thus, valve 400 can be set to variable flow positions by merely sending power to the electrodes. In addition, since the electrodes use only small amounts of power, the device may utilize low power to regulate the fluid flow through the valve. When osmolarity is equal in fluid 410 and in fluid 411, equilibrium is reached and the position of membrane 401 is steady. Once equilibrium is reached between the osmolarity of fluid 410 and the osmolarity of fluid 411, very small amounts of power may be used to maintain a specific set point. In some embodiments, once equilibrium is reached little to no power is used to maintain a set point. In some embodiments a set point for valve 401 may be fully open or fully closed, or may be an intermediate position such as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the electrolytic solution included in fluid 411 may include copper sulfate, and the electrodes 421 and 422 may be formed of a conductive material such as platinum or gold. As such, positive ions 415 are copper ions. In such embodiments, applying a voltage through electrodes 421 and 422 results in electroplating some of the copper ions contained in the copper sulfate solution onto electrode 421 (negatively biased in this example) within sealed chamber 403. Electrode 422 (positively biased in this example) completes an electric circuit for electroplating. As copper ions in the electrolyte solution are plated onto electrode 421 they are consequently removed from solution and the number of total species contributing to the solution's osmotic pressure is reduced, reducing the osmolarity of fluid 411. In some embodiments, the electrolytic solution included in fluid 411 may be silver salts, such as silver halides. Some examples of silver salts used in an electrolyte solution in fluid 411 include, but are not limited to, silver bromide (AgBr), silver chloride (AgCl), silver iodide (AgI), and others, such as silver fluorides. In such embodiments, positive ions 415 include silver ions (Ag+, and Ag++). Other materials are also contemplated.
The use of copper and silver salts as electrolytes in fluid 411 is not limiting. One of ordinary skill would recognize that different electrolyte solutions may be used in fluid 411, consistent with embodiments disclosed herein. For example, some embodiments may use zinc sulfate, zinc chlorate, or nickel chloride solutions in fluid 411. The above salts and electrolytes are not limiting of embodiments consistent with the present disclosure, as other electrolyte solutions may be contemplated by one of ordinary skill.
As ions are removed from solution, osmolarity in fluid 411 eventually drops below that of fluid 410. Membrane 401 is permeable to water (or other solvent molecules), but not to positive ions 415 or negative ions or other species contributing to the osmotic pressure; therefore, net water diffusion through the membrane will be out of sealed chamber 403 and into the flow channel 470. In such configuration, the volume of the chamber defined in part by the membrane 401 decreases due to the outflow, increasing osmotic pressure inside sealed chamber 403, opening valve 400 to permit drainage fluid flow. The response time of valve 400 is limited by the diffusion rate of water or the solvent in fluid 411 through the membrane.
According to some embodiments, reducing the voltage between electrodes 421 and 422 to zero results in the gradual re-incorporation of positive ions 415 into solution in fluid 411. As the additional ion concentration increases the osmolarity in fluid 411, the resulting osmolarity imbalance will generate diffusion of water or solvent molecules from fluid 410 into sealed chamber 403. For example, when copper ions are positive ions 415, reducing the voltage difference between electrodes 421 and 422 allows copper ions to re-dissolve into the acidic Copper Sulfate electrolytic solution (which forms sulfuric acid as copper is removed from solution). This increases the volume of sealed chamber 403 until osmolarity in fluid 411 reaches equilibrium with osmolarity in fluid 410. The initial configuration is then recovered. The time it takes for valve 400 to recover the initial configuration may be determined by the speed of diffusion of the water or solvent molecules through membrane 401, and the time it takes for ions 415 to dissolve from the plating layer 425 into solution.
In some embodiments it may be desirable that the conducting material forming electrode 421 and electrode 422 have a higher electro-plating voltage than the material in plated layer 425. For example, when plated layer 425 is formed of copper, it is desirable to have electrodes 421 and 422 made of, for example, platinum or gold, which have a higher electro-plating voltage than copper. This ensures that when a positive voltage to electrode 421 is applied, ions from electrode 421 will not be transferred into fluid 411. Thus, in some embodiments it is desirable that the voltage difference applied between electrodes 421 and 422 has a value lower than an electro-plating voltage of the electrode material (e.g., copper or gold), and a higher voltage than an electro-plating voltage of a plating layer 425 formed of electrolyte ions (e.g., copper ions).
Because copper has a relatively low electro-plating potential, a low voltage may be used to remove plating layer 425 to increase the number of free ions in sealed chamber 403, and ultimately increase the volume of sealed chamber 403. The low voltage used ensures that material forming electrode 421 (such as platinum/gold) is not dissolved into fluid 411. Methods that prevent positive ions 415 from plating electrode 421 thus creating a valve 400 that can be actuated in either direction (inflate/deflate) rapidly are also contemplated. Such methods may include encapsulating electrode 421 with a material (e.g., polymer) that allows the flow of electrons, but not positive ions 415. In such embodiments, positive ions 415 may still form a densely packed layer 425 around a negatively biased electrode 421, without adhering to the electrode material.
In some embodiments, osmotic pressure-based valve 400 may use little power for actuation. Furthermore, the valve opening may be set at any degree of variable opening between fully closed and fully opened. In some embodiments, flow control is established by adjusting the osmotic pressure within sealed chamber 403 applying a voltage difference between electrodes 421 and 422. According to some embodiments, once equilibrium between the osmolarity in fluid 410 and the osmolarity in fluid 411 is reached, a low amount of power is used to maintain a set point for valve 400. Furthermore, in some embodiments no power may be necessary to maintain the equilibrium configuration. Membrane 401, or a deformable diaphragm in membrane 401 may deform by several hundreds of microns. In some embodiments, membrane 401 or a deformable diaphragm in membrane 401, may deform by 1 mm, or up to 2 mm.
Similar osmotic pressure valve designs which utilize a semi-permeable membrane, and a mechanism other than electroplating to change the osmolarity of the solution, may be possible.
In some embodiments, fluidic pump 700 includes the actuation of a diaphragm using osmotic pressure and semi-permeable, non-deformable membrane 702. In the example, shown in
The application and cessation of a voltage difference between electrodes 421 and 422 in a sequential manner may pump fluid from inlet channel 470 to output channel 475, as indicated by the arrows 705 in
In some embodiments, an osmotically actuated fluidic valve or pump, such as valve 400, or pump 700 may be used for applications such as drug delivery. For example, an environment fluid such as fluid 410 may include blood or a blood plasma. Further according to embodiments used for drug delivery, input fluidic channel 470 may be coupled to an environment including a solution having a drug dissolved in it. In such embodiments, output fluidic channel 475 may be coupled to an organ, a bodily cavity, or a blood vessel, for drug delivery.
Turning now to
In some embodiments, IOP control system 200 monitors pressure via sensor system 210 and applies current when processor 215 determines that the pressure should be adjusted to treat an ocular condition. For example, processor 215 may determine that IOP is higher than desired based on the feedback from sensor system 210. In response, processor 215 may apply a voltage to the electrodes in order to reduce the number of free ions in the chamber. This in turn results in an increased flow of fluid from inside the chamber, through the membrane, into the channel outside the chamber. Accordingly, the volume of the chamber decreases, correspondingly increasing the size of the channel at the aperture. This increase in size results in a higher flow and increased drainage through the valve, thereby lowering IOP from its undesirably elevated state.
In 810, the current may be applied for a short period of time. For example, in some embodiments, 810 includes applying a voltage between the electrodes in the sealed chamber. The voltage may be selected to produce a current so that a pre-selected amount of positive ions in the electrolyte solution forms a plating layer on the negatively biased electrode. Such plating layer may be as plating layer 425 on electrode 421 (cf.
At 820, the valve setting is adjusted as a result of fluid in the sealed chamber reaching osmotic equilibrium with the environment fluid in the flow channel. According to some embodiments, 820 includes allowing solvent molecules to diffuse through the semi-permeable membrane from a location inside the sealed chamber to a location outside the sealed chamber. Furthermore, 820 may include allowing the semi-permeable membrane to deform as loss of solvent molecules decreases the fluid volume inside the sealed chamber. According to some embodiments, a wall separating the environment fluid from the fluid inside the sealed chamber may include a deformable and flexible diaphragm. In such embodiments, 820 may include allowing the diaphragm to deform accordingly. The result of 820 is a contraction of the deformable membrane, reducing the volume inside the sealed chamber. As a result, the flow path increases in size and the amount of environment fluid flow through valve 400 increases. Thus, the flow of an environment fluid may be regulated by following method 800. The valve adjustment at 820 may take any period of time. The time to adjust the valve setting may depend on the amount of current applied in 810 and on the volume change required in the sealed chamber 403 to reach equilibrium. The period of time may also depend on the thickness of semi-permeable membrane 401. Thus, the period of time may take a few seconds, up to several minutes, or even an hour or more, according to some embodiments. The period of time may be accelerated by applying small pulses of current to the electrodes. Furthermore, the train of current pulses applied to the electrodes may be selected in magnitude and time sequence in order to adjust the period of time to achieve a valve setting. For example, in some embodiments a train of pulses may be applied to maintain a selected osmolarity of the fluid in the sealed chamber, as ions in the plating layer may continuously re-dissolve into the fluid in the sealed chamber.
In 830, ions from the plating layer formed on an electrode are allowed to re-dissolve into the electrolyte solution in the fluid inside the sealed chamber. For example, 830 may include stopping the current flow through the electrodes by reducing the voltage bias between the electrodes to zero (0 V). 830 may take a few seconds, minutes, hours, or even more, according to some embodiments. A shorter or longer period of time in 830 may be selected based upon the desired fluid flow through the valve.
In 840, the valve setting is adjusted as the fluid in the sealed chamber is allowed to reach osmotic equilibrium with the environment fluid in the flow channel. 840 may include using the semi-permeable membrane in a similar manner to 820, but with solvent molecules moving from the flow channel outside the sealed chamber 403 to inside sealed chamber 403. Thus, in 840 the deformable membrane expands, resulting in a partial or total occlusion of an aperture fluidly connecting an input fluidic channel to an output fluidic channel in the valve. As a result, the flow paths decrease in size and the amount of environment fluid flow through valve 400 decreases.
In some embodiments, method 800 may be at least partially performed using an osmotically actuated fluidic pump, such as pump 700 described in detail above (cf.
Embodiments of the invention described above are exemplary only. One skilled in the art may recognize various alternative embodiments from those specifically disclosed. Those alternative embodiments are also intended to be within the scope of this disclosure. As such, the invention is limited only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/737,959 titled “OSMOTICALLY ACTUATED FLUIDIC VALVE,” filed on Dec. 17, 2012, whose inventor is Nicholas Max Gunn, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as though fully and completely set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4089329 | Couvillon, Jr. et al. | May 1978 | A |
4206762 | Cosman | Jun 1980 | A |
4457757 | Molteno | Jul 1984 | A |
4560375 | Schulte et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4656827 | Puillet | Apr 1987 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4869282 | Sittler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4922913 | Waters, Jr. et al. | May 1990 | A |
5005577 | Frenkel | Apr 1991 | A |
5083742 | Wylie et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5171132 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5179953 | Kursar | Jan 1993 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5466233 | Weiner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573646 | Saito et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5626558 | Suson | May 1997 | A |
5681275 | Ahmed | Oct 1997 | A |
5702618 | Saaski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707643 | Ogura et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722948 | Gross | Mar 1998 | A |
5891097 | Saito et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910110 | Bastable | Jun 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6048328 | Haller | Apr 2000 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6056269 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6240962 | Tai et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251090 | Avery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261256 | Ahmed | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6443893 | Schnakenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447449 | Fleischman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468283 | Richter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6533733 | Ericson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6579235 | Abita et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589198 | Soltanpour et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6682500 | Soltanpour | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712764 | Jeffries et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719750 | Varner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726676 | Stegmann et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749568 | Fleischman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6939299 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6962573 | Wilcox | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976982 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7025740 | Ahmed | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7137952 | Leonardi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7169106 | Fleischman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7252006 | Tai et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304334 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7354416 | Quiroz-Mercado et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7409863 | Bateman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7544176 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7612328 | Kaiser | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648465 | Gordon | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7756559 | Abreu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7824699 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8123687 | Dacquay et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8182435 | Dacquay et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206440 | Guarnieri | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257295 | Rickard et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8419673 | Rickard | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8545431 | Rickard | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549925 | Tai et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579848 | Field et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585631 | Dacquay | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585664 | Dos Santos et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8603024 | Bohm et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8652085 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8721580 | Rickard et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753305 | Field et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8814820 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8840578 | Dos Santos et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858491 | Field et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864701 | Dos Santos et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8986240 | Dos Santos et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9072588 | Bohm et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9125721 | Field | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9132034 | Dos Santos | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010000527 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20020013545 | Soltanpour et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019607 | Bui | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049374 | Abreu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020087111 | Ethier | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099359 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103412 | Trimmer | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139947 | Wang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156413 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156461 | Joshi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165478 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169468 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175191 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193674 | Fleischman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014036 | Varner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078487 | Jeffries et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030146401 | Wetzel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030225318 | Montegrande et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234376 | Cabuz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040013702 | Glover | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059248 | Messner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073137 | Lloyd et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073156 | Brown | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116794 | Fink et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040186367 | Fresco | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040228734 | Jeon et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254438 | Chuck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254517 | Quiroz-Mercado et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016866 | Kramer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067029 | Henning et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050159660 | Montegrande et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273033 | Grahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060041220 | Boukhny et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060131350 | Schechter et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189916 | Bas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070019156 | Fink | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032757 | Medow et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070077270 | Wen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106199 | Krivoy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106200 | Levy | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109117 | Heitzmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123767 | Montegrande et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129623 | Fleischman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156079 | Brown | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070212397 | Roth | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243111 | Momose | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251592 | Christenson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255262 | Haase | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080015421 | Penner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027478 | Connors et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077127 | Gao et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097276 | Bertrand et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125691 | Yaron et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129486 | Jeckelmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147021 | Jani | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257915 | Wold | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090069648 | Irazoqui et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076367 | Sit et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090143713 | Van Dam et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196903 | Kliman | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227933 | Karageozian | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240215 | Humayun et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090275924 | Lattanzio et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312742 | Pang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010416 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042209 | Guarnieri | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100114006 | Baerveldt | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121248 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121348 | van der Burg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122733 | Grygus et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100174272 | Weiner | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100222769 | Meng et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222770 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234717 | Wismer | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249691 | Van Der Mooren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253167 | Charnley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280349 | Dacquay et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305550 | Meng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007454 | Tang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046536 | Stegmann et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071454 | Dos Santos et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071456 | Rickard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071458 | Rickard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071459 | Rickard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071505 | Rickard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077626 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082385 | Diaz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110144617 | Meng et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203700 | Scholten et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110248671 | Dos Santos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282328 | Ambati et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004528 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022505 | Dacquay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022506 | Rickard et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120039770 | Namkoong et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120296258 | Rickard et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302861 | Marshall et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316492 | Chappel | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000765 | Fernandes et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085440 | Bohm | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144202 | Field et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150774 | Field et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150775 | Dos Santos et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150777 | Bohm et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150778 | Dos Santos | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150779 | Field | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158381 | Rickard | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204177 | Field et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211311 | Field | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211312 | Gelvin | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218064 | Rickard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130317413 | Field et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130338564 | Rickard et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140039374 | Dos Santos et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140107557 | Dos Santos et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140163448 | Lind et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166140 | Santos et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140171777 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172090 | Gunn | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150057523 | Gunn | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057592 | Gunn | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057593 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057595 | Gunn et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057596 | Lind et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150150720 | Gunn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230982 | Gunn et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230984 | Gunn | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101360523 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101466299 | Jun 2009 | CN |
4438201 | May 1996 | DE |
0102747 | Mar 1984 | EP |
1195523 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1296067 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1917987 | May 2008 | EP |
03049775 | Aug 1992 | JP |
2005535392 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007512866 | May 2007 | JP |
WO9303665 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO9803665 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9803809 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9938470 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO0174427 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0194784 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO02056758 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO03001991 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO03102632 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004014218 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2005079204 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005088417 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2007127305 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007136993 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008060649 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008061043 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008084350 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2008094672 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2009010799 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009026499 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009049686 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009081031 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2010129446 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2010136071 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2011034727 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011034738 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011034740 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011034742 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011035218 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2012012017 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2013052332 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013058943 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013085894 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013085895 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013090006 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013090231 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013123142 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2012/66709, Apr. 19, 2013, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/66709, Apr. 19, 2013, 5 pages. |
Byunghoon Bae, Hongseok Kee, Seonho Kim, Yeon Lee, Taeseok Sim, Yongkweon Him and Kyihwan Park; “In Vitro Experiment of the Pressure Regulating Valve for a Glaucoma Impact”; Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 13 (2003); pp. 613-619. |
Eggers, T., et al, “Wireless Intra-Ocular Pressure Monitoring System Integrated Into an Artificial Lens,” 1st Annual Int'l IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Oct. 12-14, 2000, pp. 466-469, Lyon, France. |
Greene, M.E. and Gilman, B.G., “Intraocular Pressure Measurement With Instrumented Contact Lenses,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IVOS), Apr. 1974, pp. 299-302, vol. 13, No. 4, IVOS. |
Hjortdal, Jesper and Jensen, Peter, “In Vitro Measurement of Corneal Strain, Thickness, and Curvature Using Digital Image Processing,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 1995, pp. 5-11, vol. 73, Denmark. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/033329, Jul. 13, 2010, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/033329, Jul. 13, 2010, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/047429, Nov. 1, 2010, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/047429, Nov. 1, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/047600, Dec. 14, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/047600, Dec. 14, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/049424, Nov. 26, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/049424, Nov. 26, 2010, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2011/036742, Aug. 17, 2011, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2011/036742, Aug. 17, 2011, 5 pages. |
Lam, Andrew K.C. and Douthwaite, William A., “The Effect of an Artificially Intraocular Pressure on the Central Corneal Curvature,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1997, pp. 18-24, vol. 17, No. 1, Elsevier Science, Ltd., Great Britain. |
Leonardi, Matteo, et al., “A Soft Contact Lens With a Mems Strain Gage Embedded for Intraocular Pressure Monitoring,” In Proc. 12th Int'l Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Jun. 8-12, 2003, pp. 1043-1046, vol. 2, Boston, MA. |
Leonardi, Matteo, et al., “First Steps Toward Noninvasive Intraocular Pressure Monitoring with a Sensing Contact Lens,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IVOS), 2004, pp. 3113-3117, vol. 45, No. 9, IVOS. |
McLaren, Jay W., et al. “Continuous Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Rabbits by Telemetry,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IVOS), May 1996, pp. 966-975, vol. 37, No. 6, IVOS. |
Puers, Robert, “Linking Sensors with Telemetry. Impact on the System Design,” In Proc. 8th Int'l Conference of Solid State Sensors, Actuators, Eurosens, Jun. 25-29, 1995, pp. 169-174, Stockholm, Sweden. |
Schnakenberg, U., et al. “Initial Investigations on Systems for Measuring Intraocular Pressure,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, p. 287-291, vol. 85, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
Stangel, Karsten, et al. “A Programmable Intraocular CMOS Pressure Sensor System Implant,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jul. 2001, pp. 1094-1100, vol. 36, No. 7, IEEE, Germany. |
Ullerich, Stella, et al. “Micro Coils for an Advanced System for Measuring Intraocular Pressure,” 1st Annual Int'l IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Oct. 12-14, 2000, pp. 470-474, Lyon, France. |
Van Schuylenbergh, K., et al. “An Implantable Telemetric Tonometer for Direct Intraocular Pressure Measurements,” 1st European Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 1991, pp. 194-195, vol. 17, No. 20, Nice, France. |
Walter, Peter; Intraocular Pressure Sensor: Where Are We—Where Will We Go? Journal Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Publisher Springer Berline/Heidelberg: ISSN 0721-832X (Print) 1435-702X (Online): Issue vol. 240, No. 5/May 2002 DOI 10.1007/s00417-002-0474-y: pp. 335-336; Subject Collection Medicine. |
Neagu Cristina R.; “A Medical Microactuator Based on an Electrochemical Principle”; Thesis at the Twente University,the Netherlands, Enschede; Aug. 28, 1998; pp. 1-162. |
Saloomeh Saati M.D., et al.; “Mini Drug Pump for Ophthalmic Use”; Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2009; 107; pp. 60-71. |
Stemme et al.; “A Valveless Diffuser/Nozzle-Based Fluid Pump”; ScienceDirect; Sensors and Actuators A, 39; pp. 159-167 (1993). |
Nisar, et al.; MEMS-Based Micropumps in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications; ScienceDirect; Sensors and Actuators B 130; pp. 917-942 (2008). |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT US2010/047605; Dec. 16, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT US2010/047605; Dec. 16, 2010, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2010/047612; Dec. 21, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2010/047612; Dec. 21, 2010, 10 pages. |
Weiner A L, 2007, “Drug Delivery Systems in Ophthalmic Applications, In: Ocular Therapeutics; Eye on New Discoveries; T. Yorio, A. Clark, M.Wax, Eds, Elsevier Press/Academic Press. New York”, pp. 7-43. |
Yasukawa T et al., 2001, “Biodegradable scleral plugs for vitreoretinal drug delivery”, Adv. Drug Del Rev., 52(1), 25-36. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report PCT/US2013/026066, Apr. 17, 2013. 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2013/026066, Apr. 17, 2013, 8 pages. |
Parkhutik, Vitali, et al., The Role of Hydrogen in the Formation of Porous Structures in Silicon, Materials Science & Engineering, 1999, B58, 95-99, Elsevier Science, S.A. |
Dacquay, Bruno, Intraocular Pressure Sensor, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/434,709, filed May 4, 2009, 566 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew J.A., Lumen Clearing Valve for Glaucoma Drainage Device, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,043, filed Oct. 30, 2009, 1507 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew, Intraocular Pressure Sensor with External Pressure Compensation, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,244, filed Sep. 21, 2009, 562 pages. |
Dos Santos, Cesario, Power Generator for Glaucoma Drainage Device, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,772, filed Jan. 12, 2010, 517 pages. |
Dacquay, Bruno, Closed Loop Glaucoma Drug Delivery System, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/109,155, filed May 17, 2011, 238 pages. |
Field, Leslie, Active Drainage Systems with Pressure-Driven Valves and Electronically-Driven Pump, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/315,329, filed Dec. 9, 2011, 1620 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew J.A., Power Saving Glaucoma Drainage Device, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 12/837,803, filed Jul. 16, 2010, 1725 pages. |
Dos Santos, Cecario P., Multilayer Membrane Actuators, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/315,905, filed Dec. 9, 2011, 1652 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew, Intraocular Pressure Sensor with External Pressure Compensation, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 14/267,443, filed May 1, 2014, 53 pages. |
Rickard, Matthew, Intraocular Pressure Sensor with External Pressure Compensation, Prosecution History, U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,907, filed Aug. 3, 2012, 1652 pages. |
Barton, Keith, et al., “The Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study,” Journal of Ophthalmology, Jul. 15, 2010, vol. 118, No. 3, Elsevier, Inc., USA. |
International Searching Authority, Search Report of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/057261, Jan. 23, 2013, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/057261, Jan. 23, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/US2014/039582, Oct. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion, PCT/US2014/039582, Oct. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
Mokwa et al., “Mircro-Transponder Systems for Medical Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 50, No. 6, Dec. 2001, 5 pgs. |
International Searching Authority, Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2013/074113, Apr. 18, 2014, 10 pages. |
Driot et al.; “Ocular pharmacokinetics of fluocinolone acetonide after RetisertTM intravitreal implantation in rabbits over a 1-year period”; J. Ocular Pharm; 20; 3; 2004, pp. 269-275. |
Glybina et al.; “Neuroprotective properties of fluocinolone acetonide chronically delivered into the vitreous of albino RCS rats”; IVOS; 47; 2006; ARVO e-Abstract 1028. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140172090 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61737959 | Dec 2012 | US |