Ossicular transducer attachment for an implantable hearing device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6171229
  • Patent Number
    6,171,229
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 7, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 9, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
An implantable hearing aid transducer is easily mounted within a middle ear region by the force of attraction between two permanent magnets. The transducer is preferably coupled to one of the magnets prior to implantation. The transducer is coupled to the magnet by an adhesive, by a transducer case containing both the magnet and the transducer, or by being encompassed by the magnet.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to methods and apparatus for mounting transducers within a middle ear for use with an implantable hearing system.




BACKGROUND




In an implantable hearing aid system, transducers within the middle ear engage an auditory element and transduce from electrical signals into mechanical vibrations, and vice versa. Middle ear hearing aid systems are not as susceptible to mechanical feedback as other types of systems. Such implantable hearing aid systems are more comfortable for the patient than other types of hearing aids, such as those placed directly in the external auditory canal.




Transducers which contact an auditory element, such as one of the elements of the ossicular chain, require reliable disposition within the middle ear. Some disposition methods mechanically affix transducers to elements of the ossicular chain, e.g. mechanical fasteners, such as screws; metal hooks or bands; a constant force alone; or adhesives mount the transducer to an auditory element. Once implanted using such methods, transducers are not easily removed for adjustments and repairs.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An implantable hearing system transducer is easily mounted within a middle ear region with permanent magnets. In one embodiment, two half-ring magnets encompass the ossicular chain (e.g., preferably the long arm of the incus) to secure the transducer within the middle ear. The transducer can be mounted to one of the magnets prior to implantation. During surgery, the other magnet is permanently or temporarily tacked to the ossicular chain. Then, the magnet with the transducer is placed on the opposite side of the bone, such that it is magnetically attracted to the tacked magnet. If the transducer is not already mated to one magnet prior to surgery, it is attached to the magnet. The attraction between the magnets affixes the transducer to the bone. This invention is advantageous because permanent magnets are easy to use and can be easily removed for adjustments and repair. In further embodiments, the two permanent magnets are shaped, such that they lock around the ossicular chain.




In another embodiment, a “U”-shaped magnet and a transducer case encompass the ossicular chain (preferably the long arm of the incus) to secure a transducer within the middle ear. The transducer and a second magnet (any shape) are mounted within the transducer case. The magnet within the transducer case is magnetically attracted to the free magnet, locking the two magnets around the auditory element. Adhesives, or other fasteners suitable for the biological environment, are not required to affix the transducer to the magnet in this embodiment.




In yet another embodiment, an output transducer is magnetically-attached to the stapes within the middle ear region. The output transducer is encased in a transducer case, which lies in the same plane as the stirrup-shaped stapes. A multiple-prong magnet affixes the stapes to the transducer case. A magnet within the transducer case magnetically attracts the multiple-prong magnet, holding the transducer case against the stapes.




In yet another embodiment, a notch in a permanent magnet or a transducer binds the two together, affixing the transducer to the ossicular chain. In a further embodiment, the magnet, which attaches to the transducer, is wrapped around the transducer to keep it in place. In these embodiments, adhesives or magnets attaching the transducer case to the second permanent magnet are not required.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1A & 1B

are schematic diagrams of one embodiment, in which two half-ring permanent magnets support a transducer case on the long arm of the incus.





FIG. 1C

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which two half-ring permanent magnets support a transducer case on the stapes.





FIG. 1D

is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention shown in

FIG. 1C

, in which the incus is removed.





FIG. 1E

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which two half-ring permanent magnets support a transducer case on the malleus.





FIG. 1F

is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention shown in

FIG. 1E

, in which the incus is removed.





FIG. 1G

is a side view of a further embodiment of t he permanent magnets shown in FIG.


1


A.





FIG. 1H

is a side view of a further embodiment of the permanent magnets shown in FIG.


1


B.





FIGS. 2A & 2B

are schematic diagrams of another embodiment, in which a “U”-shaped magnet supports a transducer case, containing a second magnet, on the long arm of the incus.





FIG. 2C

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which a “U”-shaped magnet supports a transducer case, containing a second magnet, on the stapes.





FIG. 2D

is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention shown in

FIG. 2C

, in which the incus is removed.





FIG. 2E

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which a “U”-shaped magnet supports a transducer case, containing a second magnet, on the malleus.





FIG. 2F

is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention shown in

FIG. 2E

, in which the incus is removed.





FIG. 3A

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which a multiple-prong magnet supports a transducer case, containing a second magnet, on the stapes.





FIG. 3B

is a side view of the invention shown in

FIG. 3A

, taken along the plane B—B.





FIG. 3C

is a side view of the invention shown in

FIG. 3A

, taken along the plane A—A.





FIGS. 4A & 4B

are schematic diagrams of another embodiment, in which the transducer case is affixed between two permanent magnets and the long arm of the incus.





FIG. 4C

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which the transducer case is affixed between two permanent magnets and the stapes.





FIG. 4D

is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention shown in

FIG. 4C

, in which the incus is removed.





FIG. 4E

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which the transducer case is affixed between two permanent magnets and the malleus.





FIG. 4F

is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention shown in

FIG. 4E

, in which the incus is removed.





FIG. 5A

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment, in which the transducer case is affixed to the stapes with a plurality of magnets, having respective interlocking pegs and slots.





FIG. 5B

is a side view of the first permanent magnet shown in FIG.


5


A.





FIG. 5C

is a side view of one of the two second permanent magnets shown in FIG.


5


A.





FIG. 5D

is a top view of one of the two second permanent magnets shown in FIG.


5


A.





FIG. 5E

is a plan view of the ossicular transducer attachment shown in

FIG. 5A

, taken along the plane C—C.





FIG. 5F

is a side view of a further embodiment of the second permanent magnets shown in FIG.


5


A.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The invention provides a transducer support, which is particularly advantageous when used in an implantable hearing system, such as a partial middle ear implantable (P-MEI) or total middle ear implantable (T-MEI) hearing aid system, or other hearing system such as a cochlear implant with middle ear vibration sensing. A P-MEI or T-MEI hearing aid system assists the human auditory system in converting acoustic energy contained within sound waves into electrochemical signals delivered to the brain and interpreted as sound.

FIG. 1

A illustrates generally the use of the invention in a human auditory system. Sound waves are directed into an external auditory canal


20


by an outer ear (pinna)


25


. The frequency characteristics of the sound waves are slightly modified by the resonant characteristics of the external auditory canal


20


. These sound waves impinge upon the tympanic membrane (eardrum)


30


, interposed at the terminus of the external auditory canal, between it and the tympanic cavity (middle ear)


35


. Variations in the sound waves produce tympanic vibrations. The mechanical energy of the tympanic vibrations is communicated to the inner ear, comprising cochlea


60


, vestibule


61


, and semicircular canals


62


, by a sequence of articulating bones located in the middle ear


35


. This sequence of articulating bones is referred to generally as the ossicular chain. Thus, the tympanic membrane


30


and ossicular chain transform acoustic energy in the external auditory canal


20


to mechanical energy at the cochlea


60


.




The ossicular chain includes three primary components: a malleus


40


, an incus


45


, and a stapes


50


. The malleus


40


includes manubrium and head portions. The manubrium of the malleus


40


attaches to the tympanic membrane


30


. The head of the malleus


40


articulates with one end of the incus


45


. The incus


45


normally couples mechanical energy from the vibrating malleus


40


to the stapes


50


. The stapes


50


includes a capitulum portion, comprising a head and a neck, connected to a footplate portion by means of a support crus comprising two crura. The stapes


50


is disposed in and against a membrane-covered opening on the cochlea


60


. This membrane-covered opening between the cochlea


60


and middle ear


35


is referred to as the oval window


55


. Oval window


55


is considered part of cochlea


60


in this patent application. The incus


45


articulates the capitulum of the stapes


50


to complete the mechanical transmission path.




Normally, prior to implantation of the invention, tympanic vibrations are mechanically conducted through the malleus


40


, incus


45


, and stapes


50


, to the oval window


55


. Vibrations at the oval window


55


are conducted into the fluid-filled cochlea


60


. These mechanical vibrations generate fluidic motion, thereby transmitting hydraulic energy within the cochlea


60


. Pressures generated in the cochlea


60


by fluidic motion are accommodated by a second membrane-covered opening on the cochlea


60


. This second membrane-covered opening between the cochlea


60


and middle ear


35


is referred to as the round window


65


. Round window


65


is considered part of cochlea


60


in this patent application. Receptor cells in the cochlea


60


translate the fluidic motion into neural impulses which are transmitted to the brain and perceived as sound. However, various disorders of the tympanic membrane


30


, ossicular chain elements


40


,


45


, and


50


, and/or the cochlea


60


can disrupt or impair normal hearing.




Hearing loss due to damage in the cochlea is referred to as sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing loss due to an inability to conduct mechanical vibrations through the middle ear is referred to as conductive hearing loss. Some patients have an ossicular chain lacking sufficient resiliency to transmit mechanical vibrations between the tympanic membrane


30


and the oval window


55


. As a result, fluidic motion in the cochlea


60


is attenuated. Thus, receptor cells in the cochlea


60


do not receive adequate mechanical stimulation. Damaged elements of ossicular chain may also interrupt transmission of mechanical vibrations between the tympanic membrane


30


and the oval window


55


.




Various techniques have been developed to remedy hearing loss resulting from conductive or sensorineural hearing disorder. For example, tympanoplasty is used to surgically reconstruct the tympanic membrane


30


and establish ossicular continuity from the tympanic membrane


30


to the oval window


55


. Various passive mechanical prostheses and implantation techniques have been developed in connection with reconstructive surgery of the middle ear


35


for patients with damaged ossicles. Two basic forms of prosthesis are available: total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP), which is connected between the tympanic membrane


30


and the oval window


55


; and partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP), which is positioned between the tympanic membrane


30


and the stapes


50


.




Various types of hearing aids have been developed to compensate for hearing disorders. A conventional “air conduction” hearing aid is sometimes used to overcome hearing loss due to sensorineural cochlear damage or mild conductive impediments to the ossicular chain. Conventional hearing aids utilize a microphone, which transduces sound into an electrical signal. Amplification circuitry amplifies the electrical signal. A speaker transduces the amplified electrical signal into acoustic energy transmitted to the tympanic membrane


30


. However, some of the transmitted acoustic energy is typically detected by the microphone, resulting in a feedback signal which degrades sound quality. Conventional hearing aids also often suffer from a significant amount of signal distortion.




Implantable hearing aid systems have also been developed, utilizing various approaches to compensate for hearing disorders. For example, cochlear implant techniques implement an inner ear hearing aid system. Cochlear implants electrically stimulate auditory nerve fibers within the cochlea


60


. A typical cochlear implant system includes an external microphone, an external signal processor, and an external transmitter, as well as an implanted receiver and an implanted single channel or multichannel probe. A single channel probe has one electrode. A multichannel probe has an array of several electrodes. In the more advanced multichannel cochlear implant, a signal processor converts speech signals transduced by the microphone into a series of sequential electrical pulses of different frequency bands within a speech frequency spectrum. Electrical pulses corresponding to low frequency sounds are delivered to electrodes that are more apical in the cochlea


60


. Electrical pulses corresponding to high frequency sounds are delivered to electrodes that are more basal in the cochlea


60


. The nerve fibers stimulated by the electrodes of the cochlear implant probe transmit neural impulses to the brain, where these neural impulses are interpreted as sound.




Other inner ear hearing aid systems have been developed to aid patients without an intact tympanic membrane


30


, upon which “air conduction” hearing aids depend. For example, temporal bone conduction hearing aid systems produce mechanical vibrations that are coupled to the cochlea


60


via a temporal bone in the skull. In such temporal bone conduction hearing aid systems, a vibrating element can be implemented percutaneously or subcutaneously.




A particularly interesting class of hearing aid systems includes those which are configured for disposition principally within the middle ear


35


space. In middle ear implantable (MEI) hearing aids, an electrical-to-mechanical output transducer couples mechanical vibrations to the ossicular chain, which is optionally interrupted to allow coupling of the mechanical vibrations to the ossicular chain. Both electromagnetic and piezoelectric output transducers have been used to effect the mechanical vibrations upon the ossicular chain.




One example of a partial middle ear implantable (P-MEI) hearing aid system having an electromagnetic output transducer comprises: an external microphone transducing sound into electrical signals; external amplification and modulation circuitry; and an external radio frequency (RF) transmitter for transdermal RF communication of an electrical signal. An implanted receiver detects and rectifies the transmitted signal, driving an implanted coil in constant current mode. A resulting magnetic field from the implanted drive coil vibrates an implanted magnet that is permanently affixed only to the incus


45


. Such electromagnetic output transducers have relatively high power consumption, which limits their usefulness in total middle ear implantable (T-MEI) hearing aid systems.




A piezoelectric output transducer is also capable of effecting mechanical vibrations to the ossicular chain. An example of such a device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,729,366, issued to D. W. Schaefer on Mar. 8, 1988. In the '366 patent, a mechanical-to-electrical piezoelectric input transducer is associated with the malleus


40


, transducing mechanical energy into an electrical signal, which is amplified and further processed. A resulting electrical signal is provided to an electrical-to-mechanical piezoelectric output transducer that generates a mechanical vibration coupled to an element of the ossicular chain or to the oval window


55


or round window


65


. In the '366 patent, the ossicular chain is interrupted by removal of the incus


45


. Removal of the incus


45


prevents the mechanical vibrations delivered by the piezoelectric output transducer from mechanically feeding back to the piezoelectric input transducer.




Piezoelectric output transducers have several advantages over electromagnetic output transducers. The smaller size or volume of the piezoelectric output transducer advantageously eases implantation into the middle ear


35


. The lower power consumption of the piezoelectric output transducer is particularly attractive for T-MEI hearing aid systems, which include a limited longevity implanted battery as a power source.




For implantation of hearing aid components, an access hole


85


is created in a region of the temporal bone known as the mastoid


80


. An incision is made in the skin covering the mastoid


80


, and an underlying access hole


85


is created through the mastoid


80


allowing external access to the middle ear


35


. The access hole


85


is located approximately posterior and superior to the external auditory canal


20


. The transducers are implanted through the access hole


35


, along with magnets


105


and


110


, which couple the transducers to the auditory element


40


,


45


,


50


. The electronics unit


100


of the IHA is separately implanted. This eases implantation and repair or adjustment to the electronics unit


100


of the IHA. Repairs, such as changing a battery in the electronics unit


100


of the IHA, are easily made without removing the transducers.





FIG. 1A

illustrates ossicular chain elements within a middle ear region


35


, in which one embodiment of the invention supports a transducer on one of the ossicular chain elements, the long arm of the incus


45


, but the transducer can also be attached at other locations than that shown. In general, for illustration purposes, transducer placement is shown on a particular ossicle


40


,


45


,


50


, but may have several potential placements along the ossicular chain. A first, half ring-shaped permanent magnet


105


is permanently or temporarily tacked to the long arm of the incus


45


during surgery. It is preferable to permanently tack the magnet


105


to the long arm of the incus


45


, with a biocompatible adhesive, so as to add further stability to the ossicular transducer attachment. Biocompatible adhesives comprise, among others, ultraviolet-cured epoxies, two-part epoxies, silicone adhesives, dental adhesives, acrylic methacrylate, and urethane methacrylate. A conformable material can be used to ensure a customized fit between the ossicular chain


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




A transducer case


115


is coupled to a second, half ring-shaped permanent magnet


110


. The transducer is hermetically-sealed within the transducer case


115


, which comprises a biocompatible material, such as titanium or stainless steel. Then, the second permanent magnet


110


, coupled with the transducer case


115


, is placed opposite the first permanent magnet


105


, such that the two magnets


105


and


110


encircle the long arm of the incus


45


, as shown in FIG.


1


B. However, the transducer does not always need to be encased in a transducer case


115


. For example, a transducer case


115


is not needed when a coated polyvinylidene fluoride transducer is used. Furthermore, it is not necessary that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


actually contact one another. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the long arm of the incus


45


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 1C

, the transducer case


115


and second permanent magnet


110


are magnetically-coupled to the first permanent magnet


105


, encircling the crura of the stapes


50


member of the ossicular chain. In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 1D

, the incus


45


is removed to decrease mechanical feedback between the malleus


40


and the stapes


50


. It is not necessary that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


actually contact one another. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the stapes


50


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 1

E, the transducer case


115


and second permanent magnet


110


are magnetically-coupled to the first permanent magnet


105


, encircling the neck portion of the malleus


40


member of the ossicular chain. In an even further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 1F

, the incus


45


is removed to decrease mechanical feedback between the malleus


40


and the stapes


50


. It is not necessary that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


actually contact one another. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the neck portion of the malleus


40


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In further embodiments of the invention, two locking permanent magnets


105


and


110


are used to further maintain the force of attraction and position between the two magnets l


05


and


110


encircling the ossicular chain. For example, as shown in

FIG. 1

G, tubes


140


and respective slots


145


on mating ends of opposite magnets


105


,


110


interlock around the ossicular chain. In an alternate embodiment, rounded knobs


150


and respective slots


155


on mating ends of opposite magnets


105


,


110


interlock around the ossicular chain. In these embodiments, the magnets


105


and


110


also need not fully lock, so as to add further stability to the attachment.




In a second embodiment of the invention, as shown in

FIGS. 2A and 2B

, a transducer is coupled to the long arm of the incus


45


within the middle ear region


35


. A first, “U”-shaped permanent magnet


105


is permanently or temporarily tacked to the long arm of the incus


45


during implantation surgery. It is preferable to permanently tack the magnet


105


to the long arm of the incus


45


, with a biocompatible adhesive, so as to add further stability to the ossicular transducer attachment. A conformable material can be used to ensure a customized fit between the ossicular chain


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




A second permanent magnet


110


is hermetically-sealed in a transducer case


115


along with a transducer (not shown). The transducer case


115


comprises a biocompatible material, such as titanium or stainless steel. The shape of the second permanent magnet


110


is not critical to the invention. The primary concern, however, is that portions of the second permanent magnet


110


are magnetically-disposed opposite portions of the “U”-shaped first permanent magnet


105


to provide sufficient magnetic force to hold the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


together. Then, the transducer case


115


is placed opposite the free ends of the first permanent magnet


105


, such that the two magnets


105


and


110


are magnetically-coupled around the long arm of the incus


45


, as shown in FIG.


2


B. In another embodiment, the second permanent magnet


110


can comprise a ferromagnetic inner lining for the transducer case


115


, instead of being shaped as a block magnet. It is not necessary that the first permanent magnet


105


actually contacts the transducer case


115


, which contains the second permanent magnet


110


. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the long arm of the incus


45


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 2C

, the transducer case


115


containing the second permanent magnet


110


is magnetically-coupled to the first permanent magnet


105


, encircling the crura of the stapes


50


member of the ossicular chain. In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 2D

, the incus


45


is removed to decrease mechanical feedback between the malleus


40


and the stapes


50


. It is not necessary that the first permanent magnet


105


actually contacts the transducer case


115


. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the crura of the stapes


50


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the first permanent magnet


105


and the transducer case


115


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together.




In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 2E

, the transducer case


115


containing the second permanent magnet


110


is magnetically-coupled to the first permanent magnet


105


, encircling the neck portion of the malleus


40


member of the ossicular chain. In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 2F

, the incus


45


is removed to decrease feedback between the malleus


40


and the stapes


50


. It is not necessary that the first permanent magnet


105


actually contacts the transducer case


115


. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the neck portion of the malleus


40


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In another embodiment, as shown in

FIGS. 3A

,


3


B, and


3


C, a transducer case


115


is mounted to the crura of the stapes


50


. The first permanent magnet


115


comprises a multiple-prong permanent magnet


115


, preferably having three prongs. The transducer case


115


contains a transducer (not shown) and a second permanent magnet


110


. The shape of the second permanent magnet


110


is not critical to the invention. The primary concern, however, is that portions of the second permanent magnet


110


are magnetically-disposed opposite the multiple prongs of the first permanent magnet


105


. Then, the transducer case


115


is placed opposite the multiple prongs of the first permanent magnet


105


, such that the two magnets


105


and


110


are magnetically-coupled around the crura of the stapes


50


, as shown in FIG.


3


A. The transducer case


115


lies in a parallel plane with the stapes


50


and can be disposed on either side of the stapes


50


. In another embodiment, the second permanent magnet


110


can comprise a ferromagnetic inner lining for the transducer case


115


, instead of being shaped as a block magnet.




In another embodiment, as shown in

FIGS. 4A and 4B

, a the second permanent magnet


110


is wrapped around a transducer case


115


. The transducer case


115


houses a transducer (not shown). The second permanent magnet


110


is magnetically-coupled to a first permanent magnet


105


, encircling the long arm of the incus


45


. In this embodiment, the transducer case


115


is attached to the second permanent magnet


110


prior to implantation without using adhesives or requiring that the second permanent magnet


110


be placed within the transducer case


115


. This enables joining of the second permanent magnet


110


and the transducer case


115


under more ideal conditions than those existing during the implantation procedure. A notch is placed on either the second permanent magnet


110


or the transducer case


115


, which fits into the other piece, to prevent separation.




It is not necessary that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


actually contact one another. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the long arm of the incus


45


, without the notch becoming uncoupled. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 4C

, the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


encircle the crura of the stapes


50


. In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 4D

, the incus


45


is removed to prevent mechanical feedback between the malleus


40


and the stapes


50


. It is not necessary that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


actually contact one another. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the crura of the stapes


50


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In another further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 4E

, the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


encircle the neck portion of the malleus


40


. In yet a further embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 4F

, the incus


45


is removed to prevent mechanical feedback between the malleus


40


and the stapes


50


. It is not necessary that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


actually contact one another. It is sufficient for the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


to act on each other with a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the neck portion of the malleus


40


. Since it is required that there be a close fit between the magnet


105


,


110


and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, it is preferable that the two permanent magnets


105


and


110


do not completely touch, so as to prevent movement once they are magnetically-coupled together and to ensure long-term compressive contact between the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and the permanent magnets


105


and


110


.




In further embodiments of the invention shown in

FIGS. 4A

to


4


F, two locking permanent magnets


105


and


110


are used to further maintain the force of attraction and position between the two magnets


105


and


110


encircling the ossicular chain and transducer case


115


. For example, as shown in

FIG. 1

G, tubes


140


and respective slots


145


on mating ends of opposite magnets


105


,


110


interlock around the ossicular chain. In an alternate embodiment, rounded knobs


150


and respective slots


155


on mating ends of opposite magnets


105


,


110


interlock around the ossicular chain. In these embodiments, the magnets


105


and


110


also need not fully lock, so as to add further stability to the attachment.




In another embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 5A

, a transducer case


115


is magnetically-coupled around the stapes


50


, without using adhesives or requiring that the second permanent magnet


110


be encased in the transducer case


115


, in order to attach the transducer case


115


to the second permanent magnet


110


. A notch


125


, as shown in

FIG. 5B

, is placed in the first permanent magnet


105


in order to fit around the stapes


50


. Two peg-shaped permanent magnets


110


, as shown in

FIGS. 5C and 5D

, or ball-shaped permanent magnets extend through the transducer case


115


, into slots


130


contained in the first permanent magnet


105


, as further shown in FIG.


5


E. It is not necessary that two peg-shaped permanent magnets


110


be used. The two peg-shaped permanent magnets


110


are replaced with a single block magnet


110


, having two posts


135


extending from one side in another embodiment, as shown in FIG.


5


F. In the embodiments shown in

FIGS. 5A

to


5


F, the transducer case


115


can be replaced with a piezoelectric film transducer, such as a polyvinylidene fluoride piezoelectric polymer sensor. The second permanent magnet(s)


110


can easily be pushed through punched holes in the film, without requiring a special transducer case


115


.




In all embodiments, the type of permanent magnets


105


and


110


used in this invention is not critical, as long as it provides a sufficient magnetic force to secure the transducer case


115


to the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


. Several different types of magnets provide adequate force to secure the transducer case


115


to the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


. For example, samarium-cobalt (SmCo


5


) and neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets work well. The magnets


105


and


110


should be coated with a biocompatible material prior to their placement within the middle ear


35


. In further embodiments, a flexible and/or conformable material is preformed on the contact surface of one or both of the magnets


105


and


110


. A flexible material, such as low-durometer silicone, is advantageous to use because it would hold the magnet


105


,


110


in place around the ossicular chain by conforming to the shape of the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and creating friction between the material and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


. A conformable material is advantageous to use because it would also conform to the shape of the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


, and create friction between the material and the ossicular chain element


40


,


45


,


50


. Certain types of material can also solidify after implantation, adding further stability to the ossicular attachment. However, the flexible and/or conformable material should always be biocompatible.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus adapted for mounting a transducer forming part of a hearing device to an ossicular element of a human ear by use of adhesive and magnetic fastener means comprising:a first permanent magnet having adhesive means for attachment of the magnet to an ossicular element; a second permanent magnet conformed to be spaced apart from and magnetically coupled to said first magnet, thereby cooperating with the first magnet to form a secure compressive magnetic band about the ossicular element; and a transducer, the transducer being a part of the hearing device, and being attachable to one of said first and said second magnets by one of either adhesive and magnetic fastener means for attaching the transducer, said transducer being hermetically sealed within a case.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein one of said first and said second magnets is integrated with said case of the transducer.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said adhesive means for attachment is a non-magnetic substance.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said second permanent magnet comprises a structure configured as a ferro-magnetic lining for the transducer case.
  • 5. An apparatus adapted for mounting a hearing device to an ossicular element of a human ear having a disarticulated ossicular chain, the apparatus comprising:a first permanent magnet attachable to [said remainder] an ossicular element; a second magnet conformed to be spaced apart from and magnetically coupled to said first permanent magnet, the first and second magnets thereby forming a secure compressive magnetic band about said remainder ossicular element; and an auditory vibrations transducer attached to one of said first and said second magnets by one of either adhesive and mechanical fasteners.
  • 6. A hearing aid apparatus including a transducer adapted for mounting to an ossicular chain element within a middle ear, the apparatus comprising:a first permanent magnet attachable to an ossicular element by adhesive means for attaching the magnet; a second permanent magnet spaced apart from and magnetically coupled to said first magnet, thereby forming a secure compressive magnetic band about the ossicular element; and a transducer attachable to one of said first and said second magnets by one of an adhesive and mechanical fasteners.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said first and said second magnets are structured as mating half rings spaced apart, said first and second magnets being remotely and magnetically coupled to provide a secure compressive magnetic band about the ossicular element.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the first magnet is U-shaped and is attachable to the ossicular element the adhesive means and wherein the transducer includes the second magnet integrated therewith, spaced apart and magnetically coupled to said U-shaped first magnet.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein one of said first and said second magnets comprises a multiple prong magnet to provide the secure compressive magnetic band about the ossicular element.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein one of said magnets is within a case of the transducer and further defines a notch in the case to further provide the secure magnetic band about the ossicular element.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the transducer is adapted for coupling to the second permanent magnet and is conformed to be magnetically secured between said first magnet and said second magnet, thereby adapted to be directly disposed against the ossicular element.
US Referenced Citations (26)
Number Name Date Kind
3557775 Mahoney Jan 1971
3594514 Wingrove Jul 1971
3712962 Epley Jan 1973
3764748 Branch et al. Oct 1973
3931648 Shea Jan 1976
4729366 Schaefer et al. Mar 1988
4774933 Hough et al. Oct 1988
4776322 Hough et al. Oct 1988
4817607 Tatge Apr 1989
4850962 Schaefer Jul 1989
4957478 Maniglia Sep 1990
5012520 Steeger Apr 1991
5015224 Maniglia May 1991
5015225 Hough et al. May 1991
5163957 Sade et al. Nov 1992
5277694 Leysieffer et al. Jan 1994
5282858 Bisch et al. Feb 1994
5338287 Miller et al. Aug 1994
5360388 Spindel et al. Nov 1994
5411467 Hortmann et al. May 1995
5456654 Ball Oct 1995
5498226 Lenkauskas Mar 1996
5531787 Lesinski et al. Jul 1996
5554096 Ball Sep 1996
5624376 Ball et al. Apr 1997
5800336 Ball et al. Sep 1998
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
“Middle Ear Implant: Implantable Hearing Aids”, Advances in Audiology, vol. 4, M. Hoke Series Editor, Karger, 1-169, (1988).
T. Dumon, et al., “Piezoelectric Middle Ear Implant: Experimental Results”, Abstract of Paper Presented at International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Walt Disney World Swan, Abstract #35, (Nov. 11-14, 1996).
J. M. Frederickson, et al., “Ongoing Investigations into an Implantable Electromagnetic Hearing Aid for Moderate to Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss”, Otolaryngological Clinics of North America, vol. 28, No. 1, 107-121, (Feb. 1995).
K. Gyo, et al., “Sound Pickup Utilizing an Implantable Piezpelectric Ceramic Bimorph Element: Application to the Cochlear Implant”, American Journal of Otology, vol. 5, No. 4, 273-276, (Apr. 1984).
K. Gyo, et al., “Stapes Vibration Produced by the Output Transducer of an Implantable Hearing Aid”, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., vol. 113, 1078-1081, (Oct. 1987).
G. Jako, “Biomedical Engineering in Ear Surgery”, Otolaryngological Clinics of North America, vol. 5, No. 1, 173-182, (Feb. 1972).
Wen H. Ko, et al., “Engineering Principles of Mechanical Stimulation of the Middle Ear”, Otolaryngological Clinics of North America, vol. 28, No. 1, 29-41, (Feb. 1995).
K. Kodera, et al., “Sound Evaluation of Partially Implantable Piezoelectric Middle Ear Implant: Comparative Study of Frequency Responses”, ENT Journal, vol. 73, No. 2, 108-111, (Feb. 1994).
A. J. Maniglia, et al., “A Contactless Electromagnetic Implantable Middle Ear Device for Sensorineural Hearing Loss”, ENT Journal, vol. 73, No. 2, 78-90, (Feb. 1994).
A. J. Maniglia, et al., “Contactless, Semi-Implantable Electromagnetic Hearing Device for the Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss”, Abstract of Paper Presented at International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Walt Disney World Swan, Abstract #28, (Nov. 11-14, 1993).
Jun-Ichi Suzuki, et al., “Long-Term Clinical Results of the Partially Implantable Piezoelectric Middle Ear Implant”, ENT Journal, vol. 73, No. 2, 104-107, (Feb. 1994).
M. Tos, et al., “Implantation of Electromagnetic Ossicular Replacement Device”, ENT Journal, vol. 73, No. 2, 93-103, (Feb. 1994).
D. B. Welling, et al., “Auditory Stimulation of the Inner Ear via the Semicircular Canals”, Abstract of paper presented at International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Walt Disney World Swan, Abstract #9, (Nov. 11-14, 1993).
N. Yanagihara, et al., “Partially Implantable Hearing Aid using Piezoelectric Ceramic Ossicular Vibrator”, Abstract of Paper Presented at International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Walt Disney World Swan, Abstract #26, (Nov. 11-14, 1993).