The present invention relates to instrumentation used in implantation of an osteochondral graft, more particularly, to a delivery device used in inserting the osteochondral graft in a previously prepared hole. The invention also relates to the use of the delivery device to implant an osteochondral graft.
The delivery device of the present invention can also be used or adapted for use with bone-only or cartilage-only grafts or grafts of other construction, including artificial grafts, such as non-tissue grafts made from metals and synthetic materials. The invention has particular utility in repairing localized damage to bone and cartilage, such as lesions and other defects in an articular surface of the knee or other weight-articulating joints.
The knee and other articulating joints are susceptible to lesions and other defects. These may be the result of injuries caused by friction between opposing bone surfaces. While treatment options for these injuries lie along a continuum of care culminating in joint replacement, one treatment option is to replace the osteochondral tissue at the site of the injury with a graft of healthy tissue. Typically, autografts or allografts are employed; however, xenografts and artificial grafts, as previously described, may be employed. The surgery to implant these grafts often can be conducted arthroscopically. For this and other reasons, graft implantation may be more desirable than joint replacement.
The procedure for implanting osteochondral grafts involves creating a recipient site by removing the localized defect. Typically, this is done by forming a hole of a desired diameter (or holes, potentially, depending on the size of the defect) at the site of the damage. The hole may be bored, punched, or curetted, etc. The excised hole is then filled with a replacement osteochondral graft having a diameter corresponding to the diameter of the hole. The typical graft is cylindrical in shape and consists of a layer of cartilage over a layer of bone. Depending on the size of the damage, multiple holes of the same or different diameters may be bored and filled. Generally, in such instances, one hole will be bored and then filled before an adjacent or even overlapping hole is bored and filled.
Varied instrumentation is required throughout the surgery, both for forming the hole and implanting the replacement graft. Certain instrumentation may be tailored to the specific implant diameter.
Due to the delicate nature of the implantation procedure, in that its ultimate purpose is to repair or replace the articular surface and restore normal function to the joint, the method by which the transplanted osteochondral graft is handled and introduced into the recipient site is of particular importance. A desirable delivery device would provide a means for securely holding onto the osteochondral graft so that it is not displaced from the delivery device prematurely while simultaneously avoiding damage to the osteochondral graft.
The present invention relates to instrumentation used in implantation of an osteochondral graft, more particularly, to a delivery device used in inserting the osteochondral graft in a previously prepared hole. The invention also relates to the use of the delivery device to implant an osteochondral graft.
The delivery device of the present invention can also be used or adapted for use with bone-only or cartilage-only grafts or grafts of other construction, including artificial grafts, such as non-tissue grafts made from metals and synthetic materials. The invention has particular utility in repairing localized damage to bone and cartilage, such as lesions and other defects in an articular surface of the knee or other weight-articulating joints.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a delivery device for an osteochondral graft. The delivery device has a tube, a plunger and a graft retention assembly. The tube comprises a bore, having an inside diameter, that extends from a proximal end to a distal end. The inside diameter of the bore is sufficient to accept an osteochondral graft of a desired diameter. A set of apertures are located adjacent the distal end of the tube. The plunger, slidably disposed within the bore of the tube, comprises a shaft having a proximal end, distal end, and distal tip. The graft retention assembly comprises a collar and a set of tabs, which are disposed within the apertures of the tube. The tabs are biased towards each other but are capable of being displaced away from each other to receive or release the osteochondral graft. The graft retention assembly may be attached to the tube at an annular recess located along an outside diameter of the tube proximal to the apertures by means of the collar.
The delivery device may further comprise a handle positioned at the proximal end of the tube, with the handle comprising a bore extending from a proximal end to a distal end, and the bore having an inside diameter at its distal end sufficient to accept an outside diameter of the proximal end of the tube. The handle may further comprise an annular recess located at the proximal end of its bore that can accommodate a pliable material providing frictional engagement with the shaft of the plunger.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a delivery device for an osteochondral graft comprising a tube, a plunger, a graft retention assembly, and a handle. The tube comprises a bore, having an inside diameter, that extends from a proximal end to a distal end. The inside diameter of bore is sufficient to accept an osteochondral graft of a desired diameter. A set of apertures are located adjacent the distal end of the tube, and an annular recess is located along an outside diameter of the tube proximal to the apertures.
The plunger, slidably disposed within the bore of the tube, comprises a shaft having a proximal end, distal end, and distal tip. The plunger has a handle positioned at its proximal end. The plunger also has a stepped-down section of reduced relative diameter located proximal to the distal tip of the plunger shaft.
The graft retention assembly comprises a collar and a set of tabs, which are disposed within the apertures of the tube. The tabs are biased towards each other but are capable of being displaced away from each other to receive or release the osteochondral graft. The graft retention assembly is attached to the tube at the annular recess by means of the collar. Movement of the shaft of the plunger distally within the tube causes the tabs of the graft retention assembly to be displaced away from each other.
The handle, positioned at the proximal end of the tube, comprises a bore extending from a proximal end to a distal end. The bore has an inside diameter at its distal end sufficient to accept an outside diameter of the proximal end of the tube. The handle also has an annular recess located at the proximal end of its bore that can accommodate a pliable material providing frictional engagement with the shaft of the plunger.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of implanting an osteochondral graft to a recipient site using a delivery device of the present invention. The method comprises loading the osteochondral graft into the device by inserting the distal tip of the plunger into the proximal end of the tube, moving the plunger distally in the bore of the tube until the distal tip of the plunger engages the first protrusion causing the tabs of the graft retention assembly to be displaced away from each other, and inserting the osteochondral graft into the distal end of the tube. The plunger is then moved distally in the bore of the tube further until the first protrusion no longer engages the distal tip of the plunger and the first protrusion engages the stepped-down section of the plunger, causing the tabs of the graft retention assembly to move inwardly and come in contact with and secure the osteochondral graft. To implant the osteochondral graft, the delivery device with an adjacent osteochondral graft is positioned adjacent the recipient site. The osteochondral graft is delivered by moving the plunger distally in the bore of the tube further to extrude the osteochondral graft from the delivery device.
The features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are within the spirit of the invention.
These drawings illustrate certain aspects of some of the embodiments of the present invention, and should not be used to limit or define the invention.
The present invention relates to instrumentation used in implantation of an osteochondral graft, more particularly, to a delivery device used in inserting the osteochondral graft in a previously prepared hole. The invention also relates to the use of the delivery device to implant an osteochondral graft. The invention has particular utility in repairing localized damage to bone and cartilage, such as lesions and other defects in an articular surface of the knee or other weight-articulating joints.
The delivery device of the present invention can be used for the implantation of grafts from various locations and sources. The delivery device of the present invention can be used or adapted for use with osteochondral grafts, bone-only grafts, or cartilage-only grafts, as well as grafts of other construction, including artificial grafts, such as non-tissue grafts made from metals and synthetic materials. Similarly, the device of the present invention can be used or adapted for use with autografts, allografts, and xenografts. The preferred use of the delivery device is for the implantation of osteochondral allografts.
The delivery device of the present invention provides a means for securely holding onto the osteochondral graft so that it is not displaced from the delivery device prematurely while simultaneously avoiding damage to the osteochondral graft.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, the delivery device generally includes the following components: a tube, a plunger, a handle, and a graft retention assembly.
In the descriptions of these components that follow, various preferences for materials of construction are generally expressed. Typically, polymeric materials or stainless steel are employed. The use of other materials of construction for the components, beyond any expressed preferences, is within the scope of the present invention. Generally, any materials of construction can be used for a component as long as the function of the component is not defeated and the material of construction is considered acceptable for a surgical environment.
Similarly, in the descriptions of the components that follow, various preferences regarding whether a component is transparent, translucent, or opaque may be expressed. Notwithstanding any such expressed preferences, the optical properties of a component may be varied as long as the function of the component is not defeated and the optical properties are considered acceptable for the intended surgical environment.
It is contemplated that the delivery device of the present invention may be fabricated in various sizes to accommodate osteochondral grafts of different diameters. In some embodiments, an indicator of the delivery device to be used with an osteochondral graft of a given diameter is provided. In particularly preferred embodiments, the indicator includes a marking in the form of color-coding associated with the delivery device corresponding to a particular osteochondral graft diameter. Preferably, any other instruments within a surgical set that are tailored for use with the same osteochondral graft diameter will have similar markings.
Referring generally to
The inside diameter 25 (corresponding to inside surface 35) of bore 34 is desirably constant from proximal end 31 to distal end 32. The outside diameter 23 (corresponding to outside surface 33) of tube 30 may also be substantially constant from proximal end 31 to distal end 32. However, in various embodiments, outside surface 33 of tube 30 may have an area of reduced diameter, such as in the form of an annular recess 37 or a step. Annular recess 37 is described further in the context of apertures 38 and graft retention assembly. In various embodiments, the outer surface 33 of tube 30 may taper down toward distal end 32, for example, to achieve an area of reduced wall thickness at the distal tip 36. In certain embodiments, a 1 mm wall thickness is preferred at distal tip 36.
Located on the distal end of tube 30, proximal to distal tip 36 (between distal tip 36 and annular recess 37, when present) are apertures 38 for accommodating descending tabs of the graft retention assembly. Preferably, a set of, preferably two, apertures 38 in the form of opposing cutout panes or windows are formed in the tube 30. In alternative embodiments, a single aperture may be employed. Preferably, apertures 38 terminate distally short of distal tip 36, such that distal tip 36 exists in the form of a continuous annular surface.
Referring generally to
Desirably, the diameter of shaft 41 at distal tip 44 of distal end 43 substantially corresponds to the diameter of osteochondral graft. Among other benefits, this correspondence in diameter minimizes the likelihood of damage to osteochondral graft. Proximal to distal tip 44, shaft 41 has a stepped-down section 45 with a diameter smaller than that of the diameter of shaft 41 at distal tip 44. As will be described further in the context of graft retention assembly, stepped-down section 45 facilitates interaction between shaft 41 and graft retention assembly. Preferably, chamfers are provided where sections of shaft 41 having different diameters meet. In various embodiments, distal tip 44 desirably has a mating surface 46 adapted to engage osteochondral graft that is concave. In such embodiments, the concavity is preferably about 1 mm. In other embodiments, the mating surface 46 may have no curvature or may be convex.
Desirably, plunger 40 has a plunger handle 47 positioned at the proximal end 42 of shaft 41 to provide a means for gripping and depressing plunger 40. In preferred embodiments, plunger handle 47 is in the form of an enlarged button or other shape that serves as a stop against further distal movement of plunger 40. The plunger handle 47 may have an impacting surface adapted for manual depressing of the plunger 40 or for the use of a surgical hammer, mallet, or other instrument in mechanically depressing the plunger 40. The length of the plunger 40 can be tailored to achieve a desired osteochondral graft insertion depth. For example, plunger 40 can be tailored such that when it is fully depressed, the distal tip 44 may be retracted from, flush with, or extend past distal tip 36 of tube 30. For example, in certain embodiments, it may be desirable for plunger 40, when fully depressed, to remain from about 1 mm to about 2 mm retracted from distal tip 36 of tube 30. In use, this results in an implanted osteochondral graft that is about 1 mm to about 2 mm proud in the recipient hole.
Referring generally to
Referring generally to
The delivery device 10 also has a graft retention assembly adapted for attachment to tube 30. In various embodiments, such as depicted in
Tabs 95 are biased, i.e., bent, towards each other when in a relaxed state but are capable of being expanded outwardly to receive and release the osteochondral graft. Desirably, the tabs 95 are bent equally from the points where they connect to the collar 92. In preferred embodiments, the extent of the bending is such that the protrusions 98 are a distance apart which is between 50-100% of the given graft diameter. Once osteochondral graft is positioned between tabs 95 and the force causing tabs 95 to expand is removed, the tabs 95 will move towards each other once again, coming in contact with and securing osteochondral graft. Preferably, the pressure exerted by the tabs 95 on the osteochondral graft is such that the tabs 95 provide enough static friction with the osteochondral graft so that it is not able to exit the delivery device 10 without the aid of the plunger 40 or other means. However, the force exerted by the tabs 95 should also not damage the osteochondral graft.
The expansion of tabs 95 to accept osteochondral graft and the subsequent inward movement of tabs 95 to secure osteochondral graft is the result of movement of shaft 41 of plunger 40 distally within tube 30. To facilitate the outward and inward movement of tabs 95, an inward facing first protrusion 97 is positioned on one or more of tabs 95. Preferably, an inward facing first protrusion 97 is positioned on each of tabs 95. First protrusion 97 is positioned proximal to distal tip 96. Preferably, first protrusion 97 is positioned half-way along the length of tabs 95.
As plunger 40 is depressed, distal tip 44 of shaft 41 first comes in contact with first protrusion 97, causing expansion of tabs 95 and facilitating insertion of osteochondral graft without risk of damage. Once the osteochondral graft has been inserted, plunger 40 is depressed further so that the first protrusion 97 engages the reduced diameter region of stepped-down section 45. First protrusion 97, depending upon the extent of the bending of tabs 95, may or may not actually come into physical contact with the shaft 41 of plunger 40 within the stepped-down section 45. At this point, tabs 95 will move towards each other once again, coming in contact with and securing osteochondral graft. In use, osteochondral graft is desirably secured within delivery device 10 with some portion of the graft extending beyond distal tip 36 of tube 30. This facilitates implantation of osteochondral graft in the previously prepared hole. For a desirable osteochondral graft having a length of about 10 mm, the graft, inserted and secured in the delivery device, extends desirably from about 0.5 mm to about 2 mm beyond distal tip 36 of tube 30, preferably about 2 mm beyond distal tip 36 of tube 30.
Due to the need for inward and outward movement of opposing fingers 95, spring tab assembly 90, and particularly opposing fingers 95, is preferably formed from stainless steel and is heat set in a bent state with opposing fingers 95 biased towards each other. In alternative embodiments, spring-biased polymeric materials or other biocompatible metals with appropriate flexibility may be employed. Other shape-memory materials may be employed.
In preferred embodiments of delivery device 10, an inward facing second protrusion 98 is positioned at or in proximity to distal tip 96 of one or more of tabs 95. Preferably, an inward facing second protrusion 98 is positioned on each of tabs 95. Second protrusion 98 facilitates gripping of osteochondral graft and reduces the likelihood of damaging osteochondral graft. A radius edge is desirably applied to the edges of the second protrusion 98 to further reduce the likelihood of damaging osteochondral graft. Desirably, a radius edge is applied to all the edges of the spring tab assembly 90. In various embodiments, a radius edge of about 1 mm is desirably employed on all edges of the spring tab assembly 90.
Having described the components of the delivery device 10, its use for implanting an osteochondral graft in a previously prepared hole is readily apparent but is described now in greater detail.
The distal tip 44 of plunger 40 is inserted into the proximal end 31 of tube 30 and moved distally within tube 30 until distal tip 44 engages first protrusion 97 of spring clip assembly 90. This causes the outward expansion of tabs 95. With tabs 95 now spread apart, a osteochondral graft is inserted, cartilage end first, into the distal end 32 of tube 30. Desirably, the osteochondral graft is left extending, preferably from about 1 mm to 2 mm, beyond distal tip 36 of tube 30.
The plunger 40 is now depressed further until first protrusion 97 is no longer in contact with the larger diameter of distal tip 44 of plunger 40. With first protrusion 97 now engaged with the reduced diameter region of stepped-down section 45, tabs 95 move towards each other, with distal tip 96, including second protrusion 98, if present, of tabs 95 coming in contact with and securing the osteochondral graft.
The delivery device 10 and the osteochondral graft are now ready to be used to implant the osteochondral graft into the recipient site, i.e., previously-prepared hole. In various embodiments of the present invention, the delivery device 10 may be used with a cannulated delivery guide that has a bore with an inside diameter sized to accommodate slidable passage of the delivery device 10. The delivery guide will preferably be made of a polymeric material but other materials of construction are contemplated. Similarly, the delivery guide may be transparent, translucent, or opaque. The delivery guide may be used to retract soft tissues (e.g., the naturally occurring fat pad) between the surgical incision or arthroscopic portal and the recipient site. In some embodiments, the delivery guide will generally be prepositioned over the prepared recipient site.
With or without the delivery guide, the delivery device 10 is positioned directly above, and preferably in contact with, the recipient site. The osteochondral graft is extruded from the delivery device 10 by depressing the plunger 40 until further distal movement of the plunger 40 is limited by the plunger handle 47, other stop, or complete insertion of the osteochondral graft in the recipient site. The delivery device 10 can then be removed from the surgical site. If the osteochondral graft remains proud, a tamp or other instrument can be used to further insert the osteochondral graft such that it is flush with the surrounding articular cartilage.
The delivery device 10 may be provided to a surgeon pre-assembled in its entirety. Alternatively, the component parts or some less-than-complete assemblage of the components parts may be provided for final assembly at some point prior to its use in implanting the osteochondral graft. For example, as provided to the surgeon, the plunger 40 may not already be inserted into tube 30.
Assembly of the delivery device 10 is readily straightforward and apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. In accordance with various embodiments described herein, handle 50, if not integral with tube 30, is attached to the proximal end 31 of tube 30. O-ring is placed within the annular recess 55 disposed in the inner surface of the proximal end 53 of the bore 54 of the handle 50. Spring tab assembly 90 is attached to the tube 30 such that tabs 95 reside in apertures 38. The distal tip 44 of plunger 40 is inserted into the proximal end 31 of tube 30 (initially through the proximal end of handle 50 if the handle 50 is not integral with tube 30).
Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the present invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. For example, while the primary intended use of the delivery device of the present invention is for use in implanting osteochondral grafts, it is envisioned that the delivery device could be used for implanting other tissue implants. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the present invention. The indefinite articles “a” or “an”, as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one or more than one of the element that it introduces.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/873,049, filed on Aug. 31, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
493730 | McKenzie | Mar 1893 | A |
1405720 | Scott | Feb 1922 | A |
1567910 | Franz et al. | Dec 1925 | A |
1703154 | Lanzkron | Feb 1929 | A |
1984839 | Murray | Dec 1934 | A |
2573462 | Earle | Oct 1951 | A |
3564947 | Maier | Feb 1971 | A |
3564948 | Pomernacki | Feb 1971 | A |
3841909 | Nonaka et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3848601 | Ma | Nov 1974 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
3949743 | Shanbrom | Apr 1976 | A |
3971273 | Peters et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4010737 | Vilaghy et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4069216 | Shanbrom | Jan 1978 | A |
4086218 | Shanbrom et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4105650 | Shanbrom et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4137223 | Shanbrom et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4142592 | Brusselmans | Mar 1979 | A |
4186448 | Brekke | Feb 1980 | A |
4188318 | Shanbrom | Feb 1980 | A |
4189425 | Shanbrom et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4250892 | Dolhay et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4277184 | Solomon | Jul 1981 | A |
4294753 | Urist | Oct 1981 | A |
4305871 | Shanbrom | Dec 1981 | A |
4314997 | Shanbrom | Feb 1982 | A |
4315919 | Shanbrom | Feb 1982 | A |
4378224 | Nimni et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4387092 | Liautaud et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4412985 | Shanbrom | Nov 1983 | A |
4465623 | Chanas et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4571921 | Wolfson | Feb 1986 | A |
4589206 | Marcoux | May 1986 | A |
4627853 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4645488 | Matukas | Feb 1987 | A |
4706659 | Matthews et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4932973 | Gendler | Jun 1990 | A |
4933169 | Shanbrom | Jun 1990 | A |
4950256 | Luther et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4997915 | Tan et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002583 | Pitaru et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5019495 | Shanbrom | May 1991 | A |
5067964 | Richmond et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5112354 | Sires | May 1992 | A |
5115704 | Hyman | May 1992 | A |
5128149 | Shanbrom | Jul 1992 | A |
5128150 | Shanbrom | Jul 1992 | A |
5139520 | Rosenberg | Aug 1992 | A |
5152763 | Johnson | Oct 1992 | A |
5152791 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156973 | Shanbrom | Oct 1992 | A |
5160313 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165824 | Corcoran et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5184926 | Hemmings | Feb 1993 | A |
5186945 | Shanbrom | Feb 1993 | A |
5197833 | Mayer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204324 | Shanbrom | Apr 1993 | A |
5207681 | Ghadjar et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211661 | Shinjou et al. | May 1993 | A |
5259971 | Smith Morse et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5320115 | Kenna | Jun 1994 | A |
5320626 | Schmieding | Jun 1994 | A |
5328722 | Ghanayem et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333626 | Morse et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341816 | Allen | Aug 1994 | A |
5345927 | Bonutti | Sep 1994 | A |
5360605 | Shanbrom | Nov 1994 | A |
5362166 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368051 | Dunn et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370692 | Fink et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370869 | Shanbrom | Dec 1994 | A |
5374539 | Nimni et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5423823 | Schmieding | Jun 1995 | A |
5425490 | Goble et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443468 | Johnson | Aug 1995 | A |
5496326 | Johnson | Mar 1996 | A |
5513662 | Morse et al. | May 1996 | A |
5545401 | Shanbrom | Aug 1996 | A |
5556379 | Wolfinbarger | Sep 1996 | A |
5575798 | Koutrouvelis | Nov 1996 | A |
5587912 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589072 | Shanbrom | Dec 1996 | A |
5591234 | Kirsch | Jan 1997 | A |
5603716 | Morgan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607474 | Athanasiou et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609864 | Shanbrom | Mar 1997 | A |
5613982 | Goldstein | Mar 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | May 1997 | A |
5632747 | Scarborough et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632778 | Goldstein | May 1997 | A |
5697932 | Smith et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716413 | Walter | Feb 1998 | A |
5718707 | Mikhail | Feb 1998 | A |
5741685 | Vacanti | Apr 1998 | A |
5741782 | Brockbank et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770705 | Shanbrom | Jun 1998 | A |
5771310 | Vannah | Jun 1998 | A |
5782835 | Hart et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782915 | Stone | Jul 1998 | A |
5785522 | Bergstrom et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788713 | Dubach et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797871 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800537 | Bell | Sep 1998 | A |
5810887 | Accorti, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811471 | Shanbrom | Sep 1998 | A |
5814225 | Shanbrom | Sep 1998 | A |
5817153 | Pendl et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820581 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843182 | Goldstein | Dec 1998 | A |
5853746 | Hunziker | Dec 1998 | A |
5854397 | Mechanic | Dec 1998 | A |
5858641 | Shanbrom | Jan 1999 | A |
5860946 | Hofstatter | Jan 1999 | A |
5865803 | Major | Feb 1999 | A |
5865849 | Stone | Feb 1999 | A |
5876452 | Athanasiou et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881733 | Stone | Mar 1999 | A |
5885293 | Mcdevitt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888061 | Reynolds | Mar 1999 | A |
5899860 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5899936 | Goldstein | May 1999 | A |
5902338 | Stone | May 1999 | A |
5904717 | Brekke et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916265 | Ju | Jun 1999 | A |
5919196 | Bobic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5919907 | Shanbrom | Jul 1999 | A |
5921987 | Stone | Jul 1999 | A |
5922027 | Stone | Jul 1999 | A |
5944755 | Stone | Aug 1999 | A |
5976104 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5977432 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984858 | Stone | Nov 1999 | A |
5985260 | Shanbrom | Nov 1999 | A |
5993451 | Burkhart | Nov 1999 | A |
5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013853 | Athanasiou et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017348 | Hart et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017349 | Heller et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019765 | Thornhill et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024735 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025538 | Yaccarino, III | Feb 2000 | A |
6027743 | Khouri et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036738 | Chanbrom | Mar 2000 | A |
6045787 | Shanbrom | Apr 2000 | A |
6046379 | Stone et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049025 | Stone | Apr 2000 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6063210 | Chakrabarti et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074394 | Krause | Jun 2000 | A |
6090998 | Grooms et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093204 | Stone | Jul 2000 | A |
6093401 | Shanbrom | Jul 2000 | A |
6096216 | Shanbrom et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110178 | Zech et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110206 | Stone | Aug 2000 | A |
6110482 | Khouri et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123731 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6146385 | Torrie et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6179871 | Halpern | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183764 | Shanbrom | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193722 | Zech et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210440 | Stone et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224574 | Al-Labban | May 2001 | B1 |
6231608 | Stone | May 2001 | B1 |
6235035 | Boukhris | May 2001 | B1 |
6242247 | Reiser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267786 | Stone | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270503 | Schmieding | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302887 | Spranza et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306142 | Johanson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322593 | Pathak | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350732 | Moore et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358253 | Torrie et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361786 | Shanbrom | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375658 | Hangody et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382204 | Jansen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383732 | Stone | May 2002 | B1 |
6395011 | Johanson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402783 | Stone | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440141 | Philippon | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448076 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455309 | Stone | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459948 | Ateshian et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468314 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488033 | Cerundolo | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511511 | Slivka et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520964 | Tallarida et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521179 | Girardot et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530928 | Frei et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541518 | Shanbrom | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548076 | Shanbrom | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6569200 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582438 | DeMayo | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591581 | Schmieding | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592588 | Bobic et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599690 | Abraham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610067 | Tallarida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610316 | Shanbrom | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626945 | Simon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626950 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632246 | Simon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652592 | Grooms et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656195 | Peters et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682695 | Macphee et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682760 | Noff et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689161 | Chen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696270 | Badylak et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699252 | Farr, II et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727224 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734018 | Wolfinbarger et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743435 | Devore et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6743574 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758865 | Stone et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6767354 | Johanson et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6793429 | Arrison | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793676 | Plouhar et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6821533 | Shanbrom | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837907 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841060 | Shanbrom | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852114 | Cerundolo | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852125 | Simon et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855169 | Boyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858042 | Nadler et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863905 | Shanbrom | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6881731 | Shanbrom | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6884245 | Spranza, III | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893653 | Abraham et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6933103 | Klein et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6972041 | Stone | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6988015 | Schopf et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6998418 | Sung et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7008763 | Cheung | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029479 | Tallarida et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037339 | Houfburg | May 2006 | B2 |
7048477 | Abrams | May 2006 | B2 |
7060022 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064187 | Stone | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7129035 | Goldstein et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7160305 | Schmieding | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175979 | Luwel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7217294 | Kusanagi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7264634 | Schmieding | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291149 | Michelson | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7297716 | Shanbrom | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7323445 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7371260 | Malinin | May 2008 | B2 |
7410947 | Rueger et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411006 | Shanbrom | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7416371 | Scott et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427293 | Nycz et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
RE40570 | Carpentier et al. | Nov 2008 | E |
7548865 | Schmieding | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7550007 | Malinin | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7563266 | Camino et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7572291 | Gil et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591820 | Schmieding et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608098 | Stone | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7666230 | Orban | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7758583 | Gil et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758643 | Stone et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776043 | Hycz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7833269 | Nycz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862567 | Schmieding | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875032 | Lyons | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7879040 | Bharadwaj | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887546 | Gil | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905904 | Stone et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909851 | Stone et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909873 | Tan-Malecki et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914539 | Stone et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955335 | Gil et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7955336 | Gil et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985230 | Gil et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7997174 | Gil et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034090 | Stone et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048079 | Iannarone | Nov 2011 | B2 |
RE43714 | Nadler et al. | Oct 2012 | E |
8435305 | Lozier et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20010000804 | Goldstein et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010051828 | Stone et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013627 | Geistlich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026244 | Trieu | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020082704 | Cerundolo | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087211 | Stone et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102287 | Shanbrom | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117403 | Shanbrom | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119437 | Grroms et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127719 | Stone | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020191487 | Sand | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012687 | Macphee et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022149 | Shanbrom | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027125 | Mills et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035843 | Livesey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036762 | Kerr et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036801 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039673 | Shanbrom | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030064090 | Khouri et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065333 | DeMayo | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068815 | Stone et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074065 | Stone | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030129167 | Shanbrom | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135209 | Seedhom et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144743 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030161897 | Shanbrom | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167062 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171810 | Steiner | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180181 | Greib et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198699 | Shanbrom | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216669 | Lang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220700 | Hammer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225459 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228692 | Goldstein et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229400 | Masuda et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034359 | Schmeiding et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037735 | Depaula et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039400 | Schmieding et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048796 | Hariri et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052830 | Konertz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059425 | Schmieding | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059430 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040067582 | Lloyd et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073223 | Burkinshaw | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076657 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081954 | Stone et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098135 | Stone et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040147932 | Burkinshaw et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157206 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176771 | Schmieding | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192605 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193154 | Leatherbury et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197373 | Gertzman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204715 | Evans et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230194 | Urbanski et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230303 | Gomes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234507 | Stoen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236340 | Cirotteau et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243250 | Stone et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013870 | Freyman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013872 | Freyman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021044 | Stone et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038520 | Bienette et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043813 | Kusanagi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043814 | Kusanagi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043819 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050064042 | Vunjak-novakovic et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064591 | Stone | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080435 | Smith et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089544 | Khouri et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113736 | Orr et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124997 | Pajunk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137600 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050196393 | Shanbrom | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209705 | Niederauer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222687 | Vunjak-novakovic et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251268 | Truncale | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256588 | Sawa et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060019234 | Shanbrom | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024380 | Abraham et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060209 | Shepard | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083729 | Kusanagi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060127495 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060127876 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131906 | Maurer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142684 | Shanbrom | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178748 | Dinger, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193885 | Leonard Neethling et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195188 | O'Driscoll et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247790 | McKay | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275377 | Gomes et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010897 | Stone | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043376 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070093896 | Malinin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070135917 | Malinin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135918 | Malinin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135928 | Malinin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149982 | Lyons | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070270711 | Gil et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276506 | Troxel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299517 | Davisson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019115 | Park, II et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027447 | Gil et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051812 | Schmitz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058953 | Scarborough | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080167653 | Watlington et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195115 | Oren et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200915 | Globerman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243028 | Howard et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243029 | Howard et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255427 | Satake et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262616 | McKay | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269566 | Measamer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281081 | Shanbrom | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306608 | Nycz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024224 | Chen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047085 | Liao et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054906 | Walthall et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076556 | McGarity et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090171359 | Sterrett | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209962 | Jamali | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228031 | Ritter | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090275950 | Sterrett et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281550 | Keller | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299371 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299372 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319051 | Nycz et al. | Dec 2009 | A9 |
20100123325 | Maffeis | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168750 | Sherman | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249786 | Schmieding et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292704 | Stoffel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110009872 | Mistry et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046628 | Jamali | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054408 | Wei et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110137315 | Gil et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144648 | Gil et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208193 | Gil et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120053588 | Lozier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120053642 | Lozier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4922296 | Sep 1996 | AU |
700349 | Jan 1997 | AU |
717552 | Mar 1998 | AU |
2411618 | Apr 1975 | DE |
2830566 | Jan 1980 | DE |
2933174 | Apr 1980 | DE |
4317448 | Nov 1994 | DE |
19503504 | Mar 1996 | DE |
0307241 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0493698 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0508710 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0399647 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0768332 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0779320 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0815809 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0824893 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0824893 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0871414 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0584195 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1006957 | May 2003 | EP |
0740555 | Mar 2004 | EP |
0814710 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1237511 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1452150 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1637037 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1234552 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1698358 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2700462 | Jul 1994 | FR |
2860423 | Apr 2005 | FR |
1565340 | Apr 1980 | GB |
2175506 | Dec 1986 | GB |
3178652 | Feb 1991 | JP |
4303450 | Oct 1992 | JP |
9122226 | May 1997 | JP |
10251492 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10513386 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2088240 | Aug 1997 | RU |
WO-9106213 | May 1991 | WO |
WO-9211046 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO-9212631 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO-9315694 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO-9426211 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-9502350 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-9612509 | May 1996 | WO |
WO-9624302 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO-9624310 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO-9627333 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO-9634955 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO-9725942 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-9746665 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9802578 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO-9834569 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-9834596 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-9840027 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO-9846165 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-9856317 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9921497 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-9947080 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-9944533 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-9951170 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-0029037 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0041739 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0047131 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0047132 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0105336 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0108715 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-0130276 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0143667 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-0154619 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0182993 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0191671 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0224244 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-02089711 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03023272 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03097809 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-2004017731 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2004047622 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2004052098 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2004075727 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004075940 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004100841 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2004103224 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005023321 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005038016 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005063314 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2005092208 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2005094694 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2005112627 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2005118014 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006026325 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006026325 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006026981 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006074373 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006092718 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2008147692 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009114524 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2010092100 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO-2011008968 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/149,853, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2004”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/149,853, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 5, 2004”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/149,853, Preliminary Amendment mailed Oct. 17, 2002”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/149,853, Response filed Jul. 6, 2004 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2004”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2005”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Notice of Allowance mailed May 15, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Jan. 7, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Oct. 29, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 12, 2007”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Response filed Feb. 7, 2011 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Jan. 7, 2011”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Response filed Sep. 15, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Response filed Nov. 29, 2010 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Oct. 29, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Response filed Dec. 15, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2011”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,575, Revised Preliminary Amendment filed Sep. 15, 2010 in Response to Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2010”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Advisory Action filed Dec. 10, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Response filed May 4, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Response filed Nov. 23, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 30, 2009”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Response filed Dec. 3, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2010”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 30, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/759,679, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2010”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/759,679, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/759,679, Response filed Jun. 28, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/759,679, Response filed Oct. 30, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 4, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/759,679, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 4, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,416, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,416, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,416, Response filed Jun. 2, 2011 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 11, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,416, Response filed Jul. 17, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2012”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,416, Response filed Dec. 5, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2011”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,416, Restriction Requirement mailed May 11, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 21, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Feb. 6, 2012”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2012”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Jan. 10, 2011 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Feb. 1, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Jun. 12, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2012”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Jun. 21, 2010 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 8, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Sep. 12, 2012 to Advisory Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Oct. 7, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2010”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 8, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2012”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Response filed Feb. 28, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2012”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Response filed Jul. 27, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 10, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 10, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,049, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 25, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,049, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 14, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,049, Response filed Jul. 27, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 10, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,049, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 10, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“Aseptically-Processed Bone and Connective Tissue”, American Red Cross, (1995), 2 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 200116857, Office Action mailed Feb. 13, 2004”, 2 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 00979315.9, Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2007”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 00979315.9, Response filed Jul. 23, 2007 to Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2007”, 14 pgs. |
“Disinfectant Details and Their Uses”, The Master Budgerigar Breeder <http://www.bestofbreeds.net/masterbreeder/chap6/chap6disinfectant6.htm>, (1991), 1-14. |
“European Application Serial No. 04020622.9, European Search Report mailed Nov. 29, 2004”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 04020622.9, Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 04020622.9, Response filed Apr. 13, 2006 to Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2005”, 12 pgs. |
“High Pressure Process”, (1991), 1-14. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CH2000/000659, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Mar. 20, 2002”, 15 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CH2000/000659, International Search Report mailed Jan. 2, 2001”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/063582, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Nov. 24, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/063582, International Search Report mailed Oct. 9, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/063582, Written Opinion mailed Oct. 9, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/064653, International Search Report mailed Sep. 7, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/064653, Written Opinion mailed Sep. 7, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/036661, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Sep. 14, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/036661, International Search Report mailed Jun. 12, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/036661, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 12, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Office Action mailed Jan. 5, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Response filed Apr. 27, 2010 to Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Response filed Jun. 11, 2009 to Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2000-544609, Response filed Oct. 28, 2008 to Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2008”, 14 pgs. |
“Macro Sensors”, LVDT Basics, Technical Bulletin 0103, (Jan. 31, 2003), 4. |
“Omnicide 14 Day Glutaraldehyde Disinfectant Gallon”, (Accessed Mar. 6, 2008), 1-2. |
“Omnicide—The DEFRA approved disinfectant to kill Avian Influenza”, The Coventry Group, (2007), 1-2. |
“Resorbable, Cylindrical Scaffold to Support Healing of Tissue”, TruFit BGS Plugs, Bone Graft Substitute Plugs, Publication # 6100048, OsteoBiologics, Inc. San Antonio, TX USA, (2004), 2 pgs. |
“Single Use OATS (Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System) Surgical Technique”, Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA, (2005), 6 pgs. |
“Standards for Tissue Banking”, American Association of Tissue Banks, 12th Edition, (2008), 21 pgs. |
“Trough”, Merriam-Websters Dictionary Definition, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trough, (Nov. 2010), 3 pgs. |
Aichroth, et al., “Biologicl and Mechanical Problems of Osteoarticular Allografting: The Relation to Clinical Organ Transplantation”, The Journal of the Western Pacific Orthopaedic Association, vol. VIII, No. 2, London England, No Image Available, (1971), 25-70. |
Akens, “In-viro and in-vivo studies of osteochondral transplants pretreated with photo-oxidation”, Ph.D. Thesis, (2002), 1-100. |
Akens, Margarete K, et al., “Long term in-vivo studies of a photo-oxidized bovine osteochondral transplant in sheep.”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 2, No. 9, (2001), 12 pgs. |
Albee, Fred H, “Bone Surgery With Machine Tools”, Scientific American vol. 154.4, (Apr. 1936), 178-181. |
Bakay, et al., “A mushroom-shaped osteochondral patella allograft”, International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 20, (1996), 370-372. |
Bakay, et al., “Osteochondral resurfacing of the knee joint with allograft”, International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 22, (1998), 277-281. |
Bakay, et al., “The alternatives of the application of human lyophillized spongiosa and bone-matrix gelatin”, Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 136, No. 35, Budpest, (1995), 1891-1896. |
Baragi, et al., “Transplantation of adenvirally transduced allogeneic chondrocytes into articular cartilage defects in vivo”, Osteoarthritis and cartilage, vol. 5, (1997), 275-282. |
Barber, et al., “COR Osteochondral Repair System”, Osteobiologics, Inc., (2006), 17 pgs. |
Barber, et al., “Osteochondral Repair System”, www.obi.com, (2006), 1-17. |
Barber, F. Alan, “An Arthroscopic Technique for Repair of Osteochondral Defects”, The New Generation in Osteochondral Transplantation, DePuy Mitek, Inc., Raynham, MA USA, (2007), 9 pgs. |
Barber, F. Alan, et al., “Osteochondral Repair System”, <www.obi.eomlproducts—TruFit.htm>, 17 pgs, Sep. 11, 2006. |
Bar-Shavit, Z., et al., “Glucocorticoids Modulate Macrophage Surface Oligo saccharides and Their Bone Binding Activity”, J. Clin. Invest., vol. 73, (1984), 1277-1283. |
Beaver, R. J, et al., “Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Post-Traumatic Defects in the Knee”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 74-8, No. 1, (1992), 105-110. |
Bobic, V, “Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study”, Knee Surg, Sport Traumatol, Arthroscopy 3, (1996), 262-264. |
Bodo, G., et al., “Arthroscopic Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Subchondral Cystic Lesion in the Medial Femoral Condyle in a Horse”, Acta Veternaria Hungarica, vol. 48(3), (2000), 343-354. |
Bos, et al., “Immune Responses of Rats to Frozen Bone Allografts”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 65A(2), (1983), 239-246. |
Brighton, et al., “Articular Cartilage Preservation and Storage”, Arthritis and Rheumatism 22(10), (1979), 1093-1101. |
Brooks, et al., “Immunological Factors in Homogenous Bone Transplantation”, The Journal of None and Joint Surgery 45(8), (1963), 1617-1626. |
Bugbee, “Fresh Osteochondral Allografts”, The Journal of Knee Surgery 15(3), (2002), 191-195. |
Bugbee, et al., “Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation”, Complex Topics in Knee Surgery, vol. 18, No. 1, (1999), 67-75. |
Bugbee, William D, “Fresh Osteochondral Allografts”, Seminars in Arthroplasty, vol. 11, No. 4, No Image Available, (2000), 221-226. |
Burba, et al., “An arthroscopic biopsy procedure for obtaining osteochondral samples from the equine midcarpal joint”, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 5, (1992), 343-359. |
Calandruccio, et al., “Proliferation, Regeneration, and Repair of Articular Cartilage of Immature Animals”, J. Bone Joint Surg, vol. 44-A, No. 3, (1962), 431-455. |
Chalmers, J, “Transplantation immunity in bone homografting”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 41B, No. 1, No Image Available, (1959), 160-179. |
Chu, et al., “Articular Cartilage Transplantation—Clinical Results in the Knee”, Clinical Orthoaedics and Related Research, (1991), 139-145. |
Clarke, Ian C, “Quantitative measurement of human articular surface topography in vitro by profile recorder and stereomicroscopy techniques”, Journal of Microscopy, vol. 97, Pl. 3, (Apr. 1973), 309-314. |
Convery, et al., “Fresh osteochondral allografting of the femoral condyle”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 273, (1991), 139-145. |
Convery, et al., “Long-Term Survival of Chondrocytes in an Osteochondral Articular Cartilage Allograft”, A Case Report 78(7), (1996), 1082-1087. |
Convery, F.R., et al., “The Repair of Large Osteochondral Defects”, An Experimental Study in Horses, Clin. Orthrop. 82., (1972), 253-262. |
Cornell, et al., “A biosensor that uses ion-channel switches”, Nature vol. 387, (Jun. 1997), 580-583. |
Csonge, Lajos, et al., “Banking of Osteochodral allografts. Part I. Viability assays adapted for osteochondral and cartilage studies”, Cell and Tissue Banking 3, (2002), 151-159. |
Csonge, Lajos, et al., “Banking of Osteochondral Allografts, Part II. Preservation of Chondrocyte Viability During Long-Term Storage”, Cell and Tissue Banking 3, (2002), 161-168. |
Czitrom, et al., “Bone and Cartilage Allotransplantation: Review of 14 Years of Research and Clinical Studies”, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, (1986), 141-145. |
Delloye, et al., “Osteochondral Allografts in Arm and Forearm Surgery”, Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, vol. 57, (1991), 75-83. |
Desjardins, et al., “Incorporation of Fresh and Cryopreserved Bone in Osteochondral Autografts in the Horse”, Veterinary Surgery, vol. 20, No. 6, (1991), 446-452. |
Donald, Paul J, “Cartilage Grafting in Facial Reconstructions with Special Consideration of Irradiated Grafts”, Laryngoscope, vol. 96, (1986), 786-806. |
Ehalt, W, “Bisherige Erfahrungen mit dem plastischen Ersatz von Gelenkknorpel aus der Knochenbank”, Verh. Dtsch. Orthop. Ges. 43, (1955), 107-109. |
Ehalt, W., et al., “Gelenkknorpel-Plastik”, Langenbecks Arch. Kiln. Chir. 299, (1962), 768-774. |
Ehalt, Walther M, “Grafting of joint-cartilage Bone-Blocks from the bank”, VI. Congr. Soc. Internat. Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. S., (1954), 419-421. |
Elves, et al., “A Study of the Humoral Immune Response to Osteoarticular Allografts in the Sheep”, Clin. exp. Immunol., vol. 17, (1974), 497-508. |
Flynn, et al., “Osteoarticular Allografts to Treat Distal Femoral Osteonecrosis”, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., No. 303, (1994), 38-43. |
Friedlaender, et al., “Studies on the antigenicity of bone. I. Freeze-dried and deep-frozen bone allografts in rabbits”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 58, (1976), 854-858. |
Friedlaender, Gary E, “Immune Responses to Osteochondral Allografts”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 174, (1983), 58-68. |
Garrett, John C, “Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Treatment of Articular Defects in Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Lateral Femoral Condyle in Adults”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 303, (1994), 33-37. |
Garrett, John C, “Osteochondral Allografts”, Instructional Course Lectures, vol. 42, (1993), 355-358. |
Garrett, John C, “Osteochondral Allografts for Reconstruction of Articular Defects of the Knee”, AAOS Instructional Course Lectures, 27, (1998), 517-522. |
Garrett, John C, “Treatment of Osteochondral Defects of the Distal Femur with Fresh Osteochondral Allografts: A Preliminary Report”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 2(4), (1986), 222-226. |
Ghazavi, M. T, et al., “Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Post-Traumatic Osteochondral Defects of the Knee”, J. Bone Joint Surg., 79-B, (1997), 1008-1013. |
Gould, Nathaniel, “Trephining Your Way”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 4, No. 1, (1973), 157-164. |
Gross, “Use of Fresh Osteochondral Allografts to Replace Traumatic Joint Defects”, Allografts in Orthopaedic Practice Ch 5, (1992), 67-82. |
Guhl, James F, “Chapter 21: The Impact of Arthroscopy on Osteochondritis Dissecans”, Operative Arthroscopy, (1991), 297-317. |
Hangody, L, et al., “Autogenous osteochondral grafting in the knees of German Shepherd dogs: Radiographic and histological analysis”, Hungarian Review of Sports Medicine 35, (1994), 117-123. |
Hangody, L, et al., “Treatment of localized chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee by a new autogenous osteochondral grafting tenique”, Hungarian Review of Sports Medicine 35, (1994), 241-246. |
Hangody, Laszlo, “Arthroscopic autogeous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects: A preliminary report”, Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc 5, (1997), 262-267. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Artoszkopos autolog osteochondralis mozaikplastica (Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty)”, Hungarian Journal of Traumatology and Orthopaedics 39, (1996), 49-54. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Autogenous Osteochondral Graft Technique for Replacing Knee Cartilage Defects in Dogs”, Autogenous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty—Orthopaedics International Ed., vol. 5, No. 3, (1997), 175-181. |
Hangody, Laszlo, “Autologous osteochondral mosaic-like graft technique for replacing weight bearing cartilage defects”, 7th Congress of ESSTKSA, Abstract Only, (1996), 3 pgs. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Autologous Osteochondral Mosaic-Plasty”, Review of Osteology 3, (1996), 70-73. |
Hangody, Laszlo, “Chapter 13: Autogenous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Focal Chondral and Osteochondral Defects of the Femoral Condyles”, Knieinstabilitat und Knorpelschaden, (1998), 97-106. |
Hangody, Laszlo, “Mosaic-plasty in Clinical Practice”, Review of Osteology 4, (1996), 32-36. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: Application in Clinical Practice”, Orthopedics 21(7), (1998), 751-756. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.egydoc.com/Sites/Arthroclub/AC—Files/Articles/article39.pdf>, (Accessed Nov. 8, 2005), 9 pgs. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “New Method in Treatment of Sever Local Cartilage Damage in the Knee Joint (Eine neue Methode in der Behandlung von schweren, lokalen Knorpelschaden im Kniegelenk”, Osteosynthese International 5, (1997), 316-321. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Osteochondral Grafting Using the Smith & Nephew Mosaicplasty System”, Mosiacplasty Autogenous Osteochondral Grafting System, Knee Series, Technique Guide, (2001, 2005), 12 pgs. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Osteochondral Plugs: Autogenous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Focal Chondral and Osteochondral Articular Defects”, Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics 7(4), (1997), 312-322. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Sülyos, körülírt térdízületi porckárosodás sebészi kezelésének új lehetosége (New alternative in the treatment of sever, localized cartilage damages in the knee joint)”, Hungarian Journal of Traumatology and Orthopaedics 37, (1994), 237-242. |
Hangody, Laszlo, et al., “Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Talus: Use of Mosaicplasty Technique—A Preliminary Report”, Foot and Ankle International 18(10), (1997), 628-634. |
Harrison, et al., “Effect of Extraction Protocols and Epidermal Growth Factor on the Cellular Repopulation of Decellularized Anterior Cruciate Ligament Allografts”, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Biomed Mater Res 75A, (2005), 841-854. |
Hetherington, Vincent J, et al., “Immunologic Testing for Xeno-Derived Osteocartilagenous Grafts”, Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine Research Foundation, (2002), 1 pg. |
Hetherington, Vincent J, et al., “Immunologic Testing of xeno-derived osteochondral grafts using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy human donors”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders vol. 6, No. 36, (2005), 11 pgs. |
Hetherington, Vincent J, et al., “Qualitative Histological Evaluation of Photooxidized Bovine Ostechondral Grafts in Rabbits: A Pilot Study”, The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 46(4), (2007), 223-229. |
Hudson, et al., “OptimizedAcellular Nerve Graft is Immunologically Tolerated and Supports Regeneration”, Tissue Engineering 10(11/12), (2004), 1641-1652. |
Hurtig, et al., “Osteochondral Dowel Transplantation for Repair of Focal Defects in the Knee: an Outcome Study Using an Ovine Model”, Vet. Surgery vol. 27, (1998), 5-16. |
Hurtig, M B, “Experimental use of small osteochondral grafts for resurfacing the equine third carpal bone”, Equine Orthopaedics, Supp. 6, (1988), 23-27. |
Hurtig, M, et al., “Surgical and analytical techniques for articular cartilage transplantation”, Veterinary Surgery, The Official Journal of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons, Inc., vol. 21, No. 5, (1992), 394. |
Hurtig, M, et al., “Surgical and analytical techniques for assessment of transplanted articular cartilage: A pilot study”, Cryobiology, 29(6), Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for Cryobiology Ithaca, New York, USA, (1992), 732. |
Jakob, et al., “Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee: Indication, Results and Reflections”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 401, (2002), 170-184. |
Jakob, et al., “Isolated articular cartilage lesion: repari or regeneration”, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Journal of the OsteoArthritis Research Society International, vol. 9, Supplement A, www.idealibrary.com, (2001), S3-S5. |
Jamali, et al., “Donor cell survival in a fresh osteochondral allograft at twenty-nine years”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 89, (2007), 166-169. |
Jimenez, et al., “Experimental Studies on the Fate of Transplanted Articular Cartilage”, Osteochondral Allografts, Biology, Banking and Clinical Applications, (1983), 73-79. |
Kamijou, et al., “Effects of Osteocytes on Osteoinduction in the Autogenous Rib Graft in the Rat Mandible”, Bone, vol. 15, No. 6, (1994), 629-637. |
Kawalec-Carroll, et al., “Immunogenicity of unprocessed and photooxidized bovine and human osetochondral grafts in collagen-sensitive mice”, BMC Musculo. Dis., vol. 7, (2006), 1471-2474. |
Kawamura, et al., “Human Fibrin Is a Physiologic Delivery System for Bone Morphogenetic Protein”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (Oct. 1988), 302-310. |
Kelley, et al., “Chondrocyte repopulation of allograft cartilage: A preliminary investigation and strategy for developing cartilage matrice for reconstruction”, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 127, No. 4, (2002), 265-270. |
Kluger, et al., “Removal of the surface layers of human cortical bone allografts restores in vitro osteoclast function reduced by processing and frozen storage”, Bone 32, (2003), 291-296. |
Kubler, N., et al., “Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Mediated Interaction of Periosteum and Diaphysis”, Clincal Orthopedics and Related Research, vol. 258, (1990), 279-294. |
Kwan, et al., “Histological and Biomechanical Assessment of Articular Cartilage from Stored Osteochondrol Shell Allografts”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 7, No. 5, (1989), 637-644. |
Lehman, Richard C, “Surgical Technique for Backfill of Graft Harvest Site for Osteochondral Autograft Transfer (OATS) Procedure”, Osseofit Porous Tissue Matrix, BIOMET Sports Medicine, Inc., Warsaw, IN USA, (2008), 12 pgs. |
Lexer, E, “Joint transplantation”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 197, (1985), 4-10. |
Lindholm, Sam, et al., “Reconstruction of the Articular Surface by Transfixation of an Osteochondral Fragment of the Femoral Condyle Using a Bone Transplant”, Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology Supplement 44, (1982), 5-13. |
Locht, et al., “Late Osteochondral Allograft Resurfacing for Tibial Plateau Fractures”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 66(3), (1984), 328-335. |
Mahomed, M.N., et al., “The Long-Term Success of Fresh, Small Fragment Osteochondral Alografts Used for Intraarticular Post-Traumatic Defects in the Knee Joint”, Orthopedics 15, (1992), 1191-1199. |
Malinin, et al., “Banking of Massive Osteoarticular and Intercalary Bone Allografts—12 Years Experience”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 197, (1985), 44-57. |
Malinin, et al., “Cryopreservation of articular cartilage”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 33, (1994), 18-32. |
Mankin, et al., “Clinical experience with allograft implantation”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 74, (1983), 69-86. |
Marco, F, et al., “Osteochondral Allografts in Femoral Condyles”, International Orthopaedics 17, (1993), 105-108. |
Matsusue, et al., “Arthroscopic Multiple Osteochondral Transplantation to the Chondral Defect in teh Knee Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Disruption”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 9, No. 3, (1993), 318-321. |
Maury, et al., “Twenty-five year chondrocyte viability in fresh osteochondral allograft. A Case Report”, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 89, (1993), 159-165. |
McDermott, et al., “Fresh small-fragment osteochondral allografts”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 197, (1985), 96-102. |
McPherson, et al., “Creep Behavior of Osteochondral Grafts in Sheep”, 39th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, (1993), 227. |
Meyers, et al., “Resurfacing of the Femoral Head with Fresh Osteochondral Allograft”, Clinical Orthopaedics adn Related Research, No. 197, (1985), 111-114. |
Meyers, et al., “Resurfacing of the Knee with Fresh Osteochondral Allograft”, J. Bone Joint Surg., (1989), 704-713. |
Muller, W, “Osteochondrosis Dissecans”, Progress in Orthopaedic Surgery vol. 3, (1978), 135-142. |
Oakeshott, et al., “A Clinical and Histological Analysis of Failed Fresh Osteochondral Allogafts”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 233, (1988), 283-294. |
Outerbridge, R E, “Joint Surface transplants—a preliminary report”, The Journal of Western Pacific Orthopaedic Association, vol. VIII, No. 1, (1971), 1-15. |
Pap, et al., “Arthroplasty of the Knee: Experimental and Clinical Experiences”, The Journal of Bone& Joint Surgery, vol. 43-A, No. 4, (1961), 523-537. |
Pegg, et al., “Cryopreservation of articular cartilage. Part 1: Conventional cryopreservation methods”, Cryobiology 52, (2006), 335-346. |
Peretti, Giuseppe M, et al., “Bonding of cartilage matrices with cultured chondrocytes: an experimental model”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research 16(1), (1998), 89-95. |
Pollok, et al., “Long term insulin-secretory function of islets of Langerhans encapsulated with a layer of confluent chondrocytes for immunoisolation”, Pediatric Surg Int, vol. 15, (1999), 164-167. |
Pollok, J. M., et al., “Immunoisolation of xenogeneic islets using a living tissue engineered cartilage barrier”, Transplantation Proceedings, 29(4), (1997), 2131-2133. |
Rechenberg, et al., “Changes in subchondral bone in cartilage resurfacing—an experimental study in sheep using different types of osteochondral grafts”, OsteoArthritis and Cartilage, vol. 11, (2003), 265-277. |
Robert, et al., “Studies on the Nature of the “Microfibrillar” Component of Elastic Fibers”, Eur. J. Biochem. 21, (1971), 507-516. |
Rodrigo, et al., “Osteocartilaginous Allografts as Compared with Autografts in teh Treatment of Knee Joint Osteocartilaginous Defects in Dogs”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 134, (1978), 342-349. |
Roffman, Moshe, “Autogenou grafting for an osteochondral fracture of the femorale condyle”, Acta Orthop Scand., vol. 66, No. 6, (1995), 571-572. |
Ronsky, J L, et al., “Precise Measurement of Cat Patellofemoral Joint Surface Geometry with Multistation Digital Photogrammetry”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 121, (Apr. 1999), 196-205. |
Scbachar, et al., “Transplantation of cryopreserved osteochondral dowel allografts of focal articular defects in Ovine model”, J. Orthop.Res., 17(6), (1999), 909-919. |
Schachar, et al., “The effect of Cryopreservative Agents on teh Viability of Frozen Human Articular Cartilage”, Canadian Orthopaedic Research Society, (1978), 79-80. |
Scharchar, et al., “Fate of massive osteochondral allografts in a feline model”, Osteochondral Allografts, Biology, Banking, and Clinical Applications, (1983), 81-101. |
Scharchar, et al., “Metabolic and biochemical status of articular cartilage following cryopreservation and transplantation: a rabbit model”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 10, (1992), 603-609. |
Shahgaldi, B F, et al., “Repair of Cartilage Lesions Using Biological Implants—A Comparative Histological and Biomechanical Study in Goats”, Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 73-5, UK, (1991), 57-64. |
Shimizu, et al., “Bone resorption by isolated osteoclasts in living versus devitalized bone”, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 5, No. 4, (1990), 411-418. |
Stevenson, et al., “The Fate of Articular Cartilage after Transplantation of Fresh and Cryopreserved Rissue-Antigen-Matched and Mismatched Osteochondral Allografts in Dogs”, J. Bone Joint Surg. vol. 71-A, No. 9, (1989), 1297-1307. |
Stone, et al., “Meniscal regeneration with copolymeric collagen scaffolds”, Amer. J. Sports Med., col. 20, No. 2, (1992), 104-111. |
Stone, et al., “Porcine Cartilage Transplants in the Cynomolgus Monkey: III. Transplantation of a-Galactosidase-Treated Porcine Cartilage”, Transplantation, vol. 65, No. 12, (1998), 1577-1583. |
Stone, et al., “Replacement of Human Anterior Cruciate Ligaments with Pig Ligaments: A Model for Ani-Non-Gal Antibody Response in Long-Term Exenotransplantation”, Transplantation, vol. 83, No. 2, (2007), 211-219. |
Toolan, et al., “Development of a Novel Osteochondral Graft for Cartilage Repair”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J.Biomed Mater Res, 41, (1998), 244-250. |
Verbruggen, et al., “Repair Function in Organ Cultured Human Cartilage. Replacement of Enzymatically Removed Proteoglycans During Longterm Organ Culture”, The Journal of Rheumatology 12(4), (1985), 665-674. |
Volkov, et al., “Use of Allogenous Articular Bone Implants as Substitutes for Autotransplants in Adult Patients”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 114, (1976), 192-202. |
Von Rechenberg, et al., “Changes in subchondral bone in cartilage resurfacing—an experimental study in sheep using different types of osteochondral grafts”, Osteoarthr. Cart., vol. 11, (2003), 265-277. |
Von Rechenberg, et al., “Mosaicplasty with photooxidized, mushroom-shaped, bovine, ostechondral xenografts in experimental sheep”, Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol., vol. 3, (2006), 147-156. |
Von Rechenberg, et al., “The use of photooxidixed, mushroom-shaped osteochondral grafts for cartilage resurfacing—a comparison to photooxidized cylindrical grafts in an experimental study in sheep”, Osteoarthr. Cart., vol. 12, (2004), 201-216. |
Wada, Yuichi, “Architectural remodeling in deep frozen meniscal allografts after total meniscectomy”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthoscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 14, No. 3, (1998), 250-257. |
Wohl, G, et al., “Assessment of Bone Mechanical Integrity in Osteochondral Grafts”, Orthopaedic Research Society, (1994), p. 526. |
Woods, et al., “Effectiveness of three extraction techniques in the development of a decellularized bone-anterior cruciate ligament-bone graft”, Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 26, No. 35, (Dec. 1, 2005), 7339-7349. |
Yamashita, F., et al., “The Transplantatoin of Autogeneic Osteochondral Fragment for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee”, Orthopedics 15, (1992), 1191-1199. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/149,853, Preliminary Amendment filed Sep. 14, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Nov. 25, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 3, 2013”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Response filed Nov. 27, 2013 to Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Advisory Action mailed Oct. 16, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 6, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Response filed Oct. 1, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,022, Non Final Office Action mailed May 8, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,102, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 9 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/196,831, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2014, 19 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,030, Response filed Mar. 6, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2013, 15 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130231745 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12873049 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13855157 | US |