This application is a National Phase application of PCT Patent Application Ser. No. PCT/CH2006/000250 filed on May 9, 2006, which claims the benefit of Switzerland Patent Application Serial No. 848/05 filed on May 15, 2005. The specifications of these applications are expressly incorporated by reference into this application in their entirety.
The invention refers to an osteosynthesis device including a pin predominantly consisting of bioresorbable material, and to a kit including an embodiment of the device and a drill bit.
Such devices can be used for various medical indications, in particular for:
Joint fragments occur for instance in the following cases:
In the majority of these cases, the knee joint (femur), the upper ankle joint (talus) and the hip joint ((femur) are affected.
Joint fragments typically measure between 2 and 30 mm and must, for an impeccable functioning of the joint, be anatomically fixated with precision. It is in this connection essential that the joint is not immobilized for cartilage nurturing reasons. A post-operative treatment with a continuous, passive motion therapy (CPM=continuous passive motion) is recommended. Moreover, the joint must be kept stably connected to its base bone in a free moving manner.
The operations for the indications listed under A) above are known as “ostechondrosyntheses”. In these situations, the so-called inter-fragmentary shearing motions are particularly feared. In order to prevent these, fixations are carried out with trans-fragmentary pins inserted from the side of the joint into the epiphyseal bone. The preparation of such pins from a resorbable material is also known.
The joint fragments are mostly so small that only a single pin can be placed inside them. Several pins would also endanger the strength and blood supply of the bone portion. The joint fragments are also often positioned in such a manner as to be accessed in an orthogonal and joint-side direction only with difficulty.
The state of the art for the indications listed above under B) is the Kirschner wire-fixation of the toe joints during the healing time (soft tissue and/or bone healing), where the wire projects from the toe tip. The disadvantage of this already known Art lies in the fact that the patient is barely able to work, because he has to wear a so-called “bumper” (for instance a hard rail).
The most common operation of this kind is the arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint, meaning the growing together of the bones, where unfortunately only a joint resection (the so-called Hohmann operation) is carried out. Also recommended is a functional operation whereby ligaments of the terminal phalanx are transferred to the base phalanx (the so-called Girdlestone and Taylor operation, 1947). Both operations require a 6-8 week mechanical immobilization.
The WO2004/089255 describes a tubular device for the temporary splinting of toes, which is implanted by a guiding wire. However, this known device possesses several disadvantages, as follows:
The present invention relates to an osteosynthesis device which may include a pin with a central axis and a predetermined length. The pin predominantly consists of a bioresorbable material. The pin has, in at least one section of the length, a non-circular cross section orthogonal to the central axis. The present invention also relates to a kit. The kit may include a device which as a pin as described above and a drill which has a diameter which is smaller than, and preferably over 30% smaller than, a maximum outside diameter of the pin. Some of the advantages of the present invention are listed below.
For the indications listed under A):
For the indications listed under B):
Some further advantages of the present invention are listed below:
In a particular form of embodiment of the invention, the non-circular cross section of the pin is realized over only part of its total length. This allows optimizing its strength. The non-circular cross section can be made in a polygonal, preferably triangular shape. Thank to the shape of this profile, the rotational protection can be optimized.
In another form of embodiment of the invention, the central axis of the pin may be curved. The advantage of this configuration lies essentially in the fact that the anatomical axis of the toe is reconstructed in the sagittal axis.
The ground contact of the toe body is curved with a slight “bias”. It has proved advantageous to intersect the tangents at both endpoints of the pin's central axis at an angle of 5°-20°. The advantage of this embodiment is in the “nailing” of the joint fragment or tubular bone which is, in case of difficult accesses done from any desired side through a penetrating bushing.
In a further form of embodiment of the invention, the pin presents on its peripheral surface at least three longitudinal edges or ridges. This achieves the advantage that the profiled edges of the pin are anchored in the cartilage or bone tissue.
The longitudinal edges or longitudinal ridges may separate from each other by concave depressions.
The maximum outside diameter of the pin is advantageously 1.5-3.5 mm, and the core diameter 1.0-2.5 mm.
In another form of embodiment of the invention, the pin tapers in the direction of the centre of the radius of curvature of the central axis. This facilitates the implantation of the pin.
The pin is preferably formed solid. The pin may be rounded off on at least one of its extremities.
The bioresorbable material forming the pin is advantageously made essentially brittle and fragile. The bioresorbable material conveniently exhibits a breaking elongation ε=(Δ×100/L)<10%. The advantage of such a material is in its better resorbability.
In another form of embodiment of the invention, the pin is made of a reinforced, preferably self-reinforced bioresorbable material. The resorbable material may be a poly-L-lactide (PLLA) or a caprolacton. These materials offer the advantage of reabsorbing more quickly through the joint fluid. The pin advantageously consists of a copolymer of lactic acid and glycol acid, preferably in a 3:1 to 5:1 ratio. The pin may also consist of a copolymer of poly-L-lactide (PLLA) and poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), preferably in a 3:1 to 5:1 ratio and typically in a 4:1 ratio. The pin may also consist of a copolymer of poly-L,D-lactide.
The length of the pin conveniently runs to maximally 6 cm, preferably maximally 5 cm. The length conveniently runs to at least 3.5 cm, preferably at least 4 cm.
In another form of embodiment, the pin is adapted for the temporary splinting of toes, in particular for the treatment of hammer toes or other toe misalignments.
In a further form of embodiment, the pin is adapted for the fixation of joint fragments, in particular those with both bone and cartilage portions.
In another form of embodiment, the pin offers a particular front end designed for inserting into the bone, which is preferably formed in a blunt and preferably planar manner. The blunt configuration of the front end is particularly suitable for an application in case of an ostechondritis. A pointed configuration of the front end is on the contrary particularly suitable in case of a toe application.
In another form of embodiment, the same includes a head portion coaxially bordering the pin, which comprises an axially opposite rear end and a cross section that enlarges toward the rear end. The advantages of such a form of embodiment lie in the fact that in case of applying the device in an osteochondritis the following nailing effects are secured:
In a further form of embodiment the cross-sectional area of the head portion set orthogonally to the central axis gradually enlarges in a direction toward the rear end of the head portion.
In another form of embodiment, the head portion presents a circularly cylindrical enveloping surface coaxial with the central axis, with a diameter matching the maximum outside diameter of the pin.
In another form of embodiment, the ratio between the length l of the head portion and the length L of the pin is between 1/20 and 1/3.
The invention and further developments of the invention will in the following be explained with the aid of partially simplified representation of two examples of embodiments.
The device for the temporary splinting of toes shown in the
The pin 1 presents a curvature in the plane of the drawing, with a radius of curvature of a length of 10 cm. The tangents 14, 15 at both end points 16, 17 of the central axis 2 of the pin 1 are in this case intersecting at an angle α of 10° to 20°, typically 15°. The length of the pin 1 amounts to 3.75 cm. The surface of the pin 1 is perfectly smooth. One end of the pin 1 destined for inserting into the toe is formed in a tapering fashion, so as to terminate in a rounded tip 11.
The
The borehole to be drilled into the marrow channel of the affected bones presents a bore diameter 18 which is advantageously smaller than the maximum diameter 12 of the pin 1′, so as to allow the longitudinal ridges 6, 7, 8 to cut themselves into the walls of the reamed marrow channel, so that a rotational stability of the pin 1′ results. The core diameter 13 of the pin 1′ amounts to 1.0-2.5 mm, typically 1.6 mm.
The
The form of embodiment represented in the
The pin 1″, which is limited by the distal-most front end 32 destined for inserting into the toe and the plane E, which is taken at the where the head portion 30 begins. The pin 1″ has a predetermined length L (i.e., the portion of the pin 1″ extending from the distal-most front end 32 to where the head portion 30 begins at plane E), which presents over its entire length L a triangular cross section 3, so that the peripheral surface 10 of the pin shows three planar lateral surfaces 26, 27, 28 and three longitudinal edges or longitudinal ridges 6, 7, 8. The cross section 3″ is limited by an equilateral triangle with a peripheral circle equal to the maximum outside diameter 12 of the pin 1, which remains constant over the entire predetermined length L.
The head portion 30 is distinguished by the fact that the plane lateral surfaces 26, 27, 28 of the pin 1″ are curved in an axial direction in such a manner that the distance a between the central axis 2 and any one of the lateral surfaces 26, 27, 28 gradually increases in a direction toward the rear end 31 of the head portion 30. The head portion 30 also presents a length l and a circularly cylindrical enveloping surface with a maximum outside diameter 12 into which lateral surfaces 26, 27, 28 at the rear end 31 of the pin 1″ are running into, so that the front surface 23 orthogonal to the central axis 2 at the rear end 31 of the pin 1″ is a circular surface.
For a better understanding of the device according to the invention, an operating sequence in key-word style follows:
On the example of an osteochondritis dissecans tali:
The profile of the fragment provides the necessary rotational stability. Inserting a second pin is not needed. In any case, there is generally no room for this purpose, and such a second pin would also endanger the vitality (blood supply).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
848/05 | May 2005 | CH | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2006/000250 | 5/9/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/26/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/119659 | 11/16/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1951278 | Ericsson | Mar 1934 | A |
2136471 | Schneider | Nov 1938 | A |
4169470 | Ender et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4446857 | Otte et al. | May 1984 | A |
4457301 | Walker | Jul 1984 | A |
4756307 | Crowninshield | Jul 1988 | A |
4805607 | Engelhardt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4898186 | Ikada et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5053035 | McLaren | Oct 1991 | A |
5201734 | Cozad et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207712 | Cohen | May 1993 | A |
5562704 | Tamminmaki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5895396 | Day et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5968047 | Reed | Oct 1999 | A |
6074392 | Durham | Jun 2000 | A |
6096060 | Fitts et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6203544 | Gotzen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6352560 | Poeschmann et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6409730 | Green et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6551343 | Tormala et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6635059 | Randall et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20020143335 | von Hoffmann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030088252 | Kaikkonen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097132 | Padget et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040030341 | Aeschlimann et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040215194 | Hehli et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060200150 | Ilomaki et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070173834 | Thakkar | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3919900 | Dec 1990 | DE |
2004089255 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110082507 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |