The present invention relates to ostomy appliances and more particularly to ostomy pouches having a filter.
Gas management and odor removal is of very significant concern in ostomy appliances. Despite the advances in various filter designs, there is still a need by ostomates for improved filter performance. Most ostomy filters currently on the market only work for a short time, in many instances less then 1 day. The key complaints have been leakage, clogging which leads to ballooning, insufficient deodorization, and reduced wear time. When some marketed filters stop working there can be leakage of stool outside of the pouch from the filter. Most of filter designs now utilize an oleophobic membrane to protect the filter from leaking in the presence of the enzymes and chemicals from feces. However, commercial ostomy pouches with or without oleophobic membranes have not addressed the clogging issue as effectively as desired by many ostomates. There are also ostomy pouches utilizing multiple membranes to improve both oleophobic and hydrophobic property in the filter, but this design increases the resistance of air flow significantly.
Most commercial ostomy filters are based on radial flow in which the gases flow along the plane of a relatively flat filter rather than directly or axially through the thickness of the filter. Such a radial or planar flow type is used in order to increase the reaction time between gases and the activated carbon. An axial flow type filter is difficult to make because of the difficulties involved in balancing the deodorization efficiency, the air flow requirement, and the profile of the filter. It is, however, desirable to have an axial flow filter that would allow a relatively small filter to be used without sacrificing the deodorization performance. A small filter size is preferred because it allows the filter to be positioned as close as possible to the seam of a pouch so that the face of the filter is not directly in front of the opening of the stoma, thus decreasing the tendency of filter clogging.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved filtering system to improve clogging resistance. Furthermore, there is a need for an axial flow filter in order to minimize the filter profile and to make a small size filter possible.
One aspect of the invention in the filter design of the present invention is to improve the clogging resistance by using the newly developed pleated center panel design. This design includes a filter in the front panel of the pouch and a center panel of film that is intended to shield the filter from direct exposure to stool that is expelled from the stoma. The center panel has at least one pleat, and preferably two pleats, that are intentionally formed into the center panel. These pleats allow the gas to travel from the stoma area into the filter area while preventing a majority of the stool from get to and fouling the filter. Without these pleats the center panel has a tendency to block or seal against the front panel of the pouch and not allow gas to get to the filter and thus cause ballooning of the pouch. Optionally, an open cell foam can be added between the face of the filter and the pleats to further reduce any stool that might get past the pleats.
Another aspect of the invention is the incorporation of a filter designed for axial air flow. The pleated design makes possible the use of a small size filter which has a low profile. Both the strip filter and axially flow filter can be combined with the pleated center panel design to improve the clogging resistance.
Another aspect of the invention is a strip filter design, in which the filter is wrapped with an odor barrier film around its perimeter. Such a design allows the filter to maximize its deodorization performance without significantly increasing the air flow resistance.
A test method was devised to mimic actual usage of filtered pouches and their resistance to clogging. Testing was conducted on a specifically designed tilting table test rig. The test rig was designed to hold the test filtered pouches in the vertical position and tilt them to the horizontal position at timed intervals. The tilt table test rig also incorporates a means to inject air into the filtered test pouch to simulate gas produced by the body. The test pouches with filters are also filled with a simulated stool referred to as Feclone, which is commercially sold and mixed to a desired viscosity of 1 part solid to 3 parts water, to challenge the filtering system from a clogging perspective. When the testing is conducted, the filtering system is exposed to the simulated stool and simulated gas at timed intervals of 10 minutes in each position. Pouches are continuously cycled through the vertical and horizontal positions during this tilt table test. During each cycle the test pouches are injected with about 300 cc air to fill each pouch every 10 minutes with a fill time of 5 seconds. When the filter is not clogged, the test pouch deflates normally by releasing the air through the filter system. Testing is continued until all pouches have failed to release air from inside of the pouch, as indicated by the ballooning in the pouch. The criteria for filter failure is when a test filtered pouch fails to deflate and stays fully ballooned for 3 consecutive tilt table cycles. When ballooning occurs, the simulated stool clogs the filter and the filter system can no longer release the air.
Numerous commercial filtering systems were evaluated. Results of various pouch designs, with and without pleats, are summarized in
The physical dimension of an axial flow filter versus a radial flow filter is shown in Table 1. Table 2 is a summary of the H2S deodorization results of the same axial flow filter and the radial flow filter at various relative humidity and with different carrier gases.
Table 3 is a summary of the H2S deodorization results of a strip filter, in a rectangular dimension 15 mm×33 mm, versus a round filter with a diameter of 25.4 mm. Although the total surface area and the activated carbon thickness are about the same, the strip filter had significantly higher deodorization time due to the increased effective flow distance. In this example, the effective flow distance is almost 33% longer, resulting in a longer H2S deodorization time.
The present invention includes the following:
1. Pleated center panel that improves clogging resistance. An open cell foam can be added to further increase clogging resistance. This pleated design, with and without the foam, can be used with all types of filters, round or strip, radial flow or axial flow. The pleated design, with and without the foam, can be used in either drainable or closed pouch.
2. An axial flow filter with an equivalent or better deodorization time although the activated carbon layer is thinner and the surface area is smaller in an axial flow filter.
3. A strip filter with an equivalent or better deodorization time as a result of the increased effective flow distance, as compared to a round filter which has the about the same thickness and surface area.
The present invention is an ostomy appliance 10 (
The ostomy pouch 18 further includes a center pleated panel 28 present between the front panel 12 and rear panel 14. This center pleated panel 28 includes an edge 30 attached to the outer edge 16 of the ostomy pouch 18. The center pleated panel has a partially free edge portion 32 that is attached intermittently 34 to the inner surface of the front panel 12. This center pleated panel 28 is predeterminedly dimensioned and attached to the front panel 12 in a manner to produce extra material in the form of folds, corrugations or pleats 36 within the pouch 18; the pleats 36 permit odorous gas to reach the filter assembly 22 for deodorization while deterring a ballooning of the pouch 18 due to captured gas within the pouch.
The pleated center panel 28 extends partially down from the top 36 of the ostomy pouch so as to at least partially and preferably totally cover and protect the filter assembly 22 from any body waste material entering the pouch 18 through the stomal opening 20. The pleats 36 are formed in part by the spot welds 38 securing the edge portion 32 to the front panel 12. The pleated center panel 28 has a bottom edge 40. The pleated center panel 28 is preferably made of the same standard ostomy pouch material used for the front panel 12 and rear panel 14.
Variations and modifications to the preferred embodiment may be made while falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4411659 | Jensen et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
5074851 | Plass et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5250042 | Torgalkar et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5306264 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5401264 | Leise, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5643234 | Lesko | Jul 1997 | A |
5690623 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
7083569 | Boulanger | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7214217 | Pedersen | May 2007 | B2 |
7476220 | Lillegaard | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7572492 | Bager et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7604622 | Pedersen | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20030014023 | Kanbara | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040727 | Boulanger | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050143696 | Pedersen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070049880 | Suehr | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070203466 | Pedersen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080004580 | Mullejans et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090227973 | Bjarne | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247970 | Keleny | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100241092 | Nguyen-DeMary | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120283678 | Nguyen-DeMary | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20170042723 | Oberholtzer et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103228236 | Jul 2013 | CN |
0443728 | Aug 1991 | EP |
3134040 | Mar 2017 | EP |
2149306 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2116433 | Aug 1985 | GB |
2461721 | Jan 2010 | GB |
S6121414 | May 1986 | JP |
2000126216 | May 2000 | JP |
2001031115 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003010226 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003019154 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003513776 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2005211178 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2010504150 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2011136574 | Jul 2011 | JP |
WO-2015164832 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP 11829957.7 Supplementary European Search Report Completed May 14, 2014. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201180057593.X 4th Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2016. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-531905 Decision of Rejection dated May 10, 2016. |
Australia Patent Application No. 2016266028 Examination Report No. 1 dated Sep. 12, 2017. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-177009 Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2017. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,813,248 Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2017. |
European Patent Application No. 15783238.7 extended European Search Report dated Nov. 23, 2017. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,813,248 Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2018. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201580034580.9 Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-177009 Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2018. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-563963 Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130085463 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |